Back
Rajiv Anand
Managing Director & Chief Executive Officer, IndusInd Bank

Indusind Bank Q3 FY26 Earnings Conference Call | Concall.in

🎥 Jan 22, 2026 📺 Concall ⏱ 55m 👁 217 views
Listen to the Indusind Bank Q3 FY26 Earnings Conference Call to hear key management insights, financial performance highlights, and strategic outlook for the quarter. Explore transcripts, summaries, and analysis of thousands of listed companies on - https://www.concall.in 📊 Stay updated with company earnings, financial results, and management commentary — all in one place. 🔔 Subscribe to our channel for more quarterly earnings calls and corporate updates from Indian listed companies.
Watch on YouTube

About Rajiv Anand

Rajiv Anand, Managing Director and CEO of IndusInd Bank, described the first quarter of fiscal year 2027 as a "clear inflection point" for the bank, stating that it has "substantially completed the balance sheet and earnings calibration" undertaken over the past year. In media appearances following the bank's Q1 results, Anand said the bank is now focused on accelerating sustainable growth, noting that he expects the bank to "start to grow in line with market" this year and that the exit position at the end of 2027 will position the bank to "dominate in our focus areas from 28 onwards." He attributed Q1 growth to the corporate side, stating that while corporate loan growth may be net interest margin-dilutive, it is positive from an operating expense and credit cost perspective. Anand also said the bank's board passed an enabling resolution to raise both debt and equity, but emphasized that the bank's capital position remains strong with a total capital adequacy ratio in excess of 17% and a Common Equity Tier 1 ratio above 16%, and that there are no immediate plans to raise capital. When asked about a decline in the bank's stock price following the earnings announcement, Anand stated, "That's not a question for me to answer. What I have control on is how I manage my business. I leave it to the markets on how they want to react on a day-to-day basis." He also addressed expectations for net interest margins, saying he wanted to "put to rest that the FCNR(B) money is not that cheap" and acknowledged there could be some margin pressure in the second quarter due to incoming liquidity, but expressed confidence that the bank has "enough engines of high yielding growth" to protect margins over the remaining three quarters.

Source: AI-verified profile updated from Rajiv Anand's recent appearances. Browse all interviews →

Transcript (84 segments)
O
Operator0:00
Ladies and gentlemen, good day and welcome to IndusInd Bank Limited Q3 FY26 earnings conference call. As a reminder, all participant lines will be in listen-only mode and there will be an opportunity for you to ask questions after the presentation concludes. Should you need assistance during this conference call, please signal an operator by pressing star then zero on your touch-tone phone. I now hand the conference over to Mr. Rajiv Anand, Managing Director and CEO, IndusInd Bank. Thank you and over to you to Mr. Anand.
R
Rajiv Anand0:36
Good evening and thank you everyone for joining us today. I'm joined here by the senior management team of IndusInd Bank. I'll start with a quick overview on the macro environment and then go into bank-specific developments. The global environment remains uncertain with shifting trade policies and a possible tilt towards a multipolar world order. Amidst this backdrop, the Indian economy continues to demonstrate resilience. Demand indicators improved during the quarter building on the festival season uptick, GST benefits and better supply conditions. High frequency data indicates that overall activity stayed firm post the festival season though a few indicators softened on a higher base. Inflation outlook remains benign and policy support is expected to continue towards growth acceleration. Bank credit growth improved across key sectors during this quarter and the momentum is expected to continue supported by policy measures and constructive macro environment. We will now move to the key highlights of Q3 FY26 and then cover business-specific progress and financial performance. We continued our approach of rightsizing the balance sheet by shedding inefficient assets and liabilities and allocating growth capital towards areas of focus. Our average deposits de-grew by 1% driven entirely by the reduction in bulk deposits. The average retail deposits were stable quarter on quarter and grew albeit modestly on a period end basis. As a consequence, share of retail deposits inched up from 47.2% to 47.5% from 47% quarter on quarter. On the asset side, disbursements were robust in the vehicle finance retail and granular corporate book. However, our average loan book de-grew 2% driven by continued rundown in micro finance loans and risk-reward-driven calibration in the corporate book. Slippages during the quarter have been rangebound in all businesses except micro finance loans. Slippages in micro finance loans remained elevated as last quarter. We have implemented stringent underwriting norms earlier this year. These norms have shown effect as incremental stress formation is reducing consistently. We continue to work towards reduction in outstanding stress book as is evident in quarter on quarter reduction in net NPA, net security receipts and the restructured book. We have made considerable progress on streamlining of the organization structure and identifying the right talent to drive the bank's future growth. Since the last analyst call, we have onboarded a new head of wholesale bank, chief human resources officer, chief data officer, a new CEO for BIL, head of MSME business and head digital among others. There are a few more positions expected to be announced in this quarter. With this, the top leadership team will largely be in place and I am confident that this strengthened leadership team with diverse experience is well positioned to deliver on our strategic agenda. We are also pleased to welcome Mr. Arijit Basu as our new chairman bringing over four decades of leadership experience in the Indian banking industry. I also want to thank Mr. Sunil Mehta upon completion of his tenure as chairman for his steadfast leadership and unwavering support through challenging times. The financial outcome for Q3: our pre-provision operating profit at 2,270 crores grew 11% quarter on quarter supported by improved net revenues and disciplined cost management. Provisions remained high given elevated flows in the micro finance business and write off of accumulated NPAs. As a result, profit after tax for the quarter was at 128 crores. The capital adequacy remains healthy at CET1 of 15.74% and CR of 16.94%. I will now take you through the highlights of individual businesses: vehicle finance. The vehicle industry and consequently our vehicle finance business saw robust momentum during the quarter on the back of GST changes announced by the government. Our vehicle disbursements at 12,900 crores increased by 26% quarter on quarter. As a result, the vehicle finance loan book growth inched up by 2% quarter on quarter compared to the muted growth over the last couple of quarters. The loan book now stands at 98,196 crores. We saw broad-based pickup in disbursements across vehicle categories led by MHCVs, tractors and passenger vehicles. The gross and net slippages have shown improvement on a year on year basis for all three quarters of this year. We expect the trend to continue in Q4 as well resulting in a full year FY26 asset quality outcome which is expected to be better than FY25. Looking ahead, we remain optimistic about vehicle demand supported by fiscal and monetary measures already announced. Any further consumption supportive or tax relief measures in the upcoming union budget will bolster this outlook. Rural and priority banking: I believe rural banking presents a large underserved opportunity and expanding our presence here remains a key strategic opportunity. Scaling products beyond micro finance allows us to address this opportunity in a more diversified and granular manner while also supporting our PSL requirements. The Bharat Financial Inclusion Limited, BIL, is now led by Tapasratna Choudhury as MD and CEO. Tapasratna is a seasoned leader with over 26 years of experience in the micro finance, retail and rural lending businesses. As mentioned earlier, the bank has tightened the asset quality norms for micro finance loans earlier this year. We have seen an improvement in early stress indicators. We continue to monitor the collection efficiency and aim to move towards normalization in the coming months. 31 to 90 days past due was 2.4% in December 25 versus 3.2% in September 25. We have also gradually started increasing our microloan disbursements within our revised underwriting framework. Our microloan disbursements were 3,598 crores during the quarter. However, given the contractual rundowns of over 6,300 crores during the quarter, our microloan business de-grew by 6,669 crores. Disbursements during the quarter were directed towards high vintage well-performing customers and centers and is currently under the process of being covered under the CGFMU credit guarantee which will take the CGFMU coverage to around 38% of the standard book as of December 25. While early bucket stress indicators have shown improvements, our focus continues to be on a sustainable normalization rather than near-term book growth. With reinforced underwriting, tighter controls and new leadership at BIL, we are committed to growing this portfolio in a calibrated and risk-aware manner. In terms of our other rural products, we have shown a few of our rural focused product portfolios which have reached certain scale in our investor presentation. Our aim is to build a comprehensive suite of products tailored to the rural customer needs. Within this, we continue to scale our merchant loan book which now stands at 7,338 crores growing 16% year on year spread over 579,000 merchant borrowers. Our affordable housing loan book at 2,692 crores grew 25% year on year while the Kisan credit and other rural loans at 4,267 crores remain steady quarter on quarter. Our consumer banking assets: these are traditional retail assets which will be the key growth driver as we build universal banking franchise. Our home loan book continues to see strong momentum with outstanding of 6,114 crores growing 94% year on year and 10% quarter on quarter. Personal loans at 10,598 crores grew 12% year on year and the credit card loan book at 10,264 crores de-grew by 6% year on year. As we remain watchful of asset quality trends, credit card spends for the quarter were at 16,318 crores. We rationalized some of our spends which were not efficient for the bank on an overall profitability basis. The retail spends remain robust growing 5% quarter on quarter. Overall consumer banking assets at 31,057 crores grew 18% year on year. SME banking: as you all know India has a large and vibrant SME segment. The bank has a relatively small presence in this space. I believe this provides us a large opportunity to diversify our loan book and provide the next growth booster. We have strengthened our team in this space with Ramaswamy Gopalakrishnan joining us as head commercial banking and middle market at the bank. Ramaswamy is a veteran in this segment with over two decades of experience across leading foreign and private sector banks. In this role, Ramaswamy will spearhead the bank's strategy and businesses in SME and mid-market segments with a strong focus on driving growth, deepening client relationships and delivering innovative solutions to these critical sectors. We are reorganizing our structure to serve the segment with appropriate distribution. The portfolio currently stands at 43,957 crores and there is robust scope for us to grow in the years to come. As we disclosed earlier, Ganesh Sankaran has joined us as head wholesale banking at IndusInd. Ganesh brings over three decades of experience across wholesale, retail, credit and SME, playing a pivotal role in building businesses, driving large scale business transformations and delivering consistent performance. We have revised our coverage model to ensure optimal management and customer responsiveness across client segments, strengthening our position as a universal franchise and staying aligned with our strategic business objectives. Our strategy for the Wholesale Bank Group specifically anchors around continued granularization of the franchise, expanding growth frontiers, building sustainable and cost-effective liability franchise, and a future ready organization for superior client experience. We have started with rationalizing exposures where we don't see meaningful risk-adjusted returns even a few quarters down the road. As a consequence, our wholesale banking loans de-grew. The proportion of A and above rated customers and the weighted average rating of the wholesale bank portfolio were at 82% and 2.54 respectively. The asset quality remains healthy with slippages remaining within our expected range. The gems and jewelry business maintains robust collections with no SMA 1 or 2 customers. Now coming to liabilities: the quantity and quality of deposits is my foremost priority and a bulk of my attention and resources are allocated towards this. We have already made considerable progress in terms of streamlining organizational structures, strengthening the branch as a focal point, prioritizing digital delivery and enabling frontline relationship managers. We integrated affluent pioneer branch operations and the entire NRI segments into branch banking creating a unified retail banking model across our deposit branches that enhances scale, unlocks synergies and shifts us towards a more customer-centric branch-led engagement framework for a high quality and consistent service delivery. We have multiple variants of branches through vehicle, micro finance and mainstream branches with restricted bouquet of offerings available in these branches. We are now consolidating multiple formats and making them universal branches in suitable locations. This should drive synergy for both assets and liabilities in leveraging our existing distribution. We have also created a new senior leadership position as chief data officer to effectively and efficiently use data analytics in all the decisions that we make. Balaji Narayan Murthy in this role will be responsible to drive the bank's data strategy, business intelligence, advanced analytics, AI initiatives and data engineering capabilities. Our digital banking app Indie now has monthly active users of over 2.7 million customers conducting 4.3 million app-led transactions in Q3 FY26. Our recently launched Indie for Business has seen monthly active user base increase by 220,000 MSME customers. Our focused efforts on enhancing efficiency in customer acquisition has started showing early results in terms of improving new-to-bank growth as well as productivity across channels. We should see this translating into revival in retail deposits in the coming quarters. Cost of deposits for the quarter at 6.09% improved by 14 basis points quarter on quarter largely driven by term deposit repricing. We reduced our dependence on bulk resources with CDs down 3% quarter on quarter and borrowings at 39,242 crores down 13% quarter on quarter. We have maintained a healthy liquidity position during the quarter with average LCR at 122% and average surplus liquidity at 43,000 crores. I will now hand over to Viral, our CFO, to take you through the financial performance.
V
Viral14:48
Thanks Rajiv and good evening everyone. Similar to last quarter we will focus on sequential trends all through my commentary. So let me now go through some of the details starting with the balance sheet. Average advances dropped 2% sequentially from quarter 2 driven by decline in wholesale banking advances and micro loan book. Average deposits dropped 1% driven by reduction in wholesale deposits. Retail deposits as per LCR perspective remained steady. Average C-D ratio improved to 83.7% versus 84.3% quarter on quarter. Borrowings have been brought down by 13% quarter on quarter. Moving on to P&L, net interest income for Q3 stood at 4,562 crores. Reported NIM was 3.52% and this included a 17 basis point benefit from interest on income tax refunds and a one-off interest recovery. So normalized NIM adjusting for these items was 3.35% versus 3.32% quarter on quarter and that reflects improvements in cost of funds from TD repricing and liquidity optimization which was partially offset by adverse loan mix with further degrowth in the microloans book. Non-interest income has come in at 1,575 crores growing 2% quarter on quarter while overall non-interest income at 1,707 crores grew 3% quarter on quarter. Our operating expenses of 3,999 crores includes 230 crores of one-off impact owing to provisions related to change in the labor code. The operating profit for the quarter at 2,270 crores grew 11% quarter on quarter. Provisions and contingencies for the quarter stood at 296 crores and we have written off loans amounting to 2,612 crores during this quarter. In terms of asset quality, GNPA and NNPA were at 3.56% and 1.04% and overall PCR was maintained at 72%. Slippages excluding microloans continued to remain rangebound. We have also added segment wise slippages and NPA details in our investor presentation. Our SMA 1 and SMA 2 book was at 17 basis points versus 26 basis points quarter on quarter. Net security receipts declined to 9 basis points versus 17 basis points quarter on quarter and restructured advances declined to 7 basis points versus 8 basis points quarter on quarter. So overall we have returned to quarterly profitability with profit after tax of 128 crores and the bank continues to have healthy capital adequacy and liquidity position with CET1 at 15.74% and CR of 16.94% and LCR at 122%. So with that let me now hand it over back to Rajiv for his closing remarks.
R
Rajiv Anand18:25
Thank you Viral. To summarize, this quarter reflects progress on balance sheet strengthening, gradual pickup in core retail businesses, disciplined liability optimization and progress on building a robust leadership team and organizational structure. Looking ahead, we are working on a three-year strategy anchored around PACE. Protect the endowments, accelerate on key priorities, customer centricity, and execution excellence. Protect the endowments: I believe the bank has unique strengths in terms of vehicle finance, deep rural presence complemented with a robust corporate franchise. We aim to preserve this and not make changes for the sake of making changes. We will bolster these and evolve as per the operating environment and they will remain core to the future of this bank. Accelerate key priorities: These are areas where we need to improve either of scale, efficiency or quality of business. We do this inter alia including building a more granular low-cost deposit base, scaling our SME and mid-market franchise and improving stakeholder perceptions. Customer centricity: We are keeping the customer at the center of all our actions by unifying engagement across one IndusInd, driving digital adoption and elevating service quality. The ever evolving technology will play a big role in bridging if not surpassing the gap with peers. Execution excellence: I believe execution rigor should differentiate the outcomes in an industry which is regulated and largely commoditized. We are working towards building a strong execution-oriented culture, sharper performance accountability, tighter cost management and efficient product delivery. With this we are now open to Q&A. I must also inform you that we have revamped our investor presentation providing much more disclosures. We will continue to refine these as we progress and any feedback on this is most welcome. Thank you and over to all of you.
O
Operator20:40
Thank you very much. We'll now begin with the question and answer session. Anyone who wishes to ask a question may press star and one on their touch-tone telephone. If you wish to remove yourself from the question queue, you may press star and two. Participants are requested to use handsets while asking your question. Ladies and gentlemen, we will wait for a moment while the question queue assembles. The first question is from that of Kunal Sha from Citi Group. Please go ahead.
K
Kunal Sha21:26
Yeah. Are you able to hear me?
R
Rajiv Anand21:28
Yes, I can hear you. Kunal.
K
Kunal Sha21:31
Yeah. So the first question was on net NPA: it is still at 1.04% and the slippage also appears to be sticky across the segment. So when we look at it, say MFI, it's been at still more than 1,000 odd crores, but vehicles still continuing at 690, when we look at the consumer banking still closer to like 470 odd crores. So there is not much of an improvement on this slippage and eventually when we look at it on the net NPA side, we indicated that we would endeavor to bring it down to 0.5%. But it doesn't seem like there has been an increase in the provisioning coverage. So if you can share in terms of what would be the plans with respect to net NPA.
V
Viral22:15
So hi, this is Viral. Let me just share some perspective on what's really happening here. What we shared in the previous quarter is we want to make sure that we are consistent in our provisioning and write off policies across our business segments. What you saw in the last quarter was the appropriate provisioning and write off on the micro finance business. But as you rightly pointed out, gross slippages have been pretty much sustained even in this quarter as well. It's pretty much the same elevated levels as the previous quarter and as we keep writing off, what happens is the portion we are writing off is largely 100% provided, so that kind of brings down the provisioning because you write off that portion, and then we provide on the incremental slippages at the appropriate level of provisioning. So what you will see is the PCR being stable and as slippages start dropping in subsequent quarters you will see that improve. But PCR is an outcome, it's not like we are maintaining provisions to be at a number, but it's simply the impact of large write offs that we are doing in a more prudent manner which really brings down the PCR and then you build it back up with normal provisioning. So that's kind of what's happening.
K
Kunal Sha23:32
So any target for net NPA?
R
Rajiv Anand23:36
See, I think, Kunal, the aim is to bring down the stress book through write offs etc. But I think we need to keep the interest of all our stakeholders in mind. Our intent is to bring down net NPA well below 1%, in the 60-70 basis points vicinity over a period of time.
K
Kunal Sha24:05
Got it. And in terms of this entire right sizing of the balance sheet both on assets as well as on the liability side, where are we in that journey? How much time would it actually take in terms of running down the bulk and maybe lowering the corporate book as well? And when should we start seeing the acceleration in the overall loan growth? No doubt on the retail side and some of the focus segments the growth has still been there, but when do we start seeing the overall growth picking up?
R
Rajiv Anand24:39
As I mentioned in the last quarter as well, our intent is to grow in line with market in the year FY26-27 and be in the vicinity of 1% ROA as we get to the back end of that year.
K
Kunal Sha24:57
Got it. So the industry average growth by end of FY27.
R
Rajiv Anand25:01
That's correct.
K
Kunal Sha25:03
Okay. Thanks. That's helpful. Thanks and all the best.
R
Rajiv Anand25:07
Thank you.
O
Operator25:11
Thank you. Next question is from the line of J Mundra from ICICI Securities. Please go ahead.
J
J Mundra25:19
Yeah. Hi, good evening Rajiv and thanks for the improved disclosure, sir. Sir, on presentation and in your opening remarks you also mentioned that there is some improving trends on NII in terms of new delinquency or new stress recognition. If you can provide SMA 1 and 2 number for MFI, that will ideally give more picture; you have given some certain disclosures but somehow the absolute number of SMA 1 and 2 would be really helpful.
R
Rajiv Anand25:50
We have mentioned in the opening remark the SMA 1 and 30 to 90 DPD is 2.4% against 3.2% last quarter.
J
J Mundra26:02
Okay. Sure. Thanks, Indrajit. And on the PACE strategy, you mentioned that PACE would mean protection as well as acceleration of some businesses. Where would MFI fall into this framework? Would it be like acceleration or would it be like protection?
R
Rajiv Anand26:26
I think, as I mentioned in the last quarter as well, the micro finance business is a very critical business for this bank for multiple reasons. It is a business that if run well is a very profitable one. And perhaps more important is that as the industry continues to grow, I do believe that meeting PSL and particularly agri and within that the small and marginal farmer is going to become increasingly difficult and here is an engine that meets that requirement for us. So both from a profitability perspective and the fact that we are able to start to grow other products within this space which is our Bharat superstore business which I spoke about, and the fact that this is going to meet our critical PSL requirements makes this a very important business for us. We also recognize the fact that it is cyclical in nature and therefore as I said in my opening remarks, we are using the credit guarantee schemes and the aim is to take that coverage to 100% thereby eliminating the tail risk on the micro finance business. So if we are able to do that and manage the proportionality of the business somewhere between 7 to 8% of our asset side, I do believe that we can build a more predictable and profitable micro finance business going forward.
J
J Mundra28:26
Sure. That helps. And last question, sir: you mentioned that you have intention to grow in line with the system by FY27, but would it be fair to say that on a Q basis the bank should now be on a growth track? Or could it be maybe beginning from FY27? How would you put the overall loan growth?
R
Rajiv Anand28:48
I don't want to guide quarter on quarter, but I stand by what I said last quarter that our intent is to grow in line with the industry in FY26-27.
J
J Mundra29:03
Thank you and all the best.
R
Rajiv Anand29:04
Thank you.
O
Operator29:06
Thank you. Next question is from the line of Riken Sha from IFL Capital. Please go ahead.
R
Riken Sha29:14
Hi, good evening everyone. I had three questions. So the first one is: going back to the net NPA point, some back of the envelope calculation suggests that if we have to bring down our net NPA to 0.5-0.6%, and given the net slippages that we have, it looks like for next three quarters whatever PPOP we make will largely be used to just provide and bring down that net NPA. So is it a fair assessment to say that for next few more quarters the operating profitability will just be used to bring down the net NPA? That's number one. Second, Rajiv, on your earlier point on the PACE strategy, while you briefly alluded to what are the segments that you want to focus on etc, but any broad level detail strategy or the financial targets you would want to put it down as yet? Or maybe that will happen at some point later. So that's the second one. And the third one is on capital. I know that you mentioned in the past the capital levels are sufficient, but first if you could quantify what is the potential impact from the ECL whenever the transition happens from 1st April on the net worth on pro forma basis, and the fact that while the ROEs are depressed and once you start growing again you'll be consuming capital, so what looks like as sufficient? I'm not sure whether we have enough growth capital. So what would be your thoughts on capital raise and if and when that happens.
R
Rajiv Anand30:48
So let me take question two and question three first. On the PACE strategy, we will obviously share more details in the months to come. As far as capital is concerned, why do I need capital at this stage? I would first stay focused on getting growth impulses back, particularly on the liability side, because we have enough engines of growth on the asset side including some of the new engines like SME. That will take us deep into FY26-27. Growth capital is not something that we require, and even if we do consume at a relatively lower ROE or ROA, I think we have more than sufficient for at least the next 12 to 18 months. I'll let Viral answer the net NPA question and the ECL impact.
V
Viral32:16
Sure. So let me answer the first question and break it into two parts. First is your point about a large chunk of PPOP going towards credit provisioning. Now that's an outcome of the level of slippages. It's true that for past two quarters they've been elevated, but we are seeing clear signs of that coming down in the next quarter. So as that starts dropping, you will obviously see a much lower level of credit provisioning. So that answers your first question about are we going to continue eating up all our PPOP. Now your second question about net NPA: again, we are going to be following very consistent provisioning policies and that's something we've done from the last quarter itself and we will continue to do that. So as the NPA starts dropping, the absolute also starts dropping. So that's really how that net NPA number starts coming down. On ECL, our initial impact is between 1.5% of the loan book to 1.7%.
R
Riken Sha33:55
Got it. Thanks. On the net NPA point, in your own assessment when do you really think we should be able to reach our target range? Is it like FY27 or you would want to do it a lot more gradually maybe over until even FY28 as well?
R
Rajiv Anand34:11
We will evaluate every quarter depending on how the revenues are pacing out, how the asset quality pans out in some of the large businesses. So we don't want to guide a specific target. Let's see how each quarter goes and then we will update you.
R
Riken Sha34:26
Got it. Thanks. Thank you everyone.
O
Operator34:31
Thank you. Next question is from line of Abhishek Varaka from HSBC. Please go ahead.
A
Abhishek Varaka34:39
Yeah. Hi. So Rajiv, one question on growth. Now I know you guided for FY27, but if we look at two three years on a more steady state basis, where do you see it? What kind of growth are you aspiring to?
R
Rajiv Anand34:55
I think the way I'm thinking about this is basically year 1 which is FY26-27 grow in line with market, FY27-28 start to gain market share, and FY28-29 start to dominate in some of the focus areas that we have built out.
A
Abhishek Varaka35:17
But when you say gain market share, would you have a certain spread to industry or something in mind, or a number maybe given the size and the reacceleration in growth?
R
Rajiv Anand35:30
I don't have a number at hand. For example, some of our large businesses like our vehicle finance business, we have about a 7.5% market share, our intent is to take that back to 9% as we go forward. Similarly, we will continue to gain market share on our micro finance business. As we accelerate our SME businesses in the short to medium term, I'm fairly certain that we will be able to gain market share. But I think the key to all this is to be able to improve both the quality and quantity on the liability side. As we all know, there is a mad scramble for deposits in the banking system. So I am actually not very concerned about being able to gain market share on the asset side. I think the challenge for us will certainly be to be able to improve the quality and quantity of liabilities as we go forward.
A
Abhishek Varaka36:43
Right. And just in terms of the micro finance slippage, I know the SMA 1 and 2 number looks actually quite good, but does it indicate that from Q4 onwards the slippage should come down materially because if you look at the rest of the industry they are already in that phase and I guess for you you may be like one quarter off but shouldn't be more than that. Is that a fair assumption?
R
Rajiv Anand37:09
It is.
A
Abhishek Varaka37:12
Okay, perfect. And finally, it would help just to get some sense on a medium-term ROA aspiration. It may be three years, four years down the line, but just from a steady state perspective where do you think you can get to and some sort of bridge to it or what will be the key levers at least going forward? Something like that would be really useful so that you can get a view beyond FY27.
R
Rajiv Anand37:44
That's a fair ask, which is why we decided to seed the idea of PACE with all of you. We will share more details which will give you color on the possibility of execution and the execution rigor that is going into all of that in due course.
A
Abhishek Varaka38:11
Got it. Okay. Thank you and all the best.
O
Operator38:24
Thank you. Next question is from line of Chintan from Autonomous. Please go ahead.
C
Chintan38:30
Hi, thank you for taking my question. I also have three questions. Can I follow up on your last answer regarding the ROA bridge? Over the next two to three months you're bound to talk to investors, they're bound to ask you this question. You will give some color. We will hear that feedback. It would be helpful if you will give us some idea about what that bridge looks like. What are the main levers that you have on cost of risk? We can obviously assume some amount of normalization, but where are your cost of funds going, what is your asset mix going to add to that risk? So some color there if you could see it now as well would be helpful. My second question is on your slippages. You hinted to a policy change on slippages. Could you help us quantify that if you were on your old policy, what would that slippage number be? So we can understand the policy change, how much of that slippage is driven by that? And then my final question is why are vehicle finance slippages running at a higher pace? It's been high for a while. What's driving that and what is the road to improvement?
R
Rajiv Anand39:48
On the ROA question, what I've been saying is that this is a three-year journey; year one is really to start to grow in line with market with 1% ROA, and you can do some numbers on your own given the commentary that you have heard from us. The vehicle finance and micro finance business will continue to be a critical component for us, i.e., higher yielding assets. We will add the SME business and to some degree defocus on the very large corporate business. There is space for us to grow our entire agri franchise including gold loans which will help us meet some of our PSL requirements. Given where we are on cost of funds and utilization including renewed focus on current accounts should benefit us from improved cost of funds in the medium term. We are already working on a fairly elaborate cost takeout. If you look at cost to assets, currently there is a bit of a denominator effect because assets are not growing, but cost to assets continues to be elevated. So as I look across the ROA tree, there are opportunities to improve pretty much on each of these lines: on NIM through benefits on cost of funds, fee incomes both on retail and corporate, some cost takeouts, and be able to reduce credit costs as we go forward. So in that sense, you can clearly see that there are opportunities. The question is how long will it take to execute all this? I think it's a three-year journey at least. On the vehicle finance slippage, let me ask Shiram who heads that business to take this.
S
Shiram42:30
Yeah. Good evening. Slippage will be better than last year. The slippage will be both on absolute terms and on percentage terms lower than last year. We are expecting a 20 basis point lowering of slippage during this current year. Having said that, the vehicle industry, particularly CV, has been going through a bit of a strain because of the GST changes. People have been taking 28% and discounting the rates to customers which has caught them out a bit. But having said that, it is a good thing for the industry in the long run; the entire industry will be benefited by such move. The rest of the products are doing much better than last year.
C
Chintan43:19
Thank you. And then finally on that slippages question, the policy change impact on the slippages?
V
Viral43:25
Let me answer that. Slippages is not policy driven. That is basically IRAC norms and normal identification of NPA. So that is not policy driven. What is driven by policy is at what point you write off and what is the quantum of provisioning that you need to do. That change, again, is not something we've done this quarter. You saw that last quarter where we changed or upped our provisioning maintenance on the micro finance business and also at what point do we write off. So both those changes were made in the last quarter itself and not a this quarter event, but nothing to do with slippages; that's more on write off.
C
Chintan44:05
Thank you.
O
Operator44:08
Thank you. Next question is from line of Piran Engineer from CLSA India. Please go ahead.
P
Piran Engineer44:16
Yeah. Hi, it's Piran and thanks for the enhanced disclosures. Just firstly, a quick data or quarterly question: the other opex has declined quite meaningfully quarter on quarter from about 2,700 to close to 2,400. Anything to relate to this?
V
Viral44:38
Yeah. So let me try and answer that. If you look at quarter on quarter comparison, first point to make is we've already absorbed 228 crores impact simply from the labor law change where the gratuity provisioning needed to be upped. So that's already built into our Q3 expenses and you're right that if you adjust for that, expenses have actually come down roughly 240 crores quarter on quarter. Now there is some amount of impact from higher expenses that we booked in Q2 like GST provisioning and also we changed some expenses related to business activities. So some of that was 150 crores, and the remaining 96 crores is a real save that we've achieved through operational excellence and all the initiatives that we are trying to do. So yes, we are calibrating expenses very tightly and tracking that to bring in OPEX efficiency. As Rajiv said, we are going to be focusing on bringing down the OPEX percentage because we do believe there is opportunity there.
P
Piran Engineer45:50
Got it. Okay. Thanks for that. Secondly, moving on to more mid-term questions. With the MFI share shrinking, I know you touched upon how it's important from a PSL perspective, but it's already down from like 9% to 6% of book in the last two quarters and probably a year later it might be even lower. So how are we thinking about bridging the gap? And you also mentioned your Bharat super store which is the merchant loan business. Does that also qualify for PSL?
R
Rajiv Anand46:23
On the Bharat, not obviously agri. So it won't be FMF, but it'll still be general category; MSME it will be under MSME, it is PSL.
P
Piran Engineer46:38
Okay. Whereas the MFI business was under NSN or under SMF or Hungary?
R
Rajiv Anand46:46
SMF 85.
P
Piran Engineer46:50
So we are losing the SMF contribution from MFI business but we are gaining it in the MSME. But net I think...
R
Rajiv Anand46:57
It's not an either or. Why don't you finish your question?
P
Piran Engineer47:02
So I mean, Rajiv, I'm losing you. ... how do we intend to bridge the gap with our share of MFI going down?
R
Rajiv Anand47:28
As we've explained over the last couple of quarters, we have seen degrowth on the MFI book over the last two quarters including this quarter. Having said that, there has been a significant increase in disbursements in this quarter really from the middle of October. So to that extent, the full benefit of disbursements will come through in Q4 when disbursements will be higher than the repayments we receive and the book will start to grow from Q4 onwards. So the degrowth that you have seen we should be able to recoup as we get into FY26-27, helping us fix the proportionality and meeting a significant component of our requirements for agri and SMF.
P
Piran Engineer48:34
Okay. Fair enough. Secondly, I think while I understand you don't want to give the drivers of the improvement in ROA, but even if I assume that slippages in MFI half from where they are, the credit cost might improve 50 bps or so, it's still quite a hard task to get to 1% ROA within the next five quarters and on top of that we want to grow at 12-13% next year. So just trying to think about what are the risks here. One thing you've already identified is the ability to raise deposits at scale and at a lower cost, but it seems like a stretch. Or am I reading it wrong?
R
Rajiv Anand49:13
You know, let's see how each quarter goes. As we have been saying, it's not going to be a given that ROA improvement will happen every quarter without doing everything. Bulk of the improvement will come from credit costs. This quarter Q3 credit cost is 2.6%. The bank as you know has operated at 130-140 basis points when micro finance was at around 10-11%. So with micro finance at a lower share, obviously the business has to operate at a much lower credit cost. So there is significant scope for improvement. Plus the margins that we are delivering today, the fees that we are delivering today, they are lower than what their potential is. So there is scope across the board, but giving an exact bridge right now is too early. Every week things are changing, every quarter things are changing, so let's take one quarter at a time and that's why we are not giving quarter specific guidance. Let's reach 1% first. Some of you have actually asked us the other way around, saying that 1% is too low for a bank of your loan mix, so let's take one step at a time and then revisit.
P
Piran Engineer50:31
But if you were to sacrifice one of the two, what would it be? The growth target, which is maintaining market share effectively meaning 12-13% growth, or the 1% ROA?
R
Rajiv Anand50:47
I think for a banking business, growth particularly on the corporate side which is not profitable is very easy to do. So the composition of the growth is as important and what part of that growth we are sacrificing is as important. We are a relatively small player in the larger banking industry, so I don't think it's an either or in a very simplistic sense. If push comes to shove, yes, there are opportunities for us to shed growth without impacting PPOP. So stuff like that we will certainly do if required.
P
Piran Engineer51:46
Got it. Okay. That's it from my end. Thanks and wish you all the best.
R
Rajiv Anand51:50
Thank you so much.
O
Operator51:55
Thank you. Next question is from Parka from 361 Capital. Please go ahead.
P
Parka52:01
Yeah. Hi sir. Thanks a lot for the opportunity. What would be the drag on LCR on once the new LCR norms in?
V
Viral52:17
Yeah. From 1st April on the mobile and the internet banking. There is a small impact. It's not going to be a big impact because of that.
P
Parka52:35
Thank you.
O
Operator52:37
Next question is from line of Riken Sha from IFL Capital. Please go ahead.
R
Riken Sha52:46
Hi. V, this is the question for you. You earlier mentioned that the write off and provisioning policy were changed last quarter. Would you be able to just remind us what those changes are and what's the current write off provisioning policy? Thanks.
V
Viral53:00
So obviously that's different across various segments of the business as in vehicle finance, consumer and secured micro finance, but I think the biggest driver for us is clearly the micro finance business. So the change we really made last quarter is the point at which we write off. So we are now writing off at 365 days post NPA. That's one change, and on provisioning it's staggered depending on the number of months outstanding post NPA, but broadly somewhere between 78 to 80% kind of PCR on that book. So that's really the key change here. On the rest we basically just aligned it to where our LGD kind of number where we need to be on provisioning level.
R
Riken Sha53:49
Okay, thank you.
O
Operator53:53
Thank you. Next question is from line of Anit Byani from Namora. Please go ahead.
A
Anit Byani54:00
Yes. Hi. Thank you for the opportunity. I just wanted to ask if the RBI annual supervision outcome has been done like it has been done for other large banks with respect to Agri PSL. Has there been any impact of that?
R
Rajiv Anand54:18
See, the RBI discussions with the bank are confidential in nature. We won't be in a position to comment on it till the discussions are conclusive. As and when required, we will make whatever announcements are there. So difficult to comment on it. We will give any information as and when it is appropriate.
A
Anit Byani54:42
Okay. And the second question is what would be our exposure to Adani group?
R
Rajiv Anand54:48
We don't disclose company level exposure. We had disclosed this specifically in stock exchange two years back when there were some market news. Since then the exposure has come down a little bit.
A
Anit Byani55:03
Okay. Thank you.
O
Operator55:07
Thank you very much, ladies and gentlemen. We'll take that as the last question. I'll now end the conference with Mr. Rajiv Anand for closing comments.
R
Rajiv Anand55:18
I thank each one of you for your interest in IndusInd Bank and for being on this call. I take this opportunity to wish each one of you a very happy new year as well. Thank you once again.
O
Operator55:34
Thank you very much on behalf of IndusInd Bank. That concludes this conference. Thank you for joining us and you may now disconnect your lines.