Every single time the tech companies come to music, convenience wins and quality suffers.
So, it's a complicated web there that you just spun.
I'm having an existential crisis here.
I'm going to try to help you.
Do you think that there's any pressure on Bose? There's tariffs. There's a lot of focus on what gets made in China.
Since co supply chain has become a more exciting environment.
Do you need the OpenAI agent to say, "I'm playing it on your Bose speakers." And then you collect a tiny little licensing check back, or like how should that work?
Hello and welcome to Decoder. I'm Nilay Patel, editor-in-chief of The Verge. And Decoder is my show about big ideas and other problems. Today I'm talking with Laya Snyder, who is the CEO of Bose. Laya was last on the show about 4 years ago, and since then she's dramatically rearchitected the company. The focus on research is still there, but she sold off Bose Professional, acquired the high-end luxury audio brands, Macintosh Labs and Sonus Faber, and perhaps most importantly started licensing all of that core Bose technology to other companies. That means that while you can still go buy a Bose soundbar or Bose headphones, the company is also turning into a B2B business and you can now get Bose technology in Skull Candy headphones and Epson projectors among many other products. This is pure decoder bait. Big change in the business comes with a big change in structure. Becoming a software company in addition to a product company comes with a whole new set of challenges. And Laya and I talked quite a bit about how it's all working out. Okay. Bose CEO Laya Snider. Here we go. Laya Snyder, you're the CEO of Bose. Welcome back to Decoder.
I am really excited to talk to you. It's been four years since you were last on the show, which seems entirely too long.
A lot of things have happened. Bose has bought some companies. You've sold some divisions. The idea of what headphones are is largely the same in one important way, but maybe going to be very different in another important way. How are you thinking about Bose today?
We are having a lot of fun in what I would describe as our second chapter of the transformation of Bose since I joined. And so, as you said, in some ways, many things are the same. We're still making amazing products for our customers. We're still excited about bringing that new technology forward in both our consumer business and our automotive business. But I would say two things fundamentally have changed as we've thought about growth for Bose for the future. For 60 years it was all Bose and we're now a multibrand company. So as you said we've made a couple of acquisitions. One of those was of the Macintosh brand. So, a legendary 75-year-old audio file brand that we absolutely love and also Sonus Fabber, which is an Italian craftsmanship heritage brand that's also been around for over 40 years. And so, that made us brought us two things from one brand to multibrands, but also into the luxury audio space. Second change for us is we've always been an amazing products company where we develop technology through research and a lot of development cycles and all of that technology went into Bose products and today what's different is we're still doing that and we've added a technology business we call audio tech where we're taking that technology and starting to put it into other places and the big insight for us was sound is really important. It's getting more important, we think, given everything that's going on in the world around us. And there are so many products, devices, that are out there that are using sound, whether that's audio or voice or even noise cancelling where those things are incredibly relevant, but they're not products that Bose would make. They're not targeted at our customer set, but we really have a strong belief in bringing great audio to as many places as we can.
The last time we talked you were in the middle of becoming a more functional company in particular. You had said you had the last step was the engineering organization which is really the heart of Bose and it had been very divisional very organized into products. You were centralizing that.
Having an audio tech division that sells core technology feels like a very natural offshoot of that, right? We're going to have a big central engineering team. It's going to feed into our products and other products and then you can abstract that a little bit and sell it to other people. Who are the customers for the audio tech division?
So, it's a B2B TTOC business, if you will. So, our customers are large companies that are putting products into the market. So, I'll give you a couple of examples. We've partnered with Motorola on a series of products from earbuds to making the phone itself sound better. So, a Motorola is a good example. We partnered with XRE. They're making pretty awesome VR XR glasses, right? So, that's an experience where sound really matters a lot. So, we've had a lot of fun partnering with them, and you're starting to see Bose technology show up in a lot of different verticals from mobile to compute to, you know, other people's headphones and audio products for sure. But you know we just released with a partner called Senna a motorcycle helmet communications device and we're excited about all the places we're bringing our new our technology and it's actually creating a broader aperture for how we think about invention and research at Bose as well which is really exciting.
Yeah, I want to come to that because that seems like a big change and the reason I asked about customers is that having a new set of customers really changes the focus of the company. A lot of us are familiar with, you know, audio brands in particular partnering with device makers, partnering with automakers.
And maybe it's just a logo. I think you have been very proud that Bose has not been just a logo in many places, but for a lot of people, it's just a logo. What's the difference between okay, there's actual glasses powered by Bose with a Bose logo on the side and selling the technology without the Bose logo or does a Bose logo always come with it?
When you said this is new for Bose in a way yes but in a way it's exactly what we've been doing in automotive for over 40 years and so we do have a model for doing this inside the company and it's just broadening that thinking into new spaces. First and foremost we're selling technology and the technology is the key and then in some cases we're also selling the brand so you might get technology in a product without a sound by Bose or powered by Bose logo on it or you might get the logo as well, but you'll never get the logo without the tech, if that makes sense. Some of our partners are interested in the brand, some are not. Sometimes we're interested in having our brand on connected to their brand and sometimes we're not. And so that's part of the discussion we have with each of our customers about whether it makes sense for them and for us. And so, you know, when you see it, know that it's been really thoughtful, but it's also attached to a lot of great technology that's inside that product.
Tell me about those conversations. Is it cheaper to take the brand? Is it more expensive to take the brand? This is one of those places where Bose has maybe a bigger, more famous brand than maybe some of the customers. How are you thinking about that? And how does a cost change?
As you would expect, the technology has a licensing fee to it and so does the brand. We've invested over 60 years in our brand. We're incredibly proud of it. It is, I think, one of the most iconic brands in the world, full stop and certainly within the audio space and so we are incredibly careful about where we put the brand and it certainly isn't free when you put it on a product.
Right next to that is Macintosh as you know I grew up just a total stereo nerd just reading the magazines dreaming about having blue meters in my house someday still working on it when you get there.
I did have a Jeep with a Macintosh sound system several years ago. The blue meters were they it was a very fake Android app that ran on a very slow Android infotainment system, but I still loved it.
Okay, that's a brand that has a real Halo. You can't make cheaper Macintosh products. That's not good for that brand. They need to stay way up there. How are you thinking about that relationship to Bose, which is much more of a premium mass market brand?
We think of them as two completely separate brands. And then, you know, think about Sonus Fabber as yet another third brand, all of which are targeting really passionate fans of those brands for what they stand for. So when we thought about the getting into the luxury space and acquiring those two brands, we spent a lot of time saying what is it that we're going to do internally to protect the brands, right? That we do not want to boify anything that is happening in those brands. And so we've set it up as a separate business unit. We have a luxury audio business unit that houses those two brands. We are very careful as you said we have no intention of bringing products down market. We believe both markets are exciting. We've been in that premium audio space for a long time. And when we looked at what we're calling luxury audio, we had two really important insights. I think one is that as we're doing our own technology work, there's a lot of really exciting technology we develop that just isn't right for a premium audio product. It's right for something that sits at a higher level. And we just didn't have anywhere to put it. And that was true on the consumer product side and it's certainly true on the automotive side where we felt like we were bumping up against what you could put in a premium product and the ceiling of what we wanted to do was much higher. So the first reason we're excited about it is it sort of unleashes the creativity of our engineers to think about what you could do at those higher price points with just a different type of customer, a different type of experience. So we were excited on the technology side, equally excited I think about this idea of luxury. If you look at the luxury market at large across all categories, what you find is that audio is really under represented compared to the role luxury plays in automotive or hospitality and travel or fashion, leather goods. And when we really sat back and thought about it, given how much music is a passion point for people, it didn't make sense to us. We think there's a huge opportunity to attract new customers to the category if the experience feels more like a luxury experience. And so, you know, when you think about those products, it's certainly about how they sound. But you went right to it. It's the iconic design, it's the artistry, it's the craftsmanship. All of our luxury products, whether it's Macintosh or Sonus Fabber, are handmade. They are crafted one by one for you as the customer. And there's something incredibly special about that.
These weren't your decisions, so I feel like I can be a little bit rude about them. When I saw Macintosh was licensing to Stalantis to be in Jeeps, I thought this company has to be desperate for money, right? Like that's not actually a match. And it was fun that I had a Jeep with blue meters in it. It was great. But I thought to myself, this is a total mismatch. And you know they should be in Maybox or like whatever it is, whatever luxury sector that you want to be in because that's the brand. Was this just opportunistic for you that this was a company that needed to help that was in trouble that you could go and you could push your products up market without having to take the Bose brand there or was there some other opportunity that presented itself to you?
We weren't actually shopping for brands first. The first thing was strategically we saw the opportunity in luxury space. We saw an opportunity to create something new around luxury audio and we were really excited about that. And so once we had made this strategic decision to go there, we had a lot of conversation about buy a brand or create a brand. But the reality is in luxury at those price points, history and heritage is part of what you're buying. And so we sort of intuitively knew we wanted to find a brand or brands that really had that strong history that we felt like we could build on top of. We thought those were both brands that had incredibly passionate fans and we saw opportunity for us to take them to a new level and so that was how we ended up acquiring the Macintosh Group.
When you brought in their engineering organization, they have a lot of technology.
How integrated has that become over time or are you leaving them alone?
So we've brought it into our engineering organization but we've also kept a lot of the aspects a little bit separate. So the probably the best example of that is Bose has a Bose sound. Everybody knows that. You buy a Bose product, you buy one the headphones I'm wearing, you know, the speaker in your house, your car, there is a sound signature to brands that consumers expect. And so that comes from the engineers, right? The engineers are tuning products to sound like they should. And so we're very careful on the engineering side to protect the sound signature of Macintosh. What we don't want is for you to hear a Macintosh product or a Sonus Fabber product and imagine that it sounds different. So that's one. And initially like you do with I think any acquisition, you want to be careful to protect what you bought. So we've integrated it. Yes. But we have a separate team that is doing the engineering for luxury and we're slowly kind of adding Bose technology to it where it makes sense. So there are things for example on the Bose side where we can be incredibly helpful in terms of you know the software aspects the connectivity those sorts of things those are things that we do really well and they're not the most important part of those products but they have to work and so there are aspects that we've started to add into the products and you'll see more of that over time.
I'm really curious about that luxury aspect. The knock on high-end audio for years, and I'm not saying this is Macintosh, but the knock on high-end audio for years is it's the same stuff all dressed up, fancy, and literally there are headphones that are famous for having weights in them to feel heavier, even though they're commodity parts inside. This is one of those places where you could just say, "We're just going to make more expensive versions of the same thing." And some buyers are totally price insensitive and that they will always just buy the most expensive thing. Then there's we're gonna make it worth it, right? We're going to make it worth 10x the price of whatever Bluetooth speakers are at Best Buy. Where are you falling on that? Because it's very tempting, especially in luxury, to just make it expensive.
The value comes from the sound. You know, if you visit us at Bose, you should come visit us at Bose in Framingham and you listen to a Macintosh system, a Sonus Fabber system, they're incredible. They're not anything like what you would get at a Best Buy in a premium product from Bose or anyone else. And that's incredibly special. Part of that is the technology itself. Part of that is that it is more analog. So it has a different sound signature to it. It's got a lot more power behind it because that's what certainly Macintosh is known for and that's what you need to power a Sonus Fabber set of speakers. You're also paying for design. You're paying in a way. It's a little bit of art. We just launched a new integrated amplifier, the MA2375 for Macintosh. I'm so excited about it. It's sort of got that retro look with the vacuum tubes. It is just such a It is a design piece. I want to sit it, you know, on my desk. I want it to be, you know, I want it to be a part of the decor. You would say the same thing on the Sonus Fabber side. It's like buying an incredible piece of Italian furniture that has been handmade with natural materials and just feels like art that also sounds beautiful. So there's more to the value proposition in the luxury space. It's true in the premium space too. Design really matters. Color matters, feel, touch, comfort, all those things matter in addition to the sound. I think it's just even that much more elevated in the luxury space.
I'm really curious about all the different sets of new customers you're describing, right? There's the B2B business, which is growing in audio tech. Then there's luxury customers who are they have a lot of money, but they're fickle. And particularly in high-end AV, and I'm a high-end AV nerd through and through, convincing people it's worth it because they can hear it has always been the hardest problem.
And maybe the most fun problem because you can convince a lot of people they're hearing a lot of things that aren't there, right? You can sell expensive cables at 100 times the price of regular cables even if they don't do anything different. This is a lot of new customers for Bose. Do you think the B2B business is going to distract your core technology roadmap? How are you holding that all together?
It is more complexity for sure. It is a broader mission and I think we're ready for it. So when I was here last time, we were in the middle of the transformation that I would say was solidifying the foundation of Bose and now we're building on top of that. So we've built an amazing marketing and brand infrastructure that we're now using to power three brands instead of one. But a lot of that capability can be put in the direction of all three. So the key is real clarity about who the customer is which we've done a lot of work on the Bose brand for sure and you know we talk about the music lover for Bose but we've done the same work for Macintosh and the same work for Sonus Fabber so that we are a thousand percent clear who the customer is and how we want to talk to that customer. So on the products side of our company, I think really clear about what the mission is for each one of those brands. On the technology side, interestingly, as we become more of a B2B technology company, it's actually creating advantages back to the Bose brand and our luxury business as well. And what I mean by that is it's caused us to completely rethink the way that we do research and we develop our tech. So when in the past if you think about Bose developing products we were developing purpose-built technology for a pair of headphones or a car audio system and you know I think last time we talked about the tech franchises we care a lot about noise cancellation we care about immersive lifelike audio and we care about this idea of hearing what you want and those are all experiences that are built on some basic building blocks of technology that we've been developing for a long time, but because we were developing them for our own products, we've had to do a bit of a complete shift in the way that we think about it. So that we're now developing kind of ground up those building blocks and now we're able to say with common platforms with common algorithms AI think of them as sort of AI units we can create different experiences for our own products and we can port that same technology through the same platform tech into other people's products. What that's creating is a lot of efficiency at the research and development level. It's creating more breadth because now that we're thinking about things like noise cancellation for different spaces or spatial audio or hearing what you want, it actually is creating more innovation and more invention at the core and it's making us faster because we've made these building blocks a lot more consumable for our B2B customers. Guess what? Makes us faster at bringing our own products to market, too.
I think this is a great place to ask the decoder questions because you're describing the end point of a pretty big culture and structure shift at Bose that you've been architecting for several years. So how is Bose structured today?
So you know there's a business unit structure, there's a functional structure and we are living in what I would describe as hybrid. So for the core functions that matter deeply to what we deliver, like engineering, like marketing, like supply chain, those are global functions that support all of our businesses. But because we've added new customer sets, and really two new businesses with luxury and audio tech, we're also running four business units. So those four business units have business unit presidents and they draw on the global functions for the work that they need.
How many people are is Bose today?
And you're mostly in Framingham or are you all over the place?
We're global all over the place.
And then how's that split between the you said you're hybrid. How's that split between engineering, sales, all that sort of thing?
I don't actually think about it that way, but the one thing that I do know is that is sort of the most important statistic to me is half of our employees are engineers.
You're describing AWS. You're describing Amazon, right? You've modularized a bunch of components inside the company. Now you can build new products faster. This is really great. Every company that goes through this transition ends up hiring more and more engineers over time because you just need to build more and more components. Has that been growing? Are you investing more in that kind of engineering?
We are for sure. So I think probably not unique to us, you know, we've been in this transition of hardware long long ago just hardware and then hardware and software and then more and more software. And now as we're building the technology pieces, those are you truly just software products that are and algorithm kind of AI based products that we're selling in. And so you see that mix shift continuing. We're certainly seeing growth in our engineering ranks. And we've got a lot more productivity out of engineering as we start to have more sophisticated tools as we use AI and other things to help with some of that development. So, yes, growing and I think more productivity per engineer, if you will, as we start to use more sophisticated tools to do the development.
You said it's pure software products, right? When you sell out to B2B, you're just selling the algorithms. Do those feel protectable? This is one of the things that I think about all the time, like what is the actual thing you're selling and how easily can it be copied by a Chinese firm that does not respect our intellectual property laws or something like that.
Yeah, I'm probably oversimplifying. We're really selling three things. We're definitely selling software, algorithms, etc. I'll come back to your how do you protect it question. One of the very special things about Bose is actually systems engineering, which is an underappreciated discipline in my view. So, software is great, but software has to run on hardware in our world, right? Ultimately, that software has to get delivered through something. And the magic at Bose, I think the secret sauce has always been systems engineering and how you're marrying together hardware elements, software elements for an experience that feels unified across the device and that's optimized to provide the best experiences. So we're certainly doing that on our own products, but you see that kind of a service as we start to sell more and more technology into our B2B customers. There's also a lot of desire for help on that system side because our expertise there is real. That's always been true in automotive in our automotive business. And it is increasingly true in our partnerships and our customers on the audio tech side as well. So I think that's a second piece which is really important to call out is that it's not just software for software sake. It's software that has to be integrated into a system where everything comes together to work. And then you've got kind of the idea of systems engineering and then services on top of that. So how you tune a product. Some of our partners and customers need help with that, want help with that, some don't. So you know there are a lot of services that get married along. Sometimes it's the systems engineering, sometimes it's things like tuning, etc. So three pieces.
Can I play devil's advocate here for one second? What you're describing here, if you wanted to poke at it as hard as you could, is a process of a little bit of commodification, right? There's a lot of common components here and then it's the layers on top that differentiate in the market. And if you're an audio nerd, you know, the magazines are all like one engineer in their garage innovated on speaker technology and they made the speaker cones out of waffle paper and now they're more transparent than ever. Whatever that myth was that sold a lot of speakers back in the day. If you're not starting from the products back, but you're starting from the components up, is there a risk that everything kind of becomes the same and it's branding and marketing and maybe you know the sound signature that's tuned into it is artificial now. It's not from the components themselves. How do you balance that or is that just not a worry with modern consumers? I think what you're describing is if we're putting Bose technology in other headphones, doesn't that just revert to the mean?
I think there's a second the bigger market for us is not audio products, things that we call audio second. So, for example, the XR glasses, the main function is not audio, but audio is really important. The car, you don't usually buy a car because it has a Bose sound system, but when you buy the car, the sound system is actually one of the most important features of the car. A projector that you buy for your house, you're buying because it's a great projector. We're partnering with Epson, but the sound is also really important there. So, it's a little bit different, I think, when you get into audio. Second, in the audio market, I think the key is there are so many different customers who want different things. And so when you think about products that have ingredient technology that's the same, it's really enabling you to do things for your customer and the experience that you're trying to create. So I'll just use Skull Candy as an example. Skull Candy just launched a pair of headphones with Sound by Bose and you couldn't have two more diverse customer sets, right, between who they're targeting and who we're targeting. We helped them with the technology, right? So there's Bose technology inside to help make that sound better, but the design choices of what they want for their customer are incredibly different than what you would find. And so I don't think you would ever put those two products, a Bose headphone and a Skull Candy headphone side by side and say, "Wow, this is really commoditized. It sounds the same." It is the same. They're very, very, very different.