CEOInterviews.AI
Start App
Christina Cacioppo
Co-founder & CEO, Vanta

Compliance Is Your Competitive Advantage — Christina Cacioppo, Vanta | Enterprise Ready Conf 2024

📅 Oct 21, 2025 WorkOS 40 MIN 312 VIEWS 55 SEGMENTS · 3 SPEAKERS
At WorkOS Enterprise Ready Conf, Christina Cacioppo, CEO of Vanta, shares how startups evolve from scrappy to enterprise-ready — without slowing down. This fireside chat, with WorkOS Founder and CEO Michael Grinich, explores compliance as leverage, scaling customer trust, and the mindset shift every developer-led team needs.

Questions asked in this interview

12
  1. 0:23And he said, "You know who you should meet is Christina, and we just used their product to get SOC 2 compliant." And I was like, "SOC what?" Now you're here thousands of customers later. How's it going?
  2. 5:38How did you approach those conversations?
  3. 7:45Was it a point in time?
  4. 10:58Now, it used to just be a big company thing. What happened?
  5. 16:36The competitive market, how do you feel about that?
  6. 21:00What else have you guys built?
  7. 23:55And what have you seen in that life cycle from the smaller companies you serve all the way through the largest ones?
  8. 25:13Can you say more about that?
  9. 26:17How does it fit into your work?
  10. 28:43How many employees are you right now?
  11. 32:15Like they're, you know, they're looking at you like as a startup, you know, how do they, how do you convince them to make that bet?
  12. 37:36How many do you have now? How many integrations?
Interviewer 0:00 ↗
Let's go.
Christina Cacioppo 0:11 ↗
Great to see you. Thanks for having me.
Interviewer 0:13 ↗
So, about six years ago, I was having lunch like three blocks down the street here with this guy named Ivan.
Christina Cacioppo 0:22 ↗
I was going to say, yeah. Yeah.
Interviewer 0:23 ↗
And Ivan had about 10 or 12 people working on this app called Notion in his office. And I hung out with Ivan and I was asking him about how they were thinking about enterprise, how they were going after it. And he said, "You know who you should meet is Christina, and we just used their product to get SOC 2 compliant." And I was like, "SOC what?" Now you're here thousands of customers later. How's it going?
Christina Cacioppo 0:50 ↗
It doesn't get easier. You just go faster. It is always hard.
Interviewer 0:54 ↗
All right. Well, let's talk about the very beginning stage because I think this for a lot of people that are thinking about starting companies or wondering like where the market is going, it's kind of the most interesting bit. Vanta has a pretty interesting founding story when you were trying to think about what to build in these early days. You didn't come from a traditional security background. You weren't a CIO at some company, and yet you found your way into this area of data compliance and enterprise readiness. Take us back. Tell us that story.
Christina Cacioppo 1:20 ↗
Yeah. So there's like I think all good founding stories, there's two versions of it, both true, and you tell them kind of in different measures. The first version, which is true, was I was a product manager at Dropbox trying to launch what at the time was a new product, Dropbox Paper. So like Dropbox's version of Notion, but it's worse. About that time, too. Anyway, and ran into the product because it was separate from the rest of Dropbox, had none of the security or GRC functionality or like platform teams from the rest of Dropbox, and I was told on the eve of launch like you can't launch because you don't have SOC 2. And I learned what it took and like literally ran screaming from the room. Like sometimes they tell the story as like and then I was brilliant and I decided to found. That's not what happened. I was like, this is insane. You're telling me like this is Dropbox in 2016, height of its power. I have to give up the like 15-person engineering team for a year before I can tell if I have product-market fit. That seems like a bad trade-off. Anyway, I do think though that was like an important part of the story because there was like a little bit of prepared mind. Like that's when I learned what like SOC, that was my like SOC what moment.
And then having left Dropbox soon a year after that or so, and really for kind of just like reasons I can't explain, like naive reasons, wanted to start a security company. Seemed really interesting. Seemed like something I wanted to learn about. Was like, look, if this doesn't work, but I spend you know 5 to 10 years learning about security, like I mean I'll be sad, but actually that's like not the worst outcome. I'll have at least learned a ton about something I care about and think is important. Hopefully it works. And so went around and talked to startups about security and generally found that while many people, it's easy to say startups don't care. I think they care. It was just really hard to prioritize because again like back to the Dropbox Paper thing, when you don't have any customers, it is very hard to be worried about losing their data. And in fact your biggest concern is not oh when I get customers how shall I secure their data. Your concern is how the heck do I get customers?
Right. And that was kind of dismal for a while. So there was like the wandering and the wilderness phase of founding a startup, and then found one company actually, the you know big company that was tiny at the time. It's a 35-person company in SoMa called Figma, which you may have heard of. And I walked in, I was talking to their head of infrastructure at the time, this guy Matthew. And I had my list of research questions, which is like, you know, how do you secure your cloud environment? And like, how do you think about employee endpoints? And by the way, I'll explain what an endpoint is because it's, you know, kind of security people use the word funny. Expecting him to say like, I don't, I don't, I don't. And Matthew in fact said, I do, like we do this, we do this, we do this, like here's all the tools, here's all the practices. And I remember actually just like almost closing my laptop and being like, who are you? Like why, you know, like I've, you're like the 10th person I've talked to and no one does these things. And his answer was like, look, we just signed a contract with Google, please don't tell anyone, big deal, again 30-person company. And as part and parcel of closing Google as a customer, they sent us a security questionnaire and it kind of asked the same things you just asked: how do you secure cloud environment, employee endpoints, like blah blah blah. And I had no answers to anything on that questionnaire, but that seemed like a bad thing to say to Google. So, I wrote answers to everything on the questionnaire and then I immediately went and did everything I wrote the answers to. And so, now it is done literally. And I sat there and was like, "Whoa, purchase trigger motivation." Like, you are now going to do whatever Google kind of wants you to hear and whatever Google thinks of as good security, you will do. And that is so different from every conversation I've had. So, that's the like second part of the founding story. There's always two stories.
Interviewer 5:11 ↗
There's always two. So you got started, you kind of found this opportunity in the market. And I remember when we first met, you were three or four or five people.
Christina Cacioppo 5:21 ↗
Probably. Yeah. Three to five.
Interviewer 5:23 ↗
Mechanics Institute, which is this really cool, bizarre kind of like library thing downtown.
Christina Cacioppo 5:31 ↗
57 Post Street. You should stop by it. You can just like walk in.
Interviewer 5:34 ↗
I'm pretty sure it's a cult. It's great.
Christina Cacioppo 5:36 ↗
It's great. Like a good cult. Yeah.
Interviewer 5:38 ↗
And you were first in this market. Now there's a bunch of companies doing things around SOC 2. People know what SOC 2 is. We can actually talk about it here and other types of compliance. But back then, you know, you had just learned about it. It certainly didn't have the grant that we were insane and not like good founder insane like... The struggle. Yeah. Exactly. I want to ask about trust because Vanta at its core is essentially a security company and you were asking these companies to trust you for, you know, handling kind of the compliance workflow for probably the biggest customer they'd ever landed, for the most sensitive deal for where they were going to take their business. How did you approach those conversations?
Christina Cacioppo 6:17 ↗
Yeah, I think two things in retrospect. One was honestly starting with former co-workers, people we'd worked with, like friends of friends. As much as that sounds like cheating, I mean, it kind of is cheating, but it was really helpful because there was a cohort of people where they're like, I kind of know you don't know a ton about this, but I also know you're going to like work really hard and you don't like to fail and I don't really have better options, so like sure, you know, but it's anyway, it's like you kind of had like that part of the Venn diagram. The other part of it, and I sort of mentioned it there, but the other part was we did not start with companies that had compliance standards, that had GRC or security teams. We started with founders who had nothing. And again they were, and I kind of distinctly remember the moment in mid-2019 when Slack started requiring SOC 2 of its vendors. And so it was literally founders that were like, I really want to sell to Slack. Like if I think if I put the Slack logo on my homepage this will be very good for me, but I need this SOC 2 thing. I don't know what that is. I don't know how to get it. You seem plausible. Like I don't like, are you going to knit me a pair of socks? Like I don't even know what's going on, but like I want this so badly and I know nothing and you know something. And I think there was also something to like that place of like very high need, very low knowledge about the problem honestly that also helped when the product was so MVP, you know, when somebody who did know things would be like this isn't for me.
Interviewer 7:45 ↗
You know there's actually a lot of parallels, funny to hear that from how when we started working on Work OS where those early customers and companies were just like I think these people will just be able to figure it out. Just, you know, just and there's a surprising number of problems where you can solve them just by sheer force of will. Like don't give up. Software in a nutshell. Yeah. Totally. Yeah. A surprising number of them will crack open if you're just unrelenting. How did you know when you had product-market fit? You know, so early on SOC 2 didn't really have the same momentum. You were selling to friends and smaller companies. When did it start to evolve and change? Was it a point in time? Was it a...
Christina Cacioppo 8:25 ↗
No, gradual. I mean, there were like specific moments, but I think the product-market fit thing is more of a temperature gauge than a light switch. And then in retrospect, you tell the light switch story, but I actually the lived experience is more like not that, more I don't know, whatever the good version of a boiled frog is. There was a moment in the early days when kind of after the Figma story, we're like a little bit more kind of user research stuff going on, but we're sort of like, okay, we can both code and we have enough hubris to think we can build whatever we want. The issue we've had in our careers is we've built things no one wants, which is not fun. So let's do as much as we can prior to starting to like write TypeScript literally. And so we made early versions of Vanta in spreadsheets and then were kind of like manual SOC 2 consultants for friends' companies. And the first company we went to, literally the kind of hypothesis or the sort of test was can we make them a spreadsheet that they don't like throw us out of their office, you know, like will they, are we at all credible, can we give them a deliverable they sort of believe in and give them like a SOC 2 roadmap basically. And then that worked, and so we took it to the second company which was we actually honestly just kind of finded and replaced the company name like company one and company two. And that was a test of like can we standardize this, like if we give somebody else's roadmap, you know, to this other company, change a little bit on the edges but mostly not, can they tell. And that worked, and then we got this email from a former colleague that was basically like, hey, here you guys have become SOC 2 consultants, really weird, where did your life go wrong, we should definitely get a drink, and also my company needs a SOC 2. So like can I like pay you in booze basically to like go, you know, do whatever it is you're doing for my company. And there that was one of those, I mean it's not like light switch but like light switch moments where you're like, whoa, this person in network but like heard about this from someone else, like I don't even know, we could go track it down, but like they were at someone's house party on Saturday for some reason talking about SOC 2 and this came up and they want it, like that feels good, that felt really good. And so then it became a like oh we should probably stop the spreadsheet consulting cute thing and like start coding. And I think at the time we thought it would take, you know, a year or so to like turn a spreadsheet into code and they're probably more like four and a half years. Kind of misestimated that one. But that was one of the like early trigger moments.
Interviewer 10:58 ↗
Feel like San Francisco is maybe one of the only places you can go to a house party and hear people talking about SOC 2. Gleefully. Why did SOC 2 get so much product-market fit? I think I've heard you talk about this. Obviously Vanta's been very successful, but also there are like YC companies with six people going and getting SOC 2 compliance. Now, it used to just be a big company thing. What happened?
Christina Cacioppo 11:23 ↗
I think yeah, I do think SOC 2 is incredible product-market fit. I talked about it as a product, but I think it was incredible product-market fit. And I think the thing that felt obvious when you really poked at it in 2017 was more companies would get SOC 2 if it did not take so much, if it wasn't so costly. And by costly I kind of mean dollars. Like it was probably you know 50 to 150k all-in then between a consultant and an auditor. But the problem was actually you gave up a lot of your technical team for a year. Like it was costly in terms of team time, but it was also when you talk to people, it's like, "Oh, yes, I know I need better. I want to sell to Slack or, you know, in order to sell to so-and-so, this keeps coming up and so, you know, whatever, like or you know, we're a 20-person company and we're still going to embark on this give up our CTO for a year thing." And so the thing that again I think we saw that was there but like no one else saw, which I'm still a little baffled by honestly, was if you made the easy button for SOC 2, a lot of people would want to press that button. And that's kind of what happened. I think as that happened, SOC 2 went from being we used to call it the like Monopoly Pass Go collect $200 card to the entry ticket, right? It was the first step now. You like must have it. All your competitors have it. And then now you need to go through security questionnaires. You need to go to separate vendor reviews. I also think honestly like a lot of like SOC 2 is not immune to the forces of technology acceleration and so as SOC 2 has gotten more prevalent and accelerated the pros are there and the cons which are very real are also accelerated, more common. There are some reasonable things in SOC 2, there are some things that are stuck in the 90s and less you know reasonable in a 2024 software like cloud software context, and that's all still very true. So like again, the highs are higher, the faults are larger. But it's kind of the same thing just accelerated and like blown out.
Interviewer 13:31 ↗
You have done some things at Vanta that have kind of been atypical for startups and one in particular is that you waited until you were at north of 10 million in revenue before raising your Series A. A lot of folks will raise at one or two million dollars in revenue. I want to ask about that decision and you know you were faking it till you made it. You clearly made it and built the thing. Talk about that company-building step and why specifically that one, why you decided to do that.
Christina Cacioppo 13:59 ↗
Yeah, a couple things. The plan was to raise a Series A at 1 to 2 million. Like that was the plan and there was definitely like a couple freakout moments where you're like oh my gosh we're never going to get there. I think then we kind of got there and I mean everything was burning, like everything was burning fires and you know they're the good fires, we have too many customers, we don't have the support for them, we can't find enough auditors, but also like everything was burning to the ground. It kind of felt like, like the lived experience was everything is broken. And we still had basically the whole seed round in the bank because we charged annually upfront and so some of it just like you're like, "Okay, if I need to go finance whatever, I'll assume I'll like basically dip out of the company for a month." Like that's not going to be, you know, like that seems like a terrible use of time. We don't need the money. We need nine quadrillion other things that like money can't really solve easily. We're also terrible at hiring. So, you might be like, "Why don't you hire?" We tried, but we were just like made every mistake in the book seven different ways. You know, so there was a little bit of like I actually feel remiss financing because oh my god I just need to solve the customer success problem by which I mean we had no CSMs and no customer success and that was very bad. So some of it was that, some of it was I got really lucky and started my career in an early-stage venture firm and so I knew the trick to fundraising is that the best way to raise money is to not need to raise money. And VCs in fact just want to fund businesses that don't need funding. And so you know what people like funding more than a million-dollar Series A is a $2 million Series A, you know, error our Series A, and then $5 million. And so there was a bit of like it's not like we had a window that was going to close. The window was actually just going to extend and it was going to get easier and easier so long as the growth continued. So there was a combo of those. I think also there was a bit of again at this point people still didn't know what SOC 2 was. Thought we were like you know I don't know twiddling our thumbs into the ground like this was not a market and we so knew it was and we knew there would be copycats. We kind of didn't want to go raise a big splashy round yet because we're like oh that's just going to invite a bunch of competition and so like let's hold off on that. I think I pushed that one in particular too far. But there was a moment there where I am glad we didn't be like oh we got to a million dollars in you know six months and you know this is a great business and we just can't fulfill all the demand. Because you're just kind of inviting competition then.
Interviewer 16:36 ↗
I want to ask about competition too. So Work is kind of in a similar spot. We started working on it. People were like what are you... good luck with your life over there? I had a friend that sat me down. It's like an intervention. It was like, are you sure you want to be doing this with your life? Still pretty sure. Back then we didn't have any competitors. Now we do. In Vanta, you have a bunch that have emerged since then. It's no longer a crazier heretical idea. How do you think about that? The competitive market, how do you feel about that? Actually walk us through that, you know, how you felt initially, kind of how that's maybe been incorporated in your company building and how you stay ahead of them.
Christina Cacioppo 17:25 ↗
Yeah, I think got the whole roller coaster. I think in the early... Okay, it did not feel like it in the early days. In the early days, it felt like we were going as fast as possible, you know, like you know, I don't know, like where like you're on a motorcycle and like face pressed back and that's what every day felt like. And in retrospect, we were kind of lackadaisical, you know, and we weren't, we thought we were smarter than our customers in some cases. We definitely weren't. And so when the first like really good set of competitors emerged, one in particular was actually just really good at listening to our customers and hearing what they hated about Vanta and fixing those things. Which is an excellent strategy on their part. And there was a part there that like I was kind of, I was like hurt but it was kind of a self-directed hurt. It was like oh we've heard these things like we know these are pain points and we have not fixed them and like shoot what are we doing? So there's like that piece. Honestly I mean parts of it felt very unfair. Like actually that same company also took screenshots of Vanta and sent them to a dev shop in Mexico and got a product back copied down to the placeholder text. My childhood hero Sally Ride was in two compliance products at one point and you know like that just feels unfair but I think also on the roller coaster like everything or a lot of things are fair in capitalism like fair is not a useful concept. And so like that just doesn't matter. And there's parts that are annoying but like I think it's a deep reality and the most important thing is how you deliver for your customers and kind of you are only as good as the last thing you shipped. Like no one cares we were first. No one cares we like made up the thing and someone else copied it. Like does not matter to someone who is trying to get their job done on a daily basis. And I think internalizing that was kind of emotionally tough at times but also like real like it's reality if you can ignore it if you want but it like won't, you won't end well. I think it ultimately really caused Vanta to get way better at what we do. We got like way better at listening to customers, way better at not overthinking what they said or what we thought. Like we kind of had this like, we had a, at our worst we had a tendency to like overly intellectualize customer problems and our solutions and this just like got rid of that in a way that I think is actually very helpful. And just like a lot more resilience too. Whereas now when there's like you know this like you know kind of a new competitor slightly less often than there used to be but there's kind of a newer one in the last six months and you're like okay we've seen this playbook like you like know to act fast, you know what to do, you know some of the things, some of their critiques are halfway valid and we should like take the feedback and fix them and some of the stuff they're saying is just nonsense but like here's why we are confident it's nonsense and go combat that in the market. And I do think Vanta is a lot stronger now than we were in call it like 2021 when we were just more Midwestern about it. It was just kind of like people are being mean to us on the internet and saying untrue things like why would you even do that, you know, and like it doesn't matter. They're doing it like what are you doing next? And like in our case like hopefully not saying mean things back but like combating it in more productive ways. Yeah. I think especially as a founder, it just stings when you see like what do you do? Do you have any self-respect over there? Again, not a useful question. Doesn't matter.
Interviewer 21:00 ↗
Yeah. And I think on the other side of it, we've had a few kind of similar things. It's been amazing to watch like a competitive dynamic in the landscape. It's kind of like someone writing unit tests against your business model, trying to figure out vulnerable... which is kind of useful at a point. It's hard when you see something like oh yeah that's totally something we didn't think about or that you are trying to exploit the area of our business that we haven't built strength in but sometimes without that you don't see it or you can't prioritize it. You know so it does make you more resilient. Started with SOC 2. SOC 1, SOC 3. What else have you guys built?
Christina Cacioppo 21:43 ↗
Oh god. SOC 12. No, hopefully never. We started with SOC 2 again, not because it was the best thing out there, but it seemed like in 2017 it was the closest to the baseline reasonable standard. It was like the first thing companies got to though, so it was the first thing we started with. Again, very much pros and cons to it. But I think are like even more true today than they used to be. The idea was never to build a SOC 2 factory. Actually at times talked about it as a SOC 2 factory which is like a very demeaning way but some of that was because again like in the beginning we also didn't think a SOC 2 factory is very good business, turns out it's actually a surprisingly good business, but it was like that's not what we are trying to do. The idea was can you use the economic pressure motivation of like revenue growth and new customers to go drive a bunch of security practices into a company and then build those over time and along the way make the demonstration of those security practices, the audits, the questionnaires, not these like well I talked to an auditor six months ago and they wrote me this PDF and therefore you should trust our good security practices today thing which is like bad when you think about how software works but something that's real-time and continuous. And so anyway all to say we've made it for us really easy to add new frameworks and standards to Vanta because honestly it was because we didn't like, we'd have these prioritization discussions about like should we support TISAX, the German automotive standard, and we just get into these like prioritization conversations that would like drive everyone crazy. And so the strategy was instead how can we launch a new standard in four days and then if it takes four days we never have to prioritize these things, we'll just be able to do them. So we support about three dozen standards today. Added one actually, added anyone today. There's a team that just does that. Dry on the standards thing because yeah, when you're like, should we add TISAX or this other thing and then also trade it off against other product work and you're just like, oh my gosh, I don't want to sit through these meetings.

27 more exchanges in this transcript

Sign in free to read the rest of this interview. No card required.

Sign in to read the full transcript

Cite this transcript

APA, MLA, BibTeX
APA

Cacioppo, C. (2025, October 21). Compliance Is Your Competitive Advantage — Christina Cacioppo, Vanta | Enterprise Ready Conf 2024 [Interview transcript]. WorkOS. CEOInterviews.AI. https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/3104777/

MLA

Christina Cacioppo. "Compliance Is Your Competitive Advantage — Christina Cacioppo, Vanta | Enterprise Ready Conf 2024." WorkOS, 21 Oct. 2025. Transcript, CEOInterviews.AI, https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/3104777/.

BibTeX
@misc{cacioppo2025_3104777,
  author       = {Christina Cacioppo},
  title        = {Compliance Is Your Competitive Advantage — Christina Cacioppo, Vanta | Enterprise Ready Conf 2024},
  howpublished = {Interview transcript, WorkOS. CEOInterviews.AI},
  year         = {2025},
  month        = {oct},
  url          = {https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/3104777/},
  note         = {Speaker-attributed transcript with timestamps}
}