Arun Singh1:57
Thank you for asking this question. In fact, this 10 years is contextual, in the sense that if you are in deep water offshore exploration, to commence the exploration and then to bring oil or gas to the surface, that is a 10-year context. For onshore, particularly if you discover something, it could be as low as, from starting day, a maximum of 3 years.
But the global trend now, if you see, most of the oil and gas now being found in the last decade or so, the new discoveries are in deep or ultra-deep water. Guyana, for example, Exxon explored for so many years, now it is almost going to hit 1 million barrel production.
Why I said this, for deep water and ultra-deep water, because you start the process by taking a license, then you have to do seismic, then you have to process it, then interpret it, because it's very large data. Then you make a choice about a location to drill and see whether your prognosis is right or wrong.
So that drilling itself, planning a drilling in ultra-deep water, signing a contract, and then drilling, and finally discovering oil, that process itself, whatever you do, it takes around 4 years. Then after discovery, you will appraise it, how much is the oil, whether it's economic or not, that also takes around a year or so.
Then you have to source, you have to do subsea equipment, that project typically I don't think anybody has done in less than four years. And then if you have gas, you have another challenge of converting it, if you're close to shore fine, if not you have to convert into LNG to ship it. So nowadays if you see all the last four years, the numbers which have come from either Brazil or Guyana, the big numbers, these are all ultra-deep water.
In our context also, for our country, we believe now that earlier roughly 3.36 million square kilometers of sedimentary basin in our country, 1.2 was blocked, never explored, which has potential because what we call sedimentary basins. Those blocks the government released very recently, and now we expect a lot from there. But most of it, we also believe, will be ultra-deep water.
So in that context, I said we need to compress the time, compress the time of exploring, seismic exploration. Now for example, we know for sure that we'll keep doing exploration in deep water for the next five years, then we should contract a vessel on a long-term basis, and whoever is exploring there can use the same vessel, so then you can save all those times. Plus you can also compress the time of data processing and interpretation.
Similarly, this is one side where we said that in our country also, if we believe large potential is left in deep or ultra-deep water, that was the context in which I said 10 years. Otherwise, if you find something onshore, it's a game of today also. In Gujarat, if we keep drilling, we keep discovering, we keep producing. But these quantities just go in making up for the declining production.
From the onshore area, we've been producing 6 million tons of oil a year for the last 10 years, because what we call normal decline of reservoir is a very standard phenomenon, 6 to 7% you lose production every year from existing reservoirs. So you keep discovering new reservoirs in adjacent or nearby areas and you keep compensating for it.
But if exploration finds something big, like we found Rajasthan onshore decades back, and after that something big in our country, if I remember correctly, is Krishna Godavari. The rest are small pools which are just going to make up for the continued production.
So it was contextual. I wanted to summarize that it should not be said that 10 years it takes in all circumstances. Like for the Middle East, it may be two years, because Middle East is all big reservoirs are still onshore.