Lex Fridman Podcast full episode: • Pavel Durov: Telegram, Freedom, Censorship...
Thank you for listening ❤ Check out our sponsors: https://lexfridman.com/sponsors/cv933...
See below for guest bio, links, and to give feedback, submit questions, contact Lex, etc.
GUEST BIO:
Pavel Durov is the founder and CEO of Telegram.
CONTACT LEX:
Feedback - give feedback to Lex: https://lexfridman.com/survey
AMA - submit questions, videos or call-in: https://lexfridman.com/ama
Hiring - join our team: https://lexfridman.com/hiring
Other - other ways to get in touch: https://lexfridman.com/contact
EPI...
So another feature on the more serious side is end-to-end encryption. You led the industry in that—it was launched one year and three months ahead. Can you speak to why you decided to add end-to-end encryption? How you developed the encryption algorithm in the beginning? What was your thinking behind that?
So in 2013, when we were launching Telegram, we were aware of the serious issue with privacy that Edward Snowden made very clear. And we thought, yes, we're designing this product in a way that is already extremely secure, but we want to make sure that not even we can access user messages. And we understood very clearly that a bunch of people who were born in Russia don't necessarily inspire trust. So that's why we made Telegram open source—all our apps have been available on GitHub since 2013. And then we added end-to-end encryption in our secret chats, which WhatsApp copied a few years after—one year and three months ahead. They just started to test it. They rolled it out, I think, in 2016, which is three years after us. And the only reason, I think, the rest of the industry had to do it is because we set the standard.
It was incredibly important back in the day. At the same time, we realized certain limitations of end-to-end encryption. Within that design, that architecture, you can't support very large chat communities with persistent chat histories. You can't support huge one-to-many channels. You'd have issues with maintaining bots that have lots of incoming messages. Multiple device support becomes tricky. People will end up losing some of the documents they share. So we also saw those issues, and we ended up having this sort of hybrid experience where, depending on your use case and your requirements, you can choose the level of encryption that you want to have. That's why we chose to go opt-in for end-to-end encryption.
So the trade-off you're describing is between, for people who really care about specific messages, extreme privacy on those messages, and usability—like being able to sync across multiple devices, having groups that are 200,000 people. All those quality-of-life features—there's a trade-off between those and end-to-end encryption. So you lean towards letting users enable end-to-end encryption for cases when they want to be super secure.
3 more exchanges in this transcript
Sign in free to read the rest of this interview. No card required.