Back
Noubar Afeyan
Founder & CEO, Flagship Pioneering

Moderna and Flagship Pioneering: Noubar Afeyan

🎥 Jul 01, 2026 📺 DeepSignal Studios ⏱ 72m 👁 3 views
In the field of bio-tech, it can take 10 years and millions of dollars to see if an experimental idea might turn into a life-saving treatment—if it ever does. Noubar Afeyan fully understood those risks when he co-founded Moderna in 2010. He and his colleagues were looking for a way to deploy the messenger RNA molecule to tackle life-threatening diseases. In January of 2020, an urgent opportunity presented itself in the form of a deadly virus that was spreading across the globe. At a breathtaking pace, Moderna produced a prototype for a COVID-19 vaccine, partnered with the NIH to test it, and p...
Watch on YouTube

About Noubar Afeyan

Noubar Afeyan, founder and CEO of Flagship Pioneering, discussed the company's approach to biotech innovation in a recent interview. He described Flagship as an entity designed to create multiple companies simultaneously, an idea he said was inspired by the venture capital model of parallel investment. Afeyan stated that Flagship initially raised about $60 million and has since launched over 100 companies, 30 of which are publicly traded. Reflecting on the development of Moderna, which he co-founded in 2010, Afeyan said the company was one of many experimental ideas pursued by Flagship. He noted that "experiments in reality and execution have dictated which of those Modernas got to live and which of those Modernas got to die." Afeyan also remarked that transformative breakthroughs can emerge from "unreasonable beginnings," adding that focusing only on "reasonable beginnings" is unlikely to yield such results.

Source: AI-verified profile updated from Noubar Afeyan's recent appearances. Browse all interviews →

Transcript (131 segments)
N
Narrator0:00
Seeing your business idea come to life is exciting, but it's also incredibly complex. But Shopify can make it simple. They provide all the tools you need to launch from day one. If you're nervous about building a website, Shopify's templates and AI tools will get you up and running with no coding needed. If you hit a wall in the setup process, Shopify's built-in AI assistant Sidekick can help you build, troubleshoot, and keep on moving. And when customers arrive, boom. Shopify checkout means more people actually buy and can check out with just one click. With Shopify to handle setup and checkout, you have more time to focus on growing your business. That's why Shopify powers millions of businesses worldwide, from household names like Gymshark and Mattel to businesses that are just getting started. All you need is the idea. Shopify handles the rest. Start your free trial at shopify.com/build. That's shopify.com/build. shopify.com/build.
Every day shareholders meet to discuss important matters about the companies you invest in. Now Vanguard is making it easy to have your voice heard in those decisions.
I
Investor1:12
Alexa, take me to Vanguard Investor Choice.
A
Alexa1:14
Got it. Texting you a link where you can set your proxy voting preference for your Vanguard Index Funds and be heard by the companies you invest in.
N
Narrator1:21
Just say, "Alexa, take me to Vanguard Investor Choice." and make your voice heard. Vanguard investors own shares of our index funds, which own shares in the companies they invest in. Available for Vanguard Index Funds that participate in Investor Choice. Vanguard Marketing Corporation, distributor.
When I pull up to a gas pump to fill my car, I'm not thinking about chemistry or engineering. I'm thinking about getting in, filling up, and getting on with my day. And it reminds me a little bit of the founders I talk to on this show, because the best ones obsess over things their customers will never see. Tiny details, invisible improvements, relentless iteration. And not because anyone's watching, but because it makes the product better. That's what the Mobil brand does. It engineers fuel the same way great founders engineer their products. Mobil Supreme Plus premium gas helps keep engines three times cleaner, which can mean better performance and improved gas mileage. It's for people who care about what's under the hood, even if they never see it. Three times cleaner compared to Mobil regular gas in port fuel injected engines. Actual results may vary. Visit mobilfuels.com for details.
G
Guy Raz2:27
We're supported by Anthropic, the team behind Claude. When I'm prepping for an interview, there's always that moment where I'm trying to turn a pile of research into an actual conversation. A founder's timeline, early decisions, big inflection points, old interviews, company background, all of it matters, but the real work is figuring out what connects. And that's where Claude has been super helpful. It helps me work through the material, organize what I already know, and find the thread, the thing that turns research into better questions. Claude is the AI for minds that don't stop at good enough. It's the collaborator that actually understands your entire workflow and thinks with you. Whether you're debugging code at midnight or strategizing your next business move, Claude extends your thinking to tackle the problems that matter. From research to strategy to the tasks that slow everything down, Claude helps you stay with the work and keep moving. For problems worth solving, get started with Claude at claude.ai/HIXT.
N
Noubar Afeyan3:39
The reality is when you have a pandemic and you're a public company and you've got material data, our sense was that we at least needed to at a high level put that out there. So, in May, we indeed did come out and say at a very high level that we had some encouraging results and people attacked us every which way for having said that because they basically said, "Well, that's doing science by press release." And so, one of the things we learned, because none of us have been in this situation before, was that we were going to get criticized no matter what we did.
G
Guy Raz4:15
From NPR, it's How I Built This, a show about innovators, entrepreneurs, idealists, and the stories behind the movements they built. I'm Guy Raz, and on the show today, how Noubar Afeyan's understanding of risk led to a life-saving vaccine and to the spectacular rise of Moderna, now one of the biggest biotech companies in the world.
Innovation and risk are inextricably linked. You can't innovate without taking a risk. The calculation any entrepreneur has to make, of course, is how much of a risk to take. One of the greatest risk-takers in American history was Thomas Edison. His team of engineers invented the lightbulb, the phonograph, the motion-picture camera, and Edison held more than a thousand patents. But, to create these world-changing inventions, Edison's team had to fail more than it succeeded. Edison famously once said, "I have not failed 10,000 times. I've successfully found 10,000 ways that will not work." It's why we don't talk about Edison's talking doll, or his electric pen, or the electrographic vote recorder, because despite massive investments of time and capital, those ideas failed. But, the risk was necessary, and those failures often led Edison's engineers down paths that would lead to totally different ideas. It's an approach that's helped to make Flagship Pioneering among the most successful biotech venture firms in the world. And let me just pause to explain all this for a moment because this episode is largely about the founding of Moderna and the man behind it, Noubar Afeyan. Moderna, as many of you know, created one of the major and most important COVID vaccines. But Moderna, the company, came out of that larger organization called Flagship. Noubar Afeyan founded Flagship Pioneering back in 1999, and the idea was to do three things all under one roof. The first, to raise lots of money to invest in innovative biotech and life sciences research. The second, to identify promising researchers and help to incubate new companies. And the third, to help manage and grow those companies. Flagship Pioneering has incubated more than 100 companies. Some of them are no longer operating, but many are thriving, including, best known, Moderna. Moderna was founded in 2010, and it's already one of the largest biotech companies on Earth. Much of that success, of course, has to do with the breakthrough technology that led to the COVID vaccine. But Moderna didn't intend to become a vaccine maker. In fact, in December of 2020, it was not equipped to mass produce vaccines. But the company had already spent billions of dollars on research around a new type of technology using mRNA molecules. And it just so happened that because of the research Moderna had been doing, it was perfectly placed to come up with a vaccine to fight the coronavirus. The story of how Noubar helped to build Moderna is also the story of how he co-founded dozens of other innovative biotech companies and the huge risks he took along the way. Noubar was born in Beirut in Lebanon. Both of his parents are Armenian by descent. His father had a thriving business importing plastics in Beirut. His mother was a trained concert pianist. But by 1975, sectarian violence had broken out in Lebanon and the country was soon to be engulfed in a long civil war.
N
Noubar Afeyan8:18
I remember a couple of events. Among the most stunning one was waking up at 5:00 in the morning with a gigantic explosion which was a building, a rather large building, maybe a block away from us that was completely leveled. And you know, with lots of dead people and it was just like a for 12-year-old at the time, that was very shocking. But then when the civil war actually broke out, we stopped going to school. So, from the beginning of '75 till probably May-June, we were at home. We would have sirens going off. We would go into the basements quite routinely. We had a ping-pong table in the basement, so that was kind of a redeeming feature in that we could play ping-pong while we were meant to stay in these underground areas. We would watch from our vantage point, probably one or two kilometers from where we were, maybe one kilometer, lots of rocket fire back and forth, buildings being blown up. And this went on for months and months. And of course, after we left, it went on for years.
G
Guy Raz9:20
Yeah. And I know, Noubar, that your dad had this thriving business. He would import plastic products into Beirut. But I guess around this time in 1975, you were about 13, the family left. You fled from Lebanon to Montreal in Canada. That was a huge, risky decision for your dad. So, what did he do when you got to Montreal? And what did the family leave behind?
N
Noubar Afeyan9:52
So, we left the apartment we owned. We left all of the warehouses of inventory he had just left completely. And actually he went back for the first time 8 years later to actually liquidate what he could. But anyway, so when he came to Montreal interestingly, he did not want to do the same thing. So, he really wanted to get into the production of something. He really wanted to make things. So, he explored and explored finding some small production operation to invest in or buy. A year and a half of trying later, he essentially decided he couldn't wait any longer and he set up exactly the same business as he had done in Beirut and started all over again.
G
Guy Raz10:34
That's amazing because your dad must have been in his 40s by then. When you got to Montreal, I'm assuming you were not fluent in French. So, you probably had to go to school. Presumably it was taught in French.
N
Noubar Afeyan10:55
No, so Montreal in '75 was still very much a bilingual place in the full sense of the word, meaning that you could coexist without speaking both languages and either language was fine. So, I ended up going to a Jesuit school, an all boys school. It was English, Loyola High School. But in the following 3 years in high school took advanced French and learned the language alongside English which was the main language of the school.
G
Guy Raz11:24
Did you grow up going to church every Sunday? Obviously the Armenian Orthodox Church is an ancient church. It goes back to Byzantine times. Did you grow up going to church every Sunday?
N
Noubar Afeyan11:40
I grew up going to church. Not only now you're making me reveal all sorts of stuff that I've never talked about. I was a choir boy from probably 7, 8 years old until I came to Montreal and I continued in Montreal as did my brothers. So we did go to church. I'd like to say every Sunday but probably it was most Sundays throughout the year. So most Armenians had a close interaction with the church and we certainly did.
G
Guy Raz12:09
All right. So you are in Montreal and I know that you went on to study chemical engineering at McGill in Montreal. But then you went to graduate school in the US. You went to MIT in Boston. And from what I read, that is where you began to focus on biochemical engineering, right?
N
Noubar Afeyan12:29
Yeah. So as I was graduating from McGill, MIT was the only place I applied to. And now I know in hindsight that it was very hard to get in and I might not have gotten in but I must say I didn't know then. I just wasn't... Maybe this is the comedy of being an immigrant in that you actually don't know a lot of things because people don't tell you you're supposed to apply to five schools and then maybe some in Canada, some in the States. So I just applied to one school. Thank God they took me and it was fascinating. It was just a completely transformative experience and ultimately ended up joining a lab and pursuing a PhD and everybody wanted to start doing this form of chemical engineering, biochemical engineering because it was clear that a whole new industry was being born without the necessary engineering cadre of engineers and principles to apply to actually making the end product. So, it was a really fortunate time to be entering the field. It took about 4 years. So, yeah, I finished in the summer of 1987.
G
Guy Raz13:38
All right. So, you've got this PhD in biochemical engineering and you can probably go work for a huge chemical company. I'm sure there were a lot of offers out there, but you decided that you wanted to maybe start your own thing and I have to assume that comes from your dad who was an entrepreneur, right? I mean, you thought, 'Yeah, well, let me. Why don't I start my own business?'
N
Noubar Afeyan14:01
It would have made for a good story if that was the case, but it turns out it wasn't. I did not think of starting a company based on my upbringing. So, in 1985, I had occasion to go to Washington D.C. to a conference that had been put on by the National Science Foundation. And by chance, I sat next to a person at lunch and asked him what he did. And he started recounting... He was my father's age and he started recounting how he and another friend of his, some maybe 30 years earlier, had graduated from a brand new field of engineering, then called electronic engineering. And he said when he graduated, they realized they didn't know what to do with what they had learned. And so, he and his friend decided that rather than joining the fray of actually doing this type of engineering, they'd make instruments that their colleagues, their friends would use in doing what they did. And they had invented the oscilloscope and decided to make some and provide it to their friends. And they started out in the garage and over time, they grew that business. And I found this very interesting. So, I asked him who he was. I just didn't know who he was at all. And he was David Packard from Hewlett-Packard. Literally. And it was really fascinating because again... So, he must have been, I think he died in the mid-90s. He was an old guy, but older. He was older certainly but I haven't thought back as to what his age was but I wouldn't be surprised if he was in his 70s, maybe 70s. At least that's how he looked to me. But very kind to spend the time and to make it and one of the things I also remember asking him is I said, you know, do I need to have a technology? Do I need to have an invention? Because I didn't have the oscilloscope. And he said, you know, not really because you're in such a new field, anything you do will be new and useful. So that stuck with me because I kind of came back with this interest in learning what I could about innovation and technology management because I figured those are at least generic things I'd have to know. But also the very first business plan I ended up writing to try to claim that we were going to do this didn't specify technology. It literally just said we're going to develop instruments that kind of addressed needs in the biotechnology field and I quickly learned that you can't raise money on that. You have to actually have something.
G
Guy Raz16:22
We're just going to start something in biotech and we'll kind of figure it out. But it is amazing to me that that meeting with David Packard because he was, of course, everybody knows that name now, right? Hewlett-Packard. But it really sounds like that encounter kind of started to get the gears in your head turning.
N
Noubar Afeyan16:42
Well, yeah, it definitely... I'll tell you one of the things that I've thought a lot about and you know, generally I realized these are fields that people don't talk about and you only really at least back then used to hear about it glorified in some success story which like Michael Jordan playing basketball is completely unapproachable for somebody who doesn't have the physique and doesn't have as I did. I grew up playing basketball. I still play some basketball but Michael Jordan was never an inspiration to me because he was so aloof physically from... I could not do what he did. Here was this guy who was completely grounded and normal and telling me about how he set out to do this and the way he said it actually more made me feel like 'and you can do it too.' And that was fascinating. That probably singularly his making it approachable, relatable was an important thing and that's why I've kind of tried to do the same to as many other people as I can.
G
Guy Raz17:39
I mean he started that business with like 550 bucks. Well, it was 1939 or whatever, but still wasn't that much money.
N
Noubar Afeyan17:46
Not that much money indeed. So yeah, what happened is that I came back, I started trying to learn about startups in general, not necessarily one that I would do because I was not close to graduating yet when I was a couple of years out still. Then I did in fact get approached by a West Coast San Diego based brand new startup company which went on to be a very successful one known by the company called Idec. They were just starting at the time and out of I think sheer desperation of not having anybody who knew engineering and they needed engineers to be able to make their product, they reached out to my professors and they said look who do you have graduating and they said well this fellow is graduating and literally they made me an offer to be vice president of process technology at this brand new startup.
G
Guy Raz18:38
You would have been guaranteed riches and financially secure and all those things, yeah.
N
Noubar Afeyan18:44
All those things. And then I would have been a very early person there and such and such. But what was interesting about that was that that's the first time I started thinking about, you know, what would my contribution be as opposed to what was my alternative thought which was should I try to figure out how to do the startup thing myself? So I kind of remember talking and talking to lots of different people getting advice and the advice I got which in hindsight was quite useful to me from some of my professors was look, if you really want to be in a startup, be in a startup where what you do matters and that you can score. You can actually make the contributions. And so, that led me to ultimately decide to start a company.
G
Guy Raz19:24
So, the story I've read and it's just a bare-bones version is that you decided to go seek funding for your venture. You didn't quite know what it was going to be, but it's going to be a biotech company and you started to reach out to venture capitalists at the time in '87 and that you didn't really know what that meant, but you knew that you had to raise some money. And how did those meetings go?
N
Noubar Afeyan19:49
Well, yeah, so the very first meeting I had, and again, these things all kind of in hindsight seem... I'm only telling you the things that stand out in my mind. The very first meeting I had was the Tuesday after Black Monday in 1987. When the market crashed. And as a by that time 25-year-old having just got my PhD, I had no idea why market crashing would have anything to do with startup funding. So, I went literally and pitched the very first time to a well-known venture capitalist, Ginger Moore, and she gave me great advice. She said, "Look, this could be a good time in a way to make sure you figure out what you want to do in the company because you're not going to have much competition. Everybody's going to run for the shore and not really venture out. And if you really can take the time to figure out what's worth doing, go work on it, get some angel money if you can, and if you persist long enough, this will come back and then it will come back up, you know." And I talked to a couple of other people, heard the same thing, and so that's what I ended up doing.
G
Guy Raz20:50
So, how did you find the money to start a business? Because biotech is cash intensive. Where did you get the capital?
N
Noubar Afeyan20:58
Well, of course, it's remarkable how every decade the amount of money you need to do roughly the same thing goes up dramatically, but back then, late 80s even early 90s, some of the more well known biotech companies were started with 10 million, 15 million dollars. In my case I only ever raised 11 million dollars over a three year period from venture capitalist but that was a lot of money. So what I needed first was the first couple hundred thousand.
G
Guy Raz21:22
Yeah. And how did you get it?
N
Noubar Afeyan21:26
I could tell you it was very, very hard. There's no better way of describing it than persistent begging because at the end of the day if you don't have something and you're proposing something that can't be shown to be either valuable or feasible then I'm not sure what the difference is between that and begging. Ultimately what happened is I talked to everybody and anybody I could meet, ended up getting connected to a gentleman named Gus Aslan and he was interested in investing small amounts of money and I got introduced to him and he said to me my lawyers will reach out to you and I'll give you a hundred thousand dollars. Which was quite remarkable. It took probably more than a year to get to that point throughout this whole period. Yeah and then in the meantime I lived off of borrowing from my dad and basically I got a part time job at MIT with my professor helping him do some things so I could at least stay afloat.
G
Guy Raz22:21
Wow. This company you founded was called PerSeptive Biosystems. And I'm going to sort of butcher this but I'm going to try to explain this in a way that hopefully most of us can understand but basically you produced equipment that separated and identified proteins which is the basis of most biotechnology drugs. This is what you need to separate these proteins and they need to be intact in order for the research to be engaged.
N
Noubar Afeyan22:47
No, you did a very good job and I can put a finer point to what was the advance. The original advance was that chromatography which was used to separate proteins had been developed to work on chemicals not proteins. Proteins are much larger in size than chemicals, and so they move around very slowly. As a result, what used to be a technique that was meant to run for 45 minutes to an hour, with proteins used to run for hours and hours. That limited the pace of advancement in research. What we invented were particles that had this interesting characteristic where you can actually force liquid to flow through them. As a result, everything went faster, so that you can actually separate proteins in 10 minutes, 15 minutes. And we showed that we could do this. We showed the actual theory behind how it was working. And then finally, that led many years later to another technology breakthrough, which really made PerSeptive kind of much more known, which was a technology called mass spectrometry. So, we worked on inventing a whole new way to cause proteins to be amenable to this type of technique, and that really opened up the protein research space significantly, and our revenues grew quite substantially as a result of that second technology.
G
Guy Raz24:03
Noubar, I've interviewed lots of people from the creative arts world, from the scientific community, different spaces where they weren't sort of entrepreneurs or business people, and had to really figure out how to structure a business. And sometimes they made mistakes. How did you know how to do that? I mean, you had partners and people involved, and even with your investors, you're 24, 25. If they were like, 'Yeah, we'll give you $100,000 for 10% of the business.' Like, how did you know what it was worth and how to structure it? And did you go to anybody for help?
N
Noubar Afeyan24:43
I did. I went to lots of people for help, and it's actually one of the more formative things that I've learned, which is that if you don't pretend you know a lot, people are much more prone to advise you and help you. And it's not hard to pretend that when you're 25 years old. But that is the first time that helped me was back in those days. I clearly didn't know much about raising money, spending money, planning, budgeting. I did have a lot of people around me who were willing to give advice. Quickly realized that a lot of that advice was quite opposed to each other. So you had to... Exactly. So what you have to do is you have to actually make some calculated bets and then I also learned early on just about everything you assume may be wrong. You constantly have to figure out, okay, if I can't keep going down that path, where am I going to go next? It's too late to think of that once you're stuck, now being opposed by whatever elements you're up against. So there's plenty of people who gave advice. I had, in fact, one of the things I remember very well is in the first instance raising money, I remember many investors by the time I had the story right telling me that they thought I'd be successful but that they didn't think my first thing would be successful. And so a whole bunch of them told me that they would want to invest in my second company. And the other thing is a lot of people told me, "Listen, you're smart, you're capable, you got a lot to learn. You should not be CEO." And it was an interesting thing because I thought to myself, I couldn't tell whether what they're saying was good for me or good for them. It was indiscernible. So what I decided to do is I kept talking to people until I found a firm to invest with me as the initial CEO, which is what I had been for the whole year and a half before. And the day after we closed a million dollars, I went to them and I said, "I don't want to be CEO. Let's go hire a CEO." And they were like shocked. And the only reason I felt that way was because I wanted to make sure they weren't investing in not me, but at the same time I thought if they really think that we should really bring in somebody for a period of time who can help work with me, then let's do that. And so we found a very, very good, late in his career senior executive. I became chairman and chief technical officer. He became CEO and for a year we worked really closely together. He taught me a lot. He helped greatly.
G
Guy Raz27:03
And as you were developing more products for PerSeptive Biosystems, who were your customers? I mean, obviously most of the people I talk to are making consumer products, so they're like today it's social media marketing and going on Instagram to find influencers, but this is not what you did then, obviously. Who were you selling your equipment to?
N
Noubar Afeyan27:24
In the first instance, there were a handful of biotechnology companies at the time who were noteworthy, Biogen, Genentech, Amgen, Genzyme. And then there was a whole bunch of pharmaceutical companies, the household brands of Roche, Novartis, GSK, and Pfizer, etc. And they all had research labs. They had huge research labs. And every one of them used to do what it is we were selling a new technology to do. And so, early adopters were not a concept back then, but clearly early adopters is how you get anything to be taken up and they become your best sales people because either they change jobs or they tell their colleagues, "Hey, I'm doing this thing really cool, you should look into it." And so eventually we started getting kind of slowly growing, hired our first sales people. And eventually when the company grew up in 1997 at the end, we were about 900 people.
G
Guy Raz28:18
As the company grew, because I think within 10 years it was acquired, right? It was a stock swap. It was a $360 million stock acquisition. And often times an acquisition means that the founders who are acquired join the parent company now and you did. I think the company was called Applera. This was the late '90s and if people remember, this was a time when there was an obsessive race to map the human genome and you were right there at ground zero of that.
N
Noubar Afeyan28:52
Yes, so Affymetrix actually was a made up name that came after the fact. The initial company that bought PerSeptive was called PerkinElmer. Ultimately, the thing we decided to do was to become a content delivery company modeled after Bloomberg with the Bloomberg terminals as you may remember. So Bloomberg takes public information, at least they did back then, annotates it, interconnects it, adds some proprietary layers on it, and then sells it as a subscription essentially through terminals. And we thought we could do the same thing with biology and the human genome project was a kind of the actual sequence became our way of actually trying to get people to come to our site in order to receive all these higher level connectivities from that baseline information.
G
Guy Raz29:36
So this would be like a Bloomberg terminal for biotech companies. The idea would be like every finance firm had a Bloomberg terminal, every biotech company would have these terminals and you could access this proprietary information.
N
Noubar Afeyan29:53
That's what we set out to build. We needed to sequence the genome first and we at first thought maybe the government's effort at the time would suffice, but it was going fairly slowly. And so we launched what became a competitive effort, although it wasn't fully intended to be competitive in the first instance. It wasn't moving fast enough. We weren't going to wait two or three more years before this information could be available, but it definitely at the time allowed both sides to do something quite spectacular, which was to complete the sequencing of the genome. In our case as a prelude to delivering this content business, in their case as the basis for much of research going forward.
G
Guy Raz30:37
It's amazing because you now spent a year being involved in one of the most groundbreaking projects in the 20th century, mapping the human genome, which clearly you knew was going to have a huge impact on medicine. Did that experience once again get the gears turning in your head thinking there's an opportunity from this for me to pursue?
N
Noubar Afeyan31:04
Yes, very much so, but in a different context than just a market opportunity. It was actually a foray into intrapreneurship, which is when a company creates a company. And I'd never thought of that as an activity before where you literally can have a parent entity conceive of one thing and really develop it internally and then spin it out, which is what we did. That actually was equally interesting. Of course, being in the middle of this whole public storm, if you will, in the many ways positive sense of the word and excitement, also pointed out the fact that we were entering a new era in molecular biology. So that was exciting, definitely.
G
Guy Raz31:48
When we come back in just a moment, how the new era of molecular biology just happened to match up with Noubar's idea for an entirely new type of biotech company. Stay with us. I'm Guy Raz, and you're listening to How I Built This from NPR.
N
Narrator32:16
This message is brought to you by Apple Card. Sometimes life's journeys take you on the roads less traveled. That's why Apple created the titanium Apple Card to use anywhere in the world where MasterCard is accepted. Plus, with Apple Card, you can earn unlimited daily cash back with every purchase, every day, whether you're in Paris or Palau. And no matter where you are, with Apple Card you won't pay annual fees or foreign transaction fees. No fees, period. That's the power of Apple Card. Apply in the Wallet app on iPhone and use it right away with Apple Pay. Subject to credit approval. Variable APRs for Apple Card range from 17.49% to 27.74% based on creditworthiness. Rates as of July 1st, 2026. Existing customers can view their variable APR in the Wallet app or at card.apple.com. Apple Card issued by Goldman Sachs Bank USA, Salt Lake City branch. Terms and more at applecard.com.
Success is a journey, especially when it comes to your finances. One of the most common obstacles in our financial journey is dealing with high interest debt. It can often leave people feeling trapped, but it doesn't have to. If you're dealing with high interest debt, there is a way forward. A SoFi personal loan could consolidate all your high interest debt into one low interest monthly payment, helping you craft a roadmap to paying down your debt. It even comes with no fees required, getting you a financial win right away. Keep on your journey to financial success. You could even get as soon as the same day funding. View your rate for a SoFi personal loan at sofi.com/guyraz. Loans originated by Bank NA, member FDIC. Terms and conditions apply. NMLS 696891. Fast funds term apply at sofi.com/guyraz.
When it comes to your health and well-being, the right care can change everything. That's why Cleveland Clinic has been elevating world-class patient care for over a century. From the most specialized heart, neurology, and cancer treatments to the latest surgical innovations and beyond, Cleveland Clinic is here for every care in the world. Whether you're exploring advanced care or just looking after your health, all the info you need is waiting for you at Clevelandclinic.org.
G
Guy Raz35:01
Hey, welcome back to How I Built This. I'm Guy Raz. So, it's the late 1990s and Noubar Afeyan is working at a biotech company called Alnylam and he's involved in lots of different projects. But over time, Noubar is getting more and more interested in promoting a whole range of new promising molecular biology, research that doesn't necessarily have immediate commercial value. And so, eventually, he leaves Alnylam to try to reimagine the way biotech companies are created.
N
Noubar Afeyan35:35
The idea was, you know, everybody was all fascinated with serial entrepreneurs and you go from one to the other, but the question that I got intrigued by, I'm not exactly sure why, is could you actually do this at the same time? Could you have multiple of these things? And I was always curious about the venture capital community, which while they weren't starting these companies, they were investing in them. And they had this parallelism down, they could be involved in therapeutic companies, some...
In cardiovascular, some in, you know, cancer. This one didn't seem to interfere with the other. And I thought, well, why can't you do that as an entrepreneur? Why can't you do that as an innovator? And so, we started an otherwise unusual entity, which was called Noubar Afeyan, and it stood for new company generation, Noubar Afeyan. That business, Noubar Afeyan, is the entity that later it called Flagship Ventures and then Flagship Pioneering. We put up about $60 million. And it was a company that would create companies, and that's how we started. The initial four or five projects, we already had some ideas what to pursue, but it was definitely buoyed by the excitement around the genome.
G
Guy Raz36:42
All right. So, this was Flagship Ventures, now called Flagship Pioneering. This is what you really launch in 2000. And this was, to be clear, very different from and still is very different from what incubators are. Usually, incubators are incubators and venture capital is venture capital. And this idea was different. I mean, the idea was that everything would happen under one roof.
N
Noubar Afeyan37:07
Exactly.
G
Guy Raz37:07
The research, the development, the teams, the businesses, almost like an MIT Media Lab, but that was a private business.
N
Noubar Afeyan37:15
Well, it's an interesting way of putting it. I'll tell you, what we set out to do is to combine the typically three separate inputs into a successful startup. That is, the scientific ideas usually come from academia,
G
Guy Raz37:33
Mhm.
N
Noubar Afeyan37:33
the entrepreneurial talent, and then capital, which is always multiple sources, venture capital, early stage, and then eventually some later stage. They all come from different places, they have different interests, and so you can imagine there's a lot of friction between all these different
G
Guy Raz37:50
Sure.
N
Noubar Afeyan37:50
different components. What we thought is, what if all three of those things pre-existed in the same entity?
G
Guy Raz37:57
Yeah.
N
Noubar Afeyan37:58
Because if you want to propose doing something that is way out there, if you will, if you're doing it the traditional way, you have to convince other people to join you, and in any case, you have to convince investors to fund you. And all they care about is to minimize the risk. And so, that's where we really found our footing is to say, can we take that advantage of having all three under one roof, and apply it to propel ourselves beyond where people are comfortable going.
G
Guy Raz38:28
Noubar, obviously by this point when you started Flagship, you were a known entity. People knew the story of your previous businesses. But how did you recruit talent to come to Flagship and to take that leap that you guys would have their back.
N
Noubar Afeyan38:44
Well, I would say it took quite a while. So, the first battle was hiring leadership into our companies because our own team size didn't have to grow very much, but the companies we were forming needed to attract leadership. And that was where we started really thinking more systematically what kind of people could make the transition. Unlike the software field and for that matter, these days internet-based companies or apps, there's a lot of people who've done multiple companies. In biotech, these companies have a half-life or a life cycle of, say, 10 years, 15 years. So, people don't do one company after another after another. If they do one company after 10, 15 years and they succeed, they stop doing it. So, you have to create the talent. You have to create and cross-fertilize. And so, the early leadership of our companies is all Flagship team members. And what that does is it doesn't mean that they're any better. It just means that they're more experienced and we're more familiar with them.
G
Guy Raz39:45
You had a huge advantage in that you were in one of the biotech capitals of the world, which is the Boston area. But I imagine you were recruiting probably promising graduate students and scientists. Do I have this right that you would basically pair them up with people who could help to navigate their businesses? So, presumably people with science backgrounds, but who could do the business side of it?
N
Noubar Afeyan40:11
In the earlier days, it was more experimental, if you will. I did a lot of that just because I had quite a bit of experience by this time.
G
Guy Raz40:19
From little company to company and kind of help them?
N
Noubar Afeyan40:22
Absolutely.
G
Guy Raz40:23
Help guide them. Yeah.
N
Noubar Afeyan40:24
There was a time back a decade ago when I would have been on 15 different boards and literally was kind of running around trying. I had a colleague that calls was with us now as a managing partner. So it was just early days in 2000, 2007, 8. We were figuring out what can be systematized and what cannot. And what is a team sport and what is not. You know, there's a lot of folklore in the startup world which I'd say emphasizes the role of the individual. There's a hero kind of notion that's created against all odds. And here we were claiming that conceiving, creating, growing companies could be the object of a company. Very methodical, very learning oriented, responsible to certain goals or accountable, let's say, versus kind of improvisational, romantic, chaotic, all the things that come to mind when you think of startups. I've spent the last 20 years together with my colleagues here trying to show that most of that is unneeded. Some of that may be needed. Some of that may be how people decide to do it, but that's not the only way you can do it.
G
Guy Raz41:34
And just to be clear, most of these companies that you were hatching and forming, they were focused on biomedical research mainly?
N
Noubar Afeyan41:42
They were focused on biomedical research or applications of life science in sustainability.
G
Guy Raz41:47
Got it. So there are a lot of origin stories around mRNA research that go back to the 70s and the 80s and Bob Langer who is one of the best biotechnologists in the world and he would go on to become a Moderna co-founder. He was doing all kinds of research. And in the early 2000s, I read a story about some researchers from University of Pennsylvania who were doing some pretty groundbreaking work around mRNA. They went to a scientific conference and almost nobody, this is 20 years ago, almost nobody in the scientific community was taking this seriously. When did you first, what did mRNA research first come onto your radar?
N
Noubar Afeyan42:34
Let me answer that by first pointing out to you that 5 years ago nobody was taking mRNA research seriously. So yes, that's kind of an interesting thing. But back in 2010, May of 2010, got a call from Bob Langer one day and he said to me, 'Hey look, I just met with a junior faculty member at Harvard who approached me.' And so I went over and met with him and met with the faculty member, Derrick Rossi, and he showed some of the scientific work that this lab had done. Essentially what they'd done is they'd taken mRNA and used the codes for the four what's called Yamanaka factors. Yamanaka factors are transcription factors. Think of these as proteins that interact with the human genome and control what genes get made and what genes don't get made. And that's what he was presenting and he was interested in that as potentially the basis of something useful in the biomedical research field. I got interested in it on the spot. When I what if we could do this to introduce it into the body and have our own cells make drugs out of it. And so I asked that question in the meeting with Bob. He said, 'Look, I don't know why we couldn't try.' And so what ended up happening is we agreed that I would go back and initiate a project within Flagship to start exploring whether that could be something of interest and use without any regard to whether we could technically do it or how we could do it, but rather more just explore could we think about a molecule that when introduced to the body could cause the body to make any protein we wanted? And that's how the journey started for us. That's what became Moderna.
G
Guy Raz44:16
It's amazing. I mean, the idea was that you had was could we basically make medicines where you would inject them in order for the body to develop the proteins, right? To combat the ailment or whatever it is. That was the question that was being asked at the time.
N
Noubar Afeyan44:36
That was the question that we asked as the impetus for an exploration.
G
Guy Raz44:40
And the answer to that question generally was no, that's ridiculous. Is that right? More or less?
N
Noubar Afeyan44:45
Well, the premonition was that it was ridiculous because it had never really been shown to be viable. And we, by asking the question, we gave ourselves the permission to go find out why it is that either nobody had done it or nobody believed it could be done. And we quickly found out that people had tried it in the '80s and they had caused pretty significant immune response in cells. So people had this idea earlier, but it turns out it's not just the mRNA and the immunology. You then have to figure out which cells are going to take these up. How much do they have to take up to make therapeutic doses available in your circulation? How do you know if the protein is actually the right protein? Meaning will it fold correctly? Will it secrete correctly? You're basically going in and introducing a tiny new piece of software, not hardware. You're not messing with the hardware, but the software to make a particular protein in a sea of thousands of other proteins being made every nanosecond of the day. So you got to get in precisely, make the protein you want, have the effect you want. So there were a lot of unknowns. But we list them and we could start asking a lot of people out there, what makes you think it can't be done, what are the impediments, what has been tried. That's how we do much of our innovations, that we kind of work backwards from an asserted destination, we want to be able to do this, and then try to tie it to the present.
G
Guy Raz46:17
I wanted to ask you about doubt. I mean, I understand that Flagship was really designed to do exactly this kind of work, to take on something risky and kind of weird, and maybe the scientific consensus was not, there was no consensus, the community was skeptical of this research. I understand that Flagship was designed for this very reason, in order to take some risks that might fail. But I'm curious, this was going to require a lot of money, a lot of time, and a lot of uncertainty. And most, I mean, you had great researchers and scientists, didn't anybody in Flagship that you talked to say, 'This is not what we should pursue.' Didn't anybody push back? Didn't you have doubts?
N
Noubar Afeyan47:06
I think we should I should try to put it in context. The important thing to realize is that we are set up to make innovation leaps that are beyond adjacencies. So the notion of adjacency, if you just simply on a piece of paper said in any given field in any given endeavor of activity, I could draw a circle and let that circle represent everything that's known or everything that exists. And then I draw another ring around that circle that represents all sorts of things that have not yet been done, but are going to be done next. So imagine a sense of the arrow of time going outward from one circle to the next ring. Sure. And that's kind of for me a simplistic mental model of how innovation, science, products in the marketplace occur. Now, what defines the size of that adjacency? It's how far people are willing to go before they stop thinking that something is reasonable to work on. So the question is, when will we ever work beyond that adjacency? In the ordinary course, you get there when you get there. So you wait for a while, some new things happen, and then eventually you start working on what would have been too far out before, but now it's not so far out. So our job is to see if we could work beyond the adjacencies today.
G
Guy Raz48:31
But, what I'm trying to understand, Noubar, is this could have been a very different story, right? The story of Moderna could have been a story of folly. Of a bunch of well-funded scientists who just spent all of this money, and it was a disaster. And we could have been telling that story at business schools. I mean, there's always a possibility that would have been the story. And by green-lighting Moderna, you had to consider certain factors. But if most of the scientific community was saying, 'This is not worth doing,' why did you and your team think differently?
N
Noubar Afeyan49:09
So, you're asking the question in a in the context, it's a very valid question, but I want to say you're asking the question in isolation. Let me also just tell you that in the exact same year that we did the foundation laying for what became Moderna, we also started four other projects that were each platforms in their own right going after different aspects of biomedical opportunity space, each with as big a leap, each with as much doubt, and we did that the year before, and we've done that for 11 years since. So, in fact, I've described this before, and I think it's really important to understand: we didn't conceive of Moderna. We conceived of 100 different Modernas. And what's happened is, and this is very much how I look at this, is that experiments in reality and execution have dictated which of those Modernas got to live and which of those Modernas got to die.
G
Guy Raz50:00
How many of those other Modernas didn't make it? You said we launched 100.
N
Noubar Afeyan50:06
A lot. A lot. We didn't launch 100. We had imagined 100. And so the point I'm making is the accuracy with which you have to guess what's going to work is not at all important. Because we get into these brand new areas, it's wide open to find where value lies. Right? Imagine if we waited 3, 4 years, as people did, or 10 years in the case of mRNA. Now all of a sudden they'd go into the space and there's hundreds of patents and there's tons of different things that have already been done. That's a very different competitive approach. What we tend to do is say, you know what? We'll risk the possibility that there's absolutely no value to be had.
G
Guy Raz50:44
Yeah.
N
Noubar Afeyan50:45
So it's not that you have to get it dead right where you land. You just have to be in a rough space where you now start searching for where value might be. Is it delivering it into the liver or skin? Is it doing vaccines or cardiovascular drugs? So all of those variables, at least for me, represent alternative success versions of which I don't need everyone to succeed. I just need one to succeed.
G
Guy Raz51:13
When we come back in just a moment, one version of success that Noubar did not anticipate was how Moderna would develop a critical vaccine at a critical time and do it unbelievably fast. Stay with us. I'm Guy Raz and you're listening to How I Built This from NPR.
N
Narrator51:47
Hey, welcome back to How I Built This. I'm Guy Raz. So, we're getting to the part of the story where Moderna will go from being a biotech company you probably never heard of to a household name for tens of millions of people. And it's easy to forget that when the company launched in 2010, the idea was to find the best use for the new research around mRNA. And at that time, it wasn't at all clear that the best use would be a vaccine.
N
Noubar Afeyan52:17
We worked from day one on any number of diseases, cardiovascular disease, cancer, and vaccines were a part of our thinking process. But indeed, what we did do is we went after everything.
G
Guy Raz52:31
Right.
N
Noubar Afeyan52:32
That's the hundred versions of Moderna that I'm referring to. We did not think for a minute that we were smart enough to anticipate what we should actually apply the platform to. And this is something else that probably is worth pointing out. We have over the years in our flagship labs kind of realized that rather than inventing technologies, we really had to invent platforms. And a platform is a relatively rare thing in biotechnology, unlike in the tech sector, where we've seen phenomenal examples of platforms, whether it's the iOS, Apple's platform, or Amazon's. That whole idea of a technological suite upon which many products could be developed or attached. By 2010, before we even started Moderna, that is something that we had started many companies around that notion. And so, Moderna only ever was going to be a platform that enabled a code-based molecule to make proteins in the subjects, no matter what application it was. And a key discipline of that is to say, try many applications.
G
Guy Raz53:39
Yeah.
N
Noubar Afeyan53:40
And so, we had, by the time this coronavirus came along, we had tested nine, maybe even 10 different human vaccines. In every single case showing neutralizing antibodies. And we had also another nine programs that were going after human therapeutics. So, it was a fairly broad platform that had already been developed. About $2 billion of research had gone into developing the platform.
G
Guy Raz54:05
Yeah.
You went public in 2018. You still hadn't sold any products, really. You had an operating loss of almost $400 million. 2019, still you, this is 9 years in to Moderna. You had not, I believe you had not sold anything yet, and you had almost half a billion dollars in losses. But none of that it seems phased you or the team at all. That was not even a concern.
N
Noubar Afeyan54:37
Yeah, so it's not an, in fact, Guy, what I can tell you having spent the last 34 years in the biotechnology field is that there is no biotech company that was started in 2010 with rare exceptions, maybe one in a hundred, that had revenues by that time. So it's par for the course. That's not because of the failing of the technology, that's because it takes 5 to 10 years to actually develop a product in our field. So, it's a little bit like saying I want to start a new airplane company, and then I'm surprised that I don't have an airplane on the market in the first 10 years. Well, it takes 14 years. Now, what would have been surprising is if we didn't have products in clinical testing. And that's something that was completely missed because before a single vaccine for coronavirus that we tested, we had already 2,000 people who had received mRNA from us. And so, we were far advanced in many different mRNAs for different activities, vaccines, non-vaccines, and that's what allowed us to have the conviction that what we would do in this space could be quite productive.
G
Guy Raz55:50
Okay, let's go back to the timeline for a moment because it's almost like it plays out like a movie, like a thriller. From what I understand, I think it was like January 6th, 2020, Stéphane Bancel, who's the CEO of Moderna, he found out about this virus in China and that it was probably a coronavirus. And I think a few days later the first death was publicly announced in China. And at that point, I think that's January 11th, 2020, almost no one in the US was talking about this seriously or in a big way. I mean, probably a few people, but almost nobody. Do you remember this story coming onto your radar around that time?
N
Noubar Afeyan56:33
Well, in the very early parts of January, we were exchanging emails and articles that were appearing largely around the Wuhan situation. Initially, it was thought to be a flu-like thing, pneumonia, and it wasn't until January 23rd, which I remember quite clearly, partly because it was my daughter's birthday and I was out at dinner with her in Cambridge, close to MIT. I actually got a call from Stéphane, who was in Davos. The situation had increased in terms of intensity. It was not clear what this would become. It was not a pandemic. It was not at all viewed that way, but that it could become a threat was beginning to at least appear. And our discussion, interestingly, was twofold. One, we probably didn't have any choice but to at least do the first steps of this work because if we didn't, then we'd be late reacting to it later on. But then second, it was an interesting opportunity for us to test the platform in one of its earliest, at least imagined advantages that we could never test in any other time, which was that it would be a very rapid response technology. This technology had this innate advantage we knew from day one that if you ever needed to go quickly, we could really go quickly because it was just a code molecule. You just sequence, put the sequence in for the DNA, you make the RNA in one step, you put it in LMP in a second step, and you're done. I'm simplifying, but not by much. And so, what was exciting to us was that we said we want to test our platform's ability to demonstrate very rapid capability to respond. And we did not know what an advantage that was.
G
Guy Raz58:18
I mean, I think virtually overnight you and Stéphane decided to pursue this, to try and do this, to manufacture the vaccine.
N
Noubar Afeyan58:25
Absolutely. It looked like the right thing to do and an incremental proof point for us that we were happy to jump into. Now, I must say, within days, probably a couple of weeks, the whole thing changed in its importance and significance, and we were quite happy that we had jumped in so early on because that's the only way that by already March we could enter the first humans and get data.
G
Guy Raz58:49
How long before you had a prototype for the vaccine? Because from what I understand, the fastest time it took to get a vaccine from development to market was the MMR, one of these childhood things, measles. It was like 5 years or something. So in this case, how quickly were you able to develop a prototype?
N
Noubar Afeyan59:12
From the time we had the sequence to the time we had...
G
Guy Raz59:17
Of the coronavirus.
N
Noubar Afeyan59:18
Of the coronavirus. Chinese published, I think, right? They made that available, yeah. And to the time when we had the computer-generated sequence of the RNA that is essentially today mRNA-1273 was 2 days.
G
Guy Raz59:30
Two days from the time that it was published, you basically had a computer model of the vaccine.
N
Noubar Afeyan59:39
A basically a computer model of the sequence of mRNA that would essentially, when introduced into a human, would produce the S protein sufficient to generate an immune response.
G
Guy Raz59:50
I mean, at the time, did you know that if it just got into clinical trials, it would be quickly shown to be effective? Like, did you know that from the computer models?
N
Noubar Afeyan1:00:01
Well, we knew that in every other protein that we had used in humans before, we could generate neutralizing antibodies. That much we knew. Whether we could make enough of it quickly enough, let alone to be able to do a 30,000 subject trial, which we'd never even dreamt of before, that was the unknown. The unknown was, can you make enough of it?
G
Guy Raz1:00:22
Yeah.
N
Noubar Afeyan1:00:22
And we had some questions as to what we should choose. But essentially, there was a lot unknown, and we just had to kind of decide based on the best information what to try. We tried it, and by May of 2020, we had already the first human data that showed that we could generate robust antibody levels.
G
Guy Raz1:00:40
In March of 2020, you began clinical trials with the NIH. It was I think a nurse in Seattle that same month, March of 2020. Your father-in-law died of COVID.
N
Noubar Afeyan1:00:55
April. Yeah, April is when he passed away, yeah.
G
Guy Raz1:00:58
Yeah, in Easter.
N
Noubar Afeyan1:01:01
I mean, this was affecting all of us. I mean, everybody knows somebody who was either severely ill or was killed by this.
G
Guy Raz1:01:08
I was devastated because his wife, my mother-in-law, also got quite sick, and we thought we're going to lose her as well. They were both in their early 90s. So, it was very, very tough. Also because we were engaged in this day-to-day battle and on the one hand I was excited by what we were able to do and on the other hand when you see, in his case ultimately a life lost, it's just a... Anyway, it was quite personal to me. Let me just say that I have not lost a family member during the time of iPhones and I can tell you that being on a FaceTime with somebody close to you when they're dying is a miserable experience. So, it was very tough and it certainly brought into sharp focus what this was all about. Certainly many people lost lives and many more are suffering even today with the downstream effects of this disease.
But you knew already from that first clinical trial that the news was good. That the initial results from phase one were good but you had to go through two more phases and the public were not privy to that information for a variety of reasons, right? You could not come out and say, 'Hey, phase one looks great. These are the results.' There are rules against that, right?
N
Noubar Afeyan1:02:30
Well, we indeed in May we indeed did come out and say at a very high level that we had some encouraging results and people attacked us to every which way for having said that because they basically said, 'Well, that's doing science by press release.' And many other things. And the reality is when you have a pandemic and you're a public company and you've got material data, our sense was that we at least needed to at a high level put that out there. So, one of the things we learned because none of us had been in this situation before was that we were going to get criticized no matter what we did. And so, we just had to do what we thought was right, make some calls, explain ourselves. And so, we did that. We ultimately published the data. The NIH came out and presented their data. We were quite surprised that people were questioning the NIH's own clinical research. We didn't do the clinical work, they did.
G
Guy Raz1:03:23
Yeah.
By the end of the third trial, phase three end of November, and you announced that the preliminary data showed that the efficacy rate was 94%. Did that surprise you? Even you?
N
Noubar Afeyan1:03:40
It did surprise me. And it wouldn't surprise me scientifically, it surprised me because by that time, I had lowered my expectations largely by having heard so much about how difficult all this would be. You look at how vaccines are made, they either take bits and pieces of proteins and they make them artificially and they combine them and they put adjuvants that kind of get your immune system to get angry. There's nothing molecular about the current approaches. Here we were putting in a single protein delivered in known way to specific cells. And so we were really priming the immune system. But still, there was no basis to believe that we could do 90 anything. It's not at all typical in vaccines, let alone with a new technology, let alone out of the gates, that you start at 94. We thought if we were well above 50%, at least we would start putting up a fight and maybe we can make a better and better version.
G
Guy Raz1:04:33
And in parallel to the testing, presumably you had to ramp up your ability to produce this vaccine.
N
Noubar Afeyan1:04:40
Yes, and that was really the massive heroism that I think of. Of all the things, we could not imagine that we could make a billion doses the first year of production up from probably making a thousand doses the year before of anything.
G
Guy Raz1:04:57
How did you do that? How did you go from a capacity to make a thousand or 10,000 to a billion in less than a year?
N
Noubar Afeyan1:05:04
Well, first of all, all these things start with people. We had the great fortune of having a gentleman named Juan Andres who as head of our whole technical operations, manufacturing, quality, the whole field, previously held that role at Novartis, one of the largest pharmaceutical companies, had gone through previous flu epidemic scale up of vaccines of that generation, and just is a phenomenal leader of people, and he was really a godsend to us. And when it came to planning rapidly, responding, organizing, hiring people, and just not taking 'that's not possible' for an answer for just about anything that they did in terms of either time frames or scale, and several months later, we started producing millions of doses, and then eventually tens of millions and hundreds of millions of doses.
G
Guy Raz1:05:57
What does this mean now? What does it mean for the development of other vaccines or other treatments? I mean, has this at least to the scientific community proved that you can really maybe develop a long-lasting flu vaccine or a malaria vaccine or an HIV vaccine? Is that within the realm of possibility?
N
Noubar Afeyan1:06:23
Well, you asked me two questions in one. One was, has it proved that? The answer is no. But does it suggest that that's possible and perhaps wise to work on? The answer is yes. And we are working on it. I'm only saying it because I learned long ago, Thomas Kuhn and all these guys who've written on these things, that the scientific process is one of organized skepticism. And that organized skepticism is a good thing because it keeps you constantly looking for proof. I would say that there's a slightly greater reason to believe that mRNA could actually be a new drug modality. But the other thing it does, just to come back more broadly to what it is that we've been doing in Flagship, is that it illustrates that yet again, completely transformative things can come out of unreasonable beginnings. And that if all you do is look for reasonable beginnings, you're probably not going to find breakthroughs.
G
Guy Raz1:07:21
It's probably remarkable to younger people today that everybody had the chicken pox not that long ago. And no kids don't get it anymore because there's a vaccine. Is there a potential future where there's no such thing as seasonal flu?
N
Noubar Afeyan1:07:39
Data cannot say, although I never want to say no to that either. Because more broadly, Guy, raising an issue which is important to me and I've worked for the last 2 years. And that is broadly what I would view as health security or practicing medicine in a preemptive way. And what I mean by that is we've learned so much about disease that we realize that disease isn't just a switch that goes on and all of a sudden you have it and you have to fight it, but that there are long ramps, on-ramps towards disease that if we could intervene long before the disease is manifest and we can find it now with new techniques, then both to prevent it through vaccines, but also to delay it, slow it down, redirect it. There's many things we can do. And I think unless we do those things, if all we do is wait for diseases to be good in advance until we start treating them, the cost of that, the human loss as a result of that is just going to be prohibitive. So in the same vein, I can imagine a time when seasonal flu is mastered and basically kept at bay. Why? Because I think that we're learning enough about the immune system that if we intervene early enough and broadly enough, we may well create a protective shield against these hyper variable viruses like influenza, like corona, like rhinovirus that causes the common flu, like HIV. I mean, there's a lot of these threats that aren't just themselves threats, but that they're hyper proliferating threats. And for that, our immune system is the only answer.
G
Guy Raz1:09:15
Noubar, when you think about the arc of your career and your life, a chance meeting with David Packard who kind of inspires you to think about maybe you starting your own thing, taking a gamble on mRNA, which would lead to the fastest vaccine ever manufactured in history, to now, Moderna was founded 10 years ago. Its market cap the last I checked was almost $170 billion. And that's just one of the businesses you started. It's a pretty remarkable story. How much of where you are today do you attribute to how hard you worked and how much do you think has to do with just luck?
N
Noubar Afeyan1:10:00
How hard I worked is a function of probably the orientation that I had that as an immigrant, you don't really take much for granted. You don't think much is owed to you, and everything is a possibility. And you have to go get it. In my case, the motivator has been truly trying to figure out if we could innovate a new way to innovate. So, hard work, yes. In terms of luck, it's ironic that you asked me that because somebody had written to me something the other day that I wanted to respond to, but I didn't, by saying better lucky than good in the sense that I think that to some extent, counting on luck is not a strategy, but it is the case that no matter how hard you work, there's no guarantee that the opportunity will come up or that you will fail to fail long enough to succeed. And these are all things that otherwise can only be explained by chance. But I don't know what to do with that because I can't count on it. I can't summon it. If I could summon it anytime, that would be fun, but I can't. And so therefore it doesn't play any role in my actions, and when it comes, it comes.
N
Narrator1:11:09
That's Noubar Afeyan. He's co-founder and chairman of Moderna. He's also the founder and CEO of Flagship Pioneering. Today, Moderna is probably the most famous biotech company Noubar has developed, but since it was founded over 20 years ago, Flagship Pioneering has helped launch more than 100 other companies. And of those, 30 are now publicly traded. Thanks so much for listening to the show this week. If you're not yet a subscriber, please do subscribe wherever you get your podcasts. If you want to write to us, our email address is [email protected]. And if you want to follow us on Twitter, we're @guyraz or @howibuildthis. You can also find us on Instagram. That's @howibuildthisnpr or my personal account @guy.raz. This episode was produced by Casey Herman with music composed by Ramtin Arablouei. It was edited by Neva Grant with research help from Claire Morishima. Our production staff includes JC Howard, James Delahousie, Rachel Faulkner, Liz Metzger, Julia Carney, Farah Safari, Elaine Coats, Annelise Over, and Harrison V.J. Choy. Jeff Rogers is our executive producer. I'm Guy Raz and you've been listening to How I Built This. This is NPR.