CEOInterviews.AI
Start App
Adam Spice
Chief Financial Officer, Rocket Lab Corporation

Talking Rocket Lab's New Era with Sir Peter Beck and Adam Spice

📅 Jun 30, 2026 Dave G Investing 45 MIN 17722 VIEWS 91 SEGMENTS · 4 SPEAKERS
Interviewing Peter Beck and Adam Spice on Rocket Lab's historic acquisition of Iridium. #rocketlab #RKLB #iridium The Success by Keys of Moon |   / keysofmoon   Music promoted by https://www.chosic.com/free-music/all/ Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)

What Adam Spice said

Written from the verified transcript and checked against it. Every figure links to the moment it was said.

Adam Spice, CFO of Rocket Lab, discussed the company's acquisition of Iridium, emphasizing the strategic and financial fit. He said the deal doubles the company's size, makes it meaningfully cash flow positive with single-digit dilution, and is a masterstroke. Spice noted the timing was right due to valuations and competitive dynamics around spectrum, comparing it to the Virgin Orbit facility deal. He addressed the $3.6 billion bridge loan, stating the goal is a debt-free company, but they may consider debt if cash flow stabilizes. Spice said Rocket Lab remains a neutral supplier, not competing with Starlink, and highlighted Iridium's unique global L-band spectrum. He confirmed optical terminals could replace Ka-band inter-satellite links, and that the constellation is software-defined, allowing innovation without hardware changes. Spice said the acquisition accelerates the financial inflection point, with Neutron launch scheduled before year-end, and that Iridium's 500 VARs provide an established channel. He noted Iridium's team is mature and will integrate into Rocket Lab's culture.

Key takeaways

  1. The Iridium acquisition doubles Rocket Lab's size and makes it meaningfully cash flow positive with single-digit dilution.
  2. Rocket Lab's goal is a debt-free company, but debt may be considered if cash flow stability improves.
  3. Rocket Lab remains a neutral supplier and will not compete with Starlink, focusing on high-value niches with L-band spectrum.
  4. Future Iridium satellites will likely use optical terminals for inter-satellite links, replacing Ka-band.
  5. The Iridium constellation is software-defined, enabling innovation through reprogramming before hardware changes.

Numbers and commitments

FigureWhat it refers toTypeAt
$3.6 billion Bridge loan for Iridium acquisition commitment 12:08
3,300 Rocket Lab's current employee count metric 37:21
500 Iridium's VAR network size metric 24:47
90% R&D spend on Neutron metric 31:20

Chapters

  1. 0:00Iridium acquisition rationale
  2. 5:09Timing and valuation of the deal
  3. 6:57Growth opportunities for Iridium
  4. 10:05Deal price and spectrum value
  5. 12:55Debt and capital structure
  6. 15:09Competition with Starlink
  7. 31:20Neutron launch and financial inflection
  8. 35:16Future M&A and applications
  9. 36:04Integration and culture

Questions asked in this interview

9
  1. 3:53Has it been like the stars kind of aligning recently with so much dynamic things happening in the markets, or have they been in your mind for a long time?
  2. 6:57Well, I mean, it's like any Rocket Lab deal, right?
  3. 12:08And if so, where do you think is the most appropriate leverage targets that investors should expect once that kind of converts to permanent financing?
  4. 24:12So what's the addressable opportunity in precision agriculture and industrial logistics for the combined company and what competitive edge does vertical integration give you against Starlink, OneWeb and other terrestrial IoT players?
  5. 26:42And could that same architecture extend to comms network around the moon or Mars?
  6. 29:31In your book of ideas, do you think there's a lot of stuff that can be built off of the current constellation or is there a lot of stuff that would need to be launched into the future?
  7. 34:48More broadly, how should investors think about Rocket Lab's long-term strategy for its space-based communication business?
  8. 36:04Do you have any thoughts on that?
  9. 36:24And I think we, correct me if I'm wrong, Adam, were we like a thousand then maybe or more than that?
Interviewer 0:04 ↗
All right. So, welcome everyone. This is a very special interview today with Sir Peter Beck and Adam Spice of Rocket Lab. Sir Peter Beck, you put on a special jacket a few days ago and you seem to be having the same problem as me. It must be something with the washing machine that the clothes seem to shrink a little bit. But you have this jacket when you guys have done something important and that's what we're here to discuss. So what have you guys done this time?
Peter Beck 0:37 ↗
No. Thanks very much. I only own like five jackets or less, probably less than five jackets. So the blue one comes out when something's important. But as you pointed out, I'm sure it's gone through the wash. Totally sure, because it can't be physical for it to shrink in all directions that much. But anyway, yeah, so obviously we announced our intentions to acquire Iridium and I think you guys have known our aspirations for a long time and we've made it pretty clear. And I guess I'm keen to hear from you guys. Were you expecting Iridium or were you expecting something else? I mean, we don't raise capital for no reason. What were you guys thinking?
Analyst 1:31 ↗
Oh, I was personally not expecting Iridium. I have to admit, sometimes I feel like I have a sense of what's going on behind the scenes and yeah, I was dead wrong this time, but fun to be surprised.
I would say in retrospect, obvious choice in retrospect, but like...
Yeah, I was not expecting it either. I think a lot of us were hypothesizing Equitis or Equatus, however that's pronounced. And when your opener to the video, and I don't know if it was on purpose or not, and you said 'presenting the space application equitous'...
Peter Beck 2:07 ↗
It was not, it was an equation, but that's perfect. I love it. I think this is even better.
Analyst 2:12 ↗
Yeah, I mean, I don't know if you guys know, but on Rocket Lab Weekly, Scott, who actually unfortunately couldn't make it today, he actually called that you guys would acquire Mineric. And I think Iridium came up once on one Rocket Lab Week and everybody was like, 'Oh no, no, no, it's too big, it's not a distressed asset,' and it doesn't fit the mold. But somehow, in retrospect, it feels like a perfect acquisition.
Adam Spice 2:44 ↗
No, I was going to say from a fit perspective, I'm personally very happy that we were able to find a way to get into the applications market that was also incredibly, I'd say, investor-friendly. To be able to essentially double the size of the company immediately upon closing the deal, become meaningfully cash flow positive for essentially single-digit level dilution, to me is kind of a masterstroke. So yeah, to align on the very strategic element of getting into the applications and not making it financially punitive, I think those are two things that don't often come in concert, but it certainly did in this case. So, yeah, we're pretty happy about that part of it.
Peter Beck 3:23 ↗
Yeah, I mean, it's very much a Rocket Lab deal in that sense. We've known the guys over at Iridium for many, many years. Something that's less well known is when I closed the B round, Scott Smith, who was the late Scott Smith, who is the COO of Iridium, actually was on our board for probably about five years. So we've known those guys over there for a long time.
Interviewer 3:53 ↗
That kind of actually touches my first question. And personally, I know there's a lot you probably can't share, but I'd be fascinated to know any kind of backstory you can tell us. How long have you been interested in Iridium? Has it been like the stars kind of aligning recently with so much dynamic things happening in the markets, or have they been in your mind for a long time?
Peter Beck 4:16 ↗
Well, I think we've sort of always breadcrumbed that, obviously an application, but also that one expedient way to get into an application is acquisition. And then if you look across the field who is actionable and who has valuable spectrum, there's actually not that many. And for us, we've always got a bunch of things going on in the background and some of them are relatively small and some of them are big. So it was just the right timing and the right kind of deal that we wanted to do and everything sort of converged to make it happen.
Adam Spice 5:09 ↗
I would add to that a little bit. Like in many things in life, timing is everything, right? I think this was probably not a deal that could have been done a year ago just because of our relative valuations. And it's probably not a deal that can be done a year from now given the competitive dynamics around spectrum and kind of where all the various current deals are in their process with regards to spectrum elsewhere in the market. So I think it's just one of those things where the stars literally align for us and, what they say, I forget who said it first, where your definition of luck might be when opportunity meets preparedness. I think it's a good example where we were prepared and we were able to take advantage of the opportunity. I think very much like the Virgin Orbit facility deal in Long Beach where we got this amazing asset for pennies on the dollar because nobody else was really ready to pounce on it when it presented itself. So yeah, I think life, timing, and being ready for opportunities when they present themselves is super important and we feel good about where we were at.
Analyst 6:10 ↗
Yeah, couldn't agree more. It's like you make your own mark.
Yeah, for sure.
Interviewer 6:16 ↗
All right, congratulations guys again. So the next question is, Iridium that you bought is a mature company and they had amazing cash flow but relatively modest growth. And following the acquisition, do you see a meaningful opportunity to accelerate Iridium's revenue growth? Because we obviously understand that their margins are going to expand because they will have access to better and cheaper launch and better and cheaper satellites and everything. But so if you're accelerating their growth, where do you see that growth coming from?
Peter Beck 6:57 ↗
Well, I mean, it's like any Rocket Lab deal, right? We're not just going to sit on our hands and just leave it to do its thing. We very much Rocket Lab-ize it and put our magic in there. And part of that magic is scaling. So, those guys have built an incredible business and if you look at the history of Iridium, they are the original entrepreneurs in space and the space hustlers. And it's amazing and they're a super innovative team in there. And if you just look at what they've got coming down the chute right now, the acquisition of Aireon, the aviation business is a really important element and mission critical. I mean, on the top of my little helicopter dashboard, there's a little box with an Iridium logo in the middle. And every time I jump in the machine, I push that little button and I know that if I have a bad day and end up in the bushes or in the creek or wherever, somebody knows where to find me. So I'm a customer of the aviation product even today. And I think there's huge opportunities there. But the PNT stuff around GPS-denied areas is really truly unique. And I think if there's one thing that unfortunate conflicts have shown, the importance of GPS can't be understated. So having non-jammable, anti-jamming kind of solutions for GPS is extremely valuable. So those guys have made huge leaps and bounds and are probably ahead of the pack in all of that. So that's even before Rocket Lab gets a hold of the reins. And I think the one unique thing of having a self-launching service provider is the ability to try new stuff. And the marginal cost for us to throw up a satellite with a new piece of technology on board or anything is pretty low. Whereas if you're a traditional satellite provider, those barriers are pretty high to just sort of innovate and try really new stuff. So I think the intention here is not just to acquire this thing and sit on it. We're excited about it and we acquired it because we think there's tremendous growth opportunity.
Interviewer 9:31 ↗
Awesome. Thank you for that answer. Adam, you mentioned previously the Virgin Orbit deal and kind of buying distressed assets and that being kind of one of the strategies that has brought you a lot of success. I've had some investors kind of reach out and say, you know, Iridium looks like they're trading at a bit of a premium compared to their historical valuation and it's a little bit different perhaps than some other valuations. I'm wondering if you could address the price and maybe just how you landed on the dollar ranges of the deal and thinking behind that.
Adam Spice 10:05 ↗
Sure. Look, you're right. They have been trading at a relative premium to where they've been for the last, say, 12 months, but I think that's a function of the market recognizing the value in spectrum and the scarcity of it. I think when we saw what SpaceX did with the EchoStar spectrum and then of course what Amazon did for Globalstar, it definitely feels very much like a game of musical chairs and the value of spectrum is only going to go up. So I think the thing that's interesting too about this opportunity and where we see a lot of value is there's certainly discrete value in the spectrum, but there's also a lot of value, especially for a company at our stage, not just going out and spending billions of dollars on spectrum sitting on it while we develop the business plans, the channel, the technology, and get a position to get Neutron up to scale where we can launch significant amount of infrastructure. We really hit the ground running here in a very, very shareholder cash flow friendly way. And I think that's really what separates this asset from the others. And so if you want to try to balance things out, to me it seems like we got tremendous value from, now we have tailwinds, if you will, from the financial contributions of this business versus just picking up headwinds that we'd have to fight for the next three or four, five years as we put this strategic capability into play. So, no, I think there's lots of ways to look at it. We looked at it from every angle you can imagine and we came away overwhelmingly convinced that this was absolutely the best way to crack this nut. And I think once this deal closes, I think the shareholders are going to see a very different financially profiled company. I think to the earlier question about growth, that's a very, very good question because one thing that Rocket Lab is known for is delivering outsized growth. And our multiples and the way that people look at us is based on, we're a hyper-growth company and the last thing we want to do is materially dilute that. So make no mistake about it. Our focus is going to be on turning this into a growth engine. We think they've already got things in the irons in the fire that are going to enable that, but we'll add our secret sauce to it. And I have no doubt that this is going to be another growth factor for the company.
Interviewer 12:08 ↗
So, following onto that, and this one's for you, Adam, as well, taking on the 3.6 billion bridge loan is a departure from kind of Rocket Lab's historical lean net cash position that they've generally utilized to keep the balance sheet pretty clean. Now that you guys have a reoccurring revenue stream, an EBITDA-positive Iridium on the books when that deal closes, does this signal kind of a shift towards the dilution aspect that Rocket Lab's been utilizing, and actually now leaning towards favoring debt for future growth opportunities? And if so, where do you think is the most appropriate leverage targets that investors should expect once that kind of converts to permanent financing?
Adam Spice 12:55 ↗
That's a really good question. I think that Pete and I spent a lot of time kind of wringing our hands over this. I think when you take a pure textbook view of optimizing for cost of capital, having some amount of debt in your capital structure makes sense. But I think we both sleep a lot better at night without layering a lot of debt on our business. There's enough volatility and enough risk in running a rocket company and a space company that you don't need to necessarily add financial risk to the mix too. So look, our goal, whether it's in the short-term, intermediate, or long term, would be to have a debt-free company that's throwing off a lot of cash. And there are ways to get there. I think to the extent that we feel comfortable in the future that the equity is in the right place and that's the right way, right trade to make, to equitize some of the debt, then absolutely we'll consider doing that. But Pete and I are two of the larger shareholders of Rocket Lab and so we're very sensitive to dilution as well. And we do get some pushback and I'm sure you guys have seen some of the funny memes out there about, that I'm all about just diluting, diluting, diluting. I think the capital that we've raised, we've found ways to put to productive use. And the last thing that Pete and I want to do is be diluted. So we're very much aligned with shareholders in that. But to your point, there might be a point in time where when we're comfortable enough with the stability of the cash flow and the growth trajectory of the business that maintaining some debt in the mix is going to be appropriate. So I think it's just we'll evaluate our trajectory as we get closer to deal close and kind of see where all the pieces are lining up.
Interviewer 14:28 ↗
No, I appreciate that color. It's very clear. Thank you so much. All right. So the next question is, some investors when they see this acquisition they immediately wonder whether Rocket Lab is becoming a direct competitor to Starlink. And now that Rocket Lab owns its own L-band spectrum and constellation, does that put it in competition with the other constellation operators? Or are you still committed to being a neutral supplier to everyone building constellations? And how would you describe Rocket Lab's position relative to Starlink and the Amazon LEO project?
Peter Beck 15:09 ↗
Once again, great question. So firstly, our intention is always to be a supplier to other folks. So this doesn't change that in any way. We think there's great value there. And Neutron, you've heard me say it, it's like 50% for everybody else and 50% for us. And that's kind of how we like it. And the reason why that's that way is, the more launch opportunities the industry has, it's a self-feeding machine in the fact that the more spacecrafts are built, the more components we sell. So it's a good thing. So no, certainly we're not going to tuck up into a tortoise and just do our own stuff. It's a clear part of our strategy to be a supplier to the industry and help scale everybody else's growth as well. Now, with respect to the Starlink thing, we're very mindful about which areas we want to play in and which areas we don't. And I think the L-band spectrum in particular is very unique spectrum in an Iridium sense. It's global. So it's, to my understanding, the only global L-band spectrum there is that has landing rights everywhere in the world. Doesn't matter what part of the ocean you are in, what part of the sky you're in, or what part of the land you're on, you have connection and that's very important. The L-band also is like a high-penetrating RF signal. So in bad weather and harsh conditions it's always there, whereas the S-bands and some of the other internet-providing bands, they're not as robust in those environments. So I think Rocket Lab has always been really good at playing in the niches and really high-value niches and you can build a really large and successful business there. And I think that's one of the things that Iridium has also done extremely well, is capture really high value from the niches or the areas that they play. Now, and arguably there are some larger consumer opportunities with direct-to-device and things like that that now open up. But I don't think you're going to see Rocket Lab overnight become an internet provider. I think we see more strategic places to play in that sense.
Interviewer 17:52 ↗
Yeah. And I think that follows up really well with this question. So Rocket Lab generally is good and known for vertical integration and Iridium's model is really relying on the wholesale partners and having them kind of develop their own applications. So how do you reassure those partners that Rocket Lab's focus is either going to stay and focus on the core space infrastructure piece and then leaving the end customer hardware and relationships into their hands and hopefully being able to build on top of that?
Peter Beck 18:20 ↗
Yeah, absolutely. Look, it's a service that just cannot go away. People's lives, aviation movements, marine movements depend on it every day. So that's just kind of baseline table stakes. And then what other services we can provide to customers on top of that is just all upside and bonus. So if you're a customer of Iridium today, I think you're going to see nothing but improved service in the future.
Interviewer 18:51 ↗
No. Perfect. Mr. Glacis, if you wanna go ahead.
Analyst 19:00 ↗
Say that again.
Interviewer 19:02 ↗
Mr. Glacis, if you want to go ahead.
Analyst 19:04 ↗
Oh, sure. I think you have the next one though. Do you want me to skip around?
Interviewer 19:08 ↗
I think Pete answered in the last question.
Analyst 19:11 ↗
Okay, perfect. Thank you so much.
Peter Beck 19:13 ↗
You guys are so organized. You've got like each of you got questions and time slots and you guys are getting serious.
Interviewer 19:19 ↗
We've tried to keep it organized. We took a poll from our viewers on X and in different places and we had such great feedback and so many great questions. I definitely think that the level of information and knowledge that the average retail investor has about Rocket Lab is so much more than it was years ago. So yeah, lots of great questions and we wanted to do that justice and kind of compile everything together and keep it to sync because you have a launch coming up.
Peter Beck 19:45 ↗
So here we go. Just promise me you're not gonna have to make me put on a suit or a jacket for these ones. Let's always just keep it in t-shirts.
Interviewer 19:55 ↗
I love it. I love it.
Analyst 19:56 ↗
I like it.
Interviewer 19:57 ↗
All right. So, Iridium brings a lot of assets to the table. In broad strokes, how do you see those pieces fitting into Rocket Lab's overall strategy, specifically the use of L-band?
Peter Beck 20:09 ↗
Yeah. So, one of the nice things about the constellation is it's very fresh. So there's a lot of time still within the constellation before it even needs refreshed, but also the way that they've architected it is it's all software defined. So they can do a lot of stuff. Now, there is a point in time of course that the constellation will need to be refreshed and at that point in time then obviously you realize the full power of a self-licking ice cream, if you will, with respect to the ability to build satellites and launch them. But I'd say it's also early days yet as to, we've got a book of ideas. Iridium's got a book of ideas and which opportunities we pursue and what particular infrastructure is required to pursue them to most utilize the spectrum. I think we're a little bit premature to be starting to talk too much about that.
Interviewer 21:11 ↗
All right. It would be great to be able to take a peek at that book. My god, I can only imagine. The next question is kind of along those lines. We had an audience member who really wanted to dive in a little bit closer and consider whether or not you're considering to build a meaningful physical AI robotics drone vertical now that Rocket Lab will own Iridium's proprietary network, an industrial IoT backbone with beyond visual line of sight and command and control capability. What are the chances of Rocket Lab expanding into those realms?
Peter Beck 21:47 ↗
It's not one I've thought of to be honest. That's a very specific application. But look, I think the point is valid that with the spectrum and the capabilities and the resources, there's endless things you can do. But you guys have always seen that we're very strategic about the things that we do and we never kind of go out on a land of hopes and dreams. We're always very buttoned up about the things that we think are going to be valuable and or proven. But yeah, look, the point's made that there's tremendous amount of opportunities in a whole bunch of different verticals that are now opened up and that really just, I think we said it in the investor presentation, but a massive new TAM has just been opened up and that TAM has tremendous...
Interviewer 22:41 ↗
Number of verticals also horizontals. Yeah.
Adam Spice 22:44 ↗
Yeah, I think it's fair. You know, in our discussions with the management team at Iridium, there are a lot of things that they had thought about doing, applications that they had thought about getting into. They got a lot of good ideas, but often cases the business case wouldn't close because of the cost of launch, you know, the cost of building the spacecraft. And I think that whole dynamic has changed now because they've got access to a very vertically integrated company, you know, not the least of which is getting prioritized launch. Pete mentioned earlier as well, you know, our cost to put up R&D test beds is super low, right? If you look at the variable cost of launching an Electron and putting a hosted payload, you know, on a Photon bus is like very very low. So, I think you're going to see a lot of ideas start to percolate up through the organization. And Pete has already put the challenge out to, you know, to the team well before this deal was announced of like, hey, bring me your out-of-the-box breakthrough ideas and we're incentivizing people to do that. So ideas like you just mentioned, there could very well be things that come up through that process. So yeah, we're absolutely encouraging kind of outside-of-the-box thinking. We've already seen some of that from the Iridium team. So I think you'll see us go in some very interesting unpredictable areas as a result of owning this capability.
Interviewer 23:52 ↗
That's perfect. Exciting times definitely.
Peter Beck 23:56 ↗
Yeah. As Adam said, we run like a CEO venture capital fund. So anybody in the company can come and pitch an idea and if it's good enough then we fund it just like a VC.
Analyst 24:10 ↗
Interesting.
Interviewer 24:12 ↗
All right. I also have a question from a subscriber that is similar to the one here but I promised I will ask the question. So what's the addressable opportunity in precision agriculture and industrial logistics for the combined company and what competitive edge does vertical integration give you against Starlink, OneWeb and other terrestrial IoT players? And believe it or not we have a lot of ranchers who follow Rocket Lab. So this is yeah an interesting question.
Adam Spice 24:47 ↗
Yeah, yeah, yeah, no, it is an interesting question. I mean, I couldn't have a number off the top of my head, but needless to say that, you know, Iridium is, you know, highly embedded into a lot of those applications already. And, you know, as we've talked about in the past, I think a lot of those applications are likely to be improved with the continued rollout and improvement and innovation that we're able to bring to the asset. So, you know, I unfortunately I can't really respond exactly to that question with sensible figures or if I was to respond, I think it would probably be wrong. But all I'd say is I think that the probability of those services and those verticals improving is greatly, greatly possible. Yeah, I would add to that. I don't know if you recall, Pete, but maybe five years ago when we were first talking about, hey, you know, what are some of the more interesting applications in space, we actually spent some time looking at those agricultural verticals. And the one thing that we took away with is it can be a very interesting business but the channel is incredibly challenging to establish, right? It's, you know, it's kind of farmer by farmer, you know, kind of mountainside by mountainside type of go-to-market strategy. And the one thing you get with Iridium is a very, very established channel that would take many, many years to build otherwise. You're talking about, I think, a network of like up to 500 VARs, right? So I think, you know, once we really kind of get in under the hood and start the integration planning and the longer-term business strategy mapping, I think we could find opportunities like that where we can leverage that extensive channel for things just like you mentioned, to the extent that they haven't looked into that already. But yeah, no, that's a market ironically that we looked at probably five years ago and now who knows, maybe this deal brings that back full circle.

44 more exchanges in this transcript

Sign in free to read the rest of this interview. No card required.

Sign in to read the full transcript

Cite this transcript

APA, MLA, BibTeX
APA

Spice, A. (2026, June 30). Talking Rocket Lab's New Era with Sir Peter Beck and Adam Spice [Interview transcript]. Dave G Investing. CEOInterviews.AI. https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/1170151/

MLA

Adam Spice. "Talking Rocket Lab's New Era with Sir Peter Beck and Adam Spice." Dave G Investing, 30 Jun. 2026. Transcript, CEOInterviews.AI, https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/1170151/.

BibTeX
@misc{spice2026_1170151,
  author       = {Adam Spice},
  title        = {Talking Rocket Lab's New Era with Sir Peter Beck and Adam Spice},
  howpublished = {Interview transcript, Dave G Investing. CEOInterviews.AI},
  year         = {2026},
  month        = {jun},
  url          = {https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/1170151/},
  note         = {Speaker-attributed transcript with timestamps}
}