Jean-François van Boxmeer5:40
Well, it's the realization we were very much on the outlook. We were at the stage where we were very well exploiting the digital world to build the brands, but we realized that we were not exploiting it to sell the brand. How can we explore these new technologies to improve our sales capacities? That's where we realized we would have to take a step forward. The way we went about it was a little bit kind of: we started to have the discussion in the executive team as a team, a conversation: what can we do? We booked ourselves into Silicon Valley, I know it's very classic, perhaps a little bit cliché, but during our visits we continued to speak about what we could do. Then we returned and we chose not for an approach of a big bang, but for developing initiatives that could immediately make sense, bring business, and be examples for the whole organization of what the new possibilities are with these new technologies. For that, your executive team must be very well aligned, understands, is equally passionate and fired up to do it. Then you have to positively infect the rest of your organization as step two. For that, you have to develop initiatives not at the center, but in the business, where people realize in a country that by developing a system and deploying technology, it really improved their life and their performance. As a CEO, and maybe for other CEOs on this transformation journey, I'd say: we all got inspired, executive team needs to be aligned, you really need to do initiatives in the countries. What else can I say in terms of inspiration? You can be quite lonely on this journey; it needs vision, stamina. When you say to an organization 'we go more digital,' naturally people will cheer you up because it's just, you know, we're surrounded with it in our daily life. That is not the difficult goal. Everybody sees we have to go where the whole world is going. The real issue comes when you have a problem. It's a process where you have to accept that you make errors. Big organizations like Heineken are used to flawless planning and execution and don't know how to deal with problems along the way. So it's developing adaptive capacities: when things don't work out, to take a step back, saying it's not a problem, try another way. Installing that kind of mental agility to deal with something you cannot plan in advance. You have to have a direction, but you cannot plan the exact outcome, and you have to be able to live with that. As an organization, you have to learn, and as leadership, you have to show tolerance for failure more than ever. Then you have to have a lot of resilience. In the beginning, you may pay a hefty price for little success. If you pull the plug too early, you forgo gigantic opportunities. But you also need to know where it really doesn't work and exit a project, learning from it. You have to show a certain degree of calmness and look at facts rather than getting emotionally infected when things go wrong. The crucial thing is to capitalize on learnings, get learnings from mistakes, know what to do and what not to do, not repeat the same mistake. You have to create an ecosystem that is an open book, transparency is required. People should feel safe to work and tell the truth in a large organization. At Heineken, we chose an approach where some initiatives were developed at arm's length from the group rather than within, because early integration would have killed or made development difficult. That's more or less what we did.