CEOInterviews.AI
Start App
Sam Harris
Neuroscientist, philosopher, author and podcast host, Making Sense

Is Elon Musk a Con Man?

📅 Oct 09, 2026 Sam Harris 24 MIN 223724 VIEWS 39 SEGMENTS · 2 SPEAKERS
Sam Harris speaks with Alex Gibney about his new documentary, Musk. They discuss Sam’s former friendship with Musk, the line between visionary and con man, the myth of Tesla’s founding, the staged self-driving video, Musk’s lurch to the right, DOGE and the dismantling of USAID, his feud and reconciliation with Trump, Starlink and the war in Ukraine, the case for future investigations, and other topics. Alex Gibney is an Academy Award-winning documentary filmmaker and the founder and president of Jigsaw Productions. His films include Taxi to the Dark Side, Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room,...

What Sam Harris said

Written from the verified transcript and checked against it. Every figure links to the moment it was said.

Sam Harris interviews Alex Gibney about his documentary 'Musk'. Harris notes he was once friends with Musk and initially thought Twitter and fame had deranged him, but the film's footage showed him as a bully and narcissist. Gibney explains he started the project intrigued by Musk as a maverick inventor but ended up seeing him as a con man, though not a fraud like Elizabeth Holmes. Gibney details how Musk was not a founder of Tesla, forced Martin Eberhard to falsely call him one in a lawsuit settlement, and ran a battery swap demonstration only to secure a California subsidy. Harris acknowledges Musk's real achievements, like transforming the electric car industry and launching more satellites than the rest of humanity combined, but questions the line between optimism and fraud, especially on self-driving claims. Gibney also notes many people were too scared to appear on camera, fearing lawsuits or professional repercussions.

Key takeaways

  1. Musk was not a founder of Tesla; he forced Martin Eberhard to falsely call him one in a lawsuit settlement.
  2. Musk's battery swap demonstration was a con to secure a California subsidy, not a real product.
  3. Many people close to Musk were too terrified to appear in the documentary, fearing lawsuits or professional repercussions.
  4. Gibney acknowledges Musk's real achievements, including transforming the electric car industry and launching more satellites than the rest of humanity combined.
  5. Harris initially thought Twitter and fame had deranged Musk, but the film's footage showed him as a bully and narcissist.

Numbers and commitments

FigureWhat it refers toTypeAt
500-600 page Length of Walter Isaacson's biography of Musk metric 2:57

Chapters

  1. 0:00Introduction to the documentary
  2. 5:28Musk's public persona vs. private self
  3. 7:14Challenges in making the film
  4. 12:00Musk as a con man vs. industrialist
  5. 16:56Tesla's founding and battery swap con
  6. 22:46Self-driving claims and fraudulence

Questions asked in this interview

5
  1. 3:55And it was interesting the debate that we had always about Elon was, did he change in some radical way or did a part of his personality simply become more exaggerated?
  2. 9:00And then, you know, I faced a bigger problem, which is how do you get to the heart of a portrait of a person without the central person participating?
  3. 11:23Why wouldn't you stick up for your friend by telling me how great he was?
  4. 19:46And you know, we can all agree that the first question that anybody asks you if you drive an electric car, and I do drive one, it's not a Tesla, it's a Polestar, but you know, the first question people ask me is what's the range?
  5. 20:51It's like, what's this all about?
Alex Gibney 0:00 ↗
Elon Musk is not the founder of Tesla. The founder of Tesla was a guy named Martin Eberhart and his partner Mark Tarponing. And in a lawsuit where Martin tried to claw back what he felt he was owed, Elon would only agree to settle the lawsuit when Martin agreed to say that Elon was what he wasn't, which was a founder of Tesla. It starts the mythologizing that Elon Musk is not an investor, he's an inventor.
Sam Harris 0:25 ↗
I am here with Alex Gibney. Alex, great to see you again.
Alex Gibney 0:28 ↗
Good to see you, Sam.
Sam Harris 0:30 ↗
I've turned the tables on you. Last time you were talking to me, now I'm talking to you.
Alex Gibney 0:34 ↗
Yeah, it's your turn.
Sam Harris 0:36 ↗
Well, so we're going to talk about that project. You have this new documentary on Elon Musk titled Musk, which at the time we release this will be out in theaters everywhere, and then eventually on HBO.
I got to think my audience is pretty deeply familiar with your work. You are on the very short, maybe two or three fingered list of the most famous documentarians in America at this point. You made Going Clear about Scientology, The Inventor about Elizabeth Holmes, the Armstrong lie about Lance Armstrong, Enron, the Smartest Guys in the Room about Enron, that debacle. Yeah, you made many other films, but the ones I just mentioned really focus on some very selfish and deluded people creating a fair amount of harm. And that is a theme in your...
Alex Gibney 1:28 ↗
Current segue. Yeah, sounds like a segue.
Sam Harris 1:32 ↗
So I've seen the film. You sent me a link to a screener and it's four hours long. It's really great and I can tell you about my experience watching it in a minute, but I have to think it was hard to cut down even to that length and I'm wondering why you didn't decide to do a 10-part series or a format like that which would have given you even more time.
Alex Gibney 2:00 ↗
It's a good question. I mean, ultimately, I think we decided that for all sorts of reasons that we'd explore a theatrical release, a kind of immersion in a theater. That's the way it was originally planned. And actually, I had a version of the film in the spring of 2024 that was virtually done, a two-hour version we were going to release for the fall festivals. But then Trump was nearly assassinated. Elon Musk hitched his wagon to Trump and my pals at HBO said, "You're not done. Keep going." And so, it reminded me a little bit of a comment that's in the longer version of the film that Elon Musk said. They say, if you're going through hell, keep going. So, I kept going.
Sam Harris 2:57 ↗
Well, yeah. So that's a very interesting starting point because you started this film really kind of back in the time where it's somewhat analogous to Walter Isaacson's biography, right? I mean, he wrote this 500-600 page essentially hagiography of Elon which predates virtually all of the controversy of him lurching into right-wing politics and his misadventures on Twitter. And so things just started to get interesting after you had in some sense finished your film. Obviously you don't totally align with Isaacson's effort. I mean, you were covering the Twitter stuff from the beginning, but what was your perception of Elon when you started the project and how did that change? I mean, are there really two different Alex Gibneys associated with this project?
Alex Gibney 3:55 ↗
Well, there is a place where I started and there is a place where I ended up. I wouldn't say they're two different Alex Gibneys. And it was interesting the debate that we had always about Elon was, did he change in some radical way or did a part of his personality simply become more exaggerated? It was a debate we were constantly having because when I entered the story, you know, I owned a Tesla Powerwall at home. I had Tesla solar panels on my house and I found him to be a kind of intriguing sort of maverick inventor. Now, he was starting to go off the rails, you know, prior to this project starting. You know, there was thepedo guy episode with the diver who's trying to rescue the Thai cave kids and Twitter. Well, Twitter hadn't really happened yet. That was 2023. So, I was intrigued by him. And when I was approached to do a doc about him, I wasn't sure actually I really wanted to do it. But a friend of mine said, "No, no, no. You should do it. It's about 21st century power." And he was accreting a lot of power even then. He was at the time the richest man in the world. So I dug in and in part because he had a similarity to some of the characters that I had looked at in the past. And so I just thought I'd start and see where the journey took me. I didn't really think it was going to take me here, but it did.
Sam Harris 5:28 ↗
So, yeah, I mean, I found the experience watching it a little disorienting because you cover all of the years of his public life really and some considerable portion of that period I was friends with him. But I wasn't, and I should say, if I haven't already, that you interviewed me for the film and so I'm in there to some extent. And I think when you interviewed me at the time, I was more on the side of thinking that Twitter and his engagement with his own algorithm and kind of growing fame and wealth and power had deranged him more than revealed him, right? Because I find this guy unrecognizable. But in watching your film, so much of the footage is contemporaneous with my friendship with him and I realized I wasn't watching most of his press coverage at all. I mean, so I was having a private experience with the guy, but I wasn't seeing so much how he was showing up in public. And I certainly didn't see him in all of his roles in life, right? So I was not seeing him as a bully and a narcissist and a fame and power seeking monster of any kind really. And yet some of that evidence was available had I been watching the footage that is in your film. And I want to go into, I mean, I certainly want to be as fair as we can be to Elon here. And I want to explore whether you're as fair as you should be in your film.
Alex Gibney 7:14 ↗
Sure.
Sam Harris 7:14 ↗
But before we dive into it, what's been the experience of making the film and releasing the film and dealing with any pushback from Elon? Has this been a kind of a standard documentarian's story or has this been an unusual experience for you?
Alex Gibney 7:38 ↗
Well, it's been both unusual and to some extent par for the course. I mean, there are a lot of films I started where I didn't have access to the central subject even though they were the central subject. Elizabeth Holmes never sat down for an interview with me. I found a workaround in that case. You know, in the case of Lance Armstrong and Eliot Spitzer, I spent a lot of time with them. The Enron guys never sat down with me, though I did get some high-ranking Enron executives, so that aspect was always a little, you never exactly know how it's going to work out. I had some exchanges with Julian Assange, but he never agreed to a sit-down interview. The thing that was odd about this one was, you know, there was a producer on my team, Jesse Deere, who had worked on two docs with Elon. And so we had an actual entree to him, and Jesse wrote him a number of letters, you know, that were convivial and urged him. But his exchange with me was very frontal and it was, you know, I mean it's chronicled in the film, but basically, I mean he went out on Twitter, his response to our intreaties was to go on Twitter and say, "Gibney is a douche."
Sam Harris 8:55 ↗
And this was just at the first mention that you were making the film in the first place, the first time?
Alex Gibney 9:00 ↗
Not exactly. There had been an earlier mention of it where he said it was a hit piece, but this was a second mention I think accompanied by our invitation because of course I wanted him to be interviewed. That was my initial instinct. So yeah, but it was early and I was guessing at that point that I probably wasn't going to get the interview with Elon that I had hoped for. So I just tweeted back, "douche," and that was the end of our exchange. And then, you know, I faced a bigger problem, which is how do you get to the heart of a portrait of a person without the central person participating? But I had been there before so I just had to go through the process and see how it, go through the journey and see how it turned out.
Sam Harris 9:49 ↗
Were there people who had a lot to say but weren't willing to go on camera to say those things?
Alex Gibney 9:56 ↗
Yes. And a lot of them either were close to Elon and didn't get his permission, or there were people who knew Elon reasonably well from a workplace standpoint. Some were inclined toward him, some weren't. But they were all terrified of appearing on screen because they were afraid that Elon might sue them or there would be other professional repercussions. And I think also among the higher echelons of either Silicon Valley investors or executives, you know, there's kind of a club. You don't speak out against other people. The one exception to that rule appears in the film, Reid Hoffman. But there was kind of like, "I'll talk to you off the record or on background." And some of that conversation was useful, but I found it particularly for the men who always like to be big swaggering characters in real life or in public life, you know, when it came to appearing on this documentary, shriveled into the shadows.

19 more exchanges in this transcript

Sign in free to read the rest of this interview. No card required.

Sign in to read the full transcript

Cite this transcript

APA, MLA, BibTeX
APA

Harris, S. (2026, October 9). Is Elon Musk a Con Man? [Interview transcript]. Sam Harris. CEOInterviews.AI. https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/3095362/

MLA

Sam Harris. "Is Elon Musk a Con Man?." Sam Harris, 9 Oct. 2026. Transcript, CEOInterviews.AI, https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/3095362/.

BibTeX
@misc{harris2026_3095362,
  author       = {Sam Harris},
  title        = {Is Elon Musk a Con Man?},
  howpublished = {Interview transcript, Sam Harris. CEOInterviews.AI},
  year         = {2026},
  month        = {oct},
  url          = {https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/3095362/},
  note         = {Speaker-attributed transcript with timestamps}
}