Richard Swartz4:52
Okay. So as Alison read, my background is as a family therapist, so I was steeped in systems thinking. I was actually one of those obnoxious family therapists that thought we'd found the holy grail and that people who were mucking around in the intrapsychic world were wasting their time because we could change all that by just changing some external relationships. I held that belief until I tested it, made the mistake of doing an outcome study, and found that I could reorganize the families just the way the books said to do it, and still these bulimic clients we were doing this with kept binging and purging. So out of frustration I began asking why, and they started talking this language of parts, which was foreign to me at the time because I thought I just have one mind and a bunch of different thoughts and emotions. But they were talking about these parts as if they had a lot of autonomy and could make them do things they didn't want to do and would get into fights with each other. At first I got scared and thought maybe these kids are sicker than I thought, until I really listed inside myself and thought, oh my god, I've got them too, and mine are very similar in some ways. Then I got intrigued and began to quiz my clients about their inner systems. I was lucky to have a few incredibly articulate about it, and they taught this to me. I basically learned this model from my clients.
What I learned, and I'm going to skip through a bunch of the mistakes and the phases, but mainly what I learned is that number one, we all have these parts. It's the natural state of the mind to have parts, to be subdivided this way. I liked your initial picture because it looks like a bunch of cogs in a machine, which the word part does kind of conjure, but it's inadequate because what I found with the parts is that they are full-range personalities. People who have the diagnosis of multiple personality disorder, now called DID, aren't so different from the rest of us except that their system got blown apart such that they have these amnesic barriers between these different parts. But the idea that they're full-range personalities is pretty much the same, and that is a different paradigm from the way most of us have thought about ourselves. But it turns out to be a very empowering paradigm because all of them have wonderful qualities and resources to lend to us and to help us thrive in our lives. Trauma and attachment injuries, bad parenting, forces them out of their naturally valuable states into roles that can be extreme, and they are also frozen in time during the trauma. So they still think you, Allison, are five years old and they have to protect you in the way that they did back then. In that state they can actually be quite damaging in our lives. A lot of the work is just helping clients focus on them, and instead of the usual fighting with them or trying to get rid of them or allowing them to take over and do something destructive, just get curious and begin to ask them questions. To most everybody's amazement, the answers start coming, and you'll learn about the secret history of how whatever part it is got forced into the role it's in and doesn't like that role but thinks it's absolutely necessary because something tragic would happen if it didn't keep doing this.
So that's what I learned from these clients, and I also learned that they tend to organize across clients in similar ways. As a systems guy, I began trying to figure out what are the distinctions and the patterns here. The main distinction that leaped out immediately was between parts that you might call your inner children. Before they get hurt, they are playful and creative and loving and open and vulnerable and sensitive. Because they are so sensitive, they're the ones who get hurt the most by the betrayals or the swings and arrows. They take in what I'm going to call burdens, which are extreme beliefs and emotions that entered your system from those experiences. These extreme beliefs and emotions attach to these parts almost like a virus. After one of these inner children gets burdened that way, their whole organization is around that extreme belief or emotion. They operate with that, and then they have the power to make us feel, even years later, that same emotion and can overwhelm us if they feel the need to, making it so we can't function. Most of us, after being traumatized or having a bad experience, will try to lock those parts away inside, in inner basements or abysses or cysts, and desperately avoid anything that might trigger them. So we call those parts the exiles, because inside they are exiles. You moved on from them, thinking all you were doing was moving on from the memories, sensations, emotions, and beliefs of the trauma, not realizing in the process you were locking away your most precious qualities a lot of the time. Then you become dominated by another set of parts who are desperately trying to keep these exiles from being hurt or triggered and also keep them contained. We call those parts protectors. I'm just talking about the roles they're forced into, not the essence of who these parts are. Some protectors are trying to manage your life so that nothing happens that might trigger your exile. They might manage your relationships so no one gets close enough to hurt you, manage your appearance so you never get rejected, manage your performance so you get a lot of accolades to counter the worthlessness. They're working constantly. They're the ones that got you your good jobs, got you through graduate school. They're in your head a lot of the time, keeping you from feeling too much by keeping you in your head. So we call these managers. Some of them, particularly in women and people in my profession, make you take care of everybody else and not take care of yourself. They're just trying to keep you safe and keep these exiles from being triggered. Despite their best intentions, the world has a way of triggering your exiles anyway, which is a big crisis or emergency. So another set of parts immediately goes into action to get you higher than those flames of raw emotion from the exiles, or to douse them with some substance, or to distract you until they burn themselves out. So we call those protectors firefighters. It's a very simple map. It's really just three classes of parts: exiles, and then two kinds of protectors, managers and firefighters. Again, these are the extreme roles the parts are forced into, not who they become when they leave these roles, because they can. When they do leave the roles, they'll transform into their naturally valuable states. So that's a lot of what IFS is about: helping people not just notice and observe in a mindful way and be accepting of these parts, but actively starting to help them transform.
I stumbled onto another big discovery through trial and error. As a family therapist, I was trying to have my clients have better dialogues with these parts once I got hip to the fact that they're not what they seem and they deserve to be listened to. I was trying to get my clients to listen to them and be curious about them. As I was doing that, I would find that a client would suddenly become furious with the part. For example, if I was trying to have Allison talk to her critic, she might start out okay but suddenly she's angry at the critic, the critic gets defensive, and they're fighting. As a family therapist, in family sessions when you try to have two people talk to each other and one of them gets extreme, sometimes they're being cued from somebody else, a third party that disagrees with the other person or is siding against them. We were taught to get that third party to step back in the room, out of the person's line of vision, and when that happens they would calm down and have a decent conversation. I started thinking maybe the same thing is happening in this inner world. As I'm trying to have my client talk to the critic, maybe some part that hates the critic has come in. So I would ask clients to get those parts to step out, and as they did, they suddenly would become a different person. That person would know how to relate to the critic or any other part from a place of compassion, curiosity, calm, and confidence. The part would respond and soften and start to tell its story and how it was forced into the role it was in, and also about the other parts in the system that it was protecting. As we got that information, we could negotiate permission to go to the exile it was protecting. Then I learned over time about a five-step process for literally healing the exile, which then freed up that protector to no longer have to do that job. So that's a very nutshell version of both the theory and the practice. But I do want to save time to do a demonstration of some of that with Allison. Sound okay?