Grazia Vittadini7:47
Definitely, definitely good to go. This is really one of my favorite topics, talking about the sustainability of space. Basically, when we mention debris, we mean space junk. Picture this: more than 40,000 objects flying out there, floating around the Earth orbit, and many, many more too small to be tracked, all around our planet. Some are generated by satellites orbiting around the Earth no longer operative, decaying. Back in the past, if I remember well, it was 2009, I believe there was even an impact of two satellites, which really generated an enormous amount of debris. There was another satellite which exploded. We're talking about thousands and thousands of bits and pieces really polluting the orbits around the Earth. So basically, debris is all what flies out there and does not have a purpose. Now, objects above 10 centimeters can be tracked, and a lot of resources are being invested to track exactly the positioning of these bits and pieces around our planet so that satellites in case of emergency can divert, can maneuver to avoid the collision. These are the biggest parts of debris floating out there. But there's also the category between one and ten centimeters, which is very difficult to track if not impossible, and poses a significant risk because it can impact another satellite. Satellites normally are shielded, but there is the risk that a shield will not be enough. There is a risk of it impacting a spaceship, and we don't want to hinder space exploration. The problem unfortunately is increasing because as you certainly know, there are so many satellite constellations being launched. We're talking about thousands and thousands of additional small satellites which really pose a significant threat to other satellites and to space exploration. So there are different ways to cope with this incredible challenge for humanity. Leave no trace: all current satellites need to be designed in order to have on board a post-mission disposal type of mechanism, so that when a satellite stops operating, it goes out of orbit by itself, gets burned through the atmosphere, and if any parts remain, these fall into the ocean. Now, is this something we believe is sustainable on the long term? I do not, absolutely. So I'm a strong advocate of the fact that tomorrow we need to be in a position to develop in-orbit services in order to repair, refuel, repurpose basically inoperative satellites floating out there. And maybe not tomorrow but the day after tomorrow, I really believe we will need to actively clean up, so debris remediation missions, active debris removal, is definitely something we're going to need to invest in for the sake of our planet, of the space around it, of humanity, and space travel.