Back
C. Wei
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer, TSMC (Taiwan semiconductor manufacturing)

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd ($TSM) Q2 2025 Earnings Call

🎥 Jul 17, 2025 📺 Castify Earnings Call ⏱ 76m 👁 2 views
Good afternoon everyone and welcome to TSMC's second quarter 2025 earnings conference and conference call this is Jeff Sue ...
Watch on YouTube

About C. Wei

C. Wei, Chairman and CEO of TSMC, has been actively addressing the company's capacity expansion and AI-driven demand in recent earnings calls. In the Q2 2026 call, he announced an additional $100 billion investment in Arizona to build fabs for 2-nanometer and advanced packaging technologies, citing strong multi-year demand from US customers. He stated that the AI mega trend continues to drive robust demand for leading-edge silicon, and that TSMC's conviction in the multi-year AI outlook remains very high. In earlier calls, Wei noted that TSMC's wafer supply, not power consumption, is currently the bottleneck for AI infrastructure, and that he has spent significant time speaking directly with cloud service providers to validate demand before committing to large capital expenditures. Wei has also addressed geopolitical and market uncertainties. In the Q2 2025 call, he said TSMC had not seen changes in customer behavior due to tariff policies but acknowledged risks to consumer-related segments. He reaffirmed that TSMC is not engaged in discussions regarding joint ventures or technology licensing with other companies. Regarding overseas expansion, Wei stated that TSMC is executing its plans in Japan and Europe as scheduled, and that these investments in specialty technology are not competing with leading-edge expansion in the US. He described the current environment as one of "fragmented globalization," where overseas fab costs are higher for all manufacturers, but TSMC aims to remain cost-effective through manufacturing scale and technology leadership.

Source: AI-verified profile updated from C. Wei's recent appearances. Browse all interviews →

Transcript (100 segments)
J
Jeff Su0:00
Good afternoon everyone and welcome to TSMC's second quarter 2025 earnings conference and conference call. This is Jeff Su, TSMC's director of investor relations and your host for today. Today's event is being webcast live through TSMC's website at www.tsmc.com where you can also download the earnings release materials. If you are joining us through the conference call, your dial-in lines are in listen-only mode. The format for today's event will be as follows. First, TSMC senior vice president and CFO, Mr. Wendell Huang, will summarize our operations in the second quarter 2025 followed by our guidance for the third quarter 2025. Afterwards, Mr. Huang and TSMC's chairman and CEO, Dr. C.C. Wei, will jointly provide the company's key messages. Then we will open both the floor and the line for the question and answer session. As usual, I would like to remind everybody that today's discussions may contain forward-looking statements that are subject to significant risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements. Please refer to the safe harbor notice that appears on our press release. And now, I would like to turn the microphone over to TSMC CFO, Mr. Wendell Huang, for the summary of operations and the current quarter guidance.
W
Wendell Huang1:33
Thank you, Jeff. Good afternoon, everyone. Thank you for joining us today. My presentation will start with financial highlights for the second quarter 2025. After that, I will provide the guidance for the third quarter of 2025. Second quarter revenue increased 11.3% sequentially in NT as our revenue was supported by strong demand for our industry-leading 3-nanometer and 5-nanometer technologies, partially offset by an unfavorable foreign exchange rate. In US dollar terms, revenue increased 17.8% sequentially to $30.1 billion and exceeded our second quarter guidance. Gross margin decreased 0.2 percentage points sequentially to 58.6%, primarily due to an unfavorable foreign exchange rate and margin dilution from our overseas fabs, partially balanced by higher capacity utilization and cost improvement efforts. Due to operating leverage, operating margin increased 1.1 percentage points sequentially to 49.6%. Overall, our second quarter EPS was NT$15.36, up 60.7% year-over-year, and ROE was 34.8%. Now, let's move on to revenue by technology. 3-nanometer process technology contributed 24% of wafer revenue, 5-nanometer 36%, 7-nanometer 14%. Advanced technologies, defined as 7-nanometer and below, accounted for 74% of wafer revenue. Moving to revenue by platform: HPC increased 14% quarter-over-quarter to 60%, smartphone increased 7% to 27%, IoT increased 14% to 5%, automotive stayed flat at 5%, and DCE increased 30% to 1%. Moving to the balance sheet: we ended Q2 with cash and marketable securities of NT$2.6 trillion or $90 billion. Current liabilities decreased NT$22 billion quarter-over-quarter mainly due to payment of income tax. Accounts receivable turnover days decreased 5 days to 23 days due to NT dollar appreciation. Days of inventory decreased 7 days to 76 days due to higher N3 and N5 wafer shipments. Regarding cash flow and CapEx: we generated about NT$497 billion in cash from operations, spent NT$297 billion in CapEx, and distributed NT$117 billion for Q3 2024 cash dividend. Taking the unfavorable exchange rate into consideration, cash balance decreased NT$30.3 billion to NT$2.36 trillion at end of quarter. In US dollar terms, Q2 capital expenditures totaled $9.6 billion. I finished my financial summary. Now, let's turn to our current quarter guidance. Based on current business outlook, we expect Q3 revenue between $31.8 billion and $33 billion, which represents an 8% sequential increase or 38% year-over-year increase at the midpoint. Based on exchange rate assumption of 1 USD to 29 NT, gross margin is expected to be between 55.5% and 57.5%, operating margin between 45.5% and 47.5%. In addition, we maintain our 2025 capital budget between $38 billion and $42 billion. This concludes my financial presentation. Now, let me turn to our key messages. I will start by talking about Q2 and Q3 profitability. Compared to Q1, Q2 gross margin slightly decreased by 20 basis points sequentially to 58.6%. This was primarily due to an unfavorable foreign exchange rate and margin dilution from our overseas fabs, partially offset by higher capacity utilization and cost improvement efforts. Compared to Q1, exchange rate of $1 to 32.88 NT, the actual Q2 rate was $1 to 31.05 NT, creating about 220 basis points margin headwind. We also experienced slightly more than 100 basis points impact from the ramp-up of our overseas fabs, mainly from Arizona. We have guided Q3 gross margin to decrease by 210 basis points to 56.5% at midpoint, primarily due to continued unfavorable foreign exchange rate and more pronounced dilution from overseas fabs as we ramp up further in Kumamoto and Arizona. We continue to forecast gross margin dilution from overseas fabs in the next 5 years starting from 2025 to be between 2 to 3% every year in early stages and widen to 3 to 4% in latter stages. Despite higher cost of overseas fabs, we will leverage our increasing size in Arizona and work on operations to improve cost structure. We will also work closely with customers and suppliers. Overall, with our fundamental competitive advantages, we expect TSMC to be the most efficient and cost-effective manufacturer in every region we operate. Now, let me make some comments on foreign exchange rate impact. NT dollar is the reporting currency. Nearly all our revenue is in US dollars, while about 75% of cost of goods sold is in NT. Therefore, fluctuations in exchange rate have sizeable impact. The sensitivity of revenue to USD/NT exchange rate is nearly 100%: every 1% appreciation of NT reduces reported NT revenue by 1%. The sensitivity of gross margin to the same 1% change is about 40 basis points. Compared with Q2 guidance of $1 to 32.5 NT provided on April 17th, the NT dollar appreciated by an average of about 4.4% sequentially, negatively impacting Q2 revenue by about 4.4% in NT and gross margin by about 180 basis points. For Q3, based on current exchange rate of $1 to 29 NT, the average NT dollar will appreciate by another 6.6% sequentially, negatively impacting Q3 revenue by 6.6% in NT and reducing gross margin by about 260 basis points. As a reminder, six factors determine TSMC's profitability: leadership technology development and ramp-up, pricing, capacity utilization, cost reduction, technology mix, and foreign exchange rate, which is not in our control. When the foreign exchange rate is unfavorable, we will focus on the fundamentals of our business and lean on the other five factors. Thus, even with unfavorable foreign exchange rate, we believe a long-term gross margin of 53% and higher remains well achievable. Now, let me turn the microphone over to C.C.
C
C. Wei12:14
Thank you, Wendell. Good afternoon, everyone. First, let me start with our near-term demand outlook. We concluded our second quarter with revenue of $30.1 billion in US dollar, above our guidance in US dollar term, mainly due to continued robust AI and HPC related demand. Moving into the third quarter 2025, we expect our business to be driven by strong demand for our leading edge process technologies. Looking into the second half of 2025, we have not seen any change in our customers' behavior so far. However, we understand there are uncertainties and risk from the potential impact of tariff policies, especially on consumer related and price sensitive end market segments. While we observe rebate programs in China are stimulating some near-term demand upside, we believe this is short-term in nature and continue to expect a mild recovery in overall non-AI end market segments in 2025. Having said that, we believe the demand for semiconductor is very fundamental and will continue to be robust. Recent developments are also positive to AI's long-term demand outlook. The explosive growth in token volume demonstrates increasing AI model usage and adoption, which means more and more computation is needed, leading to more leading AI silicon demand. We also see AI demand continuing to be strong, including rising demand from sovereign AI. Therefore, we now expect our full-year 2025 revenue to increase by around 30% in US dollar term, supported by strong demand for our industry-leading 3-nanometer and 5-nanometer technologies, underpinned by growth in our HPC platform. Amidst the uncertainties, we will remain mindful of potential tariff-related impact and be prudent in our business planning going into H2 2025 and 2026, while continuing to invest for the future mega trend. We are also focused on the fundamentals of our business: technology leadership, manufacturing excellence, and customer trust to further strengthen our competitive position. Next, let me talk about TSMC's global manufacturing footprint update. All our overseas decisions are based on customers' need and the value, some job, graphic flexibility, and necessary level of government support. This is also to maximize the value of our shareholders. With strong collaboration and support from our leading US customers and US federal, state, and city government, we announce our intention to invest a total of $165 billion in advanced semiconductor manufacturing in the United States. This expansion includes plans for six advanced wafer manufacturing fabs in Arizona, two advanced packaging fabs, and a major R&D center to support strong multi-year demand from our customers. Our first fab in Arizona has successfully entered high-volume production in Q4 2024 utilizing N4 process technology with yield comparable to our fab in Taiwan. Construction of our second fab, which will utilize 3-nanometer process technology, is already complete. We are seeing strong interest from our leading US customers and are working on speeding up volume production by several quarters to support their needs. Construction of our third fab, which will utilize 2-nanometer and A16 process technologies, has already begun, and we are looking to speed up production as well based on strong AI-related demand from customers. Our fourth fab will utilize N2 and A16, and our fifth and sixth fabs will use even more advanced technologies. Construction and ramp schedule will be based on customers' need. Our expansion plan will enable TSMC to scale up to a gigafab cluster in Arizona to support leading-edge customers in smartphone, AI, and HPC applications. We also plan to build two new advanced packaging facilities and an R&D center to complete the AI supply chain. After completion, around 30% of our 2-nanometer and more advanced capacity will be located in Arizona, creating an independent leading-edge semiconductor manufacturing cluster in the US. Thus, TSMC will continue to play a critical role in enabling customers' success and maintain a key partner and enabler of the US semiconductor industry. Next, in Japan, thanks to strong support from central, prefecture, and local government, our first specialty fab in Kumamoto has already started volume production in late 2024 with very good yield. Construction of our second specialty fab is scheduled to start later this year subject to local infrastructure readiness. Ramp schedule will be based on customer need and market conditions. In Europe, we have received strong commitment from the European Commission and German federal and city governments and are progressing smoothly with plans to build a specialty fab in Dresden, Germany. The ramp schedule will be based on customer need and market conditions. In Taiwan, with support from the Taiwan government, we plan to build 11 wafer manufacturing fabs and four advanced packaging facilities over the next several years. We are preparing for multiple phases of 2-nanometer fabs in Hsinchu and Kaohsiung Science Park to support strong structural demand from customers. By expanding our global footprint while continuing to invest in Taiwan, TSMC can continue to be the trusted technology and capacity provider of the global IC industry for years to come while delivering profitable growth for shareholders. Now, let me talk about our N2 and A16 status. Our N2 and A16 technologies lead the industry in addressing insatiable demand for energy-efficient computing, and almost all innovators are working with TSMC. We expect the number of new tape-outs for 2-nanometer in the first two years to be higher than both 3-nanometer and 5-nanometer in their first two years, fueled by both smartphone and HPC applications, and deliver full node performance and power benefit with 10-15% speed improvement at same power or 20-30% power improvement at same speed, and more than 15% chip density increase compared with N3E. N2 is well on track for volume production in H2 2025 as scheduled, with a ramp profile similar to N3. We also introduce N2P as an extension of our N2 family, with further performance and power benefits, volume production scheduled for H2 2026. We also introduce A16 featuring our best-in-class super power rail (SPR). Compared with N2P, A16 provides 8-10% speed improvement at same power or 15-20% power improvement at same speed, and additional 7-10% chip density gain. A16 is best suited for specific HPC products. Volume production is on track for H2 2026. We believe N2, N2P, A16, and derivatives will make the N2 family another large and long-lasting node for TSMC. Finally, let me talk about A14 status. Featuring second-generation nanosheet transistor structure, A14 will deliver another full node stride from N2 with performance and power benefits. Compared with N2, A14 will provide 10-15% speed improvement at same power or 20-30% power improvement at same speed, and about 20% chip density gain. Our A14 technology development is on track and progressing well, with device performance and yield on or ahead of schedule. Volume production is scheduled for 2028. We will continue our strategy of continuous enhancement with A14, including a super power rail offering planned for 2029. We believe A14 and its derivatives will further extend our technology leadership position and enable TSMC to capture growth opportunities well into the future. This concludes our key message and thank you for your attention.
J
Jeff Su24:38
Thank you, C.C. This does conclude our prepared statements. So, before we begin the question and answer session, I would like to remind everybody to please limit your questions to two at a time so that we can allow all participants an opportunity to ask their questions. Questions will be taken both from the floor and from the call. Should you wish to raise your question in Chinese, I will translate it to English before management answers your question. For those of you on the call, if you'd like to ask a question, please press star then one on your telephone keypad now. If at any time you'd like to remove yourself from the questioning queue, please press star then two. So now, let's begin the question and answer session. I will take the first few questions from the floor, then we'll flip and alternate to those on the line. Maybe we'll go left, center, and then right sort of a sequence. And we'll start here with Gokul Hariharan from JP Morgan.
G
Gokul Hariharan25:39
Thanks, Jeff. And good afternoon, C.C. and Wendell. First question on demand. I think C.C. you mentioned data center AI demand definitely looks better than maybe three months back. Last quarter you also mentioned core was capacity will probably come into balance by 2026. Is that still our view or you think that the capacity now starts to look tighter? Second, I think you talked about on-device AI as a potential future driver. Are you seeing more development on the on-device AI part? Is it better compared to maybe three, six months back? And lastly, near term your 4Q looks like you're expecting revenue to decline. Is that based on what your customers are telling, especially on the consumer side, or is it just TSMC being cautious and conservative in terms of the guidance?
J
Jeff Su26:35
Okay, Gokul, thank you. Again, for the benefit of those here in person and on the line, please allow me to summarize your questions. So maybe we'll take them one by one. His first question is on the demand, particularly data center and AI related demand. As we have C.C. said in his remarks, it is certainly still even stronger. So his question is about the advanced packaging and CoWoS demand into 2026. How do we see the supply demand gap narrowing or becoming more balanced for CoWoS specifically?
C
C. Wei27:13
Goku, the demand for the AI getting stronger and stronger. If you pay attention to what the four leading companies' CEOs said. And so the macro trend for AI continues to be strong. And so is CoWoS. We are again in a mode to try to narrow the gap. I don't want to use 'balance' because last time you misunderstood what I said. That was bad wording. So I will say we try to narrow the gap. All right. So momentum is still there and very healthy.
J
Jeff Su28:00
Okay. And then the second question or second part is on on-device or edge AI. Gokul wants to know how is the development of customers working on on-device AI compared to maybe three to six months ago. What is the interest or activity level and how do we see this?
C
C. Wei28:19
As I said last time, it takes one to two years for my customers to complete new designs on the product. The momentum is still going. They continue to increase, but the number of units on edge devices is actually mild. However, the die size increase continues. We see the die size increase by about 5 to 10%. That trend continues. So you have to wait around probably 6 months to 1 year to see an explosion.
J
Jeff Su29:08
Okay. And then the final part on the near term. I think Gokul, your question is with our third quarter guidance implies a decline in the fourth quarter. Is there any particular reason or any comment that we want to make about the implied fourth quarter business momentum?
C
C. Wei29:29
I think you misinterpreted Gokul's comment. You are saying we are becoming conservative. Our company is more realistic. We are a company that says what we will achieve and then achieves the high target. So your calculation, I think Charlie also calculated, shows that our fourth quarter is decreasing. We take into consideration the possible impact of tariffs and many other uncertainties. So we become more conservative. That's our current attitude. But I guarantee you with our technology leadership position and excellent manufacturing, if there are any opportunities, we will catch them and expect to achieve our high-end target. Okay.
J
Jeff Su30:42
Okay. Thank you, C.C. Thank you, Gokul. Yeah. Sorry, let's go one by one. Second question and maybe Charlie Chan from Morgan Stanley.
C
Charlie Chan30:55
Thanks for taking my question. Good afternoon, C.C., Wendell, Jeff. First of all, congrats on really strong results and especially on gross margin. Very good execution indeed. So my first question is really also on gross margin because the accumulated FX impact is almost 4.4 percentage points, right? It's too big to ignore. So when TSMC considers its so-called reflecting your value, would you consider this FX impact and are you confident to keep your margin similar to this year's level? I feel that 53% is a low bar. So just wanted to ask if the FX impact can be considered to reflect your value. Thank you.
J
Jeff Su31:47
Okay, so Charlie's first question is on margin and I guess pricing. He notes obviously the big move in exchange rate and therefore big impact to our profitability and gross margin. So his question is looking ahead to 2026, can we reflect or earn our value including the FX impact into the pricing and therefore what is our confidence level on gross margin for next year? Can it keep a similar level as this year?
C
C. Wei32:21
Well, let me assure you that yes, the impact of the exchange rate is huge. But you try to imply whether we are still earning our value. Let me answer that. We are working on it. And we have confidence that the 53% gross margin and higher — I still want you guys to pay more attention to 'and higher.' Okay. Thank you.
C
Charlie Chan32:58
Okay, thanks. Hopefully it will work out well. My second question is a very hot topic recently about the H20 chip shipping to China. I remember three months ago there was another question on this matter. Back then, I believe that chip was suspended. But you were still very confident about your mid-40% CAGR for cloud semi growth in the coming five years. Now China becomes your addressable market again. Do you think that mid-40% CAGR target can be revised up?
J
Jeff Su33:36
Okay. Thank you, Charlie. So Charlie's second question is around AI accelerator demand. He notes that our customer's product H20 recently seems to be able to ship to China versus three months ago it was not. So his question is: our long-term AI accelerator growth CAGR to grow close to mid-40s. Can it be higher? Do we think it will be higher? Is there upside?
C
C. Wei34:07
Charlie, regarding the H20, according to the leading companies' CEOs, we have not received the signal yet. So it's too early to give an estimate. But certainly it is good news, right? China is a big market, and our customer can continue to supply chips to that big market. That is very positive news for them, and in return very positive for TSMC. Whether we are ready to increase our forecast? Not yet. Another quarter will be more appropriate to answer your question.
C
Charlie Chan34:55
Thanks for your comment. It's very helpful. Thanks.
J
Jeff Su34:57
Thank you, Charlie. Okay, then we'll move on to the right side of the room. Bruce from Goldman Sachs.
B
Bruce35:05
Thank you for taking my question. I think Charlie already asked the profitability question. So I'll just move on to your N2 ramp. What revenue contribution can we expect for the N2 ramp next year? I'm a bit surprised to hear that the N2 ramp is similar to N3, given that you have both HPC and smartphone customers ramping at the same stage in the first year or two. Can we expect 15% revenue contribution from N2 next year or a similar level to N3 which was around 10-11% in its second year?
J
Jeff Su35:46
Okay, Bruce's first question is around the N2 ramp. He asks about the ramp profile because we said it is similar to N3. So what does that mean and what revenue contribution do we expect for N2 in 2026?
C
C. Wei36:11
Bruce, you have a good argument. Usually we ramp a new node using smartphones. You knew that. Now it's not only smartphone but also HPC products. However, the ramp profile I just reported says similar to 3-nanometer because it is limited by our capability to build new fabs. Also, it is straightforwardly constrained by capacity. So the ramp profile is similar to N3. But the revenue contribution will certainly be bigger. Because you don't expect N2 to be the same price as N3, right?
B
Bruce37:07
Of course.
C
C. Wei37:08
Good. Thank you.
B
Bruce37:11
If that is okay, should we assume that in '27 the N2 ramp will be faster? Because you take 12-18 months to build new fabs. So you should be able to achieve even higher growth in N2 in '27, right?
J
Jeff Su37:24
So, Bruce is asking if revenue contribution is much higher in '26, should it be even greater in '27?
C
C. Wei37:35
We will answer that question in 2026.
J
Jeff Su37:37
Thank you.
B
Bruce37:38
Okay.
The next question is for N5 and N3. I want to understand the supply demand for N5 and N3 in the coming two years. As almost all AI will migrate to N3 next year, but it seems to me that the N5 conversion is mostly done. We don't see greenfield capacity expansion from N3. So it becomes very tight for N3 in coming years. Does that mean N5 will be lower utilized, or will we build more N3 in the future? Should we expect to sell more value for N3 and N5 next year?
J
Jeff Su38:19
Okay, Bruce's second question is around our N5 and N3. He wants to know the outlook, the supply demand at these two advanced nodes in the coming two years. His observation is that AI products will migrate to N3 and the N5 N3 conversion is mostly done. So his question is:
B
Bruce38:38
3 nanometer supply be very tight the next 3 years? And I think the last part therefore, can we earn our value or price for that tightness? And then on the flip side, what about 5 nanometer? Will it become lower utilization?
C
C. Wei38:55
I like your comment on that we have to share our value because of very tight in N3 capacity. It will be continued for a couple of years. Very tight. And in fact, N5 also very tight. The demand is high because of a lot of AI product still in the 4 nanometer technology node and they will transition to 3 nanometer probably in next 2 years. So, in meanwhile, N5 are still very tight in capacity. N3 even tighter. And so, we are working hard. One of TSMC's advantages is we have gigabyte cluster. And so, we have between N7, N5, N3, even the future N2, we have almost for each node, we have about 85 to 90% common tools. So, it's not free, but it's much easier for TSMC to adjust or convert the capacity between those nodes. And today, let me share with you, we are using the N7 capacity to support N5 because N5 is too tight. And then we are converting N5 to N3 as you just pointed out. We will continue to do that. And so, today our leading edge technology capacity... We define N7 and below are all very tight. And seeing that, we are working very hard to, again, using my sentence, narrow the gap between the demand and the capacity.
J
Jeff Su40:58
Okay, thank you, Bruce. Let's go to the participants online. Well, maybe we'll take two questions from the online and then we'll come back to the floor. Thank you. Operator?
O
Operator41:12
Yes, now asking question, Brad from Arete.
B
Brad41:18
Yeah, thanks very much. I had a question for Wendell on gross margins. And it's always helpful. You've laid a framework for some of the puts and takes to TSMC's gross margins, but my question is really some of these headwinds like FX and the dilution from overseas fabs are more structural cost increases. To what extent can TSMC adjust wafer pricing to neutralize these cost increases in your business? And I guess secondly, on this point, how much economic benefits are you seeing from applying AI across the fabs? I mean, I think Nvidia has mentioned that they're working with TSMC closely strategically in areas like computational lithography to try to drive further fab efficiencies. So, can you maybe just give us some examples where you're seeing real gains in your cost structure? And are we at a point where you're starting to see several points of gross margin benefit from AI efficiencies? Thanks.
J
Jeff Su42:26
All right, Brett. So, Brett's first question is a little bit involved, but looking at our gross margin and profitability, he notes that the unfavorable exchange rate and the dilution from the overseas due to the higher cost, these are structural headwinds. So, his question is can we, how can we or can we earn our value or adjust our wafer price to help offset some of these? And also, how much we've talked about before about using AI ourselves in our operations, how much economic benefit are we deriving from things such as computational lithography with our customers, and are there other examples of using AI where it's helping our cost structure and can we quantify that? The quantify the benefit, sorry. That's your question, right?
B
Brad43:20
That's right. Thanks. Thanks, Jeff.
J
Jeff Su43:22
Okay, Brett. So, first question, gross margin.
W
Wendell Huang43:27
That's the reason why we've been talking about the six factors affecting our profitability. I don't think I need to repeat those six factors. But whenever, for example, using foreign exchange rate as example, a few years ago there were also period of time the foreign exchange rates were against us. So, we are able to lean on the other factors to help us mitigate the negative impact from certain factors and therefore still achieve our gross margin targets. And you specifically asked about ASP of raising the price, but the price is just one of the factors. And I believe CC just elaborated a lot on earning our value. And at the same time, there are other factors that we can leverage on. So, all in all, that's why we're saying 53% and higher gross margin is still achievable. Your second question on AI benefits, I think we also talked about that before. We use that in operation, in manufacturing, we also use that in R&D. And just think about if we're able to produce 1% of productivity gains in a company of our size, that equals to 1 billion US dollars. So, that's the number we can share with you without going into too much other details. Does that answer your question, Brett?
B
Brad45:10
Okay. Yeah. Yeah, that's great. Thanks very much, Wendell. I guess my follow-up question... I guess just digesting your prepared remarks, CC, you mentioned 11 fabs in Taiwan. I think I count eight fabs for overseas that you're planning that aren't commercially online yet. Can you maybe just talk a bit about I mean, I've never seen that type of construct like that type of roadmap before from TSMC. It's quite big. Can you maybe share with us if you're planning a bigger expansion of new capacity next year? And I say this because, in the last few months, we've seen so many gigawatts of data center announcements. I think this week we had one from Meta that was significant. So, the demand looks very strong and I'm just wondering whether you have enough capacity to satisfy demand next year, whether you plan to convert further 5 nanometer to 3 nanometer, and how you see the N2 capacity plans for 2026. Thank you.
J
Jeff Su46:27
Okay, Brett second question he notes that we are building many fabs both in Taiwan and also overseas. He's never seen this size or scale of capacity expansion from TSMC before. So it's very and he also notes that the demand from data centers continues to be very strong. So his question is basically very simply do we have enough capacity to support the strong demand specific to next year and also very specifically to 2 nanometer and will we further also convert more 5 nanometer to 3. That's I think all of his question. Brett.
B
Brad47:08
Thank you.
C
C. Wei47:09
Your observation is right. Recently we saw a lot of announcements of AI data centers all over the world and the demand on 3 nanometer, actually on 5 nanometer, 3 nanometer, and the future 2 nanometer are very high. We did not see this kind of strong demand for a long time. But, will we have enough to support them? I still want to use my word say that we try very hard to narrow the gap between the demand and the supply. We're working very hard.
J
Jeff Su47:55
Okay, thank you Brett. Let's go to the next participant on the call.
O
Operator48:03
Now, it's Arthur Lai from Korea. The line is open now.
A
Arthur Lai48:08
Hi. Thank you, CC Wei and Jazz. Arthur Lai is on the call. Again, congratulations on a strong result. I would like to follow up on the N2. I think as CC highlighted, this is a very exciting node we are all heard. And then, I want to follow up on the return on investment. Can you compare the N2 and N3 return on investment and give us some more color? Second one is, the reason we ask this question is because the capex per area actually N2 is higher, right? And then, we also from industry, the companies' yield on the N2 is also pretty good. So, can you give us some puts and takes on how we think of the N2's future development. Thank you.
J
Jeff Su49:11
Okay. So, Arthur's question, both questions I think are around N2. N2, as you said, is a very exciting node. He wondered who would like to know, understand what is the return or the return on investment that we see from N2 compared to N3. And also, can we talk a little bit into the capex is higher, but the yield is still very good. What is the developments that we're seeing for 2 nanometer? I think that's Is that your question, Arthur?
A
Arthur Lai49:47
Yes. Yes. Yeah. Exactly.
W
Wendell Huang49:52
Okay, Arthur. N2 return, as we said before, N2 profitability is better than N3. Now, there were questions asking how many quarters to catch up with the corporate average before, and N3 took longer. But for N2, we think it will be back to the old days. Having said that, I need to remind everyone that in the old days, we're talking about corporate average of, say, 50% gross margin. Nowadays, we're talking about 53% gross margin. So, it becomes less meaningful to talk about how much time it takes to catch up with corporate nowadays. But, having said that, structurally, N2 does have better profitability than N3. Okay. And N2 development is right on track. We're ramping it in the second half of this year. We expect the revenue to come up in the first half of next year.
J
Jeff Su51:01
Okay. Thank you, Wendell. Thank you, Arthur. Let's come back to the floor. We'll go left middle right. So, maybe Sunny Lin from UBI or
S
Sunny Lin51:19
Good afternoon. Thank you for taking my question. Very good results, and congrats. So, my first question is a follow-up on CapEx. Obviously, full year sales guidance is stronger. You are turning more constructive on high-performance compute and AI. Yet, you are keeping your CapEx guidance. So, is it fair to assume that you are considering some conservatism for CapEx for this year, given the ongoing macro uncertainty? Or is it because in the short term your capacity expansion is somewhat constrained by the ability that you can ramp up more capacity, and therefore maybe in 2026 and 2027 we should expect some acceleration of your capex spending.
J
Jeff Su52:01
Okay, so Sunny's first question is around capex. She notes that we raised our 2025 revenue guidance this year, and we certainly still see a very robust demand from AI, yet we kept our capex guidance in the same range of 38 to 42. So she wants to understand why. Is it because of macro uncertainty? Is it because of constraints in the construction? And her other part of this question is what is the capex outlook for 26 and 27, I guess.
W
Wendell Huang52:35
Okay, Sunny. The capex as we said before, the capex invested in a given year is for the business opportunities in the following years. And as long as there are business opportunities, we will not hesitate to invest. Having said that, nowadays, as CC also said, with all these macro uncertainties, we are mindful of these uncertainties. So we also take that into considerations in our capacity and capex plan. Going forward, it's too early to talk about future years capex, but I can share with you a company of our size, it's unlikely that you see capex dollar amount suddenly drop a lot in any given year. That's all I can share with you.
S
Sunny Lin53:28
Got it. Sounds like capex could be going higher in the coming years. My second question is on cloud AI. And so you seems like earlier attribute most of the sales supply for 2025 to cloud AI. And therefore, I wonder if you have an update on the cloud AI growth in 2025, which you guided before to be about 100% for 2025. And the implication to your core capacity expansion, would you be able to maybe expand a bit more core capacity for this year to support the stronger cloud AI growth for this year? And any other early insights that you could share with us for your core capacity expansion for 2026. Thank you.
J
Jeff Su54:13
Okay, so Sunny's second question is asking about our AI well, she says cloud AI. Basically, our AI accelerator growth in 2025 and related the core capacity. So, her question is what is the AI accelerator revenue growth we expect in 2025? And then what is our core capacity expansion plan for 2025? And she asked a similar question to Charlie or someone earlier, what is the plan for core capacity in 2026?
C
C. Wei54:47
Well, my answer stays the same. We are trying very hard to narrow the gap. For now, you know, for 2026, the demand, the momentum are very healthy and very strong. And so, we are building many new facilities in the back end to increase the AI, increase the core capacity to support our customer. AI demand is very strong. And so, the core capacity, the demand is very strong.
J
Jeff Su55:30
Okay, thank you Sunny. Then we'll move on to Laura Chen from City.
L
Laura Chen55:41
Okay, thank you for taking my question and congrats for the good result and outlook. My question is also about the AI chip. Since you mentioned that AI chip is getting bigger and bigger and also the power consumption is getting much more. So, I'm just wondering that among your advanced technology including the advanced node, we also noted that during the symposium TSMC also announced some of the new technology in advanced packaging as well. So, I'm just wondering how do you prioritize your leading edge advanced packaging? During the symposium, we see that system on wafer, that kind of new design. Do you have any plan or timeline for the new technology? And should we think about that that should be kind of aligned with our most advanced node process like N2 or A16 going forward?
J
Jeff Su56:43
Okay, so Laura's first question is on advanced packaging. Notes AI, the die sizes are increasing, the need for power consumption or energy efficiency is rising. So, she wants to understand how our strategy for advanced packaging along with the advanced node development. Are there any specific packaging solutions that we're prioritizing? What about the timeline and roadmap? How does that match up with our advanced node roadmap? Laura.
C
C. Wei57:12
I think TSMC's philosophy to develop technology is working with customer. The customer has such demand, we develop the technology, we increase the capacity for them. So, priorities, every customer is important to TSMC. And in the advanced packaging side, a lot of customers are using different approaches. So, we are developing a variety of different back end packaging advanced technology for all the customers. Whether it is related to the advanced leading edge technology, the answer is yes. Okay. So, we have system integration. We have CoWoS arrow. That's a terminology. We have a lot of different names that I cannot even remember, but there are a lot of varieties and we work with our customer to meet their demand. That I can answer you.
L
Laura Chen58:28
Is that easy to kind of leverage or transfer different kind of technology from your perspective?
J
Jeff Su58:36
So, Laura's asking how fungible are these different packaging technologies? How interchangeable or easy to transfer the technology between different packaging solutions?
C
C. Wei58:46
Of course, there are some similarities in between. Otherwise, we are going to take too much effort and then not get the return. Yes, there are a lot of similarities, but there are a lot of varieties also.
L
Laura Chen59:02
Okay. Thank you. And my second question is we know that obviously the AI demand advanced node advanced leading edge packaging is very tight. But I'm just wondering that industry-wise we still see probably overcapacity in mature node. Yet TSMC also have more mature 16 nanometer or above that kind of process. So, can we consolidate our mature nodes to make better efficiency and probabilities to enhance the capacity to fulfill the demands across the board? Yeah.
J
Jeff Su59:45
Okay, so Laura's second question is on mature nodes. She notes there is overcapacity on the industry-wide in older nodes. So, she wants to understand for TSMC specifically, if we take, for example, 16 nanometer and older nodes, what is our strategy? Can we consolidate amongst the different nodes? How do we protect our profitability?
C
C. Wei1:00:07
Good question. If you read the newspapers, there is so much mature node capacity. But TSMC's strategy actually is, on the mature node technologies, we develop kind of specialties. For example, that's RF technology or CMOS image sensor or the high voltage. So, we develop the technology at the request of our customer. So, we don't worry too much about what you say, the overcapacity. If it is really overcapacity, we will not build a fab in Japan. We will not build a fab in Germany. So, it's not overcapacity. It's all related to customers' need, customers' demand, and those are all specialty technologies. Did I answer your question?
L
Laura Chen1:01:10
Very clear. Thank you.
J
Jeff Su1:01:11
Okay, thank you, Laura. I think in interest of time we'll go to Brad Lin from Bank of America. Then we'll take one more from the line, and then if there's one more from the floor.
B
Brad Lin1:01:24
Thank you for taking my question. I have two questions. My first one is on the human robot. So, we have learned that human robot started to contribute to TSMC and it is gaining momentum as the next frontier of the AI hardware. How does TSMC evaluate the market size of human robot in the semiconductor and in terms of the potential market time, compute, and also sensor requirements? Thank you. And what do you think that might be another driver potentially for mature nodes, too? Thank you.
J
Jeff Su1:01:57
Okay, thank you, Brad. So, Brad's first question is about humanoid robots. We're starting to see some contribution. He wants to understand how do we evaluate the market size? What is the addressable opportunities for TSMC in the long term at the leading edge and also on the mature nodes with certain type of specialty?
C
C. Wei1:02:21
Brad, it's too early. Actually, it's too early to say the humanoid robot will play a role this year. Next year, probably still too early because it's so complicated. You know that the humanoid robot most of the time will be used... I think the first one will be used in the medical industry to take care of people getting old like me. And you know, I probably someday later I needed some humanoid robot to help me. But, you know, it's very complicated because we are talking about the brain only. Actually, you are talking about a lot of sensor technology. That's the image sensor, the pressure sensor, the temperature sensor, and all the feedback to the CPU. And so, it's very complicated. And since it's dealing with human being directly, it has to be very, very careful. But then, once it starts to fly, it will be a big, big plus. I talked to one of my customers, and he said, 'Sir, the EV car is nothing. The robot will be 10 times of that. I'm waiting for that.' Okay. Did I answer your question?
B
Brad Lin1:03:53
Yes, yes. I believe that the client definitely owns EV cars and robots, too. So, he knows you well. So, my second question would be on the potential pulling ahead of the so-called reflecting the value into 2026. So, we know, well, normally we continue to reflect the value into our pricing. So, given the potentially higher pricing to 2026, are you observing any signs of demand pulling from the customers in the second half of the year? And potentially, given the tight pipeline of N3 and N5, would we see a continuous strength into 4Q, even though we already guided potential decline? But, yeah, any pulling potentially? Thank you.
J
Jeff Su1:04:39
Okay, but second question very specifically, he's asking as CC talked about that we will continue to earn our value, do we see any customers trying to pull in their demand ahead of 2026 into the second half of this year? And do we have any additional comments to offer on the fourth quarter besides what we have already shared?
C
C. Wei1:05:03
Well, the answer is no. We did not see any different customer behaviors so far. But let me share with you, I add more color. If you are talking about the 3 nanometer demand for example, the cycle time itself takes about four months. So there's no way you can pull in anything. I mean, that's a, as I said, our capacity is very, very tight. So we already have all the schedules and so pretty little room for pulling, let me say that. Even if they wanted, but no. Answer is no. So 2026 is 2026, we will share with you. Yeah.
J
Jeff Su1:06:00
Thank you very much. Thank you CC. Thank you Brad. All right, operator, let's go to the we'll take questions from the last person on the line.
O
Operator1:06:12
Yes, the last one to ask question. Mati Hussein from SIG.
M
Mati Hussein1:06:18
Yes, sir. Thanks for taking my question. The first one has to deal with capital intensity. When I look at the past five years when you were ramping N3 and N5, the capital intensity was at or above 40% and you also highlighted how N2 takeout is tracking better than N3 and N5 combined. Does that imply that the capital intensity would need to go back up to 40%? In other words, an initial investment for N2 to accommodate these takeouts. Is that the right way of thinking about how the investment dollars are going to play out in the long run?
J
Jeff Su1:06:58
Okay Mati, sorry we couldn't hear you exactly clearly. Let me try to summarize your question, all right. Which is Mati's question is around capital intensity. He notes that in the past when we invest in new nodes or structural mega trends like we have with N3 and N5, our capital intensity has jumped up to greater than 40%. So, if I heard you correctly, Mehdi, your question is this time we talked about the strong demand for 2 nanometer multi-year upcoming, what is our expectation on capital intensity? Is that correct, Mehdi?
M
Mati Hussein1:07:36
Yeah, that's correct.
J
Jeff Su1:07:37
Okay.
W
Wendell Huang1:07:38
Okay. Mehdi, let me answer this question. As we just said, the capital expenditure invested in any year is for future growth opportunities. So, if we do our job right, the growth in the next few years is likely to exceed the growth in CapEx dollars. Even though as I said, the CapEx dollars is unlikely to drop significantly in every calendar year. So, if you see a higher growth in revenue than the growth in capital expenditure, then you don't have such a high capital intensity. We actually demonstrated that in the past few years. And also, let me just share with you that because of this, we are not setting capital intensity as a goal. It's the dollar amount invested that is really on the structural demand growth in the following years. So, talking about capital intensity is also less meaningful than before.
M
Mati Hussein1:08:48
Thank you.
J
Jeff Su1:08:49
Okay. Thank you.
M
Mati Hussein1:08:49
And a follow-up for me, you highlighted N2P. I'm sorry. You highlighted A16 which will be very applicable to high-performance compute. Is that the node where AI and HPC would actually be at par with a smartphone as an end market that would drive demand for the most leading edge node?
J
Jeff Su1:09:21
Sorry, Madi, again, I apologize. I could not hear you clearly, but I think his question is about A16 where we said it's more for a specific HPC-related offering. So, his question is I think Madi, your question is is that where the AI demand also comes in for the 2 nm family?
M
Mati Hussein1:09:45
Yes.
C
C. Wei1:09:47
I don't know how to answer that because so far AI has been N plus one, N plus two. Is that node A16 and the third node where AI would move to the leading edge?
J
Jeff Su1:10:03
Okay, his question Okay, maybe let me rephrase it. I think I understand better. His question is really about AI adoption of the leading edge node, the N node. You know, we see smartphone, we see HPC. His question very specifically, how do we see the AI adoption of the most leading node for TSMC? He observes in the past it has generally been one node behind. So, how do we see that going forward with things such as A16?
C
C. Wei1:10:32
Well, Madi, you are right. Usually the HPC customer is always one step behind. They're using N plus one or N plus two technologies. Now, because of AI demand is so strong, that's one thing, but the most important thing is they need some kind of performance, but the power consumption is very, very important. And when we talk about A16, we have another power efficiency improvement of close to 20%. That's a big value for all the AI data center applications. So, that helps my customer move faster because every time when we talk about the AI data center, if you notice, the first thing they talk about is power supply, electricity, right? So, they don't tell you that the power efficiency is very important, but they tell you that we have to build a very big electricity power plant to support the AI data center. So, that tells you how important it is. And TSMC's technology, by the way, on A16 is a further improvement of the N2 node. So, it's not a surprise for TSMC to expect for those people in AI data center industry, they want to use A16. Okay.
J
Jeff Su1:12:12
Okay. Thank you, CC. Thank you, Meddy. We'll take the last question from the floor. We have one participant here, Felix Pan from KGI.
F
Felix Pan1:12:22
Hi. Thanks, Jeff. Good afternoon, CC and Wendell. I only have one question about the overseas expansion. I think CC earlier mentioned that the second fab for the N3 there's a strong demand, so you guys need to speed up several quarters for that. Together with I think US government also raised the investment tax credit cap for next year. So, I wonder how this shapes or how this speeds up your ramping schedule for the other, the second fab, and how this impacts the overseas fab dilution for the guidance windows given earlier. Yeah, and I think the follow-up question will be if you guys speed up the US investment, how does that impact to other regional investment like the Japan and Germany as well? And lastly, is it possible to break down the overseas CapEx and domestic CapEx going forward? Yeah, that's all my questions. Thanks.
J
Jeff Su1:13:27
Okay, that's pretty much two questions, but okay. So, Felix's question on our overseas expansion plans, he notes that yes, CC said we're speeding up the schedule for the second fab in the US. Um so, how and he also notes the recent passage of the US ITC bill. So, how does this impact or affect our ramp schedules in our US expansion? And what is the implication or impact to the overseas dilution? That's number one. Well, that's two questions.
C
C. Wei1:14:08
Okay, let me share with you about our ramp up schedule. It's totally because of our customers' demand. And we appreciate the US government increase the ITC from 25% to 35%. We appreciate that. It helps. But the real schedule is because of our customers' demand. So, we have to prepare the capacity to meet the demand. That's the number one consideration.
J
Jeff Su1:14:39
Margin impact.
W
Wendell Huang1:14:41
The margin impact it is positive, although not that significant in the 5-year period. Think about this. The ITC is used to offset the asset value, and the benefit comes when depreciation starts. So, it gets amortized. Okay.
J
Jeff Su1:14:59
And then, Felix's second question is how does the ramp and speed up of the US expansion cluster expansion, how is this impacting our expansion plans in Japan and Europe? If it does at all.
C
C. Wei1:15:14
Well, you think about TSMC expansion overseas. In the US, it's leading edge. In Japan, it's on specialty technology. To be specific, most of the time is for the CMOS image sensor. For Germany, it's automotive industry. So, they are all not in the same field. So, actually, the investment in the US or investment on the leading edge does not affect the investment in Japan or in Germany.
J
Jeff Su1:15:53
Thank you, CC. Thank you, Felix. Okay, everyone. So, this concludes our question and answer session. Before we conclude today's conference, please be advised that the replay of the conference will be accessible within 30 minutes from now. The transcript will become available 24 hours from now, and both are going to be available through TSMC's website at www.tsmc.com. So, thank you very much for joining us today. We hope everyone continues to stay well, and we hope you will join us again next quarter. Goodbye and have a good day. Thank you.