Hey guys, welcome or welcome back to the channel McNoney, the official home of Power Mining Analysis. In today's episode, Anthony Power and I are pleased to welcome Jason Les back to the program. He's the CEO of Riot Platforms, and they just put out their Q1 earnings. We've got a lot to talk about in today's podcast. Before we get into it, take a second, hit the like button, you guys. Big help to myself and the channel. If you're not already subscribed, McNoney, feel free to join and let us know in the comments section below if you have any additional questions for Jason and team. If you're currently holding shares of Riot and your outlook for this company in 2025. Now, with that being said, let's get into today's interview.
Okay, guys. So, that's right. Today's video, we've got Jason Les back on the program, CEO of Riot Platforms, hot off the heels of Q1 earnings 2025. This is obviously a very pivotal quarter. Sets the pace and tone for the rest of the year. So, Jason, a lot to discuss on the list today. Thanks for making the time and glad to have you back.
Thank you for having me on, Bryce and Anthony. Looking forward to talking about all the things Riot's been up to. Should be good.
We were just having a little chuckle there. I said Bitcoin's made a nice little jump on the ticker, but Jason informed me he's out of batteries on that unit. So, Bitcoin still struggling a little bit. The miners have pulled back today, but that's okay. We've got a lot on the discussion board. First and foremost, can you give us kind of the high-level summary, key takeaways from last week's Q1 earnings call?
Yeah, Riot had a lot of really positive developments, good things in the first quarter. You know, of course, a big part of our strategy is our Bitcoin treasury strategy, whereas the mark-to-market of that Bitcoin value hits our financials every quarter. Obviously, Bitcoin has a tremendous amount of long-term value opportunity and we've seen a tremendous appreciation, but quarter-to-quarter, you know, there's volatility there and how that impacts our results. So, that was a big hit to our GAAP income. But at the same time important to highlight that Riot had record revenue for the quarter and that's despite network difficulty increasing substantially year-over-year. Riot achieved record revenue as a result of all the new hash rate that we've got online and more importantly how much more efficient that hash rate is now running thanks to all the work that our teams in the field has been doing. So seeing very good results on the mining operations side.
Aside from the financials, there's I think quite a few key milestones that we highlighted in our earnings report in our earnings release last week. This the acquisition and settlement of Rodium assets completely eliminates the third-party hosting element to Riot's business. Rodium was our last hosting customer in operation. That was a hosting agreement inherited from the acquisition of Windstone in 2021. We've been losing on average somewhere around $15 million a year if you annualize recent periods with that contract. So we are now able to eliminate that loss. We are getting all of Rodium's assets that we are evaluating how to repurpose for own use. We get the use of that power capacity that we're also taking a look at and eliminate those litigation expenses going forward. And then finally a lot of substantial progress on the AI/HPC front. You know, to put into perspective, it was just about, you know, three months ago, a little more than three months ago, that we commenced our feasibility study with Almanzor to evaluate how we could pursue AI/HPC opportunities for our Corsicana facility with the total of 1 gigawatt interconnection that's available there. We've made substantial progress building out our division to build this AI/HPC data center segment within Riot and do a bunch of things to make the site more attractive. The site is amazing as is. We think it has very high potential for data center customers, hyperscaler data center customers, but we've done a number of key things to enhance it just to make sure that we are positioned to get the best possible deal with the best possible counterparty. We are adding land to increase the overall campus size. We've been making progress adding water in there. We are doubling the amount of fiber routes that are available there. And all the while we're continuing the substation development to make sure that power is delivered on an aggressive timeline here. So, we're really excited about all of the things that we've accomplished in those three areas over the past quarter, but there's a bunch more in the works, and we think we're going to we're in a good position to continue to share positive milestones as we progress on all of these.
Yeah, it was as I say, there was some good points in the update there that the energy cost is still, you know, one of the lowest in the sector at the moment. So, that possibly gives you a good margin. I was pleased to see if we I mean we're going to come on to the operation report for April, but if you remember go back a year ago when we were probably asking you a few more challenging questions at that point in time about the operational updates and there was a gap between your hash rate and what your peers would in terms of Bitcoin and we've noticed now this last seven or eight months now where you've literally started that improvement process, you know, not so much long after after really after Corsicana came online but you've also sorted issues at the Rockdale facility that the updates now are where close to where we expect them to be, you know, month by month. And this year actually, I mean we when we talk operational updates, we tend to talk about Bitfarms and HIVE Digital because they've been consistently good over the last four years.
Two major things that we've accomplished, Anthony, to improve the metric that you're talking about, improving our operating efficiency. One, as you highlighted, coming online and being the dominant portion of our self-mining hash rate using new infrastructure design and new miners that has yielded, you know, fantastic operating results. And then there's been a lot of work as you highlighted done at Rockdale, getting once again refreshing the mining fleet there, making some tweaks here and there, and we have that facility in all air cooling, you know, might I add, running very smoothly now. So, it's been a quite a turnaround. You know, we talked, you know, many months ago when our operating results weren't as good in that area and I was on talking with you guys about operational excellence being a key and didn't mean that we were there right then, but it meant that that was the direction that we're aiming towards. We've showed substantial progress on that metric. We were averaging about 90%, just shy of 90% for the first quarter, utilization of hash rate. And by the way, that we're still impacted there when we're curtailing for power prices. So that's not solely just an operational uptime metric that accounts for when we have to curtail for power prices are high, which we are benefiting from as well. So substantial progress. We aren't resting on our laurels. We're continuing to find ways where we can drive incremental improvement. We've gotten to a good spot, but we aim to get better.
In terms of the April update, I mean, you know, we know there was a 7% increase in difficulty, so we expected the numbers to be less, and also the fact that April's one day less, you can add another 3% on for that. So when we look at the Bitcoin mined per day, you were effectively doing exactly what you did in the month of March. You were 10% down on that, but that's exactly where you expected to be. As I say, Bitcoin per EXAH, 15.8, that's the highest of the miners up to now. You obviously started to sell Bitcoin, which is obviously the change in the strategy. Are you able to elaborate a little bit on that decision there today?
Yeah. So one of the tenets of Riot's balance sheet that we've always talked about is one of the tenets of our strategy rather is to always have a very strong balance sheet. We think about that from a cash perspective, from a Bitcoin perspective, debt levels perspective, and then, you know, looking at all the options that we have available to us. That being said, we have ongoing needs for capital. We have to finance growth in our business. We have to finance ongoing operations and historically we used the ATM to do a lot of that. You'll note that we had very little ATM use in the first quarter. I believe we issued somewhere around 5 million shares at an average price of $13 a share. When the share price was lower, we just really did not want to run the ATM. So, we had to look at the different levers that, you know, we had to grow our business. And once again, we're very pleased about the advantageous position we put ourselves in where we're not only relying on one option. We have lots of tools we can work with to maintain the to get to achieve the lowest cost of capital without putting the business or its future value proposition at risk. During the first quarter or actually subsequent to quarter end, we rolled out our Coinbase facility and we're taking a very reasonable amount of leverage relative to how much Bitcoin that we had. We have a hundred million dollar facility open with Coinbase right now and that is out of, you know, nearly $2 billion of Bitcoin that we hold on our balance sheet. So very reasonable level of leverage. And then the other tool that we used, as you're asking about, Anthony, is we sold our monthly production in April. We sold just a little bit more just because we set up a sales plan to sell at the beginning of the month and then production ended up being slightly lower than that. You know, while we hate to sell Bitcoin because we think there's so much tremendous opportunity with Bitcoin and it's why our treasury strategy is such a core part of what we do at Riot, but that was the best option for us to minimize dilution while continuing to fund ongoing operations and growth of the business. It's something we look at on an ongoing basis. We do not have a dogmatic policy of we are always doing this, we're always doing that. We look at the options that we have in front of us. We look at our capital needs and we're evaluating this on an ongoing basis. So we may sell some of monthly production in the future. We may not. It's an ongoing decision.
Couple of just a couple of quick questions. One is obviously the critics out there be saying, 'Well, you bought Bitcoin in January. Now you're selling Bitcoin. You bought the Bitcoin at a higher price than what you're selling now. Is this a knee-jerk reaction?' And secondly, is we've just Bryce myself were just talking today about Bitcoin and about strategy and the fact that when you look at that company really that it's a small software company with this enormous balance of Bitcoin, they're given like literally a 2x yield on that on the Bitcoin that they hold on the balance sheet, you know, premium in terms of premium to 60 billion of Bitcoin. The company's valued at over a hundred billion and yet this is not replicated in the mining sector. And do you have any sort of like views as to why this is maybe being overlooked in this particular sector when you consider Marathon, yourselves and CleanSpark occupy three of the top five holdings of public companies of Bitcoin on the balance sheet?
Yeah. Well, I think Strategy, you know, formerly MicroStrategy has something that's very valuable and that is a track record of executing on this strategy. So, I think the market has a confidence in Michael Saylor and his team and their ability to deliver on that stated strategy. The market looks at miners a bit different. You know, while the Bitcoin treasury strategy is substantially all of their business, because of how big it's grown at this point, at other miners such as Riot, we have other parts of our business as well. So, you can't look at it as just the treasury strategy. There's multiple components that the market that investors are looking at. With respect to the first part of your question, Anthony, you know, we issued a convert to buy Bitcoin in December. I sold Bitcoin in April. These are two dramatically different time periods. You know, market conditions change. As a management team, we have to look at the playing field and make decisions based on what we believe are going to yield good long-term results, but also based on conditions on the ground today. So, we had a fantastic opportunity to take on long-term convertible debt at very reasonable terms in December and we utilized that to add a significant amount of Bitcoin to our balance sheet. In April, market conditions were not great for our share price. So, to fund ongoing operations and growth, we utilize the best tool we had in front of us. And in that case, it was selling monthly production, selling some of our Bitcoin. So, it's important I believe for management teams to remain flexible. We have our long-term goals, but we have to make the decisions that are going to bring in capital at the lowest cost of capital price while not putting the business at too much risk.
Yeah, appreciate the transparency there, Jason. And management flexibility was actually one thing we heard on our panel in Fort Lauderdale from the Wall Street experts as well in this space. Very dynamic sector, a lot of volatility, things change quickly and obviously strategies have to be updated accordingly. So appreciate the context there. Wanted to hit on a couple of those main points you talked about in earnings there specifically revenue. Then we'll get into Rodium and of course the Almanzor study as well. So in terms of revenue, you made reference to record revenue $161.4 million. That's up from 79.3 year-over-year Q1 versus Q1. Can you talk to us about where you were finding success, how you were able to navigate like you mentioned the halving, the difficulty increases and still put up that huge number?
Yeah, so first, you know, of course the Bitcoin price is up comparatively to those two periods. So that helped with us helps us as well. Offsetting that is the halving and the network difficulty. So major headwinds and tailwinds impacting results quite a bit. But what we can control is our operations. Riot has I believe over tripled our operating hash rate comparing Q1 2024 to Q1 2025. So we've got significant amount more hash rate online and deployed and we are operating that hash rate better. That is really what helped drive that significant improvement in results comparing the quarters of 25 and 24. Also our engineering segment is starting to ramp up. You're seeing that in the results. We completed the acquisition of E4A Solutions which tucks into our engineering segment. We completed that acquisition in December. That adds a new service line and capability to our engineering segment. Also, you know, ESS Metron on the manufacturing side has been starting new contracts that are better than those large government contract that we had in the past that took up a lot of space, time, and not great margins. That business is able to take on higher margin contracts now and we're seeing better results from that. Really, I think what we've accomplished operationally that has driven more than anything the improved results in revenue year-over-year and we're going to continue making strides on this front.
Now, in terms of the Rodium settlement, I know that was a big press release we covered on the channel as well. This one, talk about legacy contracts. You had mentioned the last of the hosting contracts that you guys inherited opens up 125 megawatts worth of additional capacity. We were wondering if you could give us a bit of an update on the plan for that. If we may see an increase to that hash rate guidance and what type of machines or fleet efficiency you're getting out of that settlement, Jason.
So with the acquisition of Rodium, we acquired the tangible assets that they've had at Rockdale and we acquired of course the buildings that those miners are operating in. We ended those hosting agreements that had 125 megawatts of capacity to them. And if you look in our earnings deck, we have a slide that shows what capacity Rodium was occupying, all of Building C at Rockdale and a good portion of Building B at Rockdale as well. C being immersion, B being air cooled. What we're doing right now with our operations team is going through everything they have and determining what we want to keep running and how we want to keep running that. That gives the upside for our hash rate in the future. We don't know exactly what that's going to be yet. The machine mix is a mix of some latest generation equipment and there's some mid-generation and maybe slightly older generation equipment in there as well. So it's kind of an inventory and testing and evaluation process right now. And then after our teams have time to go through that and we decide, you know, what we want to operate from that in an ongoing basis, we can update our hash rate guidance accordingly, our deployed hash rate figure. But additionally that power capacity brings other opportunities. As I touched on earlier, we're focused on building out our data center business segment. So having more power capacity at Rockdale available gives us more potential to do data center deals there as well. I think Corsicana is still the best natural first step because of, you know, a variety of reasons and attributes we can talk about later, but having additional power capacity brings more value opportunities to the table. So all around we're excited about this transaction. We're excited to get the additional assets. We're excited to eliminate this problem that has, you know, costed us and been a strain on our financials historically.
Clears up the path a little, clears up the picture. Rockdale now 100% Riot, self-owned and operated. In terms of that PPA agreement at Rockdale, with your Riot mining position there at the moment, do you have any capacity to take on any of the additional hash rate from Rodium within that PPA or would you have to use effectively similar to Corsicana, market rate to use additional power? And second part of that is you've highlighted a point there that maybe you could utilize power for delivering your HPC strategy at Rockdale as well as the Corsicana site. So it gives you another site to consider. How much, in sort of like broad terms, how much excess power do you have at Rockdale taking into account what you're utilizing for mining and maybe utilizing for mining now that you've got the Rodium 125 megawatts back in play?
So with your first question on the power price. So the power price at Rockdale is determined by, you know, a number of factors. We have our hedge price. We're buying some power at spot and then we're doing things with our power strategy trading power. All of that results in a facility-wide power price. It's not really chopped up from one part of the facility or the other. With Rodium there was an agreement to deliver power to them or charge them a certain rate for power that was very low and so the loss that you would see in our financials was basically the spread between what it would take us to acquire power and then what they were being charged for power. So what we have is a 700 megawatt substation total capacity that's been built out there. So there is additional capacity that can be used, you know, depending on how much of Rodium's hash rate we end up using, you know, that will impact what the total amount of available power at Rockdale is. So we think this also presents an opportunity for potential AI HPC data center deals. The Dallas market is more attractive. We have a pad ready to go with land cleared for first stage development at Corsicana. So we think that is going to be a tenant's likely preference for a first deal, but we're very open to opportunities at Rockdale. We are also working to enhance the offering at Rockdale to make it appealing to hyperscale AI HPC customers. So we'll just have to stay tuned and see what happens.
Yeah, that's great. There was a number of really interesting slides in the investor presentation. I'll make sure we put them up on screen as we go through these, Jason. But you had one about Riot's cost per coin projections in 2025 talking about direct costs and direct costs with power. In addition to that, talking about Bitcoin yield as one of your key four focuses in 2025. And I picked up on this. This is a unique term. I haven't seen it a lot in the Riot decks before, but talking about that larger picture Bitcoin strategy, Bitcoin balance sheet, Bitcoin yield. Can you talk to us about how these two are related? Acquiring Bitcoin through yourself mining and then this Bitcoin yield focal point, I guess.
Yeah, so in our earnings deck, we had a slide highlighting what our cost to mine was for Q1 2025. Our all-in direct cost to mine was $43,888 per coin. Large amount of that is power. We've continued to demonstrate economies of scale as we've scaled up our operations. The non-power portion of that all-in cost has been getting smaller. That's a trend that started in Q3 2024, continued in Q4 and now we report even more improvement there in Q1 2025. So, we're very pleased about that. What the go-forward all-in cost per coin? You know, obviously that's going to be dependent on power prices. That's going to be dependent on how network difficulty goes. But Riot has continued to demonstrate one of the best power prices in the industry because of our proprietary power strategy and the know-how and capability we built around that. So very confident Riot is always going to be very competitive on that standpoint. On your question on Bitcoin yield, so obviously Riot takes no credit for this. This was coined by Michael Saylor as a metric that measures the increase in Bitcoin per fully diluted share year-over-year. So for 2024, Riot had a Bitcoin yield for the year of 39%. That means one share of Riot at the end of 2024 had 39% more Bitcoin underlying it than it did at the start of the year. For Q1 2025, we reported a Bitcoin yield year-to-date of just around 7%. This metric is important because it drives a bunch of key operating metrics together. One, Bitcoin production or however we're adding Bitcoin to our balance sheet that is going to enhance Bitcoin yield. The lower the cost that we have to do that is going to enhance Bitcoin yield. So if we're low-cost efficient operators, we are able to do that more efficiently. And then finally, it drives discipline around dilution. While adding Bitcoin to your balance sheet will enhance Bitcoin yield, issuing more shares is going to decrease Bitcoin yield. So it really makes us think about what is the most shareholder-friendly, what is the most accretive way for shareholders that we can increase our Bitcoin on our balance sheet. I think it helps hold us to very accountable. It helps us think about all elements of the business. While there's volatility to that number as well, you know, it won't always necessarily go up quarter over quarter over longer time periods. If we are successful at what we're doing, if we're executing well, then we should continue to be able to show an increase of Bitcoin per share over time. And as Bitcoin appreciates in value, shareholders benefit from that.
Moving on to the Corsicana and obviously we when we went to do the visit there you showed us around the types of immersion cooling technology using and also the fact that MicroBT were actually preparing machines ready for immersion cooling which was something that other suppliers weren't doing in terms of those machines that you received obviously early last year when Corsicana went live. What sort of plans are you having in place for I mean we're seeing a massive increase in efficiency of miners coming onto the market now. We've got Bitmain trying to achieve significantly low efficiency. You've got Bitdeer also having plans to get down to single digit efficiency maybe towards the end of this year early next year. What are the sort of things that MicroBT because obviously your preferred provider at the moment are they bringing out newer models and actually in terms of what you're trying to utilize in the mining space are you looking to plan any upgrades at your facilities in the near future with new machines?
Well, I can't speak to what MicroBT's plans are. You'd have to ask them themselves, but they are continuing to show improvements multiple times a year in their machine offerings. So, I'm really impressed of what they've done and I have a lot of confidence in MicroBT to continue delivering industry-leading equipment. As far as what Riot needs from that with our operations at Corsicana, I think Anthony, you're asking we need to refresh our fleet as miners get more efficient. At the end of the day, what we're trying to accomplish is a low direct cost per coin. And if you look at just the power side of that, that is going to be driven by your machine efficiency and also your cost of power. So if you are a low power cost producer, you are not going to be as sensitive to what the machine efficiency is in delivering a strong margin. So because Riot is so strong on the power side, we don't have the same pressure to always need to have the latest generation equipment and be refreshing miners very quickly in order to maintain a healthy margin. So because a lot of these machines are, you know, most of the machines are at most one year old, I think it's way too early to think about...
machine refreshment there. We have a competitive fleet. Our all-in fleet efficiency is 21 joules per terahash right now. With our cost of power, we're still showing a very, very competitive all-in cost per mine. Like we talked about, our power cost to mine in the first quarter was $35,313 per coin. And I think we're in a really good spot. So, long ways off, I believe, from having to look at machine refreshment at Corsicana.
In terms of, you've been with Riot now for I think maybe seven years. You've obviously spent a lot of that time using technology that isn't immersion cooling, and we've yet to sort of really get any data from any of the miners regarding immersion cooling. Can you talk about how the miners are performing at Corsicana compared to say similar efficient miners using air-cooled, and are you seeing a benefit in terms of less maintenance required on those mining machines in immersion cooling? Can you talk about that type of comparison because we don't have any sort of data to fall back on and look into from that perspective.
So first to level set, both air cooling and immersion cooling and hydro cooling, they all make sense. They all have their pros and cons. We did not build immersion at Rockdale, I'm sorry, at Corsicana because we think that's the only way to build. That is what made sense in that buildout. One of the advantages of immersion is you can achieve better density. We can get more hash rate, more power used in a smaller land footprint. And that was important with the land profile that we were looking at at Corsicana. Other advantages to immersion are the stable temperatures that machines will operate at. And what we've seen so far is that requires less maintenance, less repairs. Machines are operating in a more stable environment. So that's fantastic. Immersion though does have a higher upfront cost. The infrastructure is more expensive than air cooling. However, we believe that will ultimately be offset by the extra lifespan that these machines will get. Because the immersion miners that we're using at Corsicana are purpose-built for immersion. It's been a very smooth operating experience. Historically, when we did immersion at, for example, Rockdale, we were taking air-cooled miners and doing work to them to convert them to make them work in immersion. That's a lot of extra steps and complexity and man-hours and surface area for problems, and eliminating that has been a huge gain. So, we're very pleased with the immersion operations at Corsicana. The new immersion tanks we're using are running very well. The miners are a huge improvement over the past and we're very pleased with that. At the same time at Rockdale, we've also put in new air-cooled miners from MicroBT at Rockdale over the past 12 months. We're also seeing fantastic results there. We're seeing real excellent uptime even during the highest temperatures throughout the year in Texas. So, both make sense. Both have pros and cons. We're really happy with the design decisions that we've made and it'll be good to get out there again with you guys and show you what it looks like all operating. I think the last time you were there it was a little earlier in construction and deployment of miners. So it's quite a sight to see now.
Yeah. The reason I sort of asked that question, Jason, not so much about immersion cooling, but really the day before we came to Corsicana last year, we were at another facility where it was an air-cooled facility and I came away from that facility thinking it shouldn't be underestimated how much maintenance is required at large mining facilities. I think we were sort of halfway through the year and they'd had like 11,000 work orders. And so on a site that small, and Corsicana, you know, from that perspective, maybe with an older generation of miner than maybe what you've got at the moment at Corsicana, but I was trying to sort of get that perspective. Are you seeing, it sounds like you're seeing much better technology and less maintenance, less service requirement than you had maybe on some of the older machines at Rockdale, for instance, because on the air-cooled side there you're seeing that sort of better performance. And yes, obviously we know that the cost at the start of this is significant, but we've seen a lot of miners now thinking, you know what, immersion cooling looks to be the way forward and we might see more and more miners staying or starting to switch to that technology in the future.