Back
Richard Swartz
President, Chief Executive Officer & Director, MYR GROUP INC

Coaching the Client's Self Rather Than Their Parts with Richard Schwartz | Heal The Divide Podinar

🎥 Aug 02, 2021 📺 Learning In Action ⏱ 62m 👁 42980 views
... Richard Schwartz, Ph.D. IFS has become a widely-used form of psychotherapy that is increasingly being applied to coaching.
Watch on YouTube

About Richard Swartz

Richard Schwartz, the developer of the Internal Family Systems (IFS) model of psychotherapy, has been active in discussing and promoting the model through various interviews and webinars. In a 2021 interview, Schwartz described the IFS model as one that posits the mind is not unitary but contains multiple "parts," and that everyone has an "undamageable, intact self" which, when accessed, possesses qualities like calm, curiosity, compassion, and courage. He stated that the model is "a model of total utter compassion for everything inside of you," and that learning to love one's own parts can change how one interacts with others. Schwartz also discussed the importance of respecting "protective parts" during therapy, noting that he learned this lesson after clients experienced negative reactions when he bypassed these parts to work directly with vulnerable "exiles." In a 2020 webinar, Schwartz applied the IFS framework to societal and global issues, particularly the COVID-19 pandemic. He described the pandemic as a "wake-up call" that could force individuals and societies to reconsider their values, and he compared the "unrestrained growth" driven by "striving parts" in individuals to the economic models of many countries. Schwartz stated that the pandemic has caused immense pain but also offered an opportunity for healing, and he argued that the more "self" people bring to the crisis, the more likely its lessons will be learned. Separately, in a 2019 customer spotlight, Schwartz discussed a successful digital marketing campaign for a retail sale, noting that it brought in 1,200 leads at a cost of about one dollar per lead and that the campaign was being rolled out for future events.

Source: AI-verified profile updated from Richard Swartz's recent appearances. Browse all interviews →

Transcript (118 segments)
A
Allison Wittmeyer0:00
Welcome to Learning in Action's Heal the Divide Pognar series. Today our theme is coaching the client itself rather than their parts, and our guest is Dr. Richard Schwartz, who I'll give a proper introduction to in just a moment. Hi, I'm Allison Wittmeyer with Learning in Action, joined by my colleague Sarah Bush. Hey Sarah.
Great to be here. So our mission at Learning in Action is to heal the divide. In an IFS framework, it's about healing the ways in which we're divided from our self, healing the ways in which the parts are running the bus, and reconnecting with the self, because our belief is that when we can be self-led, we will heal what divides us from each other. So what the heck is a Pognar? It's a combination of a podcast and a webinar. It's interview style like a podcast, and interactive we hope like a webinar. I'm pleased to talk about what we're going to get into today. Dick is going to be providing an overview of the Internal Family Systems model. That'll be about the first 15 to 20 minutes, it doesn't need any back and forth from me, so that'll be Dick presenting that piece so that we all have a grounding and understanding of what is this that we're talking about. Then we'll probably ask a few questions, mainly to work with the energy and move some energy around, and then we're going to go into a live demonstration of IFS, but with me as the client. So my parts are pretty excited about that. We're going to discuss also how a coach might use some of the aspects of this model in their coaching, talk about what it might mean to coach the client itself rather than their parts and what the effectiveness of that might be, and then explore, you know, many coaches have some discomfort around using what might be called a therapeutic model in a coaching context, so we'll explore some of those potential concerns or challenges. That is our agenda for today. So with that, I'm so excited to introduce Dr. Richard Schwartz.
He began his career as a systemic family therapist and an academic. Grounded in systems thinking, Dr. Schwartz developed Internal Family Systems in response to clients' descriptions of various parts within themselves. He focuses on the relationship among these parts and noticed that there were systemic patterns to the way they were organized across clients. He found that when clients' parts felt safe and were allowed to relax, clients would experience spontaneously the qualities of confidence, openness, and compassion that Dr. Schwartz came to call the self. He found that when in that state of self, clients would know how to heal their parts. A featured speaker for national professional organizations, author of this fabulous new book I hope you'll check out, No Bad Parts, we'll talk more about that later. Dr. Schwartz has published many books and lots of articles about IFS. So without any further ado, that was a lot of ado, welcome.
R
Richard Swartz4:15
Well, thank you. Awesome. I feel very welcome. You're a lovely host. I love how you've created this tight community, you and Sarah. I'm excited to be on and honored. It sounds like you know IFS pretty well. I'm happy to introduce it in the 15 minutes you mentioned. Should I jump in?
A
Allison Wittmeyer4:50
Let's jump in.
R
Richard Swartz4:52
Okay. So as Alison read, my background is as a family therapist, so I was steeped in systems thinking. I was actually one of those obnoxious family therapists that thought we'd found the holy grail and that people who were mucking around in the intrapsychic world were wasting their time because we could change all that by just changing some external relationships. I held that belief until I tested it, made the mistake of doing an outcome study, and found that I could reorganize the families just the way the books said to do it, and still these bulimic clients we were doing this with kept binging and purging. So out of frustration I began asking why, and they started talking this language of parts, which was foreign to me at the time because I thought I just have one mind and a bunch of different thoughts and emotions. But they were talking about these parts as if they had a lot of autonomy and could make them do things they didn't want to do and would get into fights with each other. At first I got scared and thought maybe these kids are sicker than I thought, until I really listed inside myself and thought, oh my god, I've got them too, and mine are very similar in some ways. Then I got intrigued and began to quiz my clients about their inner systems. I was lucky to have a few incredibly articulate about it, and they taught this to me. I basically learned this model from my clients.
What I learned, and I'm going to skip through a bunch of the mistakes and the phases, but mainly what I learned is that number one, we all have these parts. It's the natural state of the mind to have parts, to be subdivided this way. I liked your initial picture because it looks like a bunch of cogs in a machine, which the word part does kind of conjure, but it's inadequate because what I found with the parts is that they are full-range personalities. People who have the diagnosis of multiple personality disorder, now called DID, aren't so different from the rest of us except that their system got blown apart such that they have these amnesic barriers between these different parts. But the idea that they're full-range personalities is pretty much the same, and that is a different paradigm from the way most of us have thought about ourselves. But it turns out to be a very empowering paradigm because all of them have wonderful qualities and resources to lend to us and to help us thrive in our lives. Trauma and attachment injuries, bad parenting, forces them out of their naturally valuable states into roles that can be extreme, and they are also frozen in time during the trauma. So they still think you, Allison, are five years old and they have to protect you in the way that they did back then. In that state they can actually be quite damaging in our lives. A lot of the work is just helping clients focus on them, and instead of the usual fighting with them or trying to get rid of them or allowing them to take over and do something destructive, just get curious and begin to ask them questions. To most everybody's amazement, the answers start coming, and you'll learn about the secret history of how whatever part it is got forced into the role it's in and doesn't like that role but thinks it's absolutely necessary because something tragic would happen if it didn't keep doing this.
So that's what I learned from these clients, and I also learned that they tend to organize across clients in similar ways. As a systems guy, I began trying to figure out what are the distinctions and the patterns here. The main distinction that leaped out immediately was between parts that you might call your inner children. Before they get hurt, they are playful and creative and loving and open and vulnerable and sensitive. Because they are so sensitive, they're the ones who get hurt the most by the betrayals or the swings and arrows. They take in what I'm going to call burdens, which are extreme beliefs and emotions that entered your system from those experiences. These extreme beliefs and emotions attach to these parts almost like a virus. After one of these inner children gets burdened that way, their whole organization is around that extreme belief or emotion. They operate with that, and then they have the power to make us feel, even years later, that same emotion and can overwhelm us if they feel the need to, making it so we can't function. Most of us, after being traumatized or having a bad experience, will try to lock those parts away inside, in inner basements or abysses or cysts, and desperately avoid anything that might trigger them. So we call those parts the exiles, because inside they are exiles. You moved on from them, thinking all you were doing was moving on from the memories, sensations, emotions, and beliefs of the trauma, not realizing in the process you were locking away your most precious qualities a lot of the time. Then you become dominated by another set of parts who are desperately trying to keep these exiles from being hurt or triggered and also keep them contained. We call those parts protectors. I'm just talking about the roles they're forced into, not the essence of who these parts are. Some protectors are trying to manage your life so that nothing happens that might trigger your exile. They might manage your relationships so no one gets close enough to hurt you, manage your appearance so you never get rejected, manage your performance so you get a lot of accolades to counter the worthlessness. They're working constantly. They're the ones that got you your good jobs, got you through graduate school. They're in your head a lot of the time, keeping you from feeling too much by keeping you in your head. So we call these managers. Some of them, particularly in women and people in my profession, make you take care of everybody else and not take care of yourself. They're just trying to keep you safe and keep these exiles from being triggered. Despite their best intentions, the world has a way of triggering your exiles anyway, which is a big crisis or emergency. So another set of parts immediately goes into action to get you higher than those flames of raw emotion from the exiles, or to douse them with some substance, or to distract you until they burn themselves out. So we call those protectors firefighters. It's a very simple map. It's really just three classes of parts: exiles, and then two kinds of protectors, managers and firefighters. Again, these are the extreme roles the parts are forced into, not who they become when they leave these roles, because they can. When they do leave the roles, they'll transform into their naturally valuable states. So that's a lot of what IFS is about: helping people not just notice and observe in a mindful way and be accepting of these parts, but actively starting to help them transform.
I stumbled onto another big discovery through trial and error. As a family therapist, I was trying to have my clients have better dialogues with these parts once I got hip to the fact that they're not what they seem and they deserve to be listened to. I was trying to get my clients to listen to them and be curious about them. As I was doing that, I would find that a client would suddenly become furious with the part. For example, if I was trying to have Allison talk to her critic, she might start out okay but suddenly she's angry at the critic, the critic gets defensive, and they're fighting. As a family therapist, in family sessions when you try to have two people talk to each other and one of them gets extreme, sometimes they're being cued from somebody else, a third party that disagrees with the other person or is siding against them. We were taught to get that third party to step back in the room, out of the person's line of vision, and when that happens they would calm down and have a decent conversation. I started thinking maybe the same thing is happening in this inner world. As I'm trying to have my client talk to the critic, maybe some part that hates the critic has come in. So I would ask clients to get those parts to step out, and as they did, they suddenly would become a different person. That person would know how to relate to the critic or any other part from a place of compassion, curiosity, calm, and confidence. The part would respond and soften and start to tell its story and how it was forced into the role it was in, and also about the other parts in the system that it was protecting. As we got that information, we could negotiate permission to go to the exile it was protecting. Then I learned over time about a five-step process for literally healing the exile, which then freed up that protector to no longer have to do that job. So that's a very nutshell version of both the theory and the practice. But I do want to save time to do a demonstration of some of that with Allison. Sound okay?
A
Allison Wittmeyer16:55
Yeah, that was a super helpful overview. A question came up. I'm really appreciating Michael for doing some quick answers for the group. But one thing I'd love for you to address a little more fully is this question of are our parts created by trauma? I've heard you say before that we come into this life with un-potentiated parts. Could you just speak to the origin of parts?
R
Richard Swartz17:38
That's a really important question because the way you think about how they come has a lot to do with how you relate to them. There is a myth in the trauma world that they are created by trauma, that the unitary mind gets fragmented into these many minds. That means the existence of parts is pathologized. I'm a crusader against that belief. What I not only believe but have found over and over is that we come into the world with them, either dormant or manifest. Infant researchers like Barry Brazelton talk about five discrete states that infants rotate through, so those are the ones online when you're born. As you develop, others come in on time, and they're there to help us in our life. So they're not pathologized. They're valuable. Like kids in a dysfunctional family, they are forced into roles they're not designed for and hate. They become like what we call in family therapy parentified inner children. They're forced to take on responsibility they're not equipped to handle, and others get exiled. That's an important question.
A
Allison Wittmeyer19:11
Even not to get too tangential, but I've heard Stanislav Grof talk about parts in utero.
R
Richard Swartz19:19
Yeah, we've done that kind of retrieval where we've had to go back into the womb and get some parts out of there.
A
Allison Wittmeyer19:40
I feel like how about we go into the demo? I feel like more questions will come up from there. I'm not seeing anything else really major in the chat box. So what I'm going to invite us to do during the demo is to have everyone's camera go off so that I won't feel like I have so many eyes on me. I'm going to fix my camera view so I'm just looking at Dick. A couple of things: I may do some breathing, and that's okay. I might cry, and that's okay too. I've got my hanky. So I'm good. Should we begin? I'm ready.
R
Richard Swartz20:37
Okay. Did you have something in mind to work on, Allison?
A
Allison Wittmeyer20:42
I do. When you and I met the first time and we had this initial conversation, I could feel a really strong part of me going like, get out of there, and found myself kind of rushing. So there's a part there I'd like to start with. I suspect other parts will want to get in on the action.
R
Richard Swartz21:15
Okay, that sounds good. Let's go ahead and focus on that feeling of wanting to get out of there and being pulled. Notice where you find it right now in your body. I can see you're feeling it right now.
A
Allison Wittmeyer21:35
Yeah, right now kind of where I'm feeling it is like that old vaudeville hook, my whole body like that.
R
Richard Swartz21:53
Good. As you notice it there, how do you feel toward it?
A
Allison Wittmeyer22:07
There's another part that's blocking. Don't look there, don't look at the hook, don't look at the person, don't look at them.
R
Richard Swartz22:28
So don't look at me, it's saying? No, don't look at that other part. Okay, got it. So we might want to start with that one that doesn't want you to look. Where do you find it in your body?
A
Allison Wittmeyer22:42
It's in my chest.
R
Richard Swartz22:44
How do you feel toward that part?
A
Allison Wittmeyer22:53
Curious and appreciative because I feel its intention.
R
Richard Swartz23:10
Is it giving you that intention? Ask it what it's trying to protect you from or why it doesn't want you to look.
A
Allison Wittmeyer23:26
This part is protecting me from feeling too much.
R
Richard Swartz23:29
Any particular feeling it's worried about?
A
Allison Wittmeyer23:46
I think it's more afraid of me being overwhelmed, almost overwhelmed by compassion. By the feelings of the other person or another part.
R
Richard Swartz24:17
Does that make sense to you, Allison? It feels very familiar. Ask this one how old it thinks you are. Don't think of the answer, just wait and see what comes.
A
Allison Wittmeyer24:37
It thinks I'm young. It's bigger than me. It thinks it's bigger than me, taller, more powerful.
R
Richard Swartz24:53
How are you feeling toward it as you get that?
A
Allison Wittmeyer24:59
Just appreciative.
R
Richard Swartz25:01
Let it know. It sounds like it's been trying to keep you away from this for a long time.
A
Allison Wittmeyer25:11
Yeah, it's been trying to protect me.
R
Richard Swartz25:19
Do you feel like you need its protection? Is this something you're really afraid to look at or feel?
A
Allison Wittmeyer25:34
No, I think I'm okay.
R
Richard Swartz25:37
Let it know that. Let it know maybe you're older than when it got this job. See how it reacts.
A
Allison Wittmeyer25:51
It's like I just grew, and it's going, oh, oh, okay.
R
Richard Swartz26:02
How would it feel now if we went with the hook?
A
Allison Wittmeyer26:06
It feels okay. It's like, all right, you did something and you got this.
R
Richard Swartz26:19
Return your focus to that hook. How would it feel now to go where it wants you to go? Let it know you're ready, and I'll be right with you. Let's just see where it takes you.
A
Allison Wittmeyer26:52
There's a little girl who is hiding in the corner, and she's the one that pulls the hook.
R
Richard Swartz27:05
How do you feel toward her as you see her there?
A
Allison Wittmeyer27:11
I feel sad for her.
R
Richard Swartz27:17
Let her know that. Do you have a sense of how close you are to her or distant?
A
Allison Wittmeyer27:31
Further than arm's length.
R
Richard Swartz27:33
How is she reacting to your compassion?
A
Allison Wittmeyer27:44
She's still hiding, still scared.
R
Richard Swartz27:57
Right now we're not going to do anything but try to earn some trust with her in whatever way feels right. Just see how you want to do that.
A
Allison Wittmeyer28:12
Sitting down on the floor with her.
R
Richard Swartz28:22
She's looking up. She's ready to talk. Let's see what she wants you to know. By the way, you don't have to share with us what she tells you if you don't want to. It's up to you.
A
Allison Wittmeyer29:19
She feels like she's protecting me from being seen. Somehow it's not safe for other people to see me.
R
Richard Swartz29:41
Are you open to knowing why she carries that fear? Tell her you're ready to know where she got this fear in the past. Don't think of the answer, just wait and see what comes.
A
Allison Wittmeyer30:09
Lots of worry about not being right, not being good enough, not being enough. Not being afraid, but worse than that.
R
Richard Swartz30:47
Is all that making sense to you? Let her know you're getting that there were lots of different scenes and incidents where she got the message that she better not be seen because she'll be judged as not good enough.
A
Allison Wittmeyer31:12
It's worse than that. It's like she wouldn't exist. It's a matter of being annihilated.
R
Richard Swartz31:38
Let her know you get that the fear is that deep and big. Ask a little more about why it felt so much like she might be annihilated.
A
Allison Wittmeyer32:12
Something's blocking.
R
Richard Swartz32:18
We'll respect that. Some part isn't ready for you to know that piece, and given the time we have, we'll respect that. Focus on the block for one second and ask it what it's afraid would happen if you saw the rest of it.
A
Allison Wittmeyer32:48
It's about what else I would have to feel that the little girl feels.
R
Richard Swartz32:59
There's some other feeling it's afraid to let you feel. What's it afraid would happen if you felt that?
A
Allison Wittmeyer33:13
Like it would be too much. It thinks I would not have the capacity to handle it.
R
Richard Swartz33:27
Ask it how old it thinks you are.
A
Allison Wittmeyer33:35
It doesn't know and it doesn't care.
R
Richard Swartz33:43
We're going to respect its pace. But like you did with the other one, let it know who you are, because it may not know, and that you can handle more than it thinks, if that's true.
A
Allison Wittmeyer33:59
It's stepping back.
R
Richard Swartz34:13
This probably isn't the place to take the next step given the time constraints. But let the girl know that you get there's more she needs to share with you, and you're going to find a time to go with her there. See how that is for her.
A
Allison Wittmeyer34:35
She's liking that.
R
Richard Swartz34:44
In the meantime, go into that time period and be with her in the way she needed somebody. Tell me when you're in there with her.
A
Allison Wittmeyer35:00
I'm there.
R
Richard Swartz35:05
How are you being with her?
A
Allison Wittmeyer35:06
I'm holding her.
R
Richard Swartz35:09
How's she reacting?
A
Allison Wittmeyer35:11
She's good.
R
Richard Swartz35:26
If she'd like, we could take her out of that time period to a safe place until you're ready to go back with her and see what else happened. Or she can just stay there. It's her call.
A
Allison Wittmeyer35:40
She's open to being carried somewhere else.
R
Richard Swartz35:46
It could be right there in your house with you, or a fantasy place of her choice.
A
Allison Wittmeyer35:56
She knows where she wants to go.
R
Richard Swartz36:00
Let's take her there.
A
Allison Wittmeyer36:07
We're in a hammock swinging.
R
Richard Swartz36:14
Good. You're there with her. Tell her she doesn't have to go back there until she's ready to show you the rest, and you're going to take care of her this way until then and after.
A
Allison Wittmeyer36:30
She's good with that. I don't necessarily love that corner of the room.
R
Richard Swartz36:43
Let's bring in these protectors and have them see how she's doing now. See if they want to say anything or have any reaction.
A
Allison Wittmeyer36:56
They're good. They're a little surprised and a little embarrassed.
R
Richard Swartz37:04
Embarrassed by what you shared, or what are they embarrassed about?
A
Allison Wittmeyer37:09
Embarrassed that they've been doing all this protection and maybe they didn't need to.
R
Richard Swartz37:15
That's something for them to think about. Ask them if they could really trust they didn't need to do this protection, what might they like to do inside of you instead?
A
Allison Wittmeyer37:34
They're saying they're going to need to get back to me.
R
Richard Swartz37:42
Yeah, they can think about it. You haven't fully healed this little girl yet, so it's likely they won't totally drop their weapons until that's complete. Let them know you get that.
A
Allison Wittmeyer38:05
Does that feel complete for now?
It does. It feels resolved, light and resolved.
R
Richard Swartz38:19
Thank your parts for doing this, especially in this context. Remember you're coming back to a group that you're leading. How do you feel?
A
Allison Wittmeyer38:38
I feel good. I kind of thought I would be disoriented, and I'm not.
R
Richard Swartz38:47
Good, good. I can see in the chat a lot of accolades. I hope you get to read them.
A
Allison Wittmeyer38:58
Yes, everyone can turn your camera back on, please join us if you'd like. If you want to raise your virtual hand, I can imagine you want to let that sit inside you a little bit. If you'd like to reflect a question or curiosity about what happened, go ahead.
A
Audience Member39:24
I found it fascinating. I was listening to some of my parts bringing me information, the same things. My question is, how do we as coaches incorporate IFS into our practice without delving too far into therapy? Really good question.
R
Richard Swartz40:04
That's something we've struggled with. We want to start training coaches in this, and we're in the process of designing a curriculum. Some of where we've landed is that for coaches, it's safe to work with protectors of clients and maybe not go to these inner children, the piece of work that Allison and I just did, without at least consultation from a therapist or some kind of collaboration. While there are lots of people like Allison who you could do what I just did and it would probably be fine, there are also a percentage of people who have pretty severe trauma, and it's good to have some therapeutic training to work with that population. You don't know in advance who is who, so we're going to err on the safe side and encourage coaches to stay with protectors. There's a whole lot you can do just at that level.
A
Allison Wittmeyer41:16
I'll just double down on that. For me, as I've just begun experimenting incorporating this a little bit, simply helping your clients notice their different parts—part of you is feeling this and part of you is feeling that—that alone has value. In my experience, that by itself, not only noticing them but realizing they're not your enemy and actually learning to be loving of them, it's a big shift for most people. The other side of it that I didn't mention is helping your coachees access that self I was talking about. If you're coaching them in a corporate context or life context, knowing how to access those qualities and then living their life much more from that place, noticing when parts come in and interfere, and helping the parts trust that it is safe to let you stay. As was illustrated in our work, most of these protectors still think you're quite young and don't trust you can handle things. Once they realize how much you can handle, they're so relieved and thrilled to have somebody like you run your life and drive the bus.
One of the things I've done is when a client notices a part, I'll ask, what does that part of you want you to know? That in itself has been really valuable.
R
Richard Swartz43:38
That's exactly right. That simple question. Sometimes you have to be a little more directive and say, focus on that part, find it in your body, and direct the question right there. What does it want you to know? Often you'll get more clarity that way.
A
Allison Wittmeyer44:10
I don't go any further than what does it want you to know, what is it afraid would happen if it didn't do what it does, or what is it protecting you from. I don't feel like I have the ability to go further, or it's appropriate for me. But just those alone, along with where is it in your body and integrating some mindfulness techniques, has had powerful consequences for my clients.
R
Richard Swartz45:01
The other question I think is safe for you to add is what I used: ask this part how old it thinks you are, and if it thinks you're young, just update it and see how it reacts. As you can see, that had an impact. There's also a general question for protectors: ask this part what it needs from you going forward. That's a good question.
A
Allison Wittmeyer45:30
For those of you who are coaches, I really encourage you to get Dick's book. Dick has some courses for coaches that are more on demand. Even if you do nothing more than integrate some of these basic questions, it has been transformative to some of me and my coaching clients. Who else has questions? Henry, do you still have a question?
A
Audience Member46:16
It partly got answered in the latest discussion. I recently took the EQ profile and discovered that I had deeply buried some traumas that I hadn't realized were part of the story. It hit a low point, but I had also attended Richard's webinar previously. So I went to the different parts I could recognize—when I was four, when I was six and a half, when I was 12—and each one had traumatic things that happened. Without knowing anything more, I just went in and introduced myself to my parts and said, hey, I'm here, I love you, you're part of me, do you need anything from me right now? When they said no, it's nice to know you're there, I said, I will be with you and here if you ever need me, so come get me when you need me. It seems safe to do that as opposed to anything else. I wanted to pass that on. It was more intuitive, but it made a big difference.
R
Richard Swartz47:58
It's beautiful. Thank you so much for that story. I think that is where we're going to land that. As you work with protectors as a coach, you're going to learn about exiles because they're going to tell you they're protecting these other parts. Rather than ignoring them until you get to an IFS therapist, I think it's safe to do what Henry did: let them know you see them, you're not going to forget about them, and you welcome them. That much can be very powerful as a placeholder until you get to a point where you are with somebody who can take you the other steps.
A
Audience Member48:52
I was wondering if you could speak a little more about the dangers that could arise from working with exiles and maybe give an example to kind of hammer that point home.
R
Richard Swartz49:07
I learned the dangers the hard way when I was starting out. These clients who were teaching it to me would talk about their exiles, and I would think that's where we need to go because that's what needs healing. I would succeed in the session, and my client would have this big cathartic experience. But then I noticed that shortly after the session they'd have some big dramatic backlash experience. I had clients get into a car wreck right after my session and claimed they couldn't see the car. I had a client spike a big fever. A variety of ways that their protectors were punishing us for having violated the rules by going to these exiles without permission from the protectors. So I learned the hard way to always start with protectors and get permission. We sort of did that, but Allison also had a lot of self, so I felt confident to go to her exile. But yeah, these are delicate inner ecologies in some cases, and we need to be ecologically sensitive as we go in and learn the rules and get permission.
A
Allison Wittmeyer50:50
Thank you. One of the questions I got in the chat, and I can't imagine the answer, but I'm going to ask is, is there a way to do this at an organizational level, to make it bigger?
R
Richard Swartz51:13
We're exploring that. I've got a couple partners who are fairly prominent organizational type people, and we're trying to figure that out. I do believe it's all parallel. You could look at an organization this way: who are the exiles, who are the managers, who are the firefighters? You can look at a country this way because our country is a massive example of that right now. Where's the self? How can we go into a company and help everybody start to access self and interact from that place rather than from all these parts? Especially the leaders, because self is contagious, and it will trickle down from a leader. But protective parts are also contagious. If your leader is in protectors, it will affect the atmosphere in the company in a big way. So those are all things we're talking about.
A
Audience Member52:36
I think we're all familiar with the inner critic. Shirzad Chamine has this concept of saboteurs and sages as the inner voice. How does this all fit with saboteurs and sages?
R
Richard Swartz53:08
Inner saboteurs have a really bad name in the field too. People are taught to fight with them or ignore them or override them, which is a huge mistake. There are parts. Allison had this hook which was desperate to not let her show herself. As she shows herself in this podcast, she's constantly feeling this hook. In those circles, that would be considered an inner saboteur. It turns out it's just a little kid who's terrified of being seen. That's the title of my book: No Bad Parts. I've worked with critics, temper tantrums, homicidal parts that have killed people in prisons, sex offenders. Even those parts, if you open to hear their secret histories, will tell you how they were forced into their roles and the burdens they carry and how they hate what they've done but can't stop themselves. This is a model of total, utter compassion for everything inside of you, and then once you can do that, everything outside of you. It's radical in that way.
A
Allison Wittmeyer54:56
One of the things that made me feel so hopeful is I've heard you say that everyone you've ever encountered, whether they're sociopaths or hardened criminals, everyone has a self.
R
Richard Swartz55:20
The only population I've had trouble accessing it with are people with fairly severe brain damage, because it seems like you have to have a certain amount of hardware to embody it. But for me, self isn't a psychological concept. It's much more of a spiritual essence that can be in us or is also a field around us. How we treat our body and how much we unburden allows more of it to be in us. A lot of my vision is that if we could bring enough self to this planet, things would change very quickly.
A
Allison Wittmeyer56:14
I love that. Certainly bringing more self to the planet starts with bringing more self to ourselves, which means working with our parts. Other than being in active dialogue or relationship with our parts, are there other ways we can activate or be more in ourselves?
R
Richard Swartz56:40
When we do the trainings, we teach people to notice when you're in self and when you're not. As I came to do this podcast, I start by checking in: what are my friendly protectors doing right now? I can notice them in different places in my body. I've got parts of stress in my forehead, weight on my shoulders, my heart can be closed. I just notice all those protectors and remind them: remember it always goes better if you trust me, just let me handle this podcast. Then I feel all this opening and release. My heart is open now, I don't have a big agenda about what happens. I feel connected to you partly because you're so gracious. I feel much more open. I'm checking that all the time. There's a kind of vibrating energy that runs through my body when I have a lot of self-energy. I also mentioned that when people are in self, they have these C-word qualities: calm, curious, compassionate, confident, and there are four others: clarity, courage, creativity, and connectedness. Those are the eight C's of self-leadership. I can notice how much of those qualities am I embodying right now. If I'm not, it means there's a part that's blocking, so I ask it to give me some space. That is very teachable to the people you coach.
A
Allison Wittmeyer58:49
We need to bring things to a close. Thank you to Adam Friedman for answering some questions in the chat, and Michael too. As we finish up, I really hope you order Dick's book No Bad Parts. He wrote it for everybody, not necessarily therapists. Pick it up. I had a client zoom through it twice and found it so digestible. Dick, do you know where it's going to be on Audible?
R
Richard Swartz59:39
I don't know for sure, sorry.
A
Allison Wittmeyer59:42
Okay. If you'd like to learn more about how to connect with Dick, go to the website. His courses are over-subscribed right now, and you can see why. There are lots of books and online opportunities to get involved. He has so many courses through Sounds True and IFS. One of the things we are offering in the fall at Learning in Action is a Mindful Coach Certification for people who are already coaches. I began sensing during the pandemic that I wasn't coaching my client's self, I was just coaching all these firefighting parts, and it wasn't sticking. So we created this beta Mindful Coach Certification. It's a live online 12-week course about introducing mindfulness techniques into coaching in a seamless way to access more of the client's self. If you sign up, we have a discount code for you. We would love for you to join us. Henry mentioned the EQ profile. That's an instrument we have that reveals our internal experience under stress. It tends to point to our firefighters: what emotions do I access, what are the color of my thoughts, do I focus on me or the other person, am I able to read what the other person is thinking, feeling, and wanting. That's our flagship course, a 12-week online live course with 49 ICF credits, starting in the fall. We'd love to have you join us.