David Schmaier26:17
Sure. Well, the proof's kind of in the pudding. And so when we launched Agentforce, we turned it on in their sandbox, not in production, because we don't think our customers would want that. But you could show up to an AI campground and log in, and we had a team of experts, and we turned on over 10,000 companies, I think it was 10,600 in three days at Dreamforce in San Francisco, which I believe is the largest onboarding of AI agents in human history. It really is mind-blowing. And then in our fourth quarter, we added another over 5,000 brand new Agentforce customers. And so the magic of Agentforce is it's built on the platform we've been building for the last 25 years. And so many people, when ChatGPT came out, said, 'Oh, what's the big deal? I'm just going to take ChatGPT and plug it into Salesforce or whatever other software I'm using.' But that's not really the answer. Our view is the LLM, the foundation model, is like the chip in the computer. That's like saying the microchip is going to automate all your work. Well, you couldn't have a personal computer without a microprocessor, but you need an operating system and you need a storage device and you need a whole set of hardware and software components so that you can use the computer to do really cool things. We think the same thing is true with LLMs. LLMs are becoming a commodity. There's kind of a leaderboard of this one's 94% accurate, this one's 95%. So what we've done is built an AI and data platform where you plug in the LLM of your choice, and it dramatically outperforms the LLMs by themselves in terms of accuracy, in terms of hallucination rates. It understands the context of what you're trying to do, which is clearly important, and it accesses not only the data but what we call the metadata and the semantics that we have, what's called the semantic layer, which is the fundamental meaning of what a user is trying to do, and it describes the information in the database and in the objects. And so there's a real reason why it outperforms an LLM by itself. It includes an LLM but it does a lot more than an LLM does. And that's how you can deliver what we call agentic reasoning. So we're talking right now and there's neurons in our brain and I'm listening to you and you're listening to me and we're sort of processing that data and understanding what the semantic meaning is of what we're talking about. And then we have a planning engine in our brain that sort of comes up with a plan of what you're going to say or what you're going to do or how you're going to motion with your hands and your expressions. Well, the AI can do the same thing now too. So we built something called the Atlas reasoning engine that reasons just like you and I do. And that's a sort of a higher level function for AI. It's not just I ask it a question and it gives me an answer. And so we think that's really where this all goes: AI in the flow of work is where it started, and then it goes to AI agents. And we think once you have AI agents that can reason, then it's very similar to the Waymo example. You're going to take the AI agents and plug them into physical devices: cars, industrial robots, robots in the home, set-top boxes in your house. And the AI is going to do, it's going to be like right out of the Avengers movie with Jarvis. It's going to do incredibly cool things. You're going to talk to it and it's going to make all of our lives better, we believe. And will there be misuses of it or problems along the way? Of course there will be. That was true with the internet, that was true with e-commerce, that was true with every prior technology boom. It can be used for good or bad. But that's why we have a judicial system and a government that make sure that people don't rob a bank using AI, just like they did for cyber terrorism. And so I think it's going to really change our lives in a good way and make things easier, to allow people to focus on higher level functions. And in the product domain, as you asked, it goes back to the mechanics of building product versus the artistry. The agents will be able to do a lot of the mundane work that's time consuming and needs to be done in a tedious but comprehensive way, where you're checking off the boxes, so that people can sit back and say, 'Hey, what is the software really doing?' And I can talk to people and say, 'Do they really like the software or do they love the software? And if they don't love the software, what would it take so that you would love the software?' And those customer communications that are person to person, I think, are super important.