Back
Eddie Harrell
Co-President of Audio Division, URBAN ONE INC

The Way Forward Leader Lunch Break with Eddie Harrell and Kevin Griffin

🎥 Jul 09, 2020 📺 Cleveland Leadership Center ⏱ 44m 👁 68 views
Eddie Harrell, Regional Vice President, Radio One Kevin Griffin, Senior Vice President, The Adcom Group Eddie and Kevin talked ...
Watch on YouTube

About Eddie Harrell

Eddie Harrell, then regional vice president for Radio One, participated in a September 2020 virtual discussion titled "The Way Forward Leader Lunch Break" with Kevin Griffin of The Adcom Group. During the conversation, Harrell described how Radio One, whose stations target African-American audiences, used its platform during protests to promote peaceful demonstration and open phone lines for community expression. He said the company realized that discussions within its own audience were "preaching to the choir" and sought to engage outside listeners by organizing an unprecedented simulcast forum with all of Cleveland's radio partners on the same topic at the same time. Harrell stated that the forum was designed to bring participants together "with no sides" and to start conversations from "a place of commonality." He noted that the moderator was given full control over the questions to ensure a serious discussion, and that the conversation avoided partisan politics to maintain audience engagement. Harrell also said that some colleagues received negative feedback for addressing the subject, which he viewed as a positive sign that the conversation was meaningful. He argued that leaders must acknowledge systemic racism and inequities as a starting point for progress, and that those who do not recognize this risk being part of the problem.

Source: AI-verified profile updated from Eddie Harrell's recent appearances. Browse all interviews →

Transcript (27 segments)
M
Marion0:00
So today we'd like to welcome two very special people: Eddie Harrell and Kevin Griffin. Let me tell you a little bit about them. Eddie serves as Regional Vice President for Radio One. Prior to coming to Cleveland, he served at Radio One in Columbus and prior to that he also served for five years as President and CEO of the Urban League in Columbus. He's a board member of his alma mater, Otterbein University, and a former board member of COSI in Columbus. And most importantly, he is a longtime season ticket holder for the Cleveland Browns and has made that trek up North on 71 on many occasions. We're also pleased, and I know he's proud, that he is an alum of Leadership Cleveland 2015. You do have a fan club here today, Eddie. And Kevin Griffin: Kevin currently serves as Senior Vice President of Marketing and Strategy at Adcom, a position he has held for four years. Prior to that, you're going to sense a theme here, he served as Vice President of the Fan Experience and Marketing for the Cleveland Browns. Prior to that, he was with the Seattle Seahawks. He is a youth football and track coach in Strongsville, and sports are at the center of his life. I think he's currently waiting for his daughter to finish gymnastics practice. He is a board chair for the Cleveland Peacemakers Alliance of the Boys and Girls Clubs and a member of Leadership Cleveland 2019. So Kevin reached out to me several weeks ago and shared an idea that he was working on with Eddie and with their fellow LC alum Keith Hotchkiss of iHeartRadio. I think what they were trying to do echoes a personal philosophy that Kevin once shared: 'Live humbly, attack each day with an infectious passion that uplifts others, strive to fulfill my purpose, love, learn, and lead.' And lead is exactly what they did in forming an amazing collaboration to deliver 'Justice for All: A Conversation About Race, Equality, and Inclusion' on June 17th. With that, I'm going to turn it over to Kevin and Eddie.
K
Kevin Griffin2:37
Gentlemen. Thank you, Marion, and Rachel, and everyone who has put this together. We really appreciate the opportunity to spend some time with fellow leaders from the Northeast Ohio and Cleveland community. Eddie and I briefly spoke and discussed how we wanted to kick this thing off today. What we wanted to do is set this up with a brief background of how we arrived at the idea for a 90-minute kind of conversation over 21 different radio stations across Cleveland at one point in time. So I'm going to start there and then turn it over to Eddie to give you a bit of background, and we'll go back and forth with each other if you don't mind. So, first of all, Eddie and I happen to know each other. We're in somewhat of the same industry. He leads a number of incredible radio stations and digital properties here, not only in Northeast Ohio but across the state of Ohio, with Radio One. I'm obviously in marketing and advertising. So we've gotten to know each other during my time at the Cleveland Browns and my time as well. We built a rapport and friendship. Following the weekend of protests around the country after George Floyd was brutally murdered in front of us all, I just sent Eddie a note and said, 'What's next?' or 'What now?' something of that nature. I was just reaching out to Eddie to see what we might be able to do. I had spent the weekend—and particularly Monday—just listening. I was listening to some of the content on his stations across the Radio One platform as well as other radio stations across the dial here in Northeast Ohio. Quite frankly, I was hearing two different conversations. There were two different conversations. I felt like people's values were somewhat similar, but they just weren't singing from the same hymnal. So I asked Eddie what we might be able to do. Fortunately, he emailed me back and said, 'Let's have a conversation.' We did, and we really had no idea at that point in time what might happen. We just wanted to have a conversation about where we were. In the business of communication and marketing, the first thing you should do is really be an incredible listener, and that's what I think Eddie and I tried to do from there. We decided after about a half-hour, 45-minute call how we could possibly leverage the strength of Eddie's radio stations and all of his communications platforms across Radio One. Then we said, 'What about other people? How do we begin to have a conversation that we're hearing on some stations along with the same type of conversation that we're having?' A heavy conversation. The idea was simply this: people weren't saying the same thing, and because we weren't saying the same thing, we weren't starting in the same place, and that non-commonality was prohibiting us from moving forward. So that's how we got started. I'll hand it off to Eddie to take it from there.
E
Eddie Harrell5:26
Yeah, I think that again, I want to thank everybody, Rachel and Marion, for giving us this platform, and probably you listening today. I think it's an important conversation. Kevin gave great context for how we got there. One of the things we realized is that historically, our stations across the country are really targeted at African Americans. On any Radio One station, you're going to hear a hip-hop format, or R&B, or gospel, or news talk primarily directed towards an African American audience. Historically, in situations like we saw the first week of the protest, we do some things that are very flexible. We had the mayor on, we had the police chief on to talk to our audience, and our primary focus was pushing the idea of peaceful protest because we didn't want to be engaging in fighting anybody or doing things that cause property destruction or personal injury. We wanted to make sure that we were informative about peaceful protesting. Also, historically, Black radio is really viewed as a vehicle to speak to communities, so we opened up our phone lines, we cut off the music many times that weekend, and really allowed people to call and talk about their frustrations, but also use it as a teachable moment as well. Typically, in those types of situations, our audience agrees with the things that we're talking about—they agree about social justice and attacking inequalities. So when Kevin sent me the email and we had our initial discussion, what we agreed upon is that to have the discussion with my audience, which is a big audience in Northeast Ohio, is somewhat preaching to the choir. We need to engage those outside of that audience about what's going on and be part of a solution-based process. We just cooked up, in a 30-45 minute conversation, what would it look like if we could imagine a day where we can get all the radio partners in Cleveland to agree to do a simulcast forum on the same topic at the same time, and see what the appetite for that was. To my surprise, and I guess I really shouldn't be surprised because moving up here I saw how close-knit this community is, and in times of need, all the radio partners of the major groups—inclusive of my stations at Radio One, iHeart, Intercom (formerly CBS), Good Karma, ESPN, and Salem—all quickly said yes. That was the first barrier that we really had to get over: their willingness to talk about the issue of race and social justice across all of our platforms at the same time. Once the yes was put out there by everybody, then we were able to quickly move and do something that has been unprecedented in the media industry across the country: to have competing groups put down that competition for 90 minutes and run the same thing across all of our networks at the same time. That was monumental, and it was an agreement made by the leaders pretty quickly, actually. That allowed us to put more of our effort into what this looks like and the content. So Kevin, I'll pass back to you to talk about the next steps.
K
Kevin Griffin8:58
Fair. I want to point back to one of the things that I think is so important with Leadership Cleveland, and that is the importance of relationships. Eddie touched on that—what that means and how we value that here in Northeast Ohio. As Eddie and I wrapped up our original conversation, it was, 'Okay, who do we reach out to? Who do we know?' Fortunately, between the two of us, not only do we know everyone with one exception, we have incredible relationships with these folks. So to ask them if they would be willing to go to their corporations and step up, and also how do they sell that into their own staffs? Fortunately, we have trust in relationships, and that matters a lot here, as every one of us knows in Northeast Ohio. Sam and Keith, who is one of our Leadership Cleveland classmates, and Tim and everyone stepped up, and there was a level of trust that allowed us to move fast. You've probably heard the saying that we move at the speed of trust. Because we had that trust as a baseline, we were able to get going. So then those relationships extended. Once we solidified the concept, we were able to reach out to the mayor's office—again, trust and relationships between a number of us with the mayor's office and Chief Williams—and then others that we began to populate. As Eddie mentioned, the real work after we got beyond the 'yes' was how do we begin to program the conversation? Who are the guests? What would be the most appropriate conversation to have for the community? Then how do we bring a balance? What we meant by balance was number one, there are no sides. That was a really important factor as we laid out the memo of understanding: 'There aren't any sides here.' But what we do need to do is in some way shape or form begin to bring everyone to the table so we can start our conversations moving forward from a place of commonality. What had been interesting—and I hope you don't mind, but I think you and I both expressed this—throughout that weekend and into Monday, we had phone calls from our Black and white friends. There were similar conversations. Our white friends were looking for space to be able to express their opinion in a safe way, even if it was maybe off-kilter, but they needed to express themselves and were looking for guidance. Our African American friends and colleagues were saying, 'What are we going to do next? I'm feeling a certain way, I'm having a certain experience, but that's not being articulated across the dial.' That's what we were able to do: bring the mayor to the table, bring Chief Williams, and other leaders including David Gilbert. I think we put together what hopefully was a good show. It was poignant, and there were a lot of moments within that show where I was uncomfortable. I remember sending Eddie a text saying, 'This is like award-winning content, but I'm uncomfortable,' which was good because we were beginning to have conversations across the dial. If I were only listening to that content on a Radio One station, I would have been comfortable. But knowing the audience, I knew that there were things that other people were going to hear for the first time or maybe not actually agree with, which was the point of the show. So that's how we got there: building the relationships to end up getting the right type of content and message. Originally we had an idea of what a good show would be, an hour. Ultimately, it probably could have been two hours. One of the things that, as we're self-reflective, is to think okay, what do we do next after this? We kind of threw out a grenade in terms of a conversation, but there wasn't necessarily a structured follow-up for people to either continue the dialogue or to move to action. That's one of the areas I hope we can begin to focus on as we go into the several months.
E
Eddie Harrell12:58
I think that again, Kevin talked about the different phone calls we received after the first weekend from our white friends and colleagues and our Black friends and colleagues and family. Again, the conversations were a lot different, even with our colleagues within the media industry. As we started to think of how do we put this together, there were concerns that this just didn't turn into a political conversation because it's much broader than that. Once we got the trust that this is a healthy dialogue—it's not a forum where all the answers are going to be, we're not going to come up with all the answers—but at least starting the conversation is part of a solution-based process. That, for many, is the uncomfortable piece. So we have to be comfortable being uncomfortable. That starts with being willing to tackle the issues head-on. So when we thought of who can we get to moderate this, because that was a key decision-making point, we had to pick somebody that had the trust and credibility across all spectrums, whether it was a conservative-leaning format or a progressive format, somebody that the community would recognize. We quickly realized Ramona Robinson was that person. We talked to her, and the first thing she said to me was, 'I'm not giving softballs. If you want me to let off all the people, I'm not that person because this is a serious topic. If I'm going to invest 90 minutes of my time on such a sensitive topic, I need to have the flexibility to really attack the issues.' So we gave her full license to craft the questions and the conversation as she saw fit, because she is an award-winning journalist. We gave her that space. We did have political leadership with Mayor Jackson, we had Police Chief Williams, but we needed somebody to be reflective of the grassroots communities out there. That's why we chose Marsha Mockabee, CEO of the Urban League of Greater Cleveland. From a business leaders perspective, there was no better person than David Gilbert, who as you all know runs Destination Cleveland and the Greater Cleveland Sports Commission, who really has a great sense of CEO and executive level leadership here. We didn't want to leave that out of the conversation because, as Kevin discussed, some of the discussions that I had right after that first weekend were from some of my Black, C-level friends and Caucasian friends who would say, 'I want to do the right thing, I want to be helpful, but I don't know what to say. If I say something and I phrase it the wrong way, then I'm going to be backtracking and have to clean things up.' That really helped Kevin and I determine that this really needed to be a broad-based conversation because we felt from a corporate and civic and community leadership level, there was a willingness to do the right thing, but many of those people needed help having that initial conversation. We wanted to create that space to do that.
K
Kevin Griffin16:33
If you don't mind, Eddie, I think what was interesting is that it was so vivid to watch George Floyd die in front of us. That sparked a motivation. I think all on this call understand the concept of motivation. Now that everyone's eyes were wide open, hopefully we can take advantage of this moment to have the right conversation because their eyes are open, hopefully their hearts are open along with their minds at the same time. But motivation is different than inspiration. Motivation gives you a week or two, and then we didn't want to lose that motivation. We wanted to take this moment of time to inspire more people to get involved. That inspiration is going to have a longer lingering effect than just this moment of time because believe it or not, our news cycle moves so darn fast. People probably have somewhat forgotten about the way they felt at that moment when they saw George Floyd and that murder. Quite candidly, I haven't experienced anything really like this in my life. When I see that video now the other day, it triggers something inside of me—physically triggers something—to see his life taken away. So we wanted to use that moment in time to get people while it was still important to them, while they still have questions, and quite frankly while they were somewhat emotional about what they saw. Hopefully we were able to accomplish that. I'll leave it with this before maybe we open up with questions, Rachel. I know we missed in a couple of really important areas: number one, what was the follow-up, and number two, the young people who were out on the streets actually protesting and doing the really hard grassroots work—their voices weren't heard during our show, during the program. That was a miss, and that wasn't a miss by design. That was just we were moving fast, and as we know here in Cleveland, you can work with people that you trust and we work usually with institutions that are already established. That's how we ended up with our show guests. But I think we have to continue to support and honor the young people who are out here doing hard work. When it's time for them to put their feet up, someone else has to pick it up and support them another way. So we got to keep this going. That's really important. I hope through this, more young people—and I don't mean super young, but younger people and people whose voices haven't been heard from a leadership perspective in our community—their voices begin to be heard, and they have a seat at the table as we go forward.
E
Eddie Harrell19:09
Yeah, I think it's important to note that some of the post-reaction was some of the same. There's a recognition that our younger voices in the community need that forum. I suspect if we were to do something like this again, we would do something virtually, we would hit the young people where they are acting because they're large consumers of social media. There's a different way to approach them, and we'll make sure we do that next time. Again, we were fast on this because we wanted to make sure we were operating in the moment. To get that many broadcasters to agree to do something, you move while you have the agreement to get it done, and we were able to get it done. Some of the post-reaction has been very positive, and there are things for us to learn from as well. Some of the post-reaction I've received is thanks for having that conversation because it allows people to at least open the door to have the conversation—Black, white, and others—because the feedback I'm getting is that starting the conversation is perhaps the hardest part. Once you do that, then you can create a system where people are operating in a safe space to talk about biases, to talk about experiences that people have had, and for people to actually listen. I think the biggest takeaway we can really take from this is the forum for people to listen and then operate in a safe space to do what they think is the right thing. That's probably the biggest thing that could come out of this. Our small part we could play in doing this was well worth it. For 21 stations to play the same content for 90 minutes is a big deal. I want to thank all of our partners for doing that and with such expedience because it was something that we thought was important. Quite frankly, as we've done the research, nothing like that has ever really happened around the country before. There might be one other example that's somewhat close, but not to the degree where you brought five different competitors together to the table to work. I'll leave it with this before I open up for questions: one of the things that was really important for me to not only hear and learn about but also to watch here in my time with Leadership Cleveland was to really understand that it's not always the 'what' of a leader, but it's also the 'how'—the care, the professionalism, and the tact that Kevin, Keith, Tim, and Tom all displayed throughout these conversations and some negotiations was really important. Kevin, I tip my cap to you, even the conversation with Ramona and her husband as we negotiated her participation was so darn important. I just share that as an outcome of things that are important as we lead: it's also the 'how' and really important in what we do as we go forward. One last note before we pass over for questions: I think it's important to make sure we recognize some of the people behind the scenes. The efforts that young Kevin really served as a kind of producer for this, but we also had the engineers from all five groups that had to work behind this thing painstakingly so it could actually happen on air at the same time—it was simultaneous. Big kudos to Jerry Calo, the chief engineer at Radio One, and working with his engineering colleagues across the market who have a high level of collegiality amongst each other to make the technical side of that work. That's part of the byproduct of this thing: we proved that people from different competitive landscapes can work together when there's a common goal.
R
Rachel23:16
Thank you both for sharing kind of behind the scenes of bringing this important conversation to the airwaves. We have had a few questions come in. To start, were you able to generate any metrics that indicated how many people might have tuned in to the production? Kevin, I'll start with you.
E
Eddie Harrell23:37
We know that we had... which was higher than probably our typical... well, not lower than our typical broadcast. Basically, the number of phone calls we received, and we actually did stream this on our stations. I've not put together a comprehensive report from all five broadcasters, but I know from at least from our end it was well tuned in. So we can actually report that back out. I think that's one of the things: we got it done and probably haven't come back together to see how many people listened. We do know that from our competitors, our colleagues, on some stations they got some feedback that wasn't quite so positive because it was a very dicey subject and sometimes people just don't want to hear something that makes them uncomfortable. Some of the phone calls or emails that some of our colleagues received weren't all rosy pictures being painted. But I see that as a positive thing because at least we were willing, and I really commend our colleagues because they knew that they had some formats where this message may not be very well received, and they were willing to do it anyway. I think that's one thing we probably need to circle back on and see collectively what our listeners' impact was—up or down or indifferent to the conversation.
K
Kevin Griffin25:04
Yeah, and I'll add to that. As Eddie mentioned, his colleagues having the courage—this show preempted, and this is not little, this is a fact, it preempted normally where Rush Limbaugh sits at that time. So you have folks who are tuning in to listen from Rush Limbaugh who all of a sudden they're hearing from our program. You're going to get some emails and phone calls from there, right, with such an avid audience that Rush Limbaugh has. I would tell you this: we built a website and some social platforms to support 'Justice for All.' On that day, there were over 3,000 different unique website views, which is pretty significant with a website that just got stood up within 24 hours. A lot of people were coming in to relisten to the program but also to get some background about the program. Although we don't have the hard metrics in terms of overall listenership, we know there was strong engagement across those platforms.
R
Rachel26:14
You mentioned that this is a challenging topic and that you were able to keep politics out of it, and you might have even had some listeners who were tuning in specifically to hear a political conversation. As you were prepping for the discussion, how did you work to keep the politics out of a conversation that often heads there? Eddie, do you mind if I take this first?
K
Kevin Griffin26:38
No, please.
Yeah, so although as many years ago... a couple things. Although I'm a marketing executive, I have a content background. I had worked with Keith and with Tom and Sam and all their stations, building out in those radio networks and programming and working with talent. It's something that I really enjoy. So I got a chance to sit with Ramona on a number of occasions over the weekend. We spent time reviewing what we wanted the structure of the conversation to look like and then a number of rounds of questions. But I intentionally did not share that with anyone else besides Ramona. We talked about that and to honor what she had asked, so that everyone would be a little bit surprised. We had some guardrails. But anytime you have an elected official, it's going to feel political just by nature, so I'm not sure if it's anyone's individual point of view that's political. What I would say is throughout the show, we really were only dealing in the facts as opposed to policy that might lean one way or the other from a political spectrum. I didn't hear anything that I would say was for the most part political; it was just people's points of view. And quite frankly, I thought Ramona did a really nice job asking some questions of both the mayor and Chief Williams. That was appropriate. I thought all the guests did a great job, but I really appreciated David Gilbert's point of view as the lone white male and corporate leader on the call. He really kind of said, 'Here it is. Here's how we have to be able to move forward.' He shared his journey, which was uncomfortable, and I thought that was a moment of time that was poignant in the show. I was hopeful that people would be able to take that away and connect with his point of view because it was similar to maybe theirs.
E
Eddie Harrell28:44
Yeah, I thought it was very important that it not turn into a partisan type conversation. When we talk about metrics, there would have been immediate tuneout depending on which side of the spectrum people are politically. So it was very important for us to make sure we stayed on that path. The mayor, we needed to have him on because the city of Cleveland was in the spotlight in terms of what was going on. It was very appropriate to have him. But if you listen to the mayor, we didn't talk Republican or Democrat, we didn't talk left or right, we didn't talk conservative or liberal. We talked about facts of what was going on, and it stayed a nonpartisan conversation. Because if it had become political, half of our audience would have just dropped out just like that. That's not what we wanted.
R
Rachel29:39
In thinking about how you crafted this conversation that stayed out of that realm, how might someone translate that experience to more of a corporate setting where there might be a large array of people at different levels of comfort and awareness around issues of race and systemic racism?
E
Eddie Harrell30:01
I think David Gilbert actually did a brilliant job of addressing that. I think he challenged his executive leadership colleagues in Northeast Ohio to be honest about where you're at when it comes to diversity in your ranks or having these type of conversations. He said, 'Yes, it's an uncomfortable conversation, but it's one we need to have.' I think he laid out that challenge in a brilliant way to give latitude to people to again be uncomfortable and know it might create emotional discussions that need to be had. To me, I think there's a stark ... now the next steps are what's most important. If you believe diversity is good for business, then you are willing to have difficult conversations within your own organization as a leader. Be at the forefront of that so everybody under your leadership umbrella knows that it's important. We all know that leadership starts at the top. Whether you get good results or bad results, the leader gets the praise when something is great and doesn't get to blame when something is bad. So taking the bull by the horns and addressing this, I think he laid it out in a great way to allow the leaders within Northeast Ohio to take the next step.
K
Kevin Griffin31:38
Yeah, I appreciate the question. At our agency, a lot of our clients are beginning to ask this question over the last two to three weeks really. It relates to where they stand in terms of corporate leadership and understanding their internal and external stakeholders, and where they should stand on issues related to their mission, vision, and values. I think our counsel has really been that there are moments of time when there's principled leadership and there's kind of business decisions. This is a moment of time where you have to have principled leadership. Quite frankly, what we're hearing in the marketplace is that leaders are starting to feel a lot of pressure from their internal stakeholders, even more so than their external stakeholders. Their employee base is really pushing to get clarity. They might not like the answer, but they're at least asking, 'Where do we stand?' Because I hitched my wagon to this corporation, and I want to know where we stand on these issues. It's a tough conversation. But I think as corporations, their boards and their exec teams together, hopefully they're listening first and foremost to their employees. They're able to shape their position and then the way they communicate that out to all their internal and external stakeholders appropriately. I don't want to reference sports too much, but it's been incredible over the last 72 hours what's happened to the NFL team in Washington and the corporate pressure from venture capitalists quite frankly who are forcing that team to make a name change based on a racial slur. So we're hearing more and more of that coming through.
R
Rachel33:19
So anyone who's tried to put a collaboration together knows that it can be very challenging, especially in a short amount of time. Looking back at how this came together and the relationships and trust that were in place, what are some best practices or things you've walked away with from this experience that others could learn from to have a successful collaboration?
E
Eddie Harrell33:44
I think for me, one thing that Kevin and I did: we didn't barricade ourselves with assumptions. We didn't lay out assumptions. In our first initial conversation, we made zero assumptions about whether people would be willing to participate or not. We could have spent a lot of time selecting people based on assumptions about how they're going to feel about this. So we really operated with the assumption that people will say yes, as opposed to no. The spirit in which we engaged our partners was a reason why we were able to get the quick 'yes.' We said, 'Here's what we're looking to do,' and we sort of set out what the goal was. They had the opportunity to say no, but they said yes really quickly because we approached them with the assumption that we believe this is the right thing to do. Getting the 'yes' from everybody was actually the quickest thing we accomplished. That allowed us to spend more time on the content and all the technical things that needed to happen. So point one: we did not have assumptions that were counter to the narrative we were trying to accomplish. That was a big deal. Then, once the group said yes, we quickly decided what we were all in it for, as opposed to what we were against. It was all about the momentum of what we were trying to accomplish, not what the barriers were. We never talked about the technical issues. Our engineers are probably upset with us because we cooked up the ideas and then brought in engineers and said, 'We need you to pull this off.' But they said, 'Yes, we can do this,' and they got it done because we operated with what we can do versus what we can't do. To me, that was the biggest takeaway: even with this difficult topic, we operated without putting up barriers that were from our own lens and biases right up front, because that would have been counterproductive.
K
Kevin Griffin36:05,
Yeah, I think the art of the possible was the mindset that we all went into. I probably do this too often, but give me kind of four things that I'd say: Number one, the relationships you have and reputation are critical. Everyone here really trusted each other. I know I've said that too often, but that was key to this entire thing. Number two, we did what we did best. Whoever had an area of skill, within that area they could help, that's what they did best for us. We recognized that quickly. Eddie might do one thing and I might do something else, or Sam or Keith handled things in different ways. We trusted each person to get that done. No one cared about credit. We checked the egos at the door. That was really important. No one had to know who was involved. We just wanted to do something good, period, point blank. Then finally, I think we all work in somewhat of a creative process until we understand that creativity and these things are iterative. That gave us some space allotted to, as Eddie mentioned earlier, say, 'We might start here, but throughout this creative process we might end up in a different spot.' As long as we stayed focused on the outcome that we're looking for, we were confident we were going to get it done. All those things added up to a successful collaboration.
E
Eddie Harrell37:24
One thing that Kevin talked about is we checked the egos at the door. We were very intentional about making sure this isn't led by one group or the other. Down to the fact that we intentionally were thinking of doing this in a studio, and regardless of whose studio we were going to do it at—if you see all the interviews, you see mic flags with a particular station's name. If it was going to be at my station, we were going to take the mic flags down because this was not a branding opportunity for any of our stations. Little things like that. Or when we did the press release, there was a joint statement, not a statement by any one of us. It was a joint statement because we wanted to make sure it didn't look like a Radio One event and others were pulled along, or an iHeart event and the others were pulled along. This was a real collaboration to the height of that word. We were very intentional to make sure that we were all rowing in the same direction and there was no one group taking credit over the other. I think that was something we established pretty quickly that was important to all of us when we agreed to do this: that we were equal partners in this.
R
Rachel38:42
So as we begin to look ahead and as you consider the move to action, what can that look like and what can this audience do to support that?
K
Kevin Griffin38:52
Having you... you can take that one first.
E
Eddie Harrell38:58
Sure. We have a lot of work to do, but I think it starts with something I'll continue to reference my time with Leadership Cleveland: trying to approach things with an appreciative inquiry mindset. Let's look at what's going well and where we can build on. Where are there centers of excellence? What is going well? Once we kind of agree to that and settle down, then we can find out where there are opportunities for us to improve. In an ideal world, how would we map back to all the things we need to do here in Northeast Ohio, specifically in Cleveland, in order to make this the greatest city in America? I mean that with all my heart. If we can do that, leveraging all the skills of all of our people, every single person, then I think we have a good place to start. I'm curious to know, and I know this is really difficult, when and how and who will allow us to lay that framework. As soon as we do that, then this can be, for me, it's all about where I live and it's about Cleveland. That's what I'm focused on right now: making this a great city. I don't know how to get there, but I know that we can continue to have these conversations. I try to myself listen to different points of view all the time. When we do that, it allows you to understand what you need to undo for those people that might not think the same way that you do. Broaden your perspective, and it helps you understand the world way bigger than just your own perspective. I hope we can continue to do that in a very systematic way for everyone here.
Most importantly, I think it's critical that we, as leaders on this call, acknowledge that systemic racism and inequities do exist. That's the starting point. Because if we can't acknowledge that, progress will be slower than it should be. For the leaders on this call, if there is anybody that doesn't believe that, then perhaps you need to spend some time with somebody or an organization to help you realize that it does exist. If you're in a leadership role and you don't think that exists, then you at some point will be part of the problem and part of the road bumping the way to progress. We have to first start with that premise: there are systemic issues to deal with. Number one, once you acknowledge that, then you can be part of the solution by challenging some of the things that you see in your own organization. If you're a publicly traded company, what does your board look like? Let's start with that. If your board has zero diversity, then the question would be why. Or your executive leadership ranks: if the only person of color is your Chief Diversity Officer, that's a problem. Those are real conversations that I've had with some of my colleagues over the past month. Those are very real and honest questions that need to be asked. Once you address that, then you can say, 'Okay, we recognize that's an issue. Now what are we going to do about it?' Because action has to start. Whether that's mentorship programs in your company, or you change the way you look at recruiting because many in our industry will say, 'There's a problem getting African Americans to do this.' Well, maybe we need to approach how we train and recruit. Those are the things that I think we've laid out there and will continue to lay out. This is not an overnight win or success. It's going to take a lot of you on this call to be willing to have the uncomfortable conversations, to push things forward. At the end of the day, we're all in businesses some kind of way, and diversity is great for business. There are studies and data that suggest diversity is great for business. I think we're all interested in doing better in our respective businesses.
R
Rachel43:37
I want to thank you both for sharing your insights today. To wrap up, I want to share a comment that was shared in the chat box a little earlier from Jill. She listened and watched and just wants to say how meaningful and engaged she found the presentation and the conversation. Thank you both and your teams and partners for making it happen. With that, I'm going to turn it back to Marion.
M
Marion43:56
Thanks, Rachel. I will echo Jill's sentiments. It was a great coming together in collaboration on so many levels, and kudos to you for making it happen. I think you have folks on this call who are willing to take the next step forward with you to realize some change taking place in Cleveland. So thanks for starting everything moving in that direction.