CEOInterviews.AI
Start App
Brad Gerstner
Founder & CEO, Altimeter Capital

CNBC Squawk Box with Brad Gerstner - July 6th, 2026

📅 Jul 06, 2026 Altimeter Capital 23 MIN 7095 VIEWS 29 SEGMENTS · 3 SPEAKERS
Altimeter Capital founder and CEO Brad Gerstner joins CNBC's Squawk Box from the White House on the morning Trump accounts go live, the child investment accounts created by the Invest America Act. He walks through the launch, Gwynne Shotwell's gift of 2 million SpaceX shares, the drive to get corporate America to match, and how gifted stock is treated under the new Treasury rules. The conversation then turns to AI: Alex Karp's criticism of the big model labs, whether AI platforms compete unfairly with their partners, the outlook for AI revenue, IPO timing for Anthropic and OpenAI, and wher...

What Brad Gerstner said

Written from the verified transcript and checked against it. Every figure links to the moment it was said.

Brad Gerstner, founder and CEO of Altimeter Capital and founder of Invest America, discussed the launch of Trump accounts, which began on July 4th, 2026. He said every child born in the U.S. under age two receives $1,000 invested in the S&P 500, and that accounts can grow to $50,000 by age 18 with $10 weekly contributions. Gerstner noted that Gwynne Shotwell donated two million SpaceX shares to two million kids, and that he and Michael Dell were asked by the president to raise $100 billion, with commitments already in the tens of billions. He addressed the debate over gifting shares, saying only gifted shares can remain as shares, while cash must go into index funds. On AI, Gerstner defended OpenAI and Anthropic against claims of overcharging, citing their rapid revenue growth, and predicted Anthropic could reach $100 billion in revenue by year-end. He supported voluntary philanthropic share donations to citizen accounts, contrasting with Bernie Sanders' proposal to take 50% of companies.

Key takeaways

  1. Trump accounts launched July 4, 2026, giving every child under two $1,000 in S&P 500, potentially $50,000 by age 18 with $10 weekly contributions.
  2. Gwynne Shotwell donated two million SpaceX shares to two million kids, held in their accounts for 10-20 years.
  3. Gerstner and Michael Dell were asked to raise $100 billion for Trump accounts, with tens of billions already committed.
  4. Anthropic's revenue could reach $100 billion by end of 2026, driving the AI trade.
  5. Gerstner supports voluntary share donations to citizen accounts, not government seizure of company stakes.

Numbers and commitments

FigureWhat it refers toTypeAt
$100 billion Fundraising target for Trump accounts commitment 14:35
70 million Accounts to be auto-created for kids under 18 commitment 4:38
16.8 million Number of 529 accounts in America metric 4:38
90% Hit rate for corporate participation in Trump accounts metric 2:36
$1.2 trillion Annual AI CapEx investment metric 14:35
$100 billion Potential Anthropic revenue by end of year guidance 14:35

Chapters

  1. 0:00Trump accounts launch and details
  2. 2:36Corporate matching and fundraising
  3. 4:38529 accounts vs Trump accounts
  4. 7:20Gifting shares and Treasury rules
  5. 9:56AI revenue growth and Karp comments
  6. 11:56AI competition and IP concerns
  7. 14:35AI CapEx and revenue outlook
  8. 16:55Anthropic and OpenAI IPO plans
  9. 18:00Share donations and socialism debate
  10. 21:32Frontier model rankings

Questions asked in this interview

6
  1. 2:17I know a whole number of big companies have signed on thus far, but where do you see this going over the next, call it 12 months?
  2. 4:03How should people at home think about that?
  3. 14:11Hey Brad, do you see any end in sight in the growth expectations for AI at this point?
  4. 16:55Where do you stand on what that schedule looks like and the calculus behind it?
  5. 17:52What do you think about Sam Altman's plan to donate effectively 5% of the entire company to the country in some way?
  6. 21:06How do you stack rank the situation?
Andrew 0:00 ↗
Welcome back to Squawk Box. Trump accounts are kicking off on Saturday, July 4th, and our next guest was instrumental in making it happen. Want to bring in Altimeter Capital founder and CEO Brad Gerstner. He is a founder of Invest America. Congratulations to you. I know we've been talking about this for a very, very long time, and it is now official. It is real. And not only is it real, Brad, but one of the major transformations is something you've been working on behind the scenes for the past couple months that led to Gwynne Shotwell's donation over the weekend.
Brad Gerstner 0:32 ↗
Yeah, incredible to be here, Andrew. Thanks for having me. I remember coming on Squawk Box three or four years ago when we first started talking about this. And of course, last July 4th, the president signed the Invest America Act into law as part of the big beautiful bill that created an investment account for every child at birth. Every child gets on their phone a little share of Microsoft and Nvidia, et cetera. That started on Saturday. You can gift into these accounts. Every child forevermore born into this country under the age of two is going to get a thousand dollars invested in the S&P 500 that can compound for their lifetime. If you start with a thousand dollars, as you know, and that is matched, and you add just ten dollars a week, that's fifty thousand dollars for every child at eighteen. This makes real the promise of the American dream, not for some, but for everybody. Every child a shareholder in the upside of America. So, today is a big celebration. We're going to have the first ever joint bell ringing by the Nasdaq and NYSE, and the first ever remote bell ringing from the Oval Office at 9:30 Eastern time. So, it's a great celebration. We've got incredible CEOs from Michael Dell to Ryan McInerney and across the spectrum who've joined the Invest America CEO Council, who are giving huge contributions of their own. And of course, you mentioned Gwynne Shotwell's gift this morning, an extraordinary gift. Two million shares of SpaceX to two million kids that they'll hold in their accounts over the course of the next 10 to 20 years. And when they're 18, they can hold on to the shares of SpaceX or sell those shares. But it shows the flexibility of this platform. This is not a program. This is a platform. It is the largest unlock of direct philanthropy in the history of the country.
Andrew 2:17 ↗
Yeah. One of the things you've been working on, I know tirelessly behind the scenes also, is trying not just to get individuals to donate, but to get companies to match. Where are you in that? I know a whole number of big companies have signed on thus far, but where do you see this going over the next, call it 12 months?
Brad Gerstner 2:36 ↗
Yes. It's incredible, the outpouring of support. I've said many times, America is the most giving country on the planet, and the last year has definitely affirmed my belief in that. The president asked Michael Dell and I to go out and raise a hundred billion dollars for these Trump accounts, and we're well on our way. We already have commitments of tens of billions of dollars into these accounts, and I would say across corporate America, across the Business Roundtable, across the S&P 500, our hit rate must be over 90%. Everybody wants to participate in this. But here's the key. This is not just about the largest companies in America. Take Altimeter. We have 36 employees at Altimeter. We have about 85 kids of those employees, and we're going to donate to every one of those kids' accounts. This is for every small business, every local restaurant, every landscaper, every contractor, every medium-sized business, and every large business. We make it really easy to add money to these accounts. Every account has a QR code associated with it. All you have to do is Apple Pay or use a debit card, and you can transfer money into any of these accounts. And so, we hope that, working with the Small Business Association and many others, that we're going to expand this, and it's already starting to take off among not only the largest companies in America, which of course you know all the incredible names, from Nvidia to Salesforce, from Dell to iHeart, but to all businesses in America.
Andrew 4:03 ↗
Brad, we had Sharon Epperson on the program in the 6:00 hour just talking about how the Trump accounts work, how folks who are watching can potentially contribute. And there was a question I think that was raised about, for a family that's thinking about putting their own money into these accounts, which I think is a big part of this to get the compounding effect of it longer term. Should you put money into this if you only had a choice between this and a 529 account or you're thinking about funding your 401k? How should people at home think about that?
Brad Gerstner 4:38 ↗
Yeah, well, first Andrew, we have about 16.8 million 529 accounts in America, and 90 plus percent of those are with people in the top 10% of income. So, 529 accounts, which is a college savings account, is perfectly good, but the fact of the matter is it does not fulfill the president's Main Street agenda. The Main Street agenda is for the 75% of families that today feel like they're left out and left behind, like the American dream is escaping them. We're going to get every single one of those families into the game. And so, I hope that over the course of the next few months, we're going to be auto-creating with the Social Security Administration 70 million accounts for every kid under the age of 18, so that we can get this money into those accounts and get it compounding. And for moms and dads, here's what I would say to you. We've done lots of studies, all cohorts of Americans want to see their kids do better. If it's $5, if it's 10 bucks, it's as easy as double-clicking Apple Pay on your phone. Most families have this. You can Venmo money into the accounts. We want to make it frictionless for friends and family and parents to contribute a few bucks at a time into these accounts. Every time money hits these accounts, Andrew, it's automatically swept the next day into the S&P 500. So, they will be fully invested in the greatest companies in America, compounding in the upside of America, true direct ownership. This is not a government program. These are individual private accounts for 70 million Americans hopefully over the course of the next few months, where they own the best companies. They own Nvidia and Microsoft and Apple and Walmart, etc. So, we're well on our way. Today's a big celebration, a big milestone. And hopefully we'll see a lot of people get on board.
Andrew 6:24 ↗
One more on Trump accounts, and then we want to get your sense on the markets and AI and everything else. But the thing that you've been working on the past couple months to try to get big investors like Gwynne Shotwell, the president mentioned last week that he thinks potentially Elon Musk could donate SpaceX shares as well into these funds. And then the individual who receives those would hold on to that actual stock itself. I wanted to understand how that happened, and I ask because I know there was a big debate inside the Treasury Department about whether the big beautiful bill technically allowed for it. The language in that bill said that eligible investments were strictly any mutual fund or exchange-traded fund. And the idea, I think, was to make sure that those investments were diversified. There is this other catch-all language, and maybe that's what they're leaning on, but I'm sure you've been reading all that language, and I know there's debate about it. So, I wanted to understand it.
Brad Gerstner 7:20 ↗
Yeah, no. It's a great question. The last thing anybody wants is crony capitalism. We don't want the government picking and choosing stocks, which is why the legislation required that any cash into the accounts automatically swept into the S&P 500. But, the legislature gave broad authority to a whole group of categories, which included gifting. So, only shares gifted into the accounts can remain as shares. Any cash that comes into the account has to be going into those index funds. And so, if you look at the broad exclusionary language, the 529 accounts established, it basically said, 'These have to be treated like 408 A accounts, IRA accounts, except where otherwise determined by the Treasury Secretary.' And the Treasury Secretary, obviously, IRA accounts never contemplated gifts from folks like Michael Dell or Gwynne Shotwell. So, we had to come up with a set of rules. The Treasury Department promulgated those rules. The President tweeted about it last week. I was very happy. I'm telling you, the idea that Warren Buffett could give a share of Berkshire Hathaway to every kid in America, that Elon Musk could give shares of SpaceX, that Sergey Brin could give shares of Google, this idea will unlock transformative philanthropy and get everybody into the game. It's all upside for the kids of America. So, I'm thrilled we're heading down this path.
Andrew 8:40 ↗
Brad, we want to sneak in a quick break before we get into a larger conversation about the markets, about AI. We had Alex Karp on last week, who made some provocative comments. I think the whole Valley has been talking about those over the weekend. So, we will talk to you about that in just a minute. Do not go anywhere. Squawk Box returning from the White House with Brad Gerstner after this.
Welcome back to Squawk Box. We are back with Brad Gerstner of Altimeter Capital, the founder and CEO, also founder of Invest America, and of course, it's a big day for the country and for him given that he's been behind the Trump accounts. Also wanted to get your thoughts, Brad, on where we are in the AI, I don't know if we call it cycle, boom, what you want to describe it as, but I wanted to get your reaction really more than anything to Alex Karp's comments on our air last week, which I know have caused a lot of conversation in the Valley. He said that he believes that a lot of corporate CEOs around the country are upset with some of the big LLMs, Anthropic, OpenAI, thinks they're overcharging, thinks they're stealing from them. And I know you've been an advocate and an investor in these big businesses, so wanted to get your view on it.
Brad Gerstner 9:56 ↗
Well, I'm a huge fan of Alex and I think Alex made some really good points. But I would say this, follow the money. The revenue growth of these companies is the fastest revenue growth we've ever seen in the history of technology. That continues unabated in May, in June, and into July. So if they're really upset with the companies, then I don't think they would be using the products. So two things can be simultaneously true. Alex is right. It's really important that we support open source models in the US. So for those companies that want the choice of open weights and open models and controlling that part of the stack, they're able to do that. But for the vast majority of companies, they want the best. And the best frontier models, the American thoroughbred models, are going to be OpenAI and Anthropic and X with Elon, maybe Gemini in the mix, etc. And so we want the thoroughbreds to run, we want those models to do great. I give huge credit to the White House, Secretary Bessent, Howard Lutnick, etc. When they disabled Fable, we went through a process, we got it back online quickly. We need American models, both open source and closed source, running as fast as we can because the preeminent race is the race with China. We must stay ahead of China for both economic and national security reasons, and I think we found a good balance here. But I don't think it's either or, Andrew, it's both. We need to support American open source models, both the models out of Nvidia, which are terrific. We've got Misha and the team at Reflection that are building some great things, and our closed source models. And I think insofar as Chinese open source models are concerned, we just want to make them play by the same set of rules. We do not want them distilling our models, taking our IP, and then competing against us for free, the way that they dumped steel on the United States. Make everybody play by the same set of rules. I'm confident if we do, that America's models will win, and I think that we're in a pretty good position right now coming out of the recent discussions.
Andrew 11:56 ↗
So, I think part of the question, and by the way, somebody on All-In raised this over the weekend as well, is it's not necessarily fully about whether China steals our IP, which I think is a big question, but whether the models themselves are stealing IP from corporate America. So, the big example is Figma. This is a company that partnered with Anthropic. One of the board members from Anthropic was on the board of Figma, and Anthropic goes into the design world with Claude Design. Just two or three days beforehand, the board member leaves, Anthropic leaves Figma. Figma had no idea, and I think the argument is that companies like Figma that even partner with an Anthropic or others that are partnering, may ultimately lose their business because the large language models will effectively try to take it.
Brad Gerstner 12:50 ↗
Well, again, I think we got to be pretty careful with the verbs and the language that we're using. Did Meta Stories rip off Snapchat? The history of Silicon Valley is replete with examples of competitors copying other products that others have, and then they have to win the game on the field. I've talked to Dylan about this at Figma. If Figma had a choice to make, they can use the model or not use the model. I think some companies will say, 'Listen, we're going to go open source because we don't want to have any interaction with these companies.' But, make no mistake about it. AI platforms are horizontal. They're not going to be confined to a narrow little area of applications. They're going to build their own applications. Remember, when Apple built iOS, they also built a mail app and a calendaring app and a browser app called Safari to compete with Google. They built a lot of apps of their own and I'm certain that OpenAI and Anthropic are going to build some apps of their own. Some of those will be competitive. Some of those will be novel. I don't think that's stealing. I think the history of Silicon Valley is a history of competition like that. I would never want companies that we're invested in to be milking somebody for all their information, getting their product IP and then going out and deploying that. I don't think that's what happened here, but I understand the concern.
Becky 14:11 ↗
Hey Brad, do you see any end in sight in the growth expectations for AI at this point? There's two camps. One that says, 'No, this is here. It's for real and it's going to continue like that.' The other is, 'Look, AI is here, but you may not see the earnings continue to grow in some of these other companies around it.' Explain which camp you're in and why.
Brad Gerstner 14:35 ↗
Yeah, well, the question coming into this year, Becky, and remember, we had two 25% drawdowns in AI data center semiconductor stocks over the last 18 months over this question. Would the AI revenue justify the investment in CapEx, the extraordinary 1.2 trillion-dollar annual investment in CapEx that we're seeing? People came into this year very nervous. In fact, on my podcast, my partner and I, Bill Gurley, were on opposite sides of this debate. I thought that the revenues would show up, but we didn't know. In January this year, we saw Anthropic's revenues with Opus 4.8 beginning to take off and then they went totally parabolic. That lit the fuse on the market with the SOX up 80% this year on the back of that revenue growth out of Anthropic. It's the single most important thing in the market. If you told me 3 months from now all of a sudden Anthropic's revenue or OpenAI's revenue stopped or stopped growing, that would be a real problem, not just for them, for the entire AI trade in the market. I don't see that. I don't expect that to continue. We're still very, very early. In a $125 trillion global economy, if you take 5% of that knowledge work, 5 to 10% of that knowledge work, and you use AI to empower it, make it more productive, that's going to be hundreds and hundreds of billions of dollars in revenue. If you look at the trajectory that Anthropic is on, I think it could be as high as a hundred billion of revenue by the end of the year. There's lots of talk, obviously, about IPOs for both of these companies. And so, I think there's extraordinary growth ahead. I think it's terrific for America, by the way. This is the single most important contributor to the GDP growth of the United States of America this year. It's contributing over 100 basis points of our GDP growth. Very important for us to see this continue. But listen, trust but verify. You got to see those revenues rolling in. They got to continue to build great products. I think there are a couple more models already being trained and in queue. Let's call these the post-mythos models that will be trained starting in September on Vera Rubin. And so, we're going to 10x the amount of compute that we use to train these models. We're going to dramatically improve the chips we use to train these models. We're going to stay ahead of China. And when we do that, we're going to have more and more products that are incredibly useful to both consumers like us, but also to enterprises.

14 more exchanges in this transcript

Sign in free to read the rest of this interview. No card required.

Sign in to read the full transcript

Cite this transcript

APA, MLA, BibTeX
APA

Gerstner, B. (2026, July 6). CNBC Squawk Box with Brad Gerstner - July 6th, 2026 [Interview transcript]. Altimeter Capital. CEOInterviews.AI. https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/1065603/

MLA

Brad Gerstner. "CNBC Squawk Box with Brad Gerstner - July 6th, 2026." Altimeter Capital, 6 Jul. 2026. Transcript, CEOInterviews.AI, https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/1065603/.

BibTeX
@misc{gerstner2026_1065603,
  author       = {Brad Gerstner},
  title        = {CNBC Squawk Box with Brad Gerstner - July 6th, 2026},
  howpublished = {Interview transcript, Altimeter Capital. CEOInterviews.AI},
  year         = {2026},
  month        = {jul},
  url          = {https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/1065603/},
  note         = {Speaker-attributed transcript with timestamps}
}