Wolfgang Porsche39:14
It was exactly as you said. The die-hard fans, to whom I also count myself a bit, you can tell, those who have a heart for air-cooled cars, the die-hard 356 fans actually totally rejected the new 911. I mean, you have to say that. It wasn't just with the new 911, but I'm also including the 928, which came a bit later, which Professor Fuhrmann promoted and even had it race against a 911 on the Nürburgring Nordschleife and told journalists that the 928 was much faster and much safer. And there was even consideration at the time to split production, so the future was 45 cars a day, maybe 530 928s and maybe 15 911s. You can think about what would have happened if that had been the case. That was a real demand. And then the die-hard fans, and especially the new 911 people who loved the car, were afraid that it would be discontinued. That was definitely a consideration, but it would have been insane, because the car... I have one. I mean, it was certainly ahead of its time, but I didn't find it particularly beautiful, with those sleepy eyes. The feeling is that the flaps are only for the cw value, otherwise they make no sense. Otherwise, they are of their time. But I mean, that was also because this car was never that big and didn't have as much space as you would have guessed from the outside. There I have to say, when I think about how we, five or six of us, sat in a 356, we sat in the back, my parents sat in the front. We were still small, but still, we fit. We weren't babies. So 10, 12 years old, you can't imagine. It was a different time. I sometimes say, when I think about what this company has already endured. Absolutely, it's unimaginable. In '29, even with the 911, the engine power was reduced to give the 928 a bit of a boost. That's absolutely... I make the headlines: the customer must decide what he wants. And sometimes, unfortunately in the group as well, at least in the past, it was very focused on the US business. The Beetle always sold, but everything that was made afterwards was actually always somewhat ridiculed in the US. The Jetta maybe sold for half the time, but those were always cars conceived in Wolfsburg, and the Americans were blessed with the thing whether they wanted it or not. And that's why I simply believe it's very important to involve the customers. The customer is the service, the cohesion, those are very important things. I can't just make cars and the connective tissue is the electric car. I can't tell a customer you have to drive electric. If he doesn't believe he can get from A to B, then you can give him 4000 euros, he still won't buy the car. Now, at the ice race, you can see how well electric cars work on ice. They do well. But when I think about range anxiety, like when your phone only has 50% battery left and you're not sure if it will last the day, I think the electric car is probably just a feeling. Because it's naturally a fixed win. Most electric cars, I can drive from Vienna to Salzburg. Then I can... it very often happens that you find a slower Tesla behind a truck near Mondsee, probably because he doesn't believe he'll make it to Salzburg otherwise, or only very slowly. And from Salzburg to Vienna, near St. Pölten, it can also happen that he drives slower. But when it gets to the end, they will just have to imagine. That's why I drive, I love it, and I'm always sure. Yes, I think the most important thing is that you don't just charge the batteries with the engine, because then it makes no sense. Then it's actually just window dressing. That's why the legislator is now being a bit cautious. A hybrid must have a certain range, a certain battery size, to get a subsidy. I always charge my Panamera at home, so I can say that's how it is. They thought I could get up to 37 kilometers purely electric. That's not a huge amount, but it's enough for most business trips, especially in Hamburg. Friends of mine who drive in the city only drive electrically, charge at home, and drive off. That's only inter-city. And some could also charge while shopping or at work if there were a charging station there, then you could use it even better. My concern is whether we can get the infrastructure right. The infrastructure has to be right. I mean, if 1000 cars want to charge every day at a highway rest stop, and at the moment, if I register that I want to charge somewhere in Munich, the system has to work. If there are five cars in front of you, you sit there for nothing, even though you might only need ten minutes for another 100 kilometers. But I think everything takes a bit of time. You have to involve the customer. If you only decide things at a desk, that doesn't work. He wants to experience it and believe it. Professor Fritz Indra, whom I have also been allowed to interview, is not the biggest electric fan, one could say, but he also said you have to start from the customer. You have to see what the customer buys, and you can't force him. And at the moment, it's simply the case that the diesel, as a bread-and-butter car, is better in terms of price-performance ratio. And when electric cars are no longer subsidized and are taxed, that's when it starts. The politicians are all crazy. It's absurd to decide on a nuclear phase-out together with electromobility. That's actually a clean... and here we see a reason why the nuclear phase-out in the leadership bodies in Japan... and I heard this from someone who was told by the Chancellor: 'You know, I also know that there can be tsunamis here, but we had elections and that doesn't look good, so I said we'll phase out.' After Marc Rath predicted 340, you extend it, then you have to... the politicians are so driven. And the French and the countries around us all have nuclear power, and we import it. It's guaranteed that you can't produce cheap electricity yourself and... the Germans would continue to develop this technology, and they are good at it, but now they've stopped everything because they don't do it themselves anymore. So it's a bit difficult when you imagine that for Porsche, or your grandfather Ferdinand, ever thought that a charging station for an electric car would be installed on a sign here. Why not, actually? He already built electric cars in 1900. So in the end, it's not that far-fetched. But he realized back then that it wasn't time to do it that way. So you could say 100 years later, it should work. I know he also welcomed the hybrid, because he welcomed it when others did it. The car was relatively heavy, as it still is today. In a tender, it's a team. It's also the question, I believe the battery topic will also develop. Nobody really wants to drive from Munich to Hamburg in a purely electric car on the highway at 150 km/h. Instead, you should be able to drive on diesel or petrol for long distances. If you take so much battery weight with you, you need a relatively large battery, and that means a lot of weight, and then you have to move three tons. That can only be an exercise. Or these dreams of Elon Musk to build trucks with electric motors. That doesn't work either if you can't charge in between. Half the load is already batteries. You have to dream a bit. And he also does practical design. That was certainly an absolute possibility for the vehicle. I think so too. It's so difficult that the dam transport content is no longer given. We agree that electric is a bridge technology, and eventually hydrogen will come, or engines will become so efficient and light. The cars, that's also a topic. I think the engine developers will go so far and build engines that consume little and emit little CO2. And then suddenly the customers come and want it the way it was before, which also ruins a lot. And I tell you, synthetic fuels will also be a topic. It will be tight, Michael Mann. And the politicians are called upon. They hold everything back. All the taxes and levies on petrol, that's very important to them. But we could drive all our old cars with synthetic fuel, and not with 200 grams of CO2, but with maybe ten grams less, because the CO2 is taken from the atmosphere. But the legislator is now working on it, they try to do as little as possible, or do something in the wrong direction. And I can quote for us that this title scandal would not have happened if politics had been more open to other solutions. So as I said, it will be decided at some point. What is difficult in such topics is to make quick decisions. Now it's 226, now 195, and every gram not achieved costs 95 euros per vehicle. So the fines will be high. And that's actually the main danger: if you don't get enough cars on the road, you'll have a hard time because the fines are too high. I heard now, I won't say the brand, but a manufacturer calculated about 250 million in fines for this year, and then looked at it more closely and now believes it will probably be a billion in fines. That naturally hurts for further developments, for the press, or for the shareholders' dividends. It's dangerous.