Marne Jones20:12
So I would consider Dyno Nobel on the industrial side. Large commercial would be some of that data center that we're seeing. You know, as Microsoft joined us, it really has been a significant increase on the load. And Microsoft as an example, again as we get to talk about energy transition, Microsoft is a customer who has very, very lofty greenhouse gas goals. I want to say by 2030 they want to be net zero, and by 2035 they want to be zero every minute of every day. So significant goals. And we think about how do we best serve them today? They buy most of their energy off the market, so it's not all tagged, all the electrons are not tagged, but that is ultimately the goal to be fully renewable.
All right, so going into energy transition. Anything else about Black Hills before we kind of jump into the transition? So ESG. ESG really has been around for decades, and I think it continues to really focus on the ebbs and flows of where our nation is and where the world is from an environmental, social, and governance perspective. You'll see over the course of time there's been different focus points. I would say in the last five to seven years, maybe even a little bit longer, you've seen a really big focus on the environmental side of ESG. But ultimately it is a package. It's about doing business ethically, making good business decisions for our employees, for our customers, for our communities. So we do focus on this. We've also seen increased compliance reporting. There's lots of measuring sticks out there that we need to comply with, but ultimately it's about are we a good business partner. And so we've put a good focus on the ESG side of this, obviously as we think about our footprint. It becomes really a fine kind of needle to weave through all of the politics and really the assets that we have as we think about the ESG. So what is it for us? You know, environmental, it really is about the safe, reliable, cost-effective energy that we serve our customers. We want to continue to make sure those are balanced. And as I think about what others are doing, you know, saying, hey, we're going to close down fossil fuel, we're going to go 100% renewable, what a grand opportunity. But what does that mean to customers? Where are we at with our reliability? Where are we at with our cost effectiveness? And that's one thing for me, I want to make sure we continue to balance those three things. It's really important to be that good energy partner that we balance that. From the social side of it, we want to put people first. So that's our employees, our customers, our communities. As we make decisions, we want to make sure we're very centralized around the people. Without our teams, without our customers, we don't exist as a business and an organization. So it's important for us that we have the opportunity to make decisions that are focused on our employees. And just recently I had the opportunity to take on our safety department for the enterprise. So safety is also a significant focus as you think about what we do each and every day. The majority of our teams are out in the fields, they're working on the wires, the poles, they're working on the pipes. And as those come up, we want to make sure that safety culture is the highest priority for us. We're focused on diversity. We want to make sure that we look like the communities we serve, which is hard to do when you talk about some of the field, and how do we make sure that we're getting diversity in the door because we make better decisions and we're a better organization when we have that level of diversity. And then governance, how do we have processes and principles in place that we can execute that really are the backbone of our ability to be sustainable? You know, do we say what we're going to do and then do we do what we say? I think that's really key, and really a short way to say that compliance on the back end, that governance on the back end, is absolutely key to our success. And as I mentioned, there are organizations, Sustainalytics is one, Glass Lewis others, that are measuring ESG for organizations. It's become a very big piece for investors and how they think about whether or not they want to invest in your organization. Not just utilities, every organization that's publicly traded, big focus on how are you measuring up. And not just, there's not a fixed line in the sand to say when you hit this point you've won and you're green and away you go. It's a continuous movement of ESG and how are you comparing to other industries, how are you comparing to other publicly traded utilities or publicly traded companies. So the bar keeps moving, which gives us again additional opportunity to make sure that we're staying in tune with what's going on around us.
So this is our, these are our goals. This is our greenhouse gas reduction goals. I want to start on the gas side. So we've said, just recently last year we put out a goal that says we want to be net zero by 2035. And what does that mean? Basically we want to make sure that we've got about, as I mentioned, we've got about 30,000 miles of distribution line on our gas side of our business. About 10% of that is vintage pipe or it's uncoated steel, bare steel. So we want to make sure, so that's 3,000 miles of pipe, we want to make sure that we're replacing. On top of that, we want to increase our ability to have leak detection. So there's all sorts of emerging technologies from satellite visions, etc., to say how do you find leaks quicker and make sure that we're taking care of them. Our other piece of really emissions comes from third-party damages. So people planting a tree, they're hitting the pipe and creating a damage to our system, vehicle accidents will hit some equipment and cause damage. So continuing to work through both from the legislative side as well as our policies and practices of how do we reduce third-party damages to our system. And ultimately, is there a carbon or is there a market that we may have to buy some type of credits on to ultimately get there? But our main focus is preserving our system and making it as safe and reliable as we possibly can. So net zero by 2035. We've also joined a coalition called One Future. It's really a group of utilities and others in the industry focused on how do we make sure that we have that resiliency of our system and safety and reliability. So we're part of that coalition, which we continue to say is a great way to collaborate and share what we're finding. It's really for the greater good of the natural gas industry. So it's a big focus for us. On the electric side of the business, we use a baseline of 2005. So everything we're measuring is from 2005. So in 2021, we calculated really a 33% reduction on the electric side of our business with a goal of 40% by 2030 and 70% by 2040. How do you do that? So we want to again, we want to make sure that we're focusing on reliability, the cost effectiveness of our energy, and safety at all times. And so what does it look like to make this transition? We have through our long-term planning, which we'll go through in the next slide, identified the opportunity to convert one of our coal facilities, one of our older coal facilities in Gillette, into natural gas. And then we had a couple of storms. We said, is conversion to a single fuel source, which we no longer have control over because it's not just whether or not you can get the gas price, but it's really can you get the gas delivered? So creates additional risk to our system. So we've done additional analysis and said we really want to convert that to dual fuel. So we want to keep its ability to burn coal, we want to add its ability to burn natural gas. And I'm not an engineer by trade, obviously, but as you look at it, you can burn both fuels at the same time, you can transition between the two fuels in fairly quick turnaround. So really valuable asset and the flexibility. And I think that's what's really important about where we live and the footprint that we serve. It's cold, right? We need energy all of the time. And I think we've come to just rely on when you turn that switch, when you do anything, it just works. And it's important for us that that flexibility is key. And so dual fuel again, we think about the coal, we think about the control we hope we have over that and making sure that that product is delivered. Natural gas is a little different, and as we're continuing to see constraints on the natural gas system, we wanted to make sure that we have that agility with the dual fuel. Now where does the EPA come into this? As you all know, there are regulations that are coming out. We got a little bit of relief. They gave some regulations out here, gosh, late last year. Wyoming has a little bit more time before we have our full response on those, but we're continuing to again kind of weave that very fine thread of meeting our goals and meeting our customers' needs. So we'll continue to focus on that. And then by 2040, really looking at what, where does technology take us? Is it carbon capture? Is it the burning of hydrogen? What else is there that will help us? Maybe we keep those coal facilities running, but maybe they're burning off as something else, or maybe we're capturing the environmental toxins that are going in. So it's not for us about closing things down as much as how do we utilize our assets in the new environment and ensuring that we can continue to reduce our greenhouse gases. You'll see a lot of organizations have their goals set out, they have an asterisk behind them. They're very lofty goals and they have an asterisk and it says when technology comes, we will do this. That's something we're proud of at Black Hills, that we don't have the asterisk. That's not our focus. Our focus is to make sure that we're doing what we have today and we're looking at the long-term viability and flexibility of the assets we own. A couple reasons for that too. One, we have a great set of assets, but two, we have a great employee base that knows our assets well. They have a tremendous amount of expertise. We want to make sure we're continuing with that value chain.
So we, on the electric side of the business, we look out about every three to four years. We're responsible for looking out to say how are we going to best serve our customers from a generation perspective in the long term. And why long term? If you think about building or constructing new generation, it can be anywhere from, I'm going to say four to five year process all the way out to 12 to 15 years as you talk about nuclear. So if you're not ahead of the game, you're too late as you talk about permitting, supply chain, financing, all of that that needs to go into a new construction. And so every three to four years we are responsible for putting in front of our utility commissioners really our long-term plan. Out of that plan, so we filed in South Dakota, Wyoming in the 2021 time frame, and Colorado in our 2022 time frame. Both have come to conclusion, and what is determined in Colorado that we'll be adding 400 megawatts of renewable energy. So we are in Colorado, we serve our customers with natural gas and renewables today. Those are our two sources of energy, and we're going to add additional renewable energy there for a total of 400 megawatts. Colorado has by statute, you've got to be 80% by 2030 on a greenhouse gas perspective reduction. So big push on that. So what does that mean? If you think about a natural gas-fired generator, you're talking availability in the high 90s, right? So you turn it on and it's going to flow as long as you've got gas and your equipment's working. If you think about renewables, and it's going to vary by location and very slightly by your technology, but you're talking more in the 25 to maybe 45% range. So that's the reason for the 400 megawatts. You need those electrons. If you were to construct just a fossil fuel, you're going to need about half of that or less because of when it's available, right? We don't control when the sun comes out, we don't control when the wind blows. And so that's why you end up adding a tremendous amount of resources to meet the same energy output need. In South Dakota, that's our other option, our other opportunity to add renewables. And again, it's tied into the conversion of our coal-fired generation. How do we make sure we replace those electrons that may or may not be flowing? Again, dual fuel is going to provide us tremendous opportunity to operate that more cost effectively. But in those times, whether it's the EPA coming down to say you're not going to operate it in the summer months, etc., we want to make sure that we've got electrons that can do that, and we want to do that through the addition of 100 megawatts of renewables. Both of those, we want to own as much of those renewables as possible. And why is that? As you think about operating a fleet, you've got coal which can work a little bit with intermittent resources, it's not the perfect source of it, and you've got natural gas which is pretty good at ramping up and down as the wind comes on, they can ramp down, as the wind goes down, they can ramp up. So if we have control over our, the rest of all of this as a whole package, we feel like we're providing a much better cost to our customers in having that ownership and control of those assets. So big focus on we want to own our assets, we want to make sure that we're transitioning in a responsible way.
So what are some other things that we're looking at? So obviously long-term generation needs, but more important is what are some things we can do now to set ourselves up for success as what's happening in the environment, whether it's state regulations, it's federal regulations, what's going to change in our as political parties change. We want to make sure that we're not on our heels, that we're on our toes and we're proactive as we think about what does the future look like given a variety of circumstances that could happen. So hydrogen, it was great this morning to talk to the team here about hydrogen and the things that's going on. We're doing a couple of different projects. One from our coal mine, we shipped a barrel of coal to a research firm at another university and they're looking at to say can we use a chemical process that utilizes coal as a source of heat and really breaks it down into hydrogen and a really clean source of hydrogen. So we're in the midst of that process, looks very promising. We just had a team out there a few weeks ago and came back. I'm not a chemist and what they tried to share was very chemically oriented, but I think there's a lot of great things going on in hydrogen and how would we utilize that as a potential fuel source to our generation and do you ultimately could you run anything through pipeline from a natural gas side of it? We're also looking at what is the right mix of hydrogen into a generating facility. If you've got natural gas today, what is your highest potential of mix in with hydrogen? So we're working on a desktop study. If we can continue to get some funding, we'll be looking at maybe doing a small test pilot in Cheyenne at our natural gas facility in Cheyenne, Wyoming. So lots of great things on the hydrogen side. Where does cost come into play? Where does ability to scale come into play? I think are open questions that we have, but certainly something we want to keep our foot in and again use our expertise and our assets to help develop some of these areas. As a utility, R&D is not going to be our highest and best use because who pays for that? And that's every customer, and that may not necessarily be what they want and certainly may not be what our regulators want. But as we think about our diversity of assets and the diversity of our expertise, that's where we really want to focus. Carbon capture, as you are all aware, we've got House Bill 200 in Wyoming requiring carbon capture by 2030. So looking at that to say where does it best fit into this mix, how do we make this cost effective? And between the IIJA and IRA that came out here over the last couple of years, we think there's opportunities for grants to help move some of this technology along. Also want to make sure that we're thinking about it from a new fleet perspective. As we're bringing on new generation, is this an opportunity to do it really from the get-go? And the reason being is you look at some of our coal facilities, the last coal facility that we brought into service was in 2010. So coal in general is going to have a life of anywhere between 35 to maybe 45 years. Some of those are starting to reach a bit, they're getting more mature, how about that, we'll call it more mature now. You can still run them and you can still operate them beyond that 35-year time frame, but you're going to have to do some overhauls, some maybe some major construction to that. And is that where we want to put the financing for a carbon capture? Again, still more work to do and we certainly see it as an opportunity. We want to continue to focus on understanding that as well as for any new generation we bring on, what an opportunity if you can bring generation on that already has that as part of it. Clean energy ventures, this is really a natural gas and speaking, you know, really trying to defend the natural gas business. This is just an opportunity for some additional R&D, looking for ways to reduce the footprint of carbon out of natural gas, the ways that we can find best resources to mix with natural gas. If you were to do it with hydrogen, what does this look like for transport, what does this look like for our assets? We've got billions of dollars of assets and pipes, you may want to make sure that we preserve those with whatever type of emerging technology we may flow through those pipes. And then we're looking at batteries. We just issued a grant application for a battery, a lithium-ion. We're looking at this consortium here at the top that I mentioned is really a solid-state battery and looking at both short and long-term duration. You look at batteries today, most of them are four hours. Four hours isn't necessarily going to get you through a Winter Storm URI or an Elliott for that matter. And so four hours is not there, that is our best battery source today. There are some that are longer duration, but what are some other opportunities? And you think about the minerals that go into making batteries, are they viable, can we get them for the long term, are they cost effective? So lots of research on batteries. We want to make sure again that we're having that opportunity to say is it really part of our distribution system, is it part of our transmission, what's the best use of a battery, and what's the best type of battery that would really solve some of the gap as we think about that transition that's happening and how do we bridge what needs to happen to keep the energy flowing and still meet our renewable expectations, our greenhouse gas expectations?
And finally, this is a slide that I grabbed from EPRI, their Research Institute. I just thought it was interesting to look at the transition of technology. If you look at this, things that have met commercialization, you'll see that from concept to commercialization, running around that 45 years. Advanced nuclear reactors, you'll see at the top there in the beginning phases. Hydrogen, carbon capture. This is 45 years. The reality, and I think that's the question we ask ourselves, if we put the focus where it needs to be, put it in the right places, kind of get people rowing in the same direction, I think there's some real opportunity for us. You know, advanced nuclear reactors, as you all know, there's a project here in Wyoming to add nuclear. I know there was some legislation in South Dakota trying to support nuclear. I think it is part of our future, but it's not where it needs to be. And so that transition of fossil fuels to renewables is really key. There has to be some form of bridge to meet that future expectation. And I think nuclear is part of the future, but if it's where it really shows on here, we've got a ways to go and we've got to do something in between. So what are opportunities? And that's really important for us again because we're focused on that reliability and making sure that people can afford it at the end of the day. I can't determine what they can afford, but as long as I feel like I'm making the most cost-effective decisions, that's what's going to be important. And keeping the lights on, no one wants to pay when we can't keep the lights on. Any questions on this or insights? You guys probably have much more from the insight perspective than me on some of these emerging technologies.