CEOInterviews.AI
Start App
Ken Griffin
CEO & Founder, Citadel

The Wall Street Strategy That Built a $90B Fortune for Ken Griffin

📅 Jul 31, 2026 The Wealth Shift 63 MIN 7 VIEWS 128 SEGMENTS · 2 SPEAKERS
What separates the world's most successful investors from everyone else? In this insightful lecture, Ken Griffin, founder and CEO of Citadel, shares how some of the greatest opportunities in financial markets arise when other investors are forced to sell. Rather than trying to predict every market move, Griffin explains the importance of liquidity, leverage, risk management, and understanding why prices sometimes become disconnected from value during periods of stress. Whether you're interested in investing, trading, economics, or market structure, this talk offers valuable lessons from one...

What Ken Griffin said

Written from the verified transcript and checked against it. Every figure links to the moment it was said.

Ken Griffin, CEO and founder of Citadel, delivered a keynote at the Economic Club of Chicago, recounting his firm's history and principles. He detailed his start trading convertible bonds from his Harvard dorm room in 1987, raising $265,000, and launching Citadel in 1990 with backing from Frank Meyer. Griffin emphasized hiring talent, citing the 1998 acquisition of Salomon Brothers' fixed income team and the 2001 Enron bankruptcy hiring spree. He described the 2007 Sowood Asset Management portfolio purchase and the 2008 crisis, where Citadel lost half its capital but survived. Griffin then pivoted to civic issues, criticizing Illinois' business climate, broken schools, and pension problems, urging business leaders to engage politically. In Q&A, he defended hedge fund compensation, opposed carried interest tax changes, supported natural gas exports, advocated breaking up too-big-to-fail banks, and criticized QE3 and entitlement spending.

Key takeaways

  1. Citadel lost half its capital in 2008 but survived by selling assets, closing lines, and absorbing $500 million in costs.
  2. He called QE3 a 'terrible idea' and warned the Fed is becoming captive to political institutions.
  3. Griffin said Illinois has over $100 billion in unfunded pension commitments and needs a 'grown-up conversation' about benefits.
  4. He stated that in 10 years, all federal income tax revenue will go to Medicaid, Medicare, Social Security, and debt interest.

Numbers and commitments

FigureWhat it refers toTypeAt
$265,000 Initial capital raised from friends and family for his first hedge fund metric 3:28
5,000 Interviews conducted by one business head over a decade metric 7:53
$30 billion Sowood Asset Management portfolio acquired overnight metric 9:33
$13 billion Trading profits earned in the 24 months preceding 2008 metric 13:27
$500 million Costs absorbed by management team during 2008 crisis commitment 15:14
100 million Shares traded daily in primary asset management business metric 36:02
25,000 Resumes received per year metric 39:16
10,000 Management meetings per year by equities team metric 40:00
47 million Americans on food stamps metric 1:01:45

Chapters

  1. 0:00Early life and first trades
  2. 5:29Starting Citadel and hiring talent
  3. 8:48Sowood crisis and hustle
  4. 13:272008 financial crisis and survival
  5. 17:26Chicago's civic decline and call to action
  6. 27:47Hedge fund compensation and carried interest
  7. 30:17Energy policy and natural gas exports
  8. 31:32Banking regulation and too big to fail
  9. 34:56High-frequency trading and technology
  10. 45:51Federal Reserve policy and QE3

Questions asked in this interview

12
  1. 27:47What is your response to the claim about compensation industry and that hedge fund managers make too much money?
  2. 28:41And the current administration would like to get those of us who toil hard for that capital gain treatment to pay ordinary income. Do you have a view?
  3. 31:32What are the implications and how is this impacting our market, your business and investors overall?
  4. 33:00So, how do we do it?
  5. 33:57Do you think it was a mistake to let Lehman Brothers fail?
  6. 34:56What the hell is high—what is high-frequency trading and what impact does it have on the markets?
  7. 38:34So, do you consider yourself a technology company?
  8. 41:57How do you spend your day? What do you do?
  9. 43:46Do you have trouble attracting them to Illinois and to Chicago?
  10. 45:51And by the way, do you think these Fed policies are healthy, unhealthy?
  11. 50:58Do you see much of an issue about unwinding QE3?
  12. 52:56How big a problem is this in your view?
Ken Griffin 0:00 ↗
I'm delighted to be here tonight to share with you the history of Citadel, how we rose, how we prospered, how we nearly failed, and how we recovered to prosper again. I'm going to focus on three important concepts, three themes that are part of our story: the importance of talent, the importance of execution, the importance of taking decisive action, and how these three themes can guide us in achieving the mission of the Economic Club of Chicago, which is to address the important economic and social questions of the day. Before I begin with the history of Citadel, I think it might be helpful to share a bit about myself. Let's take a journey back through time.
Yes. This is me on the beach as a young boy with the business section of the paper. And here's a report that I wrote in sixth grade where I set out to understand how the stock market works. I'm still working on this 30 years later. And since my teenage years, I've had a love for computers. Next to the definition of geek, you could find my picture. In fact, here it is. Yeah, I do look like a geek there.
In 1986, I went off to Harvard to study economics. And in the middle of the winter, there was a great story published in Forbes about Home Shopping Network. Now, Home Shopping Network was going to change the world, or so said the bulls who bid the stock up 500% from the time of the IPO. But the author Gretchen Morgenson made a compelling argument that the stock was a fad and ripe for a correction. I really liked her argument and I bought two put contracts on Home Shopping Network, effectively betting the stock would fall, and fortuitously within days of doing so the stock did collapse and I made a few thousand, which as a college freshman that is all the money in the world.
Now, when I went to liquidate my options, the market maker paid me $50 less than their intrinsic value. And his trading approach really got me interested in learning about the pricing of derivatives. I used to walk across the river to Harvard Business School where I'd spend hours in the library reading books on derivatives and trying to understand the pricing and financial theory behind derivatives. And I came across a strategy known as convertible bond arbitrage.
Now I'm in Boston. I'm a kid in college. I'm pretty resourceful. I called a broker at First Boston to ask for advice on this strategy that I came across. And this gentleman, Doug Snider, was quite generous with his time. He said, 'Look, this is really not a strategy that our clients do, but the firm does it with our own money.' Now, I may have been young. I may have been naive, but I was no fool. If this is good enough for the firm's money, this is what I want to do with my money. So, with two friends, we started a small hedge fund in 1987.
We raised $265,000 from friends and family. And yes, I started it in my dorm room. Now, I was armed with all the modern technology today. I had a fax. I had a phone. I had an IBM PS2 personal computer. And it is true. I put a satellite dish on top of the building, ran the cable through an old unused elevator shaft, pulled it through a window and into my dorm room so I could have real-time stock quotes. I had all the technology to begin my career as a hedge fund manager.
And it was the perfect fit for me. It was a chance for me to marry my interest in the markets with my passion for technology. Technology that was used to compute the pricing relationship between convertible bonds and the underlying stock. Now, we started just weeks before the crash of '87. I didn't see the crash coming, but the portfolio that I had built would benefit from periods of market volatility. The portfolio did well and people took note and soon we were managing a million dollars of capital.
Now as I approached graduation something very fortunate happened in my life. I was introduced to Frank Meyer, fellow Chicagoan. Frank was the co-founder of Glenwood Partners based here in our great city. He was also a pioneer investor in hedge funds and he offered me an opportunity to come to Chicago and to join him at Glenwood. It was a pretty simple proposition. I could manage a small pool of capital for Glenwood. If I did well, I could leave. I could start my own firm and he'd be my partner in doing so. If performance wasn't so good, I would pick a different path in life. As he said, you can always go back to business school.
But Frank offered more than capital and more than moral support. He gave me great advice. He said, 'Don't focus on just a single investment strategy. Focus on building a firm, a platform that attracts the best and brightest people and that deploys capital across an array of investment strategies. Think big.' And I took his advice to heart and I spent a lot of time focusing on hiring the best and brightest people.
Well, with Frank's support in the November of 1990, I did launch Citadel and within a few short years, Citadel was engaged in a wide variety of investment strategies such as Japanese equity warrant arbitrage, merger arbitrage, and statistical equity arbitrage.
Let's talk about what hiring the best and brightest looks like in practice. There's the great stories. 1998, for example, Jamie Dimon shut down Solomon Brothers' legendary fixed income trading team and we swooped in and hired five of the seven most senior people from that team. In 2001, Enron collapsed and the day they filed for bankruptcy, we flew 16 people to Houston to interview every single talented person we could get our hands on. And we picked up some really incredible people.
There's a great Enron story. One of the senior professionals there who ran a big part of the trading floor. She stood up on top of her desk that morning and told the employees at Enron that they would survive. They will persevere. They will make it through this crisis. And as she's telling this story with all of her heart and soul, behind her on the TV is the breaking news story of their bankruptcy filing. It wasn't really her finest moment, but shortly thereafter, we went to Aquila, which had shut down their energy trading operation, and we did something quite unconventional. We paid the company a few million dollars to be able to interview all 600 of their energy trading professionals. And again, we picked up some really incredible people. And they helped us build what is today one of the most successful energy trading operations in the world.
And then there's just plain effort. One of my business heads kept meticulous records of the interviews that he conducted over the course of a decade. In 10 years, he interviewed 5,000 people. It works out to two a day. A day in his life. Research, trade, manage, interview, repeat.
But talent is everything. And if you want to build a great business, I think you need to heed the advice of Jim Collins. Get the right people on the bus, the wrong people off the bus, and the right people in the right seats. And the right people are capable of great accomplishments.
On a Sunday morning in the summer of 2007, one of my partners received a call from one of the two heads of Sowood Asset Management, a competitor of ours based in Boston. Sowood had a very large and complex book of credit-related instruments. And as the credit crisis started to unfold, they found their portfolio did not behave as expected. They had lost hundreds of millions of dollars in the blink of an eye and they needed to liquidate almost all their portfolio before the open of business on Monday to meet margin calls.
We assembled a 50-person team as fast as we could. We flew eight people to Boston to facilitate due diligence and information sharing. To acquire some or all of their $30 billion portfolio overnight was going to be a herculean task. Now, Sowood brought in another large bank to provide a competing solution or potentially to partner with us. We worked feverishly through the day and into the night. And I still remember that night, the senior point person on the deal from the other bank calling me from what I'm sure was his beautiful house in Greenwich. And it was certainly a beautiful house in Greenwich. And he said, 'Look, it's getting late. This isn't going to get done tonight. I'm heading off to bed. I'm telling my guys to go home and we'll pick this up in the morning.' And I said, 'There will be nothing to pick up in the morning. We're going to get this done.' He sort of laughed and hung up.
6:00 a.m. before the opening of the markets, we bought that entire portfolio. We bought the entire portfolio. Sowood crisis. Which brings me to a quote that describes the ethos of Citadel. 'Things may come to those who wait, but only those things left by those who hustle.' Now, here's what I really love about this quote. Who said this? It was one of our country's greatest leaders. It was President Abraham Lincoln who, like us, calls Illinois home.
Going the extra mile, doing what it takes, always being active. This is what has driven our success. It often seems chaotic, frenetic. It's not like the well-oiled machine you envision when you read the business books. It's not. It's not.
I remember discussing the topic of what great businesses felt like with Jack Welch's former head of human resources. You know, GE bought hundreds of companies. They've seen it all. They've seen great companies. They've seen bankrupt companies. And I asked, 'What do the great companies feel like compared to the bankrupt companies?' I really wanted to know. And they said, 'Look, the great companies all felt pretty much the same.' He said, 'Imagine you're in a Formula 1 car and you're hurtling down the straightaway at 225 miles an hour and the corner is coming up and you're full on on the brakes. The tires are squealing. They're locking up. You're trying to pull the car around the corner. You're sliding up towards the wall. You just missed the wall as you get through the corner, and then you're back on the gas hurtling towards that next corner as fast as you possibly can.' He said, 'That's what our great companies all felt like.' It was a sobering moment.
I said, 'Well, what did the companies that you bought out of bankruptcy feel like?' He goes, 'Well, that's easy. Picture you're in a big Cadillac. The top's down, the sun's shining, and you're going down the road in Texas on the highway at 60 miles an hour. And you know what everyone says at those companies? Geez, what happened?' You see, great companies are always pushing themselves. They're always on the edge, and the great firms are never satisfied.
Now, with great talent and great execution, you are still going to face challenges that will test you, decisions you'd rather not make. In the 24 months preceding 2008, we earned 13 billion dollars of trading profits. I'll put this in perspective. That's more money than Amazon.com has made in its entire history. We had built one of the world's most successful trading operations and we ran one of the largest balance sheets outside of the banking system.
Our success drove our confidence. More profoundly, it drove our overconfidence. And not foreseeing the financial crisis of 2008 was the greatest mistake of my career. You see, we are paid to see the unforeseen and I did not grasp the magnitude and depth of the financial crisis that was growing in our banking system. A crisis so large that virtually every bank in America would have failed if the government had not intervened. Every bank would have failed. And after Lehman failed, we found ourselves fighting for our very survival. We were caught in the maelstrom. We were losing hundreds of millions of dollars a week, if not more.
CNBC parked a van in front of Citadel waiting to break the story of our demise. But we weren't going to give them that story. You see, each day we took the steps needed to keep our business going. We sold assets. We closed business lines. We let people go. We suspended redemptions. Our management team absorbed $500 million of costs on behalf of our investors to demonstrate our commitment to the business and our belief in the future. And each thing we did bought us one more day. And day by day, we bought ourselves a future. Often the choice was between painful and more painful. But the one thing we didn't do was put things off.
By the end of 2008, we had lost half our capital, but we were still in business and we kept our team and our team kept fighting to buy us another day. You see, with the right people, with the ability to execute, and with the willingness to make the tough decisions, we were able to save our firm.
I believe Andrew Carnegie had it right when he said, 'Take away my factories, my plants, take away my railroads, my ships, my transportation. Take away my money. Strip me of all these, but leave me my people and in two or three years I will have them all again.' We know these three principles are true everywhere. Great talent, great execution, a willingness to confront difficult choices. We know these ideas apply universally.
Consider how these principles have driven the birth and rise of our city. Chicago was incorporated in 1837. In just 30 years, Chicago became the fifth largest city in the United States in 30 years. And then tragedy struck. The great fire laid our city to waste. It is impossible for me to fathom the difficult decisions that our city's leaders faced in those days. The East Coast newspapers speculated that Chicago was finished. But Chicago had great leaders. One of them, Joseph Medill, wrote an editorial in the Chicago Tribune rallying our citizens. 'All is not lost. Chicago still exists. The lake, the spacious harbor, the vast empire of production, the great arteries of trade and commerce all remain. We have lost money, but we have saved life, health, vigor, and industry.' In 1871, our city lay in ashes, and by 1890, Chicago was the second largest city in America.
The commitment that rebuilt Chicago is still with us today. I remember Andy McKenna, former CEO of McDonald's, taking me to lunch a decade ago. And Andy, I'm going to recognize your presence here because I greatly appreciate this lunch. It was something very special. He spoke with me about how those who had come before him contributed to our great city and how the duty of civic and commercial leadership flows from one generation to another. It's a duty shared by each of us in this room. And you can see our commitment everywhere. You can see it in our great hospitals, in museums that are the envy of the world and our world-leading universities. We have created one of the greatest cities in the world. One that we are all proud to call home, with one exception: our politics.
There we've gone silent in the face of challenge. Every person in this room is painfully aware, painfully aware of our broken schools, our bankrupt pension plans, our rising crime rates, and our declining tax base. I'm sure we all feel some shame that three of our five last governors have been indicted. That we have plummeted from 8th to 48th as a state in which to do business in one decade.
A friend of mine was recently at an event for young entrepreneurs, like the best and brightest in our city and the future of our great city. And sorry, a story wasn't funny to share is sort of as follows. The question was posed to these young entrepreneurs, the individuals who we look to to help create our future. 'Have you considered leaving our state because of our business environment?' And what percent of the people in that room raised their hand and said yes? Half. Half our future is thinking about walking out of our great state. You know, when we look at the facts, it's like we've opted out of caring about the governance of this great state and this extraordinary city. And we permit this. We permit this.
In the last election cycle, I called a local CEO to talk to him about supporting a pro-business candidate. We're aligned on the values of what a good candidate should look like. That wasn't a point of contention, but his answer was straightforward and simple. No. No, I'm not going to write a check. You see, if Illinois is not hospitable to my business, we're just going to move. And then I learned what the word hospitable meant. For a few weeks later, it was announced that his company received tens of millions of dollars of tax incentives. And his silence was bought and paid for.
This story is sadly not unique. As the Tribune has reported, our state has given away tax breaks to countless Illinois companies. Now, here's a partial list.
What is the cost of this cronyism? It is far higher than the lost tax revenues. It is the devastating loss of leadership from our business community. Edmund Burke wrote, 'All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.' And we are good men and good women. And it is time for us to do something. You see, we have a powerful voice, a voice that can play an important role in fixing our schools, in protecting and providing for our retirees and in creating good jobs. A voice that can't wait until the next election cycle. A voice that must be heard now. We need to pick up the phone. We need to pick up the pen. We need to reach out to Governor Quinn and Mayor Emanuel and Speaker Madigan and our legislators and insist that they make the tough choices that will buy our state another day.
And day by day, we will secure ourselves a future. And let me be clear, the city of Chicago is counting on us. Before us, a generation of leaders made Chicago what it is today, and it falls to us to carry their work forward. Who else can do this? We have the relationships, the expertise, the experience, and yes, we have the means to do what is required to save Chicago from decline. And not just to save Chicago, but to make Chicago better. We must be the ones who do this work. We must fight for the ideals and principles which are at the heart of this great city and our great state. It is our duty and it shall be our legacy. Thank you.
Unknown 26:14 ↗
That's a pretty thunderous applause.
I'm going to get on that. That was spectacular.
And I know you don't speak often as you said to me, never. So I want to thank our own Michael Pharaoh for talking into doing this. And as you can see as soon as we announced it, we sold out the whole place. And I don't think anybody's unhappy that they came here tonight. So thank you very much, Ken.
Ken Griffin 27:03 ↗
John, thank you. Thank you so much. Tonight, I do think in preparation for tonight's speech, I learned a very valuable lesson. For all the parents in this room who have young children, save those artifacts. Mom, I greatly... My mom's here. Would you mind sitting up, Mom? It was a fantastic trip through memory lane to just appreciate how far back my passion in finance goes. Thank you for saving all those memories of our lives. Thank you, Mom.
Unknown 27:37 ↗
Well, after doing us such a great favor, and I want to in advance apologize to your mom for this first question.
Ken Griffin 27:45 ↗
Now, I'm getting scared.
Unknown 27:47 ↗
What is your response to the claim about compensation industry and that hedge fund managers make too much money?
Ken Griffin 27:55 ↗
That's an interesting question. So, I'll be succinct in my answer. Most of the income that you see reported in the newspapers for hedge fund managers relates to the return on their own invested capital in their funds. That for almost all the managers is the vast majority of their income. Now let me be clear. The top firms that are wildly successful for their investors have created some vast fortunes in our country. And it's the nature of the inherent alignment of interests that when we are successful in creating wealth for the endowments and foundations that entrust us with their capital, we're well rewarded for doing that.
Unknown 28:41 ↗
Hey, I'm on your side here. Do you have a view on the taxation of carried interest? For those who may not know, carried interest is the percentage that fund managers receive on the gains of money they manage for limited partners. And in some cases, it's taxed as capital gains, not ordinary income. And the current administration would like to get those of us who toil hard for that capital gain treatment to pay ordinary income. Do you have a view?
Ken Griffin 29:14 ↗
I have a pretty straightforward view. So, first of all, almost all the income that we generate is short-term in nature. So, my tax rate's pretty much the highest federal marginal rate. So, I don't have a lot of skin in the game on this issue from my personal vantage point, but I have an interest in this from a matter of principle. In our country, our tax code favors the creation of wealth. It favors the creation of long-term capital gains. And so long as that is the basis of our tax code, the nature of the income that is created should flow through to those who create it. And so in your business in which you buy and sell companies that you spend years working to make better, when you create long-term capital gains, I don't see why your long-term capital gains should be treated differently than anybody else. It's populist. It makes for some really good rhetoric, but it doesn't make for fairness.
Unknown 30:10 ↗
You were right on the money there. Now I'll get easier questions for the next 20 minutes.
Ken Griffin 30:16 ↗
Yeah, now I'm going to soften up.
Unknown 30:17 ↗
Citadel has a robust energy business. What is your view on the US energy policy and energy independence and should we be exporting natural gas around the world?
Ken Griffin 30:28 ↗
That's a great question and we do trade a tremendous amount of natural gas and oil around the world. For all of us in this room, the revolution of fracking is a near miracle. It means that the United States has an opportunity to be free of dependency in the rest of the world for energy, which is a matter of national security is priceless. Now, having said that, there's quite a bit of debate as to whether or not we should export our natural gas to the rest of the world where it trades at about three times the price. And the answer to that, if we believe in free markets, is we absolutely should. Our country should do everything it can possibly do to maximize the value of its resources. And if we build a larger industrial base in the back of an artificially depressed price of input, we will find that industrial base stranded at that point in time in the future when markets do equilibrate. And markets in the long run do equilibrate.
Unknown 31:32 ↗
Now there's been a lot of discussion about too big to fail and regulations in our banking system. What are the implications and how is this impacting our market, your business and investors overall?
Ken Griffin 31:47 ↗
You know, regrettably, one of the outcomes of the financial crisis of 2008 was a dramatic consolidation within our banking industry. Firms like Wachovia acquired by Wells Fargo. And it has greatly reduced the competition amongst our banks. And we all know that when markets are less competitive, consumers lose. It's just that simple. Now, how can I sit here and talk about why we should break up our too big to fail banks? I'm a free market advocate. Banks are not free market institutions. Every bank has a seal on its front door says FDIC insured. It's a huge subsidy from our government. Huge subsidy. And because our banking system relies upon the faith and credit of our government, we have an obligation as society to make sure that we maintain that part of our commercial realm, a competitive, vibrant commercial realm. We need to break up our banks that are too big to fail. No company in America deserves the privilege of being too big to fail. None.
Unknown 33:00 ↗
So, how do we do it?
Ken Griffin 33:06 ↗
We limit the size of the deposit base as a percentage of total national deposits.
Unknown 33:13 ↗
And do we also limit the activities that you can use with those insured deposits?
Ken Griffin 33:18 ↗
In my opinion, and we refer to this as narrow banking in the industry, the answer is yes. I find it, for example, absolutely ludicrous that Goldman Sachs is viewed as a bank. Nothing against my friends and colleagues at Goldman Sachs, but you don't deserve the taxpayer support in running your business. You run a trading firm, trading firm of highly paid, highly gifted professionals. You shouldn't be entitled to a taxpayer safety net. It's not fair to the taxpayers and it's not fair to their competitors who don't have that safety net.
Unknown 33:45 ↗
Well, you referred to this a little in your speech that basically I think you take the position that every bank could have failed and that's why Goldman became a bank over
Do you think it was a mistake to let Lehman Brothers fail?
Ken Griffin 34:04 ↗
It was not a mistake to let Lehman Brothers fail. It wasn't. It was a complete catastrophe at Lehman Brothers. It would have required endless amounts of taxpayer dollars to make the creditors Lehman whole. And what we have lost sight of is that market discipline is a really important function. When companies aren't poorly managed, they fail and that releases the resources that are trapped in poorly running businesses to explore and undertake new opportunities. We need to embrace that dynamicism of capitalism. You see it in the industrial base. We need to see it in our financial services base where companies that outcompete their competition win and companies that fail to do so lose. And regrettably in business, we know that losing means bankruptcy.
Unknown 34:56 ↗
Let me switch gears a little bit. You know, I'm just a private equity guy trying to get through the day. What the hell is high—what is high-frequency trading and what impact does it have on the markets?
Ken Griffin 35:08 ↗
You know, high-frequency trading is like the favorite buzzword of the journalist. It's the cause of all problems in a day where the market goes down. In English, it's electronic market making. Firms such as Citadel make markets in thousands of stocks on the back of very specialized computer systems that transmit the information across all assets in the market to all their assets.
Let me put that in English. That means that when you trade IBM, you see a bid-ask spread today of about two cents. When I used to trade out of my dorm room, the bid-ask spread in IBM was between 25 cents and 50 cents. And when you went to do that trade with a specialist in the New York Stock Exchange, you got to wait a few minutes to get a response back. Today, if you jump on to Scottrade's website and trade IBM, you get a response back in about one second.
Now, I'm going to talk about the good old days of trading, the early days of Citadel. We used to keep replacement phones. Why? Because people would lose their mind when taken advantage of by floor traders, the New York Stock Exchange, and break phones. I can't actually own up to having broken a phone myself, but I've tried. Now, since the advent of electronic markets, not a single phone's been broken at Citadel. Not one. We trade 100 million shares a day in our primary asset management business. No raised voices, no high blood pressure, no anger over a specialist taking advantage of you for a quarter or an eighth. But nonetheless, every time the market has a bad day, it must be these electronic market makers that the press doesn't really understand, but loves to blame for all the problems.
Unknown 37:04 ↗
So, you referred to the fact that you had a satellite link installed in your dorm room in order to access market data on a real time.
Ken Griffin 37:12 ↗
Just to be clear, I installed that.
Unknown 37:13 ↗
You installed—
Ken Griffin 37:14 ↗
I installed—this is the one time in my life I actually like used—
Unknown 37:17 ↗
I didn't mean to imply that you hired—
Ken Griffin 37:18 ↗
No, I want to own this because I really can't make anything work. If you need something fixing in your house, don't call me. I did make the satellite dish work.
Unknown 37:26 ↗
That's impressive.
Ken Griffin 37:29 ↗
Not particularly, but I want to own this moment.

31 more exchanges in this transcript

Sign in free to read the rest of this interview. No card required.

Sign in to read the full transcript

Cite this transcript

APA, MLA, BibTeX
APA

Griffin, K. (2026, July 31). The Wall Street Strategy That Built a $90B Fortune for Ken Griffin [Interview transcript]. The Wealth Shift. CEOInterviews.AI. https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/1164356/

MLA

Ken Griffin. "The Wall Street Strategy That Built a $90B Fortune for Ken Griffin." The Wealth Shift, 31 Jul. 2026. Transcript, CEOInterviews.AI, https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/1164356/.

BibTeX
@misc{griffin2026_1164356,
  author       = {Ken Griffin},
  title        = {The Wall Street Strategy That Built a $90B Fortune for Ken Griffin},
  howpublished = {Interview transcript, The Wealth Shift. CEOInterviews.AI},
  year         = {2026},
  month        = {jul},
  url          = {https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/1164356/},
  note         = {Speaker-attributed transcript with timestamps}
}