Back
Pierre Prumm
Chief Technical Officer, Fraport AG

IMMOTALK TV im Dialog mit Dr. Pierre Dominique Prümm (Vorstand Aviation + Infrastruktur Fraport AG)

🎥 Jun 03, 2020 📺 IMMOTALK TV ⏱ 6m 👁 392 views
Watch on YouTube
Transcript (17 segments)
N
Narrator0:02
Music
I
Interviewer0:12
You are the responsible board member of Fraport AG for aviation and infrastructure. The corona pandemic is currently changing the world. Terminal 3 is a megaproject at the Frankfurt location. How is this crisis currently affecting the construction project?
P
Pierre Prumm0:33
First, it is important to emphasize that we have decided to complete Terminal 3, even though we are currently experiencing a very sustained and severe drop in our passenger numbers. We are confident that air traffic will return. The growth dynamics of air traffic will come back. People want to travel; the basic need for mobility remains, and therefore we will need Terminal 3. According to plan, the first section should be completed in autumn 2021.
I
Interviewer1:04
The rest is expected after initial corona-related construction delays during the year 2024. You have already considered the pandemic in your planning.
P
Pierre Prumm1:12
We are in the process of adjusting this a bit. The basic plans and the basic schedule remain in place, but of course, we are now looking at what is happening on the construction site. We have to manage certain interdependencies that we had not even planned for; we have to disentangle some services, and we are currently defining that. This means there might still be slight adjustments, but the basic schedule remains as described.
I
Interviewer1:44
As you described, temporarily putting such a large project on hold due to the corona crisis and later ramping it up again would have been grossly negligent from a technical and economic perspective.
P
Pierre Prumm2:02
Well, we naturally looked at that too, and one must clearly say that it would not have made any sense at all. Shutting down such a large and complex construction site, waiting for some time, and then ramping it up again would involve incredible complexity and, above all, cost a lot of money, which we do not have at the moment. Therefore, we clearly decided to stick to the original project schedule with the adjustments as described.
I
Interviewer2:24
A construction stop would therefore have caused enormous additional costs and could have led to considerable technical and structural risks.
P
Pierre Prumm2:38
Yes, exactly, that is the case. Anyone who works in the construction industry, who is active on the construction site, knows that you need a certain amount of pressure, both in terms of time and cost budget. When the pressure is gone, it's difficult to manage a construction site. Stopping construction sites and then starting again is never a good way.
I
Interviewer2:56
Fraport AG is an economic motor in the metropolitan region. The construction industry is worried and is demanding an emergency plan for building and housing in Hesse. The capacities of skilled workers that were painstakingly built up are at risk of possible layoffs. Is the airport operator only active at Terminal 3 within the framework of its measures?
P
Pierre Prumm3:20
No, we are naturally also active in the surroundings of Terminal 3, so on the rest of the airport. We have an incredibly large stock of infrastructure and buildings, networks, the runway system—all these assets naturally require permanent maintenance, care, but also investments in expansions and adjustments. We are also planning to invest there in the coming years, and this sums up to at least three-digit million euro amounts each year that we are investing here at the location beyond Terminal 3, and this will remain the case in the future.
I
Interviewer4:03
It's nice to hear that. You remain a reliable partner for the Hessian construction industry. However, the industry is calling for more tenders by the public hand to avoid idle time from the fourth quarter of 2020 onwards. Can you understand that?
P
Pierre Prumm4:24
Yes, definitely. I see it here with us; due to the dramatic drops, we are also adjusting our investment program. We are checking very carefully what we still need at all and what we can still afford in terms of infrastructure investments. And that will be the case for every company in the Rhine-Main region. Therefore, the investment volume and construction activity will, I assume, simply decrease in the coming years.
I
Interviewer4:55
And here the public hand can help if it steps in accordingly and invests itself. Last night, the federal government and the coalition essentially decided on an extensive economic stimulus package. In the media, it is reported that the 130 billion euro stimulus package is apparently a hopeless mess after a partisan tug-of-war. The program is said to resemble a shotgun blast—a few pellets hit the mark, but many miss the target. Do you have an initial opinion on this, and does this economic stimulus package influence construction and investment decisions for Fraport at the Frankfurt am Main location?
P
Pierre Prumm5:40
Well, this affects us less; air traffic is only mentioned in very small areas, and it also does not affect our investment program here in Frankfurt. Nevertheless, I would not evaluate the program too negatively overall. The state's attempt to stimulate the economy and not strangle it—it is a very broad approach that is not necessarily bad. Therefore, one must wait and see how it works. There are approaches that I believe will benefit every sector. For example, the VAT reduction—in total, it is a very, very difficult task that the public hand has there, that the state currently has, and I think this is a first step in the right direction. However, I fear that we will need to follow up with a few more packages and measures to prevent a really severe economic downturn in Germany.
I
Interviewer6:37
Dr. Prumm, thank you very much for this conversation.
P
Pierre Prumm6:41
You're very welcome.