Back
Jorma Rauhala
President and CEO, Kesko

Onko yritysasiakkaissa Keskon herkkupaikka, pääjohtaja Jorma Rauhala?

🎥 Jul 21, 2025 📺 Karon Grilli ⏱ 57m 👁 3384 views
Keskon kiinnostus on tuntunut keskittyvän koko ajan enemmän yritysasiakaskauppaan. Se on ostanut pääosin ammattiasiakkaita palvelevia rautakauppoja ja panostanut ravintoloille ja keittiöille tuoretuotteita toimittavaan Kespro-tukkuun, eikä teknisen tukkukaupan yhtiön Onnisen ostostakaan järin kauaa ole. Viime vuonna Keskon liikevaihdosta jo 39 prosenttia tuli B2B:stä. Suurin osa, 46 prosenttia, koostui yhä tukkumyynnistä K-kauppiaille ja 15 prosenttia myynnistä suoraan kuluttajille. Onko yritysasiakaskaupassa Keskon herkkupaikka, pääjohtaja Jorma Rauhala? ”No kyllä se on." Päivittäistavar...
Watch on YouTube

About Jorma Rauhala

Jorma Rauhala, President and CEO of Kesko, commented on the company's second-quarter results in an interview published on July 22, 2026. He described the quarter as "strong," noting that the improvement in quarterly profit was the largest in over four years, driven primarily by the technical trade segment. Rauhala stated that Kesko gained market share significantly and highlighted a 20 million euro profit improvement in the building and building services technical wholesale business. Rauhala also discussed the integration of recent acquisitions, including the Dahl and Scoban businesses. He said the focus for these larger acquisitions is on separating them from their previous environments and ensuring IT systems and shared services function properly, rather than on cost synergies. Regarding outlook, Rauhala expressed a belief that the technical trade segment will continue to strengthen, though he noted that new housing sales in Finland have not yet picked up and are unlikely to impact the current year's results significantly. He added that international operations have been strong and that the company expects steady improvement across its segments.

Source: AI-verified profile updated from Jorma Rauhala's recent appearances. Browse all interviews →

Transcript (65 segments)
I
Interviewer0:00
We are talking about something. 4 billion, and if we have now 4.3, we are about 10% of that, so there is growth potential. This is Karo's Grill, with guest Jorma Rauhala, in cooperation with Kesko's CEO Jorma Rauhala. You have experience in both daily goods trade and then from the hardware and building technology trade. Which one shall we start the interview with today?
J
Jorma Rauhala0:30
Well, let's start in the order I started, i.e., over 30 years ago I went to the food side, let's start there. Well, let's start grilling then, because grills are indeed available from the hardware side, and also from the Citymarket side, but there you also get the contents for the grill, so what do you want to grill, carrot or sausage?
I
Interviewer0:53
In daily goods trade, Kesko's aim is to strengthen its market position. That usually means increasing market share. When you look at Kesko's market share in daily goods, it was about 20 years ago somewhere around 36%. From there it steadily declined, then we bought Suomen Lähikauppa and it rose back, and now it's about 34%. So is Kesko's daily goods trade just a leaky barrel? Or maybe a cognac demijohn from which a little alcohol evaporates every year?
J
Jorma Rauhala1:18
No, it's not exactly a leaky barrel, but indeed, over the last 10 years, maybe I've been following it closely, there have been different periods. One is certainly the purchase of Suomen Lähikauppa, when we gained market share. Then we gained in 2017, 2018, 2019, when our strengths of high-quality stores, wide selections, domestic products were valued. That's when we gained, not just because of the local store. Similarly, when Corona came, we reacted very quickly to e-commerce. Those were the good years. But over the last ten years, maybe about half the years we've gained and half we've lost. And that's true. In recent years, we've lost market share for a few years, and that's why we set the strategy to turn it around while maintaining good profitability. We have very clear measures to do that. I believe they will work. If you look at the table, how market share is won, first of all the decisive factor is location, and secondly it seems clearly that the hypermarket format is where the trade is going. That means we need to get more hypermarkets into growth centers. In the Helsinki metropolitan area, we have four in Helsinki, now Vuosaari K-Supermarket was upgraded to Citymarket. In Espoo there are two. We need to get more here, but also to other growth centers. We have announced seven new Citymarkets, three of which are completely new and four are changes like Lahti Paavola, the oldest Citymarket moving to new larger premises, or Vuosaari from supermarket to Citymarket. So growth centers more broadly, but certainly the capital region, for example Espoo, we have only two Citymarkets for a big city, and we are doing measures in Espoo center. But also supermarkets, we have a good portfolio. It depends on what kind of plot we find. Not everywhere can fit a hypermarket, so we have a good portfolio. To growth centers, it's a clear strategy. The migration in Finland looks quite dramatic, we have to be smart in the decisions we make.
I
Interviewer3:47
So concretely, how do you get, as you said, plots are not available everywhere, can we get hypermarket-sized, meaning Citymarket-sized stores in the Helsinki metropolitan area?
J
Jorma Rauhala4:00
Certainly in the capital region. For example, we have announced Kivistö in Vantaa, which will be in the capital region, and also the Espoo center transformation. But it's not easy. We often get messages that southern Helsinki should get a bigger store. I completely agree, but such plots don't exist. So as I said, we have flexibility. If there is an area that needs a store but can't fit a big one, we can make a smaller one. But in any case, we will get to enjoy the opening coffee of new stores.
I
Interviewer4:31
The grill is one year old today. Your predecessor Mikko Helander was here a year ago. Now we get coffee, luckily we already got it from the coffee machine. Yesterday from Kallio's K-Market came these gingerbread-flavored pastries, they were on promotion. But there's probably cake there too, usually when you're at a grocery store? Yes, but no mustard for this. This works so you can choose mustard to taste. Is that black one very spicy? Yes, it's spicy. This goes into Kesko's blood. And since I couldn't think of a nice mustard question, I know you're a skiing man. This isn't even available in Pirkka's bookcase, Pirkka Trendi, from the back of the Pirkka bookcase, and not yet in any store. In two weeks, Sami Jauhojärvi's life story will be published. Life stories are nice to read. But it probably also works as something to listen to on a ski trip. It's written that way. When I ski, I don't listen to anything. I listen to the sounds of nature and maybe my own breathing. Same with cycling, it's quite dangerous if you can't hear. So yes, and you are a mountain biker? Yes, I mostly ride on the road when I have the energy. In winter, the bike is on the trainer.
J
Jorma Rauhala5:47
That's right.
I
Interviewer6:00
Then, in strategy, you updated on the Defense Forces' Flag Day, or you gave some clarifications to the strategy. Kesko announced that its strategic goal for daily goods is to strengthen the price image. So the price image of K-stores is that they are the more expensive store. Isn't this a sensible thing to confirm that you are expensive?
J
Jorma Rauhala6:27
Well, the price image. In the grocery trade overall, these are very much, I've followed various statistics for over 20 years, so the price differences and price images between different operators have remained very similar. The price image for us is unfavorable, much more than the actual price difference. In the strategy, there are three things we do to turn the market share. First, the network issues are clear. We have invested quite little in recent years, we will make them, with a slight delay. So some help will come during this strategy period, but later. Then there is the price. We need to make certain investments in price, so that we compete better. When quality issues are prominent, but now that price has been very strong with consumers, we must also invest in it so that the consumer sees it's smart to shop in our stores. We will do that. But perhaps the most important is our core competitive advantage: strengthening the store-specific business concept and the quality of the store. So we strengthen our competitive advantage and slightly reduce the competitive disadvantage, i.e., price.
I
Interviewer7:41
Does the price investment mean that you sell a bit cheaper to the retailers? To customers, consumers? Yes, we will do that. And actually yesterday I just went through plans, I was very satisfied with what I saw, how it will be done. How will you also market it somewhat, not just a temporary price cut trick, but bring a clear message to the consumer that smart pricing decisions have been made, specifically for the consumer.
J
Jorma Rauhala8:09
It means that we will do it. And it's not just about individual campaign offers. Campaigns are very strong in our DNA and work, and we will keep them. Consumers appreciate that they get good campaigns and offers. But we will also bring changes related to the basic shopping basket, also regarding private labels.
I
Interviewer8:35
Actually, I was about to move to that. In many European countries, the share of discounters is a couple of tens of percent. In Germany, it's probably around 40% with Lidl and Aldi. In Finland, Lidl's market share is around 10%, then there are other discount stores like Tokmanni, Minimani. Then the share of private labels, I looked at, for example, if I could pronounce it, Carrefour wants to achieve 40% private label share. For you, it's probably around 20% in daily goods. Does that mean that Pirkka and Menu are just being brought in more? Menu is really very price competitive.
J
Jorma Rauhala9:23
Yes, if we consider the consumer side, we have Pirkka Parhaat, Pirkka, and K‑Menu, three different profiles. It's around 20%, with many changes. Then we must remember that on the Kespro side, the share of private label products is about 50%. But that is an interesting point. I see that especially in Pirkka and Pirkka Parhaat, we have more potential. They are very high-quality products, offering customers a good price-quality ratio. From our perspective, they are sensible, profitable products. It depends a lot on individual large products, like in recent years, if there are big changes in Pirkka, like Pirkka banana, Pirkka beer, Pirkka milk, those can change the share quite significantly. I see we have growth potential there, but not to 40%. At that point, the store changes quite a lot. Shelf space is limited, so something else has to go. And we see that one of our core strengths is the wide selection, diverse assortments with A-brands. We want to cooperate with A-brands, and that is precisely our agility in getting new products to the shelf quickly. So, yes, Pirkka and Pirkka Parhaat have growth potential, but not 40%, and we don't aim for that. We actually tried a concept a few years ago where the store was largely based on Pirkka, it looked quite nice, but it didn't work yet. Consumers still wanted A-brands.
I
Interviewer10:58
Yes, and that is also a differentiating factor, and of course with the food industry having good relations, it probably also brings opportunities for joint development.
J
Jorma Rauhala11:10
Yes, that's right.
I
Interviewer11:13
Now talking about price, then at the other end is probably service. Taken to the extreme, that's online grocery with home delivery. I saw that in the third quarter, online grocery grew by double digits, even though in absolute terms it's still quite small, around a few percent. But when we talk about market share tenths of a percent, it already starts to be felt. Has there been a change that Finns have started to order groceries home? That is, the option to pick up from the store or have it delivered to the door. Apparently, ordering has increased.
J
Jorma Rauhala11:55
Exactly that. And I can say that was perhaps one of the biggest surprises for me. When I had been in daily goods earlier, then the years in construction and building technology, and now starting this role and looking at daily goods more closely, it was one of the biggest surprises. For example, in this time, we talk about price being a key factor in consumer purchasing decisions, but at the same time there is this ease of shopping and living. The ordering, as you mentioned, this year we will make over 3 million deliveries. Not 3 million euros, but 3 million deliveries, and the average basket is well over 20 euros. That was a surprise and an eye-opening thing for me. It's about ease and convenience. I don't think that trend is going away. And regarding online grocery, I've followed it since the late 1990s and have been involved in launching a couple of different pilots at Kesko. I would say that today it's business as usual. We have 800 stores that offer online grocery services to the customer, with the traditional model: order today and generally delivered tomorrow, or you can pick it up on the way home from work, or from the store, or there are rapid deliveries. Everything is available, and the consumer makes the decision. It's no longer a question of whether Finnish retailers are awake to online grocery, as it was discussed in the media 10 years or less. In my opinion, we have found a really good concept for how we operate. However, store-picking is still the main method, even for the world's largest online grocer, Tesco. So we have store-picking, rapid deliveries are done from stores, and we also have an automated warehouse. It's growing slowly, I think the current trend is that it's gradually increasing, but mainly due to rapid deliveries.
I
Interviewer13:29
What about rapid delivery, i.e., the use of Wolt? There has been public discussion about how some restaurant entrepreneurs have been upset that when Wolt delivers, not only does the customer pay Wolt, but also the restaurant, in this case the store, pays Wolt. So if I order from a K-Market via Wolt to my door, the retailer has to cut into his own margin or pay Wolt protection money. How does that work?
J
Jorma Rauhala14:28
Let's say that our model works quite well. This is voluntary for the retailer. And I can say that retailers really want it. Especially in the K-Market segment, where we started, it has even saved some K-Markets by bringing so much additional sales and profit. It is profitable there, especially when the store is small, the collection time is short. Even the same staff, during a short break, can collect the products. Now we have added it to larger stores, supermarkets, and there the equation changes a bit, the collection routes become longer, and so on. But in my opinion, we are constantly developing it together with Wolt. Wolt develops how to do it better, and we look at how to do it more efficiently. But it's a concept that there has been a lot of willingness for. Ultimately, the consumer decides how it goes.
I
Interviewer15:23
Then, one new change since Mikko Helander's grilling last summer: stronger alcoholic beverages. Apparently, largely due to the wishes of retailers, they got onto store shelves. They haven't seemed to become a super hit yet.
J
Jorma Rauhala15:39
No, and we didn't expect that either. It has been a bit of a surprise for suppliers when we started asking for products with 8% red wine, which doesn't exist elsewhere. There are some products that naturally fit that type, but it has increased a bit as expected. Looking at the latest figures, it has brought additional sales, partly replacing sales from under 5.5% products, so a slight increase. But I think it also shows how well the store can handle it. We have almost 4,500 such products quickly in the assortment. If we go to the point where 15% or others come someday, the assortments will be extensive. In my opinion, this is a good demonstration that the store reacts quite quickly, and consumers will have significantly larger assortments if even stronger ones come.
I
Interviewer16:29
Which would be higher on the wish list: raising the alcohol limit to 15% or over-the-counter medicines?
J
Jorma Rauhala16:38
15% fits well with the context of grocery shopping, buying wine with your food. Yes, it's desirable. Yes, let's put that.
I
Interviewer16:50
Yes, so in the context of these gingerbread-flavored pastries, with glögi, now there might be some products that naturally go with it. And then there are the special rules about fermentation, whether you ferment yourself, there are many special rules in Finland.
J
Jorma Rauhala17:03
Yes.
I
Interviewer17:11
This PT business area also includes Kespro, which is like an old cash-and-carry, serving restaurants, cafeterias, etc. And in practice, nowadays it's that the network orders and then it's delivered to the restaurant's door, apparently quite quickly. If you order in the evening, you might get salad supplies the next morning. There are still 13 cash-and-carry locations, but it's good to mention that my first job was at a K‑Cash & Carry in Vaasa in '92, so it's a familiar place. But it's exactly that the share of delivery sales has grown a lot. Is the nearest cash-and-carry in Lahti from Helsinki? That's a good question, I haven't been there recently. But it illustrates the shift to online.
J
Jorma Rauhala17:58
Yes, there were more, I remember when I started 25 years ago, there were 13. Now there are 13. Kotka might still be there. But Lahti is quite close. Kespro's share of Kesko's daily goods is about a fifth, and its market share is about half in its own limited segment. This is probably scale business, so the scale advantage comes in. That's exactly right, as in many other B2B trades. If you calculate the market share of these wholesale stores, it's about that. Additionally, there are direct deliveries from industry and specialized wholesalers. But if you look at traditional wholesale players, it's about that. So when you have a large customer base, you can maintain a wide, good assortment, and your availability and delivery reliability, delivery routes to, say, Lapland in Northern Finland, we have a very good one. There is a certain synergy with the stores as well. It's a volume business. It competes a bit with the K‑retailers, for example, if a restaurant has the option to get the salad supplies at a good discount from a nearby K‑store, or order them from Kespro by van. I don't know, I remember when I was at Kespro, a certain percentage of customers also shopped at daily goods stores, but it's not a topic of discussion that it's a problem. But overall, restaurants and stores have been converging over the years. Today, stores offer high-quality ready meals, sushi, etc., so they have converged.
I
Interviewer19:49
And this seems like a really good spot for the food service side. But it's probably not possible to internationalize that way because it requires large volume.
J
Jorma Rauhala20:01
Yes, that's true. It has been considered sometimes, but it would definitely be through acquisitions. Greenfield, going to some country and setting up a warehouse, is impossible. It has been considered, but it's not on our agenda currently. For food, we have decided to stay in Finland. We have been in the Baltics and Russia, but Finland is the area for the entire B2B, both grocery stores and Kespro.
I
Interviewer20:30
Yes, let's move outside Finland to the construction and building technology trade. Actually, similar to how Kespro is in B2B sales, the construction and building technology trade abroad, especially, is like that. There is Onninen, which is a wholesaler, and also the hardware stores, they sell mostly to business customers.
J
Jorma Rauhala20:59
Yes, that's right.
I
Interviewer21:04
Is this the sweet spot for Kesko?
J
Jorma Rauhala21:07
Yes, it is. If we think about construction and building technology, which now consists of us, it can be a bit of a difficult term but it's the hardware store side. In Finland, it's easy: K‑Rauta and K‑Rauta also has a strong consumer side. Abroad, we have more professional customers. Then there is the technical wholesale trade, which often divides into electrical and plumbing lines, roughly. Some operators work only in one, but Onninen in Finland is very strong in both. So in our clear strategy, the countries we have chosen, we operate in eight countries. For example, in Poland, we are only in technical wholesale. But we see that construction is moving towards B2B trade, all the requirements like digitalization and green transition regulations, etc. Few people build their own house anymore, and also renovation is moving to the B2B side, which is clearly part of our strategy. We only buy companies that operate there. We look at one country at a time. For example, Denmark most recently, we went in with the purchase of Davidsen, and now we have announced three more. And there are large markets. Just looking at the Nordic countries, it's a clear strategy where we seek growth.
I
Interviewer22:32
Yes, so Denmark a year ago, we talked with Mikko Helander about this Davidsen deal that was then being realized. Now in mid-August, you announced three complementary ones, which were indeed expected. With these deals, the hardware business in Denmark will rise to over a billion euros? Probably yes, though the market has been weak in recent years. But it is so. I was involved in many of these, especially in Davidsen and the later ones, and I can say it went quite well. Davidsen was only in southern Denmark, and through acquisitions we got a few individual stores elsewhere, but we saw that we weren't satisfied. So we sent a message to the market that we are interested in buying, and it was quite effective, we got the message across in Denmark, and through that we quickly got contacts to the next targets. And it went well, so after these, when they are consolidated next year, we will have all of Denmark covered, and it will rise to around 800-900 million euros. And then the market will surely start growing, and we will be number two or three in the market. So it was quite fast to get a new country under control, and a market share of around 20% is enough to achieve scale, because these are all scale businesses. This will actually surpass Norway as a hardware country, becoming the second largest hardware country after Finland, if you include technical wholesale. And that's the point: the volume is sufficient. Are there more acquisitions? Yes, it's possible, but not necessary. It's more about if a single store or something comes along. As it gets bigger, competition law might become a bit more difficult for acquisitions, but the volume is sufficient. The important thing is that we can serve nationwide customers, like nationwide construction companies, with deliveries from all over.
I noticed in the press release that these new acquisition targets are specifically B2B, serving business customers. Does that mean that now you can also expand the technical wholesale, i.e., Onninen, through these hardware stores?
J
Jorma Rauhala24:58
No, that's a separate story. One lesson learned from 2018, when I started, is that you should not mix hardware and technical wholesale. They are different markets, different customers, even though it's all construction. The good operators are different, the competitors are completely different. So technical wholesale in Denmark is certainly interesting, but that would be with the players in that sector. However, individual products can be added to the hardware stores, but it's such that an electrical contractor wants to deal with a professional wholesaler focused on electrical contracting. In Finland, some K‑Rauta and Onninen are in the same location, but that was just an initial experiment, and we haven't decided to increase that. Even if they are close to each other, it doesn't matter, but the essential thing is that they are different businesses.
I
Interviewer26:03
Looking at Kesko's RT (construction and building technology) map, now in Denmark the hardware side is sufficiently large. Elsewhere, it feels like there is room for growth, especially through acquisitions, especially in Sweden, where the market share is quite small. So have you sent a message to Sweden as well?
J
Jorma Rauhala26:27
Yes, it's exactly that. If we look at our target countries where we operate, and look at technical wholesale and hardware, and look at the market size, we're talking about something like 4 billion, and if we have now 4.3, we're about 10% of that, so there is growth potential. But certainly, for example, Sweden, we need growth on both sides, hardware and technical wholesale, and acquisitions are the only way to get sufficient scale. And there, the targets would preferably be a bit larger rather than smaller. There aren't an insane number of them, but there are, and many are known, or all are known, some are known. But it's clear that if we were to put something on a wish list for where the next significant acquisitions would be, I would see Sweden there. Then there is also the Baltics and Kesko Senukai, half of which is owned by Lithuanian businessman Artyras Rakauskas, a name that has become familiar because of arbitration. I read a news article that Kesko Senukai might be buying Ray Bank? But that seems to be Rakauskas's own business, not related to our company acquisitions. What's the situation now? It's pretty much the same. The essential thing is that the business is working. It shows in our figures. How Kesko Senukai appears, it no longer appears in our sales figures because it was divested around 2020, so about a billion euros of sales left, but the profit comes to us. The essential thing is that the business is working, and we have a very systematic and regular approach.
Board cooperation together with Arturaksen and the colleagues there, and it works, and there have been some slightly different views on management strategy, but that hasn't caused any change. As I said, the essential thing is that business is going and profits are coming. As a layman, one might think that everything would work better if the owners were unanimous. It's always better, and we don't have terribly big disagreements. They will be resolved in time. It's not a major problem at the moment. So, it's good to believe that. On the other hand, it's nice that the billion-euro business from there fits quite well with Kesko. However, Onninen has operations in the Baltics, and the hardware store business there is fully owned. We are satisfied with that.
Then thirdly, it's always easy to forget, but there is the car business. In Finland, the market share currently... What is it roughly? Well, the market share there has three areas: new cars, used cars, and services. Especially services, you can't really calculate that. Used cars are not really relevant because it's so much consumer-to-consumer trade. I don't remember the exact market share for new cars. The important thing is that we work with Volkswagen, Porsche, Audi, and such. The key is that we have a good portfolio. We have been quite focused on new cars, but in recent years, and this year as well, we have increased focus on used cars and services. Organic growth there is easier because opening a new used car dealership is much easier than a grocery store. We have examples like in Pori, where we find a suitable property, whether it's an old furniture store or something, and you can fairly easily set up a car dealership compared to a Citymarket that took 30 years to get in Porvoo. I remember when I started as CEO of Ruokakesko in 2013, we visited Porvoo, and it was on the agenda then, and colleagues had been working on it for ten years before that. But the essential thing in cars is this portfolio: new cars, used cars, and services, and we are growing well in them. In new cars, the market share is largely dependent on how the principal, like Audi or Volkswagen, brings new models. Early this year, the market was weaker, but currently it's better. So it differs in nature.
I
Interviewer31:07
Well, you just talked about starting a new store. On the other hand, it also means the barrier to entry is quite low. There are many local entrepreneurs who can start a car dealership. In recent years, there has been a lot of consolidation, and even a couple of companies focused on used car sales have gone public. But it differs in nature from how all other Kesko operations are described. Growth really has to come through acquisitions, especially on the building and technical trade side internationally.
J
Jorma Rauhala31:33
Growth through acquisitions is especially clear for the building and technical trade side. Of course, we also seek other growth. In grocery trade, when operating in Finland, it's practically impossible to enter new areas organically. But in car trade, both are possible. Just at the end of the summer, we acquired Lohja Car Dealership. So in car trade, it's possible to grow both through acquisitions and other means. So there are clear differences between these business areas. But also, grocery and car trade are in Finland, while building and technical trade seek growth especially abroad.
So there are clear differences between these business areas. But also, grocery and car trade are in Finland, while building and technical trade seek growth especially abroad. If you think about Kesko, it has these three parts, all of which are strategic for you now, and apparently also the sports part within car trade, at least for now. But is there any other synergy or organic connection between them besides the fact that the headquarters is in Kalasatama?
I
Interviewer32:30
But is there any other synergy or organic connection between them besides the fact that the headquarters is in Kalasatama?
J
Jorma Rauhala32:40
That's a good question. Yes, the way it is, there isn't a huge amount of synergy between the business areas. Of course, there are some things like going under the K-brand overall, using the Plussa loyalty system, or for example, the new growing business of car charging is K-Auto's business, and they can sell charging equipment and install them in Citymarket and supermarket parking lots. The car principals are often surprised to see that. But we don't force it. We try to look at certain IT systems, cybersecurity, and finance, but we are very careful to see where there is synergy. If not, we don't force it. Often, when we buy a hardware store abroad, it has its own ERP system. It's more about looking for synergy between Davidsen and Byggmakker or PK Pyykkö within the same business area, rather than trying to force the grocery ERP into Denmark. So there is some synergy, but limited.
As for the building and technical trade, it seems to work well as country organizations. Yes, it's surprisingly local business. Actually, many are like that even in grocery. A couple of years ago, I was at a seminar in Japan, and it was interesting: the CEO of Walmart said that their lesson is country-specific strategies. I thought, yes, because that has been my point, especially in building and technical trade. I learned that quickly, even though it was a new industry for me when I started in 2018. Then I visited others and noticed that it's its own thing. In Norway, Byggmakker in Lillehammer isn't terribly interested in what's done in Finland. The local market in hardware is very, very local, but also in technical wholesale. And even though suppliers are global, they have country-specific organizations, country-specific terms, and price levels vary by country. That's one key lesson. Of course, we constantly seek synergies within the business area, but the starting point is that customers are local, and it's local business. We respect that, operate on its terms, and then see if there is synergy somewhere.
So where do we find synergy? What is the benefit of Kesko being a hardware operator in Northern Europe? Today, for example, we have the building and technical trade management team here, and we go through things together. Of course, there is synergy, for example, in procurement. We start with each supplier, if they are global, we start with the idea that we procure together, make agreements with the supplier, but then very often we look locally at the local situations. For example, in IT systems, Byggmakker now has the same system as Davidsen had, and actually the three acquisition targets also have the same system. So we start to find things to do together in concept development, trying to learn from each other without forcing. We don't say from Finland, 'Here's a good concept, take it,' but rather offer it on a platter, learning from each other. 'Hey, this could work there with private labels.' Yes, there are such things. And of course, the bigger we grow, the more of those will come. And we become a more relevant player for suppliers.
I
Interviewer36:31
I also need to ask, because I understand that the efficiency you're looking for from the supplier side is essentially fine-tuning. So you get a slightly better deal when you're a customer for the whole of Scandinavia? I would say so, yes.
J
Jorma Rauhala36:47
I would say so, yes. But for example, Denmark is essential. Davidsen has been there, and they have certain purchasing terms. Of course, we immediately went through what synergies exist, and we updated agreements with our other countries. But now, when these three next targets come, it will be a completely new playing field when we negotiate with doubled local volume.
One way to expand, besides acquisitions, would be the franchising model. In Finland, grocery trade is franchising, as is K-Auto, where the entrepreneur buys the concept. Has that been considered abroad? No, it hasn't. We do have some entrepreneur dealers in Byggmakker in Norway still. It has varied over the years. Now, about 70% is our own business, but there are still dealers, and that works fine. But it's not in the plans. Especially if we look at technical wholesale, it's very different. Hardware is still largely store-based, while technical wholesale is largely based on centralized automated warehouses. In that case, it's harder for the dealer to add value. When large nationwide customers are served through electronic ordering systems from a central warehouse, it's harder to add value. In local hardware stores, there is more value. In Finland, our model works very well with K-Rauta stores, which are very agile in their regions and serve local entrepreneurs. But abroad, it hasn't been considered. And generally, the more it's B2B business, the less there is to gain from the dealer model, just like Kespro is not a dealer model but run by Kesko. In consumer business, of course, the dealer's own innovation is harnessed for the benefit of the whole group.
Yes, that's exactly it. It's clear that when it comes to grocery, it's almost our competitive advantage. A colleague once said that our model makes it possible for a store to be the best in the world. One Citymarket was chosen as the best in the world a few years ago. Regular monthly store awards come from an international organization. Just last month, one came. Our model enables it, but doesn't guarantee it. It enables it, but then it's up to the dealer to get the most out of it. There is variation, but there are excellent ones. So Kesko not only allows but also encourages and requires dealers to innovate. That's essential. It's not that the dealer has no freedom. We have a certain centralized assortment, but after that, thousands of products, 10,000 items, the store can choose itself. And they have done so, but it's also required that the store-specific differentiation is visible as a competitive advantage.
I
Interviewer40:09
We talked about the synergy between the three business areas being quite limited. I think of Kesko's stock as an investment product. To me, it appears as a defensive grocery side that aims to provide stable cash flow through the cycle, and a more cyclical building and technical trade component that may also offer above-cycle growth. Do all international investors necessarily understand this well? Does Kesko's value come through in the best possible way when it's a bit of a complicated contraption? It would always be nicer if it were just a factory producing one single widget.
J
Jorma Rauhala40:52
That's a good question. If we think about Kesko's history, even recent history, in 2005-2015, significant strategic decisions were made. Then we divested and gave up department store, agricultural, machinery, and boat businesses, and ended up with these three business areas. The building and technical trade has changed somewhat, but we focused on these three. But I have to admit, when I meet investors, and I'm going to Paris this weekend to meet them again, some ask why you have this kind of structure. So I have to explain it well, especially the building and technical trade, what it includes. But from a growth perspective, if we think about grocery, it's limited in Finland. How big can it be? We are the number one in food service and number two in consumer. Growth comes mainly from how Finland grows. There are not many great success stories in grocery going abroad, not for anyone else either. It's not an easy path. Building and technical trade has worked, and maybe it's a more natural path. So, we need these business areas to grow and become a better investment. But I often encounter this question and have to explain why. The car trade often comes up. But I just have to explain the logic. Also, we don't claim that there is huge synergy between them. There are some, but I think it's better to be honest about the situation. I personally think of the car trade as something that if Kesko needs to make larger inorganic growth at some point, it could be sold. It's a bit like companies used to own their headquarters as a cash reserve. But I hope Kesko doesn't end up in that situation.
I often encounter this question and have to explain why. The car trade often comes up. But I just have to explain the logic. Also, we don't claim that there is huge synergy between them. There are some, but I think it's better to be honest about the situation. I personally think of the car trade as something that if Kesko needs to make larger inorganic growth at some point, it could be sold. It's a bit like companies used to own their headquarters as a cash reserve. But I hope Kesko doesn't end up in that situation. Now, this spring, when I started, it was agreed with the board that we won't start thinking about portfolio strategy, but rather how to perform better in these businesses. But of course, from time to time, such deliberations must be made, and they have been made over the past ten years. All kinds of other businesses have been considered. And we must note that even in grocery, there are alcohol products, pharmacy products, and we have media and data sales that have grown very large. In car trade, we have charging business. So even without acquisitions, it's possible to grow with new things that are strongly linked to existing operations.
I
Interviewer43:50
But isn't the grocery media business essentially negotiating with suppliers or brand owners whether it comes as a cheaper purchase term or whether they buy an ad?
J
Jorma Rauhala44:06
Well, it has changed quite a bit. If we go back a few years, to get the grocery store to run, you needed a double-page spread in a big media and a coffee campaign, cinnamon rolls, etc. But we know that print media usage has decreased so much that we now use digital channels to reach customers. We have very good tools, the store itself where the decision is often made, digital screens, and our K-Ruoka app. It's an interesting and growing business that makes a profit. The logic is that if Pogen's gifflars are on offer, Pogen pays us for that. This was discussed at the international Consumer Forum seminar in June, where the biggest global FMCG suppliers and retailers gather. If you summarize the three or four day seminar, the key topics were generative AI and retail media. Those are the things that come up every year. And we are very far along in those.
I
Interviewer45:31
But tell me about generative AI, since you mentioned it. What were the three bullet points that came to your notes?
J
Jorma Rauhala45:41
Well, what came to my notes was that we need to do a more thorough review. That strategy work was started this fall, and we are going through it. The first interim reports are in. We have input from various experts. Actually, we are quite far along, but we will probably have it ready after the turn of the year. Where we are using it most now is in building grocery store assortments. We have very good customer data, and we can show dealers, for example, 'Hey, in your store, you should remove these products and add these, because based on the data from similar stores with similar customer profiles, these would work.' That's a concrete example where we get more sales, reduce waste, etc. There are many other areas, especially in e-commerce across all business areas, product information, etc. In Poland, at Onninen, we launched a Ukrainian-language e-commerce site with hundreds of thousands of products in a few months. That would not have been possible with old tools. The key is what I expect from the strategy: when we did one marketing campaign in grocery 90% cheaper than traditional methods, and in my role, I want to find where it brings cost savings and where it brings customer benefits. These things are emerging. Then we have to decide that if we see that using AI makes a process this much more efficient, then it can no longer be optional. Management must decide that we do this. So that's the kind of thing we are going through, and we'll have results early next year.
I
Interviewer48:59
Second question. I was about to ask before I went off on a tangent. When you go to international investors, you sometimes have to explain this division of three business areas, or two plus one. How often do you have to explain why Kesko seems to deliberately push down its own stock price by having two share classes that show that there are the dealers, even though it's no longer called the dealer share for the A share? It reminds you forever of the dealers' cooperative. Do you have to explain that?
J
Jorma Rauhala49:36
Well, I'll be honest. I've been traveling internationally quite a bit, and today there are visitors coming to the campus, and I have never been asked. Don't they notice that the A shares are traded? Probably they do. The dealers' association owns about 7.5% of Kesko's shares, but it hasn't come up. But I think the two share classes specifically remind that there are two tiers of people. They are both listed, yes. But it's more of an image thing. I myself am happy because I do arbitrage trading. When the prices fluctuate a bit, I take a euro here and there. But you, as a pulse taker, remember that FIM suggested merging the share classes 15 years ago, but it didn't pass at the general meeting. Is this even discussed? Actually, no, not during my time as CEO. It hasn't been on our agenda. In principle, there could be an option like Orion has, to exchange the more voting shares for less voting ones, but if it's not on the agenda, then it doesn't need to be discussed.
I
Interviewer50:57
I always get excited about the discussion, but I still have to take the last question. I won't ask what kind of grill you have, because Mikko Helander said his is much better than mine. But let's find out what kind of investor you are. You can choose the question yourself and then answer it. You can read whatever you want. What stock investment do you regret the most? Oh, don't answer Kesko. It has done very well during your time.
J
Jorma Rauhala51:28
Well, actually, I haven't been a very active stock investor. Now I plan to become more active. I bought some stocks about 20 years ago, and I was more focused on paying off the mortgage than stock investments. Of course, I have a reasonable amount of Kesko shares. But the amounts in other stocks are so small that I haven't really regretted anything. I looked the other day at some domestic stocks I bought 20 years ago, and one or two have a lower value now than then, but the investments were only a few hundred euros, so I don't really regret anything. Kesko's dividends cover the losses.
I
Interviewer52:15
Well, thank you very much, Jorma Rauhala, for being with us. The dividend actually decreased a bit last year, but it was still quite good, over a euro. I remember when I bought Kesko, the dividend was a euro then, and since then there have been splits. It has worked well. Thank you again, Jorma Rauhala. Thank you. Next up is Karo's grill.
Well, it's quite clear that expansion must be done through acquisitions. Organic growth abroad is small compared to Kesko's ambitions. The ideal situation is the opportunity to grow, if not through competitive advantage, then at least within the chosen strategy. For example, in Sweden, there is certainly cash flow that can be used for growth. It's clear that Kesko's strategy emphasizes growth. In Finnish grocery, it's hard to get any growth above general consumption, close to GDP growth. Kesko has excellent efficiency. I was thinking about the same thing as in the Sampo episode a few weeks ago: are the Nordic countries a kind of paradise where both property insurance and grocery can achieve exceptionally high profit margins? Is that sustainable? Well, Kesko has shown that it can be. And the building and technical trade, I think there should be more opportunities for synergies and thus improving profitability. I understand that Finland is very profitable because the market share is so high, but in areas with lower market share, it's harder, like in Denmark. That will become interesting. But I like Kesko's profile. I have been a shareholder continuously since 1999. Wait, today is the grill's one-year anniversary, and now it's my 25th anniversary of owning Kesko. Plenty of reason to celebrate. Indeed, back then the dividend was a euro and the stock price was about ten euros. Since then, there have been splits, and the dividend is still a euro, but now you get more shares. After Mikko Helander's visit, I actually bought more Kesko when Jorma Rauhala started, and the stock price fell last spring. I added a couple of times, and now the stock is around 20. With the latest profit guidance update, Kesko always gives a range for operating profit. In the third quarter, they usually narrow the range. Last year, they lowered the upper end, but now it was the opposite, so the average of the range increased, which led to a stock price increase. So, what I saw a year ago when I rewatched the old episode, I should remember to put links there. There is also background material that wasn't covered in this episode. I tried to cover different things. So, is there still room for improvement? Yes, it seems so. I believe that especially on the building and technical trade side, the weak market cycle has been handled well by Kesko. At least at the division level, I don't know country by country, but in terms of profit, by improving own operations and managing inventory. But when market growth inevitably starts, construction doesn't stop, so Kesko starts from good positions. Onninen is a very good business in Norway, and they also have the electrics side there, not the plumbing. And now the Danish hardware side looks quite nice. But why am I convincing myself? I already own the stock. This was Karo's grill, the grill master Karo Hämäläinen. The grill was built by Illegal Vision, and the chefs were Henrik Koivisto and Olli Jalkanen.