Back
C. Wei
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer, TSMC (Taiwan semiconductor manufacturing)

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd ($TSM) Q1 2025 Earnings Call

🎥 Apr 17, 2025 📺 Castify Earnings Call ⏱ 69m 👁 3 views
Good afternoon everyone and welcome to TSMC's first quarter 2025 earnings conference call this is Jeff Sue TSMC's director of ...
Watch on YouTube

About C. Wei

C. Wei, Chairman and CEO of TSMC, has been actively addressing the company's capacity expansion and AI-driven demand in recent earnings calls. In the Q2 2026 call, he announced an additional $100 billion investment in Arizona to build fabs for 2-nanometer and advanced packaging technologies, citing strong multi-year demand from US customers. He stated that the AI mega trend continues to drive robust demand for leading-edge silicon, and that TSMC's conviction in the multi-year AI outlook remains very high. In earlier calls, Wei noted that TSMC's wafer supply, not power consumption, is currently the bottleneck for AI infrastructure, and that he has spent significant time speaking directly with cloud service providers to validate demand before committing to large capital expenditures. Wei has also addressed geopolitical and market uncertainties. In the Q2 2025 call, he said TSMC had not seen changes in customer behavior due to tariff policies but acknowledged risks to consumer-related segments. He reaffirmed that TSMC is not engaged in discussions regarding joint ventures or technology licensing with other companies. Regarding overseas expansion, Wei stated that TSMC is executing its plans in Japan and Europe as scheduled, and that these investments in specialty technology are not competing with leading-edge expansion in the US. He described the current environment as one of "fragmented globalization," where overseas fab costs are higher for all manufacturers, but TSMC aims to remain cost-effective through manufacturing scale and technology leadership.

Source: AI-verified profile updated from C. Wei's recent appearances. Browse all interviews →

Transcript (119 segments)
J
Jeff Su0:00
Good afternoon, everyone, and welcome to TSMC's first quarter 2025 earnings conference call. This is Jeff Su, TSMC's director of investor relations, and your host for today. TSMC is holding our earnings conference call via live audio webcast through the company's website at www.tsmc.com, where you can also download the earnings release materials. If you're joining us through the conference call, your dialed-in lines are in listen-only mode. The format for today's event will be as follows. First, TSMC's senior vice president and CFO, Mr. Wendell Huang, will summarize our operations in the first quarter 2025, followed by our guidance for the second quarter 2025. Afterwards, Mr. Huang and TSMC's chairman and CEO, Dr. C.C. Wei, will jointly provide the company's key messages. Then, we will open the line for questions and answers. As usual, I would like to remind everybody that today's discussions may contain forward-looking statements that are subject to significant risk and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements. Please refer to the safe harbor notice that appears in our press release. And now, I would like to turn the call over to TSMC CFO, Mr. Wendell Huang, for the summary of operations and the current quarter guidance.
W
Wendell Huang1:29
Thank you, Jeff. Good afternoon, everyone. Thank you for joining us today. My presentation will start with financial highlights for the first quarter 2025. After that, I will provide the guidance for the second quarter of 2025. First quarter revenue decreased 3.4% sequentially in NT dollar, or 5.1% in US dollars, as our business was impacted by smartphone seasonality, partially offset by continued growth in AI-related demand. In spite of the January 21st earthquake and several aftershocks, we worked diligently to recover much of the lost production. Thus, our revenue in the first quarter was slightly above the midpoint of our guidance. Gross margin decreased 0.2 percentage points sequentially to 58.8%. Primarily due to the earthquake impact, as well as the start of overseas dilution, partially offset by the cost improvement efforts. Total operating expenses accounted for 10.2% of net revenue. Operating margin decreased 0.5 percentage points sequentially to 48.5%. Overall, our first quarter EPS was 13.94 NT, and ROE was 32.7%. Now, let's move on to revenue by technology. 3-nanometer process technology contributed 22% of wafer revenue in the first quarter, while 5-nanometer and 7-nanometer accounted for 36% and 15% respectively. Advanced technologies, defined as 7-nanometer and below, accounted for 73% of wafer revenue. Moving on to revenue contribution by platform, HPC increased 7% quarter over quarter to account for 59% of our first quarter revenue. Smartphone decreased 22% to account for 28%. IoT decreased 9% to account for 5%. Automotive increased 14% and accounted for 5%. And DCE increased 8% to account for 1%. Moving on to the balance sheet. We ended the first quarter with cash and marketable securities of 2.7 trillion NT or 81 billion US dollars. On the liability side, current liabilities increased by 135 billion NT quarter over quarter. Mainly due to the increase of 111 billion in accrual liabilities and others. The increase in accrual liabilities and others was mainly due to the accrual of income tax payables. On financial ratios, accounts receivable turnover days increased 1 day to 28 days. Days of inventory increased 3 days to 83 days, primarily due to the ramping of new overseas fabs. Regarding cash flow and CapEx, during the first quarter, we generated about 626 billion NT in cash from operations, spent 331 billion in CapEx, and distributed 104 billion for second quarter 2024 cash dividend. In addition, we raised 16 billion NT in cash from bond issuances. Overall, our cash balance increased 267 billion NT to 2.4 trillion at the end of the quarter. In US dollar terms, our first quarter capital expenditures totaled 10.06 billion. I finished my financial summary. Now, let's turn to our current quarter guidance. Based on the current business outlook, we expect our second quarter revenue to be between 28.4 and 29.2 billion US dollars, which represents a 13% sequential increase or a 38% year-over-year increase at the midpoint. Based on the exchange rate assumption of 1 US dollar to 32.5 NT, gross margin is expected to be between 57 and 59%. Operating margin between 47% and 49%. Also, in the second quarter, we will need to accrue the tax on the undistributed earnings retained earnings. As a result, our second quarter tax rate will be around 20%. The tax rate will then fall back to 14% to 15% level in the third and fourth quarter, and the full year tax rate will be between 16% and 17%. This concludes my financial presentation. Now, let me turn to our key messages. I will start by talking about our first quarter 25 and second quarter of 25 profitability. Compared to fourth quarter, our first quarter gross margin slightly decreased by 20 basis points sequentially to 58.8%. This was primarily due to 60 basis points impact from the January 21st earthquake and its aftershocks, as well as the start of dilution from our Kumamoto fab, partially offset by cost improvement efforts. We have just guided our second quarter gross margin to decrease by 80 basis points to 58% at the midpoint, primarily as the margin dilution impact from our Arizona fab starts to kick in. We expect the impact from overseas fab to grow more pronounced throughout the year as we ramp up further in Kumamoto and Arizona and forecast 2 to 3% margin dilution impact for the full year 2025. As we have said before, under today's fragmenting globalization environment, overseas fabs cost are higher for everyone, including TSMC and all other semiconductor manufacturers. With our additional $100 investment plan in Arizona, we forecast a gross margin dilution from the ramp-up of our overseas fabs in the next 5 years to start from 2 to 3% every year in the early stages and widen to 3 to 4% in the latter stages. We will leverage our increasing size in Arizona and work on our operations to improve the cost structure. We will also continue to work closely with our customers and suppliers to manage the impact. Overall, with our fundamental competitive advantages of manufacturing technology leadership and large-scale production base, we expect TSMC to be the most efficient and cost-effective manufacturer in the region that we operate. Thus, even considering our global manufacturing expansion plans, we believe a long-term gross margin of 53% and higher is achievable. Next, let me talk about our 2025 capital budget. At TSMC, a higher level of capital expenditures is always correlated with higher growth opportunities in the following years. We reiterate our 2025 capital budget is expected to be between 38 and 42 billion US dollars as we continue to invest to support customers growth. About 70% of the capital budget will be allocated for advanced process technologies. About 10 to 20% will be spent for specialty technologies and about 10 to 20% will be spent for advanced packaging, testing, mask making and others. Our 2025 CAPEX also includes a small amount related to our recently announced additional 100 billion dollars investment plan to expand our capacity in Arizona. Even as we invest for the future growth with this level of CAPEX spending in 2025, we remain committed to delivering profitable growth to our shareholders. We also remain committed to a sustainable and steadily increasing cash dividend per share on both an annual and quarterly basis. Now, let me turn the microphone over to CC.
C
C. Wei11:01
Thank you, Wendell. Good afternoon, everyone. First, let me start with our near-term demand outlook. But before that, I would like to mention the earthquake during Lunar New Year. On January 21st, Taiwan experienced a 6.4 magnitude earthquake on the Richter scale followed by several significant aftershocks. Although a certain number of wafer in process were impacted and had to be scrapped. We worked tirelessly and were able to recover much of the lost of production, demonstrating the resilience of our operation in Taiwan. I want to recognize and deeply thank all of our employees and our suppliers for their dedication and hard effort over the Lunar New Year holidays. I would also like to extend our great appreciation to our customers for their understanding and support during this time. Now, let me talk about the first quarter's result. We conclude our first quarter with revenue of US 25.5 billion. Our business in the first quarter was impacted by smartphone seasonality, partially offset by continued growth in AI-related demand. Moving into second quarter 2025, we expect our business to be supported by strong growth of our 3-nanometer and 5-nanometer technologies. Looking at the full year of 2025, we expect foundry 2.0 industry growth to be supported by robust AI-related demand and a milder recovery in other end market segments. In January, we had forecast the foundry 2.0 industry to grow 10% year-over-year in 2025, which is consistent with IDC's forecast of 11% year-over-year growth for foundry 2.0. Now, let me talk about the rate the recent tariff. We understand there are uncertainties and risk from the potential impact of tariff policies. However, we have not seen any change in our customers' behavior so far. Therefore, we continue to expect our full-year 2025 revenue to increase by close to mid-20s percent in US dollar term. We might get a better picture in the next few months, and we will continue to closely monitor the potential impact to the end market demand and manage our business prudently. Amidst the uncertainties, we continue to focus on fundamentals of our business, which are technology leadership, manufacturing excellence, and customer trust to further strengthen our competitive position. As such, we are confident TSMC can continue out-perform the foundry 2.0 industry growth in 2025. Now, I will talk about our AI demand outlook. We continue to observe robust AI-related demand from our customers throughout 2025. We reaffirm our revenue from AI accelerators to double in 2025. The AI accelerators we define as AI GPU, AI ASIC, and HBM controllers for AI training and inferencing in the data center. Based on our customers' strong demand, we are also working hard to double our CoWoS capacity in 2025 to support their needs. Recent developments are also positive to AI's long-term demand outlook. In our assessment, the impact from AI reasoning mode models, including deep seek, will drive greater efficiency and help lower the barrier to future AI development. This will lead to wider usage and greater adoption of AI models which all require use of leading edge silicon. Thus, these developments only serve to strengthen our conviction in the long-term growth opportunities from the industry mega trend of 5G, AI, and HPC. To address the structural increase in the long-term market demand profile, TSMC employed a disciplined and robust capacity planning system. This is specially important when we have such high forecasted demand from AI related business. Externally, we work closely with our customers and our customers are customer to plan our capacity. Internally, our planning system involves multiple teams across several functions to assess and evaluate the market demand from both a top-down and bottom-up approach to determine the appropriate capacity to build. Based on our planning framework, we are confident that our revenue growth from AI accelerators will approach a mid-40s percentage CAGR for the next 5-year period starting from 2024. Next, let me talk about the TSMC's additional US $100 billion investment plan to expand in Arizona. All our overseas decisions are based on our customers' need. They value some geographic flexibility and necessary level of government support. This is also to maximize the value for our shareholders. With the strong collaboration and support from our leading US customers and the US federal, state, and city governments, we recently announced our intention to invest an additional US $100 billion in advanced semiconductor manufacturing in the United States. This expansion includes plans for three additional wafer manufacturing fabs, two advanced packaging fabs, and a major R&D center. Combined with our previously announced plan to build three advanced semiconductor manufacturing fab in Arizona, this brings our total investment in the US to US $165 billion to support the strong multi-year demand from our customers. Our first fab in Arizona has already successfully entered high-volume production in 4Q '24 utilizing N4 process technology with a yield comparable to our fab in Taiwan. The construction of our second fab, which will utilize a 3-nanometer process technology, is already complete, and we are working on speeding up the volume production schedule based on the strong AI-related demand from our customers. Our third and fourth fab will utilize N2 and A16 process technologies, and with the expectation of receiving all the necessary permits, are scheduled to begin construction later this year. Our fifth and sixth fabs will use even more advanced technologies. The construction and ramp schedule for these fabs will be based on our customers' demand. We also plan to build two new advanced packaging facilities and establish an R&D center in Arizona to complete the AI supply chain. Our expansion plan will enable TSMC to scale up to a giga fab cluster to support the needs of our leading-edge customers in smartphone, AI, and HPC applications. With this additional US $100 billion investment plan to expand our leading-edge capacity in Arizona, I would also like to mention that TSMC is not engaged in any discussion with other companies regarding any joint venture, technology licensing, or technology transfer and sharing. After completion, around 30% of our 2-nanometer and more advanced capacity will be located in Arizona, creating an independent leading-edge semiconductor manufacturing cluster in the US. It will also create greater economies of scale and help foster a more complete semiconductor supply chain ecosystem in the US. Thus, TSMC will continue to play a critical and integral role in enabling our customers' success while remaining a key partner and enabler of the strength and leadership of the US semiconductor industry. Next, in Japan, thanks to the strong support from the Japan Central prefecture and local government, our first specialty technology fab in Kumamoto has already started volume production in late 2024 with very good yield. The construction of our second specialty fab is scheduled to start at a later this year, subject to the readiness of the local infrastructure. In Europe, we have received strong commitment from the European Commission and the German federal state and city government. We are on track with our plan to build a specialty technology fab in Dresden, Germany. In Taiwan, with support from the Taiwan government, we plan to build 11 wafer manufacturing fab and four advanced packaging facility over the next several years. Volume production of N2 is expected to start in second half 2025. And we are preparing for multiple phases of 2 nanometer fabs in both Hsinchu and the Kaohsiung Science Parks to support the strong structural demand from our customers. By expanding our global footprint through our continuing investment in Taiwan, TSMC can continue to be the trusted technology and capacity provider of the large of the global logic IC industry for years to come while delivering profitable growth for our shareholder. Finally, I will talk about our N2 status and A16 introduction. Our 2 nanometer and A16 technology leads the industry in addressing the insatiable need for energy efficient computing and almost all the innovators are working with us. We expect the number of new tape out for 2 nanometer technology in first 2 years to be higher than both 3 nanometer and 5 nanometer in their first 2 years fueled by both smartphone and HPC applications. N2 will deliver full node performance and power benefits with 10 to 15% speed improvement at the same power or 20 to 30% power improvement at the same speed and more than 15% chip density increase as compared with N3E. N2 is well on track for volume production in second half of 2025 as scheduled with a ramp profile similar to N3. With our strategy of continuous enhancement, we also introduce N2P as an extension of N2 family. N2P features further performance and power benefits on top of N2 and volume production is scheduled for second half 2026. We also introduce A16 featuring super power rail or SPR as a separate offering. Compared with the N2P, A16 provides a further 8 to 10% speed improvement at the same power or 15 to 20% power improvement at the same speed and additional 7 to 10% chip density gain. A16 is best suited for specific HPC products with complex signal route and dense power delivery network. Volume production is scheduled for second half 2026. We believe in N2, N2P, A16 and its derivatives will further extend our technology leadership position and enable TSMC to capture the growth opportunities well into the future. This conclude our key message and thank you for your attention.
J
Jeff Su25:18
Thank you, C.C. This concludes our prepared statements. Before we begin the Q&A session, I would like to remind everybody to please limit your questions to two at a time to allow all the participants an opportunity to ask their questions. Should you wish to raise your question in Chinese, I will translate to English before our management answers your question. For those of you on the call, if you would like to ask a question, please press the star then one on your telephone keypad now. If at any time you'd like to remove yourself from the questioning queue, please press star two. Now, let's begin the Q&A session. Operator, can we please proceed with the first caller on the line?
O
Operator26:02
The first one to ask question, Gokul Hariharan from J.P. Morgan.
G
Gokul Hariharan26:08
Thank you very much. Good afternoon and first of all, thanks for clearing the air on all those JV related news reports. I think a lot of people needed that. Thank you. My first question is on AI demand. So, C.C., there has been a lot of talks about CoWoS order adjustments and some concerns about AI demand. You did speak about CoWoS capacity doubling. Could you talk a little bit about how you see demand versus supply? I think last time we talked about this, you did indicate CoWoS demand is still above supply. Could you talk a little bit about how the situation is looking for CoWoS demand versus supply this year, and maybe a little bit of early color on 2026 also as you plan for the capacity.
J
Jeff Su27:00
All right, thank you, Gokul. For everyone's benefit, let me try to summarize your first question. So, again, Gokul's first question is on the AI-related demand. He notes there's been a lot of noise around CoWoS and order cuts and such. So, he would like to ask CC, what is the thinking or strategy for TSMC CoWoS still doubling this year? Is the demand still exceeding the supply? And how is the CoWoS capacity and supply or supply and demand, I should say, look like going into '26 if CC is able to provide any color?
C
C. Wei27:36
Okay, Gokul. I know there's a lot of rumors about the CoWoS. The last time when we talk about the CoWoS, the demand is almost insane and much, much higher than we can prepare. And now it's a little bit better. I think still we need to build a lot of capacity to meet the demand. As I said, we have to double our CoWoS capacity. Still fully loaded and for 2026, I cannot say the number, but it's still a healthy momentum while we continued. Okay. Did that answer your question?
G
Gokul Hariharan28:23
Do you still think 2026 is going to be supply limited still? That demand is still going to be much more than supply even in 2026. Is that your current expectation, CC?
J
Jeff Su28:35
So, Gokul is asking, then do we still see demand exceeding supply for CoWoS in 2026?
C
C. Wei28:43
Well, we all work very hard to ensure that we don't have this kind of a demand is much much higher than the capacity. We're working very hard and I believe that you will be more balanced next year.
G
Gokul Hariharan29:04
Thank you. My second question is on the US investment and all this and like persistent rumors about involvement in your competitor's operations, etc. You have interacted with the US government, the new administration for the last several months and CC made a big announcement at the White House as well. Just wanted to understand what is TSMC's impression in terms of what is required now that there is also this limited identification going on. What is TSMC's impression of what is required over the next 2-3 years in terms of reshoring of capacity, both from US administration perspective, also from your US customer's perspective. And I also think Wendell also indicated that the margin dilution might be slightly bigger as we go along. So could you talk a little bit about how much of the value can you pass on to the customer as the expansion becomes a little bit more accelerated? Thank you.
J
Jeff Su30:24
Okay, so Gokul's second question is a bit involved, but he's asking about again a lot of talk about our recent announcement for an additional 100 billion expansion in the US. Again, talk about this involving the competitors. CC has been speaking to the US government. There's still potential semiconductor tariff. So, his question is really from TSMC's point of view, what do we think is required for more onshoring in the US? Can we share the perspective from the US government or more directly, what our customers are asking us to do in terms of reshoring? That's the first part. Then the second part will maybe Wendell can address on the margin.
C
C. Wei31:17
Really? Okay. I thought it is a very long question. Let me answer that. Yes, we indeed we have talked with US government officials. And the reason we are spending in Arizona, actually, let me say again, is all because of our customers request. And that because of they have very high demands. I announced it in other occasions say that very strong AI demand from US customers such as Apple, Nvidia, AMD, Qualcomm, and Broadcom. And so that we need to expand our capacity in the US and to support them. We talked with our US government and to ask for their help in getting the necessary permits so we can start the fab. And as a result, I would expect our 2 nanometers capacity around 30% will be in Arizona. And that will be also a independent leading edge semiconductor manufacturing cluster. Okay? And then Gokul, the second part of your question is related to then when Sorry, Wendell had mentioned that the margin may widen. So, Gokul's second part of the question I think was related to pricing. And what is our strategy or approach here as we expand overseas? Is that correct?
G
Gokul Hariharan33:03
Yeah, that's right. Yeah.
J
Jeff Su33:08
Hey Gokul, you're asking about the pricing. As we always said, reflecting our value is a continuous and ongoing process for TSMC as we're in a very capital-intensive business. So, we need to have a very high gross margin to earn the sustainable and healthy return. And that is why we set up our pricing strategy. Geographic manufacturing flexibility is an important part of our value proposition to the customers. We're already discussing this with our major customers and the progress is so far, so good.
G
Gokul Hariharan33:52
Okay, understood. Thank you.
J
Jeff Su33:56
All right, thank you. Operator, can we move on to the next participant, please?
O
Operator34:02
The next to ask question, Bruce Lu from Goldman Sachs. Please ask your questions.
B
Bruce Lu34:08
Okay, thank you for taking my question. I think that geopolitical risk might concern is one of the major uncertainty nowadays. Last 2 days we have like H20 being banned in China, blah blah blah. So, how does that impact to TSMC forecast and production planning? Like, do we have enough other customer and demand to keep our advanced node capacity fully utilized or how does that change our long-term production planning moving forward?
J
Jeff Su34:39
Okay, Bruce. Thank you. Your first question is related he's talking about geopolitical risk or I guess some of the recent rules and announcements specifically the ban on H20. So his question is how does this impact TSMC's business? How does this impact capacity planning and our strategies?
C
C. Wei35:01
Bruce, let me answer this question. Of course, we do not comment on specific customers or product. But let me assure you that we have taken this into consideration when providing our 4-year growth outlook. Did I answer the question?
B
Bruce Lu35:27
Yes, but I want a little bit more about like, you know, I'm sure you guys did a lot of sensitivity analysis like what kind of impact is going to be or can you share with us like how much buffer we got that you have assumed like how comfortable we have to maintain our current capacity planning moving forward or current utilization right now.
J
Jeff Su35:52
Okay, so Bruce is asking for some more color in terms of what type of buffer or what type of room we have in making our decisions for the long-term capacity planning.
C
C. Wei36:06
Well, actually we know a lot of people right now speculate a lot of things. But again, we certainly we are mindful of the potential impact from all the recent tariff announcement, especially the potential impact to the end market demand. We will continue to watch it carefully. Having said that, we have not seen any change in our customers' behavior so far.
And so, we stick on our forecast.
B
Bruce Lu36:45
I see. Thank you. Let me switch gear to a little bit for the non-US capacity expansion. I think yes, as we understand that the current capacity utilization for mature node is underutilized, right? You know, do we consider to slow down the capacity expansion in Japan or Europe or just relocate the current equipment from Taiwan to Japan or Europe instead of building the new one? You know, we don't want to. Why do we want to expand the capacity for the mature node, which management already mentioned that it's an oversupply industry, though. You know, if we relocate, then we can squeeze more space, clean room in Taiwan for more advanced node.
J
Jeff Su37:30
Okay, so Bruce's second question is around mature node and our expansion into Europe and Japan. His question really is, given that the capacity of mature node in 7 nm are underutilized, number one, are we considering to slow down our expansions in these places? And then number two, would we consider using current equipment to relocate from Taiwan to overseas rather than just the pure new expansion or greenfield expansion? Bruce?
C
C. Wei38:01
Let me answer the first part of the question. Are we considering slowing down? The answer is no. We are executing our plan as scheduled. The reason is very simple, because this kind of mature node is a specialty. Technology is a demand which my competitor did not have the capacity or the capability to support. So, it's kind of a free form. You mentioned the under-loading of the mature node. And so, again, I would emphasize, no, we are not going to slow down our plan in Japan or in Germany. The second question is how to do it? You have a good idea, but it's TSMC's confidential information. I'll let you know later.
B
Bruce Lu39:10
Okay. Thank you.
J
Jeff Su39:11
All right. Thanks, Bruce. Operator, can we move on to the next participant, please?
O
Operator39:18
Now, the line is open to Charlie Chan, Morgan Stanley.
C
Charlie Chan39:23
Hi. Good afternoon, gentlemen. Thanks for taking my question. So, my first question is really very specific on the semiconductor tariff on either Taiwan or TSMC's leading edge. So, I'm wondering, first of all, does TSMC get involved in all those tariff negotiations between Taiwan government and the US government? And secondly, do you believe that your commitment of a 165 billion US R&D investments can get a pass on these semiconductor tariff? Because in your previous comment, it seems to only concern about the tariff impact on consumer tech demand. But I think global investors are also very concerned about additional tariff on these semiconductor category. Can you give us some color? Thank you.
J
Jeff Su40:20
Okay, let me summarize your question, first question, Charlie. So, Charlie's first question is on semiconductor tariffs. He wants to know what is our comment or view on potential tariffs on Taiwan reciprocal tariffs or semiconductor specific tariffs. His question specifically is TSMC get involved in the negotiations between the Taiwan government and the US government.
C
C. Wei40:46
Charlie, this kind of tariff discussion is between countries. We are a private company. Certainly, no, we are not getting involved.
What is the second question?
C
Charlie Chan41:01
Okay. Yeah, so actually do you have any visibility that the semiconductor specific tariff can be exempt?
J
Jeff Su41:16
So, Charlie is saying that. Sorry, Charlie, I think your question was with our total investment of 165 billion US dollars in Arizona, do we believe does TSMC believe semiconductors will be exempt from these tariffs?
C
Charlie Chan41:35
Yes. Yes.
C
C. Wei41:37
Charlie, all policy, especially this tariff decision, are governments responsibility to decide. And as a private company, we are fully respectable of this. But we are not getting involved.
C
Charlie Chan41:57
Okay, that's your I think you're too moderate, but let's move on to my second question. So, based on your second quarter guidance, which is very strong of 13% Q on Q, I can't help to think that whether there are customers pulling given a tariff or is there kind of really demand? And also based on your full year guidance of mid-20%, it seems like second half recovery will be very very gradual or flattish. So I'm wondering if you already baking in the kind of consumer tech demand impact. And if a tariff have a some kind of turnaround, right? Meaning some extension on for example, major smartphone brands, whether there's a chance for you to revise up your full year revenue guidance. Thank you.
J
Jeff Su42:57
Okay, so Charlie's second question is on the revenue outlook. His first part is on the second quarter. He notes second quarter 13% at the midpoint in US dollar terms Q on Q is very strong. So he wonders is this are we seeing already some tariff pulling impact or this part of that guidance? I'll stop here first.
C
C. Wei43:18
Yeah, Charlie, we have as we said in the prepared remarks, we haven't seen any changes in customers' behavior so far. Our second quarter growth is driven mainly by strong demand for the 3 nanometer and 5 nanometer technologies underpinned by the growth in our HPC platform. As I said, we haven't seen any observe any changes in customer behavior in terms of pulling or due to tariffs. You're probably better to ask them directly.
J
Jeff Su43:55
And the second part then Charlie is asking about what the second quarter guidance implies, you know, limited half on half growth. So is that also because we are assuming something from tariff impact to consumer demand or why is that?
C
C. Wei44:11
I Charlie as we also said in the prepared remarks, there are uncertainties and potential risks from tariffs exist. So far that's what we are able to share with you is we stick to the mid 20 or close to mid 20% year-over-year growth no different from the previous quarter.
C
Charlie Chan44:39
I see. So so yeah, so I think there's really what do I but I think your answer to Coco's the previous question on long-term margin dilution was a little bit unclear because we thought that that 2 to 3% margin dilution from overseas tariff should remain to be the case but it seems like it's a widening. So, I'm not sure if you because you're further accelerating your US fab expansion or some cost item or pricing item are not in your expectations versus maybe one or two months ago.
J
Jeff Su45:18
Okay, I think so. Charlie is asking basically how come the dilution in the latter period widens to 3 to 4%? What are the drivers or reasons behind it?
C
C. Wei45:29
Yeah, Charlie the widening of dilution on the gross margin in the later part of the five-year period is mainly from inflation in cost and also potential tariff related cost increases. Those are the reasons.
C
Charlie Chan45:49
Mhm.
J
Jeff Su45:50
Okay.
C
Charlie Chan45:51
Oh, I see. Okay, thank you.
J
Jeff Su45:52
Okay, thank you, Charlie. Okay, operator, let's move on to the next participant, please.
O
Operator46:00
Next one, Charles Shi from Nikkei. Go ahead, please.
C
Charles Shi46:07
Thanks for taking my questions. Maybe I'll ask a relatively higher level question. It's a two-part question. Both are regarding your expansion plan in the United States. I think management in another occasion said what TSMC wants the most is really fairness. Nothing monetary, nothing about tariffs, but fairness. Can management kind of elaborate a little bit what fairness means? Give us a little bit more specifics. But the other part of the question regarding the US expansion is about the R&D team center. You announced that we understand yes that TSMC's R&D in the US does need to start from somewhere, right? You said it's more about the production improvements related R&D on derivative nodes. But since this seems to be something the US really cares about that the R&D capability on the US soil on the leading edge, is there any longer-term plan to have the US R&D center to be involved let's say in the primary R&D, let's say brand new processes at the major nodes at development? That's my two-part question. Thank you.
J
Jeff Su47:36
All right, thank you, Charles. So again, to summarize, both questions are related to the expansion in the US. So first part of the question is we, you know, CC has mentioned all we want is fair treatment. So what do we mean by fair or fairness?
C
C. Wei47:52
Well, let me answer this question. What we mean by fair treatment is very simple. If anybody gets the subsidy or gets incentive, it should be everybody should get the same. Either we got all or we got zero, all right? So, that's what we call fair. So, again, I would like to assure you that we will be very competitive in either conditions.
J
Jeff Su48:25
Okay. And then the second part of the question is regarding the R&D. Charles is saying he understands the R&D needs to start from somewhere, but you know, with our major R&D center in Arizona, what will be the purpose or the focus, and will it be involved at some point in ramping new technologies?
C
C. Wei48:46
Well, as I said before, TSMC's fab, you know, never be state-of-the-art. We always continue to improve it. And we need to establish a major R&D center in Arizona, with about 1,000 engineers. That's a big amount. But the focus will be to support our manufacturing cluster, improve its technology, and allow it to operate independently. Okay. Did I answer the question?
C
Charles Shi49:25
Maybe let me just really follow up because there has been a good amount of chatters about the US R&D center more supporting manufacturing rather than doing brand new nodes, but looks like that's not the plan, but over the longer term, is there any thoughts of management maybe they will get involved in brand new nodes and development one way or the other? I think that's the question people have been discussing about over the last quarter.
J
Jeff Su50:02
Okay, so Charles, so where? Charles is asking, will the R&D center over the mid to long term also focus on things like new node development or pathfinding opportunities, long-term research, these type of things?
C
C. Wei50:16
Okay, actually the first purpose is to let the Arizona Sapphire can operate independently, but of course, we have done and we are doing it right now or do some kind of pathfinding, exploratory work, and cooperate with university, etc., you know, it actually a lot of activities. 1,000 engineer is not a small amount. Of course, it's not comparable to TSMC's. Right now, it's a 10,000 R&D people, but it's a beginning. Okay? So, we do a lot more.
J
Jeff Su51:04
Okay, Charles, do you have a second question?
C
Charles Shi51:06
Yes, yes, yes.
J
Jeff Su51:07
Yeah.
C
Charles Shi51:09
No, I don't. Thank you.
J
Jeff Su51:11
Okay, great. Thank you. Operator, the next participant, please.
O
Operator51:17
Next one to ask question, Sunny Lin from UBS.
S
Sunny Lin51:22
Good afternoon. Thank you very much for taking my questions. So, my first question is to follow up on the Arizona expansions. So, first part is on the timeline or the pace of your expansions. Now, given the stronger demand for your US capacities, to what extent could you pull in the rest of the original second and third phase? And for your first fourth phase, you earlier mentioned that you'll be constructing the facial data this year. So, would that really be possible that you start to run the fourth phase at the same time as the third phase?
J
Jeff Su52:00
Okay, so Sunny's first question is regarding our Gigafab cluster in Arizona. She wants to understand the timeline of expansion, particularly given the strong AI-related demand. Can we pull in the timing for both the second fab and the third fab? And also, can we, at the same time, start the production of the third and fourth fab simultaneously?
C
C. Wei52:27
Well, Sunny, we are working very hard to speed it up of our production in the second fab and the construction of the third fab. All I can say now is, customer's demand is strong. We have to really do speed it up. And the following all the fab will definitely will depend on our customer's demand, of course.
J
Jeff Su53:01
Okay, Sunny.
S
Sunny Lin53:04
What, so, sorry, just to clarify. So, the second phase originally is planning for production in 2028. So, now should we assume it to be from maybe mid-2027 or even first half of 2027? And for the third phase, since you are building the facial this year, so will the production start maybe 1 year ahead versus the original timeline of 2030?
J
Jeff Su53:30
Okay, so, Sunny's specifically, so, the second one we said we're speeding up. Can we give some context of a timeframe? And then for the third fab, will we also speed it up? Could that also be moved forward?
C
C. Wei53:46
Okay, yes, we are speeding it up. How fast? The second fab, as you said, it should be pulling. And this one we are working hard to pull in at least a couple of quarters. That's at least. On the third fab, actually, I did not speak the whole thing. It's also being constrained by the labor shortage over Arizona, and we need to get all the permits, everything, etc. So, I cannot give you a very definite date yet, but we are going to update you probably in the next quarter or one quarter after that.
S
Sunny Lin54:41
Got it. No problem. My second question is on the pricing and margin of the overseas expansions. And so now with the especially stronger demand for the US capacities, would you be able to sell more value given the stronger onshoring requirements? And then for margin, earlier you mentioned the 2 to 3% margin dilutions for the coming 2 to 3 years, and then expanding to 3 to 4% maybe into 2029 to 2030. I just wonder what's the underlying wafer price assumption for that gross margin dilution estimate. If you are able to raise the AZ pricing a bit, would the gross margin dilution could be less?
J
Jeff Su55:28
Okay, so Sunny's question is on the overseas expansion in both pricing and margin given the strong demand. In terms of pricing, can we reflect even greater value to our customers? And therefore, and also her question is given that the dilution from overseas will widen to 3 to 4% in the latter stages of the 5-year period, she wants to know what is our underlying wafer price assumption behind this.
C
C. Wei55:59
Sunny, let me answer that. These two things are actually go together. As we said, reflecting our value is a continuous and ongoing process. And we because of our business nature, we need very high gross margin to earn a sustainable healthy return. Now, geographic manufacturing flexibility is an important part of our value proposition to the customers. Therefore, we are already discussing this with our major customers. And the progress is so far, so good. Okay? Now, at the same time, the margin dilution from the overseas fabs, the additional dilutions come from the cost inflation, as well as potential cost increases from the tariff policies. Of course, with that, we also want to reflect the value, and therefore the discussion with the customers are in continuous. Okay, Sunny?
S
Sunny Lin57:12
Got it.
J
Jeff Su57:12
All right. Thank
S
Sunny Lin57:13
All right, very clear. Thank you very much.
J
Jeff Su57:15
Thank you. Operator, can we move on to the next participant, please?
O
Operator57:21
Next one to ask a question, Brett Simpson, Arete.
B
Brett Simpson57:26
Yeah, thanks very much. I have a two-part question on this year's guidance for CC. First, CC, you mentioned that AI is still expected to double this year despite the US ban on AI GPUs into China. And I guess China was a meaningful portion of accelerator shipments, well over 10% of volumes. So, factoring this in, it would imply your AI outlook this year still doubling would mean that the AI orders have improved meaningfully outside of China in the last of the 3 months. Is that how we should interpret your comment about you still expect the business to double? And then second, we're in a June quarter where tariffs have been paused for 90 days. So, to what extent does your above-seasonal June quarter guidance reflect customer pull-ins ahead of potential tariffs being applied in the September quarter? Thank you.
J
Jeff Su58:25
Okay, so Brett, this question is on again the one part is on the AI demand that although there's a ban in China on certain AI chips or products that we reiterated our AI accelerator growth will double this year. So, his assumption is that implies a strong non-China AI-related demand and wondering what is the mechanics or can we comment beyond that behind that?
C
C. Wei58:56
Brett, you know, it's 3 months ago. Now I can tell you that 3 months ago we are barely we just cannot supply enough wafer to our customer. And now is a little bit balanced, but still the demand is very strong. And you are right. Other than China, the demand is still very strong, especially in US. And so, we are confident that we are going to double our AI revenue this year.
J
Jeff Su59:32
Yeah, and then very quickly he was asking about the second quarter revenue guidance and if there was any tariff-related pulling. I think Wendell answered this earlier.
W
Wendell Huang59:41
Yeah, I think that we have as CC said in his prepared remarks, we haven't seen any changes in customer behavior. The growth in second quarter was primarily due to the demand from our 3-nanometer and 5-nanometer technologies underpinned by the demand from the HPC platform.
J
Jeff Su1:00:03
Okay, do you have a second question, Brad? Sorry.
B
Brett Simpson1:00:07
Yeah, yeah, thanks Jeff. My second question was for Wendell and thanks for clarifying that, Wendell. Yeah, follow-up is on shareholder returns. And TSMC traditionally has always favored growing the dividends as the main policy, but many shareholders would argue that the dividend payouts are not having that much of an impact on the discounted multiple that TSMC trades at versus some of your US big tech peers. So, my question is why does TSMC management not adopt a buyback framework? Particularly with the strength of the cash position on your balance sheet at the moment. Thank you.
J
Jeff Su1:00:50
Okay, thank you, Brad. So, Brad's second question is circulated on shareholder return. He notes TSMC's policy has always been a stable and steadily increasing cash dividend and focus on cash dividend payout. His question is why do we not consider adopting more of a buyback policy? Share buyback policy.
W
Wendell Huang1:01:14
Okay, Brad. We've done studies a long time ago and we continue to revisit that. We also talked to investors. Our conclusion stays the same. The sustainable and steadily increasing dividends is a better way of returning cash to the shareholders. So, we're maintaining the policy.
J
Jeff Su1:01:43
Okay, thank you.
All right. Operator, in the interest of time, can we take the questions from the last two participants, please?
O
Operator1:01:53
Yes. Now, the line is open to Laura Chen, City.
L
Laura Chen1:01:58
Hello. Hi. Thank you very much for taking my question. Can you hear me clearly?
J
Jeff Su1:02:02
Yes.
L
Laura Chen1:02:04
Yeah, thank you. My question is also about the AI and also the US expansion. CC, you just mentioned that the core 2026. Do you see any structure change in the future AI chip design when moving to N3? Such as a chiplet, that kind of design. And also in that new trend, what is TSMC's view on the new technology such as CPO or PLP panel base? Will that still start from Taiwan first? Or you would also consider to further invest the new backend technology in Arizona since CC, you just mentioned that you would also start to build up the fab in advanced packaging in Arizona. That's my first question. Thank you.
J
Jeff Su1:03:01
Okay. That's a very broad question, but basically, if I just try to distill, she wants to know do we see any changes in the chip design, particularly moving to chiplets with N3? Do we see this more and more? What about the role of things like co-package optics and panel level packaging. And I think the essence of her question, will we continue to use our leading advanced packaging technologies like CoWoS or SoIC in Taiwan first or is this also part of the plan for the expansion in Arizona?
C
C. Wei1:03:37
That's a long question, but Nora. Yes. Our customers they continue to use TSMC's leading edge technology. And they also adopt the advanced packaging technologies more and more. And also more advanced. Right? This year is probably most of CoWoS S and then next year CoWoS Europe and etc. And we can see that customer start to picking up the SoIC and the more advanced packaging technologies. As for the what we call panel level packaging, we are aggressively developing it. And today is still in the feasibility study stage. Too early to say it will be in Taiwan or in US. But most likely it will be in Taiwan first. We ramp it up and then bring it to US.
L
Laura Chen1:04:54
Okay, thank you very much. That's very clear. And also my second question is also about the capacity allocation between Taiwan and also Arizona. CC you just shared with us that for about like 30% of the end to capacity will be in Arizona. And we know it will be starting from when or what kind of time frame you are looking for. Can we also assume that the same scale like a 30% of your Arizona fab for the advanced node in the longer term?
J
Jeff Su1:05:28
Okay, so Laura's second question is about the capacity allocation between how do we allocate between Taiwan and the US? Maybe you know, is it duplicative or extra capacity? And then very specific CC had mentioned that N2 and more advanced capacity 30% around 30% will be in Arizona once we scale up to the cluster. Will that be kind of the percentage for the leading node in the future?
C
C. Wei1:05:58
Well, you know, we have right now we plan a six fab in Arizona. And in that six fab, the 2 nanometer will be a major node. And that's what I say 30% will be there. As time goes by, after the 2 nanometer will be 1.4 and 1.0, that has not been discussed yet.
L
Laura Chen1:06:30
Okay, thank you. Thank you very much. That's very clear.
J
Jeff Su1:06:33
All right, thanks Laura. Operator, can we take the last questions from the last participant, please?
O
Operator1:06:42
The last one to ask questions, Chris Asuncion, go ahead. Go ahead, please.
C
Chris Asuncion1:06:48
Thanks for taking the question. My first one is you know, very impressive given uncertainty, you're still maintaining full year revenue guidance and also your N2 capacity plan for this year and next year. Kind of curious, what is your visibility on second half revenues and also N2 demand for wafers into next year and then I have a follow up.
J
Jeff Su1:07:10
Okay, so Chris's first question is sort of in the near term, what is our visibility into the second half business outlook and then also how do we see the demand for N2 progressing this year and also next year?
C
C. Wei1:07:27
Okay, let me talk about the first one. We're only at second quarters. So, I think it's too early to talk about the second half. We did mention that the uncertainties and risks from tariffs exist and we might get a better picture in the next few months. So, we can probably update you in the next earnings call.
J
Jeff Su1:07:52
And then the second part of it is on the demand visibility of our 2 nanometer.
C
C. Wei1:07:58
So far, actually so far is very strong as we said. All the new tape out customer is the number of the tape outs is exceeding what we expected. And as we said, the number of the new tape outs is much higher than the 3 nanometer and 5 nanometer in the same period of time.
J
Jeff Su1:08:24
Okay, and did you have a second question, Chris?
C
Chris Asuncion1:08:26
That was very helpful.
J
Jeff Su1:08:28
Yeah.
C
Chris Asuncion1:08:29
Yeah, just one quick follow up. You spoke about the Japan fab. I'm curious what is the capacity installed in Japan today and how do you think about the revenue contribution this year from Japan?
J
Jeff Su1:08:41
Okay, very Chris's second question is related to our first specialty technology fab in Japan. He wants to know what is the capacity installment for this specialty technology fab and also the revenue contribution from JASM.
W
Wendell Huang1:08:58
Yeah, the capacity for the fab will be 40k when it's ramped up. The revenue for this year compared to the whole company is really not significant at this moment. Okay, Krish?
J
Jeff Su1:09:18
Okay, Krish?
C
Chris Asuncion1:09:20
Got it. Thank you, Wendell. Thank you, Jeff. Thank you very much.
J
Jeff Su1:09:23
No problem. Okay, thank you, everyone. This concludes our question and answer session. Before we conclude today's conference, please be advised that the replay of the conference call will be accessible within 30 minutes from now. The transcript will become available 24 hours from now, and both will be available through TSMC's website at www.tsmc.com. So, thank you again for joining us today. We hope everyone continues to stay well, and hope you will join us again next quarter. Goodbye, and have a good day. Take care. Thank you.