CEOInterviews.AI
Start App
Patrick Pouyanné
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, TotalEnergies SE

Coquerel vs. Pouyanné: The TotalEnergies boss dismantles the hearing

📅 Jun 18, 2026 HEMICYCLE MEDIA 25 MIN 13265 VIEWS 42 SEGMENTS · 3 SPEAKERS
▶️ DON'T MISS — ESTROSI: his €300,000 staircase ("€20,000 per step") 👉    • ESTROSI : son escalier à 300 000 € révélé ...   ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ On Wednesday, June 17, 2026, Patrick Pouyanné, CEO of TotalEnergies, was questioned by the Finance Committee of the National Assembly. Éric Coquerel, chairman of the committee, questioned the oil company about global profits of €5 billion in the first quarter (+51%), €500 million in France alone, tripled refining margins, and a trading operation valued at $1 billion by the Financial Times against the backdrop of the Strait of Hormuz crisis. Pouyan...

What Patrick Pouyanné said

Written from the verified transcript and checked against it. Every figure links to the moment it was said.

Patrick Pouyanné, TotalEnergies' CEO, faced Éric Coquerel in a parliamentary hearing. He said he did not know France-specific profit figures but confirmed the refining margin was high, around $13-14 per barrel, triple the historical average of $5-6. He attributed this to the Strait of Hormuz crisis, noting China and the US absorbed 60% of the oil supply shock. He defended the company's voluntary price cap, estimating it cost roughly €200 million so far, and rejected government-administered price controls. He said the cap on petrol remains in effect for 2,000 stations and a €2.09 diesel cap for 1,000 stations over Father's Day weekend. He acknowledged a 15% volume increase at TotalEnergies stations. He denied calling the oil trading operation speculation, saying it was market observation, and noted trading results were about 500 million higher than usual. He said TotalEnergies would comply with any legal exceptional levy and would pay more taxes in 2026, mostly to producing countries. He defended the tax transparency report, covering 70 countries, and said Switzerland and Singapore might be added in future.

Key takeaways

  1. Refining margin is $13-14 per barrel, triple the historical average of $5-6, due to the Strait of Hormuz crisis.
  2. The voluntary price cap has cost TotalEnergies roughly €200 million so far and remains in effect for 2,000 petrol stations.
  3. TotalEnergies' oil trading made about 500 million more than usual in Q1 2026, which Pouyanné called market observation, not speculation.
  4. Pouyanné said TotalEnergies will pay more taxes in 2026, but mostly to producing countries, and will comply with any legal exceptional levy.
  5. The tax transparency report covers 70 countries, and Switzerland and Singapore may be added in future years.

Numbers and commitments

FigureWhat it refers toTypeAt
$13-14 per barrel Current refining margin metric 1:57
$5-6 Historical average refining margin metric 1:57
10 million barrels per day Oil supply lost due to Strait of Hormuz crisis metric 1:57
4 million barrels per day China's reduction in oil imports metric 1:57
2 million more barrels per day US increase in oil exports metric 1:57
60% Share of oil supply shock absorbed by China and US metric 1:57
25% Share of French diesel imported from Middle East metric 1:57
€200 million Cost of voluntary price cap so far commitment 6:23
15% Increase in volumes at TotalEnergies stations metric 11:21
2,000 stations Stations still benefiting from €1.99 petrol cap metric 8:07

Chapters

  1. 0:00France-specific profit figures
  2. 1:03Refining margins and crisis impact
  3. 5:50Price cap cost and continuation
  4. 7:34Rejecting government price controls
  5. 11:03Market share gains from price cap
  6. 14:01Oil trading profits and speculation
  7. 16:55Exceptional contribution and taxes
  8. 20:19Tax transparency report and Switzerland

Questions asked in this interview

10
  1. 5:08That was on April 29th, which also explained TotalEnergies' exceptional margins in the first quarter. Would you say that again?
  2. 5:50And what are your profits over the period, net of that revenue shortfall? Do you have any idea?
  3. 6:06The cap you decided on for distribution in France?
  4. 6:45Do you have any idea of that?
  5. 7:34Don't you think that would be both feasible for you and good for the economy?
  6. 11:03Do you have any figures on that?
  7. 12:42Can we therefore expect pump prices to fall just as quickly as they rose?
  8. 14:01What profit did Total make on this operation — which can fairly be described as trading — and which had little to do with, I would say, a consequence purely of supply issues or the war, but was rather a consequence of speculation?
  9. 16:55... entity — in this case TotalEnergies in France — is making windfall profits during this period, some people consider it normal — and I am among them — that in one way or another, you should contribute to offsetting what this war has cost?
  10. 17:59... think that among the various players affected by the war, and in your case you are affected positively — the numbers speak for themselves — don't you think it is fair, in some sense, that you could be asked for an exceptional contribution?
Narrator 0:00 ↗
Facing Patrick Pouyanné, Éric Coquerel wanted to corner TotalEnergies on its profits, margins, and taxes, but the hearing quickly took a different turn.
Subscribe, like, share, and hit the notification bell to follow our parliamentary analysis.
Éric Coquerel 0:22 ↗
So I have a first question about your profits. In the first quarter, worldwide profits came to nearly 5 billion euros, up 51% compared to Q1 2025. I'd like, this time for France specifically, to ask you the same questions about your profits from March 1 to June 1, 2026. So for France, if possible broken down between refining and distribution, and compared with the exact same period in 2025. In the economic affairs committee, your representative — not you — stated that the refining margin for March, for example, was exceptionally strong that month. Distribution was significantly lower in March compared to January, which had a public holiday. I assume, therefore, that you have the figures.
Patrick Pouyanné 1:03 ↗
I don't know France's fiscal result. What I can tell you is that the margin was indeed high — we've made no secret of that. In fact, it's still high. The refining margin today is $13 per barrel.
Éric Coquerel 1:15 ↗
I'm not asking for fiscal figures. I'm asking about profits.
Patrick Pouyanné 1:18 ↗
Again, I know the global results. I don't know the France-specific results.
Éric Coquerel 1:22 ↗
France's first-level fiscal result is estimated at roughly 500 million euros for the first quarter.
And for March specifically?
Patrick Pouyanné 1:34 ↗
I don't know the March figure. I'm sorry, I don't have that. What I do know is that the refining margin was low in January and February. So most of it must come from March, to answer by inference.
Éric Coquerel 1:45 ↗
So there it is — 500 million euros. The margin did indeed rise with the crisis, which is actually surprising, because normally in our industry, when the oil price rises, refining margins tend to fall.
Patrick Pouyanné 1:57 ↗
That's why we talk about integration. So the oil price rose sharply, and the refining margin rose as well. It's still high. I checked this morning — it's close to $13–14 per barrel. The average over recent years has been $5 to $6. So as you can see, it's tripled. Why? Because the Strait of Hormuz crisis had two effects. It had an impact on crude oil, where roughly 10 million barrels per day could no longer reach the global market, which was largely offset, when you look at what's happened over the past three months, mainly by China. China significantly reduced its oil imports by 4 million barrels per day. In a sense, it helped the world — no doubt partly because it didn't want too strong an impact on the global economy and its own margins. China is essentially an export-driven economy. The United States also helped, as they drew heavily on their reserves. They exported 2 million more barrels per day than usual — going from 4 to 6 by drawing down their stockpiles. So those two countries absorbed roughly 60% of the oil supply shock. That's also why the price didn't spike as high as feared. And then, unfortunately, a second crisis emerged — the refined products crisis. The refined products crisis exists because Middle Eastern refineries, for instance, are far more modern and produce large quantities of diesel and kerosene. We depend on them — not just us, but especially Asia. Around 25% of the diesel consumed in France was imported from the Middle East. One category of products was hit proportionally harder on global markets: diesel and kerosene. Kerosene surged to nearly $200 per barrel and remains elevated — because reopening the Strait of Hormuz and resuming oil flows doesn't mean refineries are back online, and the situation will persist because, in the conflict, the Iranians didn't destroy oil production facilities, but they did strike refineries. In Saudi Arabia, for example, suffered three drone strikes and is currently running at only 70% capacity. Restoration work will likely extend well beyond the end of 2026. So refined products took a bigger hit, hence the margins — and they remain elevated, because yes, the oil price reacted to the US-Iran deal announcement and fell toward $80, but refining margins remain high. Meaning, logically, we had never seen such a phenomenon. A mechanism that, in the company's history, we'd seen both sides of. In 2022 we briefly saw this transitional phenomenon, where both parameters were pointing upward at the same time. So, to answer your question: 500 million euros in the first quarter — which is why I said in an interview that I expected we would be paying corporate income tax in 2026, if the year continues on this trajectory and our refineries keep running.
Éric Coquerel 4:54 ↗
Thank you. So you don't have the figures for March. Your representative, the Economic Affairs Committee, clearly had figures. You had also offered another explanation for the rise in margins. Mr. President, I doubt that.
Patrick Pouyanné 5:06 ↗
No, no, let me finish my sentence, if you don't mind.
Éric Coquerel 5:08 ↗
You gave a different explanation. You said it was your ability to capture the price increases. That was on April 29th, which also explained TotalEnergies' exceptional margins in the first quarter. Would you say that again?
Patrick Pouyanné 5:20 ↗
Of course — I just explained it. That's exactly what I just said. Our breakeven being at $25 a barrel. Again, we have built a company that is extremely resilient when prices are low. And when prices are higher, yes, as I have shown you, our profits are higher, and our taxes are higher as well. And it is the producing countries that benefit first. Which is quite normal — that is where we make our profits. So that is how the mechanism works, and I fully stand by it, including the statement I made.
Éric Coquerel 5:50 ↗
Alright. Can you tell us what the price cap you decided on has cost you? And what are your profits over the period, net of that revenue shortfall? Do you have any idea?
Patrick Pouyanné 6:02 ↗
Profits against revenue losses? Well, there are no profits — these are losses. They are losses.
Éric Coquerel 6:06 ↗
No, but I'll repeat my question. Let's get on the same page. I ask the question, you answer. Agreed? Thank you. So, can you tell us what the price cap has cost you? Since you said it did cost you something. The cap you decided on for distribution in France?
Patrick Pouyanné 6:23 ↗
For now, first of all, it is still ongoing. It isn't over. I know roughly where we stand today. And there are several ways to calculate it, since we can do it by reference to the average prices charged by our competitors. We can do it relative to what prices we would have charged independently of the crisis. We are at roughly €200 million today.
Éric Coquerel 6:39 ↗
Alright. Thank you.
Patrick Pouyanné 6:42 ↗
Roughly, because again, there is no precise accounting.
Éric Coquerel 6:45 ↗
Now, as you know, we proposed — when I say we, I mean the group I belong to — more of a price freeze by acting on refinery margins. Which is what the government did in 1990 — at the time, you had a very good year, despite lasting only a month. A proper price freeze. Have you by any chance calculated, by comparison, what such a mechanism would have cost you over the past period — that is, by capping prices at €1.70 per litre, which was the fuel price before the war broke out? Do you have any idea of that?

20 more exchanges in this transcript

Sign in free to read the rest of this interview. No card required.

Sign in to read the full transcript

Cite this transcript

APA, MLA, BibTeX
APA

Pouyanné, P. (2026, June 18). Coquerel vs. Pouyanné: The TotalEnergies boss dismantles the hearing [Interview transcript]. HEMICYCLE MEDIA. CEOInterviews.AI. https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/1042674/

MLA

Patrick Pouyanné. "Coquerel vs. Pouyanné: The TotalEnergies boss dismantles the hearing." HEMICYCLE MEDIA, 18 Jun. 2026. Transcript, CEOInterviews.AI, https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/1042674/.

BibTeX
@misc{pouyann2026_1042674,
  author       = {Patrick Pouyanné},
  title        = {Coquerel vs. Pouyanné: The TotalEnergies boss dismantles the hearing},
  howpublished = {Interview transcript, HEMICYCLE MEDIA. CEOInterviews.AI},
  year         = {2026},
  month        = {jun},
  url          = {https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/1042674/},
  note         = {Speaker-attributed transcript with timestamps}
}