Birgit Bohle7:52
Maybe I'll step back a bit. That post was from our leadership event in November of this year, last year 2024. We started the journey into the year with the theme of values and went to Krakow with the top 200, and also visited Auschwitz in that context. That's certainly special for a leadership event. We took three days to talk about values in society and our role, and how we interact internally. Out of that came a very intensive discourse. We continued that thread at the leadership event. When I think about the headline 'act instead of easy courage', it became clearer to me over the past year that it's easy to write something on LinkedIn or be photographed at a demonstration and believe we've changed something. But we only change through actual action. I made an example of a company that publicly positioned itself against a certain political party, received applause on LinkedIn, but when it became difficult locally, they backed down because they couldn't sustain it. We say let's stay in action. For example, we discussed why young people vote the way they do. We don't know how our young employees vote, but we can assume they are a representative cross-section. Instead of dismissing those who vote for extreme parties as idiots, which ends the discourse and changes nothing, we choose to understand the reasons. Our head of training asks what worries young people and how we can help. Topics like financial security, health, fake news. We can offer educational programs on retirement savings, for instance. We as a company are trusted, and we can make a small contribution to reduce worries and build confidence. That has more impact than slogans. That was my first point. Regarding red lines: I observe that through the way we talk and what we allow, boundaries shift. It's a concern that with the renewed presidency of Donald Trump, things appear okay that obviously are not. When I see that in the wake of the election results, companies are rowing back on their diversity and inclusion efforts, I say: hello, attention. That's why I formulated that red lines must be red lines. It takes courage to say in a meeting that something was not respectful. Boundaries shift when a values violation goes uncommented. So we need to speak up and defend the lines.