Randy Martin8:33
Well, you know, in my mind, what does marriage equality really about? It's really about us as a people saying that we're going to protect certain relationships. And for me as a psychotherapist, you know, one of the core needs of human beings is intimate, authentic relationships. We need as much as we need oxygen for our survival, for our physical and emotional, our mental survival. To be healthy people, we have to have healthy connections. That's family, that's friends, and for most people, not everybody chooses to have an intimate romantic sexual relationship. And what we're saying is that we recognize that as an inalienable right. And then everything that we add to it, as you know, the United States, all the protections in terms of legal and financial and all those other sort of things, but what we're really doing is we're saying we recognize that this is a fundamental human right and we're going to protect that. Now, when you're talking about relationships, and this is specifically to Josh, you're talking about with our people, not Josh, with Chris, with Christopher Lee. Well, those are the personality names. Thank you for that clarification. So many people, so much of what their psychotherapy is about is about relationships. We may come in, people may come in with a job issue or they may come in with difficult decisions, career decisions, never know, but it always ends up being a relationship issue. A relationship with self and a relationship with others. And so many people come in with those romantic relationship issues. But to be able to live in a society where there isn't the hiding, there isn't the filtering of language and look and how you stand and who you stand with and all that sort of stuff, allow somebody to live free, not to live in freedom. I mean, I think I've talked about earlier, living in solitary confinement. If you watch what happens in movies and so forth, when somebody lives in solitary confinement, they break down physically and mentally. They break down. Call that depression, call it anxiety, call it any other number of diagnoses. It's not good for us. And so what we're really saying is that we're going to protect that right. And so I think when people see this on the federal level, on the state level, it gives hope that I can live an authentic life and get my basic need for interaction and relationship met. So it offers some hope, even if it takes a while to move from paper to actual experience in any one place, any one neighborhood, rural or urban, and work environments and so forth. But it says at least from the legal perspective, we're going to protect you. At the forefront of protecting our rights have been actually corporations. They don't want to deal with these issues, I think mostly, which is the best reason for them to protect all of their employees. Look, the two of you can't fight about it. He is what he is, the other one is what he is, and you're both protected, and that's just not an issue here. But when you're hearing it from the government, that's taking it to a different level because if the government has actually discriminated in the past and now the government is saying we don't do that, right? And I think people get that message, don't you?