Asher, welcome to the show.
How's it going, guys? How you doing?
Pretty good, man. Thank you for joining. Obviously, super busy couple of weeks for you coming fresh off of Q2 earnings this week. We really appreciate you taking the time.
Of course. And I would love to start with a question that you've probably gotten a hundred times this week and was a feature of most of the calls this week for the cohort of Bitcoin miners turned AI companies, and that's explicitly: how does the new audit from Greg Abbott and the delay to Batch Zero affect Hut 8 specifically as it relates to the Beacon Point data center?
Overall, what I think Greg Abbott has done is extremely good for the ecosystem, and you actually saw even QTS came out and supported him. We need more people to give kind of local voters, constituents, community members comfort that data centers are not this big scary thing that's going to come and take everyone's water and increase energy bills and so forth. I think what we're seeing a lot across the country is that this misinformation has spread and really gotten into people's heads, and for a data center developer it's harder to get there and say, 'Hey, look, we don't do these things,' because they think, 'Okay, well, you are biased in saying that because you're trying to invest into this project and obviously you're going to say the data centers are fine and not going to consume water and so forth.' So, I actually think what Governor Abbott did was extremely smart because there's so much investment in data centers going into Texas and it's better to get ahead of this and say we're going to make sure that this investment is done in a responsible way that helps build communities rather than let the fear become so large that it's hard to reverse later. And so, like, we're extremely supportive of the initiative.
And also, we were one of the few that actually responded to the PUC in their questionnaire that related to a lot of these topics. And frankly, that questionnaire was many of the same things that Governor Abbott and his office released. And so overall, we're going to work through the process, but think this is good and healthy for the ecosystem because he also didn't take an extreme approach like New York, where they said, 'All right, we're going to do a moratorium, no more data centers.' He said, 'We're going to do an audit process to make sure that these investments are good for the communities and don't have a negative impact.' And I think that's great.
This is kind of off the cuff for me, but going back to the PUC survey, if I recall correctly, it was like 26 companies out of over 100 that actually ended up, or projects that actually ended up responding.
300. Yeah. Thank you, Charlie. And I think that underscores what Brandon was talking about earlier about the fact that what this is really about is chasing phantom load out of the equation. It's like if you're not serious about building, you need to just get out of the queue and then let the people who actually have their ducks in a row kind of tackle this. So, just to dig in on that one just a little bit more though, Asher, as I understand it, the second phase of Beacon Point already has the agreement with AP Texas. Correct?
Correct. We already have an interconnection agreement in place. So, and it seems from what we've seen from Morgan Stanley that there's a high chance—and I'm not going to try to get you to say this with certainty, I understand that—but there's a high chance that Hut 8 will be considered base load for this Batch Zero and that it should smooth over the process. So, you're generally confident about Hut 8's prospects, I would assume, going in even to this audit and into the extension of the Batch Zero.
Yeah, before the extension happened, obviously today was when they were supposed to release it, was when we felt very confident and such. And I think at the end of the day, like, the criteria doesn't change, right? The amount of developments doesn't change. And I think all of the questions that Governor Abbott had asked in his audit are things that we've already answered publicly through the PUC survey. And so we think that this is net positive, and it's not helpful, obviously creating some volatility into the ecosystem, volatility into the Hut stock today, but overall, like, we are proud of the projects that we're building because, like, I'll give you an example, and I spoke about this to our team the other day. Our first site that we ever built back in the Bitcoin days was a former DuPont sodium smelter that was a brownfield site that we retrofitted because it had a 50-megawatt substation into a Bitcoin data center. And when we were building that site, the subcontractors that were there were talking about how important that factory was for their parents and their grandparents. And it was like it was a central part of the community, right? It helped employ a lot of folks. People thought fondly of the factory. And I think data centers should have that similar impact on communities they go into, whether it be by the folks they employ, whether it be by the technologies that they can teach people, right? We're looking at different things where we can work with local schools and teach them on the technologies, the infrastructure stack and so forth, or the different community projects that they invest into. And so overall, like, there's too much negative sentiment on data centers out there. And I think what I've heard through kind of some folks is some of that is driven by foreign adversaries, some of that is driven by different kind of stakeholder groups. But at the end of the day, what should come out is the truth versus what's real and what's not. And any process that helps verify what's real and what's not, I think, should be welcomed because it's hard to fight against things that are not real. It's much easier to just say, you know what, these things we don't do. We do not consume water because we have a closed-loop water system. We pay for energy infrastructure outputs and our supply. We're not driving price up. We're actually helping the grid by increasing infrastructure, right? We don't have big noise concerns because we've run all the noise and traffic studies. All of these things a responsible developer should do, and that's how we're going to allow us to go and compete against other countries in this AI race. But like, we've got to get ahead of this, otherwise we're going to just be dealing with all of this FUD that is going to be hard to actually develop responsibly.
Yeah, that's a good point. I think with regards to making sure that the process is buttoned up so that we can address some of these concerns that oftentimes are overblown in the media and in the cultural conscience. On the note of expansion, Asher, Hut 8's got 5.4 gigawatts under due diligence, 11 sites across six states. Can you provide any insight into where y'all are at with the timeline for some of these? And specifically, can you give us an update on Batavia, Illinois, and what y'all are thinking in terms of prioritizing these sites going forward?
Sure. We have sites across the whole US today. We have, I think, over 10 different states that we're operating within and looking at different projects within those sites range from end of '27, '28, '29, and some in 2030. That kind of, and some of the sites ramp up per year as well. And so, it's a whole slew. You'll see that number continue to increase. We are spending heavy investment on growing that pipeline. That pipeline does not include all of the M&A opportunities that we're exploring right now as well. We have a whole team that explores those opportunities or behind-the-meter generation opportunities where we can bring generation and power where there's a lot of opportunities there as well. And Batavia is a relatively small site of ours, it's 50 megawatts right outside of Chicago. That site is going through a restudy process with ComEd now, and when it goes through that process, there's ample demand there, but it's a relatively small project in our whole portfolio.
A quick question on the development pipeline, Asher, and if I'm misunderstanding something, please correct me here, but it seems like the Fluidstack right of first offer on the 1 gigawatt expansion at Riverbend is excluded from the stated development pipeline.
That's right. We don't include expansion at Riverbend today.
Okay. What could you give us an update on what the timeline for that decision is, and if Fluidstack passes, will that capacity be earmarked for a new tenant? Does it revert to the general development pipeline? Like, what's the process there for getting that moved through to a deal?
Sure. We have interesting timelines that the utility has provided, and then we have some other kind of go-fast solutions on behind-the-meter generation on that campus as well, and we have multiple folks that are interested in that capacity, whether the roof is executed or not.
Thanks for the update on that.
A few questions on financing here, Asher. So, with the Cathedra convertible note converted to equity in May, there's no general recourse debt now sitting at the parent level. So, I'm just curious if that is the strategy going forward, if Hut 8 will continue to try to pursue deals where there is no recourse at the parent level, and if we should expect investment-grade notes like the ones we've seen for Beacon Point and Riverbend to kind of become the standard for the financing stack going forward because y'all closed like, what, $7.5 billion in these deals throughout the quarter. Is that the template we should expect, or are there other avenues for fundraising that Hut 8 would, you know, look at in the future for these builds?
So today we have zero debt at the Hut parent level, as you had mentioned, and that was done very purposefully. And also, the financings that we did at the project level are all 16.5-year investment-grade bonds. So there's no refinancing obligation. A lot of the construction loans that you see, once you build it, you have to go refinance in the market and you have to raise capital to pay off the loan and then have a longer-term loan that you put in place. I think the reason why we've done both of those things is the markets are volatile, as we see today, right? It's down 22% this week because of some letter that was posted that we actually think is good for the market. And so as a result, like, the market is volatile and we've lived through that volatility, especially in the Bitcoin world. And what we've learned is it's actually really good to be in a place of strength when the markets are not strong. And so having a really strong balance sheet and having no refinancing needs allow us actually to be a buyer in markets where things are cheap because I think when things are good, I think that's when you bolster the balance sheet, and when things are bad, that's when you deploy. And so that's how we think about strategy and how we think about growth for the company.