Back
Joost Farwerck
CEO and Chairman of the Board of Management, Koninklijke KPN

KKPNY Stock | Koninklijke KPN NV Q3 2021 Earnings Call

🎥 Oct 28, 2021 📺 AlphaStreet ⏱ 57m 👁 20 views
Access earnings conference call transcripts at: https://news.alphastreet.com/earnings... Earnings Infographics: https://news.alphastreet.com/infograp... Earnings Calendar: https://news.alphastreet.com/earnings... CEO Interviews: https://news.alphastreet.com/interviews/ Listen on: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast... https://anchor.fm/earningspodcast/ https://open.spotify.com/show/67gyUX6... https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0... https://radiopublic.com/the-earnings-... Follow us on:   / alphst_live     / _alphastreet     / alphastreetinc     / alphastreet   http://www.google.com/news...
Watch on YouTube

About Joost Farwerck

During the third quarter of 2021, Farwerck stated that KPN's results showed "another important proof point of our strategic progress," with mass market service revenue growth visible in all segments. He noted the company had "nearly completed" a 200 million euro share buyback program, which he described as "the first step to structurally return additional capital to our shareholders in the coming years." Farwerck also said KPN and Glaspoort planned to jointly reach 80 percent of Dutch households by the end of 2026, after which capital expenditure would come down. In a July 2021 interview, Farwerck discussed KPN's security operations, stating that the company faces "five to ten thousand attempts per day to get into our systems." He described KPN as "a very healthy company" investing "a billion euros per year in the Netherlands" and said the company aims to do more than just make money, seeking to give back to society. Earlier, in July 2020, Farwerck reiterated KPN's commitment to its 2020 outlook, stating that the company's dividend of 13 cents per share was "cast in stone" and that it would be "a shame to pause" capital expenditure given the value creation it enables.

Source: AI-verified profile updated from Joost Farwerck's recent appearances. Browse all interviews →

Transcript (59 segments)
O
Operator0:00
I'll head over to our CEO Joost Farwerck.
J
Joost Farwerck0:05
Thank you, Rhinos, and good afternoon everyone. Today's results show another important proof point of our strategic progress. Mass market service revenues grew again in the third quarter, supporting service revenue growth for the group as a whole. And this time, growth was visible in all our mass market segments, most notably in the SME segment. We delivered service revenue growth in SME ahead of our commitment to stabilize the four-year out, and this is an important milestone for us as it provides confidence to deliver the turnaround for the entire business segment during our current strategic period. We've seen strong momentum of mobile inflow in recent quarters, and this accelerated further to 67,000 net adds across consumer and business this quarter. Consumer mobile service revenues continue to grow, supported by strong performance of our unlimited propositions. And with solid adjusted EBITDA growth in the third quarter and a strong year-to-date free cash flow, we remain on track and confident that we will deliver on our full year 2021 outlook. At the second quarter results, we announced the 200 million share buyback, reflecting our confidence in the successful execution of our strategy, and we've nearly completed this share buyback program, which we see as the first step to structurally return additional capital to our shareholders in the coming years. We continue to make good progress against the strategic and financial ambitions of our strategy 'Accelerate to Grow,' and we remain confident that the strategy will create long-term sustainable value for all our stakeholders.
We rolled out fiber to 93,000 households in the third quarter, a figure slightly lower than other quarters as a result of the August holiday period. This year we've rolled out to 313,000 homes, and over the last 12 months we have added 424,000 homes. We continue to successfully add new fiber customers and upgrade existing copper customers in fiber areas. This will be a key driver for sustainable revenue growth. The joint venture Glassport is now fully up and running and has recently started its wholesale broadband access services for wholesale providers. Together with Glassport, we're going to jointly reach 80% of Dutch households by the end of 2026, and after reaching that point, capex will come down to a lower, more sustainable level. After returning to growth in the second quarter, we've been able to show continued growth in mobile service revenues this quarter, and this was mainly driven by an acceleration of the commercial performance of the last quarter and the higher ARPU level. Fixed mobile revenues increased 3.5%, and total consumer service revenues grew slightly by 2 million euros. Customer satisfaction remains one of our top priorities, and the progress in the last two quarters has been encouraging. Following a few tougher quarters, it's been pleasing to see our efforts in this area are paying off. NPS recovered strongly to plus 15, and this is a reflection of the success of our attractive KPN and Simyo lineup, the quality of our products and services, and the customer journey improvements in several areas such as customers moving into new homes, complementary fiber upgrades of copper customers in fiber areas, and the new KPN Wi-Fi Manager we introduced for our customers.
Now let's take a deeper look into our consumer KPIs. Broadband net adds were again relatively stable this quarter. Within the mix, we see a positive inflow on our KPN brand. This was supported by solid fiber inflow, which level was seasonally lower at 36,000 fiber households but fully in line with our expectations. Fiber ARPU remains significantly higher compared to copper due to the take-up of higher speeds, more value-added services, and more SIMs per household. And importantly, for the first time, our fiber service revenue growth was higher than the copper decline. We've delivered 27,000 postpaid net adds in the third quarter in consumer markets, and together with 1.7% higher postpaid ARPU, this led to mobile service revenue growth of 2.4%.
Let's now move to the B2B segments. This year we started to run the business segment by focusing on three distinct customer segments: SME, LCE, and Tailored Solutions. At our strategy update last November, we committed to stabilization of SME service revenues by the end of this year, and we've delivered on that commitment well ahead of plan, driven by solid commercial momentum in both broadband and mobile. This was the main driver for the improvement in the business service revenue trend to a decline of 2.7% year-on-year, compared to a level of around minus 5% in previous quarters. The performance in LCE and Tailored Solutions was aligned with our expectations, and as we highlighted earlier, it will take us some more time than SME to deliver the turnaround there. Business NPS remained at a positive level of plus 3, as customers continue to value KPN for the stability, reliability, and quality of our networks and services.
Let's dive a little bit deeper into the drivers of the SME turnaround. Our strong focus on acquiring new and retaining existing customers by migrating to KPN 1 is paying off with solid base trends. This in turn provides a strong platform to increase density of product take-up by our customers as we leverage up- and cross-sell opportunities. Looking at the revenue development of the three product groups within SME, we can conclude the following: we see healthy broadband base developments, also supported by fiber and self-employed inflow, and this resulted in strong growth of broadband and network service revenues. The mobile market remains competitive, resulting in continued price pressure. However, strong inflow of new mobile customers, among others driven by unlimited, is now offsetting that effect, and this led to stabilization of mobile service revenues in SME in the third quarter, an improving trend compared to minus 11% in Q1 and minus 4% in Q2. And finally, in fixed voice, the pace of the decline here moderated from around minus 20% to approximately minus 10%, and this is partly due to the annualization of the phase-out of ICN-2 last year, which reduced the year-on-year headwinds. All in all, good performance in SME, which gives me confidence that we will also deliver a similar turnaround in LCE and Tailored Solutions, the other parts of B2B.
In wholesale, revenues increased by more than 7% in the third quarter, supported by our successful open access policy. In mobile, we added 33,000 customers, and that's making total postpaid growth for the group, including consumer and B2B, of 100,000 this quarter. Wholesale providers continue to strongly outperform the two incumbents in terms of broadband base growth. In this third quarter, 18,000 broadband lines were added, reflecting the attractive access terms we offer to service providers. Recently, we entered into several long-term agreements with some of the larger broadband service providers in the Dutch market. ACM is currently conducting its fixed access review, and we strongly believe that we are operating a highly competitive market, and with our open wholesale access model, we guarantee sufficient room for wholesale providers to grow and to compete. And customers in the Dutch market get high-quality services, can easily switch, and choose from a wide range of service providers that offer value for money. Now over to Chris for our financial performance.
C
Chris8:38
Financial performance of KPN. Well, overall I'm pleased with the development of our key financial metrics this quarter. Let me start by summarizing some of these. Our adjusted revenues increased 1% year-on-year, supported by growth in mass market service revenues. Our adjusted EBITDA after leases increased 1.4% at a margin of 46.3% for the quarter, despite the tough comparison base in terms of opex. Free cash flow was more or less flat year-on-year in Q3. Year-to-date, however, our free cash flow increased 7.1% despite higher capex and taxes paid. Our indirect cost savings run rate this quarter was impacted by several factors. First, the comparable base for the third quarter last year was a tough benchmark to beat this quarter, so this quarter year-on-year is not a good proxy for a normalized run rate. Second, we continue to see some less tailwind from COVID-related savings. And finally, some other elements affected our staff cost performance this quarter, certainly when compared to last year. These include our recent CLA increase, donations to employee-related provisions, lower capex charging, and importantly, large restructurings in B2B and TDO. These were effectuated as of the 1st of October, with the full impact visible in Q4, not in Q3. If we look through these specific effects, we see a continued and structural decline in our cost base. This is evidenced by the continued decline of FTEs employed at KPN. For example, our own employee numbers are now significantly and structurally lower, even below 9,800, where we started with 10,100 at the beginning of the year. Our total staff – own staff and third-party staff – is now 30% lower than Q1 2020, for example, as testimony to our continuous restructuring and structural cost improvements. We expect to pick up the pace of our reported cost savings run rate by Q4 this year, which together with our mass market service revenue performance will drive EBITDA growth well into 2022.
Finally, please note that our capex spend is well under control. Fiber spend is up as we plan to do, and non-fiber capex is down through the last years, testimony to our enhanced capex vigilance. If we dive into revenue growth, we see we delivered mass market service revenue growth again this quarter, which also led to growth in the group's overall service revenues. This is an important proof point for the success of our strategy and the first step towards sustainable top-line growth for KPN. All three mass market segments contributed to the 2.2% growth in the third quarter. Wholesale also grew by 9.4%, mainly driven by broadband and mobile business and some support from seasonality and several smaller incidentals. SME service revenues inflected to 2.9% growth, driven by the success of our campaign and portfolio. In consumer, mobile service revenues continue to grow. As Joost said, fiber broadband service revenues were higher this quarter than the decline in copper, but again there was some offsetting effect by declining legacy services. Albeit small, it's important to note that the mass market segment is now no longer depending on wholesale to stabilize; we see small growth from here on. Also, in wholesale there's some growth, our growth base is widening. In terms of revenue growth going forward, we expect some technical headwinds in the year-on-year compared to Q4. We'll still grow our mass market service revenues, but the technical comparisons will be at a slightly slower pace than Q3. Notably, B2B will face a tougher revenue comp due to a spike in Q4 last year, which is mainly related to pass-through revenues in LCE and Tailored Solutions. And in B2C, more than half of the 8 million euro revenue correction we booked in the first quarter was actually related to the fourth quarter of last year, providing a more difficult comp for fixed service revenues next quarter. We expect both effects to be technical in nature and temporary, and fade again in Q1 next year, after which our top-line growth will resume from the current pace. So in summary, our revenue will continue to grow. The base comparisons will prove difficult to read from Q1, but underlying the solid growth rate in mass market service revenues.
Because of cash, we've seen strong cash generation this year despite higher capex and taxes. The higher capex related to the accelerated fiber rollout caused our operational free cash flow to decline, but this was countered by several other line items: more favorable developments in working capital as our continued effort to reduce working capital intensity is paying off; 38 million euros lower cash interest paid as a result of bond redemptions last year; and lower cash restructuring impact. Our free cash flow margin improved to 13.7% of revenues and is on a clear path to improve further in line with our guidance. Our balance sheet continues to be resilient. Committed liquidity, consisting of over 700 million euros cash and short-term investments and a 1 billion euro undrawn sustainability-linked RCF, covers debt maturities well through 2023. In the quarter, we extended our RCF but added a sustainability-linked feature to it. This underlines our commitment to sustainable operations and sustainability-oriented financing strategies. For Q2, net debt increased by 92 million euros, mainly driven by the 4.5 cents per share interim dividend in August for a total of 189 million euros, and 90 million euros worth of share repurchases in August and September as part of the 200 million share buyback program for 2021, which is, as we speak, nearly completed. And again, these were partly offset by free cash flow generated during the quarter. Our leverage ratio of 2.3 times is one notch higher compared to last quarter but still comfortably below our ceiling of 2.5 times. And reassured by our current financial performance and good strategic progress, we confidently reiterate our 2021 outlook and our ambitions for 2023.
So to summarize, as we noted in our statement this morning, the successful execution of our strategic plan enables us to return additional capital to shareholders with a 200 million euro share buyback this year, which has nearly been completed at this point in time. Execution of our strategy is on track. We remain focused on delivering long-term value to all our stakeholders. And today's results show another important proof point of the success and impact of our strategy. After returning to mass market service revenue growth in Q2, we've delivered growth in SME service revenues this quarter. The number of business segments that have inflected increases gradually. Our margins, both in EBITDA and free cash flow terms, develop favorably, and we feel confident about the cash generation of the group. And we remain fully on track to deliver our full year 2021 guidance and commitments. Thank you for listening. Now let's turn to your questions.
O
Operator16:22
Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, we will start the question and answer session now. If you would like to ask a question, you may do so by pressing star 1 on your telephone.
The first question is from Mr. Kevin Kiroya, Deutsche Bank. Go ahead, please.
K
Kevin Kiroya16:40
Thank you. I've got two questions, please. And the first one being the revenue growth trend is obviously very impressive, as Chris you highlighted. The Q3 opex reduction was a bit weaker. And can you help quantify the level of improvement we should expect for Q4? On my numbers, I was expecting 25 to 30 million of opex reduction in Q4 based on the full-year EBITDA guidance. Does that seem reasonable to you? And secondly, how should we think about opex reduction for 2022? On the one hand, you have had slower progress in 2021, but on the other, that could also help the 2022 trend as well. So both those questions and answers, please. Thank you.
C
Chris17:24
Well, Kevin, two questions. First, let me outline again on cost. I think we're seeing structural improvement in cost. As I said, the FTE levels are continuously declining. My own staff is less than 300 since beginning of this year, external staff also less than 300, and those are structural. Attrition is also good to work near 50, with FTEs leaving the company. We're hiring a bit back, but net net we're declining our staff level structurally. And again, there's some technical comparisons to Q3 last year: COVID, CLA, employment provisions, opex capex charging, some investments in commercial success. Those make for a slightly more difficult comparison to last year, so the number we present for Q3 is a bit unflattering and distorted by comparison. And finally, as I said, the restructurings that we planned for this year are more back-end loaded, kicking in in Q4. Long story short, you asked what's the guidance on outlook for Q4. You said you've got 25 to 30 million in your models. Is that a reasonable model? I would, if I had such a model, I'll keep it up and running. That seems like a reasonable assumption to me. And as far as next year is concerned, well, our program is running. We've got our target and commitments. We see FTE levels declining, restructuring kicking in. So we'll give you the full year guidance for 2022 when that moment is due, that's going to be done at the full year results. But at this point in time, we stick to our overall commitment that we keep the cost program running.
K
Kevin Kiroya19:00
Perfect, thanks Chris.
O
Operator19:05
The next question is from Mr. Joshua Mills, Exane. Go ahead, please.
J
Joshua Mills19:12
Hi guys, thanks very much. A couple of questions from me. And the first on regulations: you mentioned the ACM review, but it'd be great just to get a bit more of an overview in detail as to how you see the potential timing, the areas that could be impacted, and in what way those might be impacted. And then finally, we're going to talk about extending some wholesale deals with larger customers. My question was, have you changed terms with T-Mobile before or after the recent announcement of the business sale? And then the second question was just around inflation. And you've talked about how the FTE reductions you're making can deliver longer-term cost savings. Are there any areas within your cost space which are subject to pricing inflation, and how are the payroll contracts set up to reflect that as well? Thank you.
C
Chris20:06
Well, Joshua, let me first cover the ACM question you raised. ACM is the regulator investigating the fixed market. It's a review they do every three years, so that's not a surprise. The latest was in 2018, which was annulled by the highest court in the Netherlands last year, so we currently were not regulated. In the whole discussion around the market analysis on the fixed broadband, we believe we have a strong position and a solid case. The market, with our consumer broadband share of 38% against VodafoneZiggo with 42%, did not really change compared to last year. We follow an open wholesale policy; we did not change after we were deregulated, and that dynamic reflects the competitive dynamics in the market, you could say. So we see providers actually gaining substantial market share, which proves the model is working. Now, our regulator indicated it expects to publish a draft consultation document, as it's called, in the coming month, end of November we expect it. And after that, the process will take at least a couple of months until mid of next year. They also have to ask the market for consultation, make the final document, pass it through the EU. It will take some time. There is a belief at ACM's side that there may be a risk that KPN's access conditions will get less attractive for the market and complicate the possibility for competitors to grow. We do not recognize that, and we look forward to sharing our ideas with ACM, like we did with the providers in the market. And like I said, we were able to close longer-term contracts with those providers. Of course, there's a claim of T-Mobile in the market, but well, let's hope that the new owners of T-Mobile are more reasonable and then we can see it together and work it out like we do with the other providers. But I'm looking forward to having a good discussion with ACM and to understand the real worries. But like I said, we believe we have a strong position.
Yeah, on cost, Joshua, you think about inflation. If you think about the different cost factors, I mean the staff is one thing. I think here we've got an annual CLA increase. Our CLA runs into next year, then with three negotiations we negotiate a new one. For the moment, I think it's not just about wage increases; such effects are at play, so let's see how these negotiations work out. From now, I think continuation of our current wage policy is probably fair to assume. And with that, you know, it's not just the FTE; we're structurally declining the number of labor capacity at KPN. Let me quickly touch other components. Energy is a question that's being raised to us sometimes. The data is still limited because we actually forward bought most of our energy, so I think the energy headwind next year is probably up to 5 million euros, not more than that, simply because we've actually pre-bought forward much of our energy. If energy stays elevated at some point, the higher price will kick in, but not for next year. We see some inflation in technology prices, but that's still limited, and to some extent compensated by the fact we've also forward procured quite some of our materials. And on the rest, it means that we have to be smarter in procurement. That means consolidation of procurement, for example, the mid and long tail of our spend to consolidate suppliers. We focus more on catalog buying, more standard buying to control these effects. So in summary, there is some inflation, yes, there is. So far it feels manageable, and we can counter it by volume assignments and other measures. So it's not, I mean, if it's cost will no longer be or energy inflation will no longer be a tailwind, it's a bit of a headwind, but nothing that would keep us awake at night from where we are today.
J
Joshua Mills24:35
Right, that's very clear. Thank you.
O
Operator24:40
The next question is from Mr. Ulrich Rata. Yes, go ahead, please.
U
Ulrich Rata24:46
Thank you. I have two questions, please. My first one is on the inflection of mass market service revenue. This is reporting a further expansion of the growth rate, which is good to see. Would you go as far as committing to that remaining in growth on a quarterly basis over the foreseeable future? There is a bit of sort of pandemic help in there, I suppose, at the moment. And so the question is, is this something that you can commit to on a quarterly basis, that it will remain in growth? Second question is the broadband RGU picture. This is still sort of slight leakage of broadband customers net net, I suppose, as you lock customers into your own fiber network but then the copper customers who are in competitive fiber areas, they get sucked up by the competitors. So I'm wondering, is there a point at which you think the broadband customer base shrinkage can be stopped? I understand a bit about the higher revenue growth that comes with the dynamics, but simply on the volume side, that it can be stopped. Thank you.
J
Joost Farwerck26:04
Yeah, always to start with your second question. Of course, our strategy is not only focused on fiber but also on broadband in general. The more fiber we roll out, the better it gets because we strengthen our weakest areas first. Because on one hand, we have low quality on copper; on the other hand, we have high quality on copper in certain areas, especially in the largest cities we can do 200 to 500 megabits per household via double copper line. So what we now saw is that for the first time, we were able to more than compensate the loss on copper by fiber. And by pushing this further and by focusing even more on our copper steering as well, we think in the quarters to come we will have to grow in broadband, both in business and in the customers, by the strategy. So there is a lag there. There's a churn on copper on one hand and there's growth from fiber on the other end, and it's our focus area to run that balance and optimize that balance better along the road. So that's what our whole strategy is about. So last quarter, or a couple of quarters ago, we were still in decline; the copper loss was much higher than the fiber gain. Now it's more or less break-even, and on the revenue side we do better. So yeah, step by step we improve this run rate. I would say on mass market growth rate, I would say before I hand over to Chris that it's also a step-by-step run rate improvement here. And we identified mass market as the most important focus point for this year because that's where 90% of our EBITDA comes from: consumer, wholesale, and SME. And we, looking at the run rate, we saw the growth coming in SME, but I'm of course happy that it's really visible now. And I would say that yeah, it's our job to run the run rate in a better way in the quarters to come as well.
C
Chris28:18
Chris, yeah, to your point on the pandemic impact, the pandemic impact on revenues has actually been limited on.
J
Joost Farwerck28:24
The mass market, I mean, we lost some, we gained something on interconnect revenues, you know, on interconnect mobile calls people calling like 0800 cover numbers, and at the same time due to the pandemic we lost roaming revenues, without arguing, and that's of course a much higher margin business. So I would argue that revenue-wise has been flat to slightly negative, EBITDA margin probably slightly highly negative, perhaps a bit of cost benefits to cover it, but the revenue has not been that much affected by the pandemic. If you look at the coming quarters, if I look at where we are today, and the upcoming comparisons, I think we are well set to grow well into next year, so we'll show year-on-year growth numbers well into next year simply looking at the current run rate of service revenues, the underlying growth rate, and then the upcoming comparables. As we said, Q4 will be a bit funny because, for example, there is a revenue correction that we booked. It was an unfortunate event in Q4 last year and a correction Q1 this year. For example, I think Q4 expect mass market service revenue growth to be about 0.3 to 0.4 simply because of that comparison, and going back to 2% or even a bit higher in Q1 simply because of those technicalities. But the underlying growth probably around 1.5% to 2% in the coming two quarters, and I can see it growing well into next year.
C
Chris29:53
Very helpful, thank you very much.
O
Operator29:59
The next question is from Mr. Conrad Zomer, ABN AMRO. Go ahead.
C
Conrad Zomer30:07
Hi, please, afternoon. Um, first question is on the migration to KPN-1. I think you did a great job on migrating SME. I can imagine that to migrate large customers it's going to take more time or simply more complex. What gives you the confidence that that's running about one year behind the migration of SME? And in particular, what should we expect in terms of revenue loss initially? Because we did see that with SME you turned it around very quickly, but I can imagine it can be a little bit bigger in LCE. And my other question is on your statement about shareholder remuneration. You've nearly completed the 200 million. I know from talking to several investors that they were looking for another announcement this quarter. It looks like maybe at the start of 2022 you might announce another buyback. You've used the word structural a few times. It tends to maybe be a bit more specific, combined with your leverage ratio, your cash flow profile, but in particular what that could impact for the share buybacks going forward. Thank you.
J
Joost Farwerck31:27
Yes, I will do the first question. Um, yeah, so we migrated all our customers to KPN One in the SME segment. That was not done quickly but took too long, as far as I'm concerned, by the way, but we're there now. And by doing that, migrating them to the future-proof portfolio, enabling ourselves to sell up again to that customer base, now makes it possible and doable to grow in the SME segment. So the dynamics in LC are completely different, although the idea is the same. In LC we will migrate the larger customers to a new environment, and once they're there we're in a much better shape to upsell and make our business grow. It's not that we had to start on that; we already migrated 80% of our LCE base to that new environment. And the difference between how we will follow the last 20% compared to SME is that we found out that the last 20% is the most difficult part, and the first 20% is the most easy part to migrate when it comes to customers. So on LC we are following a more delicate migration scheme to avoid that we really move customers against their wishes to a new kind of platform. So the dynamics are different. We're the largest workspace provider in the Netherlands, so there's a lot of workspace for large customers in that base. And it's not only migrating customers but also really moving them up to a better, more protected, higher quality, safer, faster service. So maybe it will take some more time, but we're super focused on not losing too much business there when we have to migrate the last 20%. But already 80% has been done on LC. Um, yeah, Conrad, on the share buyback, as you pointed out correctly, the 2020-21 program is nearly finished. I guess it will happen probably in the coming weeks. That standard 2021 program, as in this year we effectively return all of the free cash flow we generate this year, we return to our shareholders. We said this is a structural part of our shareholder remuneration policy. That means we're going to continue this. It doesn't mean we're going to announce another one every quarter, but we have to announce the 2021 version. The 2022 one will announce an event. It is a continuous and constant part of our reward program in which we take free cash flow into account, our balance sheet into account, with the objective to make it a structural, repetitive part of our shareholder reward. And we'll design it like that. The exact number, I have to keep the spirits up, tension high. We'll let you know when we get there. Probably be communicated at the year results, and we keep the outlook for next year.
C
Chris34:38
Okay, thank you very much.
O
Operator34:42
The next question is from Mr. Polo Tong. Yes, go ahead, please.
P
Polo Tong34:48
Um, yeah, hi. Thanks for taking the question. I just have one. It's really just about EBITDA. So your EBITDA growth year to date is plus 0.3%, and to achieve your guidance for the full year you need close to 4% EBITDA growth in Q4. So can you really just talk about what makes you so confident that you can achieve this step up in growth? Can you maybe talk through some of the key moving parts, and what does this mean for the trajectory of EBITDA growth into 2022? Thanks.
C
Chris35:17
Yeah, Apollo, it's Chris here. I think it's for Q4 it's easy to talk about the earnings that you need rather than the growth, and we've given a guidance for the year. If you go back, you can almost backwards solve the amount of EBITDA you need to get there, which will then be growth over last year. And again, last year if you remember, Q4 we had was relatively low EBITDA, so the growth will look good. To me, it's about the absolute level of EBITDA. Look what we need or we guide for for Q4 and compare it to Q3. For example, the Q3 EBITDA level was affected in September. Q3 is always high, there's the classical release of the holiday provision and some other elements. If you strip those out, we need to continue to run at the current underlying earnings rate, do a bit better, and then we'll hit the number that we are required to meet our full-year guidance. And the growth is a function of that. So to me it's more about confidence in the euros we'll make in the quarter, and that actually is a continuation of the current structural earnings rate of the group with some slight improvements that we think is actually feasible. And then the growth number comes out of that. But it's the euro number that should drive the guidance, and we've got all comfort in that.
O
Operator36:44
The next question is from Mr. Andrew Lee, Goldman Sachs. Go ahead, please.
A
Andrew Lee36:49
Yeah, good afternoon everyone. I had two questions. The first was another question just around the pandemic impact on your top line growth. So obviously you've had a successful period upselling which is driving your strong growth in the quarter. Just how confident are you that this isn't just a temporary phenomenon caused by a pull forward of demand for higher speeds, given the work from home set up across Europe and in the Netherlands for you guys? We're just seeing like an acceleration of people's willingness to pay more for more right now. That doesn't necessarily continue. So that's question number one. Second question was just on B2B. Given your success in inflecting the revenue growth of SME, where does that put you or does that pull forward your inflection on B2B altogether, and timeline on that? Thank you.
J
Joost Farwerck37:52
Well, when it comes to COVID effect on our top line, we are not benefiting that much from COVID. We think there's a lot more to upgrade to do in the Netherlands than we currently see. This is the Netherlands. So when we started on fiber, people started to buy 50 megabits. Currently 100 is more the average. So we don't think that during the pandemic people asked for an upgrade and later in time they will ask for a downgrade again. Once you're up on the hundred or 200 and you found out the difference, people will not move back. By the way, we also priced our speed on fiber more attractively last quarter because we really tried to motivate our customers to do an upgrade. But we didn't see a real relation between the pandemic kicking in and upgrades being asked. It's a more delicate line we see there. So we think, now we roll out fiber and we move to HGSpon which is enabling us to upgrade to 10 gigabits per household, we think there's far more potential in upgrading our customers in the years to come. And on B2B, well, we announced that we are going to stabilize our SME business second half of this year. So we're a bit ahead of the track with slight growth in that segment, so that's good. And of course now the jury is out: first of all, keep the growth in SME, and secondly how to inflect the other parts of that B2B business, and when. We aim for that and we're ready for an update on that when we release our annual figures next year. And for us that of course is a super important milestone because then we have full top line growing again. But we're confident we're going to do it, but we don't want to overpromise now. It's the first quarter we see the SME market growing, so first keep that under control, and then soon we will come back to you on how to inflect the other part of B2B.
A
Andrew Lee40:11
Thank you, it's very helpful.
O
Operator40:16
The next question is from Mr. Luigi Minerva, HSBC. Go ahead, please.
L
Luigi Minerva40:23
Yes, uh, good afternoon. Thanks for taking my two questions. So the first one is on capex. I was wondering how do you see the capex profile evolving in the medium term? I think you signaled capex normalization starting from 2022, but then when the 5G network densification kicks off, what sort of impact will it have? So do you think that the capital intensity eventually will kind of start growing again if you think about the next five years? And perhaps related to that, but moving to the shareholder remuneration, so how do you make the share buyback a structural component? Obviously you create a very strong signaling system, and I was wondering whether capex at some point becomes subordinate to the shareholder remuneration, so in other words whether the capex number becomes even more discretionary for the sake of keeping a gradually increasing shareholder remuneration. Thank you.
J
Joost Farwerck41:45
Yes, Luigi. Last year when we announced our strategic plan we were fully aware of the fact that we were increasing our capex to a level of between 1.1 and 1.2 related to the rollout of more fiber in the Netherlands. And with that capex envelope we think we stretch the level of investments in the Netherlands, and it's a huge amount of capex for a country like the Netherlands. What we expect is that after 2026, when we're done – because then we rolled out 80% and we expect other initiatives to cover the other 20% in the Netherlands, so the whole Netherlands is connected to fiber – then it makes sense to put in the program that we will step down significantly on capex. Now in our industry there's always a promise of a short-term step-up in capex and a longer-term step-down, and we are aware of that as well. So it is for us super important that we stick to the program and we keep our promise. 5G is something we are really very prudent on. There's an auction coming up next year. We already rolled out the network; the network is 5G ready on 5000 sites which covers the Netherlands. But we're not trigger happy to start rolling out a more dense network, thousands of sites in the Netherlands, because we are really working there business case based. So we have some field trials out there, and we're scanning all over the world what's happening on 5G. It's super fantastic what one can do on 5G on certain locations, but it really should pay back before we do the investments we've seen in other countries. Many investments in such doubtful business cases – we really are prudent there. And so I don't think we will start to work on a network that's covering 5G 3.5 gigahertz spectrum speeds through the Netherlands. It really is going to be business case by business case.
C
Chris44:09
Yeah, on the capital we need to add to that. I mean, if you think about the capex ratios, meaning our fiber we're spending between 8% and 10% of our revenues on fiber – it depends a bit on what quarter you look at. Non-fiber is between 12% to 14%, fluctuates a bit quarter to quarter, but you get like 22% to 23% of revenues on capex. That is, we are fully aware that's a significant spend. And as you said, as soon as the fiber program is done, the addition of the fiber program will obviously fade away, and you get to an underlying fiber capex profile which is probably more in line with the European telcos, much more in line with our non-fiber spend. And that's the way we look at it. If you think, is it subordinate to shareholder returns? The way we think about it is, you look at your capex that you can structure into different buckets. There's the bucket that has to do with maintenance, life cycle management, dealing with increased traffic, security – that is your license to operate. That we'll always have to invest to make sure we keep our business running. Then there's capex that creates the customer experience; to me that's in general good capex, provided of course you sell profitable products. But assuming that your business is profitable, consumer capex tends to be good capex. And then there is capex which is more growth oriented, like which I would qualify fiber at some point – growth oriented capex. And critically, that needs to make an attractive return. And what we then do of course is look at the ROI, the IRR of the capex you invest there. And of course you always keep in mind how does the IRR of that capex stack up to, for example, buying back your own shares. Not that you could immediately swing capex 100 millions every year and buy back shares back and forth, but it's a good disciplining factor to make sure that the return that you make on the capex stacks up to the alternative of buying back your own shares. That to me is a very good disciplining factor in determining how much you can spend in growth and innovation, new products, new initiatives. When it comes to our shareholder remuneration policy, I ultimately think you and we want our shareholder returns to be founded in continuously growing free cash flows. We designed a program that our cash flows can grow in the coming years – you'll see it according to guidance – and you can top that up with whatever room you've got on your balance sheet. In the long term, it's important that your cash flow will grow. Capex is an important element to it, and as you saluted, at some point the fiber part will become less, and then your capex will come down and free cash will step up, and that will have positive repercussions for shareholder returns.
L
Luigi Minerva46:54
That's great, thank you.
O
Operator47:00
The next question is from Mr. Uzman Ghazi, Bernstein. Go ahead, please.
U
Uzman Ghazi47:07
Hello, thank you. I've got a few questions, please. The first one was just from these extension of wholesale agreements that you've announced this quarter. Or I mean, could you perhaps just illustrate if whether these were tough negotiations, and you know what were kind of some of the reports and takes that you had to concede to, or to get these agreements done, and over what period? Are these agreements similar to the previous agreements you used to do, because of the years or are these short term? Would be helpful.
O
Operator48:18
When it comes to the quality of the line, can't be KPS. There'll be something on your side.
U
Uzman Ghazi48:23
Okay, okay, sorry. Is it better now? Yeah.
O
Operator48:29
Just better. Sorry, okay, sorry. Would you please repeat your second question?
U
Uzman Ghazi48:31
Yeah, the second question was just on the copper shutdown that you did in six areas in the Netherlands this quarter. I believe it was for 40,000 connections. I mean, during that process, it would be great to know what your experience was, whether there was a situation where there had to be any forced migrations of remaining customers, or whether it was just the demand for fiber led to a natural kind of migration in that process. Thanks.
J
Joost Farwerck49:06
Yeah, thanks for your question. Good to hear you speak a bit Dutch as well nowadays. Um, when it comes to wholesale agreements, I mean, we have these long-term relationships with several service providers out there in the Dutch market, not only T-Mobile but a lot more. And the reason why we have a good relationship is that we try to optimize the business model on both sides. So we make it doable for the smaller service providers to plug in on one or two locations in the Netherlands, and via that we can serve them on broadband through the whole country, which makes it far more efficient on their side, and for us a bit better as well because it's on the active layer of the network and therefore generating a bit more margin. So it's a win-win kind of situation. And I think that's why – it's not only a storyline we tell to convince our regulator that everything is working in the Dutch market, but that open network model, that open access network model, is really working quite well for both our customers and ourselves. Um, yeah, the copper switch-off and the migration to fiber in those areas is of course very important for us. We've been talking further on that topic for four years now. Also there we use ACM's guidelines to announce switch-off from certain areas three years in advance, if I'm not mistaken. But also these areas are not new; they are older areas, so already five to eight years old in some cases. So it's known that we have to at the end switch off the legacy network. It used to be tougher, but we changed our fiber model a bit. So when we roll out fiber, we're more focusing on migrating our customer base to fiber in the early stage, sell up and migrate, complementary fiber upgrades earlier in the process than we did in the past to make that migration possible. And also the other providers, the wholesale providers, most of them are following that because it's also of course important to sell fiber in those areas. So we did a switch-off of I think you're right, 40,000 lines, something like that. That was more of a pilot in a couple of areas. We're very satisfied that we really switched off the whole MDF and the number exchange in those areas. And in 2023 the real program kicks off; then we are really going to disconnect several areas with a large base of copper. And that is important because of the cost related to the copper network. The service tickets on copper are much higher than on fiber; it's more expensive to maintain a copper network in general in the Netherlands than fiber. So when it comes to efficiency, it's important to do the copper switch-off. And we really will start a real program in 2023. And your point on forced migrations: not really. I mean, we learned from these copper pilot discoveries – very important to start early, communicate early and frequently to customers. If you communicate early on that it is going to happen, are very clear and repeat that, customers eventually will move from copper to fiber. And as you know, we've got an offer where for the same speed from copper to fiber, you don't pay extra for the same speed. So for a client, actually, if he or she wants to stay at that current speed level, it's no additional cost. Just to make sure, there are always customers who do not respond; then you have to chase and make sure you connect with them. It's not the unwillingness of the customer; it's sometimes that customers don't pick up the phone, don't read their emails on time. So it's more about pointing them to it and then having the last bunch of customers that you actually have to personally connect, go door to door, rather than forced migration. It's about making sure you connect with customers on time, and it's all about preparation. And we see if you prepare well and early on, those transitions actually go pretty smooth. And where you are late or later, you've got much more work to do to migrate those customers.
U
Uzman Ghazi53:30
Right, thank you. Just one follow-up. This is on the length of the wholesale agreements that you've recently signed. I mean, are these kind of seven-year length deals, similar to what you used to have, or are these shorter in length?
J
Joost Farwerck53:48
No, they're multi-year contracts. They vary by customer, but they tend to be multi-year contracts.
U
Uzman Ghazi53:55
Right, thank you.
O
Operator53:59
The next question is from Mr. Jacob Bluestone, Credit Suisse. Go ahead, please.
J
Jacob Bluestone54:06
Hi, thanks for taking the questions. Fairly quick. Firstly, just on the business segment. You mentioned the challenge of migrating the last 20 percent, the hardest ones. Just to be clear, do you think you can actually see some of the non-SME revenue segments worsen as you try to migrate those? I mean, if I look, for example, your tailored solution revenues went from sort of minus four to minus five, and the LC sort of looks like it's fairly unchanged at minus six percent year on year. So just interested whether you think it could actually get worse before it gets better, just so we sort of understand the glide path. And then just secondly, I see there's some press coverage that Vodafone Netherlands has had three service disruptions in October. It's a little bit difficult for us to gauge from outside the Netherlands how significant that is. We're just interested in hearing, is that significant from your point of view? Is that something you should materially benefit from? Thank you.
J
Joost Farwerck55:08
Yeah, so on B2B, what I mentioned when I said the last 20% is difficult – there are always customers that just don't want us to touch anything. And sometimes they're right, by the way. So that's always the toughest part of the whole migration program. It doesn't mean that we're going to push our business additionally down, so I don't see the trend worsening related to the migration in B2B. We're not super happy with the current developments; it's our aim to inflect to positive growth. So the whole migration is about improving the run rate at the end and keep it where it is in the short term. So I don't see the trend worsening. On Vodafone and the outages in the Dutch market, there is an old habit of not making jokes about computational failures because before you know it, it bites you in the neck. But the only thing I can say is this is super important to invest in quality of your network, and that's what we are doing. So we're focused on our own, and we decided to upgrade our core mobile network, to migrate it to Ericsson. We're investing in our core and access networks intensively. And we're focused on that. But we never think that we can benefit from bad news on competition. That is a negative business model and not good for the business in general, I would say.
J
Jacob Bluestone56:42
Very clear, thank you.
C
Chris56:45
Okay, thank you very much. Thank you, host Chris. That concludes the Q3 call. If there's any further questions, please contact the event relations team. Operator, over to you.
O
Operator56:56
Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's presentation. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect your line.