Back
Mark Pincus
Former Founder of Zynga, Zynga

Consumer Side of AI Currently Underweighted, Says Mark Pincus

🎥 Feb 10, 2025 📺 Bloomberg Podcasts ⏱ 10m 👁 660 views
Zynga founder Mark Pincus said that the consumer side of AI is being underweighted in comparison to the engineering and coding aspects of the technology and that capping the consumer influence is not in line with the the way the internet has developed. Pincus said that while most of AI is still a 'single player experience,' it is going to massively change our labor market and economy as it further develops. -------- Watch Bloomberg Radio LIVE on YouTube Weekdays 7am-6pm ET Saturday & Sunday 7am-10am ET WATCH HERE: http://bit.ly/3vTiACF Follow us on X:   / bloombergradio   Subscribe to our...
Watch on YouTube

About Mark Pincus

Mark Pincus has been promoting his book "Life at the Speed of Play: Launch Products People Love," published in June 2026. In numerous podcast appearances, he has discussed his "Proven, Better, New" framework for product development, which he described as a "cheat code" that can improve a founder's odds of success. Pincus argued that founders should study and copy successful products before attempting innovation, stating that "the best masters of the craft are the best at copying" and that "all new fails." He also discussed his view that the consumer technology sector is currently "not investable" due to distribution challenges, but said the opportunity to build new consumer products has "never been greater" because of advances in AI and agents. Pincus described himself as an "AI maximalist" and said the consumer side of AI is being "underweighted" compared to enterprise and coding applications. He predicted a transition from a "knowledge worker economy" to a "prompt worker" economy. Pincus also discussed his investment approach, including co-founding a fund called Reinvent with Reid Hoffman focused on finding venture-like returns in mature companies. He noted that he publicly supported Donald Trump before the 2024 election, a decision he said cost him some friendships but that he was "happy" his past self took that stand.

Source: AI-verified profile updated from Mark Pincus's recent appearances. Browse all interviews →

Transcript (16 segments)
I
Interviewer0:00
We are with Mark Pincus. He's the founder of Zynga and the author of the new book out this week, Life at the Speed of Play: Launch Products People Love. I want to pick up with a headline we just heard from Amy. It's from The New York Times about how OpenAI is leaning toward waiting until next year for its IPO. Rob Copeland and Mike Isaac reporting that they're holding off on their initial public offering until next year. Three people involved in the company's deliberations said it punctuates an uncertain future for fast-rising AI giants. Mark, you're an investor in OpenAI. You understand what it's like to take a company public. You did that with several companies in different periods of your professional life.
M
Mark Pincus0:42
Right. Sure, yes. Like the last day of the dot-com IPO window.
I
Interviewer0:46
Yeah. Just your thoughts on OpenAI and its path to becoming a public company.
M
Mark Pincus0:57
On the one hand, I'm not sure how much the timing matters other than if it changes their access to capital. I don't think they can afford to get significantly behind in the capital and build-out race. But it's not clear that you have to necessarily go public these days. And if you look at the sizes of investments, I think OpenAI is just an amazing generational company. And I think people who count them out and say this is all Anthropic are shortsighted. I think OpenAI has to catch up on the coding side. They think we'll see that happen with Codex. And they have a clear advantage on the consumer side, which I think is currently being underweighted. I think people wrongly think this is all just about coding and enterprise, and that is where the action is right now. That's where the most revenue growth is right now. But there's no question in my mind that the consumer side of AI will be just as big, if not bigger. So Citi put out a report calling it a $6 trillion market. And I thought it was interesting that they capped consumer at $500 billion out of $6 trillion. That doesn't make sense to me. $2 trillion just for the engineering and coding side? No, that doesn't make any sense to me. That's not the way we've seen the internet play out.
I
Interviewer2:37
You seem to be someone who can think super big about things. How should we be thinking about AI and how it changes our world as consumers? How is it going to change things at home, at work, at play? Is it just another amped-up way of communicating online? How do you think about it?
M
Mark Pincus3:00
It's not a way to communicate online yet, because it's still oddly a single-player experience, right? We're not in the GPT chats together. But if you break your question down, first, how will it impact our jobs and the job market? I think we're very, very quickly transitioning from a knowledge worker economy to something else. We don't have a name for it, but it's going to be a prompt worker. It's going to be about being generative. Whatever our job is, it's going to change very quickly. It's probably changed a lot for you guys, right? The amount of leverage we get—it's moving from a value on knowledge to a value on questions and curiosity. But you also have to have knowledge to ask a smart question, for sure.
I
Interviewer4:02
We are learning to, and we talk about this a lot. I forget who it was, but one of the interviews we recently had, a really good question with AI is going to be several paragraphs long, right? If you really want to get smart, useful information.
M
Mark Pincus4:14
You guys both impressively read my book and you have great questions. And I think if you'd relied on AI—and I'll say even writing the book, I had this love-hate relationship with AI. At first it's magical, and you're like, 'Oh my God, it can take this long talk I just gave and condense it,' or our editing is so painful, wordsmithing. And then you start reading it and it starts to get homogenized, it starts to feel soulless, and it's like, where did my voice go? And I even tried a style guide, like, 'I want you to sound like my voice.' And eventually I was like, I don't want to change my words unless you absolutely have to. And then eventually I said, you know what? It's really helpful for some things. It's part of a process to take a long talk and condense it, to make it more organized. But I started to really kind of, like a vinyl record, appreciate the imperfections of how I talk and say, you know what? That's my voice. And that's how you know it is me.
I
Interviewer5:13
A major theme in the book is making decisions that your future self will respect. You have this framework, the Book of Life, which I think is a really important way to set up the book. I want to talk about that in the last couple of minutes. In the context of you being so public in 2024, coming out and saying, after so many years and millions of dollars donating to Democrats, 'I am now coming out in support of President Trump'—I was surprised, and I think a lot of people were, to see you do that. How did your Book of Life framework and your idea of looking back at that decision inform that decision at the time?
M
Mark Pincus5:48
It's such a good question. It's definitely not something I signed up for in my Book of Life. However, intellectual honesty is important to me, and being willing to take an unpopular stand. And I feel like if I can't do that, if I'm so scared because of groupthink and the consequences of taking a very unpopular position in a lot of my communities, then who can? And it was actually my daughter Georgia. I didn't decide until the Sunday before the election that I was going to vote for Trump. I decided I was definitely not going to vote for Kamala. I had lost faith in the Democrats and the mainstream media establishment, that whole process. But I was also being very transparent publicly on Twitter. I wrote a post in The Free Press saying—not that I support Trump—but that Biden at that time, in late July of '24, felt even riskier than Trump. And that alone started a shitstorm. So it's too late to take it back. But Georgia came to me on a Sunday before the election. She said, 'Dad, you know you're going to vote for Trump at this point.' And I said, 'Yeah, I think you're probably right.' She said, 'Then you have to tweet that, because you've been so open and transparent.' And I said, 'Yeah, you're right.' So then I wrote a whole post. I think the most viral post I've ever put up, because it was oddly a touchstone for a lot of people. I was kind of like this big Democratic donor breaking ranks, and it's part of being rank-and-file Silicon Valley founders. And so it was, I think, a little scary to some of the establishment to see this crumbling. I put the post out and my reasons out, and it was on the front page of the New York Post the next day. I didn't think it would be news. And it really was much louder than I anticipated. And I was like, you know what, if I'm going to do it, I'm not going to hide. It's silly that we should have to hide our political views because we're tagged with an identity. And I'll just say this: I'm not on any team. I said that throughout. I'm not on Team Democrats. I'm not on Team MAGA. It sounds cheesy, but I'm Team America. I'm Team my family and community. And in this environment where we just saw three pretty extreme left democratic socialists win in New York, I don't know that any of us can really say we're identified with one party, because who the party is has really shifted. I'm a Chicago liberal. I've always been that. I'm socially liberal—I want people to have their own rights and freedoms—and I'm fiscally and economically conservative. I want to see responsible government. I think I'm stating some obvious things here that 80%, 90% of people agree with. And so for that to then define me as far right—and to hear a journalist say, 'I need to find a far-right founder in San Francisco. Can I interview you?' And I'm like, 'You want me? I'm far right?' I'm still here. Nothing's changed. So yeah, the part about my future self is—even though it was painful and there were some dislocations and I did lose a couple of dear friendships over it—I am happy that Mark 2024 took a stand.
I
Interviewer10:13
God, I feel like that's a perfect place to wrap.
M
Mark Pincus10:16
You don't really want to wrap.
I
Interviewer10:18
We hope you will come back. This is really fun.
M
Mark Pincus10:18
And I was not expecting you guys to have read my whole book and have all of these really insightful questions. I hope you guys follow the format of my book. I hope that you take an idea, prosecute it, and as a side hustle you build a huge business, and then this becomes your hobby.
I
Interviewer10:42
I love it. You give us a lot to think about. And I have to tell you, we still have a bunch of questions. I mean it, please come back.
M
Mark Pincus10:48
I would love it. Love it.