Maria Chiesi3:03
It was born through a plebiscite. When we became a benefit corporation, we gathered all our management and asked: facing the social challenges of Agenda 2030, what is the most important challenge for us? The management said almost unanimously: climate change. So we committed to carbon neutrality by 2035. We were among the first to join the Climate Pledge and wrote this commitment into our statutes — making our goal of achieving a zero-emission economy explicit and undeniable.
First, we built competencies. Even now, expertise is scarce — imagine three years ago. We created a dedicated team of engineers, because as Jeffrey Sachs says, it's engineers who study these things and know how to solve them. We also got burned by some consultants because external expertise was low at the time.
We investigated protocols extensively. We followed the GHG Protocol, which isn't a universal standard — it's English, not even European — but it's the best available.
The first step is taking inventory. Our 2021 data, public in our sustainability report, shows 95% of our emissions come from Scope 3 — indirect emissions. Scope 2 is very low because we already source 100% energy from renewables. Most Scope 1 and 3 emissions come from our products — mainly asthma and chronic bronchitis medications, including classic asthma inhalers. Those inhalers contain fluorinated gases with a powerful climate-altering effect. We were among the first to introduce them, replacing CFCs that caused the ozone hole. In the early 2000s it seemed like a solution, but it wasn't — not all consequences were studied.
These gases contribute only about 0.1% of global emissions, but for us it's everything — it's all of our emissions.
Once the inventory is done, you need a reduction plan. We set net zero for Scopes 1 and 2 by 2030, and Scope 3 by 2035. We had this validated by the Science Based Targets initiative and made it transparent through CDP.
The actions include reducing energy consumption — very difficult in a highly regulated sector where developing a drug takes 15 years and changing a comma on the package insert requires ministerial approval; switching to renewable energy; electrifying the vehicle fleet; reducing air travel — COVID helped us here; green logistics. But most importantly, developing products with a new propellant, HFO.
This year we're introducing a new quantitative indicator: the carbon budget — a maximum emissions budget for Scopes 1 and 2. If you exceed the carbon budget, you walk. We're usually very good at meeting our budgets.
Products represent the vast majority of our emissions, so difficult choices must be made. A key aspect is lifecycle assessment — a carbon footprint model for current drugs that also serves as the design template for future drugs.
For current drugs: reduce waste through patient training, reduce excessive use, and recover and recycle inhalers. Used inhalers still contain about 40 doses of safety propellant mandated by regulators — all propellant that could be released into the environment. We launched a project called 'Recupera e Respira' — Recover and Breathe — for recycling used inhalers in Italy and England. We also freeze and capture all gas escaping during production.
But to truly solve the problem, you must go to the root: replace the propellant. We started at the end of 2018 — seven years of clinical studies to re-evaluate efficacy and safety, and to re-industrialize from zero. Three hundred and fifty million euros of investment. This will bring us, by 2027, an inhaler that reduces its carbon footprint by 90%.
I'm certain that if we don't do this, we'll be off the market in a few years, because when all healthcare systems decarbonize, they won't accept pharmaceutical products with this type of emissions. The sustainability of the company, the sustainability of society, and the sustainability of the planet are totally interconnected.