Arnaud De puyfontaine6:51
It's not a divestment, it's just an evolution of our commitment. Sorry, it's a semantic aspect but it's the reality. You keep 10%, we keep 10%. And it turns out that the shareholder who is the main shareholder of the group, the Bolloré group, is also a shareholder of Universal Music Group. So let's put this evolution, this news of last September 21, in its historical context. In 2014, and pardon me for referring a bit to historical elements, but at the time people said that music had no future, that it was gloom and doom, and that we should sell Universal. Vivendi had been approached by a group that had proposed a valuation of 7 billion, a valuation considered important at the time. But we made a choice, and I say 'we' because it's very important: it's the management team of Vivendi, but also the support of its reference shareholder, to say we think there is a future for music. We think that after the downloading—because you have to look at what it was like at the time, we saw the beginnings of the decline of downloading with iTunes and the beginnings of platforms like Spotify with Daniel Ek. And two choices were made with the team at Universal, which was number one in 2014: we will invest to create the economic conditions that allow an ecosystem to restart growth, and that is the ecosystem of digital distribution platforms, the famous streaming. Today, Universal Music Group works with 400 players, but at the time, six years ago, a long time ago, there was great doubt about the viability of this new system of music consumption. So there was a strategic, industrial, economic bet to accompany this evolution of music. And the second thing is that Universal Music was already a leader, it was about increasing investments in what is called in music the artists and repertoire. What does artist and repertoire represent? They are almost R&D investments in the music industry: finding talent. If you look at what allowed a Billie Eilish to become one of the world stars in music, it's the investments and the ability to find these stars. Last year, of the top ten singers in the music industry, all ten were from Universal Music Group, and if you take the top ten, more than 70% were artists who were not known in 2014. So that's the whole logic of development, an industrial bet that was made.
So, the number of times that commentators, you know, said it will never work, there is no future, etc. We gradually built an industrial success. Now this industrial success was so striking that we found ourselves with a sort of hypertrophy of Universal Music Group within the strategic project of Vivendi. And I remind you, it is a company that has a reference shareholder, the Bolloré group, but it is a listed company, a CAC 40 player, we have many American, British shareholders, etc. And you had a sort of exclusive focus on music, but next to it, all the other businesses of the group—Canal+ is a formidable house, an exceptional group, Havas is a remarkable player in the communication sector, and I won't list all the activities—you had a valuation of Universal Music Group that was almost equal to the market capitalization of Vivendi. Sorry to use financial aspects, but it's a reality. And so what we decided to do when we announced at the end of April 2018, if my memory is correct, that we would start working on possible evolutions of Universal Music's capital, is simply to create a history: let's make it so that we can give Universal the possibility to accelerate its growth, but also to partially separate the tree from the forest that this tree hides. And that's exactly what we developed with a whole process that was a bit long, but successfully crowned, and which means that we have a participation that is of course lower than what it was in Universal Music Group. We remain very associated, very close to the house from a strategic and operational point of view. Capitalistically, we gave the house the possibility to have this shareholder Tencent for the opening to China and all the perspectives that this formidable country and this part of the world offer, an American shareholder Bill Ackman who gives the American exposure, and a company listed in Amsterdam that effectively allows it to accelerate its growth. I think there is a very bright future for music. So not a divestment, a new phase of Vivendi's life, and the ability, while remaining very close to the Universal Music Group house, to give ourselves as a group with global ambition in the media sector the possibility to concentrate and give visibility to all our activities and our project, which was a bit hidden because of the formidable success of Universal. And so my mission, our mission and our determination in what is today Vivendi Act 2, if I may express myself that way, or the third chapter of Vivendi, and the act of this third chapter is to have the ability to demonstrate in all our other businesses our capacity for transformation, because that is what we have piloted, that is what we have done with the evolution of Universal Music Group in recent years, and to do it across all the businesses that make up the group today, while creating value, because value allows us to have resources, resources allow us to invest, and to be able, in this extraordinary global consolidation in the communication sector, to have the chance to be competitive and to achieve the ambitious strategic objectives for Vivendi that I described at the beginning of our exchange.