Back
Neal Mohan
Chief Executive Officer, YouTube, YouTube, LLC

YouTube CEO Neal Mohan on AI, Censorship & the Future of Creators

🎥 Feb 10, 2024 📺 Family Cartoon ⏱ 28m
(0:00) Introducing YouTube CEO Neal Mohan (1:08) YouTube's revenue split with creators (7:30) How Neal thinks about enabling monoculture and connective threads at YouTube (11:23) Censorship on YouTube, demonetization decisions, dealing with different regimes and laws globally (19:58) YouTube TV, YouTube Premium, and channel subscriptions (24:00) Generative AI on YouTube: labeling AI, likeness concerns, possibilities Thanks to our partners for making this happen! Solana - Solana is the high performance network powering internet capital markets, payments, and crypto applicat...
Watch on YouTube

About Neal Mohan

Neal Mohan, CEO of YouTube, has been discussing the platform's relationship with creators, artificial intelligence, and content moderation. In a February 2024 interview, Mohan stated that YouTube paid out over $70 billion to the creator economy over the previous three years, calling it "the original and world's largest creator economy." He also addressed past criticism of the platform's content moderation decisions during the COVID-19 pandemic, saying the company's approach "has to be flexible to the environment and the context of it." Regarding AI, Mohan said YouTube is working on "likeness detection" technology that would allow creators to control whether AI-generated content featuring their image remains on the platform. Mohan has also spoken about YouTube's cultural influence and his personal background. At the 2026 TAAF Heritage Month Summit, he described his father's immigration from India to the United States and his own experiences feeling like an outsider, which he said led him to value storytelling as a universal connector. He said YouTube's mission is to "give everyone a voice and show them the world," adding that the platform has "no gatekeepers" and allows anyone to share their story. In a May 2026 interview with Deadline, Mohan said YouTube aims to be "the best place where they can build their fandom and their audiences, but also to grow their businesses," and described the platform as "the leading streaming platform."

Source: AI-verified profile updated from Neal Mohan's recent appearances. Browse all interviews →

Transcript (127 segments)
H
Host0:02
The man himself, CEO of YouTube.
N
Neal Mohan0:06
I didn't realize that when I took over the CEO gig, a big part of my job would be being a straight man for a lot of YouTubers out there.
H
Host0:12
YouTube is now by far the biggest streamer in the world.
N
Neal Mohan0:16
Shorts, I think, has just surpassed 70 billion views a day.
H
Host0:19
Mohan was one of the pioneers of internet advertising and keeping the world's largest creator economy afloat.
N
Neal Mohan0:25
We think we're really still in the early days of our growth story and fulfilling what our mission is, which is to give everyone a voice and show them the world.
H
Host0:34
Ladies and gentlemen, please welcome YouTube CEO Neal Mohan.
Neal, how are you?
N
Neal Mohan0:47
Good to see you, brother.
H
Host0:48
See you. Thanks.
All right, Neal. Nice to see you.
N
Neal Mohan0:52
David, how are you?
D
David0:53
Nice to see.
H
Host0:53
All right, welcome, Neal. Neal.
N
Neal Mohan0:58
I know I could have done that together.
H
Host1:00
I mean, you could have.
What did you think?
J
Jason1:03
We talked to him a little bit about which platform is the most important. He said the one that pays us the most. You don't pay for content up front. You've done some experiments. You do it all with the 55% revenue split. You sweep 45%. Seems like you're doing pretty well. Are you taking too much money from creators?
H
Host1:21
Let's get into it.
That down to 30%?
N
Neal Mohan1:24
Well, first of all, thank you all for having me. It's a privilege to be with you guys. Like they say, long-time listener, first-time caller. So, it's great to be here with all of you.
H
Host1:33
Do you listen to the pod, yeah?
N
Neal Mohan1:34
I watch it.
H
Host1:35
Oh, you watch it. Where do you watch it? What did you, you like the audio or video?
N
Neal Mohan1:39
Oh, on YouTube. Yes, we're there now. We are there now, yes.
H
Host1:43
Can you please be prepared? [laughter]
N
Neal Mohan1:45
Yes. Yes.
H
Host1:45
I didn't know we had a YouTube channel. Really? How's it doing?
Folks watch it on YouTube? Just out of curiosity. There we go.
All right. Okay.
N
Neal Mohan1:52
Yeah, yeah, yeah. It is about half, yeah.
The channel is growing. You guys are going to close to a million subs, watch time, views, all up and to the right. So, congrats to all of you guys on that. But, on your question, Jason, so we've paid out in the last 3 years over $70 billion to the creator economy. We are the original and world's largest creator economy. And so, all right. Well done. And that innovation, which is called the YouTube Partner Program, is well over a decade now. The 55-45 that you're referring to. And so, we pay out billions to creators. Creators, our media company partners, the music partners, et cetera. I'm using that term creator and I'll use it for the next 30 minutes sort of in the broadest sense of the term. It's just that the way that we do it is very different. I mean, we're a creator economy in the true entrepreneurial sense of the word, which is if you're a creator on YouTube, contrast to the traditional model, you're betting on yourself, which is kind of the opposite of the way that traditional media models have worked. And as you grow, as your audience grows, as your success grows, your monetization grows. Your business grows as well. And not every creator on our platform is going to become, you know, Mr. Beast or Dude Perfect, but there are, you know, north of 3 million creators that are in that partner program today earning revenue.
J
Jason3:20
Back to my question, I feel like you've created all these stars. And you look at the Tuckers, you look at the Megans, you know, we'll put ourselves maybe right behind them. We all choose to turn off monetization because the take rate's too high and we can do it better ourselves. Should you not start to think about two classes of folks? The up-and-comers who don't have sales teams, who don't have distributions, maybe it's more about building an audience, and then maybe looking at the folks like us slightly differently. And this seems to be a weakness in your game. Your take?
N
Neal Mohan3:58
I would say that, you know, the way I think about it
H
Host4:01
He doesn't speak for us.
N
Neal Mohan4:04
I personally myself
H
Host4:06
I just want to be clear that I love you.
J
Jason4:08
No, no, but it's clear that people who are at this level take it on themselves because the 45% is just an absurdly high take rate for that level of person, the Tuckers, the Megans. They'd rather just bake their ads in. So, how do you think about that level of folks? They participate, but you don't monetize them.
N
Neal Mohan4:25
I think that that's not the way I would characterize it, first of all. I think the way that I think about it is all of these monetization models should be available to you depending on what your business objectives are and what they're not. And I've talked to a bunch of you guys about sort of how you think about that monetization question and what's important versus audience building and not. And by the way, it's the same type of conversation that happens with sports leagues or studios or what have you. And so, my vision on all of this is whatever model works for you as a creator, podcaster, what have you, should be the model that you adopt. And so, for example, you take what Tucker's doing and Megan's doing and they have had enormous success on our platform, mostly driven because they're incredibly talented at what they do. And the audience and the algorithm have figured that out. But it might be that the monetization model that works best is something where they're representing their inventory themselves. And that I think is less about sort of take rate or what have you, but sort of the best way to actually package it up. And so, that's really the way that I think about it. But if you're a creator getting started today, you're not even concerned with that at all because the monetization is really only a byproduct of what you've been able to do from an audience engagement standpoint.
H
Host5:47
The net is what matters, right? At the end of the day if it's
Yeah, take rates 55, 20, 90. If you're making more money doing this than other things, of course.
A great example again just
Algorithm and maybe you can speak to the quality of the algorithm and the ads placement. You come from the ads business. You were DoubleClick.
N
Neal Mohan6:01
Yeah.
H
Host6:01
How good YouTube's ad placement and ad quality is relative to other platforms and how that actually increases
N
Neal Mohan6:08
Yeah, I mean I think what I'd say on that is it's really two things. One is, you know, obviously we invest very heavily in making it so that the advertising you see whether you're watching YouTube on a television screen or on your phones or your laptops is relevant, it's targeted, the creative formats are there. We are a platform that caters to advertisers that are brand advertisers, brand builders as well as direct response. And so, that is a big area of investment, but the reason why from and I spend a lot of time talking advertisers why they're also excited about the ROI is that the engagement is differentiated. And that turns into ROI for advertisers. And what I mean by that is if you go to YouTube, you are really leaned into what you're watching. You are a Mr. Beast super fan. You're a Michelle Khare super fan. You're a, name your favorite creator super fan. And that is a different type of engagement that actually translates into different ROI regardless of where your objectives are in the marketing funnel. And that's our secret sauce. That's where this $70 billion that we pay out to the creator economy and all these hundreds of thousands of jobs that we create in the creator ecosystem on a daily basis come from.
A
Ari7:27
Let me just uplevel this in more of a general question. 10 years ago, 15 years ago, the cable channels and the way that we consumed content was largely live. We would tune in for shows. And one of the byproducts of that was national culture. Right? There would be these things that would enter the zeitgeist and we'd all talk about it and we would be unified by it. And on the plus side of all of this infinite distribution is you get to watch what you want. The downside of it is there's really no connective thread almost that we all talk about that's the same. How does YouTube view that problem? Is it a problem? Is there a responsibility or are there things that you can do to kind of make things that are a little bit less on demand, a little bit more appointment viewing that kind of builds identity and culture?
N
Neal Mohan8:19
Yeah, I think it's a really interesting question. And again, one of the consequences of what you're talking about vis-a-vis the algorithm or what have you is, you guys open up your phones right now, that YouTube feed of yours is going to look like you, right? It really is about what you're genuinely interested in and watching and that does lead to, it can lead to that type of fragmentation that you're describing. Having said that, if you ask someone a Gen Z or a millennial sort of what were the top four or five really big breakout pop culture trends, a lot of them are actually an aggregation of a lot of these types of things and they could be trends that might not be the most relevant to all of us or this audience, but they are for a particular age group. And so the answer is that we do see a lot of those sort of national and in many cases because YouTube's a global platform, 2 billion people come to it every single day, there's enough aggregation even amongst these niche areas where you do see some of that. The other thing that I will say about how I think about it is I do think that live and sort of like those water cooler type moments are really important. You saw the biggest one of those happen on YouTube just 2 days ago. That Brazil game that Ari was mentioning was on YouTube.
H
Host9:48
Yeah.
N
Neal Mohan9:48
And the reason why it was such a success, I would argue, is because of that aperture what YouTube can obviously do from a reach standpoint. But the other reason, and to the NFL's credit, was you guys saw how relevant we were trying to make it for this YouTube generation. And again, you obviously saw the integration with things like destroying and Mr. Beast in the actual live stream of the game itself. But that sort of creator engagement through the lens of creators is something that sports leagues are leading to, which is sort of like what I describe as a new water cooler moment.
H
Host10:22
What percent of watched media minutes do you guys have, do you think? If you look at all media, broadcast, movies,
N
Neal Mohan10:29
I mean, you guys know we're
H
Host10:31
Netflix.
N
Neal Mohan10:31
We're the number one streaming platform here in the US. So, I think the latest Nielsen's number was, and we've been the number one streamer in the US here for 2 years. And I think the latest Nielsen number was something about roughly about 13, 14% of the TV watching audience. But remember, that number doesn't include YouTube on mobile.
H
Host10:55
I see. So, it's a television
N
Neal Mohan10:56
It's counting television.
H
Host10:57
But to Ari's point, do you see that growing? Are people spending more time consuming media because it's more personalized, it's more engaging, and they're finding perhaps more free time?
N
Neal Mohan11:07
I mean, I do, look, our numbers are growing. I think other streaming platforms are growing. Other mobile platforms are growing. I think if you look at the totality of human time, it's still a relatively small portion of that. Yeah.
D
David11:23
Let me shift gears to a different topic for a second. I think during COVID, there was a real sense that the censorship was out of control on social media, not just YouTube, but Twitter, Facebook, all of them. If you questioned the efficacy of vaccines or social distancing or even on topics like the trans agenda or climate change, there was a risk that you could be censored or shadow banned or demonetized. It feels like the industry's kind of pulled back from that and things have opened up again. And a lot of that's I think due to what Elon did in terms of buying Twitter and opening things back up. I guess my question is, has the industry actually learned from that or is censorship just on pause during the Trump years?
H
Host12:10
There's another fastball. I like it.
N
Neal Mohan12:12
I like it. I like it. All right. I like it. That's why I'm here.
H
Host12:15
It's a great question. Yeah.
N
Neal Mohan12:17
I think that actually I'll just say a couple things about that. And one of them will sound it's sort of actually connecting the dots between the questions that you guys asked, which is the way I answered David's question. First of all, I think a lot of these platforms are actually pretty different, right? Like what Twitter does is different than what some of the meta platforms do, which of course is very different than what YouTube does. And you could argue as witnessed from the rest of this conversation that we probably have a lot more similarity with a streaming platform than we do with a social media platform. So that's one point, but I think it's an important context into what I'm about to say. And the reason I say that is because 99% of what happens on YouTube is all the creators that I talked about, all the podcasters, the Taylor Swifts of the world, all the music, obviously. Music is our largest and most important vertical, for example. We're a music platform. So even during COVID, that is where a lot of the watch time on YouTube versus a discourse that might be happening in a social feed somewhere. That doesn't mean that we don't have comments on our videos and all that sort of piece, which is where some of this discourse that you're alluding to, David, might have happened. I do think that at the highest level, I do think that there is something about the fact that that was a very different time. I remember March, April of 2020 where like oh my god, like do you get this this way or is it this way or mask or this or I mean, I literally woke up one day and there were people climbing 5G cell towers and falling from cell towers because now it was like you could literally get the thing from cell towers or sound cell towers, but it sounds crazy today, but that was the nature of the types of things that were popping up on
D
David14:10
Lessons learned or regrets there?
N
Neal Mohan14:12
Let me just finish. So that's the context in which we were having to make some of these decisions. Fast forward to today, obviously a completely different world, but just in terms of the nature of the disease and all that sort of thing. So all of those policies that existed back then are non-existent today and it's my way of answering your question: is it a temporal thing or not? I would argue that a lot of these, and by the way, YouTube in particular was criticized to an extreme amount because of all the content that we left up on the platform around the Wuhan virus controversy, whatever. All sorts of other things that we were leaving up that other places were acting differently on. And so we got beat up a lot from one side of the spectrum then and I think that our approach really just has to be flexible to the environment and the context of it. I think we're always going to get criticized for being an open platform. There's a lot of magic that happens because of the open platform. All these amazing creators wouldn't exist if we didn't have an open platform and we didn't stand for free speech, but there's also a lot of abuse on it.
J
Jason15:31
Follow-up on this if I may. There are two categories that I have in my feed because of the algorithm, firearms and poker. Both of those groups of creators are a little bit up in arms, no pun intended, because they are being demonetized. So how do you make a decision on who's allowed to earn and who's not allowed to earn and be part of the ad network? Poker folks and people who do firearms safety and firearm training and best practices, they're demonetized and they're complaining about it. Now, how do you make those kind of decisions?
N
Neal Mohan16:05
A lot of them are incredibly successful creators on our platform, Jason.
J
Jason16:10
But not monetized.
N
Neal Mohan16:11
No. So, many of them are monetized as well. So we do have a clear set of rules and we've had these for a long time in terms of sales of firearms and those types of things and obviously there are legal frameworks and all those types of things around it. But I think, in terms of firearms community and learning about firearms and safety, which obviously is an important thing, especially for young people, we're one of the largest places where those audiences exist as well as monetization of that type of content. Now, the balance, and obviously some of this comes from experts that we've worked with in that vertical itself around something might be appropriate for an adult user of that type of content that may not be appropriate for a child and those types of things. So there's a lot of nuance behind it, but the poker, I don't, I mean, are we like there's probably something around sports gambling legality and all that sort of stuff, but generally speaking, as you guys know,
J
Jason17:09
Okay.
N
Neal Mohan17:10
There's an enormous amount of poker content that's incredibly successful on our platform. It's back to what Chamath was saying, which is like whatever niche there is out there, however big or however small, you're going to find a set of creators that are just as passionate about it as you are.
C
Chamath17:24
I think the interesting question is how do you organize yourself across all the different countries you're in and the scale that you're at to deal with the cultural nuances of every different country and then to deal with the laws of every different country and then to deal as David said sometimes the vicissitudes of social policy in every country. How do you deal with that organizationally? Like what does that actually look like?
N
Neal Mohan17:47
Yeah, it's the part that turns my hair white. But look, I think part of it, I say this to my team all the time, which is it is a challenge, right? Because we, but I think it's a challenge that honestly, like I view it as a bit of a privilege in the sense that it wouldn't be important if we weren't such an important place, especially for young people to connect, get information, entertain themselves, learning, we're the largest learning platform in the world, we know that, obviously, just given all the use cases and the watch time, etc. And so at least from my standpoint, I try to be as global as we possibly can in terms of principles. One of the things that I always say about YouTube is, our North Star principle has always been give everyone a voice and show them the world. That's our mission statement. It stands for freedom of expression, freedom of speech. We are an American company and that notion, that value of freedom of speech is core to our ethos and we really do try to start with that as a global position. Having said that, you're right, like there is an enormous
C
Chamath19:05
Patchwork of legislation and regulation that exists in every country? Are there people that are writing policies that then some folks just have to understand and they're manually trying to react to. Here's how we deal with this issue in India. Here's how we deal with this issue in Brazil. Here's how we deal with it in France.
N
Neal Mohan19:20
Yeah, I mean look, the answer is
C
Chamath19:22
Or is it algorithmic? Or is it a combination?
N
Neal Mohan19:24
It's always some combination because the scale of YouTube is hundreds of hours of content uploaded to YouTube every single minute of every single day. We want to be as core to that North Star as possible. And frankly, there are situations where we have to push back on that core, push back on what might be an encroachment on that principle. Having said that, we also, of course, have to legally operate in all of these countries just like any other platform.
H
Host19:59
There's three products, Neal, I'm super obsessed with and I just would love to get your take on them in terms of priorities for you. YouTube TV, unbelievable.
N
Neal Mohan20:08
Unbelievable.
H
Host20:09
YouTube Brad which I think is YouTube
N
Neal Mohan20:10
That is a great product.
H
Host20:11
YouTube Brad which I think is YouTube Premium taking the ads off, unbelievable. And then I think a sleeper is you've kind of built-in Patreon-like functionality subscriptions. So maybe you can walk us through the footprint of each of those and the prioritization of those because they do seem to have had a significant impact on engagement and how people look at the platform.
N
Neal Mohan20:31
Yeah, now I'm super proud of all three of those products as a product guy myself. That's the fun part of the job is actually building all of these amazing products. And the origin story on YouTube TV, I'm a sports nut. I'm and actually the people on my team, a lot of them who've been involved with YouTube TV since the very early days are also big sports guys. And I'm also a news junkie. And that's the core use case of YouTube TV in many ways. If you think about the features that we build, multi-view, key plays, even some of the fantasy integrations that you see. So that's the lens through which you should think about how we're going to continue to develop that product. And the thought and then the question I would always get is like, 'Well, why are you guys doing this? Look at what's happening to that part of the paid ecosystem, right? Why are you diving into this thing that's like this shrinking thing?' And our thought was like, 'Well, a lot of it has to do with the fact that reinventing that whole experience from the standpoint of a fan or a consumer. And so, that's the YouTube TV origin and where it's going. The one thing that you should pay attention to is something that we call Primetime Channels in YouTube, which is a lot of those same linear channels or traditional media channels, but that you can buy a la carte in the main YouTube app.'
H
Host21:57
Yeah.
N
Neal Mohan21:57
And so, there's connectivity between those two products.
H
Host22:01
Wondering when that would happen because for me it's just CNBC. I want to have it inside of YouTube, but I have to load it and then when I travel, it's always like, 'Oh, what region are you in?' Premium, how many premium subscribers are there now? How is that growing? How does that affect the ad business? Because for me, the ads are death. I need my time back. So, how do you think about that?
N
Neal Mohan22:21
Yeah. I do think that for our business, advertising is going to remain, is today and will remain the predominant way through which we monetize on behalf of creators at the 70 billion number that I mentioned. Most of it comes from ads and the reason is because at a fundamental level, we are a platform of scale. 2 billion people come to it every single day. Having said that, giving consumer choice, uninterrupted experience is important. There's about 125 million subscribers.
H
Host22:56
125 million?
N
Neal Mohan22:58
Paid YouTube Premium.
H
Host22:59
Amazing.
Yeah. How does that money get split with the creator? So, if I'm watching Mr. Beast without ads, how do you
N
Neal Mohan23:04
There's a kind of roughly engagement watch time type calculation that goes into it.
H
Host23:10
Basically the biggest cable subscriber base equivalent?
Are we, are you
N
Neal Mohan23:16
Yeah.
H
Host23:16
Yeah, what do you guys rank in cable subscribers?
N
Neal Mohan23:19
Actually, what's interesting the way that even the way you guys are talking about it is like, well, that's like your uninterrupted TV subscription tier, which is how I think lots of people think about it. The origin of YouTube Premium was actually a music premium music subscription service, right? It was called YouTube Music and Premium. And so, a lot of those 125 million subs are not just people who are watching it just the way that they would watch Netflix or Amazon without ads. There's a lot of that, but a lot of it is just actually music fans, too. Like, people for whom their music service is actually YouTube, right? Where they discover music, where they listen to or watch their favorite videos is YouTube. So, how do you have an uninterrupted music service?
H
Host24:01
When you have all these incredible AI models all over the place, people will be generating all kinds of content. Some of that content could be news content, topical content, it could talk about a vaccine, it could talk about whatever. Do you guys feel you have a responsibility to figure out whether that's real or not? Do you think that's the role of the actual creators? Do you think it should be, the CDC should have a YouTube channel where they watermark the stuff that they put out, and then, like, whose responsibility is this going to be?
N
Neal Mohan24:28
Yeah, I think that's
H
Host24:29
Much of it is our responsibility as a consumer?
N
Neal Mohan24:32
I mean, look, I think that here's how I think about it. First, with the growth of these AI enablement tools, you're going to see that the distinction between was it completely AI generated, was it AI assisted, et cetera, is going to be a continuum. So that's the first piece. And we're already seeing that. We see that on YouTube. Obviously, you open up the YouTube app, you hit that plus button, you can type in a text prompt and it will generate a video for you using our VO models, right? So that is already happening. One of the things that we do is there is a label that says hashtag AI generated. And we will put that, we call it sort of front of the box. We will literally put that on the video in some cases. Usually it's in the metadata. That's obviously not foolproof. But I think the way, at least from a principal standpoint, the way I think about it is, YouTube has these community guidelines. We try to be transparent about them. We publish them on our website. And I think that's sort of like an a priori distinction between, well, it was AI generated, therefore it must be violative versus not actually is not the way to do it. And it's really just about giving as much transparency to the users as possible. And then the other thing that's really important is in the creator business, in the creative creativity business, whether you're Hollywood celebrity or a YouTuber or an artist, the thing that I hear over and over that they really care about is their likeness. And so if you're Taylor Swift, it's your voice. If you're Marques Brownlee, it is your face. Like your likeness.
H
Host26:24
It's your
N
Neal Mohan26:24
No, I mean
H
Host26:25
Yeah.
N
Neal Mohan26:25
Yeah. There are people doing live Chamath things to give Bitcoin away and I send it to him and I report it sometimes.
H
Host26:31
It to Neil.
N
Neal Mohan26:31
Yeah, I send it [laughter] to Neil. And I'll tell you, the AI slop issue is getting bad because
H
Host26:36
Directly instead of tagging me.
N
Neal Mohan26:37
The
D
David26:39
No, the issue really is, I'm a Corvette fan and the incentive is so perverse. I've had to ban a bunch of these channels that show me thumbnails of this is the new Corvette. This is the new prototype and it's AI slop. And it's obvious what they're doing is they're trying to insert themselves into the algorithm and then I just banned them. So, you do give control, but I do think labeling them is important.
N
Neal Mohan27:05
Want to put the burden on you to do that. I think the labeling is one piece, but the thing that I was going to say is the other thing and we have a track record of Content ID, which is basically the rights management system
H
Host27:15
Yes.
N
Neal Mohan27:15
That you could argue basically created that whole creator economy in the first place.
H
Host27:19
YouTube success.
Saved YouTube.
N
Neal Mohan27:21
So, Content ID is
H
Host27:23
Think about that metaphor as it applies to AI.
N
Neal Mohan27:26
Yeah, wonderful.
So, we are working on this notion of I call it sort of likeness detection where if it's a Chamath face, the algorithm should be good enough to actually detect that and then give you a choice as to whether that should come down.
H
Host27:42
Right.
N
Neal Mohan27:43
Is that does that come down? Or, there might be some creators that choose to monetize it and give, so giving creators control is important.
H
Host27:49
Of it.
N
Neal Mohan27:50
You can take ownership of it.
H
Host27:51
So, people take our clips, make versions of us as dogs or something.
N
Neal Mohan27:54
And for us it's not just words. We actually have a track record of doing that because of something like Content ID.
H
Host28:00
Ladies and gentlemen, you'll know. You'll [applause] thanks for being here. Thanks brother. Appreciate it.
N
Neal Mohan28:07
Thank you. Yeah, yeah, of course. Yeah, yeah.