Back
Kristo Kaarmann
Co-founder & Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Wise plc

Financial fairness - Kristo Kaarmann, Dan 'Puzz' Aisen & Rebecca Blumenstein

🎥 May 03, 2016 📺 Collision Conference ⏱ 18m 👁 563 views
The need of transparency in finance is becoming unavoidable. Official website : https://collisionconf.com/ Official blog : https://collisionconf.com/news Twitter : @CollisionHQ Facebook : CollisionConf Instagram : @collisionconfhq #CollisionConf
Watch on YouTube

About Kristo Kaarmann

In a 2018 interview, Kristo Kaarmann, co-founder and CEO of TransferWise (now Wise), stated that banks "haven't really treated their users transparently" regarding international payments. He described his personal experience of losing approximately 500 euros on a transfer through HSBC, which he attributed to banks using an exchange rate that adds about 5% on top of the real rate. Kaarmann expressed a desire for more competition in the cross-border payments market, saying he would "recommend them wholeheartedly" if another company could perform some routes better than TransferWise, as he believes "users deserve to have the best option available." Kaarmann also outlined the company's "mission zero," which he defined as the goal of moving money "nearly at zero cost between any two countries and currencies and nearly instantly." He noted that TransferWise does not take positions in foreign exchange or support currency speculation, and that the company remains focused on cross-border transfers rather than domestic services.

Source: AI-verified profile updated from Kristo Kaarmann's recent appearances. Browse all interviews →

Transcript (29 segments)
I
Interviewer0:06
Kristo, thank you for joining me today. I first want to get started by talking about the initial idea for your company. TransferWise is now in 60 countries, but how did this start? I understand there were some frustrations with money exchange from Estonia involved.
K
Kristo Kaarmann0:21
Indeed. So TransferWise is this grassroots phenomenon that started in London about five years ago, and we're now in 60 countries. We're moving about 750 million dollars every month on behalf of people who need to move money internationally. And as we were introduced, the thing that we pride ourselves with is we put about a million dollars back to consumers' pockets every day. So as today finishes, there's a million dollars that the banks didn't get, and it goes back to consumers. But back to your question, how did it all get started? It was a very personal problem. So I realized when I was moving my salary back from London to Estonia to my savings account that, you know, the bank gives you a very different exchange rate to what you're expecting if you look at Bloomberg or Reuters or what the market really does. And I realized that it takes about 500 pounds of every 10,000 that I send. So I was really like pissed off when I saw my money being taken in broad daylight. And then I had a friend who had the exact opposite problem, so we started trading with each other. So I gave him my pounds and he gave me his euros, and we cut out the middleman like this. So both of us save like 500 pounds on each side. So this was the kind of the original solution to the problem. And then 2011 we started TransferWise, which basically industrialized this idea. And you know, from there on it's been so popular we've just had to add countries as we go along.
I
Interviewer1:58
Dan, talk about how you got started. You're featured in the Michael Lewis book Flash Boys. You were at the Royal Bank of Canada, developed a very well-known stock trading platform. What made you want to do something further, to do something on your own?
D
Dan2:14
Got it. So yeah, I worked at Royal Bank of Canada straight out of college. I worked in stock trading, so we built trading algorithms to trade on behalf of institutional investors, so mutual funds, pension funds, hedge funds, family offices, and help them navigate the stock market, trade on all the different exchanges. It's a very fragmented market. So at RBC we kind of put our name on the map where we built some kind of very successful trading strategies. And really kind of our big thing at RBC was it was all about being very, very open and honest and transparent with our customers. RBC is a Canadian bank, has a very good reputation for being nice and honest, and so that's how we kind of got known in the industry. And the idea was, I mean, really all the time at RBC we were always talking about startup ideas and things totally off the wall, not even within finance, but we never really took any of that seriously. But one day we're all kind of talking together about what's going to be the next thing, and we thought about this idea of kind of taking a lot of the same philosophical things we were doing at RBC, using our knowledge of how the stock market works, but trying to do it on a bigger scale. So trying to take those benefits and move them into the exchange space so that our customers could get those benefits no matter where they trade.
I
Interviewer3:28
Now you told me earlier that you actually have nine founders, which seems to be quite a high number, and also that this trying to create a stock exchange is not exactly an idea you had from your garage.
D
Dan3:41
Yeah. So yeah, we started with nine people, five of whom were, you know, very senior people. Eight of the nine came from RBC, so we all worked together at RBC, and there was one very senior person from Nasdaq who joined us, and that was the founding team. So yeah, it wasn't kind of a small effort in the beginning. Basically we all got behind our leader, Brad Katsuyama, who is the main character in Flash Boys. He's just, you know, an unbelievable person, unbelievable leader. And I think he kind of rallied us all behind him. But yeah, like you were saying, starting an exchange is not an easy prospect. The regulatory hurdles just to get off the ground are crazy, in addition to the technology hurdles. Basically when you go live as a stock exchange, the way the regulation works is that you need to see all of the trading activity on all of the other markets in real time so that you know the fair price of a stock at any given moment, so that you can ensure that you're trading in line with the rest of the market. And so you need to be able to consume all this data in real time, process it very, very quickly. On day one we basically need to have the same technology stack that a Nasdaq or New York Stock Exchange has before we trade a single share.
K
Kristo Kaarmann4:49
But I think, Dan, you've proved, and I think what's the most powerful thing that we're now seeing, things like exchanges, you know, those huge mystery things around banks, there's huge mystery, they seem to be those like very difficult things to replicate. Actually they're not. You can start with 9 people in a garage. Yeah, you can start international payments with two people, you can start lending with just a couple of people, but it takes no more than 14 people to start a licensed bank in the U.S. So I think we're now starting to see in the space that actually tech companies can replace, you know, parts of banking or exchanges or trading. And I think the big thing that's changed, so one thing is that, you know, technology has really made a lot of this stuff accessible, but also it's just made information about how the market works so much more accessible. There is a lot more visibility into how things work. And for us, you know, coming from within the industry, I think it really was helpful that we had that knowledge going into this project. But the fact that, yeah, I mean, there's books out there, there's the internet, there's, you know, ways to learn all this. We definitely owe it to, you know, guys like Skype who changed the roaming charges in the past, and Amazon, and hopefully, you know, what we're doing now gives inspiration to the next disruptors.
I
Interviewer6:10
Kristo, can you talk about what you do? You said initially people thought you were crazy. And my question earlier is, well, why don't the big banks just do this? I mean, it seems like a simple proposition. Why don't they turn around and copy what you're doing?
K
Kristo Kaarmann6:25
That's a very good question. So with banks, you know, if they did, you know, we wouldn't have this, so we wouldn't have to build TransferWise to get around hidden fees. But of course, banks have no incentive to tell you what they're charging you if they can get around it, and they have no incentive to charge you less because there's no transparency, there's no competition. So if you look at the problem that we're solving, you know, you're moving money abroad, the bank tells you it costs you $35 wire fee. They don't tell you is you lose 5% on the amount that you move because they give you a different exchange rate. So there's no incentive for them to change. And you know, I wish there was, because then we wouldn't need to do what we do. I cannot really imagine the day where the bank comes out and says, 'Hey dear customers, we have charged you like billions of dollars of hidden fees, now we decide to come out and open, we're not going to do this anymore.' You know, it's 200 billion dollars globally that gets taken from these international transfers.
I
Interviewer7:38
I want to talk about regulation. Obviously there's the promise of new technologies, but in FinTech you run straight into regulatory obstacles. Could you please describe the process that you're going through? You are in the middle of applying to be an exchange in the United States, and your application has been delayed twice. It seems that big banks have all lined up behind you, but there's some very powerful interests that have lined up against you.
D
Dan8:02
Sure. So yeah, so like I was saying, it's a pretty big hurdle just to get off the ground from a technology perspective, but the regulatory side was also quite a hurdle. We started the company in early 2012, and you know, from the very beginning we had this kind of vision that we would try to become a stock exchange. And you know, first you need to get approvals from FINRA, from the SEC, and so we're in that process now. We began socializing with them probably two years ago at this point, and we were supposed to get a decision from them in December, and they asked us to extend it until March, and then in March they still weren't ready, and so they extended themselves until June. And so at this point in June we're expecting to, or I mean we're hoping to find out from the SEC if we can be a full-fledged stock exchange or continue operating as the sort of kind of pseudo stock exchange that we are right now. At this point we're already about 2% of the US stock market, so you know, we're in pretty good shape, we can continue. And the New York Stock Exchange by comparison is about 10%, so you know, we're doing reasonably well. But to make that next leap forward and to be able to kind of extend our services to a broader population, we need to get exchange approval.
I
Interviewer9:03
And could we take a moment, could you describe the coil or the technology that you came up with? It is attempting to basically make the playing field even for individual investors over the exchanges.
D
Dan9:13
Sure. So we haven't really talked about what it does, and our big kind of our big principle is that we want to basically expose and educate the public on the existing practices within the stock market, some practices that we consider unfair, and then try to offer an alternative. And so one of those practices is what happens when the price of a stock is moving. So the prices of stocks move up and down throughout the day all the time, but when it's actually in transition, there's kind of a brief window of opportunity where the price of a stock has changed, but the exchanges and the dark pools and all the different places you can trade a stock, those venues themselves don't actually know that the price has changed, until they're still willing to execute trades at the old prices. So the price of a stock moves up, you know, a very, very fast buyer can come in knowing that it just changed and buy at the old lower price on a platform that's not as fast, it doesn't realize the price of the stock has changed. And so what we do is we delay every single order that comes into our system to make sure that by the time that order hits our system, we have the most up-to-date view of what's happening, and we have a more up-to-date view than whoever initiated that order. So what we do is we coil a cable for about 38 miles, and so every message, everything is electronic, but this message travels this cable for 38 miles just in circles in a loop, and by the time it actually gets to our system, which is a third of a millisecond later, that's enough time to make sure that whatever trades happened elsewhere, whatever quotes changed elsewhere, we've seen that and we can adjust our prices accordingly.
I
Interviewer10:30
Kristo, you say you run into people all the time who say, 'Oh, I don't need your service, I have free banking fees, I use one of the big international banks.' Do people just not have an understanding of the delays, the fees, and the way that exchange rates work? And you've also had to get regulated, speaking of regulators, in every state in the U.S. that you do business in.
K
Kristo Kaarmann10:54
Yes. So this is, you know, this is what makes it really interesting, and I think we have a similar challenge. You know, there's information arbitrage, people who have the information benefit from the people who don't have the information. So regulation in our case is actually useful. So we're dealing with people's money, and we should be regulated, licensed, and we were from the first transaction just to make sure that it's orderly and the baddies don't get access to money and so on. But actually, you know, what we're seeing now, the opportunity with regulation is that you can create a level playing field by injecting transparency into the system. Now imagine if, you know, at the moment you go to HSBC, say, 'You know, I'm the HSBC Premier customer, Premier and transfers are free.' Surely they aren't. The bank's gonna take 4% of your money when they change, right? So let's give it back to you. And of course they won't get back to you, they would put it into bonuses and dividends. But then imagine if that was transparent. So imagine if the bank told you that, yes, you're sending ten thousand dollars, and yes, we charge you a hundred dollar fee. So there's nothing wrong with a free market, you can use a very expensive service if you want to, but I think it has to be transparent, and that's where regulation could come in. It doesn't at the moment, but I think there is an opportunity to create a level playing field with the old obscured industries and the new tech companies that can actually do this much better.
I
Interviewer12:34
There's a lot of talk in the U.S. right now that FinTech has an advantage in the UK and Europe, perhaps not because of less regulation, but more the ease of operating. Would you agree with that? And do you think Dan's experience is perhaps emblematic of that?
K
Kristo Kaarmann12:51
The experience is slightly different, but for us definitely we're seeing something interesting in Europe. They did something clever about ten years ago, which was create a single kind of regulatory licensing environment across the 27 member states. So as soon as you want to start a new product in Europe and you get a license to offer that service, you get access to a 600 million people market like immediately. That's like massive scale, a massive opportunity for scale. Whereas in the U.S., if you're dealing with money, you would normally get what is called a money service business license, which is a state-by-state affair. So your best chance is probably California with, you know, 40 million people. And of course, you know, access to scale in tech companies, this is what makes us special. And today it looks like that special thing exists more in Europe than it does in the States, which is why maybe there are less, you know, financial services businesses coming out of Silicon Valley compared to maybe in New York and Europe.
I
Interviewer13:58
Dan, you're focusing on the U.S. and getting your license before you break abroad in any way, shape, or form?
D
Dan14:06
Yes. So I mean, all of our background, all the founders, we all came from the stock market in the U.S. That's, I mean, I guess at RBC we also worked in Canada as well, so we considered that market off the bat as well. But I mean, the U.S. is just a much bigger market, and we know it a lot better, so we're focused for now.
I
Interviewer14:23
So you both are part of what's being known as FinTech, very different companies. Where is this heading more broadly? Are the FinTech players going to truly disrupt the banks? Right now a lot of the banks are buying up FinTech. There's a sense that, well, maybe the companies are going to get swallowed up and this will all slow down. Where is this going to end?
K
Kristo Kaarmann14:44
So my personal view is that the companies that are being bought by banks are gonna get swallowed up and they won't change the world. I very much doubt that banks of today can be in control of a tech startup and actually, you know, let the revolution emerge.
D
Dan15:07
I think that technology companies are now changing finance in a very meaningful way. I was just saying earlier that I think this movement actually started about 10, 15 years ago with companies like E-Trade, which started taking the old, you know, brokerage businesses online. And then we have PayPal, and we have TransferWise, now we start to get stock exchanges. And I think we're starting to see parts of the industry, parts of the like the universal banking business being done so much better by tech companies that these things are just going to fall off. So the big question is what's going to remain. You know, perhaps everyday banking, you know, using a card and an ATM, maybe that's what banks do well. Maybe that's fine. Maybe we should be using the brands that we have today for, you know, just this simple operation.
K
Kristo Kaarmann16:01
Yeah. So I'll just focus on the stock market because that's my world, and you've already seen a huge amount of improvement in the way stocks trade, just with electronic brokers. I think the main benefits, you know, the natural benefits of technology and scale and things becoming cheaper have already become apparent. But there's still a lot of opacity in the system, or what's happening behind the curtain is still not clear at all. And you know, think about how much better things could be if things were done in an honest and fair and transparent way. And so I do think that the next big step is just having a lot more transparency into what happens behind the scenes.
I
Interviewer16:31
Do you agree that it's speeding up? So think of, you know, 15 years ago brokerages, and then it took like five years for PayPal, and then took another five years for the next thing. I think now it's starting to move much faster.
D
Dan16:44
So I think that is interesting, it's an interesting idea. I'm not sure how much I agree about that in the institutional trading space, because it's just such an, you know, it's still kind of an old boys club, and it's still, yeah.
I
Interviewer16:56
And before we leave, I wanted to be sure to ask you your advice for the entrepreneurs out there, the people who are trying to launch startups. Given your experience, what would be the piece of advice you'd have for them?
K
Kristo Kaarmann17:14
So my, I think the biggest advice is look at what Dan has done and look at what, you know, other companies are doing, and please do recognize that it's actually not that hard. You know, it's possible to solve practical problems even if it's you and your friends. You don't need, usually you don't need immense amounts of capital. You can find ways these days to do it, you know, reasonably cheaply. So you see a problem and you think you have a solution to that, and it's important to see that there is a problem that you're solving. It's not worth doing just things just because it has a slightly better UX. But if you are solving a real problem, you can now see that it can be done, and like really complex things that stock exchanges can be done.
D
Dan18:00
So I would echo that. And then we were having breakfast earlier, and Kristo mentioned that there's really nothing stopping anyone else from going into TransferWise's market, and he would even encourage other firms to do that. And really just the more companies are trying to do the right thing, trying to be transparent, like I would encourage people, you know, everything that you do, just make sure that you're doing something that's genuine and honest and transparent and making the market better or the world better or FinTech better. And don't be afraid about, you know, stopping the competition necessarily. It's just really just about making the whole system better, and that's just better for everyone.
I
Interviewer18:32
Please join me in thanking Kristo and Dan.