Ather Williams III18:27
I'm happy you describe it that way because it's validating for me. So when I sit down with my team, whenever I take over a new team or new organization, I start with a basic, a placemat that's founded around a thing called 'the way forward.' It's like, 'This is how we're all going forward together.' And it gets to not the rules to your point, but I'll use your term, the norms of how we're going to operate. If you're at the table, you're here for a reason. Have a voice. If you're not going to have a voice, don't be at the table. You know, there's also things about the creative conflict. We're going to disagree. We need to do that openly. There's no meeting after the meeting. And then when we leave this room, we're going to stack hands and commit because, you know, unfortunately or not, this is not a democracy. We're going to make a decision and we're all going to line up behind it, but we're not going to have passive aggressive behavior. And so there's, you know, and I use that under the analogy of, you know, a fist is stronger than five fingers. And so there's things that I think that we have to do to wind people up to say, 'Look, this is how we're going to work. If you don't want to do this, opt out now.' In a past life and now with this integration and I've done 34 acquisitions and integrations, it's taken me a while to get to this, but I have a 'no jerks' rule because we had a dysfunctional leadership team, in a previous organization where if you have somebody who's not exhibiting exactly, you and I think exactly alike on this in terms of how those meetings should go, it really is incredibly unproductive. And the thing you have to remember, in a big organization, what happens with the ten or so people that, say they're in a key staff meeting, a decision meeting with you, each of them have five, eight, 10 reports and it goes down. So you're turning these gears that end up spinning very, very quickly for the men and women on the front line. And so when you've got a lack of productivity here, it's incredibly detrimental there. And so, like you, if you're at the table, you have to speak up, you have to share your perspective. And it has to be the 'no jerks' rule. What that does is lets people be comfortable with dissent. Because when I disagree with you, I'm not disagreeing with you personally. I'm not bringing an edge to this. I'm not doing it in a disparaging manner. And there's trust and respect. And then I always take input from the key leaders. And back to your fist analogy, we make that decision, we stack hands, and we go execute it. When you have jerks or passive aggressive folks, they're not along and they're like, 'Oh, you wouldn't believe the meeting we had today. Don't worry about that initiative. We're not really going to push it down here in this geography.' Can't have it. You cannot run a company in that fashion.
So I think back to the point you made early on in this conversation, you were talking about your platoon sergeant. And so I think that the thing that struck me when you were telling that story was at a very young age, you realized one of the key things I think of leadership is you made yourself vulnerable. You're like, 'Hey, I know I've got, I outrank you, but I need you to help me be a better me,' which a lot of people don't have the courage to do. So I applaud you for at a very young age, understanding that and embracing that.