Grazia Vittadini15:13
How it has changed for me quite radically. If you had asked me what I think about any initiative focused on gender diversity up to my first executive position, I would have politely declined the invitation. My rationale was: do I consider being a woman an advantage? Yes, but I was born this way, I have no merits for it. Why should you underline something that should just be there? Measure me for what I can do, for my experience and competence, and leave me alone. But later, I realized that looking back at my professional journey, there were uncomfortable situations. For example, being introduced as 'our wonderful gorgeous new chief engineer' – would they do that if I were a man? Another time, I reported a success in getting a modification number in two weeks (normally three months) because I sat next to configuration managers and understood what they needed. My boss responded to a colleague's complaint by saying, 'You don't have long black hair, so it will never work with you.' I gathered courage and told my boss that was unacceptable. He said I was too serious, it was a joke, but I insisted it never happen again – and it didn't. I never felt discriminated beyond that, but when I became an executive and more visible, women came to me with horror stories: being asked why they weren't wearing makeup for customers, being given men's clothes in small sizes when women aren't rectangular, being asked about family plans in job interviews – which is illegal. That prompted me to think we need to do something. It's stupid for a company to not harness 50% of resources. We don't have the luxury to disregard half the world's population. So I became more active and vocal. But I learned that being a woman doesn't automatically make someone an ally – there are women as power-hungry as some alpha males. So I'm trying to be less naïve. Still, I'm all in. Things that make me angry, like our company having a certain percentage of women engineers, but only one third of that percentage are acknowledged fellows or experts. Shouldn't we have the same percentage? We have the same universities, same professors, same courses. This makes me angry, and I want to change it. The change that has happened is exciting: now there's more recognition from male allies and the business side that we can't eliminate 50% of talent. But the pace is not there – projections say we'll have equality in access to leadership and salary gaps worldwide in 2095. I don't have that patience. Why not now? A lot of it is knowing yourself for your own well-being. I've seen too many attempts to mold women into cookie-cutter schemes. We need to mentor men and leaders to actively seek diversity, not delegate it to HR. Diversity responds to different criteria. When I recruit, I see wonderful women who start with a pitch about wanting a career and success, but then their real driven personality comes through. They've been told they need to deliver that pitch to be considered successful. That's horrific. So know yourself, and let's start coaching men, perhaps.