Back
Rajiv Ramaswami
President & Chief Executive Officer (Board Member), Nutanix, Inc.

Nutanix Q3 2026 Earnings Call | Multi-Cloud Platform Migrations Drive Substantial Software ARR

🎥 May 26, 2026 📺 i101 ⏱ 55m
Nutanix Q3 2026 Earnings Conference Call. If you find our work useful, please support us by purchasing a Super Thanks— it truly ...
Watch on YouTube

About Rajiv Ramaswami

Rajiv Ramaswami, CEO of Nutanix, delivered the opening keynote at a company event in Chicago on July 7, 2026, where he discussed the company's platform roadmap and the impact of agentic AI. During the keynote, he described hypothetical AI agents for personal tasks such as regulating metabolism, expediting airport security, and managing email. In a conversation with a customer from the casino industry, Ramaswami noted that the customer planned to open a new resort using Nutanix's hypervisor and management tools, and that the customer's CEO was driving AI adoption across guest-facing experiences, personalization, and operational efficiency. Ramaswami also criticized VMware and Broadcom, stating that Broadcom is "forcing you to buy the full stack" and "capturing the maximum amount of profits," and urged customers to consider whether that is where they want to invest. He added that Nutanix aims to help customers "reduce your dependence" on such vendors and "meet your current and future needs with a modern platform." On the company's Q3 2026 earnings call on May 26, 2026, Ramaswami said Nutanix sees demand driven by businesses modernizing IT, adopting hybrid cloud models, and deploying cloud-native applications including AI. He noted that AMD recently invested up to $250 million in Nutanix and that the companies are working on joint solutions with AMD GPUs. Regarding hardware supply, Ramaswami stated that lead times for appliance vendors range from a few weeks to six months depending on configuration and vendor, and that Nutanix expects hardware prices to remain elevated into fiscal year 2027. He also attributed a higher average contract duration in Q3 to a mix of larger, longer-duration transactions across land, expand, and renewals.

Source: AI-verified profile updated from Rajiv Ramaswami's recent appearances. Browse all interviews →

Transcript (80 segments)
O
Operator0:00
Hello and welcome to Nutanix's third quarter 2026 earnings conference call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speaker's presentation, there will be a question and answer session. To ask a question during the session, you will need to press star one on your telephone. You will then hear an automated message advising your hand is raised. To withdraw your question, please press star one again. We ask that you limit yourself to one question and one follow-up.
I would now like to hand the conference over to Rich Valera, vice president of investor relations. You may begin.
R
Rich Valera0:39
Good afternoon and welcome to today's conference call to discuss third quarter fiscal year 2026 financial results. Joining me today are Rajiv Ramaswami, Nutanix's CEO, and Rukmini Sivaraman, Nutanix's CFO. After the market closed today, Nutanix issued a press release announcing third quarter fiscal year 2026 financial results. If you'd like to read the release, please visit the press releases section of our IR website. During today's call, management will make forward-looking statements, including financial guidance. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, some of which are beyond our control, which could cause actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated by these statements. For more detailed description of these and other risks and uncertainties, please refer to our SEC filings, including our most recent annual report on Form 10-K and our subsequent quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, as well as our earnings press release issued today. These forward-looking statements apply as of today and we undertake no obligation to revise these statements after this call. As a result, you should not rely on them as predictions for future events. Please note, unless otherwise specifically referenced, all financial measures we use on today's call except for revenue are expressed on a non-GAAP basis and have been adjusted to exclude certain charges. We have provided, to the extent available, reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures to GAAP financial measures on our IR website and in our earnings press release. Nutanix will be participating in the Bank of America Global Technology Conference on Tuesday, June 2nd in San Francisco. We hope to see you there. Finally, our fourth quarter fiscal 2026 quiet period will begin on Saturday, July 18th. And with that, I'll turn the call over to Rajiv. Rajiv,
R
Rajiv Ramaswami2:31
Thank you, Rich, and good afternoon everyone. In our third quarter, we continue to see healthy demand for our solutions as reflected in our strong bookings and outperformance versus our guided metrics. We see this demand driven by businesses looking to modernize their IT footprints, adopt hybrid cloud operating models, and deploy cloud-native applications including AI. In our third quarter, we delivered quarterly revenue of $73 million above our guidance range, grew our ARR 15% year-over-year to $2.43 billion, and saw solid free cash flow generation. We also saw another healthy quarter of new logo additions, adding over 700 new customers in Q3. Looking ahead, the environment remains dynamic. Supply chain challenges continue to drive higher prices and generally longer lead times for server hardware from our partners, which are pressuring customer budgets and timelines. However, focus on customer choice helps mitigate some of this impact and enables customers to better manage their deployment timelines and budgets. These include choice of server vendors, choice of running in the public cloud on Nutanix Cloud Clusters or NC2, and in particular choice of adopting our cloud platform with a growing number of external storage options. Note that the majority of current data center infrastructure is based on external storage and legacy hypervisors on servers. Our support of external storage platforms is simplifying migrations to Nutanix from these environments without requiring significant hardware changes. In Q3, we continue to see success in the marketplace with our cloud platform. Our most notable wins, a few of which I'll highlight, demonstrate the appeal of our solution to businesses that are looking to adopt hybrid multicloud operating models, deploy modern apps and AI, and in some cases deploy our cloud platform while retaining their existing hardware, including external storage. Two of our largest new logo wins in the quarter reflect success with our initiative to support external storage. One was a seven-figure win with a North American-based healthcare services provider who chose the Nutanix Cloud Platform to replace their incumbent infrastructure software while retaining their Everpure external storage. Another significant win was with a financial services provider who chose our cloud platform for running their Microsoft SQL databases while retaining their existing Dell PowerFlex arrays. We're pleased with the progress we've seen to date with our offering supporting external storage and expect continued growth as additional solutions become available over the course of the year. We also continue to see good uptake of our cloud-native and AI offerings in Q3. An example is one of our largest wins in the quarter with an aerospace and defense supplier in the APJ region. With this full stack expansion, the customer now plans to use Nutanix Kubernetes Platform or NKP to deploy and manage their container-based applications while continuing to run their VM-based applications on our cloud platform. They also plan to use Nutanix Database Service for database automation and Nutanix Unified Storage for managing their unstructured data. And we continue to see traction with our AI solution in Q3 with wins in areas including financial services, healthcare, and higher education. Finally, in Q3, we saw increased uptake of the public cloud deployment option for our platform NC2. This included a notable quarter-over-quarter increase in both customer wins and cores deployed. NC2 wins included a Fortune 500 financial services provider that was looking to expand its use of our cloud platform as they migrated away from their existing on-premises provider. Facing longer lead times and higher prices for servers, this customer chose to deploy NC2 on AWS. We also landed a new logo with an India-based provider of outsourcing services. This customer was looking to replace their existing data center infrastructure provider and chose to deploy our cloud platform on NC2 in OVH public cloud pending availability of server hardware. Over time, they plan to migrate their production workloads back on-prem while maintaining disaster recovery services on NC2 in OVH. They also plan on migrating their Oracle workloads to the Nutanix Cloud Platform. During the third quarter, we made a number of important product and partnership announcements, many in conjunction with our annual .NEXT customer and partner conference in Chicago, which drew over 5,000 attendees. We announced Nutanix Agentic AI in March at Nvidia's GTC 2026. This full stack software solution is designed to reduce complexity, optimize performance and security, and enable lower and more predictable token costs for agentic AI applications. Today, our Agentic AI solution works on platforms using Nvidia GPUs. With our recently announced AMD partnership, we will also be supporting AMD's GPU solutions going forward. Then in April at .NEXT, we announced new capabilities for our Agentic AI solution to support a new generation of AI cloud providers or NeoClouds. This solution is anticipated to become available in the second half of 2026. We also introduced NKP Metal, which brings the automated lifecycle management and data services of the Nutanix Cloud Platform to bare metal Kubernetes. Finally, at .NEXT we continue to demonstrate progress on our initiative to support external storage, announcing new partnerships with NetApp and Lenovo to support their storage platforms. Availability for both of these new solutions is expected within this calendar year. We also held our investor day in conjunction with .NEXT and it was a pleasure seeing many of you in person at this event. We were happy to be able to share how our platform has evolved to a unified platform for running AI and both modern and traditional applications, to provide an update on our large and growing market opportunity, and to provide an update on our medium-term target model including mid to high revenue and ARR growth in FY29. We look forward to continuing to drive towards the vision and targets we shared. In closing, we believe our business performed solidly in the third quarter, including strong bookings, healthy new logo additions, and solid free cash flow performance. Our opportunities with AI, modern applications, hybrid multicloud, and support for external storage provide us with a strong foundation for multi-year growth. And with that, I'll hand it over to Rukmini.
R
Rukmini Sivaraman11:44
Thank you, Rajiv, and thank you everyone for joining us today. It was great to see many of you at our investor day last month. I will first review our Q3 26 results followed by our guidance for Q4 26 and the updated full year 26 guidance. In Q3, we reported results that were above the high end of the range for all guided metrics. In Q3, we reported quarterly revenue of $73 million, higher than the guided range of $680 to $690 million. ARR at the end of Q3 was $2.435 billion, representing year-over-year growth of 15%. NRR or net dollar-based retention rate at the end of Q3 was 106%. In Q3, average contract duration was 3.4 years, slightly higher than our expectations. Non-GAAP gross margin in Q3 was 87.8%. Non-GAAP operating margin in Q3 was 22.3%, higher than our guided range of 16% to 17% due to lower operating expenses related to timing of hiring among other factors and higher revenue than expected. Non-GAAP net income in Q3 was $136 million or fully diluted EPS of 47 cents per share based on fully diluted weighted average shares outstanding of approximately 287 million shares. GAAP net income and fully diluted GAAP EPS in Q3 were $72 million and 25 cents per share respectively. Free cash flow in Q3 was strong at $197 million, representing a free cash flow margin of 28%, benefiting from good bookings linearity in the quarter. Moving to the balance sheet, we ended Q3 with cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments of $2.018 billion, up from $1.874 billion at the end of Q2. Moving to capital allocation. In Q3, our board increased our existing share repurchase authorization by $750 million and we repurchased $50 million worth of common stock under our authorization. We also used about $32 million of cash to retire shares related to our employees' tax liability for their quarterly RSU vesting. Together, these actions help manage share dilution. Moving to Q4 guidance. Our guidance for Q4 fiscal 26 is as follows: Revenue of $725 to $745 million. Non-GAAP operating margin of 21% to 23%. Fully diluted weighted average shares outstanding of approximately 292 million shares. Moving to the full year, our updated guidance for fiscal year 26 is as follows: Revenue of $2.82 to $2.84 billion, an increase at the midpoint from our prior guidance. Non-GAAP operating margin of approximately 22.5%, an increase from our prior guidance. Free cash flow of $760 to $780 million, representing a free cash flow margin of 27% at the midpoint, also an increase from our prior guidance. I will now provide a few points to note on our guidance. First, while we continue to operate in a dynamic environment, our TCV bookings expectations for the full year are higher relative to our last earnings call. Second, our customers continue to experience supply-related shortages and price increases for server hardware from our partners on which to run our software. This continues to impact the timing of conversion of our bookings into revenue and is factored into the updated guidance. We expect this to continue in fiscal Q4 and into fiscal year 27. Third, we continue to invest for continued growth against our large market opportunity while finding ways to do so effectively and efficiently, resulting in the increased operating margin guidance for fiscal year 26. In closing, Q3 was a strong quarter in which we beat all guided metrics and we are pleased to raise our full-year guidance. We would like to thank our employees, customers, partners, investors, and stakeholders for their continued trust in us. With that, operator, please open the line for questions.
O
Operator17:12
Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, as a reminder to ask a question, please press star one on your telephone, then wait for your name to be announced. To withdraw your question, please press star one again. Please limit yourself to one question and one follow-up. Please stand by while we compile the Q&A roster.
Our first question comes from the line of Matt Martino with Goldman Sachs. Your line is open.
M
Matt Martino17:40
Hey, good evening. Thank you for taking the questions. Rajiv, maybe to start with you. We're now several quarters into this supply chain dynamic. Are you starting to see indicators that customers are getting better equipped to manage through it? Whether it's building hardware lead times into procurement cycles or leaning more on that software-hardware decoupling option, and does that ultimately translate into smoother deal conversion for Nutanix even if the supply backdrop doesn't improve materially over the next kind of 3 to 6 months?
R
Rajiv Ramaswami18:11
Yes, Matt. For sure, customers are much more aware of the situation and are better navigating the situation, and we are also helping them with that. If you look at the last couple of months, we have seen hardware prices from server vendors out there continue to increase, but lead times are normalizing at some of the vendors but remaining extended at others. We do expect hardware prices to remain elevated going into FY27. Now, how are customers adapting? Well, they're looking for more flexibility on software licensing terms. There are some instances of customers delaying projects, but those are not very common, but that does happen once in a while. Now, to your point earlier, we have a number of tools to help them offset these issues, and they are actually also making use of this. They have choice of server vendors. We have external storage platforms now available where they can do migrations without requiring new hardware purchases. They can use our solutions in the public cloud, and we've seen some customers do that directly where servers are more easily available and sometimes cheaper than buying enterprise servers. So our customers are certainly getting used to this, and we are also providing them the options to help them adapt to this supply chain environment.
M
Matt Martino19:36
Yeah, very clear. And then for you, I know, good to see the full year guide come up a touch. I think the 4Q guide though is a touch shy of kind of what you guys were guiding towards coming out of last quarter. Can you just unpack for us what's in that number? Is it the supply visibility you have today or is there conservatism baked in, and what would you need to go right for guidance to land at the high end of that range that you put out this evening?
R
Rukmini Sivaraman20:01
Thank you, Matt, for that question. A couple of points to note. One, as you pointed out and as Rajiv just covered, is the supply chain environment continues to be dynamic, and as we've talked about in the past, some of those dynamics can impact revenue timing from quarter to quarter, so that's the first piece. The second piece I will say is that the Middle East region has been a good growth driver for us in the past and represents a mid-single-digit percent of our revenue, and we saw good performance from that region in Q3. But as we all know, given the situation there, conducting new business in the region is more challenging. And so we factored those in and are taking a prudent approach with regard to our Q4 outlook. And so to your point, Matt, in terms of what it will take for us to get to the higher end, it's really, I think, if the supply environment continues to progress as it is, then we factor that in. But if it's better or we find that customers are able to navigate it better than we have assumed, then we should be able to get to the high end of that range, or if things improve in the Middle East or some combination thereof, those should help as well.
R
Rajiv Ramaswami21:20
Yeah, I'll add a couple more things there, just clarifying also. I think it also depends on how much traction we get quickly with our external storage solution, for example, and public cloud solution. We do have new products coming to market. We've got the Pure Storage array and the SmartNIC in the market. So that could also help.
M
Matt Martino21:43
Agreed. Thank you. Thanks.
O
Operator21:45
Thank you. Our next question comes from Alana Pam Singh with Oppenheimer and Company. Your line is open.
A
Alana Pam Singh21:54
Yeah. Hi. Thank you for taking my question. So for my first one, wanted to understand how much incremental ARR is coming from selling to attach on the external storage vendors, and how are you priced compared to your closest competitor VMware, and kind of try to get a sense of what the ARR traction could look like once incremental vendors come online with PowerStore this summer and then NetApp and Scale.
R
Rajiv Ramaswami22:19
Pam, let me take that. Good question. As we said during the call earlier, the vast majority of data center infrastructure today is still external storage connected to your legacy hypervisor on servers. With the solutions that we have in the market, with the tools that we already have, we already started seeing traction. You saw, for example, we had two significant deals that we talked about on the call here, one with PowerFlex, one with Everpure, and then PowerStore coming on fairly soon here is going to also accelerate that, and then later in the year we should get NetApp. As we talked about at Investor Day, over time we intend to get to a big chunk of this addressable market, and we do expect good continued growth. Obviously, it's small. It's a small portion of our business at this point in time, but it's rapidly growing, and we expect it to be a more and more significant chunk of our business, especially since it makes it much easier to adopt our solution without having to change hardware in a supply chain-constrained environment. Was there a second part of your question that I didn't address?
A
Alana Pam Singh23:33
Oh yeah, I wanted to understand how are you priced compared to your competitor. Sorry.
R
Rajiv Ramaswami23:38
Got it. So on the pricing, our goal is to try and price the solution as close to a full stack as possible. So today, if you look at our stack, we have virtual compute, virtual networking, of course storage, and then we have the operations and management capabilities, and on top of that we have Kubernetes and AI. Let's set aside the Kubernetes and AI and look at the core platform. In the core platform, customers have an option. They can either use our own storage or they can use external storage. And we try and price this as close to the full stack solution as possible. The idea being we want to make it attractive for customers to go deploy this, especially when they have hardware that's not fully depreciated that they want to reuse. We want to make it easy for them. And at the same time, we're always looking to over time bring them on as an HCI customer because we do believe that is the single best way for running these cloud environments from a TCO perspective, from an operational simplicity perspective, etc. So our pricing strategy is to try and capture as much of the value as we can that we would capture normally with the full stack but with customers using external storage.
A
Alana Pam Singh24:44
Got it. Thank you so much. As my follow-up really quickly, on the AI product that you introduced and you talked about, any early feedback from customers there? Enterprise AI adoption is still in early stages and kind of in flux, but want to understand how the customers feel about your product portfolio and stance today, and would you price that as an add-on or kind of like part of your full stack? Thank you.
R
Rajiv Ramaswami25:08
It is, first of all, we do capture incremental value for that. The Nutanix AI is an additional SKU that is on top of the rest of the full stack solution. So we are able to capture some extra value. Now if you look at it, there's two parts to the solution. There is the solution that we can sell directly to enterprises that build their own GPU clusters and build, run, and operate it. The second part of our solution that we announced at our .NEXT conference was targeted towards NeoClouds and service providers. I would say we are in the early stages on both. We continue to see wins every quarter here, and we have seen wins this quarter as well across the verticals that we talked about: financial services, for example, healthcare, education. Some of the more regulated verticals tend to focus on having clusters on-prem, but it's still early days. The field is evolving very rapidly. We will continue to make advances very rapidly, but we do think this is a significant long-term opportunity for us and a tailwind to our overall business over all.
A
Alana Pam Singh26:10
All right. Thank you so much for those answers. Really appreciate it.
O
Operator26:15
Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Jim Fish with Piper Sandler. Your line is open.
J
Jim Fish26:22
Hi guys. Thanks for the question here. Maybe circling back on the first one and kind of trying to get more certainty here in light of the comments that you made also. Rajiv, you talked about an increase in public cloud deployment. First, any sense to the size of NC2 at this point or public cloud within the portfolio today? And secondly, how much that increased server cost is actually causing the shift towards cloud, essentially at least temporarily, that it seems like you're seeing a pickup in NC2 because of rising server costs. Is that the message you're trying to convey here? That hey, look, use us, we can help you go between it, and as a result your NC2 offering is seeing incremental growth.
R
Rajiv Ramaswami27:11
Yes. For sure, Jim, on the second part of the question, there's no doubt that server constraints, enterprise server constraints, are causing customers to look more at the public cloud with NC2. We have a couple of examples that I can talk about here just to give you some color on this. We were at a financial services company, we had a win just last quarter where their plan was originally to do an on-prem to on-prem migration from their legacy vendor onto Nutanix, and what they discovered as they went along, given the server pricing, was that they could get actually servers on AWS and use our software on it, and that those are more easily available and faster to get going, and so they're doing that. They're probably going to do some mix of on-prem migration but also use a portion of this to migrate to Nutanix on AWS. In other cases, we've seen customers saying, well, it's going to take me some time to get servers. Let me start with NC2 on the public cloud and then I can bring that back on-prem as and when my servers get ready. So we have certainly seen this to be a contributing factor in terms of acceleration of our NC2 bookings. To your first question, what we said was we are seeing an uptick. We are seeing more customers and we're also seeing more consumption of NC2. We haven't really given you any more specifics at this point yet. And it is still, I would say, a minority portion of our business for sure, but it's a growing portion of our business.
J
Jim Fish28:42
Then Rukmini, on the metric side of things, decent spike up of duration here which is a little bit atypical of this quarter to begin with. And you guys didn't really call out any major massive kind of wins that would have influenced that. So can you just talk about what drove that?
Can you walk us through what's causing that little bit of a pickup here and if that's kind of the rate we should be thinking about heading into Q4 and if we're going to see a bottom in net retention rate now here at 106 or if this is again kind of the rate to think about. Thanks guys.
R
Rajiv Ramaswami29:17
Thank you Jim. So the first question I think was on duration. So correct, as I said in my prepared remarks, we did see average contract duration come in a little bit higher than we had expected for the quarter. No specific deal to call out, Jim. It can vary from quarter to quarter based on the deal mix. So what we saw in Q3 was generally just a higher mix of larger and longer duration transactions across both land and expand and renewals. And of course, as we know, duration can also help on the revenue performance. So that's on duration. Nothing specific to note and I wouldn't necessarily assume that that continues. We just saw a mix in Q3 that contributed to that. And then to your question on NRR, I would say it's important to note that the factors that we've outlined over the last couple of quarters as to the delaying recognition of revenue relative to bookings also impacts ARR and NRR. Right? So that's what we're continuing to see here. And then the other piece that I've noted before is that the average ACB or ASPs of our new logo transactions have been steadily increasing over the past few years and we give a bit of quantification of that in our investor today and so that does create a bit of a headwind on expansion growth rate which is reflected in NRR. Now all that said, we are continued to focus on driving adoption and expansion of our solutions within the customer base and that continues to remain a focus going forward.
O
Operator30:57
Thank you. Our next question comes from Alan of WMC Moham with Bank of America. The line is open.
A
Alana Pam Singh31:06
Yes, thank you so much. You said full year TCB bookings are higher than at last earnings call but customers are still facing these server related issues. So any quantification on how much revenue and maybe free cash flow is being deferred because of these constraints maybe best guess or qualitatively any color that you can share there.
R
Rajiv Ramaswami31:31
Yeah I can take that. Thanks for the question. Look, I would say I think the reason we sort of gave you the color on bookings, which historically we haven't done as you know, but we've been doing it over the last few quarters because we think it's important for you to know what's happening in terms of bookings and of course some of you I know calculated based on RPO as well. So that was strong in Q3. Now we haven't quantified specifically how much revenue is being deferred because of this, but what I will say is that look, I think we have seen, we've made abundantly clear on this call that some of the challenges around supply chain are continuing. We had made a comment last quarter you might remember where we felt that we would have been able to raise all the numbers for our full year if not fully supply chain challenges and of course this quarter we're happy to be able to raise our full year number coming off of our Q3 and going into Q4. So I will say it continues to be a factor here clearly in terms of our revenue impact but we haven't really quantified it in terms of specifics.
A
Alana Pam Singh32:37
Yeah. Thanks. And then maybe just to follow up, you mentioned something in your prepared remarks around the margins, right? Just basically better topline and timing of hires. You have been obviously outperforming on this metric like how much of this upside would you say is just timing of spend maybe whether it's hiring or maybe other things around revenue mix or delayed investments I mean how should we think about sustainability here given what we know from internally what you know from your plans here.
R
Rajiv Ramaswami33:18
Yeah, so on operating margin I'd say look, we were happy to take our full year guide up relative to what we said 3 months ago and the point I was making is that look, we've obviously taken our revenue guidance up for the full year as well and we do believe that there's a large market opportunity that we have to go and tackle and we do believe in continuing to invest for that, but at the same time doing so in a way that is efficient. So there are a couple of things I would say that's sort of the headline message. Now in addition, like I said in my remarks, we have some fluctuations quarter to quarter in terms of timing of hiring which we do expect to get caught up here over the next coming period of time and then I think we'll continue to be thoughtful about how we invest going forward. We gave you our intent to continue to grow operating margins over time and that continues to be our intent in terms of going into next year and beyond.
A
Alana Pam Singh34:16
Okay. Thanks so much.
R
Rajiv Ramaswami34:18
Thank you.
O
Operator34:20
Our next question comes from Milan of Sam Chattery with JP Morgans. The line is open.
M
Milan34:27
Hi, thank you for taking my question. This is MP on formic strategy. For my first question just wanted to ask how did the sales via OEM partners track relative to your own expectations heading into the quarter and any color on expectations for that to track through the rest of the calendar year. Thank you. And I have a followup.
R
Rajiv Ramaswami34:48
I will, so this is you're talking about sell through our OEM partners, right? And if you look at those, we have Cisco, we have Dell and we have Lenovo largely. Those are the OEM partners that we have. We do a small amount to HP as well. And I would say they largely tracked as we expected. We've had Cisco continuing to grow and Lenovo has been a good steady state partner for us for several years now. I would say with Dell, the business is growing but it's growing from a small base and we do expect that to potentially grow more once we have the PowerStore solution in the market because they are much more aligned towards external storage than they are to serving HCI which is what we have today in the market with them.
M
Milan35:39
Thank you Rajiv. And for my followup, I just wanted to ask on the new logo addition. Can you please discuss your performance relative to different cohorts of customers? Maybe large enterprises versus small and medium enterprises. Do you see any meaningful difference across those cohorts? Thank you.
R
Rajiv Ramaswami35:56
Those new logos, I mean we got 700 this quarter. They're well distributed across that entire spectrum. You know we have a three-tier segmented model to go after our customer base. We have the top tier which is large enterprise and then we have the middle tier which is the smaller side of enterprise and commercial and then the tier below that and more channel-led in that scenario. Now if you look at just the volume, typically of course there are more customers available in the lower tiers than the upper tiers but from a distribution perspective, we are seeing wins across all of them, everything from the global 2000 the largest customers all the way down to the smaller customers. So it's a well distributed set of new logos.
M
Milan36:41
Thank you.
O
Operator36:43
Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Matt Hbert with RBC BC capital markets. Your line is open.
S
Simon36:51
Hey guys, this is Simon from Matt Hedber. Congrats on the quarter and thanks for taking our question. Just one from me. Can you help us think through your available to renew pool into fourth quarter and any early thoughts you have around fiscal year 27?
R
Rukmini Sivaraman37:11
Sure, I can take that. Hi Simon. So for Q4, look, I think nothing to call out and we've said that we have quarter-to-quarter movement in terms of when those renewals get transacted often just due to the normal course of business and when customers choose to transact similar. So nothing unusual to call out on that front from a Q4 perspective. And then in terms of fiscal year 27, again as I think as you all know, we really typically guide to fiscal year 27 in our August earnings call after we report Q4. So I will just leave it at that for now and say that that ATR is expected to grow in fiscal year 27 as one would expect and leave it there. Simon, thanks for your question.
O
Operator37:58
Okay thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Tim Long with Sparkle. Your line is open.
T
Tim Long38:08
Thank you. Yeah, two questions if I could as well. First I want to go back to this competition not just on pricing but when you think about competitive landscape VMware and the others. You obviously got a lot going on here with bringing on storage vendors and options around servers and bringing in cloud-based and other more flexible solutions. How do you think the competitive landscape is stacking up against all the options that you guys are providing to keep growth going here? Number one. And then number two, on the AI offerings, I understand some of them are pretty new, but can you just give us a sense of how they're scaling and how we should think about the TAM or growth or size that those businesses could be ultimately? Any color you can give us around that would be helpful. Thank you.
R
Rajiv Ramaswami39:08
Yeah. So on the first one, the competitive dynamics, Tim. So if you look at the competitors there and some of them are partners too. So the competition typically would be I would call out of course VMware and Broadcom I would say now. They are and that's where most of our customers are coming from and or migrating away from. And if you look at what Gartner talks about, the vast majority of customers are looking to exit over time. So that's more of a come from situation and then where do they go? They go to one of two or three places. They go to Nutanix, they go to Red Hat, they go to Microsoft, a small number, and then some of them go to the public cloud directly. So that's the competitive landscape. It hasn't really changed much in the last several quarters. It's kind of been there. So Red Hat is competing there with the Kubernetes based virtualization solution and we tend to do very well when it comes to mission critical VMware workloads running in production because we have a very solid performant platform for doing that. With the public cloud, sometimes customers do make strategic decisions to go to the public cloud but what they find is it's much easier for them to go to the public cloud on the Nutanix platform itself and we've seen that part of our business continuing to grow very nicely. We have some good examples that we showcased at our conference as well, you know, Stage Seat for example with a large bank that's operating at pretty high volumes across Azure, AWS, and on-prem all using the Nutanix solution. So that's the competitive landscape. We feel quite comfortable that the easiest option for the Broadcom customers to migrate to is Nutanix. It's much simpler, doesn't require any work on the applications itself, and can be largely automated as well. And with our expansion into external storage, we provide even more options and easier options for those customers to migrate. To your second part about AI adoption, I think I covered that a bit earlier. It's you know we've had the latest versions of our AI solutions are fairly new. The agentic AI stack that we announced in February and an enhancement to take that into the service provider base in April. And we're starting to see good traction but it's still early days. I would say most of our customers are still in their early days of experimentation. They're still trying to get GPU clusters on prem. The supply is always an issue there as well. But we are encouraged because we see this as a huge market opportunity. We talked about this at our last investor day recently here about being a multi-billion dollar TAM over time but it's still pretty early days but we're starting to see good encouraging signs among several industry verticals.
T
Tim Long41:57
Okay. Thank you very much.
R
Rajiv Ramaswami42:00
Thank you. Thank you.
O
Operator42:00
Our next question comes from the line of Sandit Singh with Morgan Stanley. Your line is open.
A
Abby Shakeley42:09
Hi, this is Abby Shakeley on for Sant Singh. Thanks for taking the question. I was wondering if we could get an update on the AMD partnership. Understood that revenue contribution is supposed to happen in fiscal to go into effect by the end of the year and how does the pipeline shaping up? Thanks for the question.
R
Rajiv Ramaswami42:28
Yeah, there again it's very early days in terms of actually having a solution in the market. We don't quite have that yet. I mean of course to be clear, we're already selling, our platform already supports their CPUs and we will support more and more of their CPUs and that's here and now and that even predates this latest partnership. On the GPU side, again we don't quite have that solution in the market but what I would say is customers are looking for options. In fact, if you look at the market for AI chips, there's Nvidia of course, and then there's AMD, and then there's the public cloud providers building their own chips, and then there's a whole slew of chips targeting inference coming out into the market. So our customers generally want more and more choice. They want to be able to run their AI applications, especially their inferencing and agentic applications with the lowest cost, the most efficient way possible and minimize the cost per token. So having AMD as an option here for us as we go into the market, I think second half of FY27 is where we're going to see the first traction with that solution, which is going to help from a customer perspective.
A
Abby Shakeley43:43
Thank you.
O
Operator43:46
Our next question comes from the line of Mike Fos with Nem. Your line is open.
M
Mike Fos43:52
Oh terrific. Thank you. And congrats on the consistent execution and the volatile backdrop here. This is now the second consecutive quarter where management has discussed higher bookings expectations versus the prior earnings call which is great color particularly in light of the delayed conversion timeline and revenue. Two questions if I could but first the company doesn't guide to or communicate its bookings at least externally. Is there any way you can help qualify or quantify to what degree your bookings outlook has improved over the last 90 to 180 days? And then the followup there is did the volume of deals with delayed conversions become more material in Q3 versus what was observed in Q2? Just any color on those two dynamics would be really appreciated and again congrats on the consistent execution here.
R
Rukmini Sivaraman44:52
Hi Mike, thank you for those questions. You know, first to your question on bookings, you're right that it's not a metric we report or intend to report. The reason we've been providing some incremental color here over the last couple of quarters is exactly the reason that you pointed out, which is that we are having revenue timing shift out. And so we thought it would be important to provide that color of the underlying demand and the underlying performance if you will from a bookings perspective that will translate into revenue over time. And so one point I will say is if you look at Q3, Mike, we saw that bookings was strong at over 20% on a TTD basis. And so I wanted to call that out. But I know some of you again calculate try to calculate bookings based on RPO. So you'll see that there as well. So that was Q3. We haven't really quantified on a full year basis, Mike, how much it was relative to kind of 3 months ago or anything like that, but I will give you that number which was really strong for Q3 from an overall booking growth perspective. And then I think your second question was on thinking about the volume of deals that are coming in with sort of this revenue in the future in Q3 relative to Q4. And look, again I'm not sort of breaking out the specifics of that Mike because it can move around from quarter to quarter because again it just depends on what these customers are saying which platform they're going to go with. I think Rajiv mentioned earlier that with some of the server providers we're actually seeing lead times normalize although prices remain elevated and in others the lead times remain really elongated. So it does vary based on what the customers are choosing to deploy and so I'll say again we're not giving quarter to quarter how much revenue is moving around but in the aggregate of course we were pleased to be able to raise our full year revenue guide on the back of Q3.
M
Mike Fos46:54
Thank you.
R
Rukmini Sivaraman46:55
Thank you Mike.
O
Operator46:59
Our next question comes from Milan of Rad Radi Sultan with UBS. Milan is open.
M
Milan47:06
Awesome. Yeah, thanks for taking the questions. Maybe just first for Rajiv just with the VCF9 deadline end of next year. Any sort of trends in customer behavior as we approach that VMware deadline and then what are you doing to sort of attack and accelerate some of those migrations ahead of that deadline end of next year?
R
Rajiv Ramaswami47:25
Yeah, first of all, it is a point in time, right? And we've always said that this migration happens over time in multiple ways. This is just one more point where customers have to make choices. Now, the color I'll give you on this is that most customers who have purchased VCF today have not fully adopted VCF, right? They're buying VCF, but they're deploying what they were deploying before, which is vSphere with external storage. And now the same thing will happen with VCF9. It's going to force these customers to go buy VCF9, but it's not clear to me that they're going to all deploy it fully, right? It's going to take time and they may still deploy portions of it. Now if they want to deploy all of it, by the way, it's going to require a substantial hardware refresh including their embedded storage solutions. Now at that point they have even more of a choice to choose to migrate to a modern platform like Nutanix or keep going with them. So we are certainly giving these customers a lot of options now, more options on the table saying preserve your hardware for example, come to us with the existing solution you've got with external storage if you'd like. We can do a full HCI conversion. VCF9 is going to be quite a significant upgrade for you all in terms of the effort that you're going to have to put in, you may still not benefit from all of these capabilities, it is complex. And then of course we have these options of external storage, public cloud, and we have also the automated migration tools behind that and of course the commercial incentives. All of those put together to provide a good proposition for customers to migrate and like I said, we're seeing this with customers coming and migrating every quarter as we saw in our new logos.
M
Milan49:14
Got it. Got it. That's super helpful. Just one followup for Rukmini just as we think about that TCV bookings coming in higher relative to expectations for the full year. I just wanted to clarify was that simply Q3 TCV bookings outperformed and now your expectations for the full year are higher or that's also inclusive of sort of Q4 TCV bookings you kind of expect to be higher than last quarter and maybe if that is the case you maybe just unpack like what actually is driving that outperformance. Thank you.
R
Rukmini Sivaraman49:43
Yeah, thanks for the questions. So I would say look, I think overall for the year was a comment we made that for the full year we're expecting the TCV bookings growth to be higher than we'd expected 3 months ago. And in terms of what's driving that, I think a couple of things: one is the point that someone asked earlier on longer contract durations which helps with TCV of course, and then we've also seen better renewals performance. So those are the two main things driving the TCV bookings growth higher. And of course, we're continuing to make sure that we're watching and navigating all of the factors around the timing of bookings to revenue, but pleased with the overall bookings performance to date and we gave you color on expectations for the full year.
M
Milan50:32
Thank you so much.
R
Rukmini Sivaraman50:34
Thank you.
O
Operator50:36
Our next question comes from the line of Simon Leopold with Fayman James. Your line is open.
V
Victor50:43
Hi, this is Victor on for Simon. So I think you kind of answered that in your last remark, but just to clarify that this higher full year revenue revision is a reflection of your expectations around better bookings traction and the higher TCV. Is that correct?
R
Rukmini Sivaraman51:12
Yes, I'm not sure what the question is. Victor, I think what we are trying, what we said in our prepared remarks is that our booking expectations for the full year on a TCV basis is higher than we had expected 3 months ago. And then I also pointed out that if you look at Q3 and I know some folks calculate Q3 booking on RPO, but overall bookings growth in Q3 was also strong at over 20% year-over-year and that and slightly higher revenue recognition and that's what's driving your higher guidance outlook slightly.
V
Victor51:49
Yeah. What changed between last quarter and this quarter that's giving you confidence in your ability to do that? Is it just better traction that you're seeing?
R
Rukmini Sivaraman52:01
The ability to raise the full year revenue guidance? Is that the question?
V
Victor52:05
Yeah.
R
Rukmini Sivaraman52:06
Yeah. So I mean we obviously beat Q3 which we were really happy to see that Q3 was a really strong quarter. So happy to beat Q3 and then take up the guidance for the full year as well.
V
Victor52:18
Okay. And just really quickly how much of the new logo wins are coming from your competitors versus new HCI customers? I think it's predominantly from customers transitioning. Is that correct? And most of them are coming from VM customers. Sorry, VM customers.
R
Rajiv Ramaswami52:41
Yeah. Thank you.
O
Operator52:46
Our next question comes from the line of Ben Bolan with Cleveland Research Company. Your line is open.
B
Ben Bolan52:53
Good evening everyone. Thank you for taking the question. Rajiv, I think you've introduced some programs to decouple software from hardware and kind of make customers' lives easier. Could you talk about some of the things that you're doing and how you think that's impacting the overall visibility? And then I have a followup.
R
Rajiv Ramaswami53:14
Yeah, by the way, we've had this with most of our OEM partners for quite a while, right? I mean if you look at the selling motion today or even in the past, we sell software to customers and they choose the hardware whether it's Dell or HP or Lenovo. The exception was Supermicro right where typically with Supermicro in the past the solution was more Nutanix software and Supermicro hardware together but of course we don't see the Supermicro solution on our books at all but it goes directly to Supermicro but typically they tend to purchase those together. Now given the supply situation that we have right now, we wanted to decouple this and say customer, you make your software choice and then if you'd like to go buy Supermicro hardware please feel free to do so. So you also have your choices about the customers. So that's the only change that we've made recently in terms of the supply situation, just to provide customers again very clearly that choices of where we tend to go. Now in the past this was more not an issue, but with the supply being what it is now we have to provide even more flexibility and choice and that's what we did. And so that is now how we typically sell today and basically what we're doing is customers usually are looking at buying a software and you choose which hardware you want to put it on.
B
Ben Bolan54:42
Okay. The one other question is I know you're not quantifying the amount of time or the duration from when you're collecting the cash to when the software rev bracket is commencing today but could you talk a little bit about where you think average lead times are on the appliance business or from appliance vendors today where that stands with customers and how that has changed over the past few quarters.
R
Rajiv Ramaswami55:12
I mean I'll just give you a broad range because it depends on the configuration, it depends on the vendor. Anything from a few weeks, when I say 3 to 4 weeks, to 6 months. That is the range that we see and it varies by the week, by the month, by the configuration, by the vendor.
B
Ben Bolan55:38
Thanks.
O
Operator55:42
Ladies and gentlemen, I'm showing no further questions in the queue. That concludes today's conference call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.