Douglas Kehring4:51
Having done that many transactions, I think it boils down to four simple criteria. They're really easy, but it took us a long time. The first is strategic fit. You have to find companies that don't fit together, because you can't create value by having acquired them. You can't get unusual synergies in which you can return the value to your shareholders and to your customers. So at Oracle we've always prided ourselves on ensuring that we actually find the right companies that fit the best with our business. And when that's not the case, we don't make the acquisition. In fact, we walk away. I think that's held us in good grace, mainly because if you look at us as a company from a divestiture standpoint, we've made no significant divestitures to date, which means everything that we put together under one roof has been strategic. Then the second criteria is to pay the right prices. You know, it's really easy to use your checkbook and write a runaway value for a company because you think it's strategic. In the cycle of making software acquisitions, where we bought very marquee assets at two, three, four times' revenue. Today, companies are trading at 30, 30 to 40 times' revenue. So Oracle's been very disciplined about looking at acquisitions and ensuring that when we find a strategic asset, that we only proceed when we can find the right price, in which case we can generate a shareholder return, so they can be around for our customers for the long haul. I think the third criteria is to integrate effectively. So be the best integrator possible, which means that you've gotta think about how you bring these assets into your fold, so that the companies that don't do any integration, but even more importantly, the employees and the customers don't see it as an integrated company. They don't get a lot of value from standalone assets. At Oracle, we try to use our systems and integrate the companies very, very quickly, so that when we're done, after three or six months of the integration process, there's but one company again. We have one HR group. We have one IT organization. We have one finance group. And so everybody's under the same system, and rolling together toward the, to help customers be more effective. And then the fourth criteria for success is to repeat, and by that I mean you really have to be in the acquisition business, or not. It doesn't make any sense for you to do one acquisition every now and then, because you won't build up the knowledge base across every function, to helping integrate these acquisitions quickly and effectively. And they learn each time, that after every deal we can sit back and look at the transaction and understand, what did we do right? What did we do wrong? And in the cases of, where we might have done something wrong, we figure out how to do it more effectively or better the next time around. And that means that we can outcompete for these assets compared to our peers, because we know how to do this so well.