CEOInterviews.AI
Start App
Will Marshall
Co-Founder & Chief Executive Officer, Planet Labs PBC

Planetary Intelligence, Lecture by Will Marshall

📅 Jun 24, 2026 OxfordSmithSchool 55 MIN 111 SEGMENTS · 11 SPEAKERS
In this special lecture, Will Marshall, Co-Founder and CEO of Planet, explores "Planetary Intelligence" — how Earth observation ...

What Will Marshall said

Written from the verified transcript and checked against it. Every figure links to the moment it was said.

Will Marshall, co-founder and CEO of Planet Labs, delivered a lecture at Oxford on planetary intelligence, the fusion of Earth observation and AI. He described Planet's mission to image the entire Earth daily, enabled by a 1,000x improvement in satellite capability per kilogram and lower launch costs. He detailed applications in agriculture, disaster response, security, and sustainability, including a partnership with John Deere, monitoring Ukraine, and helping Brazil reduce deforestation by 60%. Marshall introduced a private beta app that merges LLMs with satellite data for natural language search of the planet, and discussed edge computing on satellites with Google's Suncatcher project. He argued that satellite data is the core corpus for large Earth models, and speculated on AI consciousness and the importance of sensory data. He also addressed orbital debris, privacy, and the deterrent value of transparency.

Key takeaways

  1. Planet's next scan system will provide 1-meter daily imagery of the whole planet with half-hour latency, a 10x improvement in data and latency.
  2. Brazil's federal police, using Planet data, have confiscated $3 billion in illegal mining and narcotics equipment and reduced deforestation by 60%.
  3. Planet is working with Google on Suncatcher, flying TPUs in space, which could be cheaper than ground data centers when launch costs fall to $200-300 per kilogram.
  4. Planet's private beta app enables natural language search of the entire Earth in about a second, merging LLMs with satellite data.
  5. Planet's Pelican spacecraft will improve resolution from 50 centimeters to 30 centimeters, and the hyperspectral imager has 400 bands.

Numbers and commitments

FigureWhat it refers toTypeAt
60% reduction in deforestation rates in Brazil metric 11:29
$3 billion value of illegal mining and narcotics equipment confiscated metric 11:29
1,000 times improvement in satellite capability per kilogram over 10 years metric 46:31
50 centimeters current high-resolution imaging resolution metric 8:11
30 centimeters planned resolution for Pelican spacecraft guidance 27:19
1 meter planned resolution for next daily scan system guidance 27:48
10 times improvement in data collected and latency for next scan system metric 27:48
400 bands spectral bands of hyperspectral imager metric 27:19
10 times per day current imaging frequency for high-resolution system metric 44:57

Chapters

  1. 0:00Introduction and mission
  2. 6:31Satellite technology and fleet
  3. 8:43Applications in agriculture and disaster response
  4. 9:52Security and Ukraine monitoring
  5. 10:52Sustainability and carbon monitoring
  6. 13:46AI and planetary intelligence
  7. 18:59Edge computing and space data centers
  8. 21:32AI consciousness and alignment
  9. 27:14Q&A on data improvements and competition
  10. 30:44Q&A on geopolitics and debris

Questions asked in this interview

12
  1. 30:44How's that going to develop, do you think?
  2. 32:14If there was another conflict, wouldn't the invading force kind of do something about that capability and degrade your capability?
  3. 32:41Say more about what that is?
  4. 34:55What do you do about it?
  5. 36:02Have you done any work tuning, validating flood models?
  6. 37:18And how far back does the data record go from the satellites?
  7. 40:28Since the satellite can take images for the entire world every day, so ideally is it possible at the end of the day I just ask, just tell me what's anything new happening in this world?
  8. 43:07How do you think that's going to kind of unlock capabilities and who's going to build these things?
  9. 44:35And are there implications on not just security, but also privacy?
  10. 45:59What's the landscape like right now?
  11. 47:53So are you actually seeing a kind of greater accessibility and better question asking already or is it too early?
  12. 50:36So, let's do 30 by 30, but the kind of point being nature's often kind of considered the poorer cousin, but if this is a very tangible and practical way to measure progress, is that something you've considered?
Ben Caldecott 0:00 ↗
Hi everyone. Welcome to Oriel College. My name is Ben Caldecott. I direct something called the Oxford Sustainable Finance Group based at a bit of the university called the Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment. And we're hosting this lecture today at Oriel in collaboration with the Oriel Environment Group because it's the 700th year anniversary of the college, and as part of the kind of celebrations, a variety of lectures being held here on the environment, and so that's part of this series.
And it's a great pleasure to have Will Marshall here, who's going to give us this lecture. And Will is the co-founder and CEO of a company called Planet, a publicly listed company based in San Francisco, and they operate the world's largest constellation of Earth observation satellites imaging the entire land surface of the planet every single day at a high resolution and different spectral bands. And you're going to hear more about those capabilities shortly.
Now, Will is a physicist by training, did his doctorate here at Oxford, so it's great to welcome him back here. Now, why does this matter? And why is it a great pleasure to host Will at Oxford? So, in our research group focused on finance and sustainability, we have something called the Spatial Finance Initiative which is working to bring geospatial data and analysis into financial theory and practice. So, we rely on the data that Planet and other Earth observation companies and providers create and disseminate.
But, we're not the only people in the university, of course, that draw on these capabilities to understand what's going on in the world and where it might be going. So, some examples. So, colleagues in archaeology use this imagery and this analysis to find archaeological sites, to monitor damage to heritage in conflict zones, for example. We have colleagues working in international relations and security, researchers tracking what's going on in conflict areas, and obviously what we see day-to-day in the news in Ukraine, for example. A lot of that is satellite imagery, a lot of that's coming from Planet.
There are also people working on humanitarian questions, mapping refugee camps as they grow and assessing damage after floods and earthquakes. We have economists and development researchers applying this to development economics, measuring urban growth, mapping poverty. And we also have colleagues in natural sciences, including Yadvinder Malhi, who's here at Oriel, who are monitoring deforestation, land use change, biodiversity, tracking floods, water scarcity, and also methane leaks from facilities. So, a whole range of different use cases, and that's just scratching the surface.
The availability of current and historical Earth observation data at the quality and scale that's now possible because of Planet and other providers is revolutionizing whole fields of study and opening up new ones. So, being up to speed with all of these developments means a great deal to us as scholars and researchers, which is one of the reasons why we're obviously very happy to have Will today.
The other thing I wanted to briefly mention, obviously Will and Planet also sit at the intersection of two really important economic, financial, and technological forces at the moment and into the future, and those are of course space and artificial intelligence. Today is a big day if you're interested in that intersection. If you're interested in seeing those forces at play in financial markets with the SpaceX listing today, the world's largest IPO, the largest IPO in history.
And some of you in about 30 minutes, 23 minutes when markets open, might directly own a stake in SpaceX, and those of you who don't will basically automatically have exposure to that through passive funds in the next 2 to 3 weeks as those passive funds are forced to buy into that stock. So, there are literally trillions of dollars on the line in relation to space and AI. And Planet in a way is part of that interest.
So, I'm sort of hoping that we'll in addition to his lecture and the Q&A, there might be some questions related to all of that. So, it's very exciting stuff. Great to have you here. Will's going to speak for about 30, 35 minutes. We've then got time for Q&A. And then we've managed to organize a reception in the quad that you came through, a Pimm's reception. A bit early, but it is a Friday in summer, and I'm told it's not going to rain. So, hopefully you can stay around for that. Without further ado, over to you, Will. Thank you.
Will Marshall 4:51 ↗
Thanks, everyone. Thanks, Ben. I also wanted to start a little bit with why it all matters. And I love this picture that was taken not by Apollo astronauts, but just the astronauts around the moon just a few weeks ago. And it was cool because just like the Apollo astronauts, they reminded us we live on this little fragile planet in the vastness of space, and it's very unique. And I actually sent two probes to the moon when I was at NASA. One that found water on the South Pole of the moon is very exciting. Makes it easier to potentially put people there more long term and stuff. But whilst I was doing that, my co-founder Robbie was working on a mission that was looking at exasolar planets. So, planets around nearby star systems. And it went on to find thousands of said planets. But I'm here to tell you unequivocally that this one's the best one.
So, we started Planet with a mission of helping us to take care of the Earth knowing that you can't manage what you don't measure. And in particular, measuring things on a human time scale means measuring them on a human time scale. And so, we took it upon ourselves to set the goal of imaging the entire world every day.
Yeah, that was where we were going. Oh, I see. You have to sit there, do you? You have to. So, just stand there. You're right spot. Image the whole world. Yeah, it looks like it needs line of sight. Okay. And make it accessible to everyone. And I'm going to be talking a little bit about that today. And it has a lot of different applications because of digital transformation, sustainability, and peace and security.
Okay. And what's underlying this, just a tiny bit of background on space, is we've seen rocket costs come down. You've heard about that with SpaceX. We've seen about the four to five times cost reduction in launch cost. But, the less known fact is how much improvement we've seen in cost capability of satellites. Over the same period about the last 10 years, we've seen about a thousand times improvement in the capability you can put in each kilogram that goes on that launch fairing. And that's really what's underpinning the proliferation of satellites that we see now in space.
And all of it leads to more data. And more data either being transported around the planet with things like Starlink or OneWeb or being taken off the planet. So, the upshot is a data revolution. We spent a lot of years trying to miniaturize our satellites. And then we launched them on lots of rockets. And this one was just a couple months ago from Vandenberg Air Force Base taking some of our latest satellites into space. It's cool to be able to go and see those. And we took some of our latest customers to see it as well.
And this little video shows the satellites popped out. That's one of our satellites. They popped out in space. It's almost like a bus ticket these days and it's very different from when I started my career in space. So, and then what they do all together, hopefully this will play, is they act like a line scanner for the planet. So, they're all in a polar orbit. Each one takes a strip of images as it goes around, but the earth rotates underneath. So, the next one comes along takes a strip slightly next to the prior one such that over 24 hours the earth does the legwork during the rotation. And the satellites stay in a sun-synchronous orbit.
We have a bunch of other satellites that image in different areas. So, this is our complete fleet. So, we do have a daily scan satellite of Doves. SkySats are higher resolution systems at 50 centimeters. Tanagers are our first hyperspectral satellite. We're launching a couple more of those this year. They can track permissions. And Pelicans are our new high resolution satellite fleet. And it gives us gobs of data. So much data that most people can't use it, which is why I'm going to talk about AI and how that's going to help make it easier.
And we serve that all up on a platform. And it has various applications and I'll just talk you through a few very quickly because I want to get on to where AI and satellite data are going, but we do a fair bit of work in agriculture helping farmers around the world improve crop yields across millions of farms. We can tell the crop type and crop yield in each 3-meter box of the farm field. We just announced a partnership last week, for example, with John Deere. They're using it for precision farming of their tractors.
We do a fair bit of work in fire prevention by monitoring people's electrical power lines across California, for example, to look for encroachment of trees onto power lines. We do things like, I'm not sure if I agree with this, but stopping cannabis growing in Humboldt County. This is legal, but they have to have a permit and they don't often get their permits because they're lazy and we catch them. And drought insurance. So, instead of having people going out to the field, AXA and Swiss Re actually just do it automatically from their laptops.
We do a fair bit of stuff in disaster response. So, this is the Lahaina fire. FEMA used this. The American Red Cross used it to help save lives. We do a lot of work with Ukraine. We're the only ones that monitor all of Ukraine every day, all of Russia every day, helping them track security threats coming their way. Including this, which was the first bridge that Mr. Putin and his team built across a river between Belarus and Ukraine. The day when he said, 'No, we're not going to invade.' And then we were like, 'Well, what's this then?' There's a bridge to bring troops across into Ukraine.
And ever since we've been helping them building damages assessment for the UN Development Program and have an active standing here for formerly at the UN monitoring the health of all the crops across all of Ukraine for the World Food Program and things like that. And shedding light on this for everyone to see, trying to get at the truth about what's going on the planet.
We do a fair bit of work in sustainability which was obviously relevant here today. Through these what we call digital public goods projects. So, in this case, we've mapped all the world's coral reef systems and give alerts of bleaching events and fishing vessels that shouldn't be in marine protected areas. We help another UN program track deforestation across 64 countries, UN FAO. And this little file here that's probably not going to show is showing some of our work in tracking deforestation across the Brazilian Amazon.
And this is the upshot statistics that over the last 3 years, so Brazil Federal Police, we find illegal logging roads, illegal narcotics, illegal mines, and then they actually send people up to these places where we alert them about. They do that about a dozen times per day, and they've confiscated now $3 billion worth of illegal mining and other narcotics and deforestation equipment. Sometimes they send us the imagery, they blow up these machines because they can't confiscate them. They just put TNT on it. But most importantly, we've helped them to reduce deforestation rates about 60%.
This is our first work in global carbon. So, this is a map of all the carbon at the individual tree level across the planet, and we produce a quarterly map of every tree on the planet, how much carbon is in that to underpin and hopefully help carbon markets, and that's partly why we're here.
And the Tanager spacecraft can monitor emissions. So, it's a hyperspectral satellite. Methane sticks out like a sore thumb in a few of the very specific spectral bands. So, this mission looks along oil and gas pipelines, fire and waste facilities, and other things. Finds emissions, and then helps people, operators, to turn them off. Everyone doesn't want an that. So, between those two, I think that we can help monitor the carbon above ground in the trees, the carbon emissions from every point on the land over the earth, and hopefully blue carbon and brown carbon, the soil carbon in time to have a quantified metric for every place on the planet.
And the final layer of applications actually in academia, where a lot of people use our data to track system sciences across all the different kinds, atmospheric science, cryosphere, glaciology, all the different pieces, climate work. And most of that's funded by NASA that provides this data for free for all universities across the United States. There's a somewhat similar program with the European Space Agency you can apply for if you're interested, but Oxford has a program so you can have access to all of our data, too.
I want to talk about AI mostly for the rest of the discussions because AI and space are getting married. We were doing a fair bit of work with CNNs, the old school way of tracking objects, but now we're doing a fair bit of work with LLMs, and it's fantastic what they can do. A lot of this based on the fact that we have 3,000 layers of images, so 3,000 layers of images for every point in the land mass of the earth on average, tracking changes over time. Obviously, AI's only as good as the data it's trained on. And the AI algorithms today are primarily trained on the text of the internet. And they're incredibly fluid about understanding a lot of different pieces of human knowledge that's captured in that text on the internet, but they didn't know much about the real world.
So, if a farmer asks, 'How is the crop yield doing in their field?' it can't tell them very much about it. It can tell them about the theory of agronomy, but it doesn't know anything about their field today. So, this is some of the work in CNNs. So, this is like, 'Can you see the ships and the planes?' The AI is very good at pulling that out.
And in 2018, I did a TED Talk called Queryable Earth, where I was basically postulating that if we could see every ship, every train, every road, every building around the whole world every day, then we could index everything on the earth. So, a bit like Google indexed the internet to make it searchable, we're trying to index the earth to make it searchable. 2018, fast forward, LLMs have made this goal way, way more tractable and faster. And so, I call the combination of Earth observation and LLMs planetary intelligence, because I think it's a new era of intelligence.
But a lot of people are talking, Dario from Anthropic and Demis from DeepMind and others are talking about building physical world models. And obviously for physical world models, you need real-world data. And I think what that enables you to get is sort of a planetary intelligence. Obviously, the natural place for planetary sensing is done in space. And soon we'll actually see some of the compute going to space as well. And I think this is a new era.
So again, LLMs know about floods, but they don't know about the flood in your town today and who needs help to rescue that. And that's what we're trying to change. So I want to actually show you this little application we're building, which actually merges LLMs with our data. It's in private beta now, so it's an early test app. But I'm pleased to show a little bit about what it does. So basically, it enables you to search the Earth. It would do text queries in natural language. It can search the whole planet in about a second for any object that you either find and say, 'Find me more like this.' Or ask questions about.
You can also just give it like, 'Find me blue ships in lakes near bridges.' And it will go and find those things in the whole world. It will write descriptions about it. Come up with before and after certain events. Do analysis. And we've just added this new deep research mode, so you can have it go off, do analysis over larger areas that are more systematic. So it's kind of fun.
This is some little description. You can even write code. So it can build applications for you in there so that you could build a dashboard or build an application in time. So this is some analysis and if you go to the next slide, it can generate graphs and reports. If you go to the next slide, maybe I should just stop trying to click this thing. Yeah, push that video.
This is a real one that it did where we were asking about a flood plain and assessing the flood plain over time. It did all that assessment itself. And drawing on the world's knowledge that it has latent in the LLM together with the data that it can access from our daily scan for the last 10 years. And in this case it is spitting out all these anomalies, gives you quantified analysis. It may not be perfect, but anyone can have access to it. And that's the beauty of this system.
And I really hope that this will open up geospatial data to a lot of people. You know, it's basically the big organizations, the big ad companies, the big countries and so on that can get access to satellite data today. But I hope this application will start helping us to have a wider range of applications. And most importantly, to take care of course our precious planet and biodiversity on it. It's really useful for conservation. And I had a friend the other day who already found some encroachment on some parks in Africa using this.
And this is where I wanted to talk a tiny bit about where this might be going next. So click on that video again. So basically we're putting Jetson Orin platforms on our satellites so they can do processing at the edge. And the whole idea, this was the first example of this. We did this just a few weeks ago where the satellite took the picture of this airfield in this case in Australia in Alice Springs and automatically did plane detection within a minute and sent down just the answer to the question right there. So instead of having to wait a few hours for it to go over our ground stations, it can now do the processing at the edge and then satellite-to-satellite communication so that you get the answer back real time. Obviously in cases like that Lahaina fire or other disaster response, getting answers in minutes could be really, really helpful.
And so I said the natural place for sensing the planet is in space. Well, soon the natural place for putting compute is going to be in space, too. And this sounds super sci-fi, but is actually coming to us to be reality very, very quickly. So basically, we're working with Google on an early project moonshot, as they call it, called Suncatcher, which is flying their TPUs in space not for processing a sensor that's already there, but actually just to do compute in space for its own sake. Why? Because it's actually just going to be cheaper to put it in space in the next few years. With lowering launch costs, data centers are primarily an energy challenge, and you can get five times more power for each solar panel in space. You don't have to have your buildings, you don't have to encroach that land, you don't have to raise up the energy costs of the local community or use their water.
You actually just put it in space. So we did an analysis about eight or nine years ago with Google that showed that when launch costs come down to about two or three hundred dollars a kilogram, it actually is just cheaper to put it in space than on the ground. It also has, I think, sustainability advantages of not conflicting with a lot of stuff on the ground. This is not a picture of the real satellite. I can't show you one. So this is a silly mock-up. But what might that enable? So that's the next phase in planetary intelligence when we put the sensing system and the compute systems together in space enabling us to have real-time understanding of everything that goes on in the planet.
And you know, just my hope is not just that this data helps us make smarter decisions day-to-day, but hopefully it will help us to level up and become more wise as a species as the de facto stewards of this planet. And so maybe I'll just wrap with a just a bit of a speculation.
I recently wrote a little article on planetary intelligence and I raised the specter of whether as we give AI, which is largely this disembodied brain in a vat right now, access to sensing data, will it therefore not just by understanding the world, will it come to value the world more, the physical, all the beautiful biodiversity on the planet? And, you know, I've recently got into birding because my partner's into birding and she's obsessed with it, so I go around. And the more I understand birds, the more I value them. You know, it's not just a bird over there, or it's these kinds, and I know there's tweets and stuff.
And so if the AI understands all the river deltas and the forests and the beautiful ecosystems of the earth, will it inherently value them more? I hope so. This is not, I think, a way out of the alignment problem, but I think it's an important component potentially of us aligning AI. Because the biggest threat we have to ourselves now, we just sort of muddled through the nuclear age, is going to be how we take care of giving birth to superintelligence in a way that continues to have the beautiful life that we have on spaceship Earth. And it's a tantalizing prospect that, you know, life is rare in the universe and there is a worry that one of the reasons, one of the genuine answers to the Fermi paradox, is that life gets to this sort of stage of technology and then blows itself up.
And so how we steward AI in particular is so important. And maybe, just maybe, if we give it more understanding of nature and biodiversity, maybe it will care about it. And I just do one final speculation. Here's me back when I was a student here with my supervisors. And this is Roger Penrose who I just caught up with 2 days ago. He's 94 now. And he has some, apart from his great work that he got the Nobel Prize in for physics for in black holes, he did some more speculative ideas about consciousness.
And I think that LLMs and those AI systems that we use today are going to have a hard time becoming conscious without sensory input. So, just like a baby is unlikely to become learn and become intelligent and become conscious without sensory input, how are LLMs going to become conscious without that? And he thinks they're never going to become conscious. I disagree with that. He thinks Turing machines can't do it, but I am a functionalist and I think that it is very likely that as it gets smarter, it will become conscious. And to all intents and purposes, if we are conscious, it's conscious. And so, anyway, as we, so, a further speculation is if it is not going to become conscious, it's not going to value, it's not going to value humans unless it becomes conscious and it needs sensory data in order to do that. And I think that will behoove us to help it to do that. So, we're trying to do that. Very speculative.
But much more practically, if you have any interest in playing with this app, it's in private beta. And you can literally just log on now and we'll give you access, and all we ask is that if you're interested, just play with applications and see what real-world value it gives you and tell us a little bit about that. Because I hope that if we spread this geospatial technology out to more people, we can have more impact and help us to take care of spaceship Earth. So with that, I'm done. Thanks very much, everyone.
So far, yes. They only get words. Yeah.
Yeah.
For sure. That, I mean, that's the whole point of what we're talking about here. Yeah, and I like to talk about the evolution to large Earth models instead of large language models, and that's the integration of physical world data. Obviously, satellite data is a core, not the only thing. If you think about LLMs, obviously they scrape most of the internet. They take in Common Crawl, which has taken Wikipedia and Reddit data feeds and all the rest of it and put that into their model. Your photos of cats and dogs online. But the most core thing I would say is there was a crux data set for those LLMs, it's probably something like Wikipedia, right? That's probably a lot of its valued data set.
What's the equivalent for real-world models? I would like to say, and I'm extraordinarily biased, but I like to say it's satellite data. What's the thing that has already basically the whole world monitored on a regular basis? The only thing that can do that systematically and comprehensively is satellite data. Now, there's lots of other things, IoT, soil samples, sampling, what have you, people's phones with various other things. They're going to be supplementary to a core corpus that can upgrade us from large language models to large Earth models. And I think that has a lot of implications like we've discussed.
In earth observation or in space journey?
I mean, I think we're going to continue to improve the data sets more. You know, there's three main axes you can improve: resolution, temporal resolution, and spatial and spectral resolution. And we're improving all three and many others are as well. So, our Pelican spacecraft is taking our 50 centimeter high res system and going to 30 centimeters as well. The hyperspectral imager is 400 bands and we're trying to improve that. And then the latency we're trying to improve as well.
Our next scan system is going to go from a 3-meter resolution system to 1-meter daily scan of the whole planet. And also come down much faster within half an hour rather than a few hours as it presently is. So, it's about a 10x improvement in the amount of data collected and a 10x improvement in the latency. So, we're going to collect better and better data, but I think the big unlock is frankly all the AI. You know, most of the value of our present earth imaging data sets again not just Planet, but all of them, the earth observation systems like Sentinel, like NASA's Landsat program, other commercial players, I would say less than 1% of the value is getting to the people that need it today. So, that's a tragedy and
That's more unlocked by the AI systems and analytics that make it easier so you don't have to have a PhD in remote sensing to get some value out of this. And that's going to happen really quickly, because it doesn't require obviously launching new satellites and stuff and a lot of the tech is actually there finally now.
Audience Member 28:52 ↗
So, as a follow-up question about the different countries or companies launching different sets of satellites and how you view the kind of dynamic, is it kind of competition or collaborative among different entities trying to basically send more and more satellites into space.
Will Marshall 29:09 ↗
Geopolitics in space. Well, yeah, there's obviously plenty of competition and I think it's great. I mean as you see SpaceX is going public today. That's very exciting. The space field is very exciting right now. There's a lot of new entrants as well. Lots of new launch providers. I think my colleague counted 200 nano rocket providers that are building rockets. There's dozens of earth imaging companies, dozens of communication companies. There's startups doing computing in space like the thing I mentioned that we're doing with Google. And other things like that. It's a proliferation and a lot of it's unlocked by the lower launch costs and there's miniaturization of satellites as I said. I think a good analogy is the mainframe computer to desktop computer revolution in IT and all the unlocked applications that had. You know, we used to have computers the size of this room. Each country had a couple of them. As it proliferated the applications to make them smaller and we made satellites that were once not quite as big as this room but big as double-decker bus sort of size satellites and shrunk them down to this big so we can launch hundreds at a time and it's totally changing the number of applications that we've made for them because the cost is just radically lower. You know, about a thousand times lower. So, I think your competition is welcome. I think it's exciting. I think it will help us to take care of the planet more. You know, SpaceX is mainly space for Mars. Blue Origin which sadly blew their rocket up the other day is mainly space for the moon. We think of Planet as space for the Earth, which is the best planet of all.
They can have those ones.
Ben Caldecott 30:44 ↗
But just building quickly on that, that kind of geopolitics, geostrategic question. I mean, obviously, you know, you've been put under I assume lots of pressure from the US government in relation to imagery in the Middle East recently. And that's the example of state power shaping these capabilities. How's that going to develop, do you think?
Will Marshall 31:03 ↗
Yeah, I mean, it's obviously, you know, these systems are providing important information about what's going on the planet. Every time there's a conflict in the Middle East, it's not the first one that we had to deal with where there's often a tension between right now operations that are happening ensuring that people aren't going in harm's way versus the public interest. And those are in tension, so we normally put a delay in place of our imagery over a conflict area until things abate a little bit. Most of our core clients, like our country customers, are big like people like the American Red Cross, like I was saying, continue to have access to these things, but there's sensitivities about releasing it more widely. And it will always eventually go to anyone that wants to access it, but there's just reducing the surface area that can create operational challenges, and we've seen it, and so we've dealt with it in that sort of way. And I, you know, I think many countries think like that. It's not just the US. And so it's always a balance but we try to strike the right balance.
Ben Caldecott 32:14 ↗
And what would, you gave that really powerful example of Russia-Ukraine. And obviously, now the Russians know that you can do that. If there was another conflict, wouldn't the invading force kind of do something about that capability and degrade your capability?
Will Marshall 32:29 ↗
Well, in fact, in the start of the full-scale invasion of Ukraine by Russia, they did take out the Via satellite. And that's partly because it was only really
Ben Caldecott 32:41 ↗
Say more about what that is?
Will Marshall 32:42 ↗
That was a communication satellite operating over Europe from a geostationary orbit. They jammed it. But Starlink, because it was far more satellites, proved to be almost impossible to jam. So, these proliferated satellites are harder to do that with. So it would be hard, right? To do that. Yeah, so I think it's less likely, but of course it's a real thing that countries care about. My hope though is there's a different angle on that, which is the deterrence value, right? You know, hopefully countries before invading each other will know that it's all going to be out in the open, so everyone gets to see that. You know, when Putin said, 'I don't bomb schools and hospitals.' We showed on the front page of the New York Times the next day the five schools and hospitals that they bombed. That accountability, that transparency drives accountability. If, you know, hopefully they care about it. And I think, you know, in terms of the hearts and minds, everyone getting to know that really puts some pressure. So, you know, if you look back at history, most war has happened when people had misinformation or lack of information, and then they assume the worst or do miscalculations. We think it's much better for there to be more information about what's going on. Everyone knows where their respective assets are at. And they're less likely to have miscalculations. So, the hope, this obviously didn't apply to Mr. Putin. But the hope is that it acts as a deterrent value internationally. And that's part of the thesis of Planet. It's not just a secondary matter. Sustainability was the first purpose of Planet, but security was a very close second because we think that transparency drives accountability and that's a good thing for the world, especially for more open and democratic countries.
Ben Caldecott 34:46 ↗
Yeah. Yeah. Yaco at the front, these two at the front, David and Yaco.
Yaco 34:55 ↗
Thank you, Will. Fascinating story. Can't get enough of it. I just wanted to ask how you think about your own sustainability footprint, right? So, kind of with more and more rockets launching, etc., etc. But, like what is the scale of that? How do you measure that? Where do you see that going? What do you do about it?
Will Marshall 35:13 ↗
Great question. Yeah, well, we have a whole offset program. We monitor all of our carbon emissions. Funnily enough, it's not the rockets. It's the stupid executives like me traveling around the planet on planes that dominates it. So, we try and offset those flights and other things. Obviously, the deeper you get into the supply chain, at different levels, it's harder, but obviously as a net matter, we think we're having much more positive impact. I mean, if we reduce deforestation rates with the Brazilian federal police 60%, that obviously makes all of our emissions look pale in comparison. That doesn't mean we don't have a responsibility to do everything we can about our emissions, but I certainly think about it in that context.
Ben Caldecott 35:59 ↗
Dave? Uh David Oakenson, Bank of England.
David Oakenson 36:02 ↗
Thanks, Will. That's fascinating having listened to you over lunch and seeing more of it. I think you realize how much you can do, and I thought of a more specific question. Have you done any work tuning, validating flood models?
Will Marshall 36:18 ↗
Yeah. So, actually Google did a fair bit of work. I mean, most of the work that we do is with our partners, so just to be clear, like, you know, we didn't stop the deforestation in Brazil, the federal police did leveraging our tools, right? But in this case, in the case of floods, Google used a lot of our data to improve flood modeling so they could predict it more six or seven days in advance because according to some UN statistic, if you could get it that far out, then you can do much more in prevention and getting people out of harm's way. And so they managed to do that leverage and, you know, they're mainly looking in India and Bangladesh and other places where after the monsoon season, a lot of the flood plain changes, so you needed updated digital elevation models. So we worked with them on giving them data that underpin those updated digital elevation models. I'm not aware of anyone doing this on a global basis, but there's probably a lot of work in academia I'm not aware of.
David Oakenson 37:18 ↗
And how far back does the data record go from the satellites?
Will Marshall 37:21 ↗
So from our satellites, about 10 years. Daily scan has been going for about 10 years. Before that, there was and it still is Landsat, which actually goes back 50 years at a lower cadence, but roughly every 16 days and at lower resolution, roughly every 30 meters, so 10 times poorer resolution and 16 times poorer temporal resolution, but an incredible archive of change over time. I would say, you know, our goal was to just make it a little bit more actionable. Landsat is really great for the science and Sentinel-2, but we wanted to make it more about the application to real-world phenomena. There, you want to get inside the human action, so deforestation is an example. Typical time scale of logging roads is a week. So you want your data faster time scale than a week, otherwise you're not going to spot it. And Landsat's just not quite fast enough to see and it's not quite high enough resolution nor is Sentinel to see the individual tree canopy which is necessary because a bunch of that happens at the individual tree level. Same in security, obviously. Finding 2 weeks later warning the Ukrainians of some encroaching Russian forces is not particularly helpful compared with now. And so time access really matters, obviously.
David Oakenson 38:38 ↗
Excellent. Now, I think there's something really powerful that could be done linking up with climate change. As we try and predict flood risk into the actual decades. And I think we face a lot of deep uncertainty with the climate models, but I think it'd be really powerful if we could have global reliable flood models to understand the sensitivity to potential climate change.
Ben Caldecott 38:56 ↗
But does that, is that a core climate variable?
David Oakenson 39:00 ↗
In terms of flood risk?
Ben Caldecott 39:01 ↗
Yeah.
David Oakenson 39:02 ↗
Yeah, particularly for the UK, but I think broadly across the world. There's a lot of uncertainty around the precipitation patterns. But we want to try and pull out what the sensitivity is on a very sort of detailed level around the world. And at the moment we have reasonably good information say around the UK. Much less so in other parts of the world, but I think even in the UK it's not really good enough.
Ben Caldecott 39:23 ↗
Yeah. So, we've got time for more questions. I mean, one thing whilst people are thinking about that, I mean, we have lots of scholars here at Oxford working on kind of climate litigation, environmental litigation, and liabilities. And so this is sort of a potential use case for that corpus of data, that library of information going back in time. So, in the Brazilian case, it could be, 'Oh, you thought you got away with illegal deforestation 4 years ago, and that's still within the statute of limitations, we can see that you did that, and we're going to hold you accountable.' So, it's another kind of hurdle, another lever.
Will Marshall 39:55 ↗
Yeah, we know our data's been used in courts of law in Brazil quite extensively. Because it often ends up in a court.
Ben Caldecott 40:01 ↗
And but are you getting kind of more demand for that historical information?
Will Marshall 40:05 ↗
Yeah, actually much more with time, in fact. And also in the security realm where people want to understand not just if there's something new, but is it new compared with what's the history? So that you know, if that new is significant.
Ben Caldecott 40:18 ↗
Yeah. Cool. Okay. There was a question to just go on to this side. So yeah. And then further up.
Yushan 40:28 ↗
Thank you, Will. I'm Yushan from the Sustainable Finance Group. I'm really interested in your presentation about the integration of the satellite image and the large language models. So my question is I'm really curious about up to what level the large language model can understand the satellite image. Let's take one example. Since the satellite can take images for the entire world every day, so ideally is it possible at the end of the day I just ask, just tell me what's anything new happening in this world? So I'm just curious about up to what level the large language model can understand the satellite image.
Will Marshall 41:06 ↗
That's a great question. So typically what the LLMs can do is do similar to what you can do, which is look at an image and visually describe it. However, it is also paired with all that knowledge of forestry, agriculture, you know, coral reefs or whatever else in its corpus. So it marries those three things together. In terms of global capability, yeah. We're increasingly... So it can still hallucinate, by the way, just like it can with everything else. And so sometimes you ask it a question like, 'How many ships are in this port?' It's not very good at counting, just like humans are not very good at counting until you actually sit and do the thing. And so it would guess the wrong number. We're trying to make it more accurate by tying it to what we call planetary variables, where we've already done the hard work of the scientifically accurate baseline. And all it's doing is calling some API that has access to that. So the more it has access to those sorts of things, the better it can do at that. The best tool that we've seen that has really emerged recently for this is really fascinating, is embedding models that convert text to pictures or pictures to text. Incredible work has happened there such that we basically turn each parcel of land into a vector space that represents what's going on there in a high-dimensional vector space that you can search. So we managed to do that so that we can put one layer of the whole earth into one spreadsheet or a BigQuery database that you can search and that's where you can search the whole earth in less than a second. That's kind of bananas capability and that you can do that just in one quick search. If we do that for all the layers, you can essentially do that through space and time and then the query itself can be arbitrary in scale. I mean you can ask the whole earth that question or you can ask it just in Thailand or wherever else you want to ask about. So the versatility is becoming extraordinary.

31 more exchanges in this transcript

Sign in free to read the rest of this interview. No card required.

Sign in to read the full transcript

Cite this transcript

APA, MLA, BibTeX
APA

Marshall, W. (2026, June 24). Planetary Intelligence, Lecture by Will Marshall [Interview transcript]. OxfordSmithSchool. CEOInterviews.AI. https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/1167904/

MLA

Will Marshall. "Planetary Intelligence, Lecture by Will Marshall." OxfordSmithSchool, 24 Jun. 2026. Transcript, CEOInterviews.AI, https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/1167904/.

BibTeX
@misc{marshall2026_1167904,
  author       = {Will Marshall},
  title        = {Planetary Intelligence, Lecture by Will Marshall},
  howpublished = {Interview transcript, OxfordSmithSchool. CEOInterviews.AI},
  year         = {2026},
  month        = {jun},
  url          = {https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/1167904/},
  note         = {Speaker-attributed transcript with timestamps}
}