Interviewer1:50
Okay, and what are those demands? Because the financial sector – everyone finds it terrible, actually we would rather have nothing to do with it. There are two sides to the opportunity. People are not really interested. On one side you see the government withdrawing, employers withdrawing in pension areas. That becomes increasingly relevant. What we do becomes only more important if we can bring it to customers in the right way. Things that are not interesting for customers, you need to bring at the right moment, make it easy, encourage self-service. If you want to be sustainable, learn to clean up cleanly. Technology today offers many possibilities. So at the right moment about financial matters – I think of marriage, children, houses – life stages. There are moments when you are thirty, in a location, in the birth shop, then you could see that you might have a child, and it might be relevant to send information about what that means in your life. We should set up again as a product supplier. Our products could be others' products too, with an open architecture. We can even let people steer their own financial future. That's like the mortgage you have with your company, which sells other products. Yes, but it's eye-opening. Also more work on accessibility of advice as cheaply as possible by introducing self-service and automating assistants. The intermediary from Rotterdam can give advice at much lower costs. I started with mortgages and rolled out to other forms. The more the customer does themselves, the cheaper it is. Yes, but what is the rule then? Is it meant to be an insurance intermediary product, or is it something to teach me how to reorient the 80 billion balance sheet factory? How does that fit within innovation?