Here's a technology that is potentially more dangerous than nuclear weapons. We didn't let Oppenheimer start a company and start selling bombs to China.
That's a good comparison.
Hi everyone, this is Pivot from New York Magazine and the Vox Media Podcast Network. I'm Kara Swisher.
And I'm — who am I? I'm Scott Galloway. Sorry, I'm jetlagged is what I am. So, um, uh, first off, I have to ask you, by the way, you've been doing a lot of stuff, but did you watch the enhanced games last weekend?
I didn't, although I got to be honest, I'm sort of here for it. I mean, I kind of had this idea to just take no holds barred and let freak shows show up. Uh, people are doing this to themselves anyways, but I did not watch it. Although,
let me just say, for people who don't know, the enhanced games is a new sports event that allows athletes on performance-enhancing drugs and encourages them to try to break world records. Events included swimming, track and field, weightlifting, and strongmen. The experiment calls itself a global movement that unites humanity. Of course, it is a publicly traded company. Investors include Donald Trump Jr. and Peter Thiel. There's also a German executive I've met many times who's really into it. Um, there were no things broken except by someone who was wearing the swimsuit that was barred — this special swimsuit. I don't know. The stock has gone down. I'm curious if there was a fight where both of us were enhanced, who do you think would win, you or I?
Well, you know the answer there.
Yeah, 100%. I've never been in a fight. Yeah. I'm not a violent person. If someone hit me, I wouldn't know what to do.
You've never been in a fight? Wow.
Never been in a fight in my life.
Neither have I, I think. Let me think. That might not be true. No, I haven't. No, I haven't.
No, never. You know, I was beaten up and abused by my ex-wife, but um, no, I was never in a fight. I think that I talk a lot about this — I never miss a chance to virtue signal and preach — but I think one of the core principles for men as they get older is just quite frankly emotional regulation. You know, are you willing to sit in discomfort and do you have control over your physical and mental well-being?
Well, it's an impulse to punch, right? It's an impulse to punch and men have it much more. I have — well, let me think. Saul's probably the most aggressive of my sons.
So, there's no arguing that men are more violent, but that doesn't mean women don't engage in violence. Domestic violence rates in LGBTQ couples is about 25% according to the National Institute for Health, and according to the CDC, anywhere from 17 to 40% of men are victims of intimate partner violence depending on the research methodology. There's a discrepancy between whether it was a phone survey or a web survey. And then furthermore, there's only three shelters across the entire US devoted to male domestic violence. Um, there's still a lot of shame and there's a view that it might be underreported.
Mostly women suffer from this problem, Scott.
Yeah, but it's true. There's an assumption.
Yes, I get it. Most violence is committed by men in general. In general, murders, blah blah everything. Every statistic is largely men. It's not really — it's just I do think it's a function of gender. I do think it's a function of impulse control and everything else, but I'm no scientist.
Testosterone and cultural norms and — Yep. Yep. Yep. Yep. Manliness, this man. There was a really great cover of The Atlantic recently about the sort of man-hating groups and they're always back. They're always like, they're back. I'm like, they're always there in some weird way. Um, speaking of men, there's construction crews building the UFC fighting cage on the south lawn of the White House in preparation for the night of mixed martial arts celebrating the 250th anniversary of US independence. Over 4,000 spectators plan to watch from inside the arena. Kind of looks like a roller coaster. And uh, there's all this complaining by Joe Rogan and others about gnats and bugs outside. And some of the champions aren't coming because they don't usually do it outside. Um, and it creates a — if you're going for world, you know, these are actual competitors. If you're going for titles, it's not a good thing to fight outside apparently. Um, weigh-ins will be held at the Lincoln Memorial, which is — I don't know what to say about that, but okay, fine. Fine. Fine. I just don't know what to say. It looks ridiculous, you know, it feels clownish, but whatever. He's the president. I don't know what to say. I'm not going to get overly angry about it, but it seems ridiculous. But I don't know how you feel.
I was invited. I said no. I don't enjoy that stuff, and I don't need to be, you know, I think it's disingenuous for me to show up and break bread or party with someone who I'm constantly critical of. Uh, the event itself is brilliant.
You think? Oh gosh. There's just an entire generation of young men and quite frankly a lot of women — their mothers and their sisters — who in America, and this will trigger some people, still vote for who they perceive will be most beneficial for their husbands and their sons. And young men are doing really, really poorly. And uh, if you think about government in the United States, largely speaking, has been feminized. If you look at the events, the events are basically like, you know, like the queen was merchandising and throwing them for — government events are very feminine for lack of a better word.
Wait a minute. Come on, Scott. Today you're very anti-women today.
I'm not anti-woman. I don't think feminine is a bad thing. I'm just calling it — government things are feminine. Oh, go to anything at the White House. It feels like it's been designed. Oh, 100%. They're very proper, gentle. They're very feminine. And by the way, that — Yes, men can demonstrate wonderful feminine attributes. I would describe — but the event — Government events and ceremonies tend to be very what people would consider, I think, somewhat more — well, they're not a UFC fight. They're not a competition. The White House dinner comes the closest to sort of something stepping out of what is seen as overly planned, nurturing, appropriate. Yeah, I think the events are very kind of very feminine. And what are these guys doing? They're throwing a UFC fight. And it's kind of — I think you're going to have — they're going to have huge viewership. It says to Trump, reaffirms his view of one of the reasons he won the election, and that is like, I'm a man's man. I see men. I appreciate, quote, for lack of a better term, masculinity. Unfortunately, it's a fucked up weird — but it's a brilliant marketing strategy. Smart.
I'm not — I don't — I think it sometimes works. Like, let me give an example of this attempt to turn James Talarico — like, the Stephen Miller, who is literally the most weak-looking person you've ever seen, um, is calling — you know, he and others are calling because they're terrified of Talarico. So they're pulling out the anti-trans stuff immediately, saying the first trans senator — he doesn't know how to eat barbecue. Is that a — to Ted Cruz? Another like someone I could easily beat in a fight with the tofu barbecue. Uh, the idea of soy boy. I mean, this is not manly in any way. This is like — I don't — and I don't think it works as much anymore with people. Um, it's deeply insulting. It might work in Texas. I hate to say it. I think the Talarico people should take this very seriously because Kamala Harris didn't — with the trans stuff that worked really well in the election and it might work in Texas. But they're trying to, you know, paint him as gay. I think that's what they're — where's the girlfriend? That's what they're — trans? Is he trans? He's a soy boy. You know, this is all like — and what I think about it, it's so grotesque because I'm like, these are all men over 50 or whatever. I don't — I mean, Stephen Miller looks over 50 even though he's younger. Um, but this is this like name-calling, bullying shit that is not part of being a man. Any men I know that I think are decent men. It's fine if people want to do this. When I was a kid, I went to fights with my grandfather and went to wrestling matches. He was a promoter. Um, and he loved it. Um, so I see the entertainment and everything else in it. But the soy boy trans thing that they're pushing on Talarico is so ugly and toxic. And unfortunately, it does work at some point. I don't know if you think it'll work in Texas, but it might. It certainly could.
Yeah. I think there's a fairly large distinction between a sanctioned sport where it's a lot of men in top physical shape. Um, I don't like it. I don't enjoy watching it, but I think that that is a legitimate sport. It's a huge sport. It's I think arguably one of the most successful sports of the last several decades. It's a well-run sport. Um, creates a lot of economic value for many of the fighters. So I, you know, I think you can — I think in a bipartisan way, you can say that the UFC serves a purpose and is successful. That the ugliness around Talarico is not only — one, it's not true, but two, to assume that levying an accusation that someone is gay or trans is supposed to be negative. It trains young people or people that if you call someone that, your opponent doesn't call you something unless they're trying to say to the world that's a negative, right? Absolutely. No, no, 100%. And I hope at some point people regurgitate on things like that and say quite frankly it's, you know, someone we used to call in college — you used to call people — Mhm. Yep. Dikes and fags. Yep. I got it. To be gay is to be bad. It's an insult. And at some point someone says, yeah, and or what — it's like people online call me a Zionist. And I respond, 'Proud Zionist.' I mean, I just — at some point people are going to realize going after people's sexual orientation just says more about you than it says about them.
It does. But it's a tactic. They're trying to drum that in in that race. And unfortunately, it might work in Texas.
Well, it's an indictment on Texas that these people have done the research and decided that it works.
So I hope he responds. I will say this — that — In defense — well, I'm not gay. In defense of James Talarico, he and I follow many of the same people on Instagram. And it's not thought leaders, Kara. It's some scorching hot young ladies who make their living with a webcam. Um, they just — they did it. They also tried to do it to Andy Bashir. They obviously — Beto, everything. You know, it's to me it's mean at the end, misogynistic. And speaking of that, the Justice Department has opened a criminal investigation. Of course, this all leads to the same thing. The Justice Department has opened a criminal investigation into E. Jean Carroll, the former magazine writer who won two civil lawsuits against Trump totaling, you know, close to $90 million in payments tied to sexual abuse and defamation. The DOJ probe is reportedly focused on whether Carroll committed perjury in testimony. Typical, this is what they're doing to — whether it's to Letitia James or whoever they're trying to go at. Um, specifically, Carroll saying she hadn't received outside funding for her legal bills. Her lawyers later said Reid Hoffman had contributed. This is the latest in a series of DOJ probes targeting Trump's opponents and critics like James Comey, Letitia James, and others. Though none of these investigations have led to convictions. In fact, they get laughed out of court. Um, I spoke to E. Jean Carroll for an episode of On in July 2025. She talked about the threats she's received and why she has no fear. Let's listen.
It's stupid to be afraid. Why live your life that way? I've been here 81 years and I'm not going to waste the last of it worrying about that guy in marmalade-colored makeup. It makes no sense. So that's what I'm going to do.
So what do you think about this? This talk about misogyny and getting — you know, she's won the cases against him and he's trying not to pay them and he's doing everything possible to try not to pay them. And this is the latest ploy using the Justice Department to carry out his toxic misogynistic efforts.
I think it comes down to this. So one, if she did say something that wasn't true under oath, that's real. Um, and they're claiming that she didn't acknowledge that she was getting help with her legal bills. I don't know to the extent though in a case like that that is grounds for revisiting a case when it doesn't matter, when it doesn't have anything to do with the actual crime she's accusing the president of. What is consistent here is the weaponization of the DOJ to go after his political enemies.
So, this is just another example of the fact that we don't have a government that's meant to protect the people. It's now there to protect the president. I mean, just to keep in mind, folks, this was a jury of his peers who heard a ton of evidence and they said, 'Well, it was in liberal New York.' Well, okay, New York, if you had nine jurors, five are probably Democrats, but four Republicans and two — to reach a conviction, all nine have to agree. So this was a — you know, this was — there's a reason that when someone is usually convicted of a crime the public used to come together and say this person is guilty and, you know, should be disqualified or, you know, we keep — every time this stuff happened we kept thinking that's it, over, and it wasn't. But it's just — I do think it's important to have a legal scholar to say in most cases with this type of infraction if in fact she — and she did. She did not acknowledge that she was having her legal bills paid. Depends on when she was paid. They're going to have to investigate that. But still, they're just grabbing at straws here is what they're doing. That's what they're trying to do, to find some way to impugn her and so he doesn't have to pay that money. It's all the same. It's all about money.
I don't even think it's about the money. I think it's about overturning a conviction of a perceived enemy and going after her.
I think the guy's made billions of dollars illegally on crypto. I think — He still doesn't want to pay. He's a cheap bastard. He still doesn't want to pay.
I'm personally surprised they did this. I would have thought they would — I think this just brings it up again. I would have thought they would want it to fade into the distance.
