Back
Maeda Tadashi
Chairman of the Board of Directors (Managing Director), Japan Bank for International Cooperation

Tadashi Maeda, Japan In Conversation With Mihir Sharma, ORF | Raisina Dialogue 2023

🎥 Mar 01, 2023 📺 Observer Research Foundation ⏱ 14m 👁 6323 views
Raisina Dialogue 2023 | In Conversation: Tadashi Maeda, Chairman of the Board, Japan Bank for International Cooperation (JBIC), Japan Mihir Swarup Sharma Director, Centre for Economy and Growth Programme, ORF, India About Raisina Dialogue: The Raisina Dialogue is India’s premier conference on geopolitics and geoeconomics committed to addressing the most challenging issues facing the global community. Every year, leaders in politics, business, media, and civil society converge in New Delhi to discuss the state of the world and explore opportunities for cooperation on a wide range of contempor...
Watch on YouTube
Transcript (11 segments)
M
Mihir Sharma0:00
Hello and welcome back to the Raisina Idea Spot, where we at the Raisina Dialogue organized by the Observer Research Foundation speak to some of the smartest minds in the world who have come here for this dialogue and will discuss the issues and ideas that will shape our common future. I'm Mihir Sharma, director of the event of economy and growth at the Observer Research Foundation. And with me is Maeda-san, who is the head of the Japan Bank for International Cooperation and a friend of ORF and of India. We are going to be speaking to him now about some aspects of the India-Japan bilateral relationship and all of Japan's broader outreach to the world. Maeda-san, this is the year in which India is the president of the G20 and Japan holds the presidency of the G7 group of nations. These are groupings that together have to create pathways forward on multiple things such as the digital transformation, the green transformation, the energy transformation. What are Japan's priorities at its presidency of the G7 and how do you foresee there being a linkage between that and the work of the G20?
M
Maeda Tadashi1:14
Well, thank you. Besides that political argument, particularly the Russia-Ukraine issue, there are multiple points to discuss in G7 and also G20. We are a member of G20 and G7, and the G7 presidency, as you correctly addressed, obviously the path to carbon neutrality is one of the most important pieces. And also, while we discussed the just transition, the new framework that the JETP (Just Energy Transition Partnership) is to be addressed. It started from South Africa, then expanded to Asian countries, in particular Vietnam, Indonesia, and also India will possibly be a part of this idea. And also, on November 14th of last year, on the margin of a G20 Bali, Prime Minister Kishida and President Jokowi of Indonesia jointly announced and launched the so-called Asia Zero Emission Community, which is supplemental to the idea of JETP. However, there is some difference between the two. Our approach of the Asia Zero Emission Community is to be more practical, and also that the language that each country's agenda, for example, many countries including India have on the growth strategy, and also that they are struggling with the compatibility between carbon neutrality and growth. So these countries may not sacrifice economic growth because of carbon neutrality. Therefore, each country has their own agenda. So that's the idea of AZEC is trying to accommodate these differences. That's ideal. And in September, on September 1st of 2022, Prime Minister appointed me as a special advisor to the cabinet of administration, and my main task is to materialize the AZEC. One of my agenda, I visited Indonesia and also Vietnam, and I talked about this idea with leaders of these two countries, in particular Indonesia, and as a G7 previous G20 presidency. So that's a point.
M
Mihir Sharma3:51
Thank you very much. And I think we're all interested to see how the Asia Zero Emission Community turns out, particularly because as you point out, it incorporates national imperative. It is technologically neutral because it focuses on zero emissions, and it is something that looks in particular at the shared growth strategy of this region. Prime Minister Kishida is due to visit India later this month. We're recording this in March. And the Indo-Japan partnership is, I would say, one of the strongest that we have in India, and it has great historic roots. The late Prime Minister Shinzo Abe truly elevated this relationship, and in fact, the Raisina Dialogue itself is in some ways a product of Abe-san's idea of a free and open Indo-Pacific. I wanted to ask where you see this relationship between India and Japan proceeding over the next 10 or 15 years, and what would be your ideal outcomes for it?
M
Maeda Tadashi4:57
Yeah, the former Prime Minister is a true visionary because he delivered the key note speech in 2006 in the Indian Parliament on free and open Indo-Pacific. It's his product. And now everybody talks about the free and open Indo-Pacific, but this is his idea. That's a very important piece. And Prime Minister Kishida wants to legitimize and also succeed this legacy of Prime Minister Abe and to develop more. Besides that, the very flexible framework of the Quad is very important. And also equally important is to develop the bilateral relationship, not just under the framework of the Quad. So we have both the presidency of G7 and G20. We need to coordinate in a more effective manner. Therefore, for example, in terms of the energy transition, we can launch simultaneously in G7 and G20 on the same title mechanism to promote that energy transition in a just energy transition. So idea, for example, to have a verification mechanism of the carbon dioxide gas emission and to develop the ideas of the carbon credit. Because without verification mechanism, carbon credit is not worth investing. So that's very important. And for example, that's my own idea: to create a verification task force to, for example, the National or World Bank group to operate this framework. For example, the EV obviously while driving does not emit any carbon dioxide gas, but in the manufacturing stage, in the life cycle assessment, it is more important. It is very down to earth, not just on the power generation sector but on the infrastructure, stands for less around 30 to 40, but other sectors like cement and steel industry and so on. This is all on the shoulder of different sectors, so we need to standardize this kind of mechanism and to be verified correctly.
M
Mihir Sharma7:31
And in fact, JBIC itself has last year raised a certain amount of money through green bonds. What is your experience there in the green bond market, and do you feel that there are ways in which you can support institutions within India, financial institutions, to help deepen this market in emerging issues?
M
Maeda Tadashi7:51
Yeah, well, we intended at the continuously, that's the issue of the green bond. At the same time, we need to pay attention to the use of proceeds of the bond issued by the green bond. And also, in India in particular, we have been launching the Green Growth Platform with the counterpart in India, which is NIIF. This has two different aspects: one is the joint investment fund between NIIF and JBIC, and also that's the direct lending in-depth financing to the corporation company that NIIF already invested or going to invest, if it goes through the criteria on green growth. That concept is a very brand new idea and makes a comprehensive approach to support and promote the green growth in India.
M
Mihir Sharma8:52
You had mentioned earlier about the importance of verification, and I'm going to link that up maybe verification, the old MRV monitoring and verification question, to the idea now that with the digital transformation it may become easier to develop trust in such matters as carbon credits. How do you see the digital transformation changing how we talk to each other financially, and how do you see the digital and green transformation interacting?
M
Maeda Tadashi9:25
Some implications: one is the same cost of the daily cash, and second is the financial inclusiveness. So many of the poor, especially in developing countries, in particular females, do not have a bank account. So even if they don't have any bank accounts, we include them financially. Digital transformation is a very important and very robust instrument to that financial inclusiveness. Therefore, this is very important. Therefore, the venue, whether G20 or G7, we need to discuss more correctly. And also we have to pay attention to cross-border transmission, cross-border settlement of finance. So it would make a sea change of the financial circumstances right now. Therefore, it will reduce some of the expanding gap of income level and then serve as equality and also fairness. That's very important.
M
Mihir Sharma10:39
Finding medicine, we're running short of time, but I will ask you a last big picture question. Many countries across the global South look to Japan as a reliable partner, as a source of quality infrastructure and source of sustainability and finance, and in a relationship that does not undermine their own sustainability and their own internal political dynamics. They look to India similarly, many countries across the global South, as a way, as a location where their own concerns can be voiced, as their partner in shifting the arena of global governance towards a more development-focused orientation. What are the ways that you believe India and Japan could partner in ensuring that the global South gets a fair shot at green growth and a fair say in global governance?
M
Maeda Tadashi11:35
Well, I say India and Japan partnership is ideal because India is an emerging and growing and rising power. India already surpassed the United Kingdom in terms of the size of economy, the GDP, and it may be in the very near future that they surpass Germany or Japan. But we need a very trustworthy India as a leader of the region or leader of the global issues. It must be addressed correctly. Japan started as a member of G7 in the 1970s. Therefore, we have a track record. We have a mutual supplement because we are aging, but we have the track record as a leader of G7. That's why I said it is a very ideal partnership. And also, we are going to develop together with India, not just only at the level of economic growth, but to develop a new kind of concept which is good for everybody in the world. And also, one of Japan's advantages is trust. We after the war, we have been trusted because of our ancestors' effort and my dad and mom's generation. And we need to create a new and good, stable, prosperous world for the generation to come, for children and grandchildren. So that is very important. So Japan-India partnership, this partnership group, will make a very trustworthy framework that is just beyond maybe beyond the Quad, our G7, G20. That's a very key cornerstone of the stability and freedom, and both are committed countries to the promotion of fair democracy.
M
Mihir Sharma13:52
Thank you, and you're right, I think trust is at the center of our relationship between India and Japan. Thank you for joining us at the Raisina Idea Spot. Thank you, thank you so much.