About Stefan Widing
Stefan Widing, President and CEO of Sandvik, reported record financial results for the second quarter of 2026, describing the period as "a very strong quarter with record revenues and profits." He noted that total order intake grew 17% organically, total revenues increased 23% organically, and adjusted EBITA rose to 8.3 billion Swedish kronor, up from 5.6 billion in the prior year, corresponding to a margin of 22.6%. Widing attributed the performance to strong momentum across key regions and segments, good price realization, and a "superstrong quarter" for mining, where order intake exceeded 20 billion kronor for the first time in a single quarter. He also highlighted that the cutting tools business grew 20%, with an estimated 7% pre-buy effect from customers anticipating further price increases, and that aftermarket parts and services continued to grow at a "very high level."
Widing commented on the broader economic environment, stating that while political and macroeconomic uncertainty persists, the trends Sandvik observes are "underlying positive" and "cautiously positive," with a "slight improvement in the business cycle" driven by general industry, aerospace, defense, and energy. He also discussed Sandvik's strategic expansion into filtration and dewatering solutions for the mining industry through the acquisition of Diemme Filtration, describing it as a move into "a very attractive end-customer niche that grows 15% with good aftermarket and high margins." Widing said the company has a stated strategy of growing in attractive niches downstream in mining and would continue to pursue similar acquisitions.
Source: AI-verified profile updated from Stefan Widing's recent appearances.
Browse all interviews →
Transcript (97 segments)
L
Lister0:00
A warm welcome to Sandvik presentation of the fourth quarter results 2025. My name is Lister, head of investor relations and beside me I have our CEO Stefan Widing and CFO Cecilia Felton. We will start off with the presentation. Stefan and Cecilia will take you through the highlights of the quarter and the remaining time we will spend on the Q&A session. So let's start. The word is yours.
S
Stefan Widing0:30
Thank you. And also from my side of course warm welcome to the fourth quarter report in 2025. If we summarize the quarter we see a strong ending to the year with double digit order intake and revenue growth. We see a strong demand in mining and infrastructure is continuing to improve. There's a mixed demand in cutting tools with strong demand in for example aerospace and defense while automotive remains weak. We also see a strong demand in both software solutions and powder solutions. Total order intake grew by 4% and the organic order intake growth was 15%. Revenue increased totally by 1% and organically by 12%. We also see a stable margin on the significant currency headwinds. Adjusted EBITA came in at just below 6.4 billion corresponding to a margin of 19.6% which is a slight improvement versus last year even though the figures round to the same number. On the rolling 12 months basis the margin is 19.3% up from 19.2% in the year before. The savings in the restructuring programs had a positive bridge effect of 131 million in the quarter and the adjusted profit for the period came in at 4.2 billion up from 4.1. We also had a strong free operating cash flow of 6.77 billion corresponding to cash conversion in the quarter of 110%. A couple of strategic highlights as always. We continue to see strong momentum for digital solutions in mining. In the quarter we booked two large automation orders which were significant. We also see strong growth in our software offering in mine planning and overall digital mining technologies booked good double digit order intake in the quarter and for the full year the business also grew in the double digits. In intelligent manufacturing, our metrology business unit launched a new version of their software where we now include our copilot AI technology also in this software. We also launched a new machining module which is important for us because it means that the metrology software will based on the measurement recommend machining process updates to ensure that the component is more aligned with the intended design. So we start to connect the loop between metrology and machining. Rock processing launched a new jaw crusher platform with significant new automation features, also significant productivity gains and longer service life. And this platform also received Sandvik's internal innovation prize award in 2025 because of the significant improvements in the product. If we look at the market development and we start with the geographical perspective, Europe was up 13% and here cutting tools was up in the mid single digits. North America up 9% with cutting tools up in the high single digits. Asia up 14% and China cutting tools up in the double digits. And then mining markets Africa Middle East up 5%, Australia up 43% and South America up 13% so growth across all geographies. Go to mining as I said we continue to see strong demand basically across the board. General engineering here underlying it's stable but we do see low double digit growth driven then by good double digit growth in China. Europe up low single digits and North America up mid single digits. Infrastructure we see continued improvement in particularly driven by North America but overall on a global scale we still characterize it as a fairly stable development we also see some signs of improvement in Europe. Automotive is a bit weaker overall up in the low single digit. Europe is flat, North America up mid single and China is down high single digit. Aerospace strong up in the double digits and both Europe and North America is up in the double digits while China was down in the double digits primarily driven by timing of orders. In the other segments we are up high single digits. Europe is up high single driven and in particular by defense. North America is up mid single while China is flattish. Summarizing then the order intake and revenues, we book orders in the quarter of 32.7 billion, revenues 32.5 and this is a positive book to bill of 101% which is fairly unusual in the fourth quarter where we typically have strong deliveries of equipment. But thanks to the strong order intake, we still maintain a positive book to bill also this quarter. Looking at this from another angle, we can see the order intake continues to be strong in the solid double digit space. We also see revenues picking up also in the double digits and this is of course a consequence of that we are also now delivering and invoicing mining equipment at a higher level than before showing that we have managed to ramp up production to meet demand in a good way. Adjusted EBIT improved by 1.4% in absolute terms 6.4 billion up from 6.3 last year this corresponds to a margin of 19.6%. And here we see solid leverage on the higher volumes. We also have good price execution and good savings but then offset by the strong currency headwinds. The currency impact came in at almost 1.2 billion negative a dilution of 130 basis points and as you know this is a more adverse headwind than we had guided for when the quarter started. Of course driven by a continued weakness of the US dollar and a continued strengthening of the Swedish krona. Rolling 12 months then a margin of 19.3%. Going first into the mining business we continue to see a strong momentum with strong demand both for our underground and our surface solutions. We see a double digit organic growth across all our equipment divisions as well as parts and services and digital mining technologies. Total order intake increased by 5%. The organic growth was 17% and the growth of equipment was up 39%. Excluding major orders we were growing organically by 12%. The adjusted EBITA came in at just below 3.4 billion sorry 3.8 billion corresponding to a margin of 21.5%. We have good leverage on the higher volumes but it is offset by the very negative currency. The operating leverage was 32% which we are satisfied with in this business. The currency then was negative by over 700 million year on year corresponding to a dilution of 120 basis points. Rock processing here we saw order intake in the mining part of the business declining year on year on tough mining comps. The underlying market demand was robust. We saw solid demand in infrastructure driven in particular by US demolition and recycling as well as for the first time in a long time I would say improvement in aggregates and we also see positive signs in Europe. Total order intake declined by 9% but organically it was a black zero and excluding major orders it was an organic growth of 2%. Adjusted EBITA came in at just below 400 million. This corresponds to a margin of 14.5% slightly down from 14.6%. Operating leverage 41% good savings offset by currency impact almost 100 million negative impact corresponding to a dilution on the margin of 170 basis points. And then machining and intelligent manufacturing of course the last quarter we will present this in this form going forward you will see these two businesses being reported separately. Mixed demand cutting tools strong demand in aerospace and defense as said while demand general engineering improved but it was primarily driven by strong development in Asia and China while automotive remained weak across more or less all the regions. Orders in cutting tools overall increased in the high single digits partly due to low comps for example that Boeing was on strike in the fourth quarter of 24 but also positive contribution from price and tariff surcharge charges. We see a double digit growth in intelligent manufacturing and also in powder solutions and total order intake increased by 5% and the organic increase was 15%. If we look at the start of January, we continue to see a stable development compared to the fourth quarter. If we look at the daily order intake and take normal seasonality into account, the adjusted EBITA came in at 2.4 billion corresponding to a margin of 19.7% which is up from 19.4% in the prior period. We see good price execution, very good savings and also structure supporting margins then partly offset by a negative currency. The savings had a positive effect in the quarter of 103 million. Acquisitions had a dilutive effect of 20 basis points. All currency then had a negative impact of 330 million corresponding to an 80 basis point dilution. With that, I'll hand over to you Cecilia to take us through the details.
C
Cecilia Felton11:42
Thank you Stefan. Hi everyone. Alright, so as usual then let's start with the growth table on the right hand side here. As Stefan mentioned, we had very strong organic growth. Orders grew by 15% and revenues by 12%. Structure was neutral on both orders and revenue while currency had a significant negative impact minus 12% on orders and minus 11% on revenues. All in all though, a total order growth of 4% and a revenue growth of 1%. Adjusted EBITA increased year over year. 6.4 billion corresponding to a resilient margin of 19.6%. Net financial items continued to trend downwards year over year. I will show you a few more details around that in a few minutes. The tax rate excluding items affecting comparability and also on a normalized basis was 24.4%. So within our guided range. Working capital also continued to gradually trend downwards. We ended the year on a 12 month rolling basis at 28.7% so an improvement of 1.2 percentage points compared to last year. Stefan mentioned strong cash flow in the quarter 6.7 billion cash conversion. Returns improved year over year and adjusted EPS grew to 3.38 SEK. If we then continue with the bridge and as usual starting with the organic column you can see that revenues grew by 3.99 billion and that generated an EBIT of 1.2 billion solid leverage of 31% which was accretive to the margin by 1.3 percentage points. Significant currency headwind both in absolute numbers as you can see here and a dilution to the margin of 1.3 percentage points and structure was slightly accretive but all in all resilient margin and good development considering the currency headwind. If we then continue down the P&L looking at the finance net it came down year over year and this is mainly driven by the lower interest net you can see it on the first row here and result of both lower yield cost but also lower borrowed volumes. Reported tax rate came in at 24.5%. Items affecting comparability had a small impact in the quarter so excluding items affecting comparability and also on a normalized basis the tax rate was 24.4%. So within the guided range. As I said working capital continued to trend downwards improvement of 1.2 percentage points on a 12 month rolling basis. So a good achievement this year but also a continued focus area for us across the group. And on the right you can see that the working capital improvement was driven by mining and rock processing. In the bars you can see that it was a strong cash flow quarter as we said 110% cash conversion in the trendline. Conversion 95%. Then look at the year over year development earnings adjusted for non cash was higher, capex was a little bit lower and the positive impact from working capital was also a little bit lower compared to last year but all in all then an increase in free operating cash 6.7 billion. The positive cash flow also resulted in a reduction in financial net debt which came in at 27 billion and in relation to 12 months rolling EBIT we're now at 0.9. Capitalized leases and the pension liability came down a little bit sequentially which resulted then in a net debt 34 billion. Looking at outcome versus guidance, currency as Stefan mentioned came in at 1.22 billion a bit higher than our guidance of 1 billion that was based on the rates at the end of September. Capex for the full year a bit lower than guidance this is partly driven by currency but also timing of some projects and initiatives. The interest net and the normalized tax rate came in in line with guidance. And looking ahead at the first quarter and the full year. If we start with currency here, we expect the significant currency headwind to continue into the first quarter both on topline and also on EBIT. And as you know from a seasonality point of view, Q1 is also typically a low invoicing quarter. Nevertheless, expected negative currency impact of minus 1.4 billion and this is now based on the currency rates as of the 23rd of January. Then if look at full year we estimate capex to come in at between 4 and 4.5 billion. We expect the interest net to continue to trend downwards with a guidance of 0.6 billion and for the tax rate we have left the guidance unchanged. And with that I will hand back over to you Stefan.
S
Stefan Widing18:45
Thank you. So if we go into the conclusion we see a strong financial performance both in the fourth quarter and in 2025 overall. In the fourth quarter we have double digit organic growth in orders and revenue and improved margin and strong cash conversion. For the full year, the organic order intake and revenues increased by 11% and 5% respectively and the margin came in for the full year at 19.3% despite tariffs and significant currency headwinds. We also continue to make good progress in our strategic priority areas. We have a continued good innovation pace and we welcome several new companies into the group. We see strong progress in our digital offerings, strong growth in both intelligent manufacturing and digital mining technologies. And in my view, this has been the strongest year we have had when it comes to the development of our digital businesses both in terms of financial performance and the strategic progress we have made. We also continue to make successful traction in the surface mining business and we see strong growth in important regions in machining such as India and the local premium segment in China. And for us this is not only the last quarter of the year also the last quarter of our five-year strategy period the shift to growth strategy period and if we summarize this period we see a strong and good financial performance throughout the period with strategic progress despite the significant macro and geopolitical challenges that we have managed throughout the period we have strengthened our offerings we have gained traction in important growth areas and introduced many leading solutions. So overall we go now into the new strategic period advancing to 2030 as a stronger group. Thank you. Let's go to Q&A.
L
Lister20:49
Thank you Stefan and Cecilia. Yes, it's time to move on to the Q&A session. So operator please we can take the first question.
O
Operator21:00
We will now begin the question and answer session. Anyone who wishes to ask a question may press star one on the touchtone telephone. You will hear it to confirm that you have entered the queue. If you wish to remove yourself from the question queue, you may press star and two. Participants are requested to use only handsets while asking a question. Anyone who has a question may press star and one at this time. The first question comes from Gustav Schvärin from Handelsbanken. Please go ahead.
G
Gustav Schvärin21:29
Yes. Morning. I have a question on the cutting tool growth. The positive trend you're calling out for general engineering in Asia is that mainly an effect of pre-buys in China on the tungsten prices and secondly given the spike now in price do you have any evidence at all that customers in other markets have been building inventory as well? Thank you.
S
Stefan Widing21:57
On China cutting tools, it's a combination. We see an underlying growth in the demand picture but we also see an effect from pre-buying not because we are raising prices sort of here and now but because of the increased tungsten prices some customers are buying they're increasing their inventory levels basically to because they anticipate some level of price increase. We are not seeing it anywhere else. This dynamic we have seen in China specifically.
G
Gustav Schvärin22:34
Okay, thank you.
L
Lister22:38
The next question comes from Andia from JP Morgan. Please go ahead.
A
Andia22:45
Thank you for taking my questions. I have three please. My first question is just on mining demand so 17% organic growth is obviously a very strong result but could you provide more color on the demand by commodity and whether you're seeing anything incrementally different given where gold and copper prices have got to the start of this year. Thank you.
S
Stefan Widing23:04
I wouldn't say we have seen any specific change throughout sort of the past quarters. Of course, gold and copper are key drivers. They remain above 60% of our total exposure. But of course, we are also seeing many other commodities, silver, palladium, etc. That are strong. So yes, maybe led by gold and copper but a strong demand across the board.
A
Andia23:33
Very helpful. Thank you. And then my second question is just on the margin in mining. So leverage was obviously very strong this quarter, but how should we think about the margin heading into 2026, especially if we expect equipment deliveries to pick up?
S
Stefan Widing23:47
For mining we have a margin corridor of 20 to 22% and we also have a normal leverage of around 30%. So that gives a rough framework of where what we are aiming for in terms of the margin. When it comes to higher equipment growth there you need to look at the incremental leverage of those additional equipment sales. Even if you look at the full margin of equipment versus aftermarket, of course equipment has a lower margin but the incremental margin that we get on additional equipment sales should not be dilutive. And just add to that, I mean this is something we have been talking about for a few years based mainly on comments from others in the industry. If you want proof that what you say is correct then just look at Q4. We had significant increase in equipment deliveries and we see a solid operating leverage. So no negative mix impact.
A
Andia25:00
Perfect. Very helpful. And then my final question is just machining and intelligent manufacturing. So comps were slightly easier in Q4 than Q3 especially in software era. As mentioned can you please explain the moving parts heading into Q1 and is there any easy or tough comps to be aware of? Thank you.
S
Stefan Widing25:18
I think the main thing that impacted sort of from a comp perspective in 24. As I said, there were strikes in the US in particular and then there were maybe a few other segments that were on the weaker side. The fall of 24 was a little bit weaker. It jumped up a little bit in Q1. So sequentially so to say on a daily perspective but that's the only thing I would call out.
A
Andia25:52
Perfect. Thank you very much.
L
Lister25:56
The next question comes from Edward Hose from UBS. Please go ahead.
E
Edward Hose26:01
Hi Stefan and thanks for taking my questions. Um maybe just a couple if I may. So just firstly on the organic drop through in machining and intelligent manufacturing of 28% and clearly a strong drop through. However, my understanding was that when volumes returned in metal cutting we could be looking at a drop through closer to 40 or 50%. Did you maybe just talk through the delta between the two? I mean, is 40 or 50% organic drop through an unrealistic expectation or has tungsten been a headwind achieving that level? Thank you.
S
Stefan Widing26:36
No, we still stick with the assumption that around 40% is a realistic leverage for the machining business long term. Now in this quarter a lot of the growth was driven by price to offset inflation. We have tariff surcharges and so on and have a very high component of the growth driven by price then to mitigate these type of effects then we are protecting our margin we're not expecting an incremental margin of that on that type of growth so that's why it's a little bit lower in the quarter.
E
Edward Hose27:14
Yeah that's very helpful thanks. And then just maybe I mean you might be this but I mean do you have any concerns around the tungsten price? I mean do you see any risks it might pull back this year. I mean, for example, if new supply is brought online, if the pre-buying sort of stops or if China relaxes export restrictions, I mean, what's your kind of base case at the moment into 2026?
S
Stefan Widing27:37
I can start with that. No, but I mean there are many several dynamics driving this. One, as you say, is sort of some type of constraint of supply from China. That is of course possible that it's being reversed quickly and then that can have an impact on the prices. There are other dynamics as well such as the growth in the defense industry which is also driving demand for tungsten and then you have tariffs and so on that comes into the picture as well. So it is a complex picture. Tungsten historically has been volatile. So we are prepared for all sort of eventualities and scenarios. But yeah currently the momentum is positive at least. No, I think you summarize it well.
E
Edward Hose28:32
Great. Thanks. Appreciate it.
L
Lister28:36
The next question comes from Alex Jones from Bank of America. Please go ahead.
A
Alex Jones28:41
Great. Good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. Um two if I can. The first just on the capacity ramp up in mining as you start to deliver more equipment clearly strong revenue growth. Can you give an update on the capacity ramp up and whether you've encountered any bottlenecks or it's all going smoothly so far.
S
Stefan Widing29:00
Yeah, I think it's going well and very happy with the strong deliveries in the quarter which I think is a testament that I mean when we invoice it means we have produced them maybe three to five months earlier and then it takes a while to get them to customers and do local adaptations and so on. This shows that you know while back midyear production levels were starting to ramp up and reach higher levels and then it has now taken a while to get it out to customers and of course now we have a continuous feed of new equipment on its way to customers. We are continuing to do adjustments to the production plans and so on as we speak. But I think the step change has been managed and we can also see it on the lead times that we are managing to keep the lead times under control despite the high order intake which I've said has been a high priority for us because we have seen in prior up cycles that if the lead times become too long you start to lose business on lead time and we have really wanted to minimize the risk of that. Then of course as Cecilia mentioned we have a bit of seasonality in the business as you know with Q1 being typically a little bit lower invoicing simply because you have the southern hemisphere with countries being on holiday in the beginning of the quarter. But yeah, I'm happy with the ramp up and cannot say there are anything I would like us to have done differently or more.
A
Alex Jones30:37
Ok, thank you. And then one just on capital allocation. Could you give us any color or update on sort of the pipeline for bolt-on opportunities in the various areas you outlined as strategic priorities at the capital markets day last year? Thank you.
S
Stefan Widing30:51
I mean if we start with I mean as we have seen here the cash flow is strong and the net debt is coming down. We have always said we wanna be you know...
Maybe slightly below one and that's where we are now. It also means that we have given green light since a while back to most of our divisions to pursue M&A in strategic areas. It takes a while once you have taken a little bit of a pause to get back and sort of make the pipeline active again. But I would say across the areas we did identify we have ongoing conversations, then it's always a matter of right price, right timing. But we have an active pipeline and I would expect more M&A to come in this year than in 24 and 25. Thank you.
O
Operator31:50
The next question comes from CL Bergelin from City. Please go ahead.
C
CL Bergelin31:57
Thank you. How much was pure pricing out of the 8%? Not charter 1.4 but the pure type component.
The push further I think I think that you are 15 to 20% so obviously the cost should grow that pr component should move up even more into the third quarter in the thank you take price first.
S
Stefan Widing32:42
Eh yes, pricing cutting tools detailed breakdown in terms of the specifics. We had slight volume growth and then eh search charges related to tariff and the rest is price but we cannot unfortunately be more specific than that.
C
CL Bergelin33:03
Then it was a little bit difficult to hear you but were you talking about the pricing dynamics coming into 2026?
Yes, on the back of that obviously you have your own mind but you are you're not that self-sufficient right?
S
Stefan Widing33:21
Yeah, I mean okay so I mean Ton prices of course continue have continued to go up, scrap as well, which means there will be a continued price dynamic here on the powder itself. We are adjusting prices on a regular basis basically on a monthly basis depending on the latest APT notation and then when it comes to our other products cutting tools or drill bits and so on, then of course we adjust prices when needed to compensate for the increased raw material cost. But I cannot give more specifics other than that we are. If Ton prices continue up, we will of course have to continue to do price adjustments for that.
C
CL Bergelin34:12
Yeah, my second one and I hope you can hear me is on the demand in Europe. If you look at construction, you're saying that the posting sound but you didn't move the arrow upwards from infrastructure view. And then on if you can comment on general demand through the quarter it feels like a little bit of green shoot but I'm interested to hear across what products and countries that you see development. Thank you.
S
Stefan Widing34:43
Yeah. Are you right on infrastructure? We say there are positive signs but it hasn't really translated into order intake increasing to a level where we put the arrow up. But we are positive, we are seeing a little bit more activity, quoting, stock levels coming down and so on. So it is a positive trend but not yet visible in our order intake in Q4. Of course, Q1 will be important as you know, it's the order where you typically get the orders for the summer season, construction season. So we will have to see in Q1 if we can continue with this trend. For general engineering, in Europe it's stable. I would also say that there is a little bit of positive sentiment in some areas, in particular certain countries where maybe we have seen a little bit more positive development, some of the larger continental European countries, but also here not something we can really claim is visible in the numbers and PMI is hovering around 50, there is still uncertainty. So I would say the jury is still out on a more broad-based recovery.
C
CL Bergelin36:13
Thank you.
S
Stefan Widing36:14
Thank you.
O
Operator36:15
The next question comes from John Kim from Please go ahead.
J
John Kim36:21
Good morning. Thanks for the opportunity. A couple questions if I may. Staying on the topic of visibility and demand. What are you seeing if anything from stimulus programs particularly in Europe were any early signs there?
S
Stefan Widing36:38
No, I wouldn't say. Some of this infrastructure sort of positive sentiment is of course also coming in Germany where there is a big package and even if it hasn't come through yet, it means that some dealers or customers are maybe preparing for higher demand picture. So in that sense indirectly it might impact but otherwise I cannot point to any specific stimulus outcomes unless you count defense into the stimulus package, but that's a different category. In defense we indeed see significantly increased demand.
J
John Kim37:26
Okay, and if we zero in on the SRP division, the comments indicated that you saw some good activity in demolition. I'm wondering if you could give us some color here whether that's for infrastructure or construction related.
S
Stefan Widing37:40
So demolition and recycling for us that's our attachment tools and they go into things like civil construction projects, also infrastructure projects. So it's a mix. We also say we see an improvement in aggregates which is more kind of infrastructure road building and so on. So I would say if you look at the US, we are positive in infrastructure more generically right now. We did get, for a couple of years we haven't really seen dealer orders coming in in anticipation of the summer season but in Q4 we started to get some dealer orders for that which is a good sign. We'll see if it continues into Q1.
J
John Kim38:33
Great, last question if I may. Any color on the capex focus for this year?
S
Stefan Widing38:39
Capex focus. Well, we gave the guidance. Typically for us the largest share of our capex is maintenance replacement capex but then of course we also have expansionary capex built in there and that's mainly for the mining.
J
John Kim39:01
Okay, thank you.
O
Operator39:04
The next question comes from Rism from AC. Please go ahead.
R
Rism39:11
Good morning. It's R from AP. Hopefully you can hear me. My first question is just on the breakdown of order intake in mining between brownfield, greenfield, replacement or cutting it a different way between surface and underground. Something you could comment on.
S
Stefan Widing39:30
Yeah, if we start with the first one, it was pretty similar to prior quarter and also the full year picture meaning brownfield is the majority slightly over 50%, replacements about a third, and then the remaining greenfield. That's been fairly consistent besides certain quarters when we have received a large greenfield order such as the second quarter. But that's a general trend that's been there for a couple of years, which actually means if you look at the growth, it is broad-based growth because everything is growing since the ratio is the same. On underground versus surface, I would say as I mentioned earlier we see solid double-digit growth in all equipment divisions meaning both surface and underground. If you look more specifically, for example the rotary business, I would say we see growth that is higher than the average for our business, but in general surface and underground are equally strong.
R
Rism40:46
Thank you very much. And then my second question, apologies this is quite short term in nature, but just looking at 1Q26, is there any reason to believe that operating leverage in machining is going to be any different from the 28-30% level seen in Q4?
S
Stefan Widing41:06
I mean we cannot say too much but I think the main driver for it being higher than the around 28-30% now would be if we would have a volume recovery and that is of course something we did not give guidance on. We said Q1 started at a stable level compared to Q4.
R
Rism41:30
I understand that's helpful. Thank you. And then just finally from me. Maybe I've misunderstood this but I was given the tungsten price action last year and the wall from the mine that you own. Maybe I've misunderstood this, but I was sort of expecting to see slightly better margins in rock processing. So I was just wondering if I have misunderstood that or if there's any comment you could give around the breakdown of the margin outcome in rock processing. Thank you.
S
Stefan Widing41:58
The Ton prices don't really impact our rock processing business. When we look at the margin development for this year, it's driven by a positive price versus inflation last year with a weak comparable. We had some price pressure in wear parts last year. Then we have good leverage on the higher volumes. We have the positive impact from savings but then a significant currency headwind of 1.7 percentage points. So those are the main components for the margin development for the rock processing.
Tungsten dynamics will be in the machining business. That's where we have it.
R
Rism42:44
That's right. Car, thanks for taking my question.
S
Stefan Widing42:49
Vladare new equipment of that also included. Yeah, I mean we will you will get an updated figure with the annual report but I don't think we give quarterly breakdown per commodity. I look at you Louise.
L
Louise43:32
M eh no I think we can wait.
S
Stefan Widing43:40
What I can say is that of course copper and gold have been a bit stronger than the average that you will see in 2024. But as I also said it is a broad-based demand picture. I mean, we have a good business within silver, palladium and so on as well. So slightly higher than the historic average but not material higher. I think it's a fair reflection that the quarter looks quite similar on a full year basis.
R
Rism44:16
Understood that's very helpful. Also, is there reason why orders from mining customers in rock processing down? Is it a function of commodity mix over there compared to your mining business or something else?
S
Stefan Widing44:31
Now actually the main reason this quarter was high comps. They had some larger orders and a strong demand in Q4 of 24. The underlying demand as we see it is unchanged. Then of course if you compare to our mining business area, they don't have the same dynamics in the sense that their largest commodity exposure is to iron ore where you have a lot of crushing and screening, and iron ore of course is at decent levels but it's not at the gold, copper, silver type dynamics there. And then finally downstream mining has a slightly different cycle than upstream mining. It tends to be a little bit more late cycle. You need to first ramp up production enough to hit your thresholds for the processing plant capacity before you do additional investments there. So it is a little bit of a different dynamic but overall the mining demand in Q4 also for rock processing was robust.
R
Rism45:32
Excellent. My final one would be on cutting tools. You mentioned some prebuying effects in China because of the tariff. Why do you think you are not seeing those effects outside of China? Your customers can see what's happening to tungsten price and can anticipate what will happen to cutting tool prices later on.
S
Stefan Widing45:51
I can start and you can see if you want to add.
C
Cecilia Felton45:56
Of course it's we don't have a straight answer to why we see a different dynamic but one reason is that the pricing dynamics in China is different. In China, the pricing for cutting tools are also more directly linked to the Ton price while in the rest of the world it is sort of embedded into a normal list price. I think the visibility is much higher and also the way they operate is a little bit different as well but it's difficult to say but that would be my speculation.
And maybe also another factor that could have an impact is that we have had price increases in China for a very long time so this is a little bit of a new phenomenon. I think in the rest of the world, Europe, US, we have had price increases for a long time now. So I think that could also feature into the dynamic.
S
Stefan Widing46:59
I think it's a very good comment. I mean, we have many years in China where price increases have been off the table completely. Now also our local competitors which have been operating at very low margins have to raise prices in line with the tungsten increase, which maybe creates a broader market dynamic anticipating this phenomenon.
R
Rism47:28
It's all very helpful. Thank you very much.
O
Operator47:32
The next question comes from Daniela Kosta from Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.
D
Daniela Kosta47:37
Hi, good morning. Thank you for taking my questions. I have two. One is a follow-up on this tungsten debate. When we think about the technology it gets used on, is there any potential substitution? Have you seen that in the past when tungsten prices went up a lot or is it just simply not possible and customers are just going to have to eventually weather the full price increase? That's my first question. I'll ask the second once you answer this.
S
Stefan Widing48:06
There is to my knowledge no substitute unless you go to even more advanced material such as diamond-based materials which is even more expensive.
D
Daniela Kosta48:18
Got it. And then one other thing I guess that we have sort of started to hear about is more and more sort of memory chip shortages. I guess you know throughout your portfolio be it in metrology or in some of the automation that you have on mining. I'm not sure, can you talk through like how significant a user you are of these and whether you see any tightness or how are you prepared for potential tightness there?
S
Stefan Widing48:48
We see no impact from that. Overall we have high mix low volume products in this area. So our volumes are such that we tend to not feel this kind of dynamics since we can always worst case find things on the spot market since our volumes are so low.
D
Daniela Kosta49:09
Got it. Thank you very much.
S
Stefan Widing49:11
Thank you.
O
Operator49:13
The next question comes from Sebastian K from RBC. Please go ahead.
S
Sebastian K49:19
Thank you for taking my question on tungsten. You mentioned about tons of tungsten output per year and I know if your priority is to maintain the margin in the mining business to kind of take a little bit of market share because you can be less aggressive on price increases if price increases as competitors and take a bit more profit. I would just like to understand a little bit more your thinking here.
S
Stefan Widing50:02
I think the last question I think we got last time as well and my answer is the same. I mean this is let's call it the business tactics or business secret. We will not give that away to the audience. So we will manage that tactically as we feel gives the most value to the business.
S
Sebastian K50:26
You mentioned earlier something like flat margin if increasing to increase, you get some operating leverage in the tooling business.
S
Stefan Widing50:44
Yeah. Just because we would have better cost absorption with higher volumes that is what would drive a higher, a more normal leverage of 40% as opposed to the 28-30% we're seeing at the moment. On the mine output, I don't have a ton for you but what we can say is that in terms of the overall production of powder, the mine is roughly or just over 10% of our supply, and then 55% roughly is recycled material from buyback programs and the rest is sourced from other sources.
S
Stefan Widing51:40
Increase capacity obviously. In what areas do bottlenecks specifically on the supply chain? I mean historically we have typically seen bottlenecks with major components such as engines or certain drivetrain components. We worked fairly diligently ahead of that this time so at the moment we can produce as we have planned to produce. No specific bottleneck. We have of course been helped by the fact that we were early out here and secondly that we don't see this type of increase in production in adjacent industries. So we can get what we want for the moment. When it comes to assembly and these kind of things, we can scale fairly straightforward with partners, our own people and also the fact that we have new sites coming online in Asia both in India and Malaysia. So we can produce what we want to produce right now.
S
Sebastian K53:13
Thank you very much.
S
Stefan Widing53:14
Thank you.
O
Operator53:17
The next question comes from Marx from Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.
M
Marx53:23
Thank you and good morning. Just two quick questions from me. Just the first one is on the aftermarket side of mining. I guess we're kind of used to these businesses growing mid to high single digit and you know some people would make the case that given the commodity price backdrop there's a huge amount of incentivisation to get stuff out of the mines by the customers but that's also been happening already. I guess my question is simply from those sort of 8% growth rates that we're seeing now, is it actually possible for the business to grow much faster than that given volume production rates what the customers are doing already or would we think that is a very good growth rate historically and therefore any acceleration or meaningful next step up has to come from the brownfield and greenfield. Thank you.
S
Stefan Widing54:13
I mean we stick to what we have said in terms of long-term growth rate should be high single digits. Now in this quarter and some quarters in 25 we have been in the double digits. And that is maybe a bit of an acceleration driven by commodity prices and the fact that customers want to push even harder. But I think the long-term trend we believe it should be high single digits. And it's driven by a number of factors. Our fleet size continues to grow. That obviously drives aftermarket growth. The fleet is still very old in relation to historic fleet age, that also drives aftermarket. The technology content in each machine we deliver is increasing constantly, which both means you need more service and parts, different types of parts as well, sensors and so on. It also increases our aftermarket capture rate because the more advanced the machine is, the more difficult it is for a third party or local service workshop to do the service. So all of these things are combining into the dynamic that we are seeing this healthy growth in the aftermarket business.
M
Marx55:40
Ok. And maybe just a follow-up. Obviously if you go back a few years there are a lot of discussions around from the investment community about potentially separation of Sandvik into the machining business and the mining business. We continue to see businesses simplify across industrials. I guess your share price and multiple would kind of vindicate your decision for not doing that at Sandvik given it's clearly been a great run for the share price. I guess my question is to what extent do you still discuss this internally and is there any consideration on this debate as to you know it matters where machining is in its cycle and if we get to a more sort of mid-cycle level in demand and margins then that decision comes more back on the table or given where the multiple is versus peers which looks very healthy and looks like there's no major discount, is that discussion really internally kind of off the table for now? Just the latest thinking around that would be helpful. Thank you.
S
Stefan Widing56:44
I mean our approach has always been that you have to have a very long-term perspective. We have obviously explained before how we believe we can be value creative to our shareholders based on the strategy and execution that we have had and we are of course very happy that we feel we have gotten recognition for that in the past 12 months or so. And if the discussion would be there in any way, it would never be around tactics, around share price or cycles or anything like that because if you do it, you do it once and for eternity so to say. So it has to be driven by other fundamental reasons and we believe as we have said that Sandvik is a great group. We have 23 market-leading divisions. And based on the strategy and operational performance, we should be able to create value and we have created value now in the current group structure.
M
Marx57:53
Very clear. Thank you very much.
S
Stefan Widing57:55
Okay, so we have a few minutes left and three in line. So ask you to keep your Qs and A short.
O
Operator58:05
The next question comes from James Moore from Ryenko. Please go ahead.
J
James Moore58:10
Good morning. Thanks for the time. I'll try and make it shorter. Hit cutting tools were high single, machining overall 15 it would suggest 80% for powder and software. I triple digit powder and 20-30 software and I'll give all through at the same time and whatever the tungsten and tariff price impact is for the whole of machining in orders in the fourth quarter, is that the peak or do you expect that impact the percentage contribution to growth to increase going forward? And finally on the mining aftermarket side, you said high single, did you say the number? Did you say if it was seven or eight? And how are rock tools and ground support doing? Are they flat or down? And what's happening there?
S
Stefan Widing59:01
Okay, that was record long but... If we start with the growth in machining, as we said, software is growing double digits now, not in the 20 to 30% range. And if you wait a little bit, you will soon get the broken out intelligent manufacturing restated figures. As you know since we will start report it separately so then you will get the exact figures, but it's below 20% let's say that. I'll jump to your third question on rock tools and ground support. Yes, so if parts and services are growing double and aftermarket is high single, you can see that they are a little bit below. That is I would say normal. All the dynamics I mentioned around the growth dynamic around service and parts, all of them are of course not relevant for rock tools and ground support. They are more purely production driven, so you have a little bit of a lower overall market growth. On tungsten, I'm not sure about that.
I think well it was a question on tungsten and tariff and reaching the peak now in terms of the prebuy impact. I think here some dynamics is that we will start to have these effects also in our comps as from the second quarter onwards. That of course limits the impact when you look at the year-over-year development. But I think in terms of are we at the peak or not is very hard to say. Both how tungsten or APT prices will develop, also with tariffs there were some discussions as you know between US and Europe again just a couple of weeks back additional tariff, so very hard to say how this will develop in 26.
J
James Moore1:01:16
All right, the time is out. The idea was good but we don't manage now to take any more. Calling in us for good questions. Thank you.