Back
Andrew Clarke
Global President, Mars Snacking (Mars Wrigley), Wm. Wrigley Jr. Company (Mars Wrigley)

HGS #7: Andrew Clarke talks about growth and the role of marketing today

🎥 Sep 18, 2020 📺 Institute for Real Growth ⏱ 60m
... the next hour i have with me andrew clark global president of mars wrigley and let me tell you a little bit about mars mars is been ...
Watch on YouTube
Transcript (58 segments)
F
Franklin Hendrice0:01
Good morning, good afternoon, and good evening to all viewers from all around the world. My name is Franklin Hendrice. I work with the Institute for Real Growth, which features weekly humanized growth series webinars. The purpose of the institute is to help chief marketing officers and other growth leaders drive more humanized growth by connecting them to peers, thought leadership, and experts. That's exactly what we're going to do in the next hour. I have with me Andrew Clarke, global president of Mars Wrigley. Let me tell you a little bit about Mars. Mars has been around for more than 100 years, with over 125,000 associates, and the businesses cover pet care, food, and Mars Wrigley. Andrew, you're a lifer at Mars. You spent the first 20 years in category and sales leadership roles, then became chief customer officer of Mars global, and later added the CMO job to that, which is a really interesting perspective. Two years ago, you became the global president for all of Mars Wrigley. In the next hour, we'll talk about your view on growth from the perspective of a very large family-owned company, and the opportunity for marketing. It's especially interesting to hear your perspective from a sales and general management background. I think it was about six years ago that we met, both invited by WPP for a tour through Silicon Valley, visiting all the big tech players. The only thing I forgot was to buy some shares. Very warm welcome, Andrew. Great to have you here. Let me start by asking you: where are you and how are you?
A
Andrew Clarke2:35
Hi Frank, hi everyone. I'm well, thank you. I'm sitting here in Chicago, the home of Mars Wrigley, in the same room for the last six months. Your home office looks a lot more interesting than mine. I'm pleased to say I'm doing well, my family is doing well, children are back to school, and I'm very much looking forward to the conversation.
F
Franklin Hendrice3:06
Yeah, great. This used to be my office, but my wife is a therapist and she kicked me out, so this is a room that sees a lot of emotions. Andrew, what I remember from that trip through Silicon Valley is that we visited some clear outperformers but also the likes of Yahoo that are not around anymore. I noticed three fundamental differences: the outperformers were all super ambitious, almost aggressive, but at the same time humble. I remember Phil Schindler from Google saying we're positively paranoid, never underestimating what's coming. The third element was that they were extremely clear about their purpose. So I don't know if you recognize that, but I'm mostly interested to hear to what extent these three characteristics apply to the Mars Wrigley business.
A
Andrew Clarke5:03
I agree, it was an incredibly insightful trip. I think it's a great question. I'd start with Mars Inc. rather than Mars Wrigley. This business has been around for well over 100 years; the founders were truly entrepreneurial. It's still a family business today, and that permeates the DNA. The courage, long-term thinking, clarity of vision and purpose, and the humbleness—I totally recognize that. In many ways, that's the reason I've stayed for 20 years at Mars—the ability to make a difference for the long run.
F
Franklin Hendrice5:54
So how much of your time do you spend nurturing or fostering those characteristics at Mars Wrigley?
A
Andrew Clarke6:04
Literally every day, every moment, every interaction. The business is founded on five principles. The history of the five principles goes back to 1947, when Forrest Senior wrote a letter about mutuality of benefits and services. That was ahead of his time—stakeholders across the whole chain, not just profit. That mutuality of economics permeates everything we do day in and day out.
F
Franklin Hendrice7:55
Very good timing. We just signed the United Nations Global Compact as a new partner to the institute, and this would be a great addition. I remember visiting Mars offices and always seeing the plaque with the five principles. So have they remained the same over time?
A
Andrew Clarke8:32
Not only in every facility, but literally in every office on the wall. They are very much alive and well today across geographies, cultures, businesses, and generations. That unites our 125,000 associates and all our external partners. For listeners, the five principles are: quality, efficiency, mutuality, responsibility, and freedom. The two most distinctive are mutuality and freedom, given we're a private business for over 100 years.
F
Franklin Hendrice9:29
I find that super interesting. I had a conversation with Michael Green, CEO and founder of Human Rights First. He said purpose changes over time, but values are rock solid. Is that something you agree with, or do you see your value set changing as you mature?
A
Andrew Clarke10:09
That's a great question. The principles have been the foundation for decades, but the purpose—mutuality of benefits, mutuality of economics—has been the guiding purpose of Mars. In today's world, that's more relevant than ever. We're going through difficult times that call capitalism into question. Mutuality of economics was ahead of its time in 1947, and we haven't cracked it yet. Having clear principles is vital, but we've always had a clear purpose, which we've now articulated more sharply to enable our associates to rally behind.
F
Franklin Hendrice11:36
Exactly what I want to talk about next. I wrote down: 'We believe the world we want tomorrow starts with how we do business today.' That's the articulation of the Mars purpose. So is there one Mars purpose, or do the different businesses like food and Mars Wrigley have different purposes, and the brands have different purposes?
A
Andrew Clarke12:02
Yes, yes, and yes. They all ladder back to the Mars Inc. purpose. I worked on that purpose as CMO in 2017. Each segment business has its own purpose. For pet care: 'A better world for pets.' For Mars Wrigley: 'Better moments, more smiles.' And then down to the brand level—for example, Pedigree's 'Feed the good' ladders back to the Mars Inc. purpose. Authenticity is key all the way through.
F
Franklin Hendrice13:14
The literature on purpose always says leaders and employees should align their own purpose with the business. To what extent is that the case for you? Did you define your own purpose in life?
A
Andrew Clarke13:45
I'd sound super smart if I said yes, but in reality it evolves. When I reflect over my 20 years at Mars, the reason I've stayed is the personal fit with the five principles. I've been the beneficiary of leadership training that helped define my purpose. For me, it's about the ability to make a difference—with the teams I lead, the associates I work with, all in service of building a better business and a better legacy to hand over to my successor. I remember presenting at a session where I had worked with Fiona on Whiskas' brand purpose. We had this beautiful 'nurture nature' idea. The CEO and board were there, and I asked whether purpose for brands is an add-on or an integral part. We agreed to disagree.
F
Franklin Hendrice15:52
But what would your answer be, Andrew, to that?
A
Andrew Clarke15:55
The CEO at the time was Paul Michaels. We've got brilliant examples where it's completely congruent—Whiskas, Pedigree, Maltesers, Skittles. But we haven't got it for every brand. When you get it right, it's magic. Pedigree is a great example. It was one of our biggest brands struggling for relevancy, and getting clear on purpose drove a host of creativity. It's now multi-award winning and getting fantastic growth. When you get it right, it gives you freedom. In COVID times, because we were crystal clear on what brands stand for, it gave us permission to move quickly.
F
Franklin Hendrice18:04
I couldn't agree more. So to what extent do you involve yourself with the purpose and activation of the brands?
A
Andrew Clarke18:24
Of course. In Mars Wrigley, I take a keen interest and a sponsorship role for marketing across Mars Inc. I work closely with the other CMOs. For Mars Wrigley, absolutely. The brands are the lifeblood of the business. We have five brands above a billion dollars in Mars Wrigley, and many with potential to grow. I'm proud of our marketing talent. Combined with long-term agency partnerships, it gives us a competitive advantage. We have yearly sessions to review creative, which gives a connection point for our associates and allows us to connect the dots across the organization.
F
Franklin Hendrice19:55
Let me throw in a million-dollar question: growth. How do you define growth—personally or as a business?
A
Andrew Clarke20:09
I'm pleased to say we have real alignment on this. Over the last five years, we've gotten increasing clarity. For a family business, it's critical. We define growth across four dimensions: first, strong financial performance—without it, you can't do anything else. Second, quality of growth—making sure our brands, markets, and categories are in tailwinds, relevant for the future. Third, trusted partner—how trusted are we with all stakeholders, starting with our associates, then suppliers, customers, NGOs. Fourth, positive societal impact—sustainability, like cocoa for generations. Our long-term incentive for senior leadership is balanced across these four, leading to difficult trade-off conversations, but it allows us to be true to our purpose and the shareholders' ambitions.
F
Franklin Hendrice22:27
That's a clear answer, but I find it interesting that you start with financial performance. I believe financial performance is a result of the other three. In our leadership program, we discuss that people say the right things, but 90% of conversations are about next quarter's budget. Mars is not an exception. When I owned my company, our KPIs were on client relationships, not turnover. I read that the CEO of Taobao in China says the key KPI is the number of jobs created through the platform. So the order is important. How much do you talk about top line versus quality of relationships in your town halls? Do you steer on the right order?
A
Andrew Clarke24:19
The idea is the tension between the four. As our CEO Grant says, purpose without performance means you can't do it. You need strong financial performance for freedom to stay private. Then it's what you choose to do with that performance. That's where the other three are critical—investing for the long run, facing into challenges like cocoa and plastics, building long-term partnerships. We measure that. Our agency partnerships have been around for decades. Those are important artifacts of what Mars is about. But you have to have strong financial performance to give you that freedom.
F
Franklin Hendrice25:45
Hey Andrew, to all viewers, there is the possibility to ask questions. I'm going to read the first question from Simon, an associate at Mars, in a moment. But just maybe to help the audience: Andrew, what question should I really not ask you?
A
Andrew Clarke26:11
I would just go through, Frank. This is a nice fireside chat. If there's a very difficult question, I'll say that's the one. I'm hoping Simon, given he's an associate, he's not going to ask me that.
F
Franklin Hendrice26:28
He does have a question related to growth. He talks about challenges with technology and changing ways we manage supply chains, and he wants to know about the role of human-technology partnerships from the perspective of the need to upskill and train associates on new ways of working. How do you have a view on this?
A
Andrew Clarke27:01
We're all learning every day as the world changes. Mars Wrigley is on a very fast digitization journey. I was fortunate as CMO to be thrown into that turbulence when digital was ramping up. We made significant investments in talent and external hires, and looked at partnerships to get the best blend. For example, Sandeep joined as chief digital officer and has been a brilliant disruptor and collaborator, attracting fantastic talent. On the human side, we bring in talent where needed—we just made a senior hire in media. We also reskill existing teams. Technology enables this across the supply chain, from factory associates using AI trainers and virtual reality training, especially during COVID. We've seen the lowest safety issues because of the safety culture. We're putting in place different ways of working, like agile teams dedicated to innovation projects with metered funding, enabled by digital and data. It's a combination of testing, learning, sprinting, and bringing in expertise, all in service of reinventing the business. We haven't cracked it completely, but we're seeing fantastic progress and green shoots.
F
Franklin Hendrice29:57
You mentioned the chief digital officer and all these digital transformations happening in basically all companies. The way I look at it, any digital transformation that doesn't put the customer journey at its heart is a missed opportunity. It can still lead to increased efficiencies, but it's a missed opportunity. In our program, we talk about...
How what a role is and how you make sure you're in the driver's seat or next to the driver's seat as a marketing function, being the voice of the outside world and the customer very specifically or consumer. To what extent is marketing deeply involved or in the driver's seat of these digital transformations happening?
A
Andrew Clarke31:03
Uh, Mars. By the way, it's a good point. I failed to mention on my last answer really the user centricity elements, consumer centricity as we would call it, customer journey as you would call it, it's fundamental. Any investment has to follow a consumer and a use case, driving a test and an agenda. So that's another component to Simon's question. I think from a CMO marketing perspective, absolutely fundamental. The big advantage I had moving into the CMO role was that the timing was hugely challenging but very energizing given the level of disruption. The role of our CMOs now is being architects of growth and real change agents, bringing external confusion into the business and turning that into compelling strategies with a bias for action. There are brilliant examples of partnerships with digital teams. Clarence Mack, our CMO for food, is now President for China, bringing his knowledge of marketing and digital disruption. Leonid Sudikov, CMO for pet care, now President of Kinship, leading digital disruption. I see the CMO role as growth architect, translator, and ability to drive change.
F
Franklin Hendrice33:30
So I hear that a lot of things go really well at Mars Wrigley. What is the most important pitfall for marketers, not per se Mars Wrigley, but more broadly? What's the biggest watch out? The one thing you would always push marketers to do less or more of?
A
Andrew Clarke33:54
Yeah, it's a great question, Frank. I have a slightly different vantage point. I consider myself a business marketer who came into the CMO role with a customer and general management background. The advantage was being able to ask the difficult questions and drive a disruptive agenda. My encouragement for all CMOs is to think enterprise and break the silos. If there's one function that can do that, it's marketing. It's at the heart of everything. I encourage CMOs to take that broader leadership, be a growth architect, break the silos, and create the environment to drive change.
F
Franklin Hendrice35:14
Like a very practical actionable example of that. What was an intervention that one of these CMOs either in Mars regularly or outside that you would say really breaks down the barriers? Because that is the biggest barrier to growth. Bain did a study, 90% of CEOs said the biggest barrier is internal dysfunction, the silos. So what have you seen or done yourself that was so effective in breaking down those silos?
A
Andrew Clarke35:59
When you use the examples, they sound so obvious, yet the multiplier effects are enormous. I'll give a current example from China. Clarence and his team combined factors: M&M's is our biggest brand, we have a store in Shanghai, an innovation facility, factory supply network, customer partnerships with Alibaba and Tencent, and the best sales force coverage. We connected the whole ecosystem with data at the center, linking innovation on M&M's with Alibaba's Tmall platform, our stores, our digital ecosystem, and our route to market. That required vision, partnerships, and courage. Clarence and his team drove it to the next level. That's one example, but I could pick plenty.
F
Franklin Hendrice37:55
Good, thank you. I want to share a question from Saffron Inkster. What's the primary metric of success for your brands from a marketing perspective, and how important is brand love?
A
Andrew Clarke38:11
That's a great question, Saffron. We have a suite of metrics, but the most important is penetration. I'm a big believer in the Laws of Growth and evidence-based marketing. It's about making sure our brands remain relevant for consumers of today and tomorrow. Where we haven't focused on recruitment and penetration, we've lost a generation. So if I pick one, it's penetration.
F
Franklin Hendrice39:00
Andrew, explain to me. Every leader I've spoken to at Mars starts mentioning the Laws of Growth and Ehrenberg Bass work. How is it possible that you then forget about penetration or don't put enough attention to it? That's almost the way it feels. How is it possible this is not enough on the radar?
A
Andrew Clarke39:37
I didn't say it wasn't on the radar, Frank. I said it's the most important metric, but there have been occasions where we lost focus. It's a reminder that in a big organization you need a growth philosophy. The laws are evidence-based but counterintuitive. As the world evolves, we ask what changes with digital or loyalty. What I found fascinating was combining the evidence-based laws with behavioral leadership. We looked at our top 60 markets over seven years to see what units consistently outperformed. The evidence was part of it, but other factors like enterprise thinking, uncommon collaboration, and staying the course were critical. Staying the course is the number one. But even with the science, we often lack the courage to back the long term. We created a program called Growth Legacy combining these elements, and it's working well.
F
Franklin Hendrice42:48
Great. And that's something you have driven. I think that sounds really interesting, this Growth Legacy approach.
A
Andrew Clarke42:59
Yeah, it's something I'm passionate about and sponsor, championed by the CMO group. We're putting our best talent on it. Michael McGee, who ran senior marketing for Europe, now runs the program reporting into Mars Wrigley.
F
Franklin Hendrice43:18
Great. I want to do one more from the viewers. Rebecca Lyons asks: How do you feel category leadership has helped put shopper and consumer at the heart of Mars business? Rebecca has a good background in Mars, so probably a leading question, but a great one.
A
Andrew Clarke43:49
Funnily enough, my first job at Mars was category leadership. I'm passionate that category leadership needs to be the centerpiece. Getting the portfolio strategy right linked to a category vision and translating that through the whole business is paramount. It connects the consumer all the way back to the supplier. We haven't always got that completely through the value chain.
F
Franklin Hendrice44:26
Yeah, she's confirming that in writing.
I want to talk about what happened at Mars Wrigley when COVID hit. The Institute for Real Growth helps CMOs shift from short-term shareholder focus to long-term all-stakeholder focus. Pre-COVID, prime focus was capital markets and consumer. COVID shifted it to colleagues and communities first. With Mars being family-owned and having principles of mutuality, have you seen a shift in focus on specific stakeholders?
A
Andrew Clarke45:56
I'd describe this as bringing out the best of Mars. We're good in a crisis. We broke it into phases: first, protecting associates and communities. Second, doubling down on business continuity, keeping factories running and distributing products. We saw huge growth in pet and food businesses, and a shift to digitization and planned purchases. Third, how to come out stronger. We invested in communities with gestures like thank you packs from M&M's and donations to the NHS. We stood by our associates. We're learning to do things differently. For example, Royal Canin's veterinary symposium normally had a few thousand attendees; this week we had 45,000 registered online. That drives reach and helps the industry. It's been hugely taxing but brings out the best. It makes me proud to be part of Mars.
F
Franklin Hendrice49:10
You mentioned the shift towards digital. Simon Sadie asks: We've seen the digital age brings dangers like hate speech and consumer privacy challenges. How do you embrace the growth these platforms bring while maintaining your principles?
A
Andrew Clarke50:04
Very relevant question. Principles come first. We have a responsibility to be part of the solution. Many platforms are strategic partners. We worked through GARM with other players for more transparency and auditing. We paused some investments, which came at a profit cost, but it was the right choice. We're now comfortable with the roadmaps. The decision put societal choice before profit choice, and we saw declines in some digitally native businesses, but that proves the platform works. Internally, these are difficult conversations, but I'm proud we did the right thing.
F
Franklin Hendrice51:57
So it's about balancing profits and principles. What's your biggest regret or learning from those tough choices?
A
Andrew Clarke52:25
The learning is to take the long-term decision even when it's hard. I talk to John Mars regularly, and he inspires me to see the long term. My regret is not going faster on long-term bets. The how-to is test and learn: place bets that don't cost a fortune, prove them, then scale. Reflecting over two years, I should have put more money there, been bolder, moved resources quicker. That's a reminder to be stronger and bolder next time.
F
Franklin Hendrice54:28
This comes down to real leadership. How would you describe yourself as a leader? Or how would others describe you?
A
Andrew Clarke54:39
It's better for others to describe you. I'd say I'm a leader that continues to learn, passionate about learning. In my early career I learned to lead; now I lead to learn. I build great teams and am future-oriented. Third, I'm driven by legacy: building a business better than the one I inherited. I want to hand over a team and culture I'm proud of. The most important thing is learning and continuing to learn.
F
Franklin Hendrice55:44
I read Bob Chapman's Everybody Matters, which says every employee matters and it's about creating the right context. I floated that with venture capitalists; they said kick people out if they don't work immediately. Where are you on that scale?
A
Andrew Clarke56:33
The most important thing is to create the environment and clarity of vision. Building the team inevitably involves some changes. I've made significant changes in my team, but I'm proud of the blend we have now—internal promotions and external hires, balanced by gender, geography, ethnicity. My responsibility is to build the team and create the environment. That does mean changing players at times. I'm a different leader to my predecessor, and there'll be a time for someone else. It's about creating the environment where people can be at their best.
F
Franklin Hendrice57:54
Hard to argue. We're almost at the end. If there's one thing you want people to take away from this conversation, what would it be?
A
Andrew Clarke58:17
Be obsessively curious. Every interaction, every person you speak to—learn from them. Then continue to reinvent.
F
Franklin Hendrice58:40
Great. And what did you learn from this conversation?
A
Andrew Clarke58:46
Oh crikey. I think the ability to talk with someone like-minded about what's possible. It makes me think about the audience and the brilliance in other businesses. Proudly tell our story, but also learn from others to blend brilliance for a better future.
F
Franklin Hendrice59:30
Well, Andrew, thank you very much. It was a very open and honest conversation. Undoubtedly people took a lot more out than just your point about learning. I did for sure. To the viewers, this was the first one since summer pause. Next week I'm talking with Elena Rosenfeld, founder and CEO of Kicking Horse Coffee, a much smaller business bought by Lavazza because of its clearly articulated purpose. She's inspirational. Thank you for your questions, sometimes difficult ones. I wish everyone a lovely end of the day and a great weekend. Thank you, Andrew.
A
Andrew Clarke59:44
Thanks, Frank. Thanks everyone.