CEOInterviews.AI
Start App
Mark Carney
Prime Minister, Canada

MARK CARNEY TAKES a HISTORIC STAND against TRUMP — FULL SPEECH and PRESS Q&A

📅 Aug 22, 2026 Diario AS 51 MIN 101374 VIEWS 111 SEGMENTS · 8 SPEAKERS
HISTORIC FULL EVENT: Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney delivers a major speech explaining why Canada has walked away from tariff negotiations with the United States, followed by a full Q&A with the press. Carney delivers a remarkably calm but forceful message, arguing that Canada cannot accept the terms offered by the United States and will not give Washington what it has demanded. Without directly naming Donald Trump in his central remarks, Carney makes clear that Canada believes the relationship with its largest trading partner has fundamentally changed. He says the gap between a long-t...

What Mark Carney said

Written from the verified transcript and checked against it. Every figure links to the moment it was said.

Mark Carney announced Canada is suspending trade negotiations with the United States and will match Washington's new tariffs dollar for dollar, effective the Tuesday after Labour Day. He cited last-minute US demands that were 'uneconomic, unfair, and undermined the net benefits for Canada,' including restrictions on auto content and heavy-duty trucks, limits on Canada's ability to sign other trade deals, and efforts to restrict cultural and language protections. Carney detailed Canada's counter-tariffs on steel, dairy, appliances, agricultural equipment, pulp and paper, and electronics, and promised $25 billion to support affected workers and businesses. He emphasized Canada's diversification efforts, including 20 new trade deals, $500 billion in infrastructure projects, and the Gull Island clean energy project. Carney rejected exclusive access to critical minerals and dismissed the idea that US political calculations influenced his decision.

Key takeaways

  1. Canada suspended trade negotiations with the US and will impose matching tariffs on steel, dairy, appliances, agricultural equipment, pulp and paper, and electronics, effective the Tuesday after Labour Day.
  2. Carney said the US demanded restrictions on Canadian auto content, excluding heavy-duty trucks like Ford F-350s and GM Silverados, which made production uneconomic.
  3. Canada will provide $25 billion to support workers and businesses hurt by US tariffs, with details to be released early next week.
  4. Carney said Canada has signed 20 trade deals in the past year, giving tariff-free access to 1.5 billion consumers, and aims to double that in six months.
  5. Carney rejected any US demand for exclusive access to Canadian critical minerals, saying 'We would never give exclusive access.'

Numbers and commitments

FigureWhat it refers toTypeAt
50% US tariffs on Canadian industries including hockey equipment, clothing, cement, and beer metric 7:46
$25 billion Government support for Canadian workers and businesses hurt by US tariffs commitment 20:10
$500 billion New private investment in 27 nation-building initiatives metric 13:31
1.5 billion Consumers with tariff-free access to Canadian goods via trade deals metric 16:28
47 days Time to complete trade deal with the United Arab Emirates metric 16:28
$1,890 Maximum Canada Groceries and Essential Benefits per family metric 20:45
12 million Canadians helped by the Canada Groceries and Essential Benefits metric 20:45
99% Share of US natural gas imports supplied by Canada metric 5:27
85% Share of US electricity imports supplied by Canada metric 5:27
60% Share of US crude oil imports supplied by Canada metric 5:27

Chapters

  1. 0:00Suspension of trade negotiations
  2. 4:24US tariffs and justifications
  3. 8:08Canada's negotiating objectives
  4. 10:46Breakdown of talks
  5. 11:51Retaliatory tariffs announced
  6. 13:31Building Canada strong at home
  7. 16:28Diversifying trade abroad
  8. 20:10Support for affected businesses
  9. 23:20Q&A on US demands
  10. 35:23Q&A on critical minerals and energy

Questions asked in this interview

12
  1. 26:06Was Howard Lutnick's involvement in the last days an impediment to getting a deal?
  2. 29:52What's your message to those people who are worried about becoming collateral damage?
  3. 32:13Did any pushback from the premiers play a factor in the decision to end talks with the US?
  4. 35:23Did they ask about critical minerals, given their importance, their requirement for it, and how did that play out and what happened at the last minute?
  5. 37:13Did they ask for exclusive access to our critical minerals?
  6. 37:18Did you make any asks or offers?
  7. 37:36If Donald Trump can't execute the art of the deal with friendly Canada, who can you do business with?
  8. 39:07Secondly, was part of your calculation around declining US bargaining power?
  9. 41:04Were they asking us to impose tariffs on other countries in conjunction with them?
  10. 43:16And if I could just as a second part, what were they asking on culture?
  11. 43:40What were they trying to get us to gain more control over our trade power?
  12. 45:19Is that going to change now? Are those on the table?
Mark Carney 0:12 ↗
Okay, good morning everyone. Bonjour. I'd like to take this opportunity to update Canadians on developments in our trade negotiations with the United States. I'm going to go through why we're walking away from a bad deal and what comes next.
We can't control the storm that blows in from Washington. We can, however, chart a new course by building Canada strong at home and diversifying our trading relationships abroad.
For over a year, Canada has worked intensively and in good faith with the United States to negotiate a new comprehensive trade deal. We've been pragmatic, patient, and persistent. We pursued every opportunity to reach an agreement that protects Canadian workers and their families, that strengthens our economy, and that respects Canadian sovereignty.
We've been under no illusions. We recognized from the start that America has changed. Early last year in this room, I observed that the decades-long process of steadily increasing integration between our economies was over. Our government understood before many that America would transform all of its commercial relationships, that it would put a series of tariffs on its closest allies and use economic integration as a weapon.
We recognized that sometimes its signature was written in pencil. We worked in that context to try to strike a fair deal on which Canadian businesses and workers could rely. Our goal has always been to get the best deal for Canadians, never a deal at any price or on any time frame.
Last month, when the United States announced another round of unjustified tariffs, I gave our negotiating team a new mandate to seek a fair deal negotiated in good faith, because I believe that people on the ground on both sides of our border want this relationship to work. The bonds between Canadians and Americans are long and they remain strong.
A mutually beneficial trade agreement is possible. One that respects our sovereignty. One that builds on our complementary strengths. One that lowers costs for families on both sides of the border. One that creates good jobs for our workers.
Canada has always worked towards these goals, even while America's attention and dedication to them have wavered. We've consistently proposed long-term partnerships while America has often pursued short-term transactions.
The gap between partnership and competitor unfortunately has remained too wide in recent days. So last evening, I instructed our negotiators to return to Ottawa. We cannot accept what they've offered and we will not give what they've asked.
Over the past year, the US has imposed a series of tariffs that violate its commitment under our agreement with them and Mexico, so-called KUSMA. The United States has continually changed the rationale for these actions. From fentanyl to taxes on US tech giants to certification of US aircraft to the sharing of tolls of a bridge that Canada built and paid for to our dairy policy to provincial decisions not to sell American alcohol during a trade war to a television advertisement that quoted Ronald Reagan to smoke from wildfires, while they threatened our communities.
Another prominent justification for US tariffs has been their claim that since the United States runs, quote, a trade deficit with Canada, we were ripping them off. Also a quote. But the US's narrow merchandise trade deficit only exists because the US buys so much of its energy from Canada.
Canada fuels American growth, supplying 99% of their natural gas imports, 85% of their electricity imports, 60% of their crude oil imports. I don't think they want us to stop sending any of that energy.
And if you look more broadly at the comprehensive US-Canada trade balance, which includes the many services from finance to entertainment that we buy from the United States, that shows a persistent American trade surplus.
Most fundamentally, trade is about building mutual strength, creating a relationship that benefits both countries. For example, Canada is the largest customer for US cars. In fact, we buy more American-built cars and trucks than the United Kingdom, Japan, and China combined. It's the same for American steel products. Canada is also the largest customer for 26 US states and a top three customer for 45 US states. Last year, Americans sold almost $600 billion in goods and services to Canadians. That's more than $1.6 billion every single day.
On the other hand, Canadian exports to the United States lower costs for American families. In contrast, tariffs are taxes, taxes which are ultimately paid by US consumers.
While the United States has imposed a seemingly endless stream of tariffs and threatened war, Canada has, by contrast, taken several steps in good faith to try to find compromise and secure a comprehensive deal in the best interests of both Canadians and Americans.
Last month, the US announced that effective August 19th, it would impose 50% tariffs on a series of industries ranging from hockey equipment to clothing, cement, and beer. The only advantage of this latest threat was that it was a catalyst for more intensive negotiations.
Our objectives in these latest talks have been to preserve tariff-free access to the US for the vast majority of Canadian businesses. Secondly, to provide greater stability to our trade relationship. Thirdly, to significantly reduce US tariffs on our key strategic industries so that Canadian businesses in these sectors would have the best access of any in the world. Fourth, protect our small and medium-sized businesses, including by removing the imminent threat of those new tariffs. And fifth, fundamentally, maintain Canada's flexibility, independence, and sovereignty so we can keep building the country Canadians want.
Canada has made offers to secure a fair, comprehensive deal that would be in the best interests of Canadians. We were willing to drop our remaining retaliatory tariffs on strategic sectors, particularly steel, aluminum, and autos, if the United States substantially lowered theirs to levels that made it economic for Canadian companies to export to the United States.
In exchange for a fair deal, we would encourage our provinces to return US alcohol to the shelves. And we would take administrative measures to protect supply management without changing the system itself, the US quotas, or the tariffs that would apply.
There were some things we wouldn't do. We were not prepared to compromise Canada's sovereignty or to undermine our key industries.
Now, in recent weeks, there had been important progress made towards a possible agreement, an agreement that would have reinforced Canada's position as having the best deal in the world with the United States, including by securing the best terms for each of our most important strategic sectors and by providing greater certainty about our future trading relationship.
And while we believed earlier this week that we were moving towards a mutually beneficial agreement, in recent days, the United States proposed new terms that were uneconomic, unfair, and undermined the net benefits for Canada and called into question the reliability of any deal.
In short, they asked too much and they offered too little. More fundamentally, the cumulative effect of US demands revealed the limits of their commitment to a true economic partnership.
As I said earlier, as a result, last evening, I suspended trade negotiations with the United States and directed our negotiators to return to Ottawa. I want to thank Minister LeBlanc and our chief negotiator, Janet Sherret, and their team. They've worked hard in good faith right up to the last minute to defend the interests of Canadians.
Now, Canada will match Washington's new tariffs dollar for dollar in order to protect Canadian workers, farmers, families, and businesses. Our response will be concentrated in sectors such as steel, dairy, appliances, agricultural equipment, pulp and paper, and electronics. It will also include products that are currently subject to unjustified Section 232 and 338 tariffs.
This is a focused response to protect and defend our industries and allow them to compete with US products in the Canadian market. In the coming days, we'll release details of these new tariff measures, which will come into force the Tuesday after Labour Day.
Let me be clear. We take this step reluctantly. Reluctantly because we recognize that some of these measures will raise costs and reduce choice for Canadians. Reluctantly because we recognize that some US companies and some US states are innocent bystanders in a dispute that they did not want. Reluctantly because this trade dispute is preventing Canada and America from doing so much good that we could do together.
But at the same time, we take this step confident that it is in the best interest of Canada and that by rejecting a bad deal, by standing up for Canada, by focusing on what we can control, we will build Canada strong for all.
Building at home and diversifying trade abroad is not our plan B. It has been our plan A from the start. Canada will continue to pursue this path to build Canada strong because it's right and because it's working. We're moving rapidly to build major infrastructure. We've already referred 27 nation-building initiatives to the new major projects office, new ports, mines, energy corridors from every region of the country that now represent $500 billion in new private investment. Projects that will help Canada build bigger, move faster, and trade more with the world.
Just last Monday in St. John's, the governments of Canada, Quebec, Newfoundland, and Labrador launched the single largest investment in Canada's history to build the largest clean energy project in North America ever, in Gull Island. It will produce enough clean electricity to power every single vehicle in Canada.
We're building our economy while taking charge of our security by investing half a trillion dollars into our defense, expanding our shipyards, growing our aerospace industry, increasing our cyber capabilities. And we're realizing Canada's full potential as an energy superpower in nuclear, LNG, renewables, and low-carbon oil and gas. These are the initiatives that are the future of our country.
Canada is now the best connected economy in the world. Over the last year, we have signed more than 20 trade and security deals across five continents. We completed our most recent deal with the United Arab Emirates in a record 47 days. Canadian businesses now enjoy tariff-free access to 1.5 billion consumers. Over the next 6 months, we'll double that number through new trade deals from ASEAN to India.
Canada is building such unparalleled market access because we're trusted, because we're reliable, and because we have what the world wants. That's why the world is coming to our door. In just three weeks, we'll host the first Canadian investment summit in Toronto. The summit is attracting the world's largest investors who collectively manage over $100 trillion in assets. When they get here, they'll find a Canadian economy that has never been more connected or more ambitious.
This fall in Budget 2026, we will go further to make Canada even more competitive and attractive for businesses and strategic investors to build, invest, and grow.
The new US tariffs are designed to hurt us and divide us. They're a miscalculation. They're a miscalculation because Canadians will always take care of each other. We know we're stronger together.
In the last year and a half, Canadians have met this moment with resolve, with purpose, with strength. In many ways, vacationing in national parks, buying Canadian products, choosing Canadian. Small acts of solidarity repeated millions of times that make a statement: we're masters of our destiny.
This government is matching that spirit with $25 billion to protect Canadian workers and businesses hurt by American tariffs. We're helping small and medium-sized businesses respond by investing in equipment, productivity, and supply chain resilience. And we're financing large companies to keep large employers operating and to retain their workers. We're helping those hardest-hit industries retool and pivot to those new international markets. And we are being our own best customer.
We have the right plan to build Canada strong. We're on track and it's working. At the same time, we recognize that some of the biggest payoffs of this plan, of this transformation, will take time. And that's why we're also focused on giving Canadians a boost today and a bridge to that better tomorrow. So, we've cut taxes on incomes, on housing, and on gas. We've introduced the Canada Groceries and Essential Benefits, up to $1,890 per family, helping 12 million Canadians get ahead.
We're stronger now than when the United States started this trade war. More unified, more determined, more ambitious. With the strongest fiscal position in the G7 and a resilient economy, Canada has all the resources we need to pivot and to prosper.
Growth is accelerating. We're projected to have the second fastest rate in the G7 this year and next. We are creating jobs in this economy at four times the rate of the United States. Our non-US exports are up sharply. They're on track to double over the next decade. Foreign direct investment in Canada is at its highest level in two decades. It's running at twice the rate of our nearest G7 competitor. Canada now ranks as the most attractive country in the world for infrastructure investment.
Last spring, I warned that America is trying to break us so they can own us. And I promise that that will never ever happen. We are keeping that promise. Canada is becoming stronger and less dependent on America. We are already giving ourselves more than they can take away. And we are just getting started.
As we observed earlier this week in St. John's, Canadians don't submit to the weather, we thrive in it. We don't wait to see which way the wind's blowing or surrender ourselves to the waves to be storm-tossed by events. We set our own course. We make our own weather.
Thank you very much and I look forward to your questions.
Moderator 23:14 ↗
Thank you, Prime Minister. We'll now take questions. First question, Mackenzie.
Mackenzie Gray 23:20 ↗
Hello, Prime Minister. Mackenzie Gray with Global News. I'm hoping you can tell us what the specific last-minute changes that the Americans proposed that made a deal untenable.
Mark Carney 23:27 ↗
Thank you. Thank you for the question. Look, I would say two things. One is there are some specifics and I'll give you some examples, but it was also a cumulative aspect, as I mentioned in my remarks, about the willingness in total to enter into a true economic partnership. But in terms of specifics, I'll give you three, and I know there's other questions.
First, with respect to the auto industry, both in terms of the level of the tariffs, the treatment of Canadian content, so Canadian parts, Canadian steel, Canadian content in vehicles, the scope of the tariffs. The Americans wanted to limit it to autos only, not include medium and heavy-duty trucks, which is a big change obviously. And with respect to Ford's new plant, for example, in Oakville, which is F-350s, 450s, 550s, they would have been excluded. GM Silverado, same thing, would have been excluded from that. No rationale just for exclusion.
So effectively moving into a series of terms that would have made the production more uneconomic over time. Okay. So that's a change, that restriction, that clarification, that precision was a change.
The US introduced in the last hours efforts to restrict our ability to have other trade deals. You heard me say a moment ago what we've accomplished in the last year: 20 new deals, economic and security partnerships, the prospect of doubling our market access because we believe in free trade. We're the partner of choice in many respects for countries around the world, and the Americans wanted to restrict that. They had language that they wanted to restrict. Unacceptable. And I'll give you a third.
Continual efforts, always resisted, as I said in my remarks, and always will be resisted, efforts to restrict our protections of our language, our culture, and in effect our sovereignty. So elements coming in, ramping up any of them individually but collectively put us in a position where what had been on a trajectory absent those elements for a fair deal, a good deal for Canadians, not perfect but a good deal, a deal we would not accept.
Mackenzie Gray 26:06 ↗
Follow up. Was Howard Lutnick's involvement in the last days an impediment to getting a deal?
Mark Carney 26:12 ↗
It's a question for the US administration. Ultimately, I'm responsible for the decisions of the Canadian government. We take it as a cabinet, but I certainly bear those responsibilities, and so the head of the US administration, the president, bears the responsibility for the decisions they take.
But I will say this, which is that the Canadian team is unified. The individuals you see here, their team members, our ambassador in Washington, my chief of staff, unified, talking together, the clerk of the privy council, everyone in the loop, everyone knows what our objectives are. Collective decision-making. As I say, ultimately I and the cabinet bear responsibility for those decisions. But unity, you cannot say that about the United States administration.
And as a consequence, last point, and I'll go to your colleagues because I think this is important. In these last few days, we were drilling down on specific issues where that might have papered over the differences in the administration if there were indeed differences. Ultimately, there's a decision maker at the top. And in drilling down on those, a number of those issues that I just referenced became very clear, and there was not a deal that we would sign. Thank you.
Moderator 27:37 ↗
Next question.
Next question. CP.
David Baxter 29:52 ↗
Good morning, Prime Minister. David Baxter with the Canadian Press. There's a lot of people watching this right now who are rightfully worried about losing their jobs, losing their businesses in this trade war. What's your message to those people who are worried about becoming collateral damage?
Mark Carney 30:06 ↗
Well, yeah, thank you, David. A couple of things. First, the people in these industries, particularly the industries that are being hit today by these 50% tariffs, many of them are small and medium-sized businesses. They're in a wide range of industries spread across the country, concentrated in Ontario, Quebec, British Columbia by and large, that's not exclusive, but it's that. And they have very much been top of mind. It's one of the reasons why we worked so hard and stretched so far to try to get a deal.
Now, but not a deal at any price, not a deal on any timetable. So a couple of messages for those people. The first is we're going to hit back. Okay, we're going to hit back and we are going to provide tariff protection where we can, where it's relevant for some of those industries. Steel products and others is in some cases an example of that. We're going to provide full tariff protection there to prevent American businesses coming and taking business. So that provides some, but more fundamentally we will provide support and we will do whatever it takes to support these businesses.
We'll be releasing details of this early next week alongside our tariff actions to support these businesses, and we will support these businesses for as long as it takes. In other words, beyond the life of this US administration. Okay. So there's various mechanisms that we've worked up. We'll give all the details in a few days. But think of working through our regional development agencies, also working through the Business Development Bank of Canada. And those will be the focal points for a limited number of easy-to-use but very effective programs that are going to help these businesses work through this period, pivot as necessary, because part of what we're seeing is what the potential future limits are to the American market.
Moderator 32:11 ↗
Follow up. Next question.
David Baxter 32:13 ↗
And in the last couple of days, we heard some pushback from some of the premiers, such as Wab Kinew. Susan Holt said she was reluctant to put liquor back on the shelves. Quebec's Christine Fournier was saying she hadn't made up her mind on what Quebec's response was going to be yet. And Doug Ford was uncharacteristically silent, but he did send you a letter outlining his red lines last Monday. Did any pushback from the premiers play a factor in the decision to end talks with the US?
Mark Carney 32:41 ↗
Thanks for the question. First, let me say a couple of things. I mean, the short answer is no. So just to give you that perspective. But, and this is an important but, the dialogue with the premiers in the last few days, over the course of the last 18 months, and the partnership that we've established with the premiers is fundamentally important. It was the essence of our first ministers' discussion two days ago. We're going to have another one this afternoon.
But the essence of our first ministers' discussion two days ago was that it's our judgment, as we told Canadians, that we were on a path to a potential deal that would give Canada not just the best deal overall, but the best deal in all of our strategic sectors. That the price for that deal, in our judgment, was worth paying. We still had to come back to the premiers with the exact specifics. So it's entirely reasonable for Premier Ford or a premier to say, well, I want to see everything before I make that determination. But that our judgment was going to be that it was going to be worth taking a couple of steps that provinces needed to do in order to get the overall deal.
I'll go back to Mr. Baxter's question, not least because of the potential impact that we will now be fighting against on these small and medium-sized businesses here. Okay. So that was the discussion. I would, as chair of that meeting, there was a consensus that that's what we would do, subject to finishing the negotiation. Now, they didn't have to make that determination Wednesday, I guess it was, when we spoke. Yeah. Because we hadn't finalized all the terms of the deal. We were still negotiating the deal. And as it turns out, as I've just described, the Americans changed a number of those terms, introduced new elements, made it uneconomic. And so we're not asking the premiers to do anything today except work together to support our businesses and build the country strong.
And I'll underscore that last point, which, and I said this on Monday in St. John's, for the future of the country, the Churchill agreement, Quebec and Newfoundland and Labrador supported by the federal government. That agreement and those initiatives are the most important initiatives for the future of our country. As important as trade is with the US and as dramatic as the issues are and the response that we have to give in certain industries, what we're doing ourselves, premiers, the federal government, truly Canadians, is far, far more important. It dominates. Thank you.
Moderator 35:22 ↗
Next question.
Mike Blanchfield 35:23 ↗
Good morning, Prime Minister. Mike Blanchfield, Politico Canada. You've outlined a few things that the Americans asked for that were unacceptable in Canada. Did they ask about critical minerals, given their importance, their requirement for it, and how did that play out and what happened at the last minute?
Mark Carney 35:42 ↗
Yeah, thank you for the question. Look, the critical minerals, other aspects of energy, but let's focus in on your question. Critical minerals, there is a real opportunity for cooperation between Canada and the United States on critical minerals, just as there is cooperation between Canada and the other G7 countries, like-minded countries, on critical minerals.
We are demonstrating that cooperation right now. Over the course of the last 12 months, we've signed 50 deals, or you know, it's on the order of $50 billion worth of transactions in critical minerals, stockpiling, other forms, and having the US as part of that process and merging some of the processes that the US have.
They have a tariff initiative that they've worked on. We have the G7 action plan which we launched in Kananaskis. Bringing those together makes sense. Good opportunity, kind of thing you do as part of a trade deal. One of the reasons to do a trade deal with Canada. So yes, makes sense.
Now, in the context of the US putting 50% tariffs on a bunch of our businesses, trying to influence our cultural support and language protections, not agreeing to sensible economic terms for our core industry in autos, you know, we've got a lot of demand for critical minerals. So there's less opportunity to cooperate with the United States. That is a missed opportunity as a consequence of what's happened, but we didn't cause it to happen.
Mike Blanchfield 37:13 ↗
Did they ask for exclusive access to our critical minerals?
Mark Carney 37:16 ↗
We would never give exclusive access.
Mike Blanchfield 37:18 ↗
And did Canada do anything at the last minute that could have triggered this? Did you make any asks or offers?
Mark Carney 37:24 ↗
No, there's a short answer. From our perspective, we clarified what was on offer. And we're continually disappointed by the answers.
Moderator 37:33 ↗
Next question.
Greg Quinn 37:36 ↗
Good morning. Greg Quinn, Market News. Your midnight statement mentioned part of the breakdown was the reliability of any deal. What do you say to other global business and government leaders around the world who can wonder if the US can be trusted from here? If Donald Trump can't execute the art of the deal with friendly Canada, who can you do business with?

21 more exchanges in this transcript

Sign in free to read the rest of this interview. No card required.

Sign in to read the full transcript

Cite this transcript

APA, MLA, BibTeX
APA

Carney, M. (2026, August 22). MARK CARNEY TAKES a HISTORIC STAND against TRUMP — FULL SPEECH and PRESS Q&A [Interview transcript]. Diario AS. CEOInterviews.AI. https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/2956366/

MLA

Mark Carney. "MARK CARNEY TAKES a HISTORIC STAND against TRUMP — FULL SPEECH and PRESS Q&A." Diario AS, 22 Aug. 2026. Transcript, CEOInterviews.AI, https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/2956366/.

BibTeX
@misc{carney2026_2956366,
  author       = {Mark Carney},
  title        = {MARK CARNEY TAKES a HISTORIC STAND against TRUMP — FULL SPEECH and PRESS Q\&A},
  howpublished = {Interview transcript, Diario AS. CEOInterviews.AI},
  year         = {2026},
  month        = {aug},
  url          = {https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/2956366/},
  note         = {Speaker-attributed transcript with timestamps}
}