CEOInterviews.AI
Start App
Emil Michael
Under Secretary of War for Research and Engineering, US Department of War

Defense Undersecretary Emil Michael: Anthropic’s Claude would ‘pollute’ defense supply chain

📅 Mar 12, 2026 CNBC Television 8 MIN 21111 VIEWS 12 SEGMENTS · 2 SPEAKERS
Emil Michael, Department of Defense Undersecretary of Research and Engineering, joins 'Squawk Box' to discuss Anthropic's battle with the Pentagon, details of OpenAI's contract with the Department of Defense, Anthropic's supply chain risk designation, and more.

Questions asked in this interview

5
  1. 0:36And you said at the time that that was your "whoa" moment. What happened?
  2. 2:23Did Palantir answer the question that was asked: was their software used?
  3. 3:20... used for spying in mass levels on Americans, whether it was legal or not; and second of all, they didn't want decisions being made without a human involved when it came to destruction and weapons that could kill people. Is that the case?
  4. 5:32Why did you strike a deal with OpenAI and not Anthropic?
  5. 7:01What do you say to that argument?
Becky Quick 0:09 ↗
Welcome back, everybody. Our next guest is at the epicenter of the Pentagon's feud with Anthropic. Joining us right now is Emil Michael. He is Department of Defense Undersecretary of Research and Engineering, and he heads up the Pentagon's adoption of AI. He also led discussions with Anthropic and its CEO, Dario Amodei, on the use of the company's AI models. And first of all, Undersecretary Michael, thank you for being with us today.
Emil Michael 0:34 ↗
Good to see you, Becky.
Becky Quick 0:36 ↗
Good to see you, too. Let's walk back and try and figure out what happened. We've spent an awful lot of time talking about the government's battle with Anthropic and kind of the fallout from it. But if I understand correctly, I think what first happened was a "holy cow" moment—I'll say that you had—I think you called it something slightly different, but a moment after the Venezuelan raids that captured Maduro, where Anthropic went and asked Palantir if its software had been used in those attacks. And you said at the time that that was your "whoa" moment. What happened?
Emil Michael 1:14 ↗
Yeah. What happened is we were in the middle of negotiations with all the frontier lab companies to more widely deploy their models across the department for all the various use cases: enterprise intelligence, warfighting. And then after the Maduro raid, one of the senior executives from Anthropic had called Palantir, who is the prime contractor, and Anthropic, a subcontractor in a contract with the Department of War, and asked if their software was used, which is classified information, and implying that if they didn't like the way it was used in that raid, that we might have a problem and have violated the terms of the contract, which meant that they could shut us off at any time, which was the "whoa" moment. Because then we realized we are dependent on this one provider who wants to insert their policy preferences in the middle of an operation, potentially, and harm the warfighter. And that was something that we took extremely seriously at the time.
Becky Quick 2:23 ↗
Did Palantir answer the question that was asked: was their software used?
Emil Michael 2:30 ↗
I can't say. It's not okay for me to say here. Yeah, still classified. But the mere asking of the question, and then the mere relaying of that question to other executives at the company who have since commented that they were asking different kinds of questions and they didn't have clearances, really posed a big problem. But really the substance of problems there was that they were worried about their software being used in a raid. And remember, they've sold their product into what's called a combatant command that engages in combat, and their terms of service, trying to restrict how that combat is conducted. And that means they're inserting themselves in the chain of command. And that was very worrisome to us at the Pentagon.

6 more exchanges in this transcript

Sign in free to read the rest of this interview. No card required.

Sign in to read the full transcript

Cite this transcript

APA, MLA, BibTeX
APA

Michael, E. (2026, March 12). Defense Undersecretary Emil Michael: Anthropic’s Claude would ‘pollute’ defense supply chain [Interview transcript]. CNBC Television. CEOInterviews.AI. https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/1335903/

MLA

Emil Michael. "Defense Undersecretary Emil Michael: Anthropic’s Claude would ‘pollute’ defense supply chain." CNBC Television, 12 Mar. 2026. Transcript, CEOInterviews.AI, https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/1335903/.

BibTeX
@misc{michael2026_1335903,
  author       = {Emil Michael},
  title        = {Defense Undersecretary Emil Michael: Anthropic’s Claude would ‘pollute’ defense supply chain},
  howpublished = {Interview transcript, CNBC Television. CEOInterviews.AI},
  year         = {2026},
  month        = {mar},
  url          = {https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/1335903/},
  note         = {Speaker-attributed transcript with timestamps}
}