Rusty Yeager9:35
Yeah, it's a really neat story. About 2009, the HITECH Act was in the offing, and we started thinking: 90% of our patients come from an acute care hospital, so they're going to have an expectation at some point that we're starting to do interoperability. This was before interoperability was really in the headlines, but we knew that would be something. The prescient leadership of the organization knew we needed to do some of that. Having done that in my past career in the Air Force, meaning rolling out EMRs, I was pretty scared. I was thinking, 'We're going to roll out an EMR to this many hospitals?' At that time we had 98. So I had some trepidation about that, but I also reflected it as something we needed to do. The organization did an RFP; we had several folks respond. We tabled it for a little while, then got back to it. There were three folks that were interested. Ultimately, we decided on Cerner because they had some experience in inpatient rehabilitation with what used to be called the Rehab Institute of Chicago. That was interesting to us because, as I mentioned earlier, things aren't off the shelf for us. We knew we were going to need to do a lot of customization and configuration to meet our particular requirements. So we went with Cerner, and we call it Advancing Clinical Excellence Through IT—ACET. That's been a really good rallying point for the team; we're acing it. We rolled out to a de novo hospital that we built in Northern Virginia in June of 2010, and it went pretty smooth. Then we rolled out to two more de novo hospitals; it went pretty smooth as well. We were feeling pretty sporty about it. This is a new hospital, a lot of our team members are new to inpatient rehabilitation, and it was working pretty good. Then about 18 months later, we went to our first existing hospital. We went out to a hospital in Phoenix, Arizona, that had a really great CEO and began our implementation there. We hit some challenges. We've got a hospital that's been in existence for 20-something years, and they know inpatient rehabilitation better than a de novo hospital. My small team of clinicians know, and they've got workflows that have been in existence for years. That is very typical on the acute care side but less typical for us at that particular time. So we began working with them, and I got a call one day: 'Rusty, you need to come out here.' The CEO of that hospital was a friend of mine. I said okay, I'm out there. When I got out there, we had some challenges. We got together, and I said, 'We've got to get together here.' I got the hospital clinical team and my clinical team together, and we came to an understanding that we're all in the boat together, and we're going to be listening and build this thing for you guys. We did that, and it went over well. Then about 18 months or two years later, we decided to go enterprise-wide. Over that time, we had 98 hospitals. We planned on a five-year rollout because that was our ability to pay for the EMR as well as the change that was happening to the whole organization. We went on schedule, on time, and on budget, and it was working out well. Then we started thinking, 'We've got this bolus of data that nobody else has. What can we do with that?' I sat in a meeting with one of our senior VPs, and he said, 'If we could just affect this acute care transfer ratio, that would be nice. It would be great for the patient and great for the company in terms of our outcomes. What do you think we can do?' I'm thinking to myself, 'We've got all this data. Why don't we mine this data and see what the things are that people can't see but the data can see?' We approached Cerner about it. They were interested; they had the data scientists. We didn't have data scientists; we had the clinicians that know rehab very well. Let's put them together. They ended up building an algorithm we call REACT—Reducing Acute Care Transfers. Acute care transfers are not a good thing for us or for the patient. We went after that mission. We spent probably 18 months crafting this, then rolled it out, and we've been running it ever since. It has had a great impact on those acute care transfers. The beautiful thing is, with the number of patients we discharge a year, if we can affect 1% of that, that's a lot of people. At the time, it was probably 1,500 people; now it would be 2,000 people. That was our first real great outcome from using the EMR. We put it in these hospitals that were completely paper, with the exception of an older pharmacy system. In 10 weeks, they went from paper to one morning they walked in and it was completely electronic. Then a year or two later, they were getting workflow observations about a patient's condition that would have been hard for them to see even in an EMR, much less a paper-based record. So it was really about process: standardize the process, which Encompass Health has done really well, then automate that process, then we can scale it. Once we scale it, we can get data at scale, and then we can use our clinical and business knowledge to infect process improvement. The best thing about that has been that we're able to build it into the workflow so it becomes natural. This is just how we do it, like that old disco song: 'This is how we do it,' and we do it that way everywhere. We've got a single database; all we really change is configuration issues. So we can report business and clinical measures every day across that whole continuum of hospitals and episodes of care, and drill into each of those with a system we built called Beacon, which is essentially a BI system that has worked well to mine the Cerner data to give us visibility into what is happening everywhere.