Back
Mark Koziel
President and CEO, AICPA (and CEO, Association of International Certified Professional Accountants), American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA)

Ep 51: The Future of the CPA Profession in the Age of AI with Mark Koziel

🎥 Jun 04, 2024 📺 Whitman Advisory ⏱ 30m
Source: https://www.podbean.com/eau/pb-9yh6w-... How will AI, talent shortages, and changing expectations reshape the accounting profession over the next five years?   Recorded at the 10th anniversary of AICPA ENGAGE, Phil Whitman sits down with AICPA CEO Mark Koziel to discuss the profession’s rapid transformation. They explore why firms must rethink how they develop young professionals, how AI is creating new opportunities for advisory and assurance, and why CPAs must remain at the center of trust, governance, and business decision-making.   In this episode, you will be able to: • Understan...
Watch on YouTube

About Mark Koziel

Mark Koziel, CEO of the AICPA and the Association of International Certified Professional Accountants, appeared on the podcast "Everything CPA and Private Equity" in June 2024, recorded at the AICPA ENGAGE conference. He discussed the profession's talent shortage, describing it as an "unstoppable" cliff, noting that the number of students graduating each year is lower than the number of CPAs retiring. He argued that firms need to find new ways to operate in response to this trend. Koziel also addressed the role of AI in accounting, stating that CPAs have the opportunity to manage controls over AI for their companies and to serve as finance partners helping business leaders ensure AI outputs are appropriate for decision-making. He mentioned that the AICPA is building a "simulator" for training new professionals, which he said would be scalable to firms of all sizes.

Source: AI-verified profile updated from Mark Koziel's recent appearances. Browse all interviews →

Transcript (37 segments)
P
Phil Whitman0:02
Welcome to Everything CPA and Private Equity, where we unpack the evolving relationship between accounting firms, private equity, and other strategics. I'm David Wolfkell, and I'm Phil Whitman, and we've chatted with more than 150 private equity groups. We've actually closed over 40 transactions with those private equity groups, and we're bringing you firsthand insights from the front lines. And whether you're exploring your first deal, putting your toe in the water, refining your strategy, we're here to guide you with real stories, expert advice, actionable takeaways. Let's dive in.
Hello everyone and welcome to another episode of Everything CPA and Private Equity. And I am so proud to be at the AICPA Engage conference 10th anniversary, and I'm here with Mark Koziel, the CEO. I really feel blessed, have to pinch myself. This is a special moment for not only us at Whitman Advisory, but for all of you, our listeners and viewers out there. So, Mark, you know, we're just going to have a conversation. I guess the first thing I'd like to do is say congratulations. It's been an absolutely wonderful event. We decided to show up in a very big way this year. We've got about 17 of our folks and we have a beautiful pavilion, and it's really the way to go, and all you folks have just been really, really kind and special, and I want to thank you for that.
M
Mark Koziel1:36
Well, no, thank you, and it's thanking the team. The team did an incredible job this year, from the selection of the keynotes to just making sure that everyone's experience was just top-notch. It's been a lot of excitement and just really well-run, and the team did an incredible job.
P
Phil Whitman1:52
Yes. Yes. You know, it's interesting. When I first started what's now Whitman Advisory, it was just me. Three years in, I added a stay-at-home mom, but I had come from an environment where I had an organization with about 100 administrative folks, as the COO of a top 100 firm. And I kind of missed that. And we've now got to the point where we're large enough – we like to say we're the single largest advisory firm helping CPA firms in the nation, with 52 people – and I certainly can understand the ability to execute when you have scale, and you do have an amazing team. I remember the days when it was just me, and I was trying to get a Gail Crosley or a Steve Ericson to come into New York City, and I'd be doing these CPE sessions and hammering away on the phones trying to get 24 people into a room. It's a lot of work. But the attendance I've seen here today and the number of people is simply amazing.
M
Mark Koziel2:56
Well, just shy of 6,000 this year. Wow. So, you know, my ultimate goal, I said I can retire when we hit 10. You know, that's where I want to be. I've had this vision for a long time. As you know, I was at AICPA and then left for five years and came back as CEO. But I was here for the start of it 10 years ago, and part of the planning, it used to be my team ran tech back in the day, and that became the foundation for what became the NATs and a few others. So I said we don't have just one ultimate meeting or conference for the entire profession here in the US, and we should, and that's really what we were going at.
P
Phil Whitman3:38
This is the biggest, this has been the best. This has been really awesome.
M
Mark Koziel3:42
That's great.
P
Phil Whitman3:43
And I look around, I see people with smiles, and it was very, very thankful for this. So I kind of want to shift, and we'll keep this casual. There's a lot going on in our industry. And you know, no matter who you speak with, if they're an influencer or a voice that's heard in our profession, you keep hearing there's never been as much change in our profession as what we're seeing now. Share, from your perspective, because as you said, you were at the AICPA, and then I believe when you detoured out, you spent some time at a lineal, a great international association of firms, some great clients of ours there. How do you compare seeing what you see today here as CEO of the AICPA compared to when you were interacting with a much smaller group of firms? What does all this mean to you and the direction you hope to take the AICPA with all these changes?
M
Mark Koziel4:43
Well, for us, it's helping lead our profession forward. I said one of the big things, because everybody wants to talk about AI, this is the change, right? But it's always been technology. When I started, it was right in the early days of – I won't even say it's Excel – we were on Lotus 123, right? And VisiCalc while I was in college. So I…
P
Phil Whitman5:07
Remember those days.
M
Mark Koziel5:11
Right. And so, talking to others who were in practice 40, 45 years ago, they would talk about the footing room, right? The firms had footers. They just sat there all day – those were your new associates. They were the footers, generally speaking. So, you know, how is that providing talent on how to audit, how to have critical thinking, how to interact with a client – all those skills today are so much different, and we've transformed into that already.
P
Phil Whitman5:29
You know, how is that providing talent on how to audit, how to have critical thinking, how to interact with a client – all those skills today are so much different, and we've transformed into that already. Yes, we haven't quite kept up. And this is the same on business and industry. I've had a lot of conversations with CFOs bringing new associates in. They used to do the debits and the credits. Now they're being asked to do the critical thinking and analytics immediately, but they haven't done the base. This is where I see it as our job. We keep talking a lot about a simulator model, get the training up. So that's all well before AI even comes into play. Now AI comes into play and it changes it even more, but we're still in the same game. This is where, talking about advisory, talking about the different things we need to do, I see it as even greater opportunity. And we are hitting this kind of cliff on talent that is going to be unstoppable. The fact that the number of students each year coming out of school in total are less than they're ever going to be, and far less than we're going to have in retirements and CPAs. So we need to figure out how to do things differently anyway.
M
Mark Koziel6:39
Yes. So, for me, it's opportunistic that this is here now, but we got to train up the young associates. We still need to hire and make sure that we're…
P
Phil Whitman6:47
What you said absolutely resonates with me as someone that used to be in a firm trying to recruit that talent, and now having an organization where we go out and provide talent solutions. Do you think that with AI, you know, we always say the PCPS section every year, didn't matter small, medium, large, giant-size firm, talent was always on that list of one of the pain points, most years at the top of that list. I would always say, as a former COO that was on that side of the desk trying to bring that talent in, and now as a provider trying to bring that talent to all of our clients, the perception that – and I've been in 42 years, by the way. I remember my first portable computer, it was like 45 pounds. It was a Compaq and the keyboard folded down, and it was a five-inch monochromatic amber screen. And we were proud to lug that. I got a portable computer with a 5.25-inch floppy discs that you would stick inside. But in any event, as it relates to talent, you know, the Big Four historically hire about 75% of all graduates. Now, when you and I went to school, the Big Four went to select schools. They didn't hire everyone from every school. I think back then, if a Big Four hired you, you wanted to have that on your resume. They were very selective. It was a really big deal to me. Today, the Big Four hire 75% of accountants from all over, from every university, as long as they're good quality folks. I understand young folks still wanting to get that on their resume. Now we're hearing the Big Four are hiring less. They've got tech. Do you think talent is a problem that will ever go away?
M
Mark Koziel8:39
No, not as far as the profession's concerned. You know, it's interesting. I don't know if we had a talent problem when I graduated. I graduated '91 from Buffalo, practiced in Buffalo, and I remember my senior year, the fall of my senior year when recruiting season is, going to the career center and seeing the list of interviews being half of what they were the year before. We had the S&L crisis then. Yes, there were three banks that went down in Buffalo. There were accountants on the street everywhere. Not only in the banks, they were gone. But the firms that audited them, those auditors were gone, too. Massive layoffs. In my junior year, we all heard about it. The firms hired half as many. Then you fast forward to the mid-‘90s, all of a sudden everyone's talking about a talent crunch. Yes. Right. Where are all the seniors at? Right. And I had six first interviews. Got called back at five of the six. The one that didn't call me back, I ended up spending most of my public accounting career with. I went to work for them three years later.
P
Phil Whitman9:38
Which firm was that?
M
Mark Koziel9:39
That was Dopkins & Company.
P
Phil Whitman9:40
Okay.
M
Mark Koziel9:41
I started with Lumsden McCormick and I moved to Dopkins. But Dopkins didn't hire any staff in '91. In '94 they're like 'We need seniors.' Yes. And this is where I keep saying, for all the firms, we have to keep producing them. We're trying to make everybody immediately billable, and that's not going to be the case. If we get off this hours times rate thing and everybody immediately has to be profitable in those first couple of years, it's really going to be about simulation and learning in the environment of the firm and on actual client data, because they're not going to have that opportunity out at the client to do that. The pyramid we've known, that new associate what we've always asked them to do – people are like, 'Well, we're lopping off the bottom.' Well, we're not. We're raising up the bottom. We're elevating it.
P
Phil Whitman10:29
That's right. Because the manager, senior manager is where we start now. But we're going to need to invest that talent, because there's going to be – and we can never ask the universities to teach that, because they're going to need to do it on actual client.
It has to be on-the-job training. It has to be – you're the partner, I'm that young person, I've got to be attached to your hip and be a sponge in order to learn. Because I graduated in '83. I started at Price Waterhouse, a year and that was it. I ended up going to a large international firm, Spicer & Oppenheim, who ultimately blew up. They had a big insurance claim. I left before then. But in '86, I started a restaurant business. I left public accounting. I did audit, I did tax. I had this opportunity. We did a private placement memorandum, raised about $687,000. I got into the restaurant business. But in 1991, we were out. Had massive layoffs, Bluepoint Labs closed up, and we all left. Fast food would be recession-proof. I was a Popeyes Famous Fried Chicken & Biscuit franchisee. Had a five-store contract really early. There were no Popeyes anywhere here in the Northeast, not like there are today. But in any event, I exited that business in 1991 and decided to go back into public accounting – fried chicken for the rest of my life. So it was so hard getting a job. I was fortunate. I landed a per diem job at Citrin Cooperman from February 15th to April 15th. Yep. I worked with Joel and Niles, and they were getting ready to move. They were outgrowing their space. I literally worked in a closet because they were busting at the seams. I was a senior tax accountant. Probably back then making about $30,000 a year. And they said April 15th came and they said, 'You did a wonderful job. After we move to new space, we'll reach out to you. Stay in touch. Maybe we'll have a job for you.' And literally a week later, they called me up and said, 'Phil, we have a client. It's a law firm. They've been leaned and levied by the IRS and New York State. Can you go in, straighten them out, six to eight weeks, and by then we will have moved and we'll have a place for you.' That's good. And that's how my practice management career was born. But 1991, firms were not hiring. That's right. I mean, for me, it was a per diem job. And you know, that was in the day that you couldn't go online.
M
Mark Koziel13:05
There was no online. It was like looking through the New York Times, which would have five, six, seven pages of accountant jobs, and in 1991 maybe there was like one column.
P
Phil Whitman13:17
That's right. And it also shows the resiliency of the profession. In '91 we suffered through that, and by '94 we're short. Yes. And then I don't know that we've ever recovered since, to be honest. I remember the shortage ever since. But careful, yes and no. Part of the issue is, in this year especially, we actually have a surplus of candidates because of the change – 40 states have already passed adding a bachelor's plus two. So you have bachelor students and 150-hour students all coming out at the same time in 2026, more than we've seen. And this is why, going back to the simulator model and talking about why it's important to the firms – American Airlines hires pilots, but once they hire the pilots, they bring them to their simulators to learn on American Airlines equipment. They don't do it in the air. They do it down in Miami. I actually have a neighbor who is a trainer for American Airlines at the Miami simulator.
M
Mark Koziel14:19
My son is a pilot. He went to Embry-Riddle. And you're absolutely right. He went to train on a Pilatus PC-12. He didn't go up in a plane. He spent 10, 12 hours in a simulator. That was it. It was like real. But on the ground and safe. You're not going to crash a $10 million plane.
P
Phil Whitman14:41
We don't want new associates crashing our clients either. So let's get them in a simulator. They can learn there. You can even have an AI. And that's the thing – we're building the simulator. It will be scalable to all size firms. I'm excited about that. That is part of our job to really help move the profession forward with that. I think so. So talent is absolutely something we're keeping a pulse on. I do believe that part of the challenges up until this point, and I think it's going to dissipate a little bit, is Big Four would hire 75%, and many of them work the way we used to work, like baby boomers – 60, 70, 80, 90 hours a week, week in and week out. And some of the people that leave, okay, they're still very good, but they get burned out. I think as a profession we haven't done a wonderful job educating those folks that go to the Big Four that the middle market world, once you go down, it's very different. We started rolling out the red carpet in the early 2000s because we had that problem. And so sometimes the middle market firms never get a chance at hiring some of these wonderful people because their perception is this is what public accounting is about, this is what it's going to be like no matter where I go.
M
Mark Koziel16:03
Yeah. I think the Big Four have been better than in the prior years. And it is a demanding profession in general. But I've said time and again, it's out there in many different ways. I think it's been more the type of person that we attract to the profession that has that ingrained in them, and those are the ones that tend to succeed. I had nine W-2s in my senior year of college, trying to pay for getting through school. I could tell you digging fence posts in 95-degree heat – that's hard work. So it's – but I chose this profession. I felt lucky to be chosen, that the profession chose me, and so I gave back to my employers in the same way. I think you're right, and I do think that there's opportunity now for all size firms to hire talent on campus. Also, I think in an internship model, getting some interns in and real-world experience so they could see what a localized firm could be. I practiced in a local firm my whole career. So I can appreciate that. I appreciated being so close to my entrepreneurial clients, having not-for-profit clients along the way, did a little bit of governmental. So I felt like part of the community as part of that. It was a great learning experience.
P
Phil Whitman17:26
Excellent. Switching over to AI, you know, there's a myriad of vendors here in the exhibit halls. Some seemingly overnight have popped up, and some of them are making real tracks. Some of them are very aspirational. But if you were to look into your crystal ball, let's take it forward five years from now when it's the 15th Engage and we do have 10,000 people showing up. What does that exhibit hall look like? Do we have more of those AI vendors, or has there been a little bit of a shakeout? And do you foresee any other changes coming? Because we as a profession, whenever there was an event – Y2K, wonderful event; the dot-com bubble, there were opportunities that arose out of it for CPAs; the maid-off scandal; anytime there was something bad, then we had the housing crisis, and maybe for a short period things were bad, but then things really started to boom after that. We were as a profession able to react to things. Even the pandemic, the PPPs and the EIDLs and the extra work – some firms monetized it, some firms didn't. But in all good economies, bad economies, travesties, tragedies, the CPA has always been very resilient and has come back to be stronger and more profitable. And that was before AI was here. Look into your crystal ball. What do we look like as a profession in five years? Those people that start straight out of school that we just talked about – what are your thoughts on that?
M
Mark Koziel19:14
Yeah. First, to the point of resiliency, we are typically as a profession the last to fall into a recession and the first to come out. So any recessionary period, ours is completely shortened compared to many other things. But that said, we have transformed through all of these technological changes we've been through. This is happening at the fastest pace I've ever seen. It took a while for Excel, took a while for even blockchain – still hasn't really transformed into itself. So it's going to happen incredibly fast. Now, many of the exhibitors who are here today around AI are here around helping us integrate AI into application on audit, tax, which is great. But then there's this bigger ecosystem around AI to capture. There's a lot of conversation around controls over AI. The federal government came out with the Great American AI Act, trying to build a framework and trying to keep the states at bay – over 1,700 proposed AI-related bills around the country right now. It could end up being the Wild West of AI oversight, but we need to be a big part of that. COSO has already put out papers on AI in internal controls for corporations. I envision, because our profession has it all – we have business industry, we have public accounting, the finance teams – I can see them having the burden or the opportunity to manage the controls over AI for their company. And then they also could be the finance partner to help business leads with using AI, ensuring that the AI output they get is appropriate to make decisions on, whether it's the sales team or the production team. The sales team says, 'I want to figure out if this geography is profitable or not profitable, or if I should move into this geography.' So they're going to need help with the prompts. The finance team can work side by side to not only help deliver the prompt and get the information, but then validate the information when it comes out and say, 'Yep, this is going to help you make your decision.' And then from there, the controls over the entire organization and the data they have access to. Then the firm comes in much like we do internal control assurance, now provide assurance over the AI controls to make sure it's appropriate and being able to report on that.
P
Phil Whitman21:42
So now you're the first person that has really shared that vision with me about the CPA appending on the certification of the security of the AI that's in the companies as it relates to governance. As I walk around the exhibit hall, I see, as you said, a lot of application-focused AI companies, but there's no one there – everyone's talking about AI, but there are relatively few people that are really focused on talking about AI governance. We always say you've got to put it in a sandbox, you have to have guardrails. And just to share with you, we actually – they're here. They're a strategic partner. I happen to be introduced to this company called Huge Data Forms. Imagine this CEO, brilliant guy. It's a team of three right now. But he put together an AI, it's called the AI Governance Lab. And what did I do? I called a CTO at a big firm that I knew, and I said, 'Do me a favor. I think there's something amazing here for CPA firms.' And he runs a group of about 200 CTOs across the country. He sat in on a demo, and after the demo he said to me, 'Phil, you are sitting on a gold mine. Every CPA firm needs this. And not only that, it would be an amazing advisory service offering. Every business, every CPA firm needs this.' So AI governance is real. I mean, people don't realize – a partner gives a young kid, 'Hey, here's a letter from the IRS. Write a response for me.' I used to get that kind of stuff. I got a – you know, 'Joe wants me to write, I don't even know where to begin. I've never done this.' Back then I couldn't take it to ChatGPT or Copilot or any one of those large language learning modules, LLM. I always like to throw language in there. I don't know why. But in any event, kit scans that in, that information is out there. So I think people don't realize. I think people are either very impressed with the speed with which they get an answer, which I know sometimes is not the right answer. And the reason they call it large learning modules is because it gets smarter. I tell it, 'No, you're wrong,' or 'What about this? Have you considered this?' 'Oh, you're right, by the way,' and then it becomes smarter and smarter. But AI governance, I think it's critical. I think we're going to see – we've seen rogue AI tools start to buy cryptocurrency on their own and get into people's emails. So I always tell people, you have to be inquisitive, you have to explore this stuff, but you have to be very, very careful.
M
Mark Koziel24:30
Sure.
P
Phil Whitman24:31
So, but I love that. And again, you're the first person that shared that vision.
M
Mark Koziel24:35
Yeah. Big Four are already starting to provide some level of AI assurance over their clients. So it's kind of out there now. This is where I say too, as a profession we also have the responsibility – you have the adoption curve: innovator, early adopter, early majority, late majority, laggard. We're never going to change that. Those are the laggards, the ostriches with their heads in the sand. Not everybody moves at the same speed. So for us, it's not about trying to eliminate or make everybody be an innovator, but to shrink the timeline from beginning to end. Every time some new innovation comes in, we need to get it integrated into the marketplace faster. So how do we get it from the innovators to the early adopters faster? How do we get it from the early adopters to the early majority faster? I think that's our responsibility, to have the tools and resources available so the firms know. And then they also know how many – it used to kill me in the old days. You mentioned PCPS. I had a firm leader call me one time, CEO. He's like, 'We're really struggling with our performance management. I'm wondering if you've seen any best practices out there.' I said, 'Well, this is a large firm, by the way.' I said, 'Actually, PCPS has a performance management tool. I actually wrote it, so I remember it right.' I said, 'It's fantastic.' He's like, 'Oh, that's great.' He looked at it, he reviewed it, he's like, 'Oh my god, this is fantastic. We're going to use it.' But then he asks, 'Who else has used it?' Right? Like he needs that validation even though he sees it as the right tool, but tell me somebody else has used it first.
P
Phil Whitman26:18
Yes. And that mindset – when we initially launched an offshoring partnership, it was Sue Coffey. It was during the pandemic, maybe 2020, 2021, at an AICPA Council meeting. She said, 'With all the PPPs and the EIDLs, there's not going to be enough water to go around.' We went to the Philippines. We found Parker. A year after we inked the agreement, you know how many CPAs from the Philippines we had working with our CPA firms? Absolutely zero. And you know why? Because everyone we talked to said, 'Who else is using it?' The thing that you just said – and then we were fortunate, we had one firm that didn't say that. Today we have about 250 people in the Philippines, and it's been amazing. But AI is coming, right? And I think all these offshoring companies, they also are going to have to – that simulator you talked about – they're going to have to step up those people, otherwise firms aren't going to use them. So as we wrap up, Mark, there are so many different directions I could have taken this, and I've really enjoyed this. Is there anything you'd like to share with our listeners, your thoughts? Anything that I haven't asked you?
M
Mark Koziel27:32
No, I just feel good. I'm excited about the future. There's a reason why I came back to the AICPA. It's my home. I said I was – I made him play 'Aussie Osborne' – 'I'm coming home' at my first meeting. That's awesome. Yeah. So we've done so many things in 18 months. It's amazing to think that's all it is. In the regulatory, we've been all over. It's been great. The legislative team's been fantastic. Meeting with the IRS, we just have so many opportunities. Rise 2040, visioning out 15 years, making sure we're staying on top of it. Excellent. The CPA Trust campaign, especially now – I mentioned the AI Act. There's semblance of verification that they want to put in that. We need to make sure we're at the table as verifiers. 100%. So running a CPA Trust commercial in DC is not a bad idea right now. We were prepared. We were already prepared to do that, and the act drops and it's like, yep, timing couldn't have been better. So for us, it's just re-engaging the profession and making sure that we're all on top of it and being the stewards we need to be, that there are going to be many CPAs that will follow us and be as successful as we are.
P
Phil Whitman28:43
So, awesome. Great. Thank you, Mark. For our listeners out there, it's been a pleasure to be here in Las Vegas at the Aria Hotel. We're with Mark Koziel, CEO of the AICPA. If you've liked this, like it, subscribe, and share it with your friends. And if you're not a member of the AICPA, you're missing out on tremendous opportunities. The collaboration, the networking – it's absolutely worth every penny if you do so. If you're not a member, please, this is what you get. Some wonderful thought leadership with an amazing team behind them. Again, Mark, I thank you so much.
M
Mark Koziel29:25
Thank you, Phil. Thank you, everyone.
P
Phil Whitman29:28
Thank you for tuning in to Everything CPA and Private Equity. Every episode brings fresh insight. However, there's always more to talk about. Don't miss an episode. Subscribe wherever you watch podcasts. Have a question or topic you'd like us to cover? We'd love for you to reach out to us. Together, we will help you navigate this dynamic landscape so that we can help you achieve your goals. Until next time, keep making moves that matter. Thanks for listening, and we'll see you on the next episode.