Mohamed Ali1:00:27
Thank you, Russell. That was great. And good morning everybody. Here's my plan for today. First, we'll talk about keeping the fleet flying safely today. Then we'll give you an update about the LEAP durability, I'm sure a lot of you are expecting that. Then we'll talk about 9X, and then we'll finish with the future of flight. Sounds like a good plan. I want to start with our safety philosophy today because we believe that bringing them home safely is what earns us the right to lift people up, which in turn earns us the right to inventing the future of flight. And if the engineering team were sitting here, they will finish the sentence for me: we find problems, and they would say before problems find us. We find problems before problems find us, because when they find us, they are painful and expensive. And that's why we have institutionalized enhanced inspection of our safety critical parts in all of our new make shops and in our MRO network as well. Moving to tomorrow, we have a term we call it Engineering 360. Obviously, the engineering team is involved in the design of the parts in the engine, but we don't stop there. We are working and partnering with the supply chain team and the entire supply chain, partnering to solve problems. And we also are with customers, understanding their pain points and continuous improvement of durability and reliability of our engines and services to them. And also partnering with Farah's team, with the MRO network team, in order to debottleneck turnaround time and deliver engines for our customers. And I want to give you an example of that. Late last year, what was limiting LEAP production was the high pressure turbine blade coating process. The engineering team went there to that supplier. I went there also myself. We spent the time to understand the problem. It turns out that the furnace they are using is very similar to furnaces we are using for the manufacturing of our Ceramic Matrix Composites. We applied the right expertise right at the impact point and partnered with that supplier to solve the problem, and it's no longer a constraint within a month. This enables us to approach the RISE design. RISE, revolutionary innovations for sustainable engines, not only for sustainability, not only for the durability and the reliability that our customers are expecting, but also for producibility. And just building on the same example I told you about, we're approaching the high pressure turbine design of that new technology for the future, obviously with sustainability goals, with fuel burn improvements, obviously with durability and reliability, but also with producibility. And we are cutting out about half of the manufacturing process of that high pressure turbine technology to make it more producible. This is the virtuous cycle that we talk about. This is the relentless continuous improvement that's in our Flight Deck. And I want to talk safety first and go back to the safety culture. And while Safety Management System, SMS, and Quality Management System, QMS, and the associated processes are extremely important, the bedrock of safety is our culture. And there are four tenets to that culture that I want to talk to you about. First, be where the action is, at the point of impact problem solving. There are no walls between the engineering team and the supply chain team and the suppliers of the safety critical parts. Second is transparency. It's for nothing if you discover problems and you cannot talk about them. You will not be able to solve them. And that's why over many decades, we have learned and institutionalized that no single person can make a safety decision. No single person can make a safety decision. It's always a team work, it's always a cross-functional team making the safety calls. The third is proactivity. Don't wait for problems to find us. We find problems. And now I'm expecting you to respond back saying we find problems before they find us. And fourth is we expect zero defects. We demand zero defects. We demand that from everybody, but we never assume perfection. These are the four tenets of our safety culture. But finally, I want to say we do not compete on safety. We happily share that knowledge with everybody in the industry because we humbly believe that it is our responsibility to lead the industry in that continuous improvement journey. This is how it works, and I want to take you through a real world example of how we are applying these four tenets. And it starts with the design first. While we are designing the part and the engine, we anticipate there will be defects. We anticipate there will be some damage, and we design for a specific size of damage. And even with that damage present or that defect present, we designed so that the part and the engine will safely finish its whole life in its entirety. And we call that our damage tolerant design philosophy. Second, we have implemented the state-of-the-art enhanced ultrasonic inspection in our new make shops. As a matter of fact, we have had enhanced ultrasonic inspection of safety critical powder parts since their inception in the 1990s. And in 2018, as John talked about, we expanded that and extended it to be implemented in our MRO shops. None of that is mandated by the regulations. None of that is mandated by regulation. All of that is mandated by us because it's consistent with our philosophy to seek out. And we are not stopping there. We are developing advanced module level in-engine inspection, which means that you don't have to disassemble the module to apply that enhanced inspection. Why is that important? It's important because it's simpler for the humans at the MRO shops to do, and here simpler means safer. And in 2023, actually in early 2023, we developed a program we call it Partnership for Safety and Quality, in which we work with our safety critical parts suppliers. And in that program, we teach them the importance of what they do. This is part of the Safety Management System, SMS, we call that safety promotion. We also have developed with them joint quality improvement metrics, KPIs, and they have continuous improvement in them. And every quarter, we sit with the CEO and the lead leadership team of those suppliers and we understand the status and work together on problem solving toward that continuous improvement. We are not perfect, and we don't assume to be so. That is our safety culture. Let's now talk LEAP and LEAP durability roadmap in particular. We told you before that we have a handful of parts that are limiting the LEAP durability, particularly in the Middle East and in the hot and harsh environment. We already introduced the fix to the shroud and all new engines since 2018 have that fix and they're working really well. We already introduced the fix to the radial drive shaft since 2019 and all new engines since then have that fix and they're working really well. And last year, we stood in front of you and we told you we'll introduce the fuel nozzle coking fix in 2024. And I'm proud to stand here in front of you and say that the first production engine with that fix is already at Airbus, ready to go. And also last year, we told you we'll introduce the fix to the high pressure turbine blade in 2024, and the first production set is ready in the shop and we are on track for 2024 introduction for LEAP 1A. Now let's talk about what that means. So for the first time for me in public to state that we expect production engines at the end of this year to be at the mature time on wing for LEAP 1A, and 1B will follow in 2025. And I always get this question: why do I feel confident? And the reason I feel confident is because it's not on the back of a theory, it's not on the back of analysis, and certainly it's not on the back of wishful thinking. It's because we have done real testing. So now moving to the right hand side of this page, we tested the current configuration in the actual dust environment. We simulated the actual environment and have simulated the actual failure mode. And the wrinkles you see on the first picture, they are the precursor for the failure mode that our customers see in the Middle East. We tested the new design, same environment, same dust, and that's the second picture, and the failure mode is gone. And it's gone at more than two times the number of cycles, and we could have gone actually longer. We actually had to remove the LEAP 1A engine so we can put the LEAP 1B engine on the test stand. And I'm happy to tell you that that LEAP 1B engine is actually performing really well in that test. This is what we call turn on and turn off. Turn on the problem in an actual condition and turn it off in testing with the new design. And to be honest with you, if it's not turn on and turn off, I will not believe the outcomes. And this is why we feel confident. Applying the exact same playbook to GE9X. And as a reminder, GE9X is already a certified engine. Same playbook, learned from prior engine generations. It's the culture of relentless continuous improvement, and it works. Every engine came to have a better durability at entry into service than the prior engine, and GE9X will be no exception to that. As a matter of fact, the difference is we are learning from the previous engines, accelerating the testing, and we're proud to say that the first blade improvement is already complete and we are now heading into the second dust test ahead of entry into service. This is coming down the learning curve, meeting our customer expectations faster, early maturation faster, which translates into less risk, more confidence, and less cost. This positions the GE9X to succeed the iconic GE90 that we all came to love. So we have lifted people up, we brought them home safely, and now we earned the right to invent the future of flight. And I get asked this question a lot. Many ask me why open fan, and the answer is very simple. And Russell talked about customer expectations for more than 20% fuel burn improvements. Not just customers, the industry, the planet expects that we are doing more. 20% or more of fuel burn improvements. And that 20% of fuel burn improvement from the engine is very hard to achieve. Actually, it's practically impossible to achieve that 20% fuel burn improvement without the open fan. And the reason is physics. It's actually very simple. So over the past many decades since the invention of jet engines, the engines get bigger, I think you're all familiar with that, and that's the best way to achieve the fuel burn improvement. The fan gets bigger, more air is going through that fan, it's the most economical way of generating that fuel burn improvement. However, what's also happening is the nacelle is becoming bigger, which is increasing the drag, and that has diminishing returns. And now we are very close to an inflection point in which significant increases in the fan diameter will generate so much drag in the nacelle around it that will eat out all of the benefits coming from that fan diameter increase. That is the inflection point that we are very close to it. And that's why a ducted engine, which is one that has a nacelle around it, has less than half the fuel burn improvements that can come from an open fan. So we said, let's go through this thought experiment. Can we actually take that ducted engine and run this hypothetical thought experiment to see if we can make it match the 20% fuel burn improvement that the open fan can achieve? And because you are now running out of the lever to substantially increase the fan diameter because of the drag in the nacelle that I talked to you about, then you are left with increasing the core temperature or increasing the core complexity. We said okay, well let's try to increase the core temperature. And the answer to that is that temperature in that core will be about half the temperature of the Sun's surface. There's no material on Earth that can sustain that, let alone the durability, reliability, and complexity challenges that will come with that. That's the beauty of open fan. It's 20% fuel burn improvement without any of these drawbacks. Less risk, higher durability, higher reliability, which is what our customers expect, because of the simplicity. And on the CFM RISE program, we're working with our partner Safran, and we are at a stage of program in which we are making real testing. We're doing real testing on real hardware and making real progress. And I'm going to focus on four components, critical components of the CFM RISE program. First, the high pressure turbine. We use the world's fastest supercomputer to design that next generation of high pressure turbine. We took that design, put it already in a full engine test, and not only it proved to achieve significant fuel burn improvement, but it proved also to be more durable. And by the way, that technology can also be applied to today's engine architecture. Moving to hybrid electric, we were the first company to be testing hybrid electric megawatt class system at altitude at 45,000 feet. And we today have an engine at our test facility in Peebles, Ohio, that will be reconfigured later this year to test megawatt class hybrid electric power extraction. And we are thrilled and humbled and proud to be collaborating with NASA and Boeing in our hybrid electric program. And we have tested also noise, working with Airbus, and we have showed and demonstrated that the open fan technology has the capability to achieve lower noise than today's LEAP. Think about that: lower noise than today's LEAP. And a lot of that is the advantage of the supercomputing capability that I talked to you about. And as we speak, we are running an engine testing to validate our fan blade technology, and there is an ongoing wind tunnel testing to optimize the installation of this configuration on the aircraft. Real testing, real hardware, making real progress. This is what the team stands for. We find safety issues and fix them before they find us. We do what we say we will do, and we earn the right to invent the future of flight. This is what makes me proud to stand here to represent the GE Aerospace team and the GE Aerospace engineering team. With that, thank you very much, and Russell, I hand it back to you.