Back
Sarathy Naicker
CTO / Co-founder, Klue

Jason Smith & Sarathy Naicker - AI Powered Competitor Insight | Klue | Afternoon "T" Podcast - # 48

🎥 Jun 27, 2022 📺 TTT Studios ⏱ 51m
AfternoonT is a weekly podcast hosted by TTT Studios Co-Founder & President Chris Hobbs to share success stories of Canadian ...
Watch on YouTube
Transcript (51 segments)
S
Sarathy Naicker0:00
I can't think of any one day where we didn't support each other in some small way. If somebody is falling down, then they put them on their back, and when they fall down, that person puts them on their back. That is the culture that I'm talking about.
H
Host0:18
Bonjour, bonjour, bonjour! I'm super duper excited today because I have two amazing founders who have an amazing story of an event that just took place. But before we get into the questions, let me set this up. Today is a special episode of Afternoon Tea as I have Sarathy Naicker and Jason Smith, co-founders of Klue, an AI-powered competitive enablement platform. Sarathy is an experienced software professional with a deep background in data processing, security, and design. Prior to founding Klue, he played an important role with ActiveState and Sophos. Jason Smith is the co-founder, investor, or early employee of five startups, including former president of Vision Critical, VP of Electronic Arts, and co-founder of The Columbus Group. Gentlemen, thank you so much for joining me today.
S
Sarathy Naicker1:32
Happy to be here, Chris.
H
Host1:33
Fantastic. Well, let's talk about the big news. Do one of you want to tell me what just happened in the big step of Klue's success?
S
Sarathy Naicker1:43
I'll let Jason go because he was the one instrumental in making that happen.
J
Jason Smith1:49
Yeah, we're happy to announce that we raised a $62 million US dollar Series B with Tiger Global leading it and Salesforce Ventures participating. It's an exciting time to fuel up the rocket and see if we can take this further.
H
Host2:05
I love that. Most people think once they raise $2 million they're set. You guys raised $62 million. What do you do to celebrate? How did you celebrate and what's the next step?
S
Sarathy Naicker2:36
Celebrations are hard for me because I'm never satisfied. I'm a nitpicker. Jason is that way too on different things. We complement each other. But we realized we need to celebrate the wins. Our way of celebrating is by calling out the people who made it happen. Jason and I, with our spouses, went for a nice dinner. Our spouses have been the biggest influence and they rarely get called out.
H
Host4:07
That's fascinating. It's important to celebrate. Three cheers to the spouses. I noticed the party everyone else was having. Congratulations. Where did it start? How did you guys meet? Jason, why don't you explain?
J
Jason Smith5:17
I'll give that background. The employee celebration was compelling; we saw a lot of pride on LinkedIn. As for how Sarathy and I met, it was through a mutual connection. I was looking for a technical co-founder. Sarathy was in India caring for his parents, and I was about to fly there. We had many mutual connections. Sarathy was a Perl maintainer, and I admired his work. I convinced him not to take a job at Amazon and to start a company with me. I'm the hustler, he's the hacker, and that makes a great founder couple.
H
Host9:59
I love that you focused on complementary skills. That's a fantastic origin story.
S
Sarathy Naicker10:24
You haven't mentioned, Jason mentioned us aligning on culture first. We wanted to create a place we would enjoy working every day. We've kept that focus.
H
Host11:07
That's fantastic. Here's a question: what's the balance of defining culture? How much is executive and how much is team?
S
Sarathy Naicker11:44
It's organic. We decided early on that our Google Drive would be open by default for transparency. We share board meeting notes freely. We also have a Friday meeting called 'Show, Don't Tell' where people show what they did. That has been a defining feature of our culture.
H
Host14:14
Those are simple expressions of culture. I'm interested in your personal journey. Why did you come to Canada and what were your expectations?
S
Sarathy Naicker15:14
I had no preconceptions. I got a fellowship to do a PhD in architecture at Michigan but left to get a master's in CS. I got involved in Perl and was recruited by ActiveState in Vancouver. I visited in 1998, loved the mild weather and multiculturalism, and moved here. I've stayed ever since.
H
Host19:56
How long were you with ActiveState?
S
Sarathy Naicker20:01
Five years, then Sophos acquired them and I stayed for another 10 years.
H
Host20:14
What did you do as Chief Technologist at Sophos?
S
Sarathy Naicker20:19
We built an anti-spam tool using Perl and Sendmail, which became PureMessage. Sophos acquired us for that. I continued working on perimeter protection software and hardware, including UTMs.
H
Host22:45
I remember the old Sendmail stuff. What made Perl interesting for you?
S
Sarathy Naicker23:25
I needed a language to embed in a traffic simulator for my graduate work. Perl was easy to embed. I started fixing bugs and got involved in the community. I became the hacker at large of the Programming Republic of Perl. The community had compelling cultural stories.
H
Host26:06
Republic... that's going to bring her all back. He did tell me that he quoted in Pearl in the early days, so very nice. He's going to tell you that story probably. Do you remember the first script you did? The first thing you wrote?
S
Sarathy Naicker26:33
Don't, don't say I'm just 'Hello World.' I'm just waking up right now. It was... Car is sorry, finish speaking. I can't. I'm like... Yeah, it's uh, no, I like it, you know. Sorry, that I have a wonderful relationship when it comes to that. There's um, I uh, I am not a coder. No, the best I did was create a clown in Visual Basic back in um, on an Apple IIe, and had it printed on a dot matrix computer, and I think I won the 'Least Likely to Be a Programmer for a Living' award at Lakefield Computer Camp. That was my claim to fame on that.
But it is actually funny enough, as I try and get my two daughters into coding, probably my biggest regret is not going down that path. I did solder at UBC and graduated with a marketing degree, and embarrassed my family by starting a company right out of university.
H
Host27:25
Well, well, that's what I was going to ask you about. So that's the Columbus Group? The Columbus Group Communication Inc.?
S
Sarathy Naicker27:31
Yeah, yeah. Tell me a little bit about that. So this is going way back, like Netscape era, early days of the web. Two friends and I started a company effectively building websites, and we just tried to do it in a kind of programmatic way, more of a custom way, like a web planning process that would lead to an outcome. Back in the day, it was like you want Package A, B, or C from your internet service provider, and so it was a slight differentiator that we brought in. We ended up building that company from the three of us, university, we can't get our jobs so we'll start our own company mindset. Awesome. Five grand in a pot, and that ended up being a 100-person company that got acquired by Telus, just before the first dot-com era came to an end.
And so it was a good outcome. When you do that straight out of university, you've got this mindset that building a business is easy somehow, right? Because you get lucky and you think it's you, and then you realize that there's a lot of factors that come into play. I think the best entrepreneurs out there would admit there's a lot of grit and persistence and grind that you have to do, because you need a big healthy dose of market luck that's going to help you tailwind.
H
Host28:52
I hear you, I hear you. Well, question: I mean, you want to start what? Because it's such a stitched line in time where people like my eight-year age, we started with doing websites. We got out of university, weren't sure what to do, we started by websites, it got us in the industry. What year were you in solder?
S
Sarathy Naicker29:09
So I came out of solder in '94.
H
Host29:12
Okay, so we're pretty much the same then. Well, I was '97, '98. But uh, UBC Ski Club, I always bring it up. You had maybe did it ago? I used to be the president of that group. If you're '98, Chris, that's why you look younger and healthier than I do. So that's the difference. I extended it a lot, let's just say that. Undergrad was basically a PhD.
Well, let's go to the next chapter then. Because I mean, congratulations for even your first exit, 100 people. That's incredible. It really speaks to leadership, vision, and a whole lot of luck. It's a common theme which I'll have to agree with. But then he went down to SFO, right in San Francisco, with Buyzoo.com. Was that the next chapter? Can you tell me what that was like and how different it is to be doing it in the Valley instead of in Canada?
S
Sarathy Naicker30:05
Yeah, it was very different. That was a startup with two HBS grads, so they had the whole Harvard mafia to leverage to get into the right types of CEO offices and venture capitalists. Where the first company was services, five grand in a pot, buy some Macs and go hang a shingle and hustle, this one was think of it like Groupon before the social graph. Timing-wise, too early. Learned a big lesson around looking for trends and dovetailing those trends to not be too far ahead or too far behind. But that one was interesting because SF was going off, everyone was at dot-com everything, and just at the tail end of that we were trying to raise basically 20 million dollars on the back of a PowerPoint deck. It seemed like that's what you're supposed to do. Odd for me as the bootstrapped, grindy entrepreneur to be exposed to that world. But hey, I didn't go to Harvard, so let's follow these guys and they seem to know better. It was interesting to see the difference in approach from how an MBA thinker would go about building a business. Unbelievably smart people, but the difference between 'is there a loose brick in that wall' entrepreneur and 'I'm going to analyze everything and come to a probabilistic outcome and make a decision on that' versus ignoring the odds was quite clear to me.
In fact, in my next thing, I worked at Electronic Arts for a guy named Don Mattrick. We'd won some Entrepreneur of the Year awards through our first business, and he kind of we won the kid category, the emerging one, and he went for the real technology one. I remember going up to him and saying, 'Look, I graduated, we started this company, and I really don't know what I'm doing. I could use a mentor.' Kind of developed a relationship. So when Columbus sold, I was going to go work for him, and then did the Spicy thing with the HBS grads. I remember talking to him about doing it instead of EA, and he's like, 'Oh, I'm so disappointed in you.' I'm like, 'What do you mean?' 'I'm so disappointed that you would go not start up a company, but that you would do it with a couple MBAs.' And I'm like, 'What are you talking about?' He literally said, 'Look, the difference of a successful entrepreneur early: you have a mindset of you've done it, you pattern match, you think you can do it again naively, and it's a big thruster engine that you need to get your business off the ground to mentally think you can just do it and find a way. Whereas the MBA world teaches you how to analyze and be a little more cautious, probabilistic outcomes.' So that disappointment ended up revealing itself. It was more the timing of that business idea, and he ended up bringing me in to look at mobile gaming at EA. It was a completely different world for me, going from 'Is that a door? Can I use that door and put IKEA legs on it, flip it over, and is there a box we can sit on?' to three air chairs and a couch in my office, IT people that would set everything up for me, thousands of people, a VP title that seemed to matter, working for the president of Worldwide Studios. It was just completely different, a real income too, a paycheck, whereas we paid ourselves nothing in our first company. Very different worlds. I realized I was a fish out of water there and didn't want to stay too long. Also, it was very unique how people thought about it. There was a lot of career concern for individuals versus let's put the company first. There was no 'let's do this all together.' It was, 'I'll say that, but really, you're not going to screw me, are you? Because I need to climb this ladder.' I thought, 'It's not for me.' That's just a general shot at when you get bigger, there's politics, right? Yeah, not for me.
It's a left. I was big into the ultimate frisbee world and got into a company that a friend of mine from solder started called Gaia. I was an early snowboarder, so I had this conviction that if you could be the brand that's emblematic of the sport, then you can rise as the sport rises. I was convinced that everybody in the world was going to play ultimate, ultimate was going to take over the world. So we built a company effectively like an Umbro soccer cleats, bags, and custom jerseys. It got to a couple million bucks, but it was never going to take off. Real inventory, for those of us in tech listening, we're lucky. Hard to see when you get real inventory: men's and women's cuts, 15 different colors, plus extra small all the way to XL. How many do you order of each? Where do you store it in the US and Canada? The logistics associated with that, getting product delivered on time, quality suppliers, just a different world. So I bailed out of that and then started to work at... Actually, truthfully, I looked around and said, 'I don't want to start another company. I want to go work for somebody who's been there, done that.' That's when I found Vision Critical and Angus Reed and his son Andrew, kind of getting that thing off the ground. There's Betty folks. I know Andrew's been on your show, good friend.
H
Host35:24
Great, great show with Andrew. I got to say, he really, I learned a lot from him. He was fantastic.
S
Sarathy Naicker35:30
He's unbelievable, he's a force of nature. He was impressive from day one when I met him. His father obviously had a great reputation, sold his company for a hundred million dollars, so I thought let's get on board there. It was like eight people at the time, and let's see if I could help that. Joining it, I really thought of it as my own company as an entrepreneur very much would. That's a beneficial thing, and it's also maybe a negative because you expect certain things, not financially, but just control over your vision, and it's not your company. But it was a good gig there that grew over seven years to 500 people. Vision Critical is now called a leader, and it was certainly a good Canadian success story. But when I look at it relative to what maybe we could have become, when our biggest competitor is now public for 25 billion dollars, Qualtrics, and we were equal to them at a certain point in time, it's frustrating to think that we look at a couple hundred million dollar valuation as a success, which it would be, and yet there's a 25 billion dollar outcome that was in your grasp. That context certainly helped sharpen my focus into Klue and say, if there is a big opportunity, that's where you want to try and scale up and win it and be the category leader, instead of in our case being very conservative on our financial raises. In Vision Critical, this time actually maybe raise the capital to really accelerate yourself ahead of the competition and be that category leader.
H
Host37:14
Well, can I ask a question about that? Because Vision Critical is one of those companies that really intrigues me. In the States you have the PayPal mafia, but there's so many great companies that come out of the people from Vision Critical, like Chris from Dooley and all this. What is it that, what's the DNA that makes people, why do so many innovators come out of Vision Critical, which at the end of the day wasn't the technology, it was relatively straightforward? Why do so many great innovators come out of there, do you think?
S
Sarathy Naicker37:43
So it's a great question. I think there's Mark Bergen now runs all global revenue for Shopify, and he and Chris were both on the sales team at Vision Critical. I think there's a magic moment in any company's history where you have the wind at your back, the sails are full, and you're cranking, and the culture feels right, the market feels like it's yours for the taking. There's still lots of grinding, but there's this magic feeling of possibility. I think everybody was infected by that in the early days of Vision Critical, and that sense of what we can do. I think we found that balance of American-Canadian, just enough ego to sit at a table and be confident with other highly confident people, but at the same time have the humility of a Canadian that says we still don't know and there's lots we should learn and listen for. That's part of what we tried to build at Vision Critical culturally. Again, there's a lot of people there that we had the right motions in place. We certainly had Chris and Mark and I and Andrew were all more on the SaaS product side and go-to-market side of that business. Actually, Chris Whitmore and Tamara X from Vision Critical both work at Klue now. Chris was the CTO and he's now our VP of Engineering, Tamara was running product and now she runs product at Klue. I think a lot of people had a taste of what could be and what was a great success, but it feels like we could maybe tweak that model a little more and get to the next one. So I think it's really just what everybody tries to do: attract good people, give them room to move, build a culture that elevates them, and see how far you can take it.
H
Host39:39
That's a great answer. I really, really, really like that. Well, gem. I mean, and then you guys met, you created an amazing company, you've sold it for 200 billion dollars? Maybe I jumped ahead, but I'm creating a story line for where you're going: iconic public company that can last forever. There you go. And then you take all the rest of Vancouver along with you, and I'm looking forward to riding that tail of that dragon.
Well, again, the theme of afternoon tea is to talk about the amazing journey that both of you had in order to expedite the next generation of Canadian founders. So I have two questions I always ask. And Sarathy, I'm going to start with you, if you please. Can you share one piece of advice to help younger Canadian founders, one thing that you've learned along the journey?
S
Sarathy Naicker40:36
I think the primary factor for success is probably finding a great partner. To me, what has led to this is my wife, a great life partner, and my friend Jason was a great business partner. In so many ways, we support each other. We complement each other and yet we're similar in other respects. That mix of complementary skills and attitudes always helps, because business life has its ebbs and flows. Some days you're bullish, some days you're down and not bullish, and you need the other person to lift you up. Throughout the six, seven years that we've worked on this thing together, I can't think of any one day where we didn't support each other in some small way. So I think that's a big success factor. The advice I would give any entrepreneur is to always be hopeful. No matter how bad things get or how hopeless things are, you've got to find a way to create the hope within you. You have to find the bright side of whatever it is wherever you are, and motivate yourself with hope rather than push yourself with despair. It's not the right way to motivate yourself. Instead, motivate yourself with positive visions of how you would move forward from wherever you are. Find the hope within you.
H
Host42:40
That's a t-shirt I would love to get. I think that's amazing advice. And the partners, I couldn't agree more. You have to love and trust them, because just like you mentioned about how your wife is part of the journey, your business partner is just like your wife. So I understand that. Well, let me take it to you, Jason. Same question: one piece of advice that you give to the young Canadian startup founder.
J
Jason Smith43:05
It's so hard to think of one, there's so many. I will emphasize the trust side. When you think about your founding partner, trust is absolutely critical in addition to the obvious complementary skill sets. I think there's a word that is overused, interpreted by many differently, and it is culture. If I could put my view on it, I think it's about the talent density and the talent mindset that you bring in early, and how much room you give them to move and where the guardrails are. You're not going to just say it's free and open; you are going to set a bit of the tone of the work ethic, the approach, disarming any ego and getting to the root issue of whatever problem you need to solve without the egos and without the personal agendas. I think that's a tone that the founders can set. So when I think of culture, I think it's about finding the people that want to elevate and put that elevation first. I don't think of it as supportive in a kumbaya kind of thing; it is not a soft thing. It is: how do you find the people that actually enjoy a bit of the pain, enjoy the climb? There's a nice view there, but what's up on that next level? Maybe we go around that next corner. I think certainly at the earliest stages of your startup, you need people that are mountain climbers, that want to elevate and are not going to have the whinging or the whining on the way up that they've got blisters and they're a victim of this. They're just going to find a way to do it and get through it. If somebody is falling down, then they put them on their back, and when they fall down, that person puts them on their back. That is the culture I'm talking about: an elevated, supportive, transparent vulnerability that says we're getting to the damn top of the mountain. Do you want on or not? It ain't a vacation, it's not for everyone. But if you're coming on board for this Everest trip, then let's do it right.
H
Host45:11
Let's do it right. That's awesome. Support, support, support. You know what, maybe you're not going to talk about the blisters, but your partner and your co-workers better notice you have them so they can pick up the slack should you need to. So I think that's fantastic. I love these mountain visions that we're constantly going back to. I hope you guys climb lots of mountains, and I hope you also recognize where the top of that mountain is at some point, because that is somewhere to stand up and sing from high praise. Well, kumbaya if that's where you're going to go. But well, I'll go back to you, Jason. Can you share with me please the name of a Canadian entrepreneurial star or founder that you personally look up to?
J
Jason Smith45:54
Okay, yeah, this is an interesting question. There's so many entrepreneurs I look up to, and there's a whole bunch of them on my cap table that were angel investors, from Better, like Ryan Holmes from Hootsuite, a fantastic supporter of us early, Steve Munford from Sophos, and others. But I'm going to pick Mike Cernibus, and he runs a company called League. There's a specific thing that I really appreciated about Mike. He's an incredibly successful entrepreneur and is building League into a multi-billion dollar likely public outcome, a fantastic Canadian-run business. There was a moment in time when he said, 'Look, in every startup's history and trajectory and journey, you got to decide if you want to be the fly or the elephant. Are you the fly or the elephant?' I didn't fully grasp it at that time, but when we were staring down the barrel of do we want to raise another round that's going to be a high valuation with a big press stack that we're going to need to clear if we sell our company or go public, you kind of have to take this deep breath of you're going for it. That's the elephant moment. The fly moment is you can build a very successful business, keep it tight, bootstrap or small amounts of capital inputs, and look for an amazingly rewarding exit entrepreneurially. There's plenty of flies out there, there's a handful of elephants. I really respected Mike when he shared that. You gotta decide at one point what you want to be. It's hard when there's two people in a room and a whiteboard to say 'I want to be the elephant, you are the fly' at that point, but you have to be thinking about how big you want to take the thing. You're learning to become the elephant.
H
Host47:47
There you go. That's great advice. League, I mean honestly, that's a great company. Hard not to appreciate that. Sorry, tell me a Canadian entrepreneur or founder, or you know what, even if you want to go back to the Indian roots, an Indian founder maybe that'll be of interest too, that you really look up to.
S
Sarathy Naicker48:06
Actually, there are a lot of entrepreneurs that I admire, but I'm going to go with the technologist. Because technology evolution requires a lot of guts and the same entrepreneurship mindset to break through and do something new. You've got to have the courage and the balance between ambition and contentment that it takes to achieve things. So I'm going to pick two Canadian technologists. The early one that I was inspired by was Rob Pike. Rob Pike is probably most recently well known as one of the authors of the Go language. He has been involved in Unix development for many years, he was at Bell Labs in the 60s, and built a lot of the later evolution of what Unix became, Plan 9 and other things. A lot of the foundational things in the Go language were a result of Rob talking about them and inspiring those directions. So Rob was an early influence in the things I learned and what I focused on. Then more recently, a big influence is Geoffrey Hinton, one of the big three AI pioneers, who is Canadian. He's an academic, but he was instrumental in making huge strides in machine learning and deep learning. So that's what I'm going to go with. Over so many years overlooked, and then they said 'I think there's something in this,' and then the world discovers him and he has it right and rightly elevates him. He had it right. I'm really proud to say as a good Canadian that one of our meeting rooms is named after him, which is really important.
H
Host50:10
Which is really important. Well, gents, I'm going to honestly say if I look up to anyone, both of you are a direction I want to go. I'm thinking elephant now, though I'm just a fly in here chatting. So, I just want to say thank you from the Canadian perspective. Thank you for sharing your valuable time with us, for sharing your lessons, and also thank you for bringing capital into the country and showing a model that you don't have to go down to the States, you can do it from here and be successful. With every story of success that comes here and raises great deals of capital, Americans and Europeans take notice and think what other wonderful pearls can we find. So we're taking back the pearl, P-E-R-L to P-E-A-R-L, but that's our language thing in here. But honestly, gents, thank you so much, and congratulations. I hope that you do get to celebrate with your team and with your families and with each other the journey that you're on and still on as you climb that mountain. So cheers and best of luck in the next stages.
S
Sarathy Naicker51:15
Thank you.
J
Jason Smith51:15
Thanks, Chris.