When people say, "I don't like what I do. I'm just going to quit and it'll force me to find something different." No, no, no, no. Don't leave a job until you have another one. Unless you have rich parents and you can do whatever the [__] you want. My sense is it is much harder to find a job when you don't have a job.
And also to just be honest with yourself. Do you have good momentum right now? Are you good at what you do? And should you just tough it out? If none of that is true and you're truly miserable and want to make a pivot, then one, see if you can do a pivot internally, and two, start thinking about other types of jobs. Maybe you want to buy a business from a boomer that is selling a vocational business. It's so situational because the questions I would ask you are, what are you good at? Do you have any capital to invest in a business? Do you know anyone else at other companies who you might be able to join and do something else with a friend or someone you've known for a while? You know, it's very situational.
In today's office hours, we speak about rising Democratic star James Talerico, whether luxury industries are at risk of disruption, and how to handle a job that doesn't align with your values. I have not seen or heard these questions. Question number one, our first question comes from Pristine Butterfly 961 on Reddit. They say, "Prof, what are your thoughts on James Talerico? I listened to your episode with him and Jessica. He was well spoken and seems to be a genuine, down-to-earth guy. Seems like the Dem nominee is up in the air for 2028. If Talerico wins the Senate in Texas, how does that impact his ability to be the Dem nominee in 2028?"
Okay, so some data. Talerico won the Democratic primary on March 3rd with 53% of the vote versus Crockett's 45.6%, and she was a very strong candidate. Kalshi had Talerico at 86% likelihood to win the Democratic primary. Polls showed the race considerably tighter. And then the Texas Senate winner, Kalshi, is also stating that the Republicans have a 65% likelihood of holding the seat versus 35% for Democrats. So it's 2:1 right now, but that's down from 4:1, 80% Republican odds in late 2025. So Talerico is giving — it appears the markets are more hopeful about a Talerico nominee.
Texas is sort of known for producing a Democrat that we all fall in love with and then get our hearts broken. And every time, you know, Democrats around the nation give money to a Texas candidate like a Beto O'Rourke, who was a very attractive candidate, especially against a guy named Ted Cruz, who was, you know, I would argue is an unattractive candidate to most people. And then we get our hearts broken that Texas is just pretty, pretty deep red. But here we are again, hopeful that this outstanding candidate will change that. So if Talerico does in fact win in November, it would be a major shift.
Texas Democrats have not won statewide office in — let me see, I think it was '88, so 12 years. So, oh gosh, almost 40 years. He'll face the winner of the Paxton versus Cornyn Republican runoff on May 26. Right now, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton appears to be the favorite in the runoff, which would be great for Talerico because Paxton — what's the term — is [__] crazy. I mean, that's kind of the problem with our electoral system is we send crazies from the left and crazies from the right.
Talerico is seen as pretty moderate, mostly because he constantly cites scripture and his religious background and weaves it really elegantly into his politics. And I think that appeals to a lot of moderates and probably a lot of people on the right. He's polled slightly better against Paxton than Senator John Cornyn, who's more moderate than Paxton. And I said that if Talerico were able to pull off a big win in Texas and maintain that popularity, that he would be, I think, almost immediately on any short list to be the VP candidate for the Democratic ticket for president in 2028.
If anybody on the ticket delivers Texas for the Democrats in 2028, it's game over. That means the Democrats win. So the prospect of it being, say, a 1 in 3 chance that they can get Texas versus a 1 in 20 chance by putting Talerico on the ticket, it might be worth the risk. It is a risk, though, because they would be giving up the Senate seat, because my understanding is the likely Republican governor would then get to appoint someone to that Senate seat and would appoint a Republican. So given how close the majorities are in the Senate, I'm not sure they would give up the Senate seat.
But if he won big, he's immediately a candidate, as is Jon Ossoff. If Senator Ossoff goes on to win decisively in Georgia, he'll be a likely presidential candidate. And I don't know if you've been watching Senator Ossoff, but he's made a really key strategic move, and messaging and words are so important. Rather than demonizing the billionaire class, he's using this new term, the Epstein class, which is just genius and something the broader Democratic Party should adopt.
Because if you start trying to lead with this progressive rhetoric [__] self-inflicted wound of saying billionaires are evil, white people are racist, and young men are a problem, then all three of those cohorts are going to leave. You know, about 60% of the electorate is white, 30% of the electorate is white males. And if you start with this messaging around successful white males or young white males are, you know, just fundamentally bad by virtue of their identity, they're just going to — okay, fine, have at it. We'll vote Republican. So that's just really stupid messaging that might work, might be red meat in a primary, but in a general, it's suicide.
So he's elevated from that and is now going after what he calls the Epstein class. I think that's genius. But in general, I think whether it's Talerico, Ossoff, Senators Murphy, Bennett, Klobuchar — I just got outreach from Senator Slotkin's office. My sense is she's gearing up for a run. She seems to be very ambitious and going on a lot of programs lately. Good for her. Anyways, and I think they're all, you know, good or great. I think our bench is just incredibly strong. Governor Shapiro, Newsom — I think these are really strong candidates.
And when I look at their bench, it's Rubio and Vance. I think Rubio is going to have a tough time defending some of the past statements he's made. He just comes across as literally like an amorphous blob that'll say anything to try and advance his political career. I also think the war in Iran will land squarely on his shoulders. Also, Vance is just incredibly unlikable. And every president, I would argue since Nixon, has had one thing in common, and that is they're likable. People say Trump isn't, but a lot of people say when you meet Trump, he's very likable and very charismatic. Anyway, we're just going to have to be smarter about it.
There is — just to wrap this up — there's what's called a jungle primary in California, and there's a lot of good or a lot of decent Democrats running, but they're all splitting the vote, and the top two might be two Republicans, and the top two advance to the general election. So you might end up with a Republican because of the fact that there's a lot of decent Democratic candidates splitting the vote.
This is where Speaker Pelosi or Obama or Governor Newsom need to weigh in and start getting deals done, or Senate Majority Leader — Schumer, Senate Minority Leader, excuse me — need to step in and start promising Democrats some sort of appointments or something, or intimidating them or threatening them and get them the [__] out of the race. Anyways, we never underestimate the Democratic Party's ability to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory, but state representative Talerico brings a new dimension to the Democratic Party, and that is the integration of his faith and politics, and Democrats are seen as being openly hostile towards religion, which I think has really, really hurt Democrats.
Support for the show comes from Bilt Rewards. Whether it's rent or a mortgage, the roof over your head is one of your biggest, if not the biggest, monthly expense. Well, in a time where it feels like you earn rewards on anything, why not earn something back on that? You can with Bilt. Bilt started out by rewarding members on their rent. But now, as of 2026, Bilt members can also earn points on mortgage payments, too, wherever they live. Every housing payment earns you points you can use toward trips with top travel partners, including United and Hyatt. You can use them towards Lyft rides, Amazon.com purchases, and so much more.
Bilt members also get access to a neighborhood concierge. You can make restaurant reservations, book fitness classes, and find new local spots. And all this while you're being rewarded at more than 45,000 merchant partners. It's like having a personal assistant baked into where you live. It's simple. Being a renter and now owning a home can feel a whole lot better with Bilt. Join the membership for where you live at joinbilt.com/profg. That's j-o-i-n-b-i-l-t.com/profg. Make sure to use our URL so they know we sent you.
Support for the show comes from LinkedIn Ads. There's no worse feeling than making a major investment in something only to realize it didn't exactly live up to the hype, such as buying a nice piece of tech that ends up in storage collecting dust, or taking a business workshop where your main takeaway was little more than a few motivational words. If you work in marketing, this can happen with ads. You optimize for the numbers that look great — impressions, reach, and reactions. But when they don't show revenue, well, that can turn into an unfun conversation with the CFO.
LinkedIn has a word for that: bull spend. Reach the right buyers with LinkedIn Ads and invest in what looks good to your CFO. According to the 2026 Dream Data Benchmark report, LinkedIn Ads generated the highest ROAS of all major ad networks. It's 121%. You can target by company, industry, job title, and more. It's time to cut the bull spend. Advertise on LinkedIn, the network that works for you. Spend $250 in your first campaign on LinkedIn Ads and get a $250 credit for the next one. Just go to linkedin.com/scott. That's linkedin.com/scott. Terms and conditions apply.
Question number two also comes from Reddit. OKshare363 asks, "Hi, Scott. I've been in the auto industry for 14 years. The last 11 years I've been selling Ferraris. Woohoo. In the last three years, I have noticed a major change in buying habits and the people who buy them. I've witnessed clients age before my eyes, and they are not being replaced by the younger generation. Two questions. What advice do you have for people working in an industry that might look drastically different in 5 to 10 years? And what advice do you have for someone who might be stuck in an industry because it's the only experience they have on their resume?"
I get this question a lot. So, according to the data, Ferrari buyers are actually getting younger. 40% of new Ferrari buyers are now under 40, up from 30% in 2023, according to Ferrari's CEO. I got to think a lot of that's crypto. Sort of the crypto and the manosphere. I can't help it. Anytime I see someone under the age of 40 in a Ferrari, I think they're probably living with their mother or they rent. You should never own a nice car if you rent, in my view. And that is the ultimate — I mean, the real brag is to have a nice home, is to have a place that's clean, well decorated, and comfortable. I think a car is really trying hard, you know, from someone who's owned a bunch of Range Rovers.
This is how I can tell I'm getting older. I'm actually looking at that new Ferrari 12-cylinder. I don't think I would fit in the thing, but I think, "Oh, it's so beautiful. I would just want to park it in my driveway." Yeah. So, it looks as actually as if the buyer is getting younger. Ferrari shipped almost 14,000 cars in 2024 while generating one and a quarter billion dollars in profit. Waiting lists currently sit at 2 years. Jesus, that's amazing. 81% — they manage scarcity almost as well as any brand in the world. The key in luxury is scarcity. And I'll come back to that, but I think it's a key point in managing your own brand.
Anyways, 81% of 2024 Ferrari sales went to existing owners. That's right. They do the same thing with Birkin. I bought someone in my life a Birkin bag and they asked me if I wanted to get on the list for another bag. And I thought, well, okay, if I need to be on a list, I want on the list. 48% of buyers already own multiple Ferraris. Wow. So, half of the people who buy Ferraris already own more than one. The new younger buyer is largely recycling with a closed loop. So in sum, it does look like actually they're getting younger.
But your broader question is what do you do when you kind of have nothing but experience in a certain industry and you're looking to make a pivot. What I would suggest is ask yourself why are you making the pivot and is there a way to make the pivot internally? What do I mean by that? You might think, "I'm sick of sales and I want to be more in marketing or I want to be managing people." Is there a way to go to someone internally and say, "Okay, I've been here a while. Would it be possible? Is there a Ferrari management program? Is there a path to another part of Ferrari where you would get to scratch the itch to do something different?"
When people say, "I don't like what I do. I'm just going to quit and it'll force me to find something different." No, no, no, no. Don't leave a job until you have another one, because unless you have rich parents and you can do whatever the [__] you want. My sense is it is much harder to find a job when you don't have a job. And also to just be honest with yourself. Do you have good momentum right now? Are you saving money? Are you good at what you do? And should you just tough it out? If none of that is true and you're truly miserable and want to make a pivot, then one, see if you can do a pivot internally, and two, maybe start a side hustle or start thinking about other types of jobs.
Maybe you want to buy a business from a boomer that is selling a vocational business. It's so situational because the questions I would ask you are, what are you good at? Do you have any capital to invest in a business? Do you know anyone else at other companies who you might be able to join and do something else with a friend or someone you've known for a while? Have you been presented with any opportunities? What kind of money do you have saved up? You know, it's very situational, but this is what you want to do. You want to put together a kitchen cabinet with two or three people that you trust and ask them for coffee and just lay it all out for them.
Say, you know, "I'm kind of thinking about a career change. I would just love your advice. You're a smart person." And hopefully they'll ask you a bunch of questions. And you can give them a full, transparent lay of the land and they can advise you. But there's no one-size-fits-all here. And I get a lot of outreach from people in the advertising and the agency business, which I used to be in technically as a brand strategist, saying, "I'm in this industry. I know it's dying. What do I do?"
All right. If you're under the age of 35 and you have the ability to jump ship and go to a different part of the marketing ecosystem, specifically the digital part, then get out. But if you're 45 and your clients like you and you're making good money, yeah, I'd say ride it out and just start packing away money such that at 55 or 60, you can quit and do something else, whether it's teaching high school math or being an artist, and you have the money to do whatever you want. But I just hate the idea of leaving when you have momentum. And I again don't know how much momentum you have at Ferrari.
So what do you do? One, see if you could do a pivot internally. Two, assemble a kitchen cabinet of people who can advise you and ask you good questions and help you make this decision because you'd benefit from some outside questions. And I don't make any important decision anymore without talking to a few people. Because I used to think leadership and masculinity was about assessing the situation and making bold, dramatic decisions. No, that's called being reckless. So absolutely start to talk to other people and see what they say and then make a decision.
And also put me on a list for the Ferrari 12 — is it the 12Cilindri, the F167? The front-engine grand tourer featuring a 6.5-liter naturally aspirated V12 engine producing 830 horsepower at 9,250 RPM. Not that I'm going through a midlife crisis. We'll be right back after a quick break.
Some support for the show comes from Vanta. If you're a business owner, you've probably seen the shift. Risk and regulation are rising, and customers now expect proof of security before they'll even sign on. Building that trust is critical to closing deals, but it's often costly, time-consuming, and complex. Vanta says that's exactly the problem they've built to solve. Vanta automates your compliance process to bring compliance, risk, and customer trust together on one AI-powered platform. So whether you're prepping for a SOC 2 or running an entire GRC program, Vanta keeps you secure and keeps your deals moving.
This helps companies get compliant fast and remain compliant, opening doors to next-level growth opportunities and freeing up valuable time. That means no more digging through audits and spreadsheets. Instead, you get a system working quietly in the background, keeping you compliant, reducing risk, and helping your business scale quickly and with confidence. Companies, including Ramp and Ryder, spend 82% less time on audits with Vanta. That's not just faster compliance, it's more time for growth. You can get started at vanta.com/profg. That's v-a-n-t-a.com/profg. vanta.com/profg.
Welcome back. Question number three comes from SAGS on Reddit. "Hi, Scott. I'm 27 and just finished my PhD. I've secured a role in big tech where the work aligns with my talent. The tension is that I don't fully align with the product's impact on society. The work, however, satisfies me intellectually. How do you recommend navigating this disconnect?"
You've already navigated it. You've made a decision. So stop beating yourself up. I don't — I mean, if it gets too much, I don't know, how do you navigate it? Edibles, alcohol, I don't know. Or just acknowledge that you're focused on your own economic security. You know, there's a lot of good people that work in Meta. Meta is not good for the planet. But people have an obligation to make a living. So you've made the decision, boss. You can control what you can control on a regular basis. Ask yourself if that is really weighing on you. But I wouldn't beat yourself up because you made the decision. So try and make as much progress as you can.
You know, I would say this [__]: you can be an internal agent of change. No, trust me. If you're trying to make a change in big tech from the inside, in my view, you're a gnat up against a giant windshield. I think it's got to be regulation. But look, I'm a bit of a capitalist on this stuff. I think you have an obligation to affix your own oxygen mask, take care of yourself, build economic security, and if you're in a position to — then if it becomes overwhelming for you, if you find out that one in eight girls in the UK cite Instagram as a means or a catalyst for self-harm, which is data they collected, and that really weighs on you, then get a job somewhere else.
And I don't know if you're working at Meta or somewhere else, but the hand-wringing after you've accepted the job is just self-loathing. So, I don't know. Get over it and then spend a couple of years there. See if you like it. See if in fact it's weighing on your conscience. And also if you have the opportunity to do something that offers the same upside and economic security without the kind of emotional tax. But anyways, congrats on the position. You must be very talented.
That's all for this episode. If you'd like to submit a question, please email a voice recording to officehours.com. Again, that's officehours.com. Or if you prefer to ask on Reddit, just post your question on the Scott Galloway subreddit and we might feature it in an upcoming episode.
