CEOInterviews.AI
Start App
Mike Belshe
CEO & Co-Founder, BitGo

In an Age Where AI Can Even Hack Banks, Are Your Assets Safe? Why the BitGo CEO Is Putting Up 100...

📅 Oct 06, 2026 PLUS TV (플러스 TV) 36 MIN 97379 VIEWS 43 SEGMENTS · 2 SPEAKERS
INSIDERS' REPORT EP.25 Featuring: Shuka (MC) | Mike Belshe, CEO of BitGo *This video was filmed on October 1, 2026. [Content summarized via AI] This episode covers the role of the digital asset custody industry and the inflow of institutional funds into the virtual asset market. Key topics include the differences between exchanges and professional custodians, the sustainability of long-term Bitcoin investment, the outlook for USD and KRW stablecoins, and the background of BitGo's entry into the Korean market through its domestic VASP registration. It also emphasizes the importance of thoro...

What Mike Belshe said

Written from the verified transcript and checked against it. Every figure links to the moment it was said.

Mike Belshe, CEO of BitGo, discussed the evolution of digital assets and custody. He explained that BitGo differentiates itself from exchanges by focusing on security, using multisig and MPC technology, deep cold storage, and rigorous audits. He addressed the AI security challenge, noting his 100 Bitcoin bounty remains untouched. Belshe argued that Bitcoin is a scarce asset that will rise against the dollar due to adoption and dollar devaluation. He highlighted institutional adoption, citing Fidelity using BitGo for staking, and discussed tokenized equities as a key innovation. He expressed optimism about Korea's potential in digital assets, noting BitGo recently obtained a VASP license there. He also discussed stablecoins, arguing they offer yield without risk and will be adopted globally, and mentioned the GENIUS Act's current restrictions on yield payments.

Key takeaways

  1. BitGo's 100 Bitcoin AI hacking bounty, worth about $8.4 million at current prices, remains untouched.
  2. BitGo obtained a VASP license in South Korea, becoming the first foreign crypto firm to do so.
  3. Belshe argues Bitcoin is a forever-up instrument against the dollar due to adoption and dollar devaluation.
  4. Fidelity uses BitGo's staking services because they lack the expertise themselves.
  5. Tokenized equities will lead the way, with Robinhood already offering tokenized price exposure outside the US.

Numbers and commitments

FigureWhat it refers toTypeAt
100 Bitcoin Bounty offered to AI for hacking BitGo commitment 11:55
$65,000 Bitcoin price when bounty was issued metric 11:55
$84,000 Current Bitcoin price metric 11:55
$8.4 million Current value of the 100 Bitcoin bounty metric 11:55
92% Decline in dollar purchasing power since 1970 metric 13:39
15 years Age of Bitcoin metric 16:07

Chapters

  1. 0:00Korea's digital asset leadership potential
  2. 4:21BitGo's custody security approach
  3. 7:52BitGo's business model and fees
  4. 9:40Banks as partners, not threats
  5. 11:55AI hacking challenge and bounty
  6. 13:39Institutional adoption drivers
  7. 17:45Strategy and BitMine treasury models
  8. 25:51Stablecoins and yield without risk
  9. 30:01Tokenized equities and issuer-investor relations
  10. 33:25Korean VASP license and market entry

Questions asked in this interview

12
  1. 0:39And since many of our viewers may not be familiar with BitGo, could you briefly explain what kind of company BitGo is?
  2. 3:56In particular, where would individuals or corporations notice the most difference when using this service?
  3. 5:38So I'm curious, from an individual's perspective, how much safety can a professional custodian guarantee?
  4. 9:01Or on the other hand, if banks jump in and the market grows, could that become an opportunity for BitGo?
  5. 11:23The fact that you set up this challenge — do you see AI as a security threat? And what alternatives are there?
  6. 13:10And how much has the actual scale grown?
  7. 17:11Or do you think certain conditions need to be met?
  8. 18:53물론 장기적이겠지만 굉장히 강한 불뷰, 롱뷰라고 할 수 있는데 대표님도 그렇게 생각하십니까?
  9. 21:58비트고가 LA에 있는 기업이기도 하고 또 글로벌 많은 나라들을 볼 텐데, 한국에 또 오시기까지 하고 한국에 있어서 좀 어떤 특별한 가능성을 좀 보시는 게 있으신가요?
  10. 25:00지금 사실은 유로화 스테이블 코인도 잘 안 되고 있지 않습니까?
  11. 28:12그러면 달러 말고 다른 스테이블 코인은 좀 어렵지 않을까 제 개인적으로 이렇게 생각하는데 혹시 그건 어떻게 생각하십니까?
  12. 29:38근데 아직은 이제 한국 사람들은 이제 그걸 몸으로는 못 느끼고 있는데 실제로 가까운 시기에 그런 자산의 토큰화가 좀 일어날 걸로 보십니까?
Mike Belshe 0:00 ↗
Well, look, the Korean market has actually been a leader for a long time. Broadband of the early 2000s — Korea was there first, right? If you're talking about deployment of cell phones, 5G networks, Korea was there first. I think Korea actually could be an amazing leader in terms of digital.
Everything is going to be, and so you're going to be able to have tokenized equities. You're going to see them on chain. You're going to get your stock splits, your dividends, your voting rights all on chain. They move 24 hours a day, seven days a week, all around the globe.
전석제 0:39 ↗
Discovering investment opportunities from the perspective of top-tier insiders. Hello. This is the host of Inside Spotlight, Jeon Seok-je. If tens of billions and hundreds of billions of dollars' worth of Bitcoin are held not by individuals but by corporations and financial institutions, where and how would those assets be entrusted? As institutional money moves in, the custody industry that professionally stores digital assets is also growing rapidly. Today, we'll be joined by Mike Belshe, CEO of BitGo, to discuss what the criteria are for safely entrusting assets, how the market is changing as institutional money comes in, and to share real-world examples. Hello. Yes, CEO, I have some questions for you. Looking at your background, you started companies very early on. I heard you founded Netscape around 2013, and also developed web browsers like Google Chrome. That's what I heard. But what made you turn your attention to the Bitcoin field? And since many of our viewers may not be familiar with BitGo, could you briefly explain what kind of company BitGo is?
Mike Belshe 1:46 ↗
Well, thank you very much. I came from Netscape and spent years working on web browsers, Google early on. I started a couple of companies, sold one to Microsoft. And so one of the things I saw about web technologies is that we weren't able to go and do payments directly in browsers and servers. Instead, we had to overlay the World Wide Web with credit card payments. And by the way, very deep inside of the HTTP protocol is this thing called 402, which is 'error, payment required.' It had never really been used before. When I first learned about Bitcoin — well, when I first learned about it, I thought it was probably a scam, like everybody. But then I read into it and I was like, 'Wait, this actually works.' And then you realize this is money inside your computer. And when you do your first payment where you've got money inside your computer and I can send it to you and you receive it, and there was no bank and there was no magic out there. It was just a transfer. It's really an eye-opening moment. So, seeing that, that was when I got excited about it. You know, where digital assets would go, I didn't necessarily know. I'm not a forecaster, I guess. But that was huge power. And when you see something that's got that kind of power, you realize, wait a minute, this could really change the way everything works. And I was probably incredibly naive. I didn't know nearly what I needed to know about the financial system and how long it would take for this to take root. But I think where it's gone absolutely fulfills that expectation that it would have a massive change. We're not just talking about digital assets and DeFi anymore. We're talking about tokenized equities. And it's not just our industry. It's Larry Fink, the CEO of BlackRock, the world's largest asset manager. It's Fidelity. It's Morgan Stanley. It's Citibank. Down the line, all of these guys are there as well. So tokenized equities are happening, and stablecoins — the banking system is going to change as well, all because we couldn't move money between two points and couldn't do that before.
전석제 3:56 ↗
CEO, since many people haven't really used custody services before, a lot of people think, 'Can't I just keep my coins on an exchange?' How is keeping coins on an exchange different from keeping them with a professional custodian like BitGo? In particular, where would individuals or corporations notice the most difference when using this service? I'm curious about this.
Mike Belshe 4:21 ↗
From an end user's perspective, they might not notice very much. But if you look at markets around the globe, typically there's a market structure which separates certain duties from other duties. At the heart of markets is usually an exchange. And then there's often broker-dealers that provide access to that exchange, but exchanges don't usually hold custody on their own. Now, the way digital assets have evolved — in the early days, there were no custodians. There were no banks that could hold the digital assets. So many exchanges took on that duty where they host it on their own. And of course, there's been a lot of treacherous pitfalls over the last 10 years where certain exchanges have not done that as well. So an exchange, their focus is on trading. What they want to do is lots of different coins, lots of different clients, lots of different assets, and facilitate tons of trading. BitGo's focus is different. We're focused at the lower levels. We're focused on security. So we start with a wallet platform, which is the most secure way that you can store digital assets. We take care of multisig. That's what we pioneered on Bitcoin. Today it's multisig, also MPC, which is another technology protocol that we use in order to secure the funds. We hold all the assets in deep cold storage, and then we do all kinds of audits and access controls.
전석제 5:38 ↗
Actually, there are quite a few people who worry about the safety when they entrust their assets to custody. Many people worry that once it's hacked, it can't be recovered. So I'm curious, from an individual's perspective, how much safety can a professional custodian guarantee?
Mike Belshe 6:09 ↗
The number one thing goes back to basic security principles: there are no single points of failure. That means typically people have like a single private key that protects their funds. We don't do that. We use three different private keys, and so if a single machine is breached, then you don't have access to the funds. You have to go and breach multiple machines. Now, security is a security-in-depth type of offering. So in addition to doing the proactive, offensive types of security, we also do defensive security, which is, you know, making sure that we're constantly watching our perimeter. We know if anybody were to intrude, etc. You know, we go and do audits. We have third parties come in that try to break in. We then go get SOC audits, which is measuring our operational controls. A lot of times people are worried about cryptography, but remember, humans are kind of the weakest link. Humans make mistakes. And so the operating controls make sure that we have a rigor and a discipline around everything we do.
전석제 7:16 ↗
CEO, I now understand to some extent that entrusting money to BitGo makes it safe. I've grasped the concept of custody. But what I'm curious about next is, how does BitGo actually make money? We just entrusted our money. Banks make money from the difference between deposits and loans. So how does BitGo make money?
Mike Belshe 7:52 ↗
So we have to charge fees. We have services here. The basic license we have is for custody and transfer services, so that we're going to have to charge fees for. But what we do is we continue to build plumbing into other parts of finance. So, you know, you go to your bank, you go to your custodian, and you're expecting to be able to store securely, but you also want to be able to put it to work. So in the crypto world, you want to be able to do staking. That's a simple way. So if you have Ethereum, you can stake it. We take a small piece of the Ethereum staking reward that comes back. When we continue to build out services, we make connectivity to exchanges and trading, and we provide, you know, borrow and lend types of services. Those can all be done on top of the overall custody. So anyway, here in Korea, I want to be clear that the initial license we get — and this is how we've evolved in every jurisdiction — we always start out with like, let's build the foundation. You can't build a financial system unless you've got the foundation right. So we build that really strong foundation, and then from there we can build the connectivity. And yes, fees are what pay the bills.
전석제 9:01 ↗
Banks used to be institutions that primarily custodied traditional, underlying assets, didn't they? But these days, it seems their interest in digital asset custody has grown a lot. If banks jump into this market, they're such large companies — I wonder if that could be a threat to BitGo. Or on the other hand, if banks jump in and the market grows, could that become an opportunity for BitGo? I'm curious which way you see it, and how BitGo, as a professional custodian, plans to seize the opportunity in between.
Mike Belshe 9:40 ↗
Individuals and retail users want this. Small businesses, large businesses. We want banks to be able to participate. The more people that are using it, the more liquidity, the better the product is. So kind of under any of these circumstances, I think BitGo's okay. A lot of times what we see right now is some of the major financial institutions come into the space. Fidelity — you've probably heard of Fidelity, second largest asset manager in the United States. They initially did all of their own custody for Bitcoin, but eventually they expanded into Ethereum, and then they wanted to do staking, but they don't know how to do staking. So they use BitGo services to do staking on their behalf. So it's an example where they're able to use their banking capabilities, their distribution channels to their clients, but BitGo is able to provide service behind the scenes for them. So BitGo's edge is probably technology and being nimble. Ultimately, what we want to see is innovation. The financial system in the US, in South Korea, globally — and I mean no offense to the existing system — it's somewhat stagnated. There's not a lot of change going on. So we've seen just in the last few years key innovations coming out of the crypto sector. Number one, 24/7 markets. The entire world is responding to this, including the New York Stock Exchange, the NASDAQ, because, you know, it's a global economy. Why is it that Koreans should have to only trade US stocks, you know, Monday through Friday, 9 to 5 New York time? Right? You're not awake in South Korea, right? So that's one innovation. Perpetual futures, another innovation. Stablecoins, another innovation. So there's going to be a line of further and further innovation. It's going to reduce the number of middlemen so that individual investors pay less to their bankers, keep more of their hard-earned money. And we're excited about that. And yes, absolutely, banks should participate and help.
전석제 11:23 ↗
Recently, on SNS — it was X, I think — you posted on X. You said to Claude, 'I'll give you the address of 100 Bitcoin, try to take it. If you can move it, you can have the 100 Bitcoin.' You posted this, and it actually became quite a hot topic on SNS in Korea too. The fact that you set up this challenge — do you see AI as a security threat? And what alternatives are there? I'm curious about this.
Mike Belshe 11:55 ↗
So it had kind of two parts to it. Actually, all the way back to the beginning of, I think, probably 2014, 2015, I considered putting out a honeypot of bitcoins and saying, 'Hack it.' And I didn't do it in the past, but I've been watching what's going on with Anthropic and OpenAI telling the world that they've got these agents that are so out of control that they can't even contain them in their own sandboxes. I don't really agree with that narrative. I do think AI is incredibly impressive. It's a fantastic tool for us to use to help defend against attackers. And so we want to do that. Kind of in response to the claims that they needed help from the government, I wanted to say, 'Look, if you're so great, why don't you hack this? 100 bitcoins right there.' I think at the time I put it out, Bitcoin was at around 65,000. So it was about a half-million-dollar bounty. As of today, you know, Bitcoin's trading at, I think, 84,000. So it's an 8.4 million dollar bounty. So this is a bounty that will just keep going up as long as digital assets go up in value. It did get a lot of attention. The 100 bitcoins, by the way, haven't been touched. Don't have any fear. Logically.
전석제 13:10 ↗
These days, CEO, institutional customers are also buying Bitcoin in large quantities, unlike before — we're seeing that quite a lot. Why do you think they're trying to hold so much Bitcoin or digital assets? And how much has the actual scale grown? I'm curious about these things.
Mike Belshe 13:39 ↗
Warren Buffett has famously said that, you know, the stock market is a great predictor in the long term, but more of a casino in the short term. I don't have that quite right, but I very much agree with that statement. Look, Bitcoin itself has proven that it is a scarce asset, and it will forever go up in price when measured against the US dollar. The reason for that is, A, there's adoption of Bitcoin that's happening globally, so that's more demand for Bitcoin. But secondarily, the value of the dollar is going down. Right since 1970, it's down 92% in terms of what you can buy. And the cause of this, of course, is, you know, government spending of money. So people are looking for alternate assets. And, you know, in the US, it's very much an asset-based world. We talk about a K-shaped economy. If you want to succeed, if you want to build wealth, you have to get your assets out of dollars. You can put it in the stock market, you can put it into property and real estate, you can put it into gold, you can put it into Bitcoin. Bitcoin, of all of those assets, is the one that is the most liquid, transportable around the planet, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. So it's got real value that none of those other assets provide. So that's growing. But then also on institutional adoption, we've got the other use cases that are happening in digital assets. So Bitcoin is a store of value. Ethereum has created a smart contract programming platform, and this is where we see DeFi. So you've probably heard a lot about DeFi. I would say DeFi is still in that more emergent growth. But some institutions are picking up on that. They're interested in the platform that can run these cryptographically signed financial services, and they work pretty well, and you can receive assets via staking on what you're holding. So that's generally a lot of interest. And then lastly, I think the one that's most exciting is payments and stablecoins. Especially now that we live in such a connected globe, money is moving around the planet all the time, and yet our banking institutions can't really move across borders very easily.
전석제 15:40 ↗
But still, aren't there more companies that don't invest in virtual assets right now? It seems like they're worried about something, and there seem to be realistic hurdles as well. What do you think is needed for these institutions to participate more actively in Bitcoin or the virtual asset market?
Mike Belshe 16:07 ↗
Some are more aggressive and some are more conservative. What's happened over the last 10 years is we've been moving that bar for who's willing to invest in digital assets further and further towards the most conservative types of assets. So early days, you know, market makers, prop traders, hedge funds, they all came into the digital asset space. Every single one of those hedge funds out there, they all have some allocation in Bitcoin already. Now, the more conservative investments, when you get all the way down to retirement accounts and pension funds, they're much more heavily regulated. These are individuals' retirement money that you take under risk. Those types of parties should naturally come in later, I think, into any new type of asset class, especially when, you know, early days has a risk. So I think we've been steadily knocking down the risks and eliminating them, getting people comfortable with it. But of course, we're still on a progression, and it's also a new asset. Remember, you know, Bitcoin is 15 years old. Gold is, I'm not sure how many centuries.
전석제 17:11 ↗
For example, in our country, a company called Strategy is very famous. Bitmine is the same. These companies seem to make a strategy of buying up huge amounts of Bitcoin or Ethereum, even though Bitcoin's history is short. As you just mentioned, CEO, since in the long term there's inflation and prices go up, that seems to be the basis of their strategy. Do you think a Strategy or Bitmine-style strategy is somewhat sustainable? Or do you think certain conditions need to be met?
Mike Belshe 17:45 ↗
So we have lots of ways to access Bitcoin. In the early days, you had to buy it yourself, hold it yourself. That's a lot of work for you, right? You've got to figure out where you store it, where you buy it, all that type of thing. Much more contained as a financial service. But the next thing is, there's still people that don't really invest and hold assets or open bank accounts. They already have brokerage accounts, traditional brokerage accounts. So the ETF comes along. So BlackRock has now got...
billion in size for their ETF for Bitcoin. And then Strategy comes along with a slightly different approach. So Strategy and BitMine from Tom Lee, you know, they're taking this digital asset treasury where they're creating companies whose goal is to accumulate more and more Bitcoin, but they will take a leveraged exposure to getting more of the asset. So if you're a believer in the asset, Bitcoin in the case of Strategy or Ethereum in the case of BitMine, you know, those are companies that are going to use their assets, use their strength, use their resources to go and help promote those coins.
전석제 18:53 ↗
대표님이 방금 말씀하시듯 단기적인 시장 조정이 나온다고 말씀하셨지만, 아까 BitMine의 Tom Lee 대표분도 제가 인터뷰를 해 봤거든요. 그때 Tom Lee 선생님이 이더리움을 6만 달러까지 간다고 말씀해 주셨어요. 물론 장기적이겠지만 굉장히 강한 불뷰, 롱뷰라고 할 수 있는데 대표님도 그렇게 생각하십니까?

21 more exchanges in this transcript

Sign in free to read the rest of this interview. No card required.

Sign in to read the full transcript

Cite this transcript

APA, MLA, BibTeX
APA

Belshe, M. (2026, October 6). In an Age Where AI Can Even Hack Banks, Are Your Assets Safe? Why the BitGo CEO Is Putting Up 100... [Interview transcript]. PLUS TV (플러스 TV). CEOInterviews.AI. https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/3008463/

MLA

Mike Belshe. "In an Age Where AI Can Even Hack Banks, Are Your Assets Safe? Why the BitGo CEO Is Putting Up 100...." PLUS TV (플러스 TV), 6 Oct. 2026. Transcript, CEOInterviews.AI, https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/3008463/.

BibTeX
@misc{belshe2026_3008463,
  author       = {Mike Belshe},
  title        = {In an Age Where AI Can Even Hack Banks, Are Your Assets Safe? Why the BitGo CEO Is Putting Up 100...},
  howpublished = {Interview transcript, PLUS TV (플러스 TV). CEOInterviews.AI},
  year         = {2026},
  month        = {oct},
  url          = {https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/3008463/},
  note         = {Speaker-attributed transcript with timestamps}
}